Skip to main content

Full text of "Interdisciplinary Investigations of the Boott Mills, Lowell, Massachusetts: Volume III: The Boarding House System as a Way of Life"

See other formats


St 

il/v.3 


Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of  the  Boott  Mills 

Lowell,  Massachusetts 


Volume  III:  The  Boarding  House  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Cultural  Resources  Management  Study  No.  21 


Division  of  Cultural  Resources 
North  Atlantic  Regional  Office 

National  Park  Service 

U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior 

1989 


JNIVERSITY  OF  GEORGIA 

JAN  1  7  1990 

LIBRARIES 
DEPOSITORY 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2012  with  funding  from 

LYRASIS  Members  and  Sloan  Foundation 


http://archive.org/details/interdisciplinar00vol3 


LOWE300 
LOWELL  NATIONAL  HISTORICAL  PARK  SURVEY  PROJECT 

INTERDISCIPLINARY  INVESTIGATIONS  OF  THE  BOOTT  MILLS 
LOWELL,  MASSACHUSETTS 

volume  mn 

THE  IBOARDIMG  HOUSE  SYSTEM  AS  A  WAY  OF  LIFE 

Edited  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski 

with  contributions  by: 

Mary  C.  Beaudry 

Kathleen   H.  Bond 

Gregory  K.  Clancey 

Lauren  C.  Cook 

David  H.  Dutton 

William  F.  Fisher 

Gerald  K.  Kelso 

David  B.  Landon 

Stephen  A.  Mrozowski 

Karl  J.  Reinhard 

Grace  H.  Ziesing 

Cooperative  Agreement  No.  CA1600-5-0004 

Report  Prepared  for: 

National  Park  Service 

North  Atlantic  Regional  Office 

15  State  Street 

Boston,  MA  02109 

Report  Prepared  by: 

Center  for  Archaeological  Studies 

Boston  University 

675  Commonwealth  Avenue 

Boston,  MA  02215 

Cultural  Resources  Management  Studies  No.  21 

Division  of  Cultural  Resources 
North  Atlantic  Regional  Office 

National  Park  Service 
U.  S.  Department  of  the  Interior 


1989 


CONTENTS 

List  of  Figures  v 

List  of  Tables  xv 

Preface  xvii 

Acknowledgments  xix 

Chapter  1:        Introduction  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  1 

Chapter  2:        The  Origin  of  the  Boott  Boardinghouse  Plan  and  Its  Fate  After  1836 

by  Gregory  K.  Clancey  7 

Chapter  3:        "that  we  may  purify  our  corporation  by  discharging  the  offenders":  The 
Documentary  Record  of  Social  Control  in  the  Boott  Boardinghouses 
by  Kathleen  H.  Bond  23 

Chapter  4:        Domestic  Ideology  and  the  Economics  of  Boardinghouse  Keeping 

by  David  B.  Landon  37 

Chapter  5:        Archeology  in  the  Backlots  of  Boott  Units  45  and  48:  Household  Archeology 

with  a  Difference  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and  Stephen  Mrozowski  49 

Chapter  6:        'Thrasher's  China"  or  Colored  Porcelain:   Ceramics  from  a  Boott  Mills 

Boardinghouse  and  Tenement  by  David  H.  Dutton  83 

Chapter  7:        The  Medicine,  Alcohol,  and  Soda  Vessels  from  the  Boott  Mills 

by  Kathleen  H.  Bond  121 

Chapter  8:        Analysis  of  Personal  Effects  from  Excavations  of  the  Boott  Mills 

Boardinghouse  Backlots  in  Lowell  by  Grace  H.  Ziesing  141 

Chapter  9:        Faunal  Remains  from  the  Boott  Mills  Boardinghouses  by  David  B.  Landon  169 

Chapter  10:      Descriptive  Analysis  of  Tobacco-Related  Material  from  the  Boott  Mills 

Boardinghouses  by  Lauren  J.  Cook  187 

Chapter  11:      Tobacco-Related  Material  and  the  Construction  of  Working-Class  Culture  by 

Lauren  J.  Cook  209 

Chapter  12:      Contextual  Archeology  at  the  Boott  Mills  Boardinghouse  Backlots  by  Gerald 

K.  Kelso,  William  F.  Fisher,  Karl  J.  Reinhard,  and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski  231 

Chapter  14:      Discussions  and  Conclusions  by  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski  and  Mary  C.  Beaudry  279 

References  293 

Appendix  A  Boott  Company  Correspondence  Microfiche 

Appendix  B  Ceramic  Vessel  Count  Microfiche 

Appendix  C  Catalog  of  Faunal  Remains  Microfiche 

Appendix  D  Results  of  Soil  Chemistry  Analysis  Microfiche 

Appendix  E  Artifact  Catalog  Microfiche 


FIGURES 


Figure  2-1.         Detail  of  1825  Lowell  map  showing  duplexes  belonging  to  the 

Merrimack  Company.  From  "A  Plan  of  the  Land  and  Buildings  belonging  to 

the  Merrimack  Manufacturing  Company..."  made  in  1825  by  Geo.  R. 

Baldwin.  (Courtesy  of  the  Lowell  National  Historical  Park.)  8 

Figure  2-2.  1832  map  of  Lowell  depicting  brick  boardinghouse  blocks  built  by  the 
Merrimack  Corporation  along  Dutton  Street.  (Courtesy  of  the  Lowell 
Historical  Society.)  9 

Figure  2-3.        John  Coolidge  photograph  of  a  later  Merrimack  Company  brick  housing 
block  on  the  east  side  of  Prince  Street.   (Courtesy  of  the  Museum  of 
American  Textile  History.)  10 

Figure  2-4.        John  Coolidge  photograph  of  Harvard  Yard.  Mill  housing  was  at  times 

compared  favorably  to  academic  dormitories.   (Courtesy  of  the  Museum  of 

American  Textile  History.)  1 1 

Figure  2-5.         Front  and  end  elevations  of  "one  of  the  Boott  blocks  of  Boarding  Houses," 
1836.  (Locks  and  Canals  Collection.  Courtesy  Lowell  Historical  Society  and 
University  of  Lowell  Special  Collections.)  12 

Figure  2-6.         Floor  plans  of  Boott  boardinghouse,  1836.  (Locks  and  Canals  Collection. 
Courtesy  Lowell  Historical  Society  and  University  of  Lowell  Special 
Collections.)  14 

Figure  2-7.         John  Coolidge  photograph  of  "New  Block"  of  Merrimack  Company  housing, 

built  ca.  1845.  (Courtesy  of  the  Museum  of  American  Textile  History.)  15 

Figure  2-8.         Amoskeag  blocks  no.  1  and  3,  first  and  upper  stories  (2).  Not  to  scale. 

(Copied  by  Gregory  K.  Clancey  from  plans  at  the  Manchester  Historical 

Society.  Redrawn  by  David  H.  Dutton.)  16 

Figure  2-9.         Middle  units,  Amoskeag  block  nos.  2,  4,  5,  6, 10, 15, 16, 17,  first  and  upper 
stories  (2).  The  end  units  were  identical  to  those  shown  in  Figure  2-8, 
but  the  number  of  middle  units  per  block  varied.  Not  to  scale.  (Copied  by 
Gregory  K.  Clancey  from  plans  at  the  Manchester  Historical  Society. 
Redrawn  by  David  H.  Dutton.)  17 

Figure  2-10.       John  Coolidge  photograph  of  Overseer's  Block,  Boott  Mills  Corporation. 

(Courtesy  of  the  Museum  of  American  Textile  History.)  18 

Figure  2-11.       Elevation  and  plans  of  Bay  State  Mills  boardinghouse,  Lawrence, 

Massachusetts.   (Reproduced  from  Shattuck  1850.)  19 

Figure  2-12.       Essex  Company  Machine  Shop  blocks,  Lawrence,  Massachusetts,  ca.  1847; 
first  story  of  2  1/2  stories.  Fifty  units  were  constructed,  in  rows  of  61 -17  units 
each.  Not  to  scale.  (Copied  by  Gregory  K.  Clancey  from  plans  at  the 
Manchester  Historical  Society.  Redrawn  by  David  H.  Dutton.)  20 

Figure  3-1.         A  man  washing  up  outside  the  rear  door  of  a  Homestead,  Pennsylvania, 

boardinghouse.   Note  bottles  and  other  refuse  accumulated  on  the  ground 

against  the  building.   (Lewis  Hine  photograph  reproduced  from  Byington 

1910.)  28 


Figure  3-2.        A  group  of  men  playing  cards  in  the  courtyard  of  a  Homestead, 

Pennsylvania,  boardinghouse.  (Lewis  Hine  Photographgraph  reproduced 

from  Byington  1910.)  31 

Figure  5-1.         Lewis  Hine  photograph  of  washday  in  a  Homestead,  Pennsylvania, 

boardinghouse  backlot.  (Reproduced  from  Byington  1910).  51 

Figure  5-2.         Lewis  Hine  photograph  of  a  Homestead,  Pennsylvania,  boardinghouse 

backlot.  (Reproduced  from  Byington  1910).  52 

Figure  5-3.         John  Coolidge  photograph  of  backlots  of  mill  housing  in  Somersworth,  New 
Hampshire.  These  free-standing  wooden  board inghouses  have  two  backlots 
apiece,  each  with  a  clothesline,  many  with  gardens,  all  with  weedy  growth  of 
some  sort.  (Courtesy  Museum  of  American  Textile  History.)  53 

Figure  5-4.         John  Coolidge  photograph  of  backlots  of  brick  mill  housing  in  Somersworth, 
New  Hampshire.  Behind  these  blocks  of  housing  are  clotheslines,  sheds, 
and,  in  the  foreground,  an  animal  pen.   Note  also  the  accumulated  refuse  as 
well  as  weedy  growth  along  buildings  and  fence  lines.  (Courtesy  Museum  of 
American  Textile  History.)  54 

Figure  5-5.         The  backlots  shown  in  Figure  5-2  sometime  later.  Note  that  the  animal  pen 
has  now  been  partly  roofed  over  with  corrugated  tin  sheeting  held  down  by 
planks  and  stones;  a  number  of  tubs  and  crocks  are  lined  up  against  the 
enclosure.  (Courtesy  Museum  of  American  Textile  History.)  55 

Figure  5-6.         John  Coolidge  photograph  of  alley-facing  mill  housing  in  Lowell.  The  refuse 
accumulated  in  the  unpaved  alley  and  overflowing  from  the  trash  barrels  is 
creating  an  archeological  record  not  unlike  that  uncovered  by  Faulkner  et  al. 
in  an  alley  outside  a  waterfront  boardinghouse  in  Newburyport, 
Massachusetts.   (Courtesy  Museum  of  American  Textile  History.)  58 

Figure  5-7.         Plan  of  1985  test  trenches  and  the  1986  excavation  units  in  the  Locks  and 

Canals  parking  lot  adjacent  to  the  restored  boardinghouse  (now  the  Patrick  J. 
Mogan  Cultural  Center).  The  dashed  lines  represent  the  footprints  of  two 
demolished  board  inghouses  located  through  comparison  with  the  1892 
Sanborn  map.  (Drawing  by  Gerald  MacComber  and  David  H.  Dutton.)  62 

Figure  5-8.  Plan  of  Operation  A,  the  rear  yard  of  Boott  unit  48,  a  supervisors  tenement. 

Residents  of  the  street-facing  tenement  did  not  have  direct  access  to  the 
backlot  and  its  privy  but  had  to  enter  through  the  gate  opening  (features  21 
and  22,  bottom  center,  are  post  holes  of  this  gate)  onto  French  street. 
(Drawing  by  David  H.  Dutton.)  63 

Figure  5-9.         Plan  of  Operation  B,  the  rear  yard  of  Boott  unit  45  and  a  small  portion  of  unit 

44  (at  top);  both  were  boardinghouses.  (Drawing  by  David  H.  Dutton.)  64 

Figure  5-10.       Overhead  view  of  Operation  A.  The  rubble-filled  cellar  is  at  the  right;  the 
bulkhead  entry  and  ell  project  from  this.  The  well  incorporated  into  the  ell 
foundation  was  shared  with  adjacent  unit.  A  stone-line  privy  (upper  left)  was 
housed  in  a  woodshed  at  the  rear  of  the  yard.  Various  drainage  features, 
post  holes,  and  planting  holes  can  also  be  seen.  Camera  faces  south. 
(Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.)  65 

Figure  5-11.        Feature  23,  the  bulkhead  entry.  Note  that  entry  into  cellar  has  been  blocked 

up.  Camera  faces  west.  (Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.)  67 


Figure  5-12.        View  of  feature  23,  bulkhead  entry,  also  showing  features  27  and  38,  planting 

holes.  Camera  faces  west.  (Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.)  68 

Figure  5-13.       View  of  the  back  wall  of  the  boardinghouse;  rubble  fill  of  the  cellar  is  at  the 
top;  the  gate  posts  (features  21  and  22)  are  at  the  left;  from  left  to  right  can  be 
seen  the  bulkhead  entry  (feature  23,  two  planting  holes  (features  27  and  38, 
the  rear  wall  of  the  boardinghouse  (feature  30),  the  ell  (feature  33),  a  drain 
(feature  34),  and  the  well  (feature  43).  Below  the  ell  lies  a  drain  box  and  pipe 
trench  (features  37  and  44),  and  in  the  lower  right  an  unexcavated  feature 
(35)  thought  to  be  a  cesspit.  Camera  faces  west.  (Photograph  by  Paul  S. 
Giblin.)  70 

Figure  5-14.        Detail  of  Operation  A  showing  features  33,  34,  43,  37,  and  44.  Only  a  portion 
of  feature  44  was  excavated;  the  trench  continues  around  the  corner  of  the  ell 
foundation  and  is  cut  by  feature  38,  a  planting  hole.  Camera  faces  south. 
(Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.)  72 

Figure  5-15.        Early  20th-century  photograph  of  the  interior  of  a  tenement  water  closet  in 

Lowell  worker  housing.  (Reproduced  from  Kenngott  1912.)  74 

Figure  5-16.        Feature  50,  an  ell  foundation  in  Operation  B.  A  line  of  stones  at  the  top  of  the 
photograph  may  have  been  part  of  previous  ell  foundation.  In  the 
foreground  can  be  seen  two  of  the  granite  sills  used  atop  the  boardinghouse 
foundation.  The  darker  areas  of  soil  in  this  photograph  are  indicative  of  the 
highly  organic  nature  of  the  deposits  in  this  backlot.  Camera  faces  east. 
(Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.)  76 

Figure  5-17.       View  along  the  rear  wall  of  units  #45  and  44,  Operation  B.     Camera  faces 

south.  (Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.)  77 

Figure  5-18.        Feature  61,  the  Operation  B  privy,  when  first  uncovered.  The  blackened  area 
to  the  left  is  a  deposit  of  coal  dust;  the  stones  have  been  pushed  into  the  fill 
of  the  feature.     Camera  faces  north.  (Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.)  79 

Figure  5-19.        Feature  61  after  excavation,  looking  straight  down  into  the  privy  vault. 

Portions  of  a  wooden  box  or  internal  partition  can  be  seen  on  the  right;  at  the 

top  is  a  cast-iron  vent  pipe.     Camera  faces  west.  (Photograph  by  Paul  S. 

Giblin.)  80 

Figure  6-1.         French  &  Puffer  advertisement  from  Lowell  Sunday  Arena    February  12, 

1893.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  87 

Figure  6-2.         A.  G.  Pollard  &  Company  advertisement  from  Lowell  Sunday  Arena 

February  12, 1893.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  88 

Figure  6-3.         Redware  flower  pot  recovered  from  tenement  backlot.     (Photograph  by 

Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  91 

Figure  6-4.         Impressed  blue  shell  edged  pates  from  the  boardinghouse  and  tenement 

backlots  (1830-1850).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  93 

Figure  6-5.  Brown  floral  transfer  printed  plates  from  the  boardinghouse  and  tenement 

backlots  (1880-1910).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  93 

Figure  6-6.         Undecorated  whiteware  plate  (left)  from  the  tenement  and  platter  (right) 

from  the  boardinghouse.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  94 


vii 


Figure  6-7.         Photograph  of  boardinghouse  dining  room  ca.  1910.    (Courtesy  of  Lowell 

National  Historical  Park)  95 

Figure  6-8.         Undecorated   whiteware  tea/coffee  cups  from  the  boardinghouse  and 

tenement  backlots.   (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  96 

Figure  6-9.         Handpainted    saucers    from    corporate   housing    backlots    (1840-1860). 

(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  97 

Figure  6-10.        Large  undecorated  yellow  ware  bowl  from  the  boardinghouse  backlot. 

(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  99 

Figure  6-11.        Sponge  decorated  stoneware  bowls  from  the  backlot  excavations  (1860-1935). 

(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  99 

Figure  6-12.        Diamond  trademark  registration.   (Reproduced  from  Godden  1964:527-528)  106 

Figure  6-13.       Sampson,  Bridgewood   &  Son  (LTD)  of  the  Anchor  Pottery,  Longton, 

Staffordshire  Potteries  (1884-1891).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  109 

Figure  6-14.        American  Crockery  Company,  Trenton,  New  Jersey  (post-1890).   (Photograph 

by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  109 

Figure  6-15.        Knowles,  Taylor  &  Knowles  Company,  East  Liverpool,  Ohio  (post-1881). 

(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  109 

Figure  6-16.       John    Alcock    Pottery,    Cobridge,    Staffordshire    Potteries    (1848-1851). 

(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  109 

Figure  6-17.        U.  &  R.  Boote  Ltd,  Waterloo,  Burslem,  Staffordshire  Potteries    (1853-1856). 

(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  110 

Figure  6-18.       John  Edwards  &  Company,  King  Street,  Fenton,  Staffordshire  Potteries  (1891- 

1900).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  110 

Figure  6-19.        Homer  Laughlin  China  Company,  East  Liverpool,  Ohio  (1879-1897),  pattern 

mark  "Colonial"  printed  beneath.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  110 

Figure  6-20.       Warwick    China    Company,    Wheeling,    West    Virginia    (1879-1900). 

(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  110 

Figure  6-21.        Cook  Pottery  Company,  Trenton,  New  Jersey  (post-1894).    (Photograph  by 

Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  112 

Figure  6-22.        International    Pottery    Company,    Trenton,    New    Jersey    (post-1903). 

(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  112 

Figure 6-23.       Taylcr,   Smith   &  Taylor  Company,   East   Liverpool,   Ohio   (post-1901). 

(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  112 

Figure  6-24.       Goodwin  Pottery,  East  Liverpool,  Ohio  (post-1844).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 

Kanaski.)  112 

Figure  6-25.        West  End  Pottery  Company,  East  Liverpool,  Ohio  (post-1893).    (Photograph 

by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  116 

Figure  6-26.        Potter's    Co-operative    Company,    East    Liverpool,    Ohio    (post-1876). 

(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  116 


Figure  7-1.         Feature  46,  a  bottle  dump  just  outside  the  tenement  privy.    Camera  faces 

east.  (Photograph  by  Paul  Giblin.)  123 

Figure  7-2.         Rectangular  medicine  bottle  embossed  Dr.  Chmielnicki  &  Co.,  Chemists 

Somerville,  Massachusetts.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  125 

Figure  7-3.         Embossed  wording  on  the  side  of  W.  F.  Severa  medicine  bottle.  (Photograph 

by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  125 

Figure  7-4.        Two  rectangular  medicine  bottles.    Left,  W.  F.  Severa  medicine.    Right,  Dr. 

Chmielnicki  &  Co.,  Chemists.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  126 

Figure  7-5  Five  empontilled  medicine  bases.  Top  left,  octagonally-shaped  vial,  two-part 
mold.  Top  center,  bottle,  dip  molded  (ribbed  design  is  not  visible).  Top  right, 
vial,  dip  molded  (ribbed  design  not  visible).  Bottom  left,  vial,  dip  molded  or 
free  blown.  Bottom  right,  Moses  Atwood's  Jaundice  Bitters  bottle,  dip 
molded.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  126 

Figure  7-6:         French  Square  medicine  bottle.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  127 

Figure  7-7  Two  toiletry  and  ointment  jars.  Left,  milk  glass  screw-top  toiletry  or  medicine 
jar.  Right,  screw-top  Vaseline  ointment  jar.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.)  128 

Figure  7-8  Three  medicine  bottles.  Left,  light  green  Kemp's  Balsam.  Center, 
unembossed  bottle,  with  inset  front.  Right,  unembossed  vial.  (Photograph 
by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  128 

Figure  7-9.  Three  pint  liquor  flasks.  Left,  flask  embossed  "One  Pint."  Center,  flask 
embossed  "Guaranteed  Full  Pint."  Right,  H.  Swartz  &  Co.  flask.  (Photograph 
by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  129 

Figure  7-10.  Advertisements  in  1900  Lowell  City  Directory  for  P.  Dempsey  &  Co.  and 
James  Calnin,  as  well  as  other  Lowell  liquor  dealers.  (Photograph  by  Richard 
S.  Kanaski.)  130 

Figure  7-11.        Partial  Rickett's  "wine"  base.     Base  from  yard  scatter.     (Photograph  by 

Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  132 

Figure  7-12.       Detail  of  embossing  on  Rickett's  "wine"  base.  (Drawing  by  Leslie  A.  Mead.)  132 

Figure  7-13.       Advertisement  in  1901  Lowell  City  Directory    for  Harvard  Brew  Company. 

(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  134 

Figure  7-14  Three  soda  bottles.  Left,  embossed  P.Kelley  &  Co.  Center,  embossed  P. 
Kelley.  Right,  embossed  Jas.  Calnin  &  Co.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.)  135 

Figure  7-15.       Detail  of  the  Kelley  and  Calnin  soda  bottles.    (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 

Kanaski.)  135 

Figure  7-16.       Advertisement  in  1897  Lowell  City  Directory   for  P.  Kelley.    (Photograph  by 

Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  136 

Figure  8-1.         Some  of  the  86  white  utilitarian  sew-through  porcelain  buttons  excavated 
from  the  Boott  Mills  backlots  in  Lowell  (scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  142 


Figure  8-2.         A  few  of  the  plain  white  porcelain  stationary  collar  studs  excavated  from  the 
Boott  Mills  backlots  in  Lowell  (scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.)  143 

Figure  8-3.         Stationary  and  lever-top  collar  studs  available  from  the  1895  Montgomery 
Ward  catalog.   Note  that  these  are  specifically  identified  as  collar  buttons, 
and  that  one  is  labelled  exclusively  for  ladies.   (Reproduced  courtesy  of 
Dover  Publications,  Inc.)  143 

Figure  8-4.         A  sample  of  "jet"  buttons  available  from  Montgomery  Ward  in  1895. 

(Reproduced  courtesy  of  Dover  Publications,  Inc.)  145 

Figure  8-5.  Plain  and  decorated  porcelain  buttons  ("Agates"  and  "Fancy  Pearl  Agates") 
advertised  in  the  1895  Montgomery  Ward  catalog.  (Reproduced  courtesy  of 
Dover  Publications,  Inc.)  146 

Figure  8-6.         Formal  and  decorative  typology  used  throughout  this  analysis  to  facilitate 
description  of  white  porcelain  buttons.   Buttons  can  be  described  both  in 
terms  of  shape:  A)  dish;  B)  saucer;  C)  mound;  D)  inkwell,  and  decorative 
elements:  E)  hobnail  border;  F)  pie-crust  border.  The  dish  is  the  most 
common  and  the  least  distinctive  shape  as  the  size,  slope,  and  shape  of  the 
rim  is  variable.  In  a  sense,  this  is  a  "catch-all"  designation  for  those  buttons 
that  do  not  fit  into  the  other,  more  distinctive,  categories.   In  addition,  there  is 
a  banded  variety  in  which  the  edge  is  painted  in  a  solid  color.  Banding 
occurs  most  frequently  on  inkwell  shaped  buttons,  but  can  also  be  found  on 
dishes,  hobnails,  and  pie-crusts.  (Drawing  by  Leslie  A.  Mead.)  149 

Figure  8-7.        Two-hole  porcelain  buttons.  Buttons  in  top  row  and  at  either  end  of  center 

row  are  mound-shaped  (scale  in  cm).  (Photographby  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  150 

Figure  8-8.         Four-hole  porcelain  buttons.  Buttons  in  top  row  are  inkwell-shaped  with 

banded  decoration.  The  buttons  in  the  middle  row  are  dish-shaped  with  pie- 
crust borders.  The  first  button  in  the  bottom  row  is  dish-shaped  with  a 
hobnail  border  and  the  rest  have  pie-crust  borders  (scale  in  cm). 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  150 

Figure  8-9.         Miscellaneous  buttons:  A)  glass  hemispherical  button  with  probable  loop 
shank  from  Feature  6  behind  the  boardinghouse;  B)  faceted  orange  glass 
self-shank  button  from  Feature  46  behind  the  tenement;  and  C)  four-hole 
wood  button  from  level  1  in  Operation  B  (scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  151 

Figure  8-10.       Black  glass  buttons.  A)  Pressed  glass  button  with  swirl  design  and  polished 
facets  running  down  the  center  recovered  from  level  1  of  Feature  43  in 
Operation  A.  B)  One  of  two  identical  pressed  glass  buttons  found  in  level  1  of 
Operation  B.  Two-thirds  of  the  surface  is  faceted  and  the  other  third  is 
fashioned  as  a  smiling  quarter-moon  face.  C)  A  pressed  black  glass  button 
with  polished  facets  and  an  applied  silver  luster  which  makes  the  button 
resemble  steel.  This  button  was  recovered  from  level  1  in  the  open  yard  area 
of  Operation  B.  D)  A  large  faceted  pressed  glass  button  probably  meant  for 
an  overcoat,  found  in  level  2  of  the  boardinghouse  yard.  E)  A  pressed  glass 
button  with  a  geometric  design  and  unpolished  facets  uncovered  in  level  4  of 
Trench  #1.  (Drawing  by  Leslie  A.  Mead.)  152 

Figure  8-11.       Metal  alloy  self-shank  button  excavated  from  level  1  of  the  privy  in 

Operation  B  (Feature  61).   (Drawing  by  Leslie  A.  Mead.)  152 


Figure  8-12.       Decorative  clothing  stud,  possibly  half  of  a  cufflink,  set  with  a  blue  stone, 
uncovered  in  level  3  of  Trench  #1  (scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.)  153 

Figure  8-13.       Celluloid  pin-back  button  manufactured  after  1893.  The  legend  reads  "KISS 
ME  [illegible]  I'M  STERILIZED"  and  may  be  related  to  the  influenza 
epidemic  of  1918.  The  button  was  found  in  level  B  of  the  privy  in  Operation 
A.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  155 

Figure  8-14.       Two  brooches  that  probably  framed  photographs  or  miniatures.    A)  Brooch 
with  copper  alloy  frame  and  braided  border  found  in  level  2  behind  the 
tenement.   A  dense  white  substance  that  may  be  paper  adheres  to  the  back 
of  the  glass.  B)  Brooch  with  copper  alloy  frame  with  elaborate  border  found 
in  level  1  of  Feature  38,  also  behind  the  tenement.  Remnants  of  paper  fibers 
and  Photographgraphic  emulsion  are  evident  within  the  frame,  suggesting 
that  a  photograph  was  mounted  on  this  brooch  (scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  157 

Figure  8-15.       Top  and  side  view  of  rhinestone  pin  uncovered  within  the  ell  in  level  1  of  the 
boardinghouse  excavation  (scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.)  157 

Figure  8-16.       Some  of  the  combs  excavated  from  the  backlots  of  the  Boott  Mills' 

boardinghouse/tenement.   A)  Straight  comb,  possibly  made  of  horn.  B) 

Hard  rubber  fine-tooth  comb  (see  also  Figure  8-18b).   C)  Side  comb,  possibly 

made  of  tortoise  shell.  D)  Hard  rubber  side  or  back  comb,  bent  over  so  that 

the  bridge  will  cover  the  hair  where  the  comb  enters  it  (see  also  Figure  8- 

18a).  E)  Plastic  side  comb  with  decorative  bridge.  Combs  A-D  were  found  in 

level  1  of  the  yard  area  behind  the  boardinghouse.  Comb  E  was  excavated 

from  level  9d  of  the  well  (Feature  2)  in  Trench  #2,  also  behind  the 

boardinghouse.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.)  159 

Figure  8-17.       Front  and  back  view  of  small  oval  barrette  with  cotter  pin  clasp  from  level  1  of 
the  boardinghouse  backlot  (scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.)  160 

Figure  8-18.       Two  hard  rubber  combs  with  imprints.  A)  Side  or  back  comb  with  bent 

bridge  (see  also  Figure  8-16d).   B)  Fine-tooth  comb  (see  also  Figure  8-16b). 

Both  combs  were  found  in  level  1  of  the  boardinghouse  backlot.  (Drawing  by 

Leslie  A.  Mead.)  161 

Figure  8-19.       1917  Photograph  of  textile  worker  drawing-in,  showing  the  use  of  hair  combs 
and  hair  pins  to  keep  the  hair  up.  Note  also  the  beaded  necklace. 
(Reproduced  courtesy  of  the  Museum  of  American  Textile  History.)  162 

Figure  8-20.       1917  Photograph  of  mill  worker  filling  a  shuttle,  showing  the  use  of  a  bar  pin 
on  the  front  of  her  work  smock.  (Reproduced  courtesy  of  the  Museum  of 
American  Textile  History.)  163 

Figure  8-21.       Women  sitting  on  the  back  steps  of  a  Homestead,  Pennsylvania, 

boardinghouse  ca.  1910,  showing  the  use  of  plain  white  utilitarian  burtons 

down  the  front  of  the  shirtwaist  dress  of  the  woman  to  the  right  in  front. 

(Lewis  Hine  photograph  reproduced  from  Byington  1910.)  167 

Figure  9-1 .         Proximal  view  of  a  butchered  cow  humerus  showing  striations  left  by  a  saw.  1 70 


Figure  9-2.  Rat  bones  recovered  during  excavation  at  the  boardinghouses.  a,  b)  right 
dentary,  c)  left  humerus,  d)  right  tibia  and  fibula,  e)  right  innominate,  f-h) 
right  femora;  a,b,d,and  e  are  probable  black  rat  (Rattus  rattus).  174 

Figure  9-3.         Size  3  femur  showing  extensive  rodent  gnawing,  caudal  view.  174 

Figure  9-4.         Plan  of  Operation  A  showing  distribution  of  bone  fragments  and  bones  with 

rodent  damage.    B-bone  fragments,  RD-rodent  damage.  176 

Figure  9-5.         Plan  of  Operation  B  showing  distribution  of  bone  fragments  and  bones  with 

rodent  damage.    B-bone  fragments,  RD-rodent  damage.  177 

Figure  9-6.  Butchered  sections  of  Bos  taurus  and  size  5  ribs  from  the  boardinghouses. 
All  views  shown  are  of  right  ribs,  medial  view.  Shaded  areas  represent  the 
portion  present.   SW-saw,  BK-break  178 

Figure  9-7.  Butchered  sections  of  Bos  taurus   bones  from  the  Boardinghouses.    Shaded 

areas  represent  the  portion  present.  SW-saw,  BK-break,  Sh-shear.  Not  to 
scale,  a,  b)  Left  humerus,  volar  view,  c)  Left  humerus,  lateral  view,  d)  Right 
femur,  plantar  view,  e)  Pelvis  and  sacrum,  slightly  ventral  cranial  view. 
Additional  cut  and  chop  on  caudal  side.  179 

Figure  9-8.  Butchered  sections  of  Bos  taurus  and  cf.  Bos  taurus  bones  from  the 
Boardinghouses.  Shaded  areas  represent  the  portion  present.  SW-saw,  SH- 
shear,  CT-cut,  BK-break.  Not  to  scale,  a)  Cervical  vertebra,  caudal  view,  b) 
Atlas,  cranial  view,  c)  Thoracic  vertebra,  cranial  view,  d)  Thoracic  vertebra, 
right  lateral  view,  e)  Left  scapula,  lateral  view.  180 

Figure  9-9.  Butchered    sections    of    Sus  scrofa     and   Ovis/Capra      bones    from    the 

boardinghouses.  Shaded  areas  represent  the  portion  present.  SW-saw,  SC- 
scrape,  SH-  shear,  BK-break.  Unlabelled  jagged  lines  represent  breaks.  Not 
to  scale,  a)  Ovis/Capra,  left  tibia,  dorsal  view,  b)  Ovis/Capra,  left  tibia, 
plantar  view,  c)  Sus  scrofa,  left  radius  and  ulna,  lateral  view,  d)  cf.  Sus 
scrofa,  left  scapula,  lateral  view,  e)  Ovis/Capra,  right  scapula,  lateral  view.  181 

Figure  9-10.  Butchered  portions  of  cow  bones,  a.  left  humerus,  distal  view.  b.  left  scapula, 
distal  view.  c.  left  illium,  caudal  view  (rotated  90°  counterclockwise).  See  also 
Figure  9-7a,  e  and  Figure  9-8e.  183 

Figure  10-1.       The  parts  of  a  pipe.  188 

Figure  10-2.        "Davidson/Glasgow"  pipestem  fragment.  Made  by  Thomas  Davidson  &  Co., 

Glasgow,  1863-1891.  188 

Figure  10-3.        McDougall/Scotland  pipe.  Made  by  McDougall  &  Co.,  Glasgow.  189 

Figure  10-4.       "W.  White/Glasgow"  pipestem  fragment.    Made  byWilliam  White  &  Son, 

Glasgow,  1805-1891.  189 

Figure  10-5.        William  White  &  Son  "Small  Plain  T.D."  pipe  fragment.  This  badly  worn 
example  bears  the  mold  number  "78,"  and  was  smoked  after  the  stem  was 
broken  off.  191 

Figure  10-6.        John  Waldie  &  Co.  pipestem  fragment,  made  in  Glasgow,  1870-1891.  191 

Figure  10-7.       German  pipestem  fragment,  post-1891.  192 

Figure  10-8.        "Gouda/Holland"  pipestem  fragment,  post-1891.  192 


Figure  10-9.        "S.T.&C. /Boston"  pipestem  fragment,  apparently  produced  for  Stephen 
Tilton  &  Co.  of  Boston,  wholesale  tobacconists,  1840-1904.    Not  to  scale. 
(Drawing  by  Lauren  J.  Cook.)  194 

Figure  10-10.  Geometrically  embossed  pipestem  fragment.  194 

Figure  10-11.  Tapered  mouthpiece.  195 

Figure  10-12.  Lipped  mouthpiece.  195 

Figure  10-13.  Broken  mouthpiece  showing  tooth  wear.  196 

Figure  10-14.  Whittled  mouthpiece.  1% 

Figure  10-15.      Left,  "Apple  shape  pipe  bowl  fragment,  impressed  "IF..."  or  "IR..."  on  bowl 

back.  Right,  "Woodstock  shape"  pipe  bowl,  maker  unknown.  197 

Figure  10-16.      "Home  Rule"  pipe  bowl  fragment.  Maker  unknown,  but  possibly  R. 

Bannerman,  Rouse's  Point,  N.Y.,  or  Thomas  Davidson,  Glasgow.    Not  to 

scale.  (Drawing  by  Lauren  J.  Cook.)  197 

Figure  10-17.      "Dhudeen"  pipe  bowl  fragment,  maker  unknown.  200 

Figure  10-18.      "Wolf  Tone"  pipe  bowl,  side  views.    Not  to  scale.  (Drawing  by  Lauren  J. 

Cook.)  200 

Figure  10-19.      "Wolf  Tone"  pipe  bowl,  showing  front  seam.  201 

Figure  10-20.      Nautical  motif  pipe  bowl  fragment.  Not  to  scale.  (Drawing  by  Lauren  J. 

Cook.)  201 

Figure  10-21.      Fluted  pipe  bowl  fragment,  showing  foliate  front  seam.  203 

Figure  10-22.      Partially  fluted  pipe  bowl  base  fragment.  203 

Figure  10-23.     Terra-cotta  "claw"  pipe  bowl  fragment.  Not  to  scale.  (Drawing  by  Lauren  J. 

Cook.)  204 

Figure  10-24.      Armorial  pipe  bowl  fragment,  with  unidentified  seal  on  bowl  back.  204 

Figure  10-25.      Plastic  pipe  mouthpieces.  Top,  Operation  A,  feature  44,  level  B.  Bottom, 

Operation  B,  21n8w,  level  2.  204 

Figure  10-26.      Blue  plastic  pocket  calendar  fragment,  1895-1896.  The  business  that 

distributed  this  calendar  has  not  yet  been  identified.  206 


Figure  11-1.       'The  Smokers,"  Henry  R.  Robinson,  lithograph,  1837.  Arents  Tobacco 

Collection,  New  York  Public  Library.  (Courtesy  New  York  Public  Library.)  217 

Figure  12-1.       The  layout  of  Kirk  Boott's  estate  as  shown  on  "A  Plan  of  the  Land  and 

Buildings  belonging  to  the  Merrimack  Manufacturing  Company..."  made  in 

1825  by  Geo.  R.  Baldwin.  Excavation  unit  21N/8W  indicated  by  shading. 

(Courtesy  Lowell  National  Historical  Park.)  233 


Figure  12-2.       Operation  B.,  unit  21N8W.  Features  61  and  65  indicated  by  hatching.  234 

Figure  12-3.       Operation  A.  Feature  27  indicated  by  hatching.  235 

Figure  12-4.       Theoretical  pollen  concentration,  degradation  and  differential  age 

distribution  patterns  in  soil.  238 

Figure  12-5.       Fort  Necessity,  Pennsylvania.  Pollen  frequencies,  core  No.  3.  240 

Figure  12-6.       Pollen  concentration  and  degradation  patterns,  Scottow's  Dock,  Boston, 

Massachusetts,  ca.  1640-1820.  242 

Figure  12-7        Kirk  Street  Agents'  House,  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  Pollen  frequencies, 

Square  J.  243 

Figure  12-8.       Palynologist's  field  sketch:  soil  stratigraphy  and  pollen  column  location, 

21N/8W,  northwest  profile.  244 

Figure  12-9.       Relative  pollen  frequencies,  21N/8W,  northwest  profile.  247 

Figure  12-10.     Relative  pollen  frequencies,  21N/8W,  northeast  profile.  248 

Figure  12-11.     A  view  of  the  Boott  millyard  published  in  Gleason's  Pictorial  in  1852.  This 
romanticized  scene  presents  an  idealized  image  of  early  19th-century 
industry.  249 

Figure  12-12.     Palynologist's  field  sketch:  soil  stratigraphy  and  pollen  column  location, 

21N/8W,  northeast  profile.  252 

Figure  12-13.     Relative  pollen  frequencies,  Feature  27  and  Feature  65.  253 

Figure  12-14.     Relative  pollen  frequencies,  Feature  61.  254 

Figure  12-15.     Palynologist's  field  sketch:  fill  stratigraphy  and  pollen  column  location,  north 

wall,  Feature  61.  256 

Figure  13-1.       Stereopticon  view,  ca.  1889,  showing  unidentified  workers  standing  outside 

Boott  housing  in  Amory  Street.  The  Boott  Mills  complex  is  to  the  right;  to  the 

left,  the  end  of  a  boardinghosue  block  can  be  seen.  The  narrow  wooden 

structure  with  a  pitched  roof  is  a  woodshed;  note  the  opening  or  gate  into  the 

fenced  backlot  and  ivy  growing  up  the  rear  wall  of  the  boardinghouse. 

(Courtesy  of  the  University  of  Lowell  Special  Collections  and  the  Lowell 

Historical  Society.)  281 

Figure  13-2.        An  unidentified  Polish  family  pose  on  the  stoop  of  their  Boott  tenement,  ca. 

1912.  (Reproduced  from  Kenngott  1912.)  286 

Figure  13-3.        The  residents  of  an  unidentified  boardinghouse  block  turn  out  for  a  group 

photograph,  ca.  1910  (?).  Note  flower  pots  outside  second  third-story  window 
from  the  right.  (Courtesy  of  the  Society  for  the  Preservation  of  New  England 
Antiquities.)  287 


TABLES 


Table  4-1.  Employment  distribution  of  Boston  women  in  1884.  40 

Table  4-2.  Employment  in  domestic  and  personal  service  for  Boston  women  in  1884.  40 

Table  4-3.  Employment  distribution  for  women  in  Massachusetts  in  1885.  40 

Table  4-4.  Employment  in  domestic  and  personal  service  for  Massachusetts  women  in  1885.  41 

Table  6-1.  Summary  of  ceramics  by  ware  type.  90 

Table  6-2.  Summary  of  ceramics  by  vessel  type.  92 

Table  6-3.  Summary  of  ceramics  by  decoration.  92 

Table  6-4.  Summary  of  Miller  index  values.  100 

Table  6-5.  Comparison  of  ceramic  vessels  per  person.  101 

Table  6-6.  Counts  and  percentages  of  ceramic  types  within  total  vessel  counts.  101 

Table  6-7.  Table,  storage,  serving,  and  tea  and  coffee  wares.  102 

Table  6-8.  Transfer  printed  flatware,  edged  flatware,  and  banded  bowls.  102 

Table  6-9.  Summary  of  vessels  per  form.  102 

Table  6-10.  Ceramic  terminus  post  quern  by  feature.  104 

Table  7-1.  Minimum  vessel  count,  operation  A.  122 

Table  7-2.  Minimum  vessel  count,  operation  B.  122 

Table  9-1.  Basic  quantification  of  the  faunal  assemblage  from  the  Boardinghouses.  171 

Table  9-2.  Fragment  quantification  by  taxon  or  size  classification  and  element.  172 

Table  9-3.  Quantification  of  bone  burning  for  the  boardinghouses.  175 

Table  9-4.  Quantification  of  butchery  marks  on  the  boardinghouse  bones.  182 

Table  9-5.  Meat  cuts  represented,  economic  rank,  and  cost-efficiency  rank.  184 

Table  10-1.  Modifications  of  mouthpieces,  all  contexts.  198 

Table  10-2.  Post-1891  features.  207 

Table  10-3.  Distribution  of  Scottish  pipe  stems  marked  Glascow  by  operation  and  level.  207 

Table  10-4.  Distribution  of  Scottish  pipe  stems  marked  Scotland  by  operation  and  level.  207 

Table  12-1.  Vernacular  and  Latin  names  of  plants.  237 

Table  12-2.  Grass  species  occurring  in  Massachusetts  that  produce  festucoid  (trapezoid) 

phytoliths.  261 


Table  12-3.       Grass  species  occurring  in  Massachusetts  that  produce  chloridoid  (saddle) 

phytoliths.  261 

Table  12-4.       Grass  species  occurring  in  Massachusetts  that  produce  panicoid  (bilobate) 

phytoliths.  262 

Table  12-5.       Grass  species  occurring  in  Massachusetts  that  produce  polylobate  and  cross-shaped 

phytoliths.  262 

Table  12-6.       Phytoliths  from  21N/8W  NW  profile.  263 

Table  12-7.       Phytoliths  from  21 N/8W  NE  profile.  263 

Table  12-8.       Percentage  of  corroded  phytoliths  from  21N/8W  NW  and  NE  profile.  265 

Table  12-9.       Stratigraphic  levels  from  operation  A  and  B  and  the  ppm  of  selected  elements.  269 

Table  12-10.     Drainage  features  and  the  ppm  of  selected  elements.  269 

Table  12-11.     Possible  planting  holes  and  the  ppm  of  selected  elements.  269 

Table  12-12.     Privies  and  the  ppm  of  selected  elements.  269 

Table  12-13.     Boott  Mills  boarding  house  plant  macrofossil  analysis  results.  274 


PREFACE 


In  this,  the  third  and  final  volume  of  reports  on  the  investigations  of  the  Boott  Cotton  Mills 
operation  in  Lowell,  the  focal  point  of  our  efforts  is  once  again  the  mill  operatives  and  the 
boardinghouses  in  which  they  lived.  With  the  boardinghouses  now  gone  and  the  examination 
of  interior  space  limited  to  documentary  research,  we  have  endeavored  to  probe  the  proxemics 
of  the  worker's  daily  lives  by  turning  our  attention  to  the  rear  yards.  These  small  but 
intensively  used  areas  served  the  needs  of  mill  workers  and  boardinghouse  keepers  alike.  Here 
was  a  truly  urban  space  where  work  and  leisure  activities  merged  to  create  a  material  record 
that  is  a  select  yet  fitting  legacy  for  a  laboring  people.  Much  like  the  prankster's  jar  of  peanuts 
that  explodes  in  the  hands  of  the  unsuspecting  dupe,  the  boardinghouse  yards  have  contained 
innumerable  surprises.  By  employing  excavation  techniques  geared  for  maximum  horizontal 
coverage  and  an  array  of  interdisciplinary  analytical  techniques,  we  hope  that  few  of  the 
surprises  have  eluded  us. 

I  would  like  to  take  this  opportunity  to  thank  the  many  skilled  participants  who  have 
contributed  their  time  and  talents  to  this  investigation  of  mill  life  in  Lowell.  Never  have  I 
worked  with  such  a  dedicated  group  of  researchers.  I  would  especially  like  to  thank  Mary 
Beaudry  and  the  many  graduate  students  from  Boston  University  who  have  performed  such  an 
outstanding  job.  To  my  colleague  Gerald  Kelso,  many  thanks  for  the  hours  of  argument  and 
discussion;  they  have  been  a  true  delight.  I  would  also  like  to  thank  Francis  P.  McManamon, 
D wight  Pitcaithly,  Myra  Harrison  and  the  entire  staff  of  the  Lowell  National  Historical  Park 
for  their  unflagging  support  for  the  project.  I  hope  our  efforts  have  proved  worthy  of  their 
support. 

Stephen  A.  Mrozowski 
Boston,  1989 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

Acknowledging  everyone  who  has  helped  with  the  Boott  Mills  project  is  impossible  because  their  number 
is  too  great,  but  we  would  like  to  give  credit  to  a  number  of  people  who  were  especially  vital  to  our  efforts.  At 
the  National  Park  Service,  Myra  Harrison  remained  an  enormous  supporter  despite  our  repeated  delays  in 
completing  this  report,  and  Francis  P.  McManamon  continued  his  support,  albeit  from  a  distance.  Sandra 
Walters  and  Sandra  Corbett  of  the  NPS  North  Atlantic  Regional  Office  deserve  special  thanks,  and  Larry 
Gall,  Edward  Hartley,  and  Mark  Vargas  of  the  Lowell  National  Historical  Park  have  all  been  extremely  helpful 
to  us.  Walter  Hickey  of  the  Pollard  Memorial  Library  in  Lowell  was  especially  helpful  to  Bond  in  her  research, 
and  John  Cheney  and  Daniel  Finamore  assisted  with  glass  identifications  and  attributions.  We'd  also  like  to 
acknowledge  the  invaluable  assistance  of  William  Sirull  of  the  Massachusetts  Department  of  Environmental 
Quality  Engineering,  Division  of  Hazardous  Waste;  Steve  Bodine  at  the  Soil  and  Plant  Tissue  Testing 
Laboratory;  and  Richard  F.  Fisher,  Head,  Forestry  Department  and  Professor  of  Forest  Soils,  Utah  State 
University;  and  to  the  archivists  at  the  Museum  of  American  Textile  History,  North  Andover,  and  the  Society 
for  the  Preservation  of  New  England  Antiquities,  Boston. 

We  extend  our  thanks  as  well  to  the  members  of  the  Lowell  Historical  Preservation  Commission;  the 
LHPC  provided  the  funds  for  excavations  at  the  Lowell  Boardinghouse  Park  Site,  for  which  we  are  extremely 
grateful.  Nancy  S.  Seasholes  served  as  Project  Archaeologist  for  the  field  work,  and  the  field  crew  included 
Ellen  Berkland,  Edward  L.  Bell,  Lauren  J.  Cook,  John  Fox,  William  F.  Fisher,  Daniel  Finamore,  and  Paul  S. 
Giblin.  Boston  University  students  who  volunteered  in  the  field  included  Jeannette  Brown,  Tony  Dolan,  Hatsy 
Hornblower,  Jacqueline  Kurtz,  Matt  McDermott,  Robin  Mills,  Matthew  Packard,  and  Paulene  Powers.  Giblin 
also  served  as  field  photographer  for  the  project;  darkroom  work  was  done  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski  and  Michael 
Hamilton,  and  Eliza  McClennan  of  the  Boston  University  Department  of  Geography  produced  the  PMTs  for 
the  report  in  record  time,  interrupting  her  summer  vacation  to  do  so.  David  Dutton  produced  the  maps  for 
this  report  (in  some  cases  adapting  maps  prepared  earlier  by  Gerald  Macomber),  and  Leslie  A.  Mead  did  the 
marvelous  artifact  drawings.  Kurt  Faust  of  the  NPS  Eastern  Archeological  Field  Laboratory,  Cha "lestown, 
Massachusetts,  drew  the  figures  that  appear  in  Chapter  12,  apart  from  three  of  the  pollen  diagrams  drawn  by 
Leslie  Mead.. 

This  report  simply  would  not  have  made  it  out  of  Beaudry's  computer,  where  it  seemed  determine  to 
remain  while  feeding  on  endless  revisions  and  editorial  changes,  if  it  had  not  been  for  the  wonderful 
production  support  of  David  Dutton  and  David  Landon  of  Boston  University,  assisted  by  Allison  Dwyer  and 
Nora  Sheehan  of  the  University  of  Massachusetts,  Boston. 

Although  it  does  not  figure  into  this  report,  we'd  like  to  mention  that  we  are  grateful  to  Linda  Towle  of  the 
NPS  Eastern  Archeological  Field  Lab  for  her  patient  instruction,  especially  to  Leslie  Mead,  in  the  complexities 
of  the  Park  Service  Archeological  Collections  Management  Project  computer  data  entry  system.  We  also 
appreciate  Larry  Todd's  help  with  Dbase  III  and  the  ACMP  system,  which  has  thus  far  proved  wholly 
incompatible  with  our  SAS  files.! 

Technical  support  equipment  for  palynology  was  provided  by  National  Science  Foundation  Grant  BNS- 
7924470.  Anne  Yentsch  offered  provocative  insight  into  the  meaning  of  the  Lowell  boardinghouse  system. 
Last,  but  certainly  not  least,  Lillian  Zabarsky,  of  the  Boston  University  Office  of  Public  Archaeology,  deserves 
thanks  for  her  splendid  work  as  bookkeeper. 


Chapter  1 

INTRODUCTION 

by  Mary  C.  Beaudry 


This  is  the  third  and  final  volume  in  the  series 
of  reports  on  the  Boston  University/National 
Park  Service  cooperative,  interdisciplinary  study 
of  the  Boott  Mills  in  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  It 
presents  the  results  of  documentary  and 
archeological  research  and  analysis  as  well  as 
our  interpretations  of  the  evidence;  the  focus  is 
on  boardinghouse  keepers  and  boardinghouse 
residents. 

As  our  research  and  analysis  proceeded,  it 
became  increasingly  clear  that  the 
boardinghouses  in  Lowell  were  very  much  part 
of  a  system  and  must  be  approached, 
understood,  and  interpreted  as  such.  The 
boardinghouse  system,  engendered  by  the 
policy  of  corporate  paternalism,  had  a  pervasive 
influence  on  the  lives  of  all  those  who  lived  in 
corporate  housing.  It  further  influenced  how 
boardinghouse  keepers  ran  their  houses,  local 
businesses  marketed  their  goods,  and  politicians 
developed  city  ordinances  and  municipal  policy. 
Ultimately  it  affected — and  accounts  for — the 
nature  of  the  archeological  record  of  sites  such 
as  the  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse  backlots. 

The  boardinghouse  system  may  represent  a 
pattern  for  corporate  housing,  but  it  is  a  pattern 
that  differs  as  dramatically  from  private 
boarding  as  it  does  from  normal — if  such  a  term 
can  ever  be  used  with  accuracy — domestic 
arrangements  (i.e.,  nuclear  families).  The  Lowell 
boardinghouse  system  fostered  a  way  of  life  that 
contrasted  starkly  with  life  in  rural  America,  but 
it  was  a  way  of  life  that  became  common  in 
industrial  cities  as  the  19th  century  progressed. 

That  the  Lowell  system  was  effective  in 
meeting  managerial  goals  is  evident  in  the  fact 
that,  with  minor  modifications,  it  was  widely 
adopted  throughout  New  England  (see  Clancey, 
this  volume).  This  "system"  was  a  bounded 
arena  which,  despite  its  seeming  rigidity,  left 
openings  for  workers  to  operate  creatively. 
Workers  found  room  for  individual  choice  and 
self-expression  where  they  could,  inventing  and 
constructing  a  working-class  culture  in 
contradistinction  to  middle-class  mores  and 
lifestyles.  Oftentimes  it  is  from  the  residues  of 
daily  existence — in  the  artifacts  of  everyday  life 
and  leisure — that  we  recover  evidence  of  such 
adaptation  and  self-expression.  Hence  there  are 
two  themes  throughout  this  volume:  the 
boardinghouse  system  and  its  effects,  direct  or 


otherwise,  on  workers'  lives;  and  workers' 
response  to  the  conditions  engendered  by  the 
system.  Both  perspectives  are  essential  to  a  full 
comprehension  of  how  the  boardinghouse 
system  truly  became  a  way  of  life. 


Theoretical  Perspective 

Our  research  for  the  Boott  Mills  project  has 
been  characterized  by  integrated, 
interdisciplinary  archeology  with  an  interpretive 
analytical  approach.  We  have  sought  to  provide 
a  detailed,  contextual  examination  of  selected 
Boott  Mills  housing  units  as  the  basis  for  offering 
broader  observations  about  life  in  urban- 
industrial  communities.  Our  definition  of 
context  includes  cultural/historical  context  as 
well  as  environmental  context.  This  involves 
consideration  of  peoples'  attitudes  and  beliefs  in 
addition  to  their  actions.  It  goes  without  saying 
that  documentary  analysis  (in  addition  and  in 
distinction  to  'historical  research')  is  integral  to 
such  a  study,  and  we  contend  that  it  is  in  fact  a 
vital  element  in  all  historical  archeological 
research. 

Interpretive  approaches  in  anthropology  are 
characterized  by  attention  to  belief  systems  or 
world  views  and  by  a  concern  for  meaning  within 
its  cultural  and  historical  contexts;  culture  is 
seen  as  meaningfully  constituted,  cultural  facts 
as  observations  subject  to  multiple 
interpretations  (cf.  Geertz  1973;  Leach  1982; 
Taylor  1979;  Yentsch  n.d.a,  n.d.b,  1988a,  1988b, 
1988c,  1989;  Yentsch  et  al.  1987).  Yentsch  (n.d.a: 
7)  notes  that  in  interpretive  studies 

The  focus  is  on  historical  moments  and  repetitive 
events  that  convey  information  about  a  specific 
culture.  The  emphasis  is  on  small-scaled  and 
detailed  examinations  of  specific,  varied 
expressions  of  cultural  meaning,  on  a  small  range  of 
human  activity  that  tells  of  ordinary  social  action, 
on  the  day-to-day  behavior  that  in  its 
particularity  and  complex  texture  reveals  the 
meaning  that  gave  form  to  peoples'  lives  in  a  given 
time  and  place. 

Attention  to  historical  and  cultural  context 
allows  human  beings  an  active  role  in  creating 
meaning  and  in  shaping  the  world  around  them; 
they  are  seen  to  interact  with  their  environment 
rather  than  simply  react  to  it.  Material  culture  is 
viewed  as  a   medium  of  communication  and 


2   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a   Way  of  Life 


expression  that  can   condition  and   at  times 
control  social  action. 

An  interpretive  approach  in  historical 
archeology  seeks  to  examine  a  site  from  as  many 
aspects  as  possible;  Yentsch  (n.d.a:  7)  offers  the 
analogy  of  an  optical  prism,  which  captures  and 
refracts  a  continuous  spectrum  of  light, 
permitting  analysis  of  its  constituents.  Study  of 
minute  details  of  a  site  from  a  variety  of 
perspectives  builds  both  toward  total, 
comprehensive  description  and  toward 
interpretation  of  meaning.  In  this  way  one  is 
able  to  construct  a  balanced  and  holistic  picture 
of  a  site. 

Our  investigations  of  the  Boott  Mills  has  both 
adopted  and  adapted  the  approach  outlined 
above.  We  have  labeled  our  approach 
"contextual,"  citing  Hodder's  (1987a,  1987b) 
definition  of  context  as  cultural  and  historical 
while  drawing  heavily  on  Butzer's  (1980,  1982) 
notion  of  ecological  context.  The  first  sort  of 
context  is  constructed  through  extensive, 
detailed  documentary  research  involving  as 
broad  a  range  of  sources  as  possible  (e.g., 
primary  and  secondary  documents,  oral  history, 
surviving  artifacts  and  buildings,  etc.),  the 
second  through  our  interdisciplinary  studies  of 
the  archeological  record  aimed  at  recovering 
environmental  as  well  as  more  obvious  sorts  of 
archeological  data.  Integrating  the  two  notions 
of  context  has  led  us  away  from  ecological 
functionalism  and  has  given  us  insight  into 
Lowell's  evolving  urban  landscape  as  both  a 
cultural  and  natural  phenomenon.  It  also  has 
suggested  how  to  go  about  interpreting  it  in  light 
of  the  meaning  it  held  for  its  inhabitants  and  the 
effects  it  had  on  their  daily  lives. 

We  contend  that  exploration  of  peoples' 
attitudes  toward  the  world  around  them  is  an 
integral  part  of  the  recovery  of  meaning  as  well 
as  of  explanation  of  the  archeological  record. 
Historical  archeologists  have  the  means  at  hand 
to  inject  into  their  etic,  objective  studies  of  the 
past  an  emic,  culturally  sensitive  perspective; 
interpretive  analysis,  with  its  concern  for 
meaning  and  for  folk  classification  and 
perception,  offers  a  framework  for  textual 
analysis  aimed  at  recovering  folk  meaning.  It 
does  so  by  taking  an  analytical  and  ethnographic 
approach  to  documents,  an  approach  labeled 
variously  "historical  ethnography"  (cf.  Yentsch 
1975;  Schuyler  1988)  and  "documentary 
archaeology"  (cf.  Beaudry  1988). 

In  essence,  what  we  seek  is  the  "full  and 
inclusive  context"  Taylor  indicated  should  be 
our  primary  interest  (Taylor  1967:  32).  As 
Schmidt  and  Mrozowski  note  (1983:  146),  "the 
construction  of  cultural  context  is  the  way  in 


which  cultural  meaning  may  be  added  to 
archeology  and  to  any  patterns  that  may  be 
deduced  from  archeological  evidence."  We 
have  attempted  in  our  documentary  research  to 
establish  such  a  cultural  context,  believing  that 

we  must  carefully  research  different  historical 
documents  and  the  literature  of  history  to  derive 
constructs  that  can  be  synthesized  to  build  a 
complex  cultural  context  for  our  archaeological 
excavation,  be  it  a  shipwreck,  an  Iron  Age  factory 
site  in  Tanzania,  or  a  colonial  privy  ...  If  we  fail 
to  do  this,  then  we  overlook  cultural  contexts  that 
tell  us  most  about  behavior  (Schmidt  and 
Mrozowski  1983: 147). 

Despite  criticism  by  nay-sayers  such  as  Leone 
(1988a)  and  Leone  and  Potter  (1988a:  14-18),  this 
sort  of  approach  does  not  confuse  the 
documentary  record  with  the  ethnographic 
record  or  render  it  equivalent  to  it;  rather,  it 
permits  a  critical,  interpretive,  and  culturally 
sensitive  approach  to  historical  documents  with 
the  aim  of  avoiding  over-objectification  of  its 
subject  matter.  And  while  some  perhaps  are 
tempted  to  extend  to  such  an  approach  the 
dismissive  label  'eclecticism'  (e.g.,  Orser  1988: 
314-315),  it  can  be  said  in  its  favor  that  an 
interpretive  approach,  because  it  is  receptive  to 
differing  perspectives,  manages  to  avoid  the 
pitfalls  of  the  doctrinaire  application  of  modern 
liberal  political  thought  inherent  in  what  Orser 
and  others  propose  as  a  more  "unified"  (rigid?) 
theoretical  perspective  (i.e.,  marxism,  critical 
theory,  etc.). 


Research  Framework 

Our  expectation  was  that  the  research  design 
developed  for  the  Lowell  Boott  Mills  Study  would 
serve  as  the  vehicle  for  a  truly  comprehensive 
interdisciplinary  approach  to  historical 
archeology.  Our  aim  was  to  go  beyond  the 
limited  use  of  documentary  sources  and 
materials  and  environmental  analysis  common 
in  the  discipline.  Our  goal  was  to  exploit  as  wide 
a  range  of  analytical  techniques  as  possible, 
including  them  as  integral  elements  of  the 
project.  In  our  first  report  (Beaudry  and 
Mrozowski  1987a:  5),  we  contended  that  the  end 
product  of  a  truly  interdisciplinary  project 
should  not  be  a  collection  of  unrelated, 
independently  produced  specialists'  reports 
(often  tacked  on  as  undigested  appendices)  but 
rather  a  comprehensive  report  of  closely  related 
research  efforts  focused  on  common  goals.  We 
sought  to  develop  sampling  strategies  best 
suited  to  the  recovery  of  information  relevant  to 
the  overall  project  goals,  and  we  delineated  the 
contributions  that  each  analytical  or  research 


Introduction  3 


procedure  could  make  to  these  overall  goals, 
taking  into  consideration  the  interrelationships 
among  the  different  specialties. 

As  we  went  along,  we  learned  from  our 
mistakes  and  omissions,  refining  our  sampling 
designs  and  methods  of  analysis.  As  a  result,  in 
addition  to  what  they  can  offer  in  the  way  of 
insight  into  the  Boott  Mills  of  Lowell,  members 
of  the  project  team  have  developed  and  applied 
new  techniques  and  approaches  that  constitute 
significant  contributions  to  the  archeologist's 
repertoire  and  have  applicability  beyond  the 
present  project. 

To  guide  our  research  and  analysis,  we 
identified  a  series  of  problem  orientations  and 
research  issues  we  hoped  to  explore,  delineating 
a  number  of  subareas  falling  under  the  general 
headings  of  residential  and  industrial  issues. 
The  notion  was  that  each  of  these  could  be 
addressed  through  archeological  data  in 
combination  with  documentary  evidence,  oral 
histories,  and  material  culture  research.  In  most 
areas,  we  have  been  successful  beyond  our 
greatest  hopes,  but  in  certain  areas  we  have 
fallen  short  of  our  expectations.  What  follows  is 
a  brief  review  of  the  issues  we  hoped  to  explore 
along  with  a  preliminary  evaluation  of  the 
relative  success  of  our  efforts. 


Residential  Problem   Focus 

The  first  subarea  we  identified  within  the 
residential  problem  focus  was  architecture.  The 
built  environment  of  Lowell,  especially  workers' 
housing,  represented  at  once  corporate 
investment  in  providing  for  and  controlling  the 
work  force  as  well  as  the  arenas  for  workers' 
private  lives  and  leisure  activities.  To  provide  a 
basis  for  understanding  the  Boott  housing  from 
both  perspectives,  Gregory  Clancey  (1987a) 
investigated  the  architectural  history  of  the 
Boott  Mills  boardinghouse  blocks,  reviewing 
differences  between  housing  for  operatives  and 
supervisors  and  delineating  changes  in  the 
housing  over  time.  The  latter  aspect  of  the 
architectural  history  proved  especially  useful  in 
developing  a  program  of  archeological 
investigation  at  the  boardinghouse  site. 

At  the  outset  we  knew  far  less,  however,  about 
the  internal  arrangement  of  workers'  living 
quarters  and  about  the  use  of  enclosed  yard 
areas  immediately  behind  the  workers'  housing. 
The  archeology,  as  well  as  much  of  the 
documentary  research  for  this  project,  have 
been  aimed  at  shedding  light  on  these  issues. 

At  the  outset,  we  also  knew  very  little  about  the 
nature  and  quality  of  the  material  life  and  diet  of 
mill  workers.     Our  study  of  the  Boott  Mills 


boardinghouses  has  focused  to  a  considerable 
degree  on  the  topic  of  foodways.  Our  interest 
was  in  the  entire  foodways  system,  including 
types  and  quantities  of  foodstuffs,  food  purchase 
and  procurement,  food  preparation,  dining 
habits,  and  possible  social  and  ethnic  variation 
in  dietary  patterns  (Landon  1987a,  b).  We  have 
been  able  to  compare  workers'  foodways  with 
those  of  mill  supervisory  personnel,  using 
deposits  from  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House 
(Landon  1987b;  Beaudry  and  Mrozowski  1987b). 

The  analysis  of  material  culture  relates  to  the 
study  of  consumer  behavior  among  workers, 
supervisors,  and,  most  pointedly,  boardinghouse 
keepers.  This  fact  helps  to  underscore  the 
effects  of  the  policy  of  corporate  paternalism  on 
the  lives  of  mill  workers,  because  boardinghouse 
residents  owned  only  their  own  clothing  and 
personal  effects;  they  were  not  in  control  of 
many  other  aspects  of  their  everyday  material 
lives.  The  environment  in  which  they  lived  and 
worked  was  created  and  controlled  by  others;  the 
boardinghouse  keepers,  who  like  the  mill  owners 
were  engaged  in  a  profit-making  enterprise, 
exercised  control  over  the  domestic 
environment.  Workers  were  not  directly 
involved  in  the  choice  of  the  furnishings  of  their 
surroundings,  of  the  food  they  ate,  and  even  of 
the  sorts  of  dishes,  glassware,  and  cutlery  with 
which  they  ate  and  from  which  they  drank.  Thus 
the  early  decades  of  Lowell  present  us  with  a 
truly  corporate  pattern  of  consumption  and 
lifestyle.  (Our  rationale  for  viewing 
boardinghouses  as  corporate  households  is 
offered  in  Chapter  5.) 

Matters  of  health  and  hygiene,  including 
waste  and  water  management  facilities,  have 
formed  part  of  our  study  of  the  Boott 
boardinghouses  because  we  feel  that  these 
reflect,  perhaps  far  more  truthfully  than  stated 
company  policy,  a  corporate  ideology  that 
sought  to  control  workers'  lives  without  taking 
ultimate  responsibility  for  them  (e.g.,  Bell  1987a; 
Mrozowski  et  al.  1989).  As  it  turns  out  and  as  will 
become  clear  throughout  this  report,  these 
concerns  are  linked  to  almost  every  aspect  of  our 
study  and  perhaps  form  its  strongest  common 
theme. 

We  noted  that  space  becomes  a  commodity 
in  urban  contexts,  its  use — as  well  as  its 
creation — reflecting  the  evolution  and  growth  of 
a  city.  Urban  land  use  has  increasingly  occupied 
the  attention  of  urban  and  industrial  historians 
(e.g.,  Hershberg  1981:  3-35;  Hohenberg  and  Lees 
1985:  290-330;  Lampard  1985: 194-249, 1983: 3-53; 
Davison  1983:  349-370:  Warner  1962).  We  have 
considered  the  built  environment  of  the  Boott 
Mills  and  its  housing  as  reflective  of  corporate 


4  The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


ideology  and  corporate  response  to  changing 
technology  and  fluctuating  profitability.  Several 
aspects  of  our  research  coalesced  in  an  analysis 
of  the  evolution  of  the  urban,  industrial 
landscape  in  Lowell  (e.g.,  Beaudry  1987,  1989; 
Fisher  and  Kelso  1987;  Mrozowski  and  Beaudry 
1989).  In  this  volume,  we  turn  to  a  close 
examination  of  the  use  of  boardinghouse 
backlots  and  offer  interpretations  of  how  those 
spaces  served  the  needs  of  boardinghouse  and 
tenement  residents. 


that  working  class  leisure  behavior  must  be 
studied  from  a  vantage  point  that  considers  both 
work  and  non-work  time.  Industrial  ecology  and 
the  ideology  of  industrial  capitalism  reached 
well  beyond  the  workplace  and  affected  the  non- 
working  hours  of  those  who  lived  in  mill  housing; 
our  research  has  brought  to  light  many 
examples  of  just  how  pervasive  the  influences  of 
conditions  in  the  workplace  and  the  policy  of 
corporate  paternalism  were  in  workers'  lives. 


Industrial  Problem   Focus 

Our  plan  to  examine  of  the  industrial  complex 
that  comprised  the  Boott  Mill  Corporation  from 
both  documentary  and  archeological 
perspectives,  intended  to  contribute  to  an 
overall  understanding  of  corporate  attitudes 
toward  labor,  production,  and  technology,  has 
not  come  about.  This  in  large  measure  is 
because  we  could  not  hope  to  surpass  Mahlstadt 
and  George's  fine  work  conducted  during  recent 
renovations  to  Boott  Mill  #6  (Mahlstadt  and 
George  1988).  Their  report  reveals  that 
archeological  evidence  of  changes  over  time  in 
the  physical  layout  of  the  millyard  survive,  albeit 
often  in  highly  mutilated  form,  and  can 
contribute  to  our  knowledge  of  the  changing 
appearance  of  the  millyard.  Alterations  to  the 
millyard  landscape  (revealed,  e.g.,  by  features 
such  as  curbing  and  evidence  for  earlier  grade 
levels),  in  addition  to  architectural  changes  of 
the  mills  themselves,  came  about  in  direct 
response  to  technological  innovations  that 
increased  production  and  hence  profits  for 
corporate  stockholders  (cf.  Gross  1988;  Gross  and 
Wright  1985).  It  is  clear  that  such  modifications 
to  the  work  environment  served  also  to  alter  the 
relationship  between  workers  and  machines. 

This  relationship,  and  the  nature  of  the  work 
environment  (temperature,  humidity,  noise, 
toxicity)  as  a  whole,  has  been  termed  industrial 
ecology.  "Changes  wrought  in  the  material 
environment  of  production"  must  be  carefully 
delineated  in  order  to  provide  a  "comprehensive 
picture  of  the  daily  routines"  that  workers 
performed.  Hence,  an  industrial  ecological 
approach  aims  to  "merge  an  account  of  the 
worker's  tasks  with  description  of  a  particular 
workplace  and  its  equipment"  (Lcary  1979:  178). 
Although  our  proposed  excavations  in  the 
millyard  did  not  come  about,  we  have  remained 
alert  to  what  Gareth  Stcdman  Jones  points  to  as 
the  primacy  of  work:  "the  social  relations  within 
which  it  is  carried  on,  in  the  determination  of 
class  position  and  in  the  articulation  of  class 
attitudes"  (Jones  1977:  170).   Jones  further  notes 


The  Present  Volume 

In  the  12  chapters  that  follow,  aspects  of  the 
boardinghouse  system  in  Lowell  are  examined 
from  a  variety  of  perspectives  and  at  differing 
scales,  ranging  from  tiny  sherds  and  microscopic 
pollen  grains  to  entire  structures  and  to  the 
urban  environment  as  a  whole.  The 
corporation's  point  of  view  as  well  as  worker 
response  to  it  are  considered,  through 
documentary  analysis  and  through  detailed 
analysis  and  interpretation  of  boardinghouse 
material  culture.  Archeological  methods  and 
sampling  techniques  are  discussed  as  well. 
Although  much  of  the  raw  data  appear  in  tables 
throughout  the  text,  certain  classes  of 
information  are  merely  referenced  in  the  text 
and  appear  in  full  as  appendices  on  microfiche. 
These  are  the  Boott  correspondence  (Appendix 
A),  the  ceramic  vessel  count  (Appendix  B),  the 
catalog  of  faunal  remains  (Appendix  C),  the 
results  of  soil  chemistry  analysis,  and  the  artifact 
catalog  (Appendix  E). 

In  Chapter  2,  Gregory  K.  Clancey  broadens  his 
earlier  investigation  of  Boott  housing  by  tracing 
the  evolution  of  the  Boott  boardinghouse  plan 
and  its  spread  beyond  the  city  of  Lowell.  Of 
special  relevance  to  the  present  study  is 
Clancey's  discussion  of  the  technological 
limitations  imposed  on  residents  of  a  Boott-type 
boardinghouse  by  the  very  nature  of  its 
floorplan,  internal  arrangement  of  space,  and 
provisions  for  access  and  egress,  cooking, 
heating  and  lighting,  and  so  forth. 

Chapter  3,  by  Kathleen  H.  Bond,  offers  an 
analysis  of  a  series  of  letters  drawn  from  a  late 
19th-century  Boott  Mills  company 
correspondence  book.  Bond  uses  these  letters, 
written  on  behalf  of  the  company  to  mill 
operatives  and  boardinghouse  keepers,  to 
examine  company  policy  and  attitudes  toward 
workers.  She  is  able  to  demonstrate  through 
these  revealing  documents  the  extent  to  which 
the  corporations  continued  their  attempts  to 
control  worker  behavior  away  from  the 
workplace  long  after  the  policy  of  corporate 
paternalism  lost  its  initial  vigor. 


Introduction   5 


The  focus  shifts  from  company-worker 
relations  to  boardinghouse  keepers  in  Chapter  4, 
by  David  B.  Landon.  Here  Landon  explores  the 
link  between  the  19th-century  concept  of 
domestic  ideology  and  boardinghouse  keeping 
as  suitable  woman's  work  and  discusses  exactly 
what  services  keepers  were  expected  to  provide 
their  boarders.  He  further  investigates  how  the 
Lowell  boardinghouse  system  provided  an 
economic  environment  particularly  conducive  to 
making  a  profit  as  a  boardinghouse  keeper,  and 
by  delineating  the  constraints  of  this  economic 
situation,  provides  the  backdrop  for  interpreting 
food-related  remains  recovered  from  the 
boardinghouse  yards. 

Results  of  excavations  in  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse  and  tenement  backlots  are 
presented  in  Chapter  5,  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and 
Stephen  A.  Mrozowski.  Beaudry  and  Mrozowski 
attempt  to  place  the  Lowell  excavations  in  the 
context  of  the  archeology  of  urban  houselots  in 
general  and  of  boardinghouse  living  in 
particular.  The  notion  that  this  is  'household 
archeology  with  a  difference'  is  based  on  the 
authors'  model  of  the  boardinghouse  as  a 
corporate  household.  This  model  forms  the 
basis  for  interpreting  both  the  archeological 
remains  and  the  artifacts  recovered  from  the 
backlots. 

The  first  category  of  material  culture  to  be 
examined  in  detail  is  ceramics.  Chapter  6,  by 
David  H.  Dutton,  presents  the  results  of  the 
analysis  of  the  ceramic  assemblage  from  the  site 
as  well  as  a  descriptive  catalog  of  makers'  marks. 
The  ceramic  study  points  to  subtle  differences  in 
ceramic  purchase  and  use  by  members  of 
corporate  (boardinghouse)  versus  nuclear 
(tenement)  households.  Dutton  is  able  to  make 
such  fine-grained  distinctions  because  he 
applies  a  wide  variety  of  analytical  techniques 
(e.g.,  vessel  counts,  economic  scaling,  decorative 
analysis,  etc.)  to  his  material.  The  results  serve 
to  demonstrate  anew  just  how  sensitive  ceramics 
can  be,  not  only  as  indicators  of  status  and  class 
as  well  as  of  variation  within  social  groups,  but 
also  as  reflections  of  peoples'  aspirations  and 
notions  of  proper  behavior  (cf.  Beaudry  1984a; 
Bograd  1989;  Herman  1982;  Stone  1988). 

In  Chapter  7,  Kathleen  H.  Bond  provides  an 
interpretive  analysis  of  the  bottle  glass  from  the 
Boott  backlots.  She  is  able  to  show  that, 
although  in  large  measure  selection  of 
medicinal  and  beverage  products  by  workers 
tended  to  be  governed  by  a  need  to  economize, 
other  factors,  possibly  including  deliberate 
flauting  of  company  rules,  played  a  significant 
role  in  the  purchase  and  disposal  of  beverage 
alcohol  containers. 


Grace  H.  Ziesing's  analysis  of  personal  effects 
from  the  backlot  deposits,  Chapter  8,  provides 
interesting  insight  into  items  such  as  buttons, 
clothing  fasteners,  costume  jewelry,  hair  combs, 
etc.,  both  in  terms  of  production  technology  (and 
hence  date  of  production)  as  well  as  in 
behavioral  terms.  This  material,  perhaps 
moreso  than  any  other  category  of  artifact 
recovered  from  the  site,  can  in  part  be  directly 
attributed  to  women  in  terms  of  selection,  use, 
and,  presumably,  discard,  and  Ziesing  offers 
limited  interpretations  about  this  connection. 

David  B.  Landon  offers  a  comprehensive 
analysis  of  the  faunal  assemblage  from  the 
backlots  in  Chapter  9.  He  offers  interpretations 
about  food-related  issues,  such  as  butchery 
patterns  and  food  preparation  techniques,  as 
well  as  about  taphonomic  processes  affecting 
the  assemblage — rodent  activity  in  particular. 
He  is  able  to  show  that  while  certain  features  of 
the  assemblage  speak  to  issues  germane  to 
boardinghouse  foodways,  in  many  regards  they 
can  also  be  seen  as  reflective  of  urban  faunal 
deposits  in  general. 

Chapter  10,  by  Lauren  J.  Cook,  is  a  descriptive 
catalog  of  the  tobacco-related  material  culture 
from  the  backlots.  In  Chapter  11,  Cook  uses  this 
material  as  the  springboard  for  a  discussion  of 
the  symbolic  aspects  of  smoking  behavior  and  of 
the  role  it  plays  in  the  construction  of  working 
class  culture. 

In  Chapter  12,  Gerald  K.  Kelso,  William  F. 
Fisher,  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski,  and  Karl  J. 
Reinhard  provide  a  series  of  reports  on  the 
environmental  analyses  performed  on  the  site 
matrices:  pollen,  soil  chemistry,  macrofossil, 
parasitological,  and  phytolith  analysis.  These 
are  summarized  and  synthesized  to  provide  a 
comprehensive  interpretation  of  formation 
processes,  natural  and  cultural,  and  the 
archeological  record  of  the  site. 

In  the  concluding  chapter,  Mrozowski  and 
Beaudry  summarize  the  results  of  the  project 
and  discuss  the  contributions  the  research  has 
made  to  our  understanding  of  material  life  in  the 
context  of  the  boardinghouse  system. 


6  The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Chapter  2 

THE  ORIGIN  OF  THE  BOOTT  BOARDINGHOUSE  PLAN 
AND  ITS  FATE  AFTER  1836 

by  Gregory  K.  Clancey 


Introduction 

The  aim  of  this  chapter  is  to  locate  the  Boott 
boardinghouses  within  the  architectural  history 
of  corporation  housing  in  the  "Waltham 
system"  towns  (cf.  Candee  1981,  1985).  The 
objective  is  not  to  present  a  general  survey  of 
corporation  housing,  but  to  trace  the  evolution  of 
the  particular  configuration  of  the  original  Boott 
blocks.  Recognizing  that  alternatives  to  the 
Boott  configuration  existed  within  the  Waltham 
system,  it  nonetheless  appears  that  the  design  of 
boardinghouse  blocks  (i.e.,  the  grouping  of  units, 
the  elevations,  and  the  floor  plans  of  units)  was 
standardized  by  Lowell's  Proprietors  of  Locks 
and  Canals  in  the  late  1820s  and  applied  to  all 
mill-building  campaigns  in  Lowell  throughout 
the  late  1830s.  Elements  of  this  standardized 
design  continued  to  appear  in  textile  corporation 
housing  in  Lowell  and  elsewhere  at  least  as  late 
as  the  1850s. 


Origin  of  the  Plan 

The  earliest  corporation  houses  built  in  Lowell 
were  21/2  story  duplexes  erected  by  1825  for  the 
Merrimack  Corporation  and  the  Lowell  Machine 
Shop  (Figure  2-1).  These  were  detached  from 
one  another,  and  each  had  its  own  ell.  A  Locks 
and  Canals  plan  of  January,  1824,  shows  that  the 
same  scheme  of  multiple  duplexes  was  intended 
to  service  the  as-yet  unbuilt  Hamilton  and 
Appleton  Mills.  A  map  of  the  following  year, 
however,  illustrates  two  long  boardinghouse 
blocks  on  land  of  the  Hamilton  Corporation, 
whose  mills  were  then  under  construction. 
Another  Locks  and  Canals  plan,  of  January,  1826, 
projects  the  site  of  the  future  Lawrence, 
Tremont,  and  Suffolk  mills  as  filled  with  long 
boardinghouse  blocks. 

In  Mill  and  Mansion,  author  John  Coolidge 
(1942:  33-39)  includes  a  photograph  of  a 
Merrimack  Corporation  2  1/2  story  brick  block 
on  Dutton  Street  that  he  dates  to  ca.  1825.  This 
block  is  illustrated  on  Mather's  1832  Lowell  map, 
which  also  depicts  two  potential  mates  on 
Worthen  Street  (Figure  2-2).  A  much  longer 
one-story  brick  block  was  also  constructed  on 


Prince  Street  by  the  Merrimack  Corporation  in 
1827  (Candee  1985:  38;  Coolidge  1942:  33-39; 
Figure  2-3).  The  Dutton  Street  block  contained 
four  units  under  a  simple  pitched  roof.  Each  unit 
was  three  bays  wide,  and  the  block  was  arranged 
so  that  the  kitchens  and  parlors  of  each  pair 
could  abut  and  thus  be  serviced  by  common 
chimney  stacks.  When  the  builders  planned  the 
rows,  economy  in  chimney  stacks  rather  than 
aesthetics  determined  on  which  side  of  each  unit 
the  front  hall  was  to  be  located  and  hence  where 
the  front  door  would  occur  on  the  faqade. 

Thus  by  1825,  Locks  and  Canals  had  clearly 
rejected  the  duplex  in  favor  of  the  block  or  row. 
This  renovation  was  to  be  expected,  as  economy 
was  a  major  corporate  concern.  A  block  was 
cheaper  to  build  than  duplexes,  as  it  required 
only  one  foundation,  fewer  walls  and  chimneys, 
and  fewer  windows.  It  also  occupied  less  land 
and  presumably  required  less  fuel  in  the  winter 
because  of  the  shared  chimney  stacks  and  party 
walls.  The  only  disadvantages  were  perhaps 
aesthetic,  but  the  corporations  did  have  the 
precedent  of  the  urban  row-house.  Perhaps 
more  significantly,  the  brick  college  dormitory  of 
the  type  found  at  Harvard,  to  which  the 
perfected  Lowell  boardinghouse  block  bore  a 
strong  resemblance,  provided  a  precedent  with 
overtones  of  cloistered,  academic  lifestyles 
(Figure  2-4). 

While  the  Merrimack's  Dutton  Street  block 
was  2  1/2  stories  tall,  the  five  blocks  erected  by 
the  Hamilton  Corporation  from  ca.  1825  onward 
was  more  ambitious.  A  ca.  1912  photograph  by 
George  Kenngott  of  the  now-demolished 
Webster  Street  block  shows  a  3  1/2  story  brick 
building  with  six  boardinghouse  units  and  single 
tenements  at  either  end  (Kenngott  1912:  fig.  24)). 
The  dormers  shown  in  the  photograph  are  20th- 
century  additions.  These  blocks  were  probably 
the  first  in  Lowell  of  this  height  and  length,  which 
would  henceforth  be  standard.  Unlike  later 
examples,  however,  the  Hamilton  blocks  had  2 
1/2  stories  end  tenements  slightly  narrower  in 
width  and  with  different  floor-to-ceiling  heights 
than  the  central  boardinghouse  sections.  The 
tenements  also  had  exposed  granite  foundation 
trim,  while  the  boardinghouses  were  all  brick 


8    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


i     t  ■»  ■    a 


■ 
w  m 

■ 

n 

i 

■  SIS  ■ 

a  MR  ■ 

■ 

■ 

■ 

■ 

i 

n 

1      11      "1 

jr  m  n 

3 

HI 

■ 

1 

H 

■ 

m 

5V 


\      ^ 


■ 


Figure  2-1.  Detail  of  1825  Lowell  map  showing  duplexes  belonging  to  the  Merrimack 
Company.  From  "A  Plan  of  the  Land  and  Buildings  belonging  to  the  Merrimack 
Manufacturing  Company..."  made  in  1825  by  Geo.  R.  Baldwin.  (Courtesy  of  the  Lowell 
National  Historical  Park.) 


above  grade.  These  changes  in  articulation 
reflected  not  only  different  uses  but  differences 
in  worker  status  between  the  occupants  of  the 
boardinghouses  and  tenements. 


Evolution  and  Adaptation 

The  concept  of  the  3  1/2  story  brick  block  may 
not  have  originated  in  Lowell.  Between  1824  and 
1826,  five  3  1/2  story  brick  blocks  of  four 
boardinghouses  each  were  constructed  in  Great 
Falls,  later  Somersworth,  New  Hampshire 
(Candee  1985:  39).  These  blocks  were  serviced 
by  a  continuous,  detached  one-story  shed 
behind  their  rear  yards,  a  characteristic  of  Lowell 
and  later  Waltham  system  boardinghouses. 
They  differed  markedly  from  the  Lowell  blocks 
in  certain  elevation  details,  however,  and  based 
upon  their  fenestration  pattern,  some  aspects  of 
their  floor  plan  must  have  differed  as  well.  More 
research  would  be  needed  to  determine  the 
exact  chronological  relationship  between  these 
blocks  and  those  at  Lowell,  or  the  possibility  of 
direct  influences. 

The  Lowell  boardinghouse  block  only  reached 
its  mature  form  with  the  construction  of  the 
three  Appleton  Corporation  blocks  of  ca.  1828. 
Like  the  Hamilton  blocks,  those  of  the  Appleton 
each  contained  six  3  1/2  story  boardinghouses 
three  bays  wide,  whose  party  walls  were  topped 
by  joined  chimney  stacks.    The  Appleton  end 


tenements,  however,  were  doubled,  pushed  up 
to  3  1/2  stories,  and  otherwise  made  to  appear 
integral  with  the  rest  of  the  block.  They  also  had 
a  series  of  small  dormers  along  the  roof  and  full 
double-hung  sash  windows  in  the  gable  ends  of 
the  attic.  The  Hamilton  block  lacked  this  later 
feature  and  may  have  lacked  the  former, 
judging  from  the  early  20th-century  dormers 
that  appear  in  the  Kenngott  photograph.  This 
Appleton  boardinghouse  configuration,  with 
such  slight  modifications  as  the  depth  of  the  end 
tenements,  the  number  of  boardinghouses  to  a 
block,  and  the  number  and  placement  of 
dormers,  would  henceforth  serve  Locks  and 
Canals  as  a  standard  model,  up  to  and  including 
construction  of  the  Boott  and  Massachusetts 
complexes  to  the  later  1830s.  Boardinghouses 
with  the  Appleton's  characteristic  massing  and 
elevations  will  hereafter  be  referred  to  as  being 
of  the  "Appleton  type." 

As  only  two  sets  of  plans  survive  for  Appleton- 
type  boardinghouses,  those  of  the  Suffolk  (ca. 
1833)  and  Boott  Corporations  (Figures  2-5,  2-6), 
it  is  not  known  whether  the  type  was  further 
defined  by  a  single  floor  plan  and  what  relation 
this  plan  had  to  the  earlier  Hamilton  and 
Merrimack  blocks.  The  fact  that  the  Suffolk  and 
Boott  plans  are  virtually  identical,  however,  is 
strong  evidence  that  Locks  and  Canals  had  a 
common  plan  to  accompany  their  common 
elevation  drawings.  The  only  elevations  of  an 
Appleton-type  set  of  blocks  that  clearly  suggest 
modification  of  the  Suffolk/Boott  plan  are  those 


The  Boott  Boardinghouse  Plan  9 


II.  Lowell  and  Belvidere  Village  -  1832  -  by  Benjamin  Mather 


Collection  of  the  Lowell  Historical  Society 


Figure  2-2.   1832  map  of  Lowell  depicting  brick  boardinghouse  blocks  built  by  the 
Merrimack  Corporation  along  Dutton  Street.  (Courtesy  of  the  Lowell  Historical 
Society.) 


10  The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  2-3.  John  Coolidge  photograph  of  a  later  Merrimack  Company  brick  housing 
block  on  the  east  side  of  Prince  Street.  (Courtesy  of  the  Museum  of  American  Textile 
History.) 


The  Boott  Boardinghouse  Plan  11 


Figure  2^4.  John  Coolidge  photograph  of  Harvard  Yard.  Mill  housing  was  at  times 
compared  favorably  to  academic  dormitories.  (Courtesy  of  the  Museum  of  American 
Textile  History.) 


12   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


0i)~,7, 


O    "-1   T) 

£8cw 
t,  /-^  n 

<t>    t-1  M 
s  o    i 

H   S5    -. 

"   3   S 

£§,§ 
n  n  » 

O    £D    3 
—   3     CL 

(t     »    ^ 

§  £  a 

<-'  nf  <3 

5'  cf. 

3     O 

3 

no 
»  o1 

TO     « 
f     ^ 

o   _ 

I  s 

z?.  o 

«'  S 

£.  X- 

o   o 

D      "ii 

S'  co 

3     & 

2.  1 

TO     C 
■-1     c/i 


1 


The  Boott  Boardinghouse  Plan   13 


of  the  four  Lawrence  Corporation  blocks  of  ca. 
1833,  whose  tenements  are  four  bays  deep 
instead  of  three  (Figure  2-7). 

A  comparison  of  the  plans  of  the  Suffolk  and 
Boott  blocks  reveals  that  the  only  significant 
difference  is  in  the  location  of  the  first-floor 
doorways  within  the  boardinghouses.  The 
Suffolk  plan  has  both  the  front  parlor  and  back 
room  accessible  only  from  the  kitchen.  The 
advantage  of  this  plan,  presumably,  is  that  no 
first-floor  traffic  escapes  the  gaze  of  whoever  is 
in  the  kitchen.  Apparently  the  inconvenience  of 
this  circulation  pattern  outweighed  the 
advantage,  however,  for  the  later  Boott  plan  links 
each  adjacent  space,  in  the  manner  of  a  typical 
house  plan. 

An  interesting  feature  of  the  Boott/Suffolk 
plan  is  the  asymmetry  of  the  end  units.  The  unit 
abutting  the  yard  on  each  end  is  clearly  favored. 
The  front  hall  of  the  yard  unit  opens  to  both  the 
front  parlor  and  the  kitchen  behind.  In  the 
street-facing  unit,  the  visitor  must  enter  and 
cross  the  kitchen  to  get  to  the  small,  ill-lit  parlor. 
While  the  yard  units  have  fireplaces  in  both 
rooms  on  every  story,  the  street-facing  units  lack 
fireplaces  in  the  parlor  and  parlor  chambers,  the 
only  rooms  in  the  entire  block  deprived  of  a  heat 
source.  These  street-facing  units  are  also  cut  off 
from  the  back  yards  and  sheds  and  lack  the 
closets  of  their  neighbors.  While  certain  of 
these  disparities,  such  as  yard  access,  could  not 
easily  have  been  avoided,  the  lack  of  a  second 
chimney  in  the  street-facing  units  is  not  so 
quickly  explained.  It  appears  that  initially,  at 
least,  the  less  comfortable  units  were  rented  to 
single  males  rather  than  to  families  (cf. 
demographic  data  presented  in  Bond  1987: 
Appendix  B). 

The  Suffolk  plan  makes  it  clear  that  ells  were 
not  intended  to  be  built  behind  any  of  these 
units.  A  small  ground  plan  in  the  corner  shows  a 
continuous  12-ft-wide  shed  separated  from  the 
main  block  by  29  1/2-ft-long  yards,  the  breadth 
of  each  boardinghouse.  The  body  of 
cartographic,  plan,  and  photographic  evidence 
indicates  that  ells  were  not  normally  part  of  the 
original  plans  of  Lowell  boardinghouses.  When 
John  Coolidge  photographed  the  rears  of  the  five 
brick  blocks  in  Somersworth  in  the  early  20th 
century,  continuous  sheds  were  clearly  visible, 
but  the  blocks  still  lacked  ells  (Coolidge 
Photograph  Collection,  Museum  of  American 
Textile  History,  nos.  382-386).  The  earliest 
boardinghouse  plans  that  show  ells  as  an 
integral  feature  are  probably  those  of  the 
Amoskeag  Corporation  blocks  in  Manchester, 
New  Hampshire  (Figures  2-8  and  2-9),  which 
date  from  1839.     The  Bay  State  Corporation 


blocks  of  1845-46  in  Lawrence  were  also  built 
with  ells  (Coolidge  1942:  fig.  47).  In  Lowell, 
however,  it  is  probable  that  most  boardinghouse 
ells  were  not  added  until  after  the  Civil  War. 
The  1876  Lowell  bird's-eye  view  shows  most 
blocks  still  lacking  them,  although  they  are 
clearly  illustrated  on  the  1884  drawing  of  the 
Appleton  blocks  and  the  long  one-story  ells  of 
the  Boott  blocks,  further  supports  the  theory  that 
the  ells  were  later  additions. 

The  Massachusetts  Corporation  Mill  blocks  of 
ca.  1839  were  probably  the  last  corporation 
boardinghouses  in  Lowell  erected  on  the  model 
of  the  Appleton  blocks  and  likely  followed  the 
Suffolk/Boott  plan.  As  one  of  the  Massachusetts 
blocks  still  survives  on  Bridge  Street,  it  would  be 
worthwhile  to  investigate  its  floor  plan.  In 
elevation  it  is  identical  to  the  Boott  blocks, 
except  that  its  dormers  are  spaced  differently. 
Heavy  20th-century  alteration  of  the  first  floor 
exterior  has  obscured  the  original  location  of 
doorways.  The  two  blocks  between  Bridge  and 
George  Streets  and  one  block  along  Merrimack 
Street  were  the  only  Massachusetts  blocks  as 
long  as  those  of  the  Boott.  The  six  remaining 
blocks  illustrated  in  the  1879  City  Atlas,  some  of 
which  may  be  later  than  1839,  each  include  six 
units,  including  doubled  tenements  at  their  ends 
(Richards  1879). 

After  1840,  Lock  and  Canals  shifted  from  the 
building  of  Appleton-type  boardinghouse  blocks 
to  the  construction  of  blocks  of  overseers' 
tenements.  Certain  of  these  overseers'  blocks 
shared  characteristics  of  the  earlier 
boardinghouses  (e.g.,  a  height  of  3  1/2  stories,  3- 
bayed  units,  the  kitchens  and  parlors  of  two  units 
abutting,  etc.),  but  there  were  significant 
differences  as  well.  First,  the  overseers'  blocks 
consisted  entirely  of  tenements,  and  there  was 
thus  no  need  for  end  units.  They  also  had  higher 
floor-to-ceiling  heights  than  the  earlier  blocks, 
reflecting  a  general  architectural  trend  that 
existed  until  the  middle  of  the  19th  century. 
Their  attic  stories  were  invariably  serviced  by 
more  dormers  than  had  occurred  on  the 
boardinghouses;  further,  these  tenements  were 
usually  built  with  integral  brick  ells  of  one  or  two 
stories.  The  "New  Block"  of  the  Merrimack 
Corporation  on  Dutton  Street,  constructed  ca. 
1850-55,  and  the  Boott  overseers'  block  of  ca. 
1850-55  are  good  illustrations  of  this  type  (Figure 
2 — 10;  see  also  Kengott  1912:  fig.  23).  The  former 
was  particularly  unique  for  its  great  length. 
Nonetheless,  surviving  drawings  of  the  Lawrence 
Corporation  overseers'  block  of  March  1845, 
show  it  to  have  had  a  slightly  modified 
Suffolk/Boott  floor  plan,  the  only  differences 
being   the  elimination   of   the   two   first-floor 


14   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


\13 


LLlL 


I 


m 


Jll_J_J 


n 


i 


in 


k    F  '     ■■     MM     i     i  -     1 

LLi.it!  i  i*i  LI  J 

±J±  LJ_ 


A«tf     #/*rJ      »/     i~«,.M,~f:    ke 


1 


~1 


J,    J L   -J 


Figure  2-6.  Floor  plans  of  Boott  boardinghouse,  1836.  (Locks  and  Canals  Collection. 
Courtesy  Lowell  Historical  Society  and  University  of  Lowell  Special  Collections.) 


The  Boott  Boardinghouse  Plan  15 


Figure  2-7.     John  Coolidge  photograph  of  "New  Block"  of  Merrimack  Company 
housing,  built  ca.  1845.  (Courtesy  of  the  Museum  of  American  Textile  History.) 


16   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


2P  ri  21 


"1      w      C 


1 £" 

W  (D  3 
<  CW    o 

e-  o   o> 

•    r^oq 

S  J-  R 
O  3  x 
3     Q    * 

~«2  § 

3  - 
3  § 

"2.  a 
ST  w 

3    - 


^  C 

22  ^ 
m    2 


o  *-" 

"I 

-  f 

o  o 
2.  «, 
^  2 


1 

E 

The  Boott  Boardinghouse  Plan   17 


T 


^j 


Figure  2-9.  Middle  units,  Amoskeag  block  nos.  2,  4,  5,  6, 10, 15, 16, 17,  first  and  upper 
stories  (2).  The  end  units  were  identical  to  those  shown  in  Figure  2-8,  but  the  number  of 
middle  units  per  block  varied.  Not  to  scale.  (Copied  by  Gregory  K.  Clancey  from  plans 
at  the  Manchester  Historical  Society.  Redrawn  by  David  H.  Dutton.) 


18   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  2-10.   John  Coolidge  photograph  of  Overseer's  Block,  Boott  Mills  Corporation. 
(Courtesy  of  the  Museum  of  American  Textile  History.) 


The  Boott  Boardinghouse  Plan  19 


PLANS  OF  THE   BOARDINC     HOUSES      BELONCINC   TO 
THE    BAY   STATE    MILLS  IN    LAWRENCE. 


^=3 


Z*&  '■'-'- — -.yv« — /-..     i  i 


gplE 


a  i 


55   K 

Hi  E 


^s* 


g3^    Ff 


E  HI 

it    1 


TPlf     E3*     fe'"?l     '5)1      fr^i      W     US'    j 


CUD    MOUSE    INTMI    BLOCK 


SCCO^O     HOUSt     in    THE    BLOC* 


SECOND  8   THIRD    TLOORS 


StWC" 
SHED 


to 


SHEO 


«sspool[[  Jccsspool 


•"«■  © 


wjt»        vy  *»« 


CLOSCT      | 


-TT^ 


Figure  2-11.  Elevation  and  plans  of  Bay  State  Mills  boardinghouse,  Lawrence, 
Massachusetts.   (Reproduced  from  Shattuck  1850.) 


20  The  Board inghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


J 


1__ 


I U 


Figure  2-12.   Essex  Company  Machine  Shop  blocks,  Lawrence,  Massachusetts,  ca.  1847; 
first  story  of  2  1  /2  stories.  Fifty  units  were  constructed,  in  rows  of  61-17  units  each.  Not  to 
scale.   (Copied  by  Gregory  K.  Clancey  from  plans  at  the  Manchester  Historical  Society. 
Redrawn  by  David  H.  Dutton.) 


closets,  as  well  as  some  changes  in  the 
dimensions  of  rooms.  This  block  (or  blocks)  was 
not  designed  with  ells  and  was  only  21/2  stories 
tall,  so  the  similarity  of  its  floor  plan  to  that  of 
other  overseers'  blocks  is  open  to  question. 

Brick  boardinghouse  blocks  of  3  1/2  stories 
were  also  constructed  in  most  of  the  other 
Waltham  system  towns.  The  example  of  Great 
Falls  (Somersworth),  New  Hampshire,  has 
already  been  cited.  In  no  instance,  however,  was 
the  Appleton-type  boardinghouse  copied  in  all 
its  details.  Perhaps  the  closest  relatives  of  the 
Appleton-type  blocks  beyond  Lowell  were 
certain  of  the  blocks  erected  by  the  Amoskeag 
Corporation  in  Manchester,  New  Hampshire, 
beginning  in  1839  (Figures  2-5,  2-6).  Amoskeag 
blocks  no.  1-6,  10,  and  15-17,  the  last  of  which 
were  erected  by  1848,  all  have  the  distinctive 
massing  and  elevations  of  the  Appleton  type. 
The  first  four  blocks,  however,  have  only  one 
boardinghouse  unit  sandwiched  between  four 
end  tenements,  and  the  extreme  hilliness  of  the 
Amoskeag  site  dictated  that  the  units  be 
dramatically  stepped.  The  interiors  show  a  great 
deal  of  modification.  Blocks  no.  1  and  3  (both 
1839-40)  reject  the  Suffolk/Boott  plan  for  an 
entirely  new  arrangement.  The  middle  unit  is 
actually  three  separate  apartments,  one  to  each 
floor.  The  end  tenements  also  have  floor  plans 
which  correct  some  of  the  disadvantages 
inherent  in  the  Suffolk/Boott  plan.  The  street- 
facing  unit  now  has  a  corridor  connection  to  the 
back  yard,  and  the  yard  unit,  to  compensate  for 
the  loss  of  space  occasioned  by  this  corridor,  now 
enjoys  a  small  ell.  Both  units  have  generous 
closets.      Although    the   end    tenements    still 


preserve  certain  differences,  their  livability  is 
more  nearly  equal. 

In  the  other  eight  Amoskeag  blocks,  the 
Suffolk/Boott  floor  plan  was  reintroduced  for  the 
boardinghouse  units,  with  only  slight 
modifications  on  the  upper  stories.  In  all  cases, 
however,  the  Suffolk/Boott  plan  for  the  end 
tenements  was  abandoned  in  favor  of  that  of 
blocks  no.  1  and  3.  As  Amoskeag  had  faithfully 
adopted  the  design  of  the  Lowell  mills  and  even 
the  Lowell  City  Hall  for  Manchester,  so  too  did  it 
adopt  the  Lowell  boardinghouse  design,  but  not 
without  correcting  what  it  perceived  to  be 
Lowell's  mistakes. 

The  counterpart  of  Locks  and  Canals  in 
Lawrence,  the  Essex  Company,  was  apparently 
less  enthusiastic  about  copying  or  modifying 
Lowell  models.  Surviving  plans  for  the  Atlantic 
Corporation  boardinghouses  of  1846  (one  of  the 
first  two  sets  of  boardinghouse  blocks  in 
Lawrence,  see  L.  A.  Williamson,  "Plan  of  the 
Boarding  Houses  Built  for  the  Atlantic  Cotton 
Mills  in  1846,  Nos.  7  &  8"),  as  well  as  two  extant 
units  of  an  Atlantic  block  which  survive  with  their 
interiors  intact,  show  that  the  idea  of  doubled 
end  tenements  was  abandoned  in  Lawrence. 
The  end  units  of  the  Atlantic  blocks,  facing  the 
street  like  the  intermediate  units,  copy  the 
Suffolk/Boott  boardinghouse  floor  plan,  except 
that  they  include  kitchen  ells.  These  end  units 
probably  functioned  as  tenements  rather  than 
as  boardinghouses.  The  middle  units  of  the  row, 
however,  present  an  entirely  different  floor  plan, 
four  bays  wide  instead  of  three,  and  are  far  more 
spacious  than  those  of  the  end  units.  The  blocks 
of  Lawrence's  other  original  corporation,  the  Bay 


The  Boott  Boardinghouse  Plan  21 


State  (1846-47),  appear  to  follow  an  identical 
scheme,  according  to  a  contemporary  plan  of 
one  such  block  (Figure  2-11).  These  Lawrence 
blocks  also  abandoned  the  "dutch"  or  joined 
chimneys  so  characteristic  of  Lowell. 

The  2  1/2-story  brick  tenement  rows  that  the 
Essex  Company  erected  for  the  Lawrence 
Machine  Shop  in  ca.  1847,  perhaps  taking  their 
cue  from  the  21/2  story  blocks  Locks  and  Canals 
had  just  erected  for  the  Lawrence  Corporation 
overseers  in  Lowell,  preserve  the  Suffolk/Boott 
floor  plan  (Figure  2-12).  The  same  floor  plan  was 
again  used  for  fourteen  units  of  "First  Class 
Machine  Shop  Blocks"  for  the  Lawrence 
Machine  Shop,  which  were  erected  sometime  in 
the  1850s  and  sold  at  auction  in  1859  when  the 
machine  shop  failed.  In  this  late  manifestation 
of  the  plan,  the  kitchen  has  been  pushed  entirely 
into  an  ell,  and  what  was  the  kitchen  has  become 
the  dining  room,  a  change  that  occurs  with 
almost  no  alteration  to  the  plan's  features  (Plans 
No.  45-46:  "First  Class  Machine  Shop  Blocks"  in 
Folder  W12,  No.  1,  Everett  Mills,  Essex  Company 
Collection,  Museum  of  American  Textile 
History). 


Summary 

Although  plans  for  contemporary  blocks  in  the 
other  Waltham-system  towns  have  yet  to  be 
discovered,  it  appears  from  ancillary  evidence 
that  the  standard  boardinghouse  configuration 
of  Lowell,  represented  by  the  Boott  elevations 
and  floor  plan,  was  carried  only  as  far  as 
Amoskeag  in  Manchester,  and  even  there  met 
with  significant  modification.  The  planning  of 
corporation  housing  underwent  constant 
development  after  1840  both  in  and  outside  of 
Lowell,  as  represented  by  the  Locks  and  Canals 
overseers'  blocks,  the  Essex  Company 
boardinghouses,  and  even  later  boardinghouses 
designed  by  the  Essex  Company  for  Lewiston, 
Maine  (Plan  No.  41,  Essex  Company  Collection, 
Museum  of  American  Textile  History).  The 
Boott  boardinghouse  floor  plan  continued  to 
provide  some  service  to  corporation  planners  at 
least  into  the  1850s. 


22   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Chapter  3 

"THAT  WE  MAY  PURIFY  OUR  CORPORATION 

BY  DISCHARGING  THE  OFFENDERS":  THE  DOCUMENTARY  RECORD 

OF  SOCIAL  CONTROL  AT  THE  BOOTT  MILLS 

by  Kathleen  H.  Bond 


Introduction 

From  the  very  beginning  of  industrial  Lowell  in 
the  1820s  and  continuing  into  the  20th  century, 
the  Lowell  mill  owners  took  myriad  steps  to 
regulate  workers'  lives.  In  turn,  workers 
struggled  to  maintain  control  of  their  own  lives. 
Conflicts  between  the  interests  of  workers  and 
those  of  management  revolved  around  social, 
political,  and,  most  pointedly,  economic  issues. 
The  underlying  tensions  existed  not  only  at  the 
Boott  Mills  and  the  other  mills  in  Lowell,  but 
throughout  the  factory  system  as  a  whole 
(Gutman  1975;  Harvey  1976;  Gross  and  Wright 
1985;  Johnson  1978). 

A  series  of  letters  written  by  Boott 
management  to  boardinghouse  residents  and 
other  documentary  data  provide  evidence  of 
Boott  management's  attempts  at  social  control 
and  help  to  outline  the  response  by  workers  to 
that  attempt  at  control.  Used  alone,  neither 
documentary  nor  archeological  evidence  is 
adequate  to  illumine  fully  the  relationship 
between  workers  and  management.  But  woven 
together,  the  strands,  of  which  social  control  is 
one  thread,  help  to  create  a  dense  and  complex 
weave  that  present  a  clearer  picture  of  life  in  the 
boardinghouse  as  experienced  by  the  workers. 

The  primary  focus  of  this  research  is  the  mill's 
attempt  at  social  control  during  the  post-Civil 
War  era,  when  a  large  number  of  immigrant 
workers  labored  in  the  mills.  A  concentration  on 
the  post-bellum  years  is  in  no  way  intended  to 
slight  the  importance  of  the  earlier  "mill  girl"  era 
at  the  Lowell  mills;  the  decision  to  focus  on  the 
"immigrant"  era  of  the  Boott's  history,  however, 
was  made  for  three  reasons.  One,  a  portion  of 
the  documentary  evidence  that  dates  to  the  end 
of  the  19th  century — the  letters  in  the  Boott  Mills 
correspondence  book  (see  below) — is  texturally 
very  rich;  the  letters  deserve  to  be  examined  in 
detail.  Two,  much  of  the  artifactual  material 
from  the  Boott  boardinghouse  backlots  dates 
after  1880.  Three,  some  of  the  Boott  Mills  letters 
in  the  correspondence  book  were  written  to 
keepers  and  /or  residents  who  lived  in  the  units 
that  were  investigated  archeologically.  Such  a 
direct  connection  between  the  archeology  and 
the    documentary     data     permits     a     close 


comparison  between  the  beliefs  inherent  in  the 
documents  with  the  behavior  suggested  by  the 
artifacts. 

The  Boott  Mills'  correspondence  book  is  a 
series  of  letters  written  by  James  G.  Marshall, 
paymaster  for  the  Boott  Mills  between  1872  and 
1906  (see  Appendix  A).  The  letters  were  written 
on  order  of  his  superior,  mill  agent  Alexander  J. 
Cumnock.  Marshall  not  only  signed  his  own 
name  but  also  included  the  phrase  "per  order 
agent"  at  the  bottom  of  the  majority  of  letters. 
The  correspondence  book  in  which  the  letters 
are  contained  (in  the  University  of  Lowell  Special 
Collections)  spans  a  relatively  brief  period  (1888- 
1891),  so  it  is  highly  probable  that  the  book  is  one 
in  a  series  compiled  over  the  years.  Most  of  the 
letters  in  the  more  than  900  pages  concern  the 
sale  and  transport  of  cotton,  but  60  of  them  were 
written  to  Boott  boardinghouse  keepers, 
overseers,  and  mill  workers. 

Although  there  are  other  general  19th-century 
descriptions  of  boardinghouse  life  in  Lowell,  the 
Boott  letters  are  unique  documents.  They 
provide  a  rare  documentary  glimpse  into  the 
daily  lives  of  the  Boott  workers  of  1890  (at  least  as 
perceived  by  agent  Cumnock).  While 
archeological  investigations  provide  tangible 
evidence  of  day-to-day  behavior — more  often 
than  not  in  the  form  of  detritus  or  the  seemingly 
mundane — the  documentary  record  rarely 
yields  similar  data,  particularly  for  working-class 
individuals.  The  letters  describe  repairs  to  the 
units,  as  well  as  water  and  sanitation  systems  in 
use  in  the  housing,  details  that  are  invaluable 
aids  to  the  archeological  interpretation. 
Cumnock  accused  workers  of  damaging  mill 
property  or  of  alcohol  use  in  the  boardinghouses. 
These  behaviors,  too,  have  material  correlates  in 
the  archeological  record. 

Equally  as  important,  through  the  letters  one 
can  begin  to  examine  the  conflict  that  existed 
between  the  interests  of  mill  owners  and  those  of 
mill  workers.  First,  the  letters  help  to  illumine 
the  methods  used  by  the  mill  workers  to  increase 
the  degree  of  decision  making  in  their  lives. 
Second,  they  bring  into  focus  the  ways  in  which 
management  responded  to  and  in  fact  played  a 
role  in  shaping  mill  workers'  behavior. 


23 


24   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  A  Way  of  Life 


For  the  purposes  of  study,  the  correspondence 
is  divided  into  four  categories:  dismissals  and 
complaints;  conversion  of  boardinghouses  and 
availability  of  housing;  repairs  to  units  and  cost 
of  utilities;  and  a  "catch-all"  section  with  letters 
that  concern  debts,  wages,  illness,  and  death  of 
employees  (see  Appendix  A).  These  categories 
are  not  mutually  exclusive,  as  a  number  of  the 
letters  address  more  than  one  issue. 

The  letters,  particularly  the  "complaints,"  and 
other  documents — e.g.,  19th-century  accounts  of 
life  in  the  mills,  newspaper  articles,  Lowell  City 
Directory  data — are  used  below  to  explore  two 
types  of  social  control  implemented  by  mill 
management.  First,  management's  attempts  at 
direct  control  of  the  workforce  is  discussed.  The 
system  of  paternalism  during  the  "mill  girl"  era 
is  outlined  briefly,  and  the  form  of  direct  control 
used  during  the  latter  part  of  the  century  is 
examined  in  more  detail.  Second,  Boott 
management's  use  of  indirect  methods  to 
control  workers'  lives  is  examined.  These 
methods  include  the  mills'  involvement  in  the 
temperance  movement  in  Lowell  and  its 
influence  on  city  policy  regarding  the  sale  and 
consumption  of  alcohol. 


Direct  Control  of  the  Workforce 

Company    Policy    and    New    England-Born 
Workers 

From  the  1820s  onward,  mill  regulations 
played  a  pivotal  role  in  the  plan  of  the  Boston 
Associates  (the  wealthy  shareholders  of  all  the 
Lowell  mills)  for  the  development  of  the  textile 
industry  in  Lowell.  The  "lords  of  the  loom" 
(Cowley  1868:  90)  initiated  a  formal,  paternalistic 
system  of  control.  Although  paternalism  "can 
become  a  spongy  term,  calling  forth  only 
imagery  of  a  fuzzy,  vaguely  friendly  form  of 
domination"  (Scranton  1984:  234),  both  its 
purpose  and  quality  were  quite  different. 
Paternalism  was  at  once  an  efficient  means  of 
facilitating  both  for  worker  and  employer  a 
cultural  transition  from  pre-industrial,  artisanal 
production  to  the  world  of  the  mill  and  a  method 
to  manipulate  workers'  behavior  in  the  interest 
of  profit. 

Out  of  necessity,  the  Boston  Associates 
provided  for  the  physical  needs  of  their 
employees  and  proffered  at  least  the  trappings 
for  meeting  their  spiritual  and  emotional  needs. 
The  mill  owners  provided  company-run 
boardinghouses,  a  church,  and  educational 
opportunities.  In  doing  so,  the  industrialists 
tapped  into  what  was  for  their  purposes  an  ideal 
workforce:    young,  New  England-born  women. 


The  "mill  girls"  were  an  unskilled,  short-term 
labor  pool  that  could  easily  be  replenished. 

To  counteract  the  public's  fear  that  Lowell 
would  become  a  gloomy  slum,  inhabited  by 
degraded  individuals — the  contemporary  image 
of  English  industrial  centers — the  industrialists 
assured  the  public  that  both  the  workers' 
physical  and  moral  well-being  would  be  carefully 
tended.  The  Boston  Associates  frequently  took 
the  opportunity  to  publicize  (e.g.,  Massachusetts 
House  of  Representatives  Docket  #50  1845; 
Miles  1846)  that  the  workers'  behavior  would  be 
diligently  supervised  by  mill  room  overseers — 
men  whose  conduct  the  mill  owners  guaranteed 
was  above  reproach — and  by  strict  yet  motherly 
boardinghouse  keepers. 

The  system  closely  regulated  workers'  waking 
hours,  both  at  work  and  during  their  time  away 
from  the  looms.  Included  in  the  list  of 
regulations  were  rules  that  required  workers  to 
attend  Sunday  worship  and  to  refrain  from 
alcohol  use,  and  "immoral  and  indolent 
persons"  who  disobeyed  were  subject  to 
immediate  dismissal  (Austin  n.d.;  Lawrence 
1846).  Moreover,  unless  special  permission  was 
given,  all  workers  were  to  live  only  in  the 
boardinghouses  of  the  company  by  which  they 
were  employed,  and  the  units  locked  at  ten 
o'clock  each  night. 

The  long,  parallel,  rows  of  corporate  housing  in 
themselves  were  designed  to  assuage  the 
public's  initial  distrust.  As  Coolidge  points  out 
(1942:  34,  48),  the  buildings'  faqades  followed  the 
dictates  of  rural  tradition  and  academic 
propriety.  The  design  of  Lowell's  mill  housing  of 
the  1820s  resembled  contemporary  rural 
architecture,  and  the  boardinghouses  of  the 
1830s  bore  a  striking  resemblance  to  18th- 
century  buildings,  such  as  Harvard  University's 
Massachusetts  Hall  (cf.  Figure  2-4).  Further,  the 
mill  yards  were  landscaped  in  an  attempt  to 
soften  the  harshness  of  the  industrial 
environment  (Beaudry  1989:  19-20;  Beaudry  and 
Mrozowski  1988: 18). 

The  image  of  a  faqade  seems  an  appropriate 
metaphor  when  applied  to  the  system  of 
paternalism  as  initiated  by  the  Boston 
Associates.  The  faqades  were  key  to  conveying 
an  image  of  order  and  propriety,  but  it  is 
questionable  whether  the  same  degree  of 
concern  extended  to  areas  out  of  the  public  eye. 
In  workers'  letters  to  home,  descriptions  of 
boardinghouse  life  (Dublin  1981)  were  general  in 
nature.  The  reticence  suggests  that,  while 
"nothing  to  write  home  about,"  the  housing  was 
either  adequate,  or,  these  particular  women  had 
resigned  themselves  to  the  conditions.  At  least 
two  accounts  asserted  life  in  the  housing  was  less 


The  Documentary  Record  of  Social  Control    25 


than  ideal — although  these  were  written  at  a 
time  of  labor  unrest  in  the  mills,  and  the  authors 
were  not  disinterested  observers.  Strikes 
occurred  over  wages  and  conditions  in  the  mills, 
however,  so  there  is  probably  truth  to  their 
assertions.  In  1845,  one  factory  worker  wrote 
(Female  Labor  Reform  Association  1845:  6)  that 
they  were  required  to  sleep  in  "small 
comfortless,  half  ventilated"  rooms  and  the  price 
of  board  would  not  "ensure  to  her  the  common 
comforts  of  life."  Another  critic  of  conditions  in 
the  mills  maintained  that  not  only  were  the 
houses  overcrowded,  but  they  had  inadequate 
sanitation  and  were  overrun  with  vermin 
(Huntington  1843,  cited  in  Coburn  1920:  259). 

While  it  is  simplistic  to  suggest  that  the  mill 
owners  were  motivated  only  by  a  desire  for 
profits — a  complex  set  of  of  economic,  social, 
and  political  factors  figured  in  the  plan  of  the 
Lowell  mill  owners  (Dalzell  1987) — neither  was 
the  faqade  buttressed  by  an  unselfish  sense  of 
responsibility  to  meet  workers'  needs,  let  alone 
desires.  The  owners  wished  to  serve  their  own 
interests,  and  they  desired  to  control  workers' 
lives  without  taking  concomitant  responsibility 
for  these  same  lives.  To  do  so,  management 
wove  around  the  workers  "a  complex  social 
matrix  so  thorough  that  it  left  no  significant 
decision,  day  or  night,  to  the  workers"  (Gross  and 
Wright  1985: 14). 


Company  Policy  and  Immigrant  Workers 

Beginning  after  1840,  the  New  England-born 
mill  women,  protesting  wage  cuts  and  hours  of 
labor,  began  to  leave  the  Lowell  mills,  to  be 
replaced  by  Irish  immigrant  workers;  French 
Canadians  arrived  after  the  Civil  War,  and 
Eastern  European  workers  after  1900.  Not 
surprisingly,  management's  control  of  the 
workforce  continued,  still  hidden  behind  the 
faqade.  "Strong  and  independent  labor 
continued  to  be  seen  as  the  enemy  and  a  low- 
skilled,  transient,  divided  workforce  the  defense" 
(Gross  and  Wright  1985:  21). 

The  quality  of  the  control  changed,  however. 
The  desire  to  convey  to  the  public  that  an 
orderly,  morally  correct  environment  prevailed, 
but,  with  the  arrival  of  the  immigrants  and 
increased  economic  pressures  of  textile 
production,  the  formal  structure  of  the  mill 
owners'  paternalism  faded.  Any  attempt  at 
"moral  sheltering  was  dropped  for  the  benefit  of 
increased  output"  (Scranton  1984:  245). 

The  Massachusetts  Bureau  of  Statistics  of 
Labor  (MBSL)  included  in  its  1882  report  the 
regulations  for  the  corporations'  tenements  and 
boardinghouses  in  Lowell  (see  Clancey,  this 


volume,  for  a  discussion  of  the  distinction 
between  tenements  and  boardinghouses).  The 
MBSL  list  is  somewhat  suspect  because  it  is 
generic;  it  may  be  a  compilation  of  many 
different  sources.  But  the  1876  Massachusetts 
Mill  Regulations  (cited  in  Kenngott  1912:  24)  and 
the  1886  Boston  Globe  interview  cite  similar 
boardinghouse  regulations. 

The  regulations  for  lease  of  the  tenements 
were  as  follows. 

Rent  at  a  fixed  sum  to  be  paid  monthly,  and,  in 
addition,  the  taxes  assessed  on  the  tenement  to  be 
paid  monthly  sums  to  the  lessor. 

Tenant  to  keep  the  tenement  in  good  order  and 
repair  except  ordinary  wear  and  tear. 

Tenement  not  to  be  sub-let  without  lessors'  consent. 

Tenements  to  be  carefully  used,  subject  to  rules  made 
by  the  agent  for  their  orderly  management,  among 
which  are:  no  rubbish  to  be  put  in  privy  vaults;  no 
hens  or  swine  to  be  kept;  snow  and  ice  to  be  at  once 
removed  from  sidewalks;  no  locks  to  be  put  on  or 
changes  made  in  tenements  without  permission;  no 
boarders  to  be  kept  except  in  specially  designated 
boarding  houses. 

Agents  of  lessor  may  enter  the  premises  to  make 
repairs  or  to  see  that  conditions  of  lease  are 
observed,  and  lessors  retain  full  control  over  all 
streets  and  ways  on  their  land  leading  to  tenements. 

Either  party  must  give  the  other  at  least  ten  days 
notice  of  intention  to  terminate  lease,  except  that 
lessee  may  at  once  be  expelled  if  he  shall  make  any 
strip  or  waste.  After  ten  days  notice,  may  be 
expelled,  and,  if  allowed  to  remain  while  lessor 
seeks  to  recover  possession  by  legal  process,  shall 
remain  as  a  tenant  by  sufferance,  expressly  waiving 
any  such  right  after  the  expiration  of  said  ten  days. 

The    MBSL    asserted    that    the   next    seven 
regulations  pertained  to  the  boardinghouses. 

The  following  are  not  permitted  without  special 
permission:  underletting  tenements;  boarding 
parties  not  in  the  employ  of  the  company;  boarding 
males  and  females  in  the  same  house. 

Tenants  are  not  to  permit  their  boarders  to  have 
company  at  unseasonable  hours.  Doors  must  be 
closed  at  ten  o'clock  each  evening,  and  no  person 
admitted  after  that  time  without  some  reasonable 


Buildings  and  yards  must  be  kept  clean  and  in  good 
order,  and,  if  ignored,  otherwise  than  from 
ordinary  use,  will  be  repaired  at  the  expense  of  the 
occupant.  Sidewalks  must  be  kept  free  from  snow 
and  ice. 

The  several  companies  have  at  great  expense 
provided  a  hospital  for  the  benefit  of  those 
connected  with  the  mills....  Boarding  house  keepers 


26   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  A  Way  of  Life 


are  therefore  required  to  report  at  the  Company's 
office  all  cases  of  sickness  among  the  boarders... 

The  prices  to  be  paid  for  board  at  the  present  are  as 
follows:  Females  per  week,  $1.85;  Males,  $2.90.  By 
board  is  meant,  providing  meals,  doing  the  usual 
washing,  and  furnishing  lodging,  and  care  of  rooms. 
Boarders  are  not  required  to  perform  chamber-work. 

The  furnishing  of  meals  to  persons  employed  by  the 
company  is  in  some  cases  allowed;  but  this  practice 
must  in  no  case  be  permitted  to  interfere  with. ..good 
treatment  of  the  operatives. 

When  required,  boarding  house  keepers  must  give 
an  account  of  number,  names,  and  employment  of 
their  boarders,  of  their  general  conduct,  and 
whether  they  habitually  attend  church  or  not. 

As  written,  many  of  the  housing  rules  of  the 
1880s  were  quite  similar  (while,  perhaps,  more 
detailed)  than  those  of  the  1840s.  In  a  step  that 
reflected  the  abandonment  of  moral  sheltering, 
however,  three  prominent  rules  were  dropped 
from  the  written  regulations  or  not  enforced. 

Despite  the  assertion  in  the  MBSL  that 
management  wished  to  know  whether  workers 
"habitually"  attended  church,  Dublin  (1979:  277) 
notes  that  it  "seems  to  have  been  enforced  only 
in  the  breach."  In  an  1886  Boston  Globe 
interview,  a  mill  agent  asserted  that  he 
considered  it  "an  important  duty  to  attend 
religious  worship,  and  we  let  it  [the  regulation] 
have  what  weight  it  may  as  friendly  advice."  No 
doubt  this  attitude  reflected  in  part  the  distrust 
and  fear  of  Catholicism  that  had  greeted 
immigrant  workers  and  their  "unAmerican," 
non-Protestant  cultures. 

The  solid  rows  of  brick  boardinghouse  must 
have  remained  as  highly  visible  reminders  of  the 
"beneficent"  policies  of  the  mills,  but,  after  the 
immigrants  began  to  stream  into  Lowell,  the 
regulation  that  all  employees  live  in  company 
housing  was  rescinded.  Funds  were  diverted 
from  housing  costs  and  poured  into  mill 
expansion;  as  the  century  progressed,  the  value 
of  the  mill  housing  in  Lowell  continually 
declined  (Dublin  1979:  76).l  In  addition,  while 
many  foreign-born  workers  preferred  to  live  in 
the  ethnic  enclaves  in  Lowell,  at  least  initially, 
immigrants  were  discriminated  against  and 
denied  access  to  the  mills'  boardinghouses 
(Dublin  1979: 155). 

Notable  in  its  absence  from  the  regulations 
was  the  proscription  against  alcohol  use;  the 


The  Boott  expended  over  $121,000  for  construction  of  8 
rows  of  housing  between  1835  and  1838.  By  1898,  9  rows  of 
Boott  housing  were  valued  at  just  over  $87,000 
(Proprietors  of  Locks  and  Canals,  cited  in  Center  for 
History  Now  1983:  128-129). 


implications   of  the   omission   are   discussed 
further  below. 

Following  the  Civil  War,  mill  agents'  power 
increased  (the  agent  was  responsible  for  the  day- 
to-day  operation  of  the  mill).  In  1864,  William 
Southworth,  agent  of  the  Lawrence 
Manufacturing  Company,  stated  that  his  job 
required 

a  knowledge  of  my  subordinates  &  their  doings — 
full  acquaintance  with  the  condition  of  things  in 
and  about  the  mill  &  yard — the  holding  of  all 
employed  to  the  faithful  performance  of  their 
duties  &  Constance  care  of  the  company's  property 
(quoted  in  Lubar  1983:  84). 

Some  years  later,  Southworth  also  maintained 
that  those  workers  who  lived  in  company 
housing  felt  "they  were  under  a  certain 
espionage  which  was  irksome"  (n.d.,  quoted  in 
Center  For  History  Now  1983:  26).  The  Boott 
letters  attest  to  the  mill  agent's  knowledge  of  his 
subordinates'  "doings." 

In  the  following  discussion,  quotations  from 
the  Boott  letters  are  used  for  illustration.  Full 
transcriptions  appear  in  Appendix  A;  unless 
otherwise  noted,  emphasis,  indicated  here  by 
italics,  appears  in  the  original  document.  Each 
letter  was  assigned  a  number  as  it  was 
transcribed  (letters  appear  in  the  letterbooks  in 
chronological  order — they  are  dated  but  not 
numbered);  these  arbitrary  numbers  are  cited 
herein  to  provide  the  reader  with  a  handy  cross- 
reference  to  the  transcriptions  in  Appendix  A. 


Dismissals  and   Complaints 

Mr.  Marshall,  per  agent  Cumnock's  orders, 
wrote  33  letters  to  keepers,  overseers,  and  mill 
workers  in  which  he  complained  of  an 
individual's  behavior  or  actually  fired  workers  for 
having  disobeyed  a  rule  or  for  having  acted  in  an 
unacceptable  manner:  9  letters  concerned 
boarding  by  keepers  of  non-Boott  employees;  16 
letters  reprimanded  individuals  for  alcohol  use; 
5  for  other  forms  of  "immoral"  behavior;  and  3 
for  damage  to  company  housing. 


Boarding  of  Non-Boott   Employees 

Although  there  is  evidence  that  some  keepers 
were  financially  successful  in  the  business  of 
running  a  boardinghouse  (see  Chapter  5  and 
Bond  1988),  others  failed.  In  1889,  Marshall 
inquired  of  the  Lowell  law  firm  of  Marshall  & 
Hamblet  (letter  2)2 


^  Despite  the  same  surname,  no  familial  link  could  be 
found  between  the  attorney  and  the  paymaster. 


The  Documentary  Record  of  Social  Control   27 


If  personal  property  (household  goods)  are 
attached  for  one  of  our  boarding  houses,  can  the 
party  proceed  and  sell  the  goods  by  auction  from 
the  said  house,  against  our  wish  or  consent — In 
other  words,  can  he  make  an  auction  room  of  our 
boarding  house  without  our  consent. 

The  facts  in  the  case  are  these.  One  of  our  boarding 
house  keepers  has  had  her  household  goods 
attached  for  debt  by  a  grocer.  Now  can  the  grocer 
use  our  building  for  the  purpose  of  disposing  of  the 
goods  by  auction? 

As  many  workers  moved  away  from  the  mills 
into  private  tenements,  the  mills  expended  less 
money  on  housing,  and,  as  the  archeological  and 
documentary  evidence  attest,  housing 
conditions  deteriorated,  keepers  took  measures 
to  turn  a  profit,  or  even  to  stay  solvent.  One 
practice  was  to  take  in  "mealers" — workers  who 
ate  in  the  boardinghouse  but  lodged  elsewhere. 
Also,  on  occasion,  a  keeper  was  permitted  to  run 
two  units  at  one  time  (Boston  Globe  1886:  n.p.; 
South  worth,  cited  in  Kenngott  1912:  46).  This  was 
the  case  with  two  of  the  units  explored 
archeologically;  at  least  for  a  few  years  in  the  late 
1880s  and  1890s,  Boott  #44  and  #45  were  run  by 
one  keeper,  Enoch  Hutchins. 

Sometimes  keepers'  actions  were  contrary  to 
corporation  policy.  Boarding  non-company 
employees  was  one  "illegal"  action.  Not  only 
would  this  have  increased  the  number  of 
boarders  in  a  house  but,  perhaps,  allowed  them 
to  charge  non-mill  employees  a  higher  rate  for 
room  and  board  than  was  set  by  the  mills. 

Keepers  Lizzie  Kittredge  and  O.  D.  Starkey 
were  two  of  the  keepers  who  received 
reprimands  (letters  6  and  7)).  Marshall  wrote  to 
Kittredge,  "It  is  reported  that  Sarah  Stuart  is 
boarding  and  rooming  at  your  house  and  is 
employed  by  Prescott  corporation.  And  that 
Sarah  has  been  with  you  for  the  past  six 
months."  He  stated  emphatically,  "Mr. 
Cumnock  directs  me  to  say  that  any  further 
violation  of  these  rules  will  cause  you  to  forfeit 
your  tenement  as  our  tenements  are  for  our  own 
employees...."  To  Starkey,  Marshall  pointed  out 
that  he  had  "called  your  attention  to  matter  of 
underletting  rooms  without  authority  before." 

The  phrase  "it  is  reported,"  which  the 
paymaster  included  not  only  in  Kittredge's  letter 
but  in  many  others  as  well,  suggests  that 
employees  of  the  Boott  were  in  fact  "under  a 
certain  espionage"  (Southworth  n.d.,  quoted  in 
Center  for  History  Now  1983:  126),  and  that 
management  did  indeed  rely  on  a  network  of 
individuals  to  provide  information  about 
employees'  behavior.  Stuart  may  have  boarded 
illegally  for  six  months,  however,  and  keeper 
Starkey  had  been  warned  before.    Management 


either  could  not  catch  all  the  offenders  or  was 
inconsistent  in  enforcement  of  the  rule. 

Whichever  was  the  case,  management 
consistently  dealt  less  harshly  with 
boardinghouse  keepers  than  mill  workers.  As 
the  century  progressed,  the  boardinghouses 
became  harder  to  fill  and  more  expensive  to  run; 
the  Boott's  leniency  may  reflect  the  lack  of 
potential  replacements  for  the  jobs.  In  addition, 
it  may  reflect  a  prejudice  against  foreign-born 
individuals.  Four  keepers — Hutchins,  Kittredge, 
Williams,  and  Scott — received  multiple  letters 
that  reprimanded  them  for  rule  violations.  Yet 
none  were  dismissed.  Mr  Chambagne,  a  French 
Canadian,  received  only  one  letter  in  which  he 
was  accused  of  "keeping  a  noisy  and  disorderly 
house"  (letter  25),  and  in  the  letter  he  was  fired. 


"Immoral"   Behavior  and  Property  Damage 

Marshall  wrote  24  letters  in  which  he 
complained  of  "inappropriate"  behavior  by 
Boott  employees.  The  paymaster  ordered  Frank 
Leonard  and  Edward  Hazard  dismissed  from 
company  boardinghouses  (letters  14  and  33) 
Hazard  had  "used  language  in  the  street  in  front 
of  your  [Mrs.  Kittredge'sJ  premises  unbecoming 
a  gentlemen."  Leonard,  who  had  recently  left 
the  Boott,  had  been  seen  loafing  on  street 
corners.  In  addition,  Marshall  reprimanded 
keeper  A.  M.  Williams  because  his  boarders 
had  "been  throwing  filth  and  debris  on  top  of  the 
sheds"  (letter  13).  And  in  September  of  1889,  the 
paymaster  wrote  to  Alfred  Gardner  (letter  9) 

Complaint  is  made  that  your  family  throws  swill, 
tea  grounds  etc.  into  the  cesspool  in  your  back  yard 
and  the  same  has  clogged  the  drain  and  will  have 
to  be  cleaned  out  which  Mr.  Crawford  will  attend 
to,  but  you  must  stop  throwing  such  stuff  into  the 
drain  and  not  have  it  [illegible]  again,  and  use  our 
swill  bucket  for  such  things. 

Also  you  had  a  dead  cat  in  your  ash  barrel  last 
Friday  which  had  lain  so  long  that  it  was 
maggatey.  You  must  be  more  cleanly,  and  not  have 
so  much  litter  about  your  premises,  as  it  will  breed 
disease  and  can't  be  allowed. 

There  are  no  photographs  of  the  debris  and 
disarray  to  which  Agent  Cumnock  objected,  but 
the  scene  of  the  rear  of  a  Homestead, 
Pennsylvania,  millworker's  home,  with  its  pile  of 
liquor  bottles,  washing  hung  out  to  dry,  and 
overturned  chair  by  the  stoop  (Figure  3-1),  is 
evocative  of  what  Cumnock  described. 
Moreover,  the  image  of  waste  being  tossed  into 
the  backyards  is  borne  out  in  the  archeological 
evidence.  The  boardinghouse  yard  was  littered 
with  sheet  refuse. 


28  The  Boardinghouse  System  as  A  Way  of  Life 


Figure  3-1.  A  man  washing  up  outside  the  rear  door  of  a  Homestead,  Pennsylvania, 
boardinghouse.  Note  bottles  and  other  refuse  accumulated  on  the  ground  against  the 
building.  (Lewis  Hine  photograph  reproduced  from  Byington  1910.) 


The  Documentary  Record  of  Social  Control    29 


The  litter  outside  the  Homestead  house 
appears  to  be  mostly  liquor  bottles.  Of  the  24 
Boott  letters,  16  complained  of  employees' 
alcohol  use.  If  the  number  of  letters  is  any 
indication,  workers'  inebriation  was  considered 
the  most  serious  offense.  That  drunkenness  was 
dealt  with  harshly — every  mill  worker  so  accused 
was  dismissed — is  not  surprising. 

Drunken  employees  would  have  slowed 
production  and  therefore  profits;  but  the  mills' 
policy  toward  alcohol  was  also  in  keeping  with 
the  middle-class  morality  of  the  day.  The 
emergence  of  the  factory  system  played  a  major 
role  in  the  transformation  of  alcohol  from  a 
beverage  that  most  colonists  had  considered  "in 
itself  a  good  creature  of  God"  (Mather,  quoted  in 
Tyrrell  1979:  16)  to  the  great  scapegoat  of  the 
19th  century.  Demon  rum  was  blamed  for 
crime,  insanity,  poverty,  and  economic 
uncertainty — in  essence,  it  was  made 
responsible  for  most  of  society's  ills  (Johnson 
1978:  55;  Levine  1979:  34).  The  logic  was  that  self- 
control,  an  all-important  concept  to  the 
industrial  work  ethic,  rested  inside  each  person. 
Thus  when  individuals  acted  in  an  unacceptable 
manner,  there  must  have  been  something  that 
affected  the  inner  control  and  causedbad 
behavior.  It  was  easy  and  logical  to  point  the 
finger  at  liquor.  It  became  perceived  as  a  liquid 
that  was  inherently  addictive,  loosened  moral 
constraint,  freed  the  destructive  impulses,  and 
weakened,  if  not  destroyed,  self-control  (Levine 
1979: 34, 37). 

Once  immigrant  workers  arrived  with  their 
own  pre-industrial  customs  associated  with 
alcohol  use,  attitudes  toward  liquor  fueled  the 
prejudice  these  newcomers  experienced  (Stivers 
1976;  Tyrrell  1979).  Immigrants'  poverty  was 
blamed  on  their  drinking.  Moreover,  many 
Americans  believed  there  was  something  innate 
in  the  Irish  and  other  immigrant  groups  that 
caused  them  to  drink. 

Of  the  16  letters  that  complained  of  workers' 
drinking,  12  were  written  to  individuals  with  Irish 
surnames.  That  evidence  in  itself  is  not  proof  of 
prejudice  against  the  immigrant  workforce — 
they  may  in  fact  have  been  drinking.  But  it  is 
suggestive  of  it,  as  foreign-born  workers  were 
discriminated  against  in  other  ways,  such  as  in 
wages  and  housing  (Dublin  1979: 149-164). 

Annie  Driscoll  was  one  of  the  Irish  so  accused. 
In  1889  Marshall  complained  to  keeper  George 
Kittredge  (letter  10) 

We  are  informed  that  Annie  Driscoll  who  has  been 
working  for  Mr.  Dearborn — has  been  drunk  at  your 
house  all  this  week — You  probably  know  that  this 
is  contrary  to  your  order  from  agt.  and  that  all  cases 
of  drunkenness  must  be  reported  to  the  counting 
room.  You  will  at  once  dismiss  Driscoll  from  your 


house  and  look  out  for  any  further  violation  of  the 
rules. 

Two  years  later,  an  overseer,  Mr.  Houston, 
received  the  following  letter  (letter  21)  about  the 
behavior  of  one  of  his  mill  hands  who  lived  in 
keeper  Enoch  Hutchins'  house. 

Mr.  Hutchins  reports  that  last  night  David  O'Hara 
was  drunk  in  his  house  and  making  disturbance  and 
brought  bottles  of  liquor  into  the  house.  You  will 
please  discharge  him  and  not  again  employ  him. 

Marshall  sent  a  total  of  9  letters  that  either 
reprimanded  Enoch  Hutchins,  or  notified 
overseers  to  dismiss  one  of  Hutchins'  boarders 
because  of  alcohol  use.  The  artifactual  evidence 
recovered  from  the  backlot  of  Boott  #44  and  #45 
indicates  there  was  truth  to  Marshall's 
suspicions.  In  October  of  1890,  Enoch  Hutchins 
received  the  following  letter  about  one  of  his 
boarders,  Annie  Pierce  (letter  17).  An  earlier 
correspondence  (letter  15)  indicates  that 
Marshall  understood  that  Pierce,  also  known  as 
McGinness,  had  worked  in  overseer  Lawley's 
mill  room  until  she  left  the  Boott  and  began  to 
work  at  the  Merrimack  Mills;  she  then  returned 
to  the  Boott  and  overseer  Rice  rehired  her. 
Marshall  stated 

I  have  looked  into  the  case  of  Annie  Pierce,  alias 
McGinness  and  Mr.  Lawley  says  she  left  him  Labor 
Day  claiming  to  be  sick  but  that  she  went  off  riding 
with  a  fellow  and  another  girl,  and  that  he  saw 
them  drunk  and  disorderly  on  the  streets,  and  he 
has  seen  her  on  several  occasions.  Her  father  says 
that  she  did  not  leave  your  home  (illegible)  to  work 
and  board  on  Merrimack  Corporation,  as  she  claims, 
but  has  continued  boarding  with  you  all  the  time, 
and  when  she  went  to  work  for  Rice,  she  changed 
her  name  from  McGinness  to  Pierce  and  that  you 
changed  it  same  on  your  books.  From  reports,  she  is 
a  bad  girl,  and  not  entitled  to  remain  on  our 
corporation,  and  Mr.  Rice  will  dismiss  her  as  he  can 
fill  her  place,  and  you  must  also  discharge  her  from 
your  house — I  will  say  that  our  books  show  that 
she  left  Lawley  Sept.  1st  and  commenced  work  for 
Rice  Sept.  17th — 2  and  two  seventh  weeks 
afterwards.  Report  also  comes  that  you  have  a 
great  deal  of  drunkenness  in  your  house  and  don't 
report  it  in  counting  room.  You  must  be  careful  to  run 
your  house  a  little  more  strict  and  not  allow  any 
drunkenness  in  it,  nor  any  profanity  or  disturbance 
and  report  at  our  office  all  cases  of  this  kind  which 
may  arise  that  we  may  purify  our  corporation  by 
discharging  the  offenders. 

Ironically,  none  of  the  published  accounts  of 
post-Civil  War  mill  regulations  included  an 
explicit  ban  on  alcohol  use  (Boston  Globe  1886: 
n.p.;  1876  Massachusetts  Cotton  Mills 
Regulations,  cited  in  Kenngott  1912:  24; 
Massachusetts  Bureau  of  Statistics  of  Labor 
1882).  Yet,  as  the  letters  attest,  proscription  of 
liquor  was  still  in  effect  at  the  Boott.  The 
disparity  between  the  published  regulations  and 
the  letters  suggests  two  facets  to  management's 


30  The  Boardinghouse  System  as  A  Way  of  Life 


attitude  toward  liquor.  First,  it  is  likely  that  there 
was  no  longer  any  need  to  be  explicit  about  the 
regulation  against  alcohol.  The  assumption 
must  have  been  that  the  corporations'  policy  on 
alcohol  use  was  common  knowledge.  Second, 
silence  was  one  method  of  dealing  with  the 
reality  of  the  situation.  Despite  the  assertion 
that  they  wished  to  "purify"  the  corporation, 
management  had,  on  some  level,  realized  they 
would  not  be  able  to  enforce  the  regulation. 
Workers  drank  for  a  variety  of  reasons — ethnic 
customs,  as  means  to  promote  working-class 
solidarity,  and  to  temporarily  escape  from  the 
realities  of  poverty — it  was  behavior  the  workers 
chose  for  themselves.  If  a  worker  wished  to  drink 
whiskey,  no  amount  of  "moral"  lecturing  would 
change  that  fact.  Drinking  belied  the  image  that 
mill  management  wished  to  project,  however,  as 
"moral,"  orderly,  and  in  full  control  of  the 
workforce.  Therefore,  managment  avoided  a 
public  discussion  of  the  subject. 

The  content  of  the  dismissals  and  complaints 
suggests  that  Cumnock  objected  to  workers' 
aberrant  behavior  when  it  was  in  the  public  eye 
aswell  as  to  publicly  visible  damage  to  the 
housing.  Drinking  and  inebriation  could  not  be 
ignored.  Drunken  employees  created  a  less 
profitable  workforce,  and  their  deportment  was 
highly  visible  to  the  citizens  of  Lowell.  Loafing 
on  street  corners  and  gatherings  of  individuals 
(like  the  group  of  workers  playing  cards  in  the 
courtyard  of  a  Homestead,  Pennsylvania, 
tenement;  Figure  3-2)  was  public  behavior. 
Trash  on  a  roof  was  a  visible  sign  of  disorder.  In 
the  letter  to  attorneys  Marshall  and  Hamblet, 
James  Marshall  questioned  whether  the  grocer, 
who  wished  to  sell  off  the  keepers'  belongings, 
could  "use  our  building  for  the  purpose  of 
displaying  goods  by  auction."  A  public  auction 
would  have  been  an  embarrassment  to  the  mill. 

None  of  the  letters  discussed  conditions  of  the 
interior  of  the  housing,  and,  only  once  does 
Marshall  mention  repairs  to  the  inside  of  a  unit 
and  then  only  in  the  vaguest  of  terms  (letter  39). 
Marshall  wrote  to  a  woman  who  was  being 
evicted  that,  before  the  new  residents  moved  in, 
Mr.  Cumnock  "says  he  shall  do  some  repairs  in 
your  house."  Only  two  letters,  the  reprimand 
sent  to  Mr.  Gardner  (letter  9)  and  the  letter  sent 
to  Mr.  Fay  (letter  53)  concerned  the  condition  of 
backlots;  one  would  suspect  that  the  letters  were 
sent  because  the  situation  was  severe  enough 
that  management  had  no  choice  but  to  attend  to 
the  drains.  For  the  most  part,  however,  what  was 
hidden,  out  of  public  view,  was  ignored. 

In  his  letter  to  Hutchins,  Marshall  asserted 
that  management  wished  to  "purify  our 
corporation  by  discharging  the  offenders."    The 


paymaster's  choice  of  words  is  telling.  Because 
management  could  neither  fully  control  the 
workforce  nor  completely  eliminate  certain 
behaviors,  they  merely  expelled  the  "corrupt" 
individuals  from  the  corporation  so  that  the 
faqade  of  moral  purity  and  order  could  be 
maintained. 


Conversion    of  Boardinghouses  and   Availability 
of  Housing 

Marshall  sent  12  letters  to  10  individuals 
regarding  rental  of  the  Boott's  housing  or 
eviction  from  a  unit  because  of  the  mills'  plans 
to  convert  a  portion  of  the  boardinghouses  to 
tenements. 

On  February  11,  1889,  per  Mr.  Cumnock's 
orders,  James  Marshall  wrote  to  Mrs.  L.  D. 
Leadbetter  (letter  37);  Mrs.  Leadbetter  ran 
aboardinghouse  at  43  Boott.  The  body  of  the 
letter  read 

It  is  our  intention  to  close  some  of  our  boarding 
houses  and  make  some  into  private  tenements,  and 
in  persuance  of  this  plan  this  is  to  give  you  notice 
that  we  desire  you  to  vacate  your  tenement  to  us  by 
15th  of  April  next. 

That  same  day  Marshall  sent  a  similar  letter  to 
Mrs.  Davis,  a  keeper  at  #30  Boott  (letter  38).  He 
told  her  that  #21  Boott,  a  boardinghouse  run  by 
Mrs.  Bixby,  was  to  be  converted  to  a  tenement. 
Mrs.  Bixby  would  vacate  her  unit  and  be 
permitted  to  move  into  #30,  and  Mrs.  Davis 
would  have  to  leave.  And,  in  September  of  that 
year,  Mrs.  McDonald  at  #20  Boott  (letter  42)  was 
given  similar  notice.  Marshall  was  careful  to 
point  out,  however,  that  there  was  "no 
dissatisfaction  with  you  or  your  house  only  now 
we  don't  need  as  many  boarding  houses." 

As  the  letters  indicate,  by  the  late  1880s  the 
Boott  had  begun  to  increase  the  number  of 
tenement  units.  In  letter  #48,  regarding  a 
prospective  tenant,  the  paymaster  allowed  as  the 
office  was  "besieged  with  applicants"  for  the 
tenements.  To  a  certain  extent,  the  increase  in 
demand  for  family-type  housing,  as  opposed  to 
the  communal  boardinghouses,  reflected  the 
fact  that,  once  the  immigrants  arrived,  more 
families  worked  in  the  mills.  But  tenement 
housing  also  would  have  afforded  workers  a  bit 
more  autonomy  over  their  own  lives  than  life  in  a 
boardinghouse.  While  still  subject  to  the  mills' 
schedule  and  regulations,  tenements  afforded 
more  privacy  and  freedom  to  prepare  meals  and 
furnish  the  house  as  one  liked  (and  could 
afford). 

Whether  their  actions  were  based  on  seniority 
of  employment,  number  of  years  in  the  units, 
personal  feelings  toward   individuals,  or  the 


The  Documentary  Record  of  Social  Control    31 


T3 

c 

<T3 
O 

o 
bb 

ifl 

c 

o 

E 

CQ 

o 

I 

6 

o 

(0 

i- 

^H 

o 

•a 

at 

-a 

t- 

3 

T3 

>. 

o 

Ih 

a, 

a 

0) 

o 

Ih 

o 

X 

a 

&, 

X 

60 

c 

O 

4-i 

o 

in 

X 

•a 

a. 

i* 

TS 

QJ 

u 

c 

bo 

X 

c 

l/> 

'>, 

"I 

nj 

oL 

n— ' 

c 

CJ 

£ 

ai 

■^ 

3 

o 

o 

a, 

bO 

•3 

_c 

0 

•5 

L- 

l-H 

bC 

03 

o 

< 

Xi 

ro 

ri 

c 

1 

A3 

rt 

> 

a 

bo 

a;  as 

il 

C-  .- 

32   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  A  Way  of  Life 


whims  of  agent  Cumnock,  management  was 
inconsistent  in  the  wording  of  eviction  notices. 
In  some  instances,  such  as  Mrs.  Davis's, 
occupants  were  to  move  out  with  no  offer  of 
other  housing;  in  other  cases,  Mrs.  Bixby's,  for 
example,  they  were  provided  with  other  housing 
when  their  boardinghouses  were  converted. 
Some  residents  were  given  several  months  to 
vacate,  others  barely  one  month.  Moreover, 
Marshall  apologized  to  only  one  individual, 
William  Marland,  for  the  eviction  (letter  44). 
Marland's  position  as  an  overseer  may  have 
played  a  role  in  the  apology.  He  wrote  to 
Marland  that  the  unit  was  to  be  rented  to 
another  overseer  who  was  in  need  of  housing, 
and  added,  "we  are  very  sorry  to  be  obliged  to  do 
this  but  can't  help  it." 


Repairs  to  Units  and  Cost  of  Utilities 

Of  these  5  letters,  3  inquire  about  charges  due 
on  city  water  bills,  one  concerns  a  leaky  privy 
vault,  one  a  broken  hitching  post. 

Documentary  research  (Bell  1987a:  61-65) 
provides  clear  evidence  that,  as  the  century 
progressed,  the  Lowell  Board  of  Health  became 
concerned  about  leakage  from  privy  vaults  into 
well  water  (leakage  did  occur  at  the  Boott — see 
letter  58  cited  below);  in  1893  the  Board  even 
analyzed  water  from  one  of  the  Boott 
boardinghouse  wells,  but  no  results  were 
published.  Although  the  Boott  had  begun  to 
install  connections  from  the  housing  to  the  city 
water  supply  as  early  as  1874,  Bell's  research 
indicates  that  occupants  of  some  of  the  units 
continued  to  draw  well  water  into  the  early  20th 
century. 

For  some  Boott  residents  the  luxury  of  city- 
supplied  water  was  a  financial  burden.  In  May 
of  1889,  Marshall  wrote  to  Millard  Wright, 
Superintendent  of  the  Water  Works,  on  behalf 
of  tenant  John  O'Hare;  O'Hare  felt  he  had  been 
overcharged  on  his  water  bill  (letter  49).  In 
October  of  1890,  Marshall  evicted  the  man 
because  he  was  six  months  behind  on  payment 
of  the  bill  (letter  52).  In  letter  50  the  paymaster 
complained  to  another  tenant,  Mr.  William 
Hibbard,  about  a  four-month  balance  on  his 
water  bill. 

The  Lowell  Board  of  Health  records  (Bell 
1987a:  60-63)  and  information  contained  in  the 
letters  suggests  that  the  shift  from  corporation- 
built  privies  to  a  city-managed  sewage  system 
began  in  the  late  1880s.  The  privy  vaults  had 
become  an  increasing  nuisance  for  the  Board, 
both  because  of  problems  with  leakage  and 
because  their  use  was  a  sign  of  backwardness,  "a 
relic  of  a  by-gone  age"  (Lowell  Board  of  Health 


1891:  18,  quoted  in  Bell  1987a:  62).  In  April  of 
1890  the  Board  officially  ordered  the 
corporations'  privies  removed  within  60  days,  but 
the  Board  stated  in  the  report  of  that  year  that 
removal  had  begun  in  1887. 

Not  all  of  the  Boott  privies  were  filled  within 
the  60-day  stipulation.  On  April  17,  1891  (letter 
53),  the  paymaster  requested  John  Fay,  the  man 
licensed  by  the  city  to  clean  privies,  to  repair  a 
leaky  connection  to  a  vault  behind  Boott  #30. 
Further,  it  is  unclear  precisely  when  #45  and  #48, 
the  two  units  explored  archeologically,  were 
connected  to  city  sewage  systems.  In  letter  49  to 
Mr.  Wright,  dated  May  24,  1889,  Marshall 
inquired  whether  the  Superintendent  had 
overlooked  the  water  charges  for  the  "W. 
Closets"  for  units  33-48.  The  artifactual 
evidence  suggests,  however,  that  the  privies  were 
not  filled  until  after  ca.  1910.  It  is  evident, 
however,  that  despite  the  fact  that  workers' 
health  depended  in  part  on  clean  water  and 
sanitary  conditions,  "the  textile  workers,  by 
whom  these  services  were  needed,  had  little 
control  over  the  form  and  condition  of  such 
facilities"  (Bell  1987a:  68). 


Employees'   Debts,    Wages,  Illness,  and  Death 

Three  letters  in  this  category  discuss  workers' 
debts,  two  concern  wages  due,  one  concerns  an 
employee's  illness,  and  one  is  a  response  to  an 
inquiry  about  length  of  employment  of  a  former 
Boott  worker. 

The  letters  are  testament  to  Marshall's 
competency  as  a  paymaster.  They  indicate  that 
not  only  did  he  keep  precise  accounts,  but  that 
he  followed  Cumnock's  orders  closely. 
Employees  wages  and  debts  are  the  only  areas  in 
which  the  paymaster  appeared  to  have  any 
autonomy,  for  he  did  not  include  the  phrase  "per 
order  agent"  in  many  of  the  letters  that  dealt 
with  the  issues  of  finance. 

In  letter  56,  regarding  a  "consumptive" 
employee,  Marshall  wrote  Cumnock,  who  was 
away  from  the  mill,  that  Maggie  Bell  might  have 
to  be  hospitalized  and,  if  so,  another  worker 
"would  be  responsible"  for  the  costs.  Marshall 
added,  however,  "Dr.  doesn't  see  why  case  can't 
rest  until  your  return."  Clearly,  Marshall 
preferred  (or  was  obligated)  to  wait  for 
Cumnock's  response  before  taking  any  action. 

In  the  case  of  the  wages  due  Elizabeth  Mullen 
(letter  59),  Marshall  was  willing  to  pay  out  exactly 
what  was  owed  but  not  a  penny  more.  Mullen, 
who  had  died  suddenly,  was  due  $4.71  in  wages. 
A  man  requested  the  wages,  which  he  claimed 
would  be  used  for  funeral  expenses;  Marshall, 
however,  refused  payment  until  the  claim  could 


The  Documentary  Record  of  Social  Control    33 


be  verified  so  "that  we  shall  not  be  called  upon 
to  pay  2nd  time." 

Sarah  Norcross  (letter  58),  who  had  boarded  in 
#45  for  at  least  10  years  (1890  Lowell  City 
Directory  ;  1880  federal  census),  left  the  Boott, 
apparently  because  of  ill  health,  and  the 
paymaster  enclosed  in  his  letter  her  wages  of 
$25,  with  added  interest  of  $1.37.  Not  only  does 
this  letter  attest  to  Marshall's  desire  to  settle 
accounts,  but  it  is  the  only  letter  which  indicates 
a  friendship  seems  to  have  existed  between  the 
paymaster  and  an  employee.  Marshall  stated, 
"am  glad  to  hear  from  you  and  to  know  that  your 
health  has  improved  since  you  went  east." 

Letter  60  settles  accounts  with  the  Whipples, 
former  Boott  employees  who  had  lived  in  one  of 
the  tenements.  Marshall  confirms  that  their 
rent  and  water  bill  had  been  paid  and  that,  at 
Mrs.  Whipple's  orders,  the  balance  of  their 
wages  should  be  given  over  to  John  Buttrick. 
According  to  the  1890  Lowell  City  Directory, 
Buttrick  was  in  business  with  F.  H.  Butler  &  Co.,  a 
Lowell  apothecary. 

Perhaps  one  of  the  Whipples  had  been  ill  and 
purchased  a  quantity  of  proprietary  medicine.  If 
so,  he  or  she  would  have  been  in  good  company; 
medicine  bottles  were  recovered  in  large 
quantities  from  the  backlots  of  #45  and  #48  (see 
Chapter  8,  this  volume).  "Patent"  medicines 
were  widely  used  during  the  19th  century  both 
because  of  their  supposed  restorative  powers, 
and  because  the  nostrums  often  contained 
drugs  such  as  codeine,  morphine,  and  alcohol 
(Stage  1979:  32;  Williams  1980:  544).  The  cures 
would  have  provided  relief  for  the  mill  workers 
who  felt  debilitated  much  of  the  time  from  the 
long  hours  at  work  and  conditions  in  the  mill 
rooms. 

Two  letters  were  written  to  attorneys  who 
attempted  to  garnish  the  wages  of  workers  who 
were  in  debt.  Marshall  stated  these  workers  had 
"sold  their  pay"  (five  other  letters  in  the 
"complaints"  section  also  dismissed  employees 
who,  along  with  other  infractions,  had  sold  their 
pay). 

A  worker  who  sold  his  pay  had  been 
"trusteed."  The  MBSL  (1882:  216)  explained  the 
procedure.  When  a  worker  fell  behind  in  a 
payment  to  a  merchant,  mill  management  was 
served  a  legal  writ,  a  trustee,  to  garnish  the 
worker's  wages.  A  Lowell  mill  worker  stated  in 
the  same  report  that  a  worker  was  discharged 
after  he  or  she  had  been  trusteed  twice.  At  least 
in  one  instance,  however,  the  Boott  did  not 
permit  an  employee  a  second  chance.  On  May 
7,  1891  (letter  31),  mill  worker  Henry  Ashton  sold 
his  pay.  The  next  day,  in  a  letter  to  overseer 
Newell  Abare,  Marshall  questioned  why  Ashton 


was  even  employed  at  the  Boott;  the  mill  worker 
had  sold  his  pay  on  April  1  and  had  been  fired. 
To  rehire  him  was  "contrary  to  agent's  orders." 

Mr.  Vernette  and  Mr.  McLarty  had  both  been 
trusteed  (letters  55  and  57),  and  attorneys  had 
written  to  Marshall  hoping  to  collect  the  wages. 
Marshall  refused  to  pay  either  of  the  attorneys. 
In  Mr.  McLarty's  case,  Marshall  preferred  to  let 
a  judge  decide  the  case.  The  paymaster 
suggested  that  "probably  Vernette  worked 
under  an  alias"  as  his  name  did  not  appear  on 
the  employee  list.  Marshall  had  also  accused 
one  other  employee,  Annie  "Pierce,"  of 
changing  her  name  (letter  17).  The 
straightforward  tone  of  the  paymaster's  letter 
suggests  that  using  an  alias  was  not  an  unusual 
tactic;  when  workers  were  in  financial  or  other 
sorts  of  difficulties,  the  tactic  must  have  been 
used  to  hide  ones'  problems  from  management 
and  remain  employed. 


Indirect  Control  of  the  Workforce 

Mill    Influence    in    the    Temperance    Movement 
and  in  City  Policy 

One  of  the  most  effective  ways  to  regulate  the 
lives  of  labor  in  the  workplace  and  in  the  home  is 
through  indirect  control.  Intervention  through 
ideological  and  political  mechanisms  can 
"diffuse  the  target  of  labor's  discontent"  (Harvey 
1976:  283).  In  Lowell,  mill  managements' 
attempts  to  "purify"  the  corporation  extended 
beyond  the  bounds  of  company  property;  it 
extended  into  the  temperance  movement  and 
into  local  politics. 

The  Lowell  industrialists  took  an  active  role  in 
the  temperance  movement.  William  Austin, 
agent  of  the  Lawrence  Mill,  was  one  of  the  first 
presidents  of  the  Lowell  Temperance  Society 
(Coburn  1920:  207).  In  1840,  the  Lowell  City 
Directory  listed  John  Clark,  superintendent  of 
the  Merrimack  Manufacturing  Company,  as  the 
Society's  president  and  an  agent  of  the 
Lawrence  Mill,  John  Aiken,  as  a  vice  president. 
Linus  Child,  who  in  1845  became  the  second 
agent  at  the  Boott,  had,  as  a  state  legislator,  been 
influential  in  passing  one  of  Massachusetts'  first 
temperance  bills  (Clark  1864:  11).  In  1860,  Child, 
along  with  Lawrence  agent  William  Southworth, 
presented  a  petition  before  the  Lowell  mayor 
and  city  aldermen.  Signed,  they  said,  by  more 
than  1500  women  of  Lowell,  it  advocated  strict 
enforcement  of  prohibition  legislation  (Peoples 
Document  1860:  2). 

Mill  management  influenced  city  policy 
regarding  liquor  licenses;  mill  supervisory 
personnel  were  often  elected  to  the  city  council, 
and,  until  1894,  aldermen  on  the  city  council 


34   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  A  Way  of  Life 


granted  liquor  licenses  (Lowell  City  Documents 
1895:  45;  Lubar  1983:  11).  Lists  of  city  officials  in 
the  Lowell  City  Documents  indicate  that  from 
1837  onward,  the  year  after  Lowell  was 
incorporated  as  a  city,  a  Boott  overseer, 
machinist,  superintendent,  or  agent  was,  more 
often  than  not,  a  Council  member. 

Lower-level  supervisory  mill  personnel  were 
more  frequently  elected  than  agents.  In  1855, 
Homer  Bartlett,  the  Massachusetts  Mills 
Treasurer  and  its  former  Agent,  stated 

Holding  the  office  I  do,  I  dont  consider  it  proper  to 
take  an  active  part  in  the  way  of  addressing  public 
meetings — Our  stockholders  have  always  been  very 
sensative  on  this  subject  and  unwilling  that  their 
Treasurers  and  Agents  should  enter  into  politics 
(Bartlett  1855,  quoted  in  Bell  1987b:  19). 

As  Bell  suggests,  because  of  corporation  views, 
Bartlett  did  not  consider  it  "proper"  to  enter 
highly  public  political  races.  If  this  attitude  did 
in  fact  constrain  Lowell  agents,  perhaps  lower- 
level,  less  visible  personnel,  such  as  overseers, 
were  urged  to  run  on  behalf  of  the  mill.  No 
doubt  mill  employees  did  not  always  parrot  the 
views  of  management,  but  they  did  have  the 
ability  to  influence  city  policy  to  the  mills' 
advantage. 

There  is  strong  evidence  that  the  Boott  used 
indirect  methods  to  limit  the  number  of  taverns 
in  the  area  directly  outside  the  mill  gates.  The 
attempt  to  limit  the  sale  of  alcohol  around  an 
industrial  area  was  not  a  unique  one.  In 
Pennsylvania,  the  state  legislature  passed 
numerous  acts  that  forbade  taverns  within  a 
three-mile  radius  of  an  industrial  site  (Tyrrell 
1979:  107).  Management's  actions  would  have 
prevented  no  one  from  walking  the  few  extra 
blocks  to  purchase  a  pint,  and  "illegal"  saloons 
could  have  operated  in  basements  and 
storefronts  quite  close  to  the  mill  gates.3  But  the 
line  was  a  symbolic  boundary;  it  was  one  further 
method  of  making  the  Boott's  presence  felt. 

In  1868,  the  first  year  of  licensing  in  Lowell 
following  a  16-year  attempt  at  statewide 
prohibition  (Turner  1972:  34),  the  Lowell  City 
Directory  indicates  that  no  saloons  were 
licensed  in  the  four-block  area  bounded  by  the 
Boott,  Merrimack  Street,  Kirk  Street,  and  Bridge 
Street.  In  1880,  one  licensed  saloon  operated  on 
Paige  Street;  according  to  the  Directory,  that 


6  In  the  1895  Report  of  the  Chief  of  Police  in  the  Lowell 
City  Documents  (1895:  6),  the  chief  stated  that  liquor 
was  often  sold  from  tenements,  particularly  on  Sundays. 
He  added  that  when  tenants  had  a  common  entrance,  it 
was  difficult  to  tell  which  kitchen  was  being  used  to 
dispense  the  liqour,  and  that  lookouts  were  posted  on  the 
street  to  warn  of  police  presence. 


number  increased  to  six  in  1888.  There  was  also 
one  tavern  on  John  Street  and  one  on  Bridge 
Street.  In  that  year,  the  City  Council  received  a 
request  from  the  John  Street  Church  to  revoke 
all  liquor  licenses  on  Paige  Street,  and  the 
request  was  granted  (Evening  Citizen,  April  7, 
1888;  Vox  Populi,  May  19, 1888). 

The  Church  was  linked  to  the  Boott  via  Newell 
Abare;  Abare,  a  Boott  overseer,  was  sexton  of  the 
church,  and,  in  1890,  he  became  a  city 
councilman  (Lowell  City  Directory  1889;  Lowell 
City  Documents  1890:  43).  No  further  licenses 
were  granted  on  Paige  Street  for  the  rest  of  the 
century.  Whether  this  action  was  influenced  by 
the  Church  or  the  Boott,  or  both,  is  unclear.  One 
piece  of  evidence  indicates,  however,  that  the 
ban  on  licenses  on  Paige  Street  was  in  keeping 
with  the  wishes  of  the  mill. 

Beginning  in  1899,  the  Boott  sold  off  most  of 
the  corporation's  housing  to  real  estate  investor 
Saiman  Sirk  (Middlesex  County  Deeds  Book 
314:  206).  One  contemporary  writer  asserts  that 
real  estate  speculators  such  as  Sirk  increased 
rents  and  allowed  conditions  in  the  housing  to 
deteriorate  (Kenngott  1912:  28).  Some  of  the 
units  may  have  become  lodginghouses,  where 
workers  slept,  going  elsewhere  for  their  meals 
(Bond  1987:  41). 

But  the  indirect  method  of  control  of  workers 
that  was  used  by  Boott  management  continued. 
There  was  a  stipulation  in  the  deed  to  Sirk  that 
the  conveyance  was  made  subject  to  the 
perpetual  restriction  that  no  intoxicating  liquor 
ever  be  sold  on  any  part  of  the  premises.  The 
purpose  of  the  stipulation  was,  presumably,  to 
exclude  working-class  saloons  from  being 
established  adjacent  to  the  mill  yard.  The  only 
exception  to  the  restriction  was  one  row  of 
housing  on  Bridge  Street.  It  is  likely  that  Bridge 
Street  was  excluded  because  it  was  a  major 
commercial  street,  and,  perhaps,  because  Sirk 
remodeled  the  Bridge  Street  housing  into  an 
apartment  building  (Clancey  1987:  32).  This 
block  would  have  been  unlikely  to  have  housed 
the  immigrant  workforce. 


Conclusions 

The  image  of  threads  woven  together  in  a 
loom  is  almost  unavoidable  when  one  visualizes 
the  tension  between  workers  and  management 
at  the  Lowell  mills.  The  metaphor  will  not  be 
belabored.  But  it  is  as  if  the  warp — threads 
stretched  lengthwise — were  the  rules  and 
policies  of  the  mill  system.  The  weft — threads 
that  crossed  over  and  under  the  warp — were  the 
steps  taken  by  workers  and  management, 
spread  over  time,  that  altered  the  system.    The 


The  Documentary  Record  of  Social  Control    35 


spread  over  time,  that  altered  the  system.  The 
basic  mill  system  was  a  constant,  but  the  pull 
between  the  desires  of  workers  and  those  of 
management  altered  the  fabric  of  the  system. 

Within  the  system,  regulations  were 
established  that  governed  every  aspect  of 
workers'  lives.  Initially,  workers  were  housed, 
fed,  and  provided  with  religious  as  well  as 
secular  education.  Once  the  immigrants 
became  the  dominant  workforce,  these 
provisions,  but  not  the  regulations,  ceased  to  be 
seen  as  a  necessity  by  management.  The  sturdy 
brick  faqades  of  the  boardinghouses — highly 
visible  structures — and  the  public  testimony  on 
the  importance  of  religious  education,  however, 
were  still  used  by  the  industrialists  as  pointed 
reminders  to  the  Lowell  populace  that  the  mill 
system  was  built  upon  a  firm,  "moral" 
foundation. 

The  appearance  of  neatness  and  order  was 
vital  to  the  success  of  the  enterprise;  it  is 
questionable,  however,  whether  management 
was  ever  vigilant  in  upkeep  of  the  housing, 
particularly  what  was  hidden  from  public  view.  A 
certain  standard  was  necessary  to  attract  the  mill 
women  to  Lowell,  but,  as  the  century  progressed, 
as  the  immigrant  workforce  entered  the  mills, 
and  as  the  economic  pressures  of 
manufacturing  increased,  less  money  was  spent 
on  the  units.  The  Boott  letters  and  other  sources 
attest  that  the  housing  was  equipped  with 
leaking,  outmoded  privies,  polluted  wells,  and 
that  management  turned  its  back  on  the 
conditions  of  the  boardinghouse  interiors. 

Yet  behavior  that  was  public  in  nature — noise, 
disorder,  and  especially  drunkenness — belied 
the  image  of  an  "orderly"  workforce  in  a  "moral" 
environment.  Because  the  reality  of  drunken 
employees  did  not  jibe  with  the  way  in  which  the 
mills  wished  to  be  perceived,  management 
avoided  a  discussion  of  the  subject.  Individuals 
who  loafed  on  the  street,  threw  trash  onto  the 
roofs,  or  carried  bottles  of  liquor  into  the  mills' 
housing  were  chastised  or  fired. 

This  effort  to  regulate  public  behavior  of 
workers  went  beyond  the  confines  of  mill 
property.  Boott  management  attempted  to  limit 
the  number  of  saloons  near  the  millyard,  and 
this  policy  continued  even  after  the  sale  of  the 
housing  to  Saiman  Sirk. 

In  sum,  like  the  Yankee  "mill  girls"  before 
them,  the  foreign-born  workers  had  little  say 
over  aspects  of  their  lives  such  as  hours  of  work, 
wages,  whether  the  housing  was  supplied  with 
clean,  running  water  and  was  in  good  condition, 
and  whether  they  were  evicted  from  the  units  or 
fired.  Management  "held  the  cards"  and  their 
actions — in  everything  from  installation  of  sewer 


systems  to  employee  dismissals — depended  on 
what  was  expedient  at  that  particular  moment. 
Management's  policy  toward  workers  was  also 
influenced  by  an  individual's  ethnicity,  religion, 
and  level  in  the  hierarchy  of  mill  employment. 

As  revealed  by  the  letters,  workers  did, 
however,  take  steps  to  retain  control  over  their 
own  lives.  In  an  attempt  to  stay  solvent  or  to 
increase  a  house's  profitability,  keepers  took  in 
"mealers"  and  ran  several  boardinghouses  at 
once.  Workers  chose  to  live  in  the  tenements 
rather  than  the  communal  boardinghouses 
where  they  would  have  had  a  greater  degree  of 
privacy  and  choice.  Some  steps  were  contrary  to 
mill  policy  or  considered  unacceptable  behavior, 
such  as  the  boarding  of  non-Boott  employees, 
assuming  an  alias,  and  drinking  alcohol  in  the 
Boott's  boardinghouses. 

The  information  gleaned  from  the  letters — 
that  the  boardinghouse  yards  were  messy,  that 
the  overall  condition  of  the  backlots  was  poor, 
and  that  workers  consumed  alcohol  in  the 
units — concurs  with  the  archeological  evidence. 
In  some  instances  the  letters  were  even  written 
to  or  about  individuals  who  lived  in  the  units 
investigated  archeologically.  The  neat,  orderly 
image  of  the  mills  that  the  owners  took  pains  to 
present,  however,  is  made  all  the  more  hollow  by 
the  archeological  evidence.  The  archeology 
helps  to  strip  off  the  facade  of  neatness  and 
order;  in  so  doing,  it  exposes  management's 
attempts  to  regulate  workers'  behavior  without 
taking  equal  responsibility  for  workers'  lives. 
Managers,  however,  could  not  completely 
eliminate  certain  behavior.  They  could  only 
"purify  our  corporation  by  discharging  the 
offenders"  and  remain  vulnerable,  at  least  in  a 
small  way,  to  workers'  attempts  to  retain  control 
of  their  lives. 


36  The  Boardinghouse  System  as  A  Way  of  Life 


Chapter  4 

DOMESTIC  IDEOLOGY  AND  THE  ECONOMICS 
OF  BOARDINGHOUSE  KEEPING 

by  David  B.  Landon 


Introduction 

The  19th  century  was  a  period  of  dynamic 
transition  in  the  United  States.  Large-scale 
urbanization,  industrialization,  and  immigration 
caused  changes  in  the  structure  of  work  and  life 
that  profoundly  affected  the  course  of  American 
development.  The  rapid  growth  of  urban  and 
industrial  areas  of  this  period  provided 
challenges  to  the  family  and  individuals 
attempting  to  adapt  to  new  living  and  working 
conditions.  These  changes  did  not  go  unnoticed 
or  uncontested.  Many  people  were  greatly 
concerned  with  the  shifts  taking  place  in  living 
and  working  arrangements.  The  first  part  of  this 
chapter  will  examine  some  of  the  19th-century 
conceptions  about  alterations  in  the  function  of 
the  household,  and  specifically,  the  position  of 
women's  labor  within  the  home.  This  will 
provide  a  framework  for  a  more  specific  analysis 
of  boarding,  which  was  one  particular  living 
arrangement  that  expanded  during  the  period. 
In  some  of  the  emerging  industrial  centers  of  the 
Northeast,  boarding  became  an  institutionalized 
form  of  housing  that  helped  to  facilitate  the 
transition  to  urban-industrial  society.  The 
boardinghouse  system  in  Lowell,  Massachusetts, 
exemplifies  this  type  of  situation.  During  the 
early  period  of  Lowell's  development  the  textile 
corporations  that  created  the  town  built 
numerous  boardinghouses  to  house  their 
employees,  and  it  is  important  to  try  to 
understand  the  relationship  of  the  Lowell 
boardinghouse  system  to  the  wider  patterns  of 
boarding  during  the  19th  century.  A  certain 
amount  of  research  has  attempted  to  address 
aspects  of  the  boardinghouse  system,  but  the 
social  and  economic  factors  influencing  the 
boardinghouse  keepers  have  often  been 
neglected.  A  major  goal  of  this  discussion  will  be 
to  try  to  examine  boarding  from  the  perspective 
of  people  who  were  taking  in  boarders  or 
running  boardinghouses. 


The  Changing  Nature  of  Women's  Work 

One  of  the  primary  changes  in  domestic  labor 
during  the  course  of  the  19th  century  was  the 
increasing  movement  of  various  components  of 
household  production  out  of  the  household  and 


into  the  general  economy.  As  large  numbers  of 
people  moved  into  urban  settings  and  began 
wage  labor  outside  of  the  household,  the 
household  lost  its  position  as  the  primary  locus 
of  productive  activity.  The  factories  and 
businesses  in  which  these  people  labored 
increasingly  began  to  take  over  production  of 
some  of  the  commodities  that  had  previously 
been  centered  in  the  household.  The  textile 
industry  provides  a  striking  example  of  this 
phenomenon  as  the  traditional  position  of  cloth 
production  within  the  house  was  supplanted  by 
industrialized  factories,  such  as  those  in  Lowell. 
This  transition  of  productive  functions  out  of  the 
house  caused  fundamental  changes  in  the 
nature  of  housework. 

Before  the  effects  of  technology  reached  them, 
women  produced  nearly  everything  their  families 
consumed.  By  the  Civil  War  period,  women  in  the 
expanding  cities  and  towns  were  able  to  buy  not  only 
cloth,  but  butter,  milk,  meat  flour,  and  myriad 
other  household  necessities.  With  the  exception  of 
child-rearing,  most  of  the  work  a  woman  did 
consisted  of  day-to-day  maintenance:  feeding  and 
cleaning  and  mending  and  feeding  and  cleaning. 
Her  tasks  were  fewer  but  they  were  distinctly 
monotonous  and  in  a  tangible  sense  unproductive 
(Shapiro  1986:  12-13). 

The  "unproductive"  nature  of  women's  work  (i.e., 
as  a  rule  women  received  no  compensation  for 
their  work  and  produced  no  tangible  or 
marketable  product)  was  heightened  by  the 
rapidly  expanding  economy  that  increasingly 
defined  the  value  of  labor  solely  in  terms  of 
wages.  With  more  and  more  people 
participating  in  wage-paying  labor  (including 
many  women)  the  unpaid  labor  of  women  in  the 
household  was  in  an  ambiguous  position  of 
indefinite  value.  This  contributed  in  a  very  real 
sense  to  the  development  of  new  definitions  of 
the  appropriate  role  for  women  and  the  value  of 
women's  labor  in  the  household.  While  there 
was  some  debate  about  how  this  new  definition 
of  household  labor  should  be  structured  and 
formed  (e.g.,  Hayden  1981),  the  middle  class 
ideology  that  prevailed  redefined  the  value  of 
household  labor  primarily  by  investing  it  with 
spiritual  and  sentimental  value. 

As  women's  traditional  responsibilities  became  less 
and  less  relevant  to  a  burgeoning  industrial 
economy,  the  sentimental  value  of  home  expanded 


37 


38   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


proportionally.  Moralists,  theologians,  and 
popular  writers  produced  reams  of  literature  aimed 
at  investing  domesticity  with  the  spiritual 
sweetness  of  heaven  itself.  According  to  these 
authorities,  a  woman's  most  impressive  duty  was  to 
make  her  home  a  heaven  in  miniature,  herself  the 
angel  ready  at  the  end  of  each  day  to  receive  and 
revive  the  weary  worker  (Shapiro  1986:  13-14). 

In  addition  to  this  moralistic  image,  the  value 
of  women's  housework  was,  as  the  second  half  of 
the  19th  century  progressed,  increasingly  being 
defined  in  "male"  terms  as  well.  Lack  of  wages 
notwithstanding,  the  proponents  of  "domestic 
science"  began  "a  campaign  to  professionalize 
housekeeping — to  increase  the  dignity  of  the 
woman  as  housekeeper  in  order  to  achieve  for 
her  a  status  equivalent  to  that  which  society 
granted  to  'male'  professions"  (Andrews  and 
Andrews  1974:  311-313).  Continuing  industrial 
development  played  a  dual  role  in  the  formation 
of  these  apparently  contradictory  "professional" 
and  "spiritual"  images  of  household  labor. 

Technology,  as  a  social  force,  stimulated  the  new 
perception  of  the  home  as  a  moral  center  and  the 
woman  as  its  divinely  appointed  ruler;  and 
technology  also  offered  a  source  of  aid  in  elevating 
the  woman's  role  as  professional  housekeeper 
(Andrews  and  Andrews  1974:  313). 

New  mechanical  devices  for  the  home  were 
brought  in,  not  just  as  labor  saving  devices,  but 
also  "as  ornaments  of  technology  which  might 
bestow  on  their  users  the  same  honor  granted  to 
men  who  operated  the  larger  machines  of  the 
factory  system"  (Andrews  and  Andrews  1974: 
317).  Domestic  scientists  tried  to  strengthen  this 
association  by  drawing  on  "mechanistic 
metaphors"  for  the  home  and  focusing  on 
organization  and  efficiency  as  important 
principles  of  housework  (Andrews  and  Andrews 
1974:  317).  This  combination  of  moralistic  and 
domestic  science  imagery  created  a  unique 
definition  for  women's  household  labor.  On  one 
hand  it  was  a  woman's  spiritual  calling,  yet  at  the 
same  time,  the  efficient  and  scientific 
organization  of  this  work  helped  to  elevate  its 
status.  A  woman  was  supposed  to  create  the 
proper  moral  and  spiritual  home  environment 
for  her  family,  but  she  was  supposed  to  do  this  in 
a  professional  manner. 

One  of  the  most  obvious  ways  the  attention  to 
domestic  ideology  can  be  seen  to  have  affected 
the  home  environment  is  the  central  importance 
domestic  ideology  took  on  for  much  of  the 
reform  movement.  Although  progressive 
reformers  addressed  a  whole  range  of  issues,  the 
domestic  environment  was  of  considerable 
importance.  The  moral  imagery  with  which 
domestic  issues  had  been  imbued  contributed 
to  middle  class  proselytization  of  a  domestic 


ideology.  By  teaching  the  urban  poor  and  recent 
immigrants  the  "proper"  way  to  cook  and  clean, 
as  well  as  how  to  decorate  their  houses,  they 
could  be  uplifted  and  "Americanized"  (Cohen 
1986:  264).  Often  this  took  the  form  of  visits  to 
poor  households  by  middle-class  women  who 
"offered  suggestions  on  economical  meals,  good 
housekeeping  routines,  educational  goals  for  the 
children"  and  a  variety  of  other  topics  (Wright 
1981:  128).  Of  crucial  importance  to  a  number  of 
these  reformers  were  lower-class  eating  and 
cooking  habits.  As  one  reformer  wrote, 
"philanthropists  may  urge  what  they  will, — less 
crowding,  purer  air,  better  sanitary  regulations; 
but  this  question  of  food  underlies  all"  (Shapiro 
1986:  134).  In  addition  to  trying  to  influence  diet 
through  home  visits,  reformers  established 
cooking  schools  and  model  kitchens  (Levenstein 
1980).  Even  the  temperance  movement  placed 
emphasis  on  food  and  believed  that  better  food 
and  more  attention  to  cooking  would  result  in 
less  drinking  (Shapiro  1986:  138).  The  concern 
over  the  domestic  environment  and  food 
preparation  was  clearly  larger  than  just  the 
concern  for  the  individual  housewife  but  was 
symbolic  of  a  larger  concern  with  the 
propagation  of  particular  "American"  values. 

This  very  general  discussion  glosses  over 
much  of  the  complexity  involved  in  looking  at 
the  changing  nature  and  perception  of 
housework  during  the  19th  century.  The 
technological  advances  and  other  changes 
associated  with  industrialization  had  a  variety  of 
impacts  on  the  home  environment.  Four  major 
themes  have  been  suggested  that  will  resurface 
to  varying  degrees  throughout  the  remainder  of 
this  chapter.  These  are:  1)  the  increasing 
disassociation  of  aspects  of  production  from  the 
household;  2)  the  moralistic  and  spiritual 
definition  of  women's  household  duties;  3)  the 
introduction  of  technological  innovations  as 
labor  saving  devices  and  as  objects  to 
symbolically  elevate  the  woman's  status;  and  4)  a 
constant  concern  with  household  work  and  the 
domestic  environment  as  an  issue  for  significant 
attention  and  reform.  As  the  focus  shifts 
increasingly  to  the  boardinghouses  the 
importance  of  having  this  larger  understanding 
of  the  changing  perceptions  of  household  labor 
will  become  clear. 


Boardinghouses  as  a   Housing  Alternative 

In  order  to  properly  understand  the  situation 
represented  by  the  Lowell  boardinghouses  it  is 
necessary  to  have  a  more  generalized 
understanding  of  boarding  as  an  economic  and 
social  activity.    This  will  be  approached  from 


Domestic  Ideology  and  Boardinghouse  Economics    39 


several  different  perspectives.  To  start,  an 
attempt  will  be  made  to  view  the  large  corporate 
boardinghouses  as  part  of  a  more 
comprehensive  system  of  boarding  as  a  housing 
alternative  and  to  trace  out  some  of  the 
similarities  to  boarding  on  a  smaller  scale.  An 
important  part  of  this  will  be  to  try  to  see 
boardinghouse  keeping  from  the  perspective  of 
the  keepers  in  terms  of  occupational,  social,  and 
economic  choices.  Finally,  the  focus  will  shift 
specifically  to  the  Lowell  boardinghouses  and 
attempt  to  delineate  some  of  their  particular 
economic  characteristics  with  a  special 
emphasis  on  the  relation  to  the  corporations  and 
the  services  provided  to  boarders. 

While  it  is  easy  to  think  of  the  boardinghouse 
situation  in  Lowell  as  unique,  it  is  more 
appropriate  to  think  of  the  Lowell 
boardinghouses  as  one  end  of  a  range  of 
possible  boarding  situations.  At  one  end  is  the 
household  that  takes  in  a  single  boarder  for  a 
short  period  of  time,  at  the  other,  the  massive 
institutionalized  boardinghouses  of  the 
industrial  system.  In  the  center  of  this  spectrum 
the  lines  become  very  blurred  because  "It  is 
difficult  to  know  when  taking  in  a  couple  of 
lodgers  became  the  sole  support  of  a  household 
or  individual,  [or]  when  it. ..might  be  considered 
running  a  boardinghouse"  (Davidoff  1979:  85- 
86).  The  importance  of  this  is  that  it  forces  the 
realization  that  the  Lowell  boardinghouses  were 
part  of  a  larger  phenomenon  (albeit  one  end  of  a 
range  of  situations)  and  helps  to  affirm  the 
validity  of  trying  to  understand  boarding  by 
looking  at  it  in  a  larger  context. 

In  a  certain  sense  the  practice  of  taking 
boarders  into  the  family,  which  expanded  with 
the  19th-century  growth  of  urban  areas,  was  not 
really  that  much  of  a  break  with  earlier 
traditions. 

The  Colonial  family  included  boarders  as  well  as 
servants  and  apprentices  and  dependent  strangers. 
The  presence  of  strangers  in  the  household  was 
accepted  as  a  normal  part  of  family  organization. 
Town  governments  customarily  boarded  the 
homeless,  poor  or  juveniles  with  families  for  a  fee. 
The  19th-century  American  family  was  an 
accommodating  and  flexible  institution,  as  had 
been  its  eighteenth-  and  seventeenth-century 
predecessors  (Hareven  and  Modell  1973:  467-468). 

With  the  rapid  expansion  of  urban  populations 
and  the  growth  of  industrial  communities  during 
the  19th  century,  the  practice  of  boarding 
became  even  more  important.  Boarding  was 
increasingly  attractive  both  to  families  wishing  to 
supplement  their  income  and  to  new  urban 
residents  in  need  of  affordable  housing. 
Statistics  from  the  mid-1 9th  century  give  an 
indication  of  just  how  prevalent  boarding  was 


among  urban  populations  and  in  smaller 
industrial  communities.  In  the  cotton 
community  of  Rockdale,  Pennsylvania,  one- 
quarter  to  one-half  of  all  the  mill  households 
included  boarders  at  the  time  of  the  1850  census 
(Wallace  1972:  67).  Studies  on  communities  in 
the  Hudson  River  Valley  and  the  cities  of  Buffalo 
and  Detroit  have  suggested  that  at  any  given 
time  during  the  latter  half  of  the  19th  century,  15 
to  20%  of  all  households  were  augmented  by 
nonkin  (Hareven  and  Modell  1973:  468).  In 
Boston,  between  10  and  30%  of  all  households 
were  taking  in  boarders  during  this  period,  and 
in  1860,  6.3%  of  the  total  city  population  was 
living  in  boarding  and  lodging  houses  of  more 
than  five  residents  (Hareven  and  Modell  1973: 
468;  Peel  1986:  816-817).  All  these  figures  tend  to 
suggest  that  boarding  was  quite  a  widespread 
phenomenon  during  the  19th  century.  In  the 
city  of  Lowell,  boarding  was  even  more 
significant.  "Boardinghouse  residents  were 
more  than  simply  a  large  group  in  the  overall 
labor  force.  For  all  practical  purposes,  they  were 
the  labor  force"  (Dublin  1979:  80;  emphasis  in 
original).  Even  as  late  as  1875,  after  the 
corporations  had  started  the  transition  away 
from  boardinghouses,  over  46%  of  the  operatives 
still  resided  in  company  boardinghouses 
(Massachusetts  Bureau  of  the  Statistics  of  Labor 
[hereafter  MBSL]  1882:  293). 


Labor  Opportunities   for  Women 

While  this  suggests  the  wide-spread  nature  of 
boarding  as  a  living  arrangement,  it  is  equally 
valid  to  try  to  understand  the  prevalence  of 
boarding  as  a  potential  working  arrangement  for 
the  boardinghouse  keeper.  In  order  to  gain 
greater  insight  into  boardinghouse  keeping  as 
an  employment  opportunity  for  women  it  is 
useful  to  try  to  put  this  job  within  a  larger  context 
of  the  labor  possibilities  for  women.  In  1884  and 
1889,  respectively,  the  Massachusetts  Bureau  of 
the  Statistics  of  Labor  published  studies  of  the 
working  women  of  Boston  and  the  state  of 
Massachusetts.  An  examination  of  the  manner 
in  which  they  grouped  particular  jobs  and  the 
number  of  women  employed  in  different  jobs 
can  offer  a  great  deal  of  information.  The  jobs  of 
working  women  in  Boston  are  shown  in  Table  4-1 
(MBSL  1884:  6-11). 

While  all  of  these  categories  were  broken 
down  into  numerous  sub-categories,  the 
principle  category  of  interest  is  that  of  Domestic 
and  Personal,  which  was  broken  down  into 
enough  detail  to  list  boardinghouse  keepers 
(MBSL  1884:  6;  Table  4-2). 


40   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Table  4-1.  Employment  distribution  of  Boston  women  in 
1884. 


Occupational   Category 
Government  &  professional 
Domestic  &  personal 
Trade  &  transportation 
Agriculture 

Manufactures  &  mechanical 
Apprentices,  laborers,  misc. 
Total  women  employed 


# 

% 

2,326 

5.9 

20,115 

51.7 

3,167 

8.1 

20 

0.1 

12,863 

33.1 

390 

1.1 

38,881 

99.9 

Table  4-2.     Employment  in  domestic  and  personal 
service  for  Boston  women  in  1884. 

Occupational   Category  # 

Boarding  &  lodging  1,883 

Boardinghouse  keepers  452 

Hotel  keepers  14 

Hotel  and  restaurant  clerks  15 

Hotel  and  restaurant  employes  1,366 

Restaurant  keepers  19 

Saloon  keepers  17 

Domestic  service  15,966 

Personal  office  2,266 

Total  domestic  &  personal  service  20,1 15 


For  purposes  of  clarification,  all  15,966  women 
involved  in  domestic  service  were  domestics. 
Personal  service,  while  encompassing  a  variety 
of  different  occupations,  was  almost  entirely 
laundresses  (1,435),  nurses  (552),  and 
hairdressers  (106),  collectively  representing 
92.3%  of  the  women  employed  in  personal 
service. 

One  thing  that  should  immediately  be  noticed 
is  that  boardinghouse  keeping  was  perceived  as 
being  related  to  other  services  that  provided 
food  and  lodging,  such  as  hotels  and  restaurants. 
This  points  out  the  economic  nature  of 
boardinghouse  keeping  as  part  of  a  larger 
service  industry.  It  is  also  clear  just  how 
significant  boardinghouse  keeping  was  as  a 
women's  occupation  in  Boston.  The  452 
boardinghouse  keepers  listed  were  women  who 
ran  houses  professionally.  This  underestimates 
the  true  extent  of  boarding  by  excluding,  for 
instance,  families  who  took  in  a  single  boarder  or 
operated  on  a  similarly  small,  non-professional 
scale.  Even  with  the  expectation  that  this  figure 
underrepresents  boarding,  keeping  of 
boardinghouses  was  a  very  significant 
occupation  for  women.  The  survey  of  Boston 
women's  occupations  from  which  these  figures 
were  drawn  included  222  different  jobs  women 
held  in  the  city.  Of  all  of  these,  boardinghouse 
keeping  ranked  tenth  in  terms  of  the  total 
number  of  women  employed  (MBSL  1884:  6-11). 


Together,  the  top  ten  occupations  made  up 
almost  82%  of  the  total  number  of  employed 
women.  These  jobs  were,  in  order,  domestics 
(15,966),  dress  makers  (5,511),  tailoresses  (3,013), 
store  clerks  (1,475),  laundresses  (1,435),  hotel  and 
restaurant  employees  (1,366),  teachers  (1,319), 
milliners  (716),  nurses  (552),  and  boardinghouse 
keepers  (452).  Clearly,  boardinghouse  keeping, 
though  dwarfed  by  some  of  the  other 
occupations,  was  very  significant  in  the  overall 
framework  of  work  opportunities  for  Boston 
women.  In  the  case  of  the  Boott  Mills,  as  Bond 
points  out  in  Chapter  5,  boardinghouse  keepers 
were  originally  recruited  from  the  local  middle 
class  in  an  effort  to  attract  "respectable"  widows, 
and,  as  a  result,  under  the  Lowell  system  the 
position  of  keeper  seemingly  carried  a  higher 
status  than  private  boardinghouse  keeping. 


Table  4-3.  Employment  distribution  for  women  in 
Massachusetts  in  1885. 


Occupational  Category 
Government  &  professional 
Domestic  &  personal 
Trade  &  transportation 
Agriculture  &  fisheries 
Manufacture  &  mechanical 
Apprentices  &  laborers 


# 

% 

15,561 

5.20 

149,971 

53.25 

11,980 

4.00 

411 

0.15 

111,654 

37.20 

526 

0.20 

Total  women  employed 


299,981        100.00 


Statewide  data  from  1885  (published  in  1889) 
show  a  slightly  different  pattern  from  that  of 
Boston.  The  major  occupational  categories  for 
women  are  shown  in  Table  4-3  (MBSL  1889:  582- 
585).  As  with  the  statistics  from  Boston,  the 
Domestic  and  Personal  category  can  be  further 
broken  down  (Table  4-4). 

For  the  state  as  a  whole,  personal  service  is 
once  again  composed  primarily  of  nurses  (3,132) 
and  laundry  workers  (2,576)  (the  other  major 
category  is  "Not  specified" — 3,669). 

By  expanding  the  view  of  women's  labor 
opportunities  to  the  statewide  level,  a  slightly 
different  image  of  the  importance  of 
boardinghouse  keeping  is  apparent. 
Employment  in  boardinghouses  on  a  statewide 
level  ranked  30  out  of  125  recorded  occupations 
for  women.  The  top  ten  jobs  for  Massachusetts 
women  in  1885  were  servants  (137,742),  cotton 
mill  operatives  (31,514),  boot  and  shoe 
manufactory  operatives  (14,390),  dressmakers 
(12,712),  teachers  (9,922),  woolen  mill  operatives 
(9,149),  bookkeepers  and  clerks  (5,784), 
housekeepers  (4,901),  saleswomen  (3,828),  and 
seamstresses  (3,728).  Taken  together,  these  ten 
occupations  accounted  for  almost  78%  of  the 
total     number     of     women     employed     in 


Domestic  Ideology  and  Boardinghouse  Economics    41 


Massachusetts.  The  difference  in  this  pattern 
from  that  seen  in  Boston  is  the  increased 
importance  of  manufacturing  jobs,  which  seems 
to  be  a  reflection  of  the  concentration  of 
industrial  manufactories  outside  of  the  city  of 
Boston  in  industrial  towns  such  as  Lowell,  Lynn, 
and  Holyoke.  In  this  sense,  the  information 
from  the  state  as  a  whole  probably  more 
accurately  reflects  the  Massachusetts  economy 
and  the  overall  structure  of  labor  opportunities 
for  Massachusetts  women.  Interestingly,  it  is  in 
the  manufacturing  towns  outside  of  Boston 
where  boarding  probably  played  the  largest  role 
in  the  overall  housing  market. 


Table  4—4.     Employment  in  domestic  and  personal 
service  for  Massachusetts  women  in  1885. 


Occupational   Category 
Boarding  and  Lodging 

Boardinghouse  employees 

Hotel  employees 

Restaurant  employees 

Not  specified 
Domestic  Service 

Housekeepers 

Servants  (in  families) 
Personal  Service 


# 
7,328 
1,387 
1,867 
1,528 
2,546 

132,855 
4,901 

127,954 
9788 


Total 


149,971 


The  establishment  of  this  framework,  albeit 
sketchy,  for  looking  at  boardinghouse  keeping 
within  a  context  of  women's  work  opportunities  is 
valuable  for  several  reasons.  For  one  thing,  it 
allows  an  examination  of  the  range  of  possible 
jobs  for  women  and  contributes  to  an 
understanding  of  the  major  types  of  jobs  women 
held.  More  important,  it  serves  to  point  out,  at 
least  in  a  general  sense,  the  widespread  nature 
of  boarding  as  an  institutionalized  living 
arrangement  that  offered  significant  potential 
for  employment.  With  this  in  mind,  it  is 
appropriate  to  focus  more  specifically  on  the 
economic  and  social  nature  of  boarding  from  the 
perspective  of  the  keeper  and  to  try  to  place 
boarding  more  clearly  within  the  context  of  19th- 
century  conceptions  of  the  appropriate  position 
of  women's  labor. 


The     Social     Vision      of     Boardinghouse 
Keeping 

The  prevalence  of  boarding  was  based  on  a 
wide  variety  of  factors  both  economic  and  social. 
In  Lowell,  as  elsewhere,  it  is  often  difficult  to 
separate  the  different  aspects.  The  corporations 
needed  to  guarantee  a  steady  and  cooperative 


labor  force  in  an  economic  sense,  but  this  was 
done,  in  part,  by  building  a  rhetoric  describing  a 
particular  type  of  social  environment.  It  is 
important  to  realize  that  for  the  early  industrial 
communities,  more  attention  and  debate  was 
focused  on  the  prospective  living  conditions  of 
the  new  employees  than  on  the  new  working 
environments.  "According  to  the  industrialists, 
factory  conditions  were  less  at  issue  than 
housing,  which  would  continue  to  have  an 
influence  over  the  workers'  families  after  they 
had  left  the  industrial  town"  (Wright  1981:  61). 
This  serves  to  point  out  just  how  crucial  domestic 
concerns  were  during  this  period,  and 
emphasizes  the  value  of  looking  at  industry 
through  workers'  housing.  While  a  great  deal 
more  could  be  said  about  the  economic  and 
social  implications  of  housing  from  the  industrial 
perspective  (i.e.,  as  part  of  a  larger  framework  of 
corporate  paternalism)  it  is  of  greater  value  to  try 
to  approach  this  subject  from  the  slightly 
different  perspective  of  the  people  who  were 
running  boardinghouscs  or  taking  in  boarders. 

As  was  stated  at  the  outset,  one  of  the  major 
changes  of  the  19th  century  was  the  increasing 
movement  of  a  variety  of  the  productive 
functions  out  of  the  household  and  into  the 
larger  economy,  and  the  concurrent  and 
increasing  notion  of  the  separation  of  "work" 
and  "home."  Boardinghouse  keeping  directly 
contradicts  this  idea  because  it  involved  the 
expansion  of  labor  within  the  household,  in 
effect  merging  home  and  work.  Any  attempt  to 
accomplish  an  understanding  of  boardinghouse 
keeping  must  attempt  to  address  this  apparent 
contradiction  between  the  domestic  ideal  of  the 
separation  of  spheres  and  the  reality  of  women's 
work  in  the  home  (Davidoff  1979:  64). 

An  excellent  example  of  the  interaction  of 
these  complex  themes  can  be  seen  in  the 
writings  of  Catherine  Beecher,  one  of  the  most 
significant  19th-century  authors  of  domestic 
literature.  Beecher's  work  is  of  particular 
interest  because  it  highlights  some  of  the  issues 
raised  about  19th-century  conceptions  of 
domestic  labor.  Throughout  her  work  Beecher 
supports  her  claims  with  "two  new  metaphors  of 
female  authority:  woman  as  'home  minister' 
and  as  skilled  'professional'"  (Hayden  1981:  56). 
Further,  Beecher  was  a  staunch  advocate  of  the 
separation  of  spheres  and  the  isolation  of  the 
female  within  the  home,  feeling  that  this  was 
where  women  could  have  their  greatest 
influence  on  American  society  (Sklar  1973:  153- 
156).  What  makes  all  of  this  so  interesting  is  that 
Beecher  picks  a  boardinghouse  keeper  as  an 
example  to  other  women  of  the  importance  of 
"professional"  housekeeping     and  the  proper 


42   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


manner  of  organizing  home  accounts  (Beecher 
1841:  177).  Implicit  in  this  is  the  acceptance  of 
boardinghouse  keeping  as  a  morally  legitimate 
activity  for  women  and  of  the  boardinghouse 
keeper  as  a  model  to  be  at  least  partially 
followed  by  other  women.  In  other  words, 
Beecher  apparently  saw  no  contradiction 
between  the  domestic  ideology  she  was  creating 
and  the  labor  of  women  as  boardinghouse 
keepers. 

What  this  suggests  is  that  boardinghouse 
keeping,  by  creating  employment  through  the 
expansion  of  the  household  duties  of  women,  did 
not  necessarily  contradict  the  expanding 
domestic  ideology  of  the  middle  class  and  was, 
in  fact,  more  acceptable  than  some  other  types 
of  occupations  for  women.  Boardinghouse 
keeping  represented,  in  a  certain  sense,  a 
chance  for  women  to  "make  money  and  not  lose 
social  class"  (Strasser  1982: 148).  It  was  a  "way  of 
supplementing  income  without  the  women  in 
the  household  having  to  work  in  public" 
(Davidoff  1979:  85).  In  part,  the  apparent  social 
acceptability  of  boardinghouse  keeping  was  also 
based  on  the  image  of  the  boardinghouse  as  a 
surrogate  family.  In  industrial  towns  such  as 
Lowell  "boardinghouse  keepers  were  regarded 
as  surrogate  parents  and  operatives  as  minor 
children"  (Dublin  1979:  79).  Although  this  was 
certainly  part  of  the  extension  of  the 
corporations'  control  of  workers  into  their  living 
environments,  it  was  also  a  description  of 
board inghouses  which  helped  to  alleviate  some 
of  society's  concerns  for  the  preservation  of 
family  morality. 

Boarding  ideally  functioned  as  a  surrogate  for  the 
family,  shielding  transient  individuals  from  the 
uprooting  forces  of  migration.  It  was  the  family's 
agent  in  the  city,  guiding  the  young  migrant  from 
home  to  marriage  while  keeping  the  ties  to  family 
and  community  intact.  In  large  cities  boarding  could 
meet  on  one  front  the  potential  moral  and  social 
problems  of  undisciplined  peer-group  life.  While 
the  reality  rarely  met  the  ideal,  a  belief  in 
boarding  persisted  insofar  as  it  promised  a  means  of 
insulating  young  men  and  women  from  the  perils  of 
urban  life  while  facilitating  the  migration  and 
discipline  necessary  for  American  urban-industrial 
development  (Peel  1°86:  813-814). 

These  notions  helped  to  justify  the  validity  of 
boardinghouse  life  by  drawing  on  societal 
concerns  over  the  stability  of  the  family  and  put 
the  boardinghouse  keeper  in  a  position  of 
recognized  importance. 

By  the  end  of  the  19th  century  the  acceptance 
of  a  level  of  respectability  for  boardinghouse  life 
began  to  fade,  especially  as  boarding  (where  the 
occupants  most  often  shared  meals  in  the 
house)  increasingly  gave  way  to  lodging  (where 
meals  were  taken  outside  the  house).    As  the 


progressive  reformers  became  more  and  more 
concerned  with  the  domestic  environment,  the 
societal  concerns  with  boarding  and  lodging 
became  more  pronounced.  Interestingly,  the 
surrogate  family  image  of  the  boardinghouse 
took  on  added  importance.  By  the  turn  of  the 
century,  reformers  were  making  an  "explicit 
distinction  between  the  family  life  of  the 
boardinghouse  and  the  lonely  self  absorption  of 
lodgers"  (Peel  1986:  813).  This  is  worth 
recognizing  because  it  shows  quite  clearly  the 
importance  of  the  notion  of  the  boardinghouse 
as  a  surrogate  family. 

Another  crucial  aspect  of  boardinghouse  life 
that  is  related  to  the  image  of  the  boardinghouse 
as  surrogate  family  is  the  extent  to  which 
boarders  shared  characteristics  with  each  other 
and  their  "surrogate  parents."  During  the  first 
several  decades  in  Lowell  there  was  a  significant 
amount  of  cultural  similarity  among  the 
boarders.  In  addition,  "kin  and  friendship 
networks  .  .  .  operated  throughout  the 
boardinghouse  system"  (Dublin  1979:  81). 
Though  the  socialization  aspects  of  this  system 
have  been  compared  to  other  boardinghouse 
situations  for  women  (Dublin  1979:  83),  it  is 
equally  as  valid  to  see  these  connections  as  part 
of  a  larger  pattern  of  regularity  in  boarding 
relations.  In  Lowell,  the  female  boarders  were  all 
coming  into  a  similar  situation  with,  to  a  certain 
extent,  relatively  clearly  defined  relations  to  the 
boardinghouse  keeper  in  his/her  role  as 
corporate  employee.  The  situation  was  slightly 
different  in  boarding  with  individual  families,  as 
there  was  more  potential  fluidity  in  relationships. 
By  looking  at  the  types  of  relationships  between 
people  involved  in  boarding  it  becomes  clear 
that  the  kin  and  friendship  networks  of  the 
women  in  the  Lowell  boardinghouses  are 
actually  reflective  of  a  larger  pattern  of 
organizing  boarding  arrangements  along  family, 
class,  occupational,  and  ethnic  lines.  Studies  of 
both  individual  families  taking  in  boarders  and 
commercial  boarding  and  lodging  houses  found 
significant  (admittedly  highly  complex  and 
dynamic)  correlations  between  the  boarders  and 
the  head  of  household  or  keeper  in  terms  of 
occupation,  status,  and  nationality  (Hareven  and 
Modell  1973:  473;  Peel  1986:  825-826).  Similarly, 
ethnic  background  has  been  suggested  as  a 
determining  factor  in  boardinghouse 
composition  during  the  latter  half  of  the  19th 
century  in  Lowell  as  immigrant  labor  began  to 
supplant  native  labor  (Bond  1987:  40-41). 


Domestic  Ideology  and  Boardinghouse  Economics    43 


Economic  Aspects  of  Boardinghouse 
Keeping 

Shifting  the  focus  somewhat,  it  is  appropriate 
to  try  to  approach  boarding  from  a  more  strictly 
economic  point  of  view.  Above  all  else,  boarding 
represented  an  economic  transaction  where  an 
individual  exchanged  cash  (or  perhaps  at  times 
some  type  of  service)  for  a  place  to  eat,  sleep, 
and  maybe  have  laundry  done.  While  the 
Lowell  boardinghouses  played  an  economic  role 
for  the  corporations,  it  is  harder  to  come  to  terms 
with  the  economic  situation  of  the 
boardinghouse  keepers.  Clearly,  the  primary 
concern  of  these  people  was  the  support  of 
themselves  and  their  dependents.  Although  it 
has  been  suggested  that  boardinghouse  keeping 
might  have  been  a  woman's  occupation  that  was 
accorded  slightly  higher  social  status  than  some 
other  jobs,  and  that  this  might  have  contributed 
to  its  attractiveness,  it  is  necessary  to  go  into 
greater  detail  about  the  economic 
characteristics  of  boarding  to  fully  understand  it. 

In  their  study  of  boarding  and  lodging  as  a 
phenomenon  of  the  family,  Hareven  and  Modell 
emphasized  the  economic  nature  of  the  decision 
of  a  family  to  take  in  boarders  and  focused  on  a 
number  of  different  motivations. 

Families  which  were  prepared  to  accept  lodgers:  1) 
were  able  to  receive  a  'brokerage  fee'  for  adapting 
the  primarily  large  dwelling  units  to  the  needs  of 
usually  single  immigrants,  usually  from  their  own 
social  level  and  a  similar  standard  of  living;  2) 
realized  income  for  work  performed  by  the  wife 
within  the  home...;  3)  benefited  by  a  gain  in 
[income]  flexibility...,  available  even  in  times  of 
sickness  or  unemployment;  4)  were  in  a  position  to 
stabilize  their  income  through  the  family  life 
cycle...;  5)  afforded  widows  and  single  women.. .an 
opportunity  to  maintain  their  own  households 
rather  than  live  with  kin  (Hareven  and  Modell 
1973:  473-474). 

These  economic  aspects  of  boarding  show  the 
potential  complexity  of  motivations  and  are 
worthy  of  further  attention.  Basically  these  five 
characteristics  can  be  generalized  to  three  major 
points:  the  ability  of  women  to  work  within  the 
home;  the  ability  to  maintain  the  house  and 
household  in  situations  where  it  could  not 
otherwise  be  afforded;  and  the  advantage  of 
income  stability  through  either  periodic  income 
shortfalls  or  life  cycle  transitions.  The  nature  of 
boarding  as  women's  work  within  the  home  has 
already  been  discussed,  with  the  exception  of 
one  major  feature.  Work  in  the  home  would 
have  been  particularly  attractive  to  women  with 
dependent  children.  "Taking  in  boarders 
offered  more  independence  than  most.. .home 
work,  and  it  was  in  many  places  the  only 
available  employment  for  women  who  wanted  to 


make  money  while  staying  at  home  to  care  for 
their  children"  (Strasser  1982:  154).  While  it  is 
not  clear  how  great  a  concern  this  was  of  the 
corporate  boardinghouse  keepers  in  Lowell,  it 
does  give  some  additional  insight  into  individual 
motivations. 

Of  greater  importance  were  the  more 
fundamentally  economic  concerns,  especially 
for  the  family. 

The  boarders  were  a  crucially  important  factor  in 
the  financial  plans  of  many  working  class 
households  for  they  paid  good  money — $2  per  week 
if  male,  $1.25  per  week  if  female.  The  wife,  who 
cooked  for  the  boarders  and  did  their  housekeeping 
(which  probably  included  laundry  services),  could 
bring  in  as  much  as  $24  per  month  by  caring  for 
three  male  boarders — very  likely  more  than  the 
rest  of  the  family  earned  at  the  mill  (Wallace 
1972:  66-67). 

While  this  clearly  shows  the  potential  economic 
advantage  to  the  family,  one  mistake  Wallace 
makes  must  be  pointed  out.  He  fails  to  grasp 
the  true  economic  value  of  taking  in  boarders. 
Unlike  bringing  home  money  from  a  job,  the 
money  taken  in  from  boarders  was  not  solely  for 
labor,  but  also  had  to  cover  the  additional 
expenses  of  maintaining  a  larger  household,  a 
factor  Wallace  seems  to  have  overlooked. 

One  interesting  aspect  of  taking  in  boarders  is 
that,  at  least  for  families  in  Manchester,  New 
Hampshire,  it  was  not  necessarily  a  substitute 
for  female  work  outside  of  the  household.  While 
taking  in  a  large  number  of  boarders  did 
constitute  such  a  substitution,  "wives  in  male 
headed  households  with  boarders  were  more 
likely  to  work  outside  the  home  than  wives  in 
households  without  boarders"  (Hareven  1982: 
210).  This  seems  to  suggest  that,  for  the 
individual  family,  taking  in  boarders  was  just  one 
part  of  an  overall  diversified  commitment  to 
income  maximization  on  the  part  of  the 
household.  This  particular  feature  of  boarding  is 
one  aspect  that  helps  to  draw  the  conceptual 
lines  between  family  boarding  and  the  large- 
scale  institutional  boarding  of  the  Lowell 
industrial  system.  Running  a  corporate 
boarding  house  was  a  full-time  job. 

One  particularly  valuable  focus  of  Hareven 
and  Modell's  work  that  is  applicable  to  Lowell  is 
the  discussion  of  the  process  of  bringing  in 
boarders  as  a  function  of  the  life  cycle  of  the 
household.  The  value  of  this  derives  from  the 
fact  that  it  helps  to  provide  a  way  of  examining 
the  pattern  of  who  was  running  the 
boardinghouses.  One  feature  of  the 
corporations'  rhetoric  was  the  claim  that 
boardinghouse  keeping  was  particularly  well 
suited  to  widows  and  women  with  no  other 
economic  alternatives,  though  it  is  clear  from  the 


44   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


demographic  information  that  these  were  not 
the  only  people  running  boardinghouses  (Center 
for  History  Now  1985:  96).  By  recognizing  the  life 
cycle  advantages  of  taking  in  boarders  it  is 
possible  to  see  either  single  women  or 
households  as  fitting  into  this  pattern.  For  older 
women  and  widows  in  particular,  however,  the 
ability  to  maintain  autonomy  was  largely  based 
on  the  ability  to  have  either  children  or  boarders 
augmenting  the  household  (Hareven  1982:  177). 
This  suggests  a  way  to  create  a  more 
comprehensive  framework  for  understanding 
the  bases  for  the  decisions  made  by  individuals 
and  households  who  took  in  boarders  or  ran 
boardinghouses. 


The  Lowell  Boardinghouse  System 

With  this  background  pointing  out  the 
similarities  of  the  Lowell  corporate 
boardinghouses  to  boarding  on  a  smaller  scale, 
it  is  appropriate  to  try  to  delineate  some  of  the 
unique  features  of  the  situation  in  Lowell.  The 
overriding  difference  of  the  situation  in  Lowell 
was  the  inextricable  association  of  the 
boardinghouses  with  the  corporations.  Both  the 
operatives  and  the  corporations  considered 
inexpensive  board  as  part  of  the  total  wage 
package.  One  example  that  clearly  shows  this 
fact  is  the  operatives'  strike  in  October,  1836,  in 
opposition  to  an  increase  in  the  board  rate, 
something  the  workers  felt  was  an  attack  on  their 
pay  (Dublin  1979:  86). 

The  close  ties  to  the  corporations  had  both 
some  advantages  and  disadvantages  for  the 
boardinghouse  keepers.  On  the  positive  side, 
the  boardinghouse  keepers  did  not  have  to 
invest  in  a  house  or  take  full  responsibility  for  its 
upkeep.  To  start  up  a  boardinghouse  the  keeper 
needed  only  enough  capital — although  this  was 
a  far  from  insubstantial  amount — to  furnish  the 
house  and  provide  for  initial  operating  expenses 
(in  addition  to  corporate  approval,  of  course). 
The  economic  constraints  of  this  type  could  have 
been  met  by  bulk  purchases  or  perhaps  by 
rental  of  furnishings  (Bond  1987:  40).  While 
some  upkeep  of  the  facility  was  undoubtedly 
required  of  the  keepers,  any  major  repairs  would 
likely  have  been  handled  by  the  corporations. 
As  one  mill  employee  pointed  out,  "The 
corporations  give  employment  to  nearly  200  men 
whose  only  duty  consists  in  repairing  and 
painting  the  tenements  and  boardinghouses" 
(MBSL  1882:  289). 

Perhaps  an  even  greater  advantage  derived 
from  the  ties  to  the  corporations  was  that  the 
keepers  had  a  powerful  structure  backing  up 
their  dealings  with  their  tenants.     In  a  private 


boardinghouse  a  keeper  could  conceivably  run 
into  difficulties  with  obstinate  or  obnoxious 
tenants.  A  rather  sad  example  of  this  was 
recorded  in  Manchester,  New  Hampshire, 
where  a  female  operative  described  the 
problems  her  mother  encountered  while 
running  a  private  boardinghouse. 

She  went  bankrupt  too.. .they  were  getting  too  much 
good  food  for  what  they  were  paying. ..strawberry 
shortcake  and  cream  pies!  She  was  giving  them  all 
her  profits.  The  cigar  makers  never  paid  the  full 
amount.  They  were  always  behind.  They'd  miss  a 
meal,  and  the  next  time  they'd  bring  a  friend  to 
take  the  place  of  that  meal.  That's  how  cheap 
they  were.  She  lost  (Hareven  1982:  210-211). 

While  some  of  the  problems  this  woman  had 
seem  to  have  stemmed  from  her  own 
mismanagement,  she  also  seems  to  have  had 
constant  problems  collecting  her  boarders' 
money,  which  ultimately  helped  drive  her  out  of 
business.  One  advantage  for  the  boardinghouse 
keepers  in  Lowell  that  must  be  recognized  is  the 
power  of  the  corporations  (whether  implicit  or 
explicit)  in  maintaining  order  among  the 
tenants.  Further,  the  corporate  boardinghouse 
keepers  in  Lowell  never  had  to  worry  about 
collecting  board  fees  because  it  was  taken  out  of 
operatives'  pay  before  they  ever  received  it. 

On  the  other  side  of  this  same  issue,  there 
were  also  disadvantages  inherent  in  working  for 
the  corporations.  The  fact  that  the 
boardinghouses  were  owned  by  the  companies 
meant  that  a  keeper  who,  for  whatever  reason, 
wanted  to  quit,  was  not  just  leaving  a  job,  but  also 
a  house.  This  provides  an  interesting  parallel  to 
the  workers,  who  were  often  in  the  same 
situation.  Additionally,  keepers  had  specific 
responsibilities  in  terms  of  the  enforcement  of 
corporate  policy,  such  as  evening  curfews  and 
abstinence  in  the  boardinghouses  (Dublin  1979: 
78).  Perhaps  the  greatest  disadvantage, 
however,  was  that  there  seems  to  have  been  a 
clear  decrease  in  the  profitability  of  running 
corporate  boardinghouses  during  the  course  of 
the  19th  century,  leaving  the  keepers  in  an 
increasingly  tenuous  situation  (Center  for 
History  Now  1985:  125).  This  ultimately  led  to 
some  changes  in  the  system,  such  as  opening 
meals  to  outsiders  and  control  of  more  than  one 
unit  by  a  single  keeper.  Nonetheless,  in  a  period 
of  declining  profitability  the  boardinghouse 
keepers  were  not  really  able  to  adapt  to  the 
market  on  their  own,  but  were  constrained  by  the 
policy  decisions  of  the  corporations. 

It  is  possible  to  be  even  more  specific  about 
certain  aspects  of  the  economic  structure  of  the 
boardinghouses.  The  boardinghouse  keepers 
were  involved  in  two-way  economic  relationships 
with  the  corporations,  the  boarders,  and  other 


Domestic  Ideology  and  Boardinghouse  Economics    45 


individuals  and  businesses  in  the  community. 
While  it  is  often  difficult  to  understand  the 
complex  patterns  of  these  relationships,  several 
points  do  appear.  To  start  with  the  corporations, 
the  boardinghouse  keepers  were  employees  of 
the  corporation  whose  work  augmented  the 
wages  of  the  operatives  by  providing  inexpensive 
room  and  board.  They  also  acted  as  an 
intermediary  between  the  corporation  and  the 
workers  within  the  predominant  living 
environment.  While  the  duties  of  these  people 
in  terms  of  enforcing  company  policy  and 
creating  a  "moral"  living  environment  have 
been  partially  delineated,  the  actual  economic 
relationship  to  the  corporation  has  been 
neglected.  Trying  to  gain  a  better  understanding 
of  these  issues  helps  to  create  a  fuller  picture  of 
the  boardinghouse  system.  Throughout  this 
discussion  it  must  be  realized  that  the 
generalized  patterns  being  described 
undoubtedly  had  variations  and  exceptions. 


Relationships  with  the  Corporations 

The  corporations  hired  the  boardinghouse 
keepers,  set  the  board  rate  they  would  receive, 
and  established  policies  on  the  services  they 
would  provide.  One  policy  of  the  company  was 
different  board  rates  for  males  and  females.  For 
example,  corporate  board  rates  in  Lowell  in  1881 
were  $1.85  per  week  for  females  and  $2.90  per 
week  for  males.  Men  were  consistently  charged 
more,  presumably  with  the  expectation  that  they 
would  eat  more  food.  What  makes  this  so 
interesting,  however,  is  that  even  assuming  a 
difference  in  the  amount  of  food  consumed, 
women  seem  to  have  been  undercharged  for 
board.  This  is  clearly  seen  in  a  report  on 
boarding  services  in  Lawrence: 

There  is  no  reason  why  men  should  pay  so  much 
more  for  board  than  women,  and  the  rates  should  be 
equalized;  for  it  is  the  general  testimony  of  the 
boarding-house  keepers  that  they  would  as  soon 
keep  men  for  the  same  price,  but  have  to  charge  men 
more  to  help  pay  for  the  girls  (MBSL  1875:  419). 

It  seems  likely  that  this  was,  in  part,  an  attempt 
by  the  corporations  to  attract  female  operatives 
to  the  boardinghouses.  In  the  situation 
described  above,  the  artificially  low  rate  for 
women  was  made  up  by  overcharging  the  male 
boarders.  This  is  only  part  of  the  story,  however, 
because  it  appears  as  if  the  corporations 
sometimes  made  it  a  policy  to  preferentially 
supplement  the  board  of  female  employees  by 
making  payments  to  the  keepers.  In  Lawrence 
in  1874,  the  rate  was  $1  per  month  per  person, 
and  in  Lowell  in  1881,  the  rate  was  $0.05  for  each 
day  the  woman  worked  in  the  mill  (MBSL  1875: 


419,  1882:  295-296).  Even  by  the  1870s  and  1880s, 
when  immigrant  family  labor  had  largely 
supplanted  single  female  labor  the  corporations 
still  maintained  policies  that  were  preferential 
towards  female  operatives. 

It  would  be  inaccurate  to  imply  that  only 
female  boarders  were  given  artificially  lowered 
board  rates.  Since  the  corporations  wanted 
inexpensive  board  at  their  houses,  they  had  to 
support  the  keepers  in  some  manner,  a  fact  that 
was  not  lost  on  the  operatives.  One  Lowell 
operative  explained: 

They  [the  corporations]  pay  their  help  well,  and 
reduce  their  boarding  expenses  by  assuming  a 
portion  of  it  themselves.  All  the  mills  pay  their 
boarding  house  keepers  a  certain  sum  to  aid  in 
maintaining  the  excellence  of  the  table,  and  reduce 
the  workingman's  expenses  (MBSL  1882:  288). 

This  seems  initially  to  have  taken  the  form  of 
direct  payment  by  the  corporation  to  the  keeper 
of  a  certain  sum  per  person  over  and  above  the 
set  board  rate  (Center  for  History  Now  1985: 126). 
As  the  boardinghouse  system  changed  during 
the  19th  century,  the  manner  of  supplementing 
the  boardinghouses  seems  to  have  changed  as 
well.   An  "old"  operative  described  the  changes: 

The  keeper. ..[used  to]  receive  twenty-five  cents  per 
head  for  each  boarder.  But  finally  the 
dissatisfaction. ..became  so  great,  owing  to  the  fact 
that  those  who  could  not  find  accomodation  in  the 
corporation  houses  were  compelled.. .to  pay  a 
higher  rate  of  board,  that  the  corporations  then 
leased  them  to  the  keepers  for  merely  nominal  rent, 
and  gave  them  fuel  and  light,  and  the  operatives 
were  charged  a  rate  from  eight  to  ten  dollars  a 
month:  on  this  plan  the  houses  are  now  run  (MBSL 
1882:  288). 

Though  the  changes  that  took  place  in  the 
boardinghouse  system  were  complex  and 
related  to  a  number  of  issues,  several  things  are 
clear  from  this  commentary.  In  this  instance  it 
appears  as  if  a  preliminary  step  in  the  corporate 
divestiture  of  the  boardinghouses  was  a  process 
of  relaxing  control  of  the  facilities  and  putting 
them  more  clearly  under  control  of  the 
boardinghouse  keepers,  who  rented  the  houses 
from  the  corporation  and  charged  a  more 
market-oriented  rate  of  board.  Nevertheless, 
subsidy  of  these  facilities  still  took  place,  though 
less  directly,  with  the  corporate  supply  of  fuel 
and  light,  and  the  collection  of  only  nominal 
rents  from  the  keepers.  The  practice  of 
corporate  subsidy  of  the  boardinghouses  was 
only  a  small  part  of  the  total  economic  relation 
between  the  company  and  its  keepers,  but  an 
understanding  of  these  practices  helps  to 
address  an  important  aspect  of  the  corporate 
relationship  with  its  employees. 


46   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Services  to  the  Boarders 

The  services  provided  within  the 
boardinghouses  is  another  topic  that  has  not 
received  adequate  attention.  Little  mention  is 
made  of  the  day-to-day  provision  of  food, 
laundry,  and  lodging  services,  the  inherent 
purpose  of  the  boardinghouses.  Attempting  to 
delineate  more  clearly  some  of  the  structure  of 
these  services  can  add  a  great  deal  of  insight 
into  the  physical  conditions  of  life  in  the 
boardinghouses.  A  fascinating  example  that 
serves  to  point  out  just  how  much  variation 
existed  in  the  quality  of  services  provided  to 
boarders  is  a  description  of  a  special 
boardinghouse  run  by  the  Merrimack 
Corporation. 

The  design  was  to  supply,  at  an  advanced  price, 
better  rooms,  and  better  food  and  attendance,  and 
see  if  the  operatives  would  pay  the  increased  price. 
The  house  was  filled  without  trouble  and  when 
visited,  some  fifty  names  were  recorded  of  parties 
who  wished  a  room  as  soon  as  there  was  a  vacancy. 
The  price  for  men  is  $3.50,  for  women  $2.90,  and 
includes  room,  food,  washing,  and  attendance,  and 
the  use  of  a  bath-room,  there  being  one  of  the  latter 
on  each  floor  (MBSL  1882:  295). 

For  purposes  of  comparison,  the  weekly  board 
rate  in  this  house  can  be  compared  with  rates  of 
$2.90  for  men,  and  $1.85  for  women,  which  were 
the  general  corporate  rates  in  Lowell  at  that  time 
(MBSL  1882:  292).  What  is  so  worthwhile  about 
this  account  is  that  it  highlights  the  fact  that 
boarding  in  Lowell  was  not  just  a  question  of 
finding  a  place  to  live,  but  was  very  much  a 
situation  of  paying  for  services  and  amenities 
whose  price  and  quality  could  vary.  This  adds 
some  depth  to  the  understanding  of  the 
boardinghouse  system.  Further,  it  provides  a 
starting  place  for  looking  at  the  various  services 
provided  in  the  boardinghouses. 

The  best  and  most  expensive  boarding 
situation  provided  a  room,  food,  laundry, 
attendance,  and  had  an  indoor  bathroom  on 
each  floor.  Of  all  of  these,  only  the  last  two  were 
features  that  do  not  seem  to  have  been  at  all 
available  in  regular  corporation  boardinghouses 
at  the  same  time.  Indoor  plumbing  and 
increased  attendance  were  very  likely  amenities 
that  helped  to  fill  the  waiting  list  for  this 
boardinghouse.  The  other  services  are  harder  to 
judge  because  the  difference  from  other 
boardinghouses  are  solely  qualitative,  as  all  the 
boardinghouses  provided  rooms,  and  most 
provided  food  service  and  laundry.  Even 
attendance  can  be  thought  of  as  something  of  a 
qualitative  difference,  as  boardinghouse  keepers 
were  expected  to  provide  a  certain  amount  of 
individual  room  cleaning  for  the  boarders 
(MBSL  1882:  292).      Laundry  service,  however, 


does  seem  to  have  varied  among  houses.  In 
some  cases,  description  of  laundry  service 
referred  to  "usual  washing"  or  "ordinary 
washing"  (MBSL  1882:  292,  1875:  420).  This 
refers,  in  all  likelihood,  to  the  washing  of  work 
clothes  and  bed  linens,  with  the  washing  of  dress 
or  other  clothes  left  up  to  the  boarder.  In  some 
rare  instances  it  seems  that  laundry  was  not 
included  in  the  board.  At  the  Pemberton 
boardinghouses  in  Lawrence  women  generally 
did  their  own  wash,  even  though  their  board  rate 
does  not  seem  to  have  been  lower  (MBSL  1875: 
420).  Even  with  this  very  short  discussion  it  is 
clear  that  the  boardinghouses  in  Lowell  provided 
a  potentially  multifaceted  range  of  services. 
Qualitative  and  quantitative  variations  in  the 
services  available  to  boarders  made  a 
boardinghouse  more  than  just  a  place  to  sleep. 
An  examination  of  the  boardinghouse  services 
must  be  considered  as  part  of  any  attempt  to 
delineate  the  features  of  the  boardinghouse 
system  in  Lowell. 


Conclusions 

The  19th  century  was  a  period  of  rapid  change 
as  urbanization  and  industrialization 
contributed  to  changes  in  the  nature  and 
perception  of  work  and  home.  Boarding  was  one 
type  of  living  arrangement  that  expanded 
greatly  during  this  period  and  was  important  not 
just  as  a  living  arrangement,  but  also  as  a  source 
of  employment  for  women,  especially  in  the 
larger  urban  areas  and  growing  industrial  towns. 
One  of  the  most  interesting  aspects  of 
boardinghouse  keeping  is  how  it  fit  into 
changing  conceptions  of  work  and  home  and  the 
middle  class  conceptions  of  appropriate  work  for 
women.  In  a  certain  way,  running  a 
boardinghouse  was  socially  acceptable  work  for 
women  because  it  was  an  expansion  of  women's 
work  in  the  home.  Societal  concerns  were  also 
mediated  through  the  portrayal  of 
boardinghouse  keepers  as  surrogate  parents  for 
the  boarders. 

The  massive  institutionalized  boardinghouses 
of  the  Lowell  system  represent  one  extreme  of 
the  range  of  possible  types  of  boarding 
situations.  The  boardinghouse  keepers  in  Lowell 
were  involved  in  an  economic  situation  with  both 
explicitly  and  implicitly  defined  relationships  to 
the  corporations  and  their  tenants.  The  patterns 
these  relationships  took  were  influenced  by  a 
variety  of  different  factors,  including  the  publicly 
stated  policies  of  the  corporations  about  the 
living  arrangements  they  provided  for  their 
employees.  To  look  at  this  system  only  in  this 
manner,    however,    ignores    the    individual 


Domestic  Ideology  and  Boardinghouse  Economics    47 


decision-making  processes  of  the 
boardinghouse  keepers.  The  decisions  they 
made  are  clearly  related  to  social  and  economic 
factors  that  influenced  not  only  them,  but  the 
individual  households  taking  in  boarders  as  well. 
Ultimately,  the  similarities  in  the  situation  to 
which  these  people  were  responding  were 
related  to  a  broader  framework  of  urban  and 
industrial  expansion  that  was  putting  strains  on 
the  household  and  causing  changes  in  people's 
living  and  working  environments. 


48   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Chapter  5 

ARCHEOLOGY  IN  THE  BACKLOTS  OF  BOOTT  UNITS  45  AND  48: 
HOUSEHOLD  ARCHEOLOGY  WITH  A  DIFFERENCE 

by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski 


Introduction 

The  Archeology  of  Urban  Lots 

One  of  the  joys  of  archeological  research 
occurs  in  those  moments  when  thought  can  be 
given  to  the  nature  of  a  place  like  the  rear  yard 
of  a  19th-century  company  boardinghouse,  a 
place  where  a  hot  summer  evening  might  be 
spent  washing  cloths  or  peeling  potatoes  or 
smoking  a  pipe — passing  time  with  countless 
stories.  It  was  in  places  like  this  that  the 
domestic  side  of  the  Industrial  Revolution  was 
played  out,  away  from  the  noise  and  clatter  of 
the  mills  and  factories.  Perhaps  here,  workers, 
having  finished  their  day's  labor,  might  find  time 
to  relax  after  their  evening  meal  to  talk  with 
people  from  different  parts  of  New  England — or 
different  parts  of  the  world,  for  that  matter. 
Small  though  they  were,  the  boardinghouse 
yards  were  important  places. 

There  is  a  certain  quality  that  the 
boardinghouse  backlots  of  Lowell  share  with 
similar  spaces  in  other  cities,  in  other  times  and 
in  other  places.  It  is  the  intensity  of  use  that  is  so 
characteristic  of  urban  areas  that  links  the  yards 
of  19th-century  Lowell  with  the  tenement  yards 
of  cities  in  Great  Britain — e.g.,  19th-century 
Manchester,  or  12th-century  Dublin, 
Southhampton,  or  Durham.  In  spite  of  the 
differences  that  separate  the  urban  industrial 
centers  of  the  19th  century  and  the  preindustrial 
cities  of  the  preceding  millennia,  they  share 
curiously  similar  archeological  records. 

This  stems  in  large  part  from  the  conditions 
that  are  endemic  to  urban  areas,  where  space  is 
limited  and  communities  characterized  by  high 
population  density.  What  open  space  there  is  is 
utilized  for  work,  gardening,  keeping  livestock, 
and  for  leisure  (Braudel  1981:  495  ;  Biddle  1976; 
Macphail  1981;  Hohenberg  and  Lees  1985; 
Pendery  1978;  Mrozowski  1987b).  It  is,  in  fact, 
this  intensive  land  use  that  some  archeologists 
have  pinpointed  as  the  characteristic  that  best 
defines  what  separates  urban  from  non-urban 
communities  (e.g.,  Staski  1987).  The  reliance 
upon  yard  space  as  work  space  continues  today 
in  many  parts  of  the  world.  In  many  Asian 
countries,  for  example,  urban  areas  contain 
fairly  substantial  tracts  of  land  devoted  to  food 
production    (Douglas    1983).       Even    in    the 


industrialized  nations  of  the  west,  urban  gardens 
dot  the  landscape  of  many  major  cities. 

There  are,  of  course,  differences  in  the  ways 
urban  space  is  used  in  the  west  today  and  the 
ways  it  was  utilized  just  a  century  ago.  In  this 
instance,  however,  we  are  dealing  with  a  question 
of  degree,  not  absolutes.  Today's  use  of  urban 
yard  space  for  recreation  or  gardening  is 
qualitatively  different  than  the  type  of  intensive 
use  similar  space  received  in  preindustrial  cities. 
One  major  dissimilarity  surrounds  the  use  of 
yard  space  as  a  primary  disposal  area  for  human 
waste  and  other  refuse.  In  fact,  one  of  the  more 
interesting  aspects  of  the  archeology  of  Lowell  is 
that  it  captures  that  period  of  major  transition  in 
the  history  of  cities  when  responsibility  for  water 
and  waste  management  shifted  from  the 
individual  to  corporate  or  municipal  entities. 
Considering  how  ubiquitous  waste  and  water 
management  facilities  were  in  preindustrial 
cities  (e.g.,  Carver  1987;  Hall  and  Ken  ward  1982; 
Beaudry  1986),  the  importance  of  the  shift 
should  not  be  overlooked  (cf.  Honerkamp  and 
Council  1984).  And,  as  our  previous  research  in 
Lowell  has  demonstrated,  there  are  other 
changes  in  the  way  yard  space  was  utilized  that 
appear  to  have  accompanied  the  transformation 
of  urban  society  during  the  second  half  of  the 
19th  century  (Beaudry  and  Mrozowski  1987b). 

There  are  additional  qualities  that 
characterize  the  archeological  record  of  urban 
communities.  One  of  the  most  important  is  that 
urban  deposits  are  often  the  direct  result  of 
short-term  events  (Schofield  1987;  Beaudry  1987; 
Beaudry  and  Mrozowski  1987b;  Mrozowski  1984; 
Praetzellis,  Praetzellis,  and  Brown  1980).  In 
many  instances  these  events  are  associated  with 
periods  of  domestic  transition,  when  one 
household  replaces  another,  for  example  (cf. 
Moran,  Zimmer,  and  Yentsch  1982;  Mrozowski 
1984;  Beaudry  and  Mrozowski  1987).  In  other 
cases  they  can  stem  from  community-wide 
events  such  as  plagues,  fires,  or  the  introduction 
of  new  domestic  technologies.  So,  while  the 
archeological  record  includes  deposits  resulting 
from  the  long-term  accumulation  of  refuse,  that 
record  is  often  punctuated  by  the  residues  of 
rapidly  occurring  events. 

The  role  of  human  agency  in  shaping  the 
archeological  record  of  urban  communities  is 


49 


50   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


paramount,  but  it  is  not  total.  The  non-human 
members  of  the  urban  environment  are  also 
active  participants  in  the  formation  of 
archeological  deposits.  This  is  one  of  the 
reasons  we  have  employed  an  interdisciplinary 
approach  to  the  study  of  Lowell's  urban  lots. 
Beyond  what  palynology  can  say  about  plant 
communities,  it  is  also  one  of  the  most  important 
tools  the  archeologist  has  to  examine 
archeological  formation  processes.  Another 
example  is  faunal  analysis.  The  analysis  of 
animal  remains  should  justifiably  focus  on  the 
issue  of  foodways  at  the  boardinghouses,  but  it 
should  not  ignore  the  remains  of  other  species. 
The  presence  of  rodent  skeletal  material  and 
rodent-gnawed  bone  of  other  species  furnishes 
important  evidence  concerning  the  character  of 
the  urban  environment  and  the  conditions  that 
obtained  in  the  boardinghouses  themselves 
(Mrozowski  et  al.  1989).  These  are  but  two 
examples  of  how  the  cross-fertilization  of 
different  analytical  techniques  can  serve  to 
illuminate  the  intricacies  of  the  archeological 
record  of  an  industrial  city  like  Lowell. 


Urban   Lots   as   Micro-environments 

Besides  the  analytical  rigor  an 
interdisciplinary  approach  can  bring  to  urban 
archeology,  it  also  fosters  an  appreciation  for  the 
social  and  ecological  complexity  of  the  urban 
environment.  Students  of  the  city  have  always 
recognized  the  social  and  spatial  dimensions  of 
urban  communities,  but  have  had  less  affinity 
for  studying  the  city  as  an  ecosystem  except  as  a 
metaphor  (e.g.,  Park  [1916]  and  Wirth  [1938] 
reprinted  in  Sennett  1969;  cf.  Douglas  1983). 
Cities  are  in  fact  complex  ecosystems  which  are 
the  product  of  human  action  and  human  values. 
As  such  they  are  the  material  embodiment  of 
human  values.  At  the  same  time  our  methods 
alert  us  to  the  distinction  drawn  by  Schiffer  (1972, 
1983,  1988)  concerning  the  effects  of  both 
cultural  and  natural  forces  on  the  formation  of 
the  archeological  record  (cf.  Dincauze  1987). 
Only  by  looking  at  the  urban  lots  of  Lowell ,  or  for 
that  matter  any  city,  r.s  the  product  of  social  and 
ecological  forces  can  we  hope  to  forge  a  link 
between  the  archeological  record  and  human 
behavior. 


Use    of    Backlots    and    Formation     of    the 
Archeological    Record 

We  have  several  lines  of  evidence  to  pursue  in 
arriving  at  expectations  of  what  the 
archeological  record  of  backlots  such  as  those  of 
the  Boott  boardinghouses  ought  to  be;  the  same 


lines  of  evidence  assist  in  interpreting  what  is 
found.  Perhaps  the  most  compelling  record  is 
photographic.  Progressive  reformers  and  others 
made  use  of  photography  to  underscore  writings 
about  the  conditions  of  workers'  housing  in  late 
19th-  and  early  20th-century  industrial 
communities.  Margaret  Byington's  classic 
study,  Homestead:  The  Households  of  a  Mill 
Town  (1910),  is  illustrated  with  photographs 
taken  by  Lewis  Hine,  who  specialized  in 
capturing  the  lives  of  working  people  on  film. 
Two  of  the  Homestead,  Pennsylvania,  scenes  are 
especially  poignant  reminders  that,  despite  their 
necessary  function  as  centers  of  a  wide  variety  of 
domestic  chores  and  even  of  leisure  activities, 
boardinghouse  backlots  could  be  far  from 
pleasant  places. 

Figure  5-1  shows  what  was  meant  to  be  a 
typical  wash  day  at  a  boardinghouse.  A  woman 
scrubs  clothes  on  a  washboard  in  a  large  wooden 
tub  set  atop  a  smaller  tub.  Dirty  laundry  lies 
scattered  on  the  ground,  which  has  an  ersatz 
paving  of  planks  and  miscellaneous  boards. 
Litter  has  accumulated  against  the  back  of  the 
building,  beneath  a  crude  wooden  bench,  and 
along  the  fence  line  of  the  narrow  passage 
leading  from  the  street  into  the  backlot.  Two 
children  sit  quietly  on  the  steps,  cowed,  no  doubt, 
by  the  presence  of  the  photographer. 

Figure  5-2  shows  the  back  stoop  and  a  portion 
of  the  rear  yard  of  another  Homestead 
boardinghouse.  Here,  again,  boards  cover  areas 
prone  to  traffic,  and  litter  has  accumulated  in 
almost  every  open  spot.  A  tired-looking  woman 
eats  a  piece  of  fruit,  and  a  child  gazes  solemnly 
at  the  photographer.  The  scene  is  squalid,  yet  at 
the  window  of  the  lower  apartment  there  are  lace 
curtains  and  a  flowcrbox — and  the  woman,  with 
dignity  and  beauty  despite  her  surroundings, 
wears  a  flower  in  her  hair. 

John  Coolidge,  author  of  Mill  and  Mansion 
(1942),  photographed  backlots  of  New  England 
mill  housing  in  the  late  'teens  and  early  '20s. 
Most  of  these  photographs  have  not  been 
published,  however,  but  the  negatives  are  in  the 
archives  of  the  Museum  of  American  Textile 
History  in  North  Andover,  Massachusetts.  In 
Figures  5-3,  5-4,  and  5-5  we  have  a  sequence  of 
backlot  scenes,  the  latter  two  of  the  same  scene 
several  years  apart.  All  are  of  workers'  housing 
in  Somersworth,  New  Hampshire.  Figure  5-3 
shows  a  row  of  detached  wooden  housing, 
possibly  tenement  duplexes.  Each  free-standing 
house  has  two  backlots  fenced  with  a  fairly  open 
and  insubstantial  post,  pale,  and  rail  picket 
fence  (none  recently  painted);  every  lot  has  an 
umbrella-type  carousel  clothesline  mounted  on 
a    single    post    set    into    the    ground.       Each 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    51 


c 

a 

> 

>N 

</> 

C 

c 

o 

Cu 

TJ 

<u 

o 

CI 

o 

E 

r— * 

o 

ON 

X 

c 

n 

o 

c 

bb 

c 

>, 

rj 

"5s 

•a 

CO 

10 

e 

« 

s 

o 

o 

"8 

x; 

u 

a. 

3 

w 

XI 

O 

o 

a. 

o 

X. 

a. 

o 

a; 

4J 

c 

o 

X 

2 

I/) 

« 

Xi 

a; 

j 

3 

O 

,_4 

jC 

i 

bo 

in 

c 

01 

C,   T> 

3 

»- 

bp 

O 

iH  x> 

52    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  5-2.    Lewis  Hine  photograph  of  a  Homestead,  Pennsylvania,  boardinghouse 
backlot.   (Reproduced  from  Byington  1910). 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    53 


a; 
2 


& 


o  w 
12  5 

0)   ^ 

KJ 

.si 

60  ~ 

"o  60 
</>  .5 
°"E 
u  o 

<Tj    X> 

X    o 

CL,  O 
nj  > 
>-    > 

£? 

■81 

o0    i 

-a  <u 
•2  « 
o  >h 

M     « 

I"5 

.    ai 

^•S 

<"  a. 
6 


XL 
o 

V) 

OJ 

E 
o 

(A 

O 

o 
u 

60 
>, 

•a 
<u 

w 


PS    o 

05 


</> 


III 


5> 


•3.2 

^  \s 
(0  X 
60  0) 

x  H 

■c  c 
•*    u 

C     4) 

c  o 

(0  •** 
•£     in 

•r    a; 

u  O 
<o  (J 


54   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


°    2 
o-  o 

5.  § 


3 

5 


pi 

3 

n> 

g 

(D     — 

s  § 


2  "" 

3  ^ 

n 

o 
o 


O     (/) 

c  o 


w 
n> 

8  o 

o  3 


rt>    sr  o 

e 


P   c 
3  5 


n>    a' 


> 

a. 


S. 


(t    O    K 


3" 
o 
C 

V) 


O  v< 

*■"  o 


ST   3 
TO  CN 

EJ 

3 

[i- 


g 


o 

3" 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    55 


rv  C 


(3  "K 


^§ 


£^y 


«   >    oi 


~  .2   3 

2    J!    c 

bo  o 


01 


0)     "2 

in 


5    C 


60 

3 


(M     *    13 
^     bO  0) 
3     C 


o 

S> 

c 


-     ui     J; 

">  ■*  £ 
s  u  ts 


-  s  g  x 
•S-g  S's 

■"     O     n   H 

£o  .§ 

53    ^    tt) 

S   <u   2 

C 
o 


0) 

H 

.    6 

01    o 


6  < 

3 


c  o 

«  £ 

8  5 

c  12 
o 


.— »     TO     >;    y-« 


56    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


clothesline  has  a  wedge-shaped  apron  raised 
above  the  ground,  serving  as  a  platform  to  stand 
on  while  hanging  clothes.  It  is  interesting  to  note 
gardens  and  even  fruit  trees  in  some  of  these 
lots,  along  with  board-lined  walkways  and 
ubiquitous  weedy  growth  along  fence  lines  and 
untrafficked  areas. 

Figures  5-4  and  5-5  show  the  same  seen  a  few 
years  apart.  Here  brick  boardinghouse  blocks 
have  open,  unfenced  yards,  but  the  territory 
allotted  to  each  unit  is  indicated  in  part  by  the 
regular  placement  of  clotheslines.  In  the 
foreground  is  a  pen  of  some  sort,  an  enclosure 
for  a  pig,  perhaps  (it  would  do  little  to  keep 
chickens  or  dogs  in  place — Figure  5-4  shows  a 
dog  tied  to  the  pen).  Litter  has  accumulated 
against  the  buildings  and  outbuildings  as  well  as 
along  the  perimeter  of  the  enclosure.  Such 
locations  tend  also  to  have  weedy  growth;  this  is 
especially  obvious  in  Figure  5-5.  In  the  later 
scene,  a  series  of  crocks  and  tubs  with  various  ill- 
fitting  coverings  are  lined  up  along  the  fence  of 
the  pen;  these  presumably  served  in  some  food 
or  water  storage  capacity.  The  later  scene  also 
shows  more  broadcast  litter. 

The  photographic  evidence  corroborates  what 
we  would  expect:  boardinghouse  backlots  were 
intensively  used,  utilitarian  space.  They  served  a 
wide  variety  of  functions;  they  were  seldom 
attractive,  lacking  in  upkeep,  and  most  often 
muddy  traps  for  lost  and  discarded  items.  They 
nevertheless  served  social  functions,  as  women 
gathered  to  gossip  (cf.  the  background  of  Figure 
5-4)  and  children  played  near  where  their 
mothers  worked.  Hence  if  women  spent  a  great 
deal  of  time  doing  chores  in  the  backlots, 
children  probably  spent  considerable  time  there 
as  well.  Time  spent  by  men  in  the  backlots  was 
far  more  likely  to  be  leisure  time — drinking  and 
card  playing,  perhaps — but  might  also  have 
included  gardening,  some  animal  tending,  and, 
in  this  century,  tinkering  with  automobiles.  The 
importance  of  calling  to  mind  the  range  of 
activities  that  may  have  taken  place  in  these 
small  spaces  is  to  link  the  behaviors  responsible 
for  the  formation  of  the  archeological  record 
with  the  various  sorts  of  data  recovered  from  the 
backlots;  it  is  too  easy  to  lose  sight  of  the  human 
dimension  of  people's  day-to-day  lives  when 
considering  such  abstract  topics  as 
'socioeconomic  status'  or  'minimum  number  of 
vessels.'  Our  aim  is  to  link  the  data  with 
behaviors  responsible  for  formation  of  the 
archeological  record;  a  site  structure  approach 
permits  us  to  interpret  the  archeological  record 
with  a  focus  on  the  people  who  helped  to  create 
it. 


Boardinghouse   Archeology 

Quite  a  few  historical  archeologists  have 
excavated  at  urban  boardinghouse  sites  in 
North  America,  but  the  literature  on  such  sites 
remains  ephemeral.  For  the  most  part,  the 
analytical  approach  to  such  sites  has  not  differed 
from  that  applied  to  other  types  of  domestic 
sites.  This  has  involved  attention  to  materials, 
ceramics  for  the  most  part,  excavated  from 
sealed  features  in  the  backlots  of  former 
boardinghouses;  the  focus  has  been  largely  on 
evaluating  the  socioeconomic  status  and /or 
ethnic  affiliation  of  residents  of  such  structures. 

DeCunzo's  (1982,  1987)  excavations  of 
tenements  and  boardinghouses  in  Patterson, 
New  Jersey,  involved  exhaustive  documentary 
research  to  establish  the  demographic  and 
ethnic  make-up  of  the  neighborhood  in  which 
her  site  was  located.  The  analysis  of  artifacts 
from  privies  behind  residences  occupied  by 
different  ethnic  groups  did  not  reveal  ethnic 
differentiation  in  ceramic  purchase  and  use;  De 
Cunzo  attributes  this  to  the  nature  of  the 
material — ceramics  were  mass-produced,  mass- 
marketed,  and  relatively  affordable  to  all.  They 
do  not  appear  to  have  served  as  ethnic  markers, 
and  their  affordability  means  they  do  not  in  and 
of  themselves  reflect  socioeconomic  standing  of 
consumers.  Further,  these  issues  become  very 
blurred  in  situations  of  mixed  and  multiple 
residence  at  the  same  site,  especially  in  places 
such  as  boardinghouses.  These  were  not  only 
home  to  many  (families  and  otherwise),  they 
were  often  subject  to  high  rates  of  transience. 
Hence  tying  the  archeological  record  to  a 
particular  group  or  affiliation  is  difficult  indeed. 

Rockman,  Harris,  and  Levin  (1983)  excavated 
features  behind  what  had  been  a  private 
boardinghouse  in  19th-century  New  York  City. 
They  report  on  the  construction  details  of  a 
cistern  containing  fill  from  the  boardinghouse 
period  of  occupation  and  present  a  detailed 
analysis  of  ceramics  from  this  feature.  The 
analysis  is  aimed  chiefly  at  interpreting  the 
socioeconomic  class  of  the  boardinghouse 
residents,  but  addresses  the  question  of 
boardinghouse  cuisine  as  well  (Rockman,  Harris, 
and  Levin  1983:  257).  At  this  New  York 
boardinghouse,  the  ratio  of  serving  bowls  to 
plates  was  small,  perhaps  reflecting  a  lack  of 
elaboration  in  table  service — a  phenomenon 
also  noted  by  Dutton  for  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse  (Chapter  6,  this  volume).  They 
state  in  summarizing  their  analysis  that  in  order 
to  understand  such  deposits  properly,  additional 
comparative  assemblages  are  needed.  Sadly, 
the  present  volume  cannot  offer  directly 
comparable  material,  for  the  majority  of  the 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    57 


Boott  Mills  material  dates  to  the  latter  part  of 
the  19th  and  early  20th  centuries. 

Faulkner  et  al.  (1978)  conducted  test 
excavations  at  the  site  of  a  mid-  to  late  19th- 
century  Newburyport,  Massachusetts, 
waterfront  boardinghouse  that  was  occupied  by 
Irish  immigrants.  Artifacts  were  recovered  from 
deposits  in  what  had  been  an  alley  rather  than 
from  sealed  features  (cf.  Figure  5-6).  The 
authors  (Faulkner  et  al.  1978:  80)  note  that 

The  household  goods  found  in  the  alley  trash  were 
modest.  ...Most  of  the  table  setting  was  imported 
from  England,  although  some  pieces  evidently  came 
from  Ireland....  Most  is  plain,  white  ironstone.... 
Generally  the  appearance  of  the  pottery  is 
functional,  antiseptic,  and  even  institutional. 
These  were  commonplace,  mass  produced  items 
with  not  a  hint  of  elegance. 

The  faunal  remains  from  the  Newburyport 
boardinghouse  included  a  great  deal  of  fish 
bones,  which  the  authors  link  to  the  Catholic 
background  of  the  residents.  Meat  was 
represented  by  commercially-butchered  bones 
that  had  been  sawn  or  chopped  into  relatively 
small  pieces;  these  included  many  soup  bones 
as  well  as  more  choice  cuts  of  meat.  Also 
present  were  a  variety  of  personal  objects  and 
children's  toys.  The  material  remains  from  this 
site  reflect  the  lifestyle  and  diet  of  people  who 
were  not  well  off  but  who  had  hopes  of  moving 
up  the  economic  ladder  into  a  more  comfortable 
existence. 

The  chief  difference  between  private 
boardinghouses  and  those  owned  by  large 
corporations — apart,  of  course,  from  the  scale  of 
operation — is  likely  to  have  been  the  nature  of 
residency.  For  the  most  part,  the  Lowell 
company  boardinghouses  did  not  house 
families.  This  was  probably  true  of  many  private 
boarding  situations,  but  private  houses  often 
were  family  homes  in  the  first  place.  This  was 
not  the  case  in  Lowell.  Comparison  between 
private  boardinghouses  and  company 
boardinghouses  cannot  be  made  without 
attending  to  these  differences.  There  are, 
however,  some  studies  that  treat  corporate 
boardinghouses.  In  our  first  report  on  the  Boott 
Mills  study  (Beaudry  and  Mrozowski  1987a),  we 
noted  the  work  of  Robert  Schuyler  and  his 
students  at  other  Lowell  boardinghouses. 

Jed  Levin's  on-going  analysis  of  material  from 
this  project  is  producing  interesting  results  on 
the  economic  basis  of  class  development  in  mid- 
century  Lowell  (e.g.,  Levin  1989).  His  study  will 
eventually  result  in  a  full  treatment  of  the 
artifacts  recovered  from  deposits  much  earlier 
than  those  we  report  on  in  this  volume.  The  sites 
were  corporate  boardinghouses,  however,  and 


hence   in   this   regard    will    provide   suitably 
comparable  data  for  the  present  study. 

As  noted  in  the  introduction  to  this  volume,  we 
found  it  useful  to  develop  a  model  for 
interpreting  the  Boott  boardinghouses  as  a 
particular  form  of  household.  Following  is  a 
discussion  of  the  rationale  for  interpreting  the 
Boott  boardinghouses  as  corporate  households 
sharing  many  features  of  conventional 
households  yet  possessing  some  unique 
characteristics  engendered  by  the  special 
conditions  at  Lowell. 


The      Boardinghouse      as      a      Corporate 
Household 

Archeological  study  of  the  backlots  of  the 
Boott  Mills  boardinghouses  in  Lowell, 
Massachusetts,  presented  a  special  challenge 
for  household  analysis.  We  approached  them 
both  as  reflections  of  corporate  policy  and  as  the 
arenas  for  workers'  domestic  and  leisure 
activities.  The  latter  aspect  of  the  study  has 
tackled  the  concept  of  the  household  as  it 
applies  to  corporate  living  arrangements  such  as 
the  situation  found  in  company  boardinghouses. 
The  following  discussion  is  drawn  from  Beaudry 
and  Mrozowski  1988  as  well  as  from  work  in 
progress. 

It  is  of  course  true  that  the  residential  make- 
up of  a  boardinghouse  can  seldom  be  viewed  in 
the  familial  sense  normally  employed  to 
characterize  households.  The  problem  is  one  of 
how  appropriately  to  define  the  corporate 
household.  As  with  other  sorts  of  households,  it 
probably  is  best  viewed  in  terms  of  its  structure 
(i.e.,  its  internal  composition  and  the 
relationships  among  its  residents)  and  the 
activities  it  performs.  Seldom,  however,  is 
kinship  the  significant  variable  in  the  residential 
composition  of  the  boardinghouse,  although 
related  individuals  may  be  present.  Laslett's 
analytical  synthesis  of  ideas  about  families  and 
households  reveals  that  scholars  have  tended  to 
avoid  a  definition  of  the  household  as  being  tied 
strictly  to  kinship  because  there  is  considerable 
variation  in  family  form  both  within  cultures  and 
cross-culturally  (Laslett  1972:  1-89).  Therefore 
the  definition  of  the  household  as  a  "co-resident 
domestic  group"  of  "those  who  share  the  same 
physical  space  for  the  purposes  of  eating, 
sleeping,  taking  rest  and  leisure,  growing  up, 
childrearing,  and  procreating"  (Laslett  1972:  24) 
is  for  the  most  part,  as  applicable  to  the 
corporate  household  as  it  is  to  that  of  more 
conventional  domestic  groups. 

Laslett  further  attempts  to  avoid  confusion 
between   the  terms  family  and  household  by 


58   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


>  $ 

3  ~ 

m  re 

j.  ■-». 

n  >-i 

tu  o 


n  n  09 

re  B  a 

o  »  re 

j  o  E  V1 

3    3  03.  S»  Av 

_]  '"r    n  re  * 

I  SJ  S  3  §• 

o  3-  n 


IT!  3 


re 


z:  *  2. 
3  3  31 

otj  a 
"  new 
3    <   re 

ZX"  0)  o 
ro  3:  JT 
re  «*  re  ,2 
<   3--<  09 

o-  Si  »  S3 


3  Ti 

°    2\ 
< 


'     5   3  re 
85  o-S.  ? 

">  *<    3    G 

3*  w    3^°^ 

c  E  o  3 

m      m      2 

n      *»  2 

c  3-CW 

3-  3 


^     3 


o-  5 

til 


n> 


3  TO  —  - 

1   g   «  H 

o   I  I  ^ 

■"*>  £■  3  IS 

"00  §> 

0)    ID  c 

3  re 


1 

r* 

■< 

Archeology  in  the  Backlots    59 


introducing  a  new  term,  houseful,  to  refer  to  the 
presence  under  one  roof  of  lodgers,  boarders, 
and  visitors,  whom  he  terms  inmates,  in 
conjunction  with  family  members.  Thus  a 
houseful  "means  all  persons  inhabiting  the 
same  set  of  premises,"  or  "the  crew  of  a  single 
building"  (Laslett  1972:  36).  In  Laslett's  scheme 
the  boardinghouse  is  a  houseful,  because  it  is  in 
no  way  a  family.  Yet  in  the  sense  that  a 
boardinghouse  was  a  co-resident  group  whose 
members  "share  the  same  physical  space  for 
purposes  of  eating,  sleeping,  and  taking  rest  and 
leisure,"  it  was  a  household.  Further,  its 
membership  shared  in  contributing  to  the 
economic  viability  of  the  household.  Although 
the  boardinghouse  often  had  a  fluctuating 
composition  because  of  worker  transience,  the 
nature  of  its  composition  changed  very  little  as  a 
result  of  such  fluidity.  Transience  in  residency 
may  have  been  a  characteristic  of  these 
'housefuls/  but  the  keeper,  the  household  head, 
often  enjoyed  a  very  long  tenure  and  provided 
continuity  in  the  midst  of  change.  Thus  while 
recognizing  the  ways  in  which  board inghouses 
differed  markedly  from  conventional 
households,  this  study  conceives  of  them  as 
corporate  households  as  a  means  of  providing  a 
conceptual  and  theoretical  framework  in  which 
to  interpret  them  from  an  archeological 
perspective.  In  this  way  boardinghouses  can  be 
examined  in  terms  of  how  their  company- 
controlled  structure  affected  the  domestic  lives 
of  their  residents  and  the  nature  of 
boardinghouse  keeping  as  a  social  and 
economic  activity. 

The  structure  of  the  corporate  households  of 
the  Lowell  boardinghouses  was  very  consistent 
in  most  regards.  In  the  early  years — the  'mill 
girl'  era — it  was  common  for  a  single  unit  to 
house  only  women  and,  in  a  few  instances,  only 
men.  Mixed  residency  was  not  prevalent  until 
late  in  the  19th  century.  The  result  was  more 
often  than  not  a  female-headed  household 
made  up  almost  solely  of  females.  Although 
their  ages  might  vary  considerable,  the  women 
making  up  these  households  worked  at  quite 
similar  jobs,  and  thus  there  was  little 
occupational  variation  (and  hence  only  small 
differences  in  income).  The  household  residents 
contributed  equally  to  what  may  be  termed 
household  income;  that  is,  each  person  living  in 
the  boardinghouse  had  the  cost  of  room  and 
board  subtracted  from  her  weekly  pay  before 
she  or  he  received  it.  The  keeper  in  turn 
received  a  lump  sum  from  the  corporation  and 
was  expected  to  run  the  household  on  this 
income  alone  and  to  keep  detailed,  accurate 
accounts  of  all  household  expenditures. 


The  boardinghouse  keeper  functioned  as 
head  of  household  and,  whether  male  or  female, 
was  responsible  for  feeding  household 
members,  for  day-to-day  care  and  cleaning  of 
the  premises,  for  maintaining  order  and 
discipline,  and  for  upholding  morality  within  the 
boardinghouse  'family.'  The  keeper  was  the 
primary  decision  maker  when  it  came  to 
household  purchasing  patterns;  the  nature  of 
the  boardinghouse  system  prompted  keepers  to 
economize  in  every  possible  area  (e.g.,  in 
purchasing  and  preparing  food,  in  selecting 
glassware  and  dishes  from  which  to  serve  meals, 
and  in  purchasing  or  renting  the  furnishings  for 
the  boardinghouse).  This  is  where  kinship  often 
played  an  important  role,  for  boardinghouse 
keepers  took  advantage  of  networks  formed 
through  kin  ties  in  the  larger  community.  In 
other  words,  they  transacted  business  with  a 
brother  who  was  a  provisioner,  a  brother-in-law 
who  was  a  grocer,  and  so  forth  (Landon  1987). 

For  these  reasons,  patterns  of  consumer 
behavior  for  the  corporate  household  were  an 
adaptation  to  a  rigidly-defined  system  that 
engendered  a  somewhat  unique  social  structure, 
but  one  that  nevertheless  resembled 
conventional  households  in  many  ways. 
Personal  (e.g.,  of  clothing,  hats,  jewelry,  patent 
medicines,  and  so  forth)  as  well  as  corporate 
(e.g.,  of  food,  serving  wares  and  utensils,  and 
furnishings)  purchase  and  consumption 
patterns  can  be  delineated.  What  is  more, 
evidence  for  the  two  contrasting  areas  of 
consumer  behavior  can  be  recovered 
archeologically  in  the  form  of  faunal  remains, 
glass  fragments,  pottery  sherds,  etc.,  for  the 
latter  pattern  and  in  the  form  of  beads,  buttons, 
costume  jewelry  remains,  hair  combs,  smoking 
pipes,  marbles,  and  so  forth  for  the  former.  The 
corporate  pattern  was  initiated  by  the  keeper,  an 
individual  whose  choices  were  governed  by  the 
nature  the  boardinghouse  system.  If  the  keeper 
hoped  to  make  a  go  of  a  boardinghouse,  she  or 
he  had  to  stretch  the  allotment  from  the 
corporation  as  far  as  it  would  go.  Clever  and 
careful  keepers  could  turn  a  profit  by 
economizing  on  household  purchases  and  by 
bending  or  flouting  company  rules  when  they 
could. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  personal  objects 
recovered  archeologically  reflect  individual 
choices — purchases  made  by  residents  of  the 
corporate  household.  They  do  not  serve  as 
indicators  of  status  or  economic  position,  for,  as 
mentioned  above,  the  nature  of  the  corporate 
household  provided  little  or  no  room  for  such 
internal  variation  in  the  co-resident  domestic 
group.     Our  analysis  of  such  materials  has 


60   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


focused  on  leisure  time  and  worker  response  to 
the  corporate  environment  (cf.  Jones  1977;  Bond 
1988).  The  contrasting  patterns  of  corporate  and 
personal  purchase  and  use  of  material  culture 
revealed  through  analysis  of  items  recovered 
from  the  boardinghouse  backlots  can  illuminate 
poorly-documented  aspects  of  workers'  lives  and 
prevent  us  from  succumbing  to  the  "temptation 
to  translate  archival  silence  into  historical 
passivity"  (Jones  1977: 163). 


Excavation  Strategy 

Summary  of  Previous  Archeology 

As  part  of  the  residential  component  of  the 
project,  initial  archeological  investigations  in  the 
Boott  Mills  study  consisted  of  a  brief  phase  of 
exploratory  testing  in  the  fall  of  1985  in  the  Locks 
and  Canals  parking  lot  destined  to  become  the 
Lowell  Boarding  House  Park.  Four  1  m  x  3  m  test 
trenches  were  placed  at  locations  determined  by 
juxtaposing  the  1892  Sanborn  Fire  Insurance 
map  over  a  modern  map  of  the  parking  lot 
layout  (while  designed  to  encounter 
boardinghouse  features,  the  test  trenches 
nevertheless  had  to  coincide  with  existing 
parking  spaces;  see  Beaudry  and  Mrozowski 
1987a  for  a  full  discussion  of  the  results  of 
testing).  Measurements  made  off  of  the 
restored  boardinghouse  in  accord  with  the  scale 
of  the  Sanborn  map  proved  highly  accurate  as 
indicators  for  placing  test  units  that  could  target 
features  beneath  the  parking  lot  surface.  Figure 
5-7  shows  the  footprints  of  the  former  Boott 
boardinghouses  superimposed  on  a  map  of  the 
Locks  and  Canals  parking  lot  (since  turned  into 
the  Lowell  Boarding  House  Park)  and  indicates 
the  areas  of  testing  and  excavation. 

During  the  summer  of  1986,  a  two-week 
investigation  in  the  backlot  of  the  Massachusetts 
Mill  side  of  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  house  duplex 
provided  an  opportunity  for  detailed 
investigation  of  the  rear  yard  of  a  middle-class 
supervisor's  home.  Despite  the  brief  field 
season,  approximately  30%  of  the  backlot  was 
explored.  No  sealed  features  (e.g.,  pits  or 
privies)  relating  to  occupation  by  agents' 
families  were  discovered,  but  the  built-up  soil 
strata  of  the  backlot  proved  rich  in  artifactual 
material  as  well  as  contextual  data  derived  from 
pollen,  soil  chemistry,  phytolith,  and  macrofossil 
evidence. 

The  contextual  data  were  used  in  two  ways. 
First  the  pollen,  plant  macrofossil,  and  phytolith 
data  were  used  to  reconstruct  changes  in  plant 
communities  over  time  in  the  yard  of  the  Agents' 
House.  These  data,  combined  with  the  results  of 


soils  analysis,  provided  important  information 
concerning  the  development  of  yard  deposits 
and,  by  extension,  the  archeological  record.  This 
has  proven  to  be  indispensable  to  efforts  to 
correlate  individual  strata  with  particular 
households. 

The  fact  that  a  great  deal  of  information  about 
successive  households  and  land  use  at  the 
Agents'  House  could  be  gleaned  from  soil  strata 
helps  to  dispel  the  widespread  notion  that,  at 
urban  sites,  only  the  contents  of  sealed  features 
are  of  analytical  or  interpretive  merit.  The  data 
derived  from  the  investigations  are  presented  in 
detail  in  a  full-length  monograph  on  the 
excavations  (Beaudry  and  Mrozowski  1987b). 


Archeology  in  the  Boardinghouse  Backlots 

In  the  fall  of  1986,  the  Boott  boardinghouse 
backlots  again  became  the  focus  of 
archeological  attention.  This  five-week  effort 
involved  exposure  of  two  complete  backlots,  that 
of  Boott  unit  #48,  an  end  tenement  for 
supervisory  personnel,  as  well  as  that  of  #45,  a 
'typical'  boardinghouse.  These  two  lots  were 
chosen  both  because  they  offered  a  contrast 
between  yard  use  behind  the  boardinghouses 
versus  that  behind  family-occupied  tenements 
and  because  the  boardinghouse  block  in  which 
these  units  were  located  had  been  torn  down 
earlier  in  the  20th  century  than  most  of  the  other 
blocks.  Thus,  it  was  reasoned,  they  had  been 
part  of  the  archeological  record  longest  and, 
more  important,  had  not  seen  extended  use  as 
apartments  or  warehouses,  as  had  many  of  the 
other  boardinghouse  blocks. 

Each  boardinghouse  and  each  rear  tenement 
had  an  enclosed  backlot  with  a  woodshed 
housing  a  privy  and  used  as  well  for  storing 
wood,  coal,  and  garbage  awaiting  collection.  The 
small  yards  (ca.  10  m  deep  by  8  m  wide),  two  of 
which  were  fully  exposed  and  sampled  during 
the  archeological  project,  were  used  chiefly  for 
service  purposes  such  as  laundering  and  drying 
clothes.  Residents  of  boardinghouses  had 
access  to  the  privy  through  a  rear  door  in  the 
building's  service  area  (in  the  case  of  unit  #46, 
for  example,  excavation  revealed  remains  of  a 
rough  brick-paved  path  apparently  leading  from 
the  rear  of  the  house  to  the  privy  shared  by  units 
#45  and  #46).  Most  boarders  were  responsible 
for  personal  laundry,  although  the  keeper 
provided  linens  and  so  forth.  Presumably  the 
keeper  and  her  helpers  made  most  use  of  the 
boardinghouse  backlots,  even  though  boarders 
had  ready  access  to  them.  The  tenement 
backlots  were  more  likely  the  domain  of 
overseers'  or  skilled  workers'  wives  when  the 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    61 


prescribed  arrangement  (i.e.,  occupation  by  a 
nuclear  family)  obtained;  unit  #48,  however, 
initially  housed  an  unmarried  man  and  two 
other  males.  In  such  situations  it  seems  likely 
that  the  men  employed  a  non-resident 
housekeeper  to  do  the  cooking  and  cleaning. 

The  broad  area  exposure  (i.e.,  of  two  10  x  10  m 
blocks,  designated  as  Operation  A  and 
Operation  B,  respectively)  revealed  the  backlots 
fully,  allowing  for  all  features — pits,  postholes,  ell 
foundations,  privy,  well,  drains,  etc. — to  be 
recorded  in  plan  (Figures  5-8,  5-9  and  10).  Some 
of  these  features  were  fully  excavated,  while 
others  were  sampled,  and  samples  of  yard 
deposits,  where  they  existed,  were  taken. 

The  asphalt  surface  of  the  parking  lot  was 
broken  up  with  a  backhoe;  a  bobcat  was  used  to 
remove  the  rubble  and  to  scrape  off  some  of  the 
sand  bedding  for  the  asphalt.  When  Operation 
A  was  opened,  the  bobcat  operator  gouged  too 
deeply  in  places  (the  deposits  were  right  below 
the  sand).  When  Operation  B  was  opened,  he 
was  directed  to  remove  asphalt  only  and  we 
shoveled  off  the  sand.  Yard  deposits  seemed 
more  intact  in  Operation  B  than  in  A,  but  the 
difference  in  opening  them  is  not  wholly 
accountable  for  this;  the  Operation  A  backlot 
appears  to  have  been  subjected  to  more 
scraping  that  the  Operation  B  backlot.  Good 
evidence  for  this  was  that  in  B,  a  layer  of  window 
glass  formed  a  surface  that  sealed  off  the 
deposits;  no  such  demolition-produced  seal  was 
found  in  A,  nor  did  A  have  any  appreciable 
accumulation  of  soil  or  other  material  (e.g., 
refuse)  above  the  substratum.  Therefore  some 
differences  between  the  lots  are  attributable  to 
the  razing  of  the  houses  ca..l934,  use  of  the  area 
as  a  coal  yard  until  ca.  1950,  and  subsequent 
preparation  of  the  area  for  a  parking  lot. 

Once  the  parking  lot  surface  was  removed,  the 
sand  bedding  was  shovelled  off;  subsequent 
strata  were  trowelled  or  shovel-schnitted  and 
screened  through  1/4-in  hardware  mesh.  As 
noted  above,  our  aim  was  to  provide  broad  area 
exposure  in  order  to  map  the  features  of  the 
backlots,  hence  we  concentrated  on  uncovering 
and  recording  features  rather  than  excavating 
them.  In  Operation  A,  we  excavated  several 
features  or  portions  of  features;  fewer  features 
were  explored  in  Operation  B  because  we  ran 
out  of  time.  This  was  especially  disappointing,  as 
the  Operation  B  backlot  was  much  richer  in  yard 
deposits  than  A,  and  these  had  been  sealed  by  a 
layer  of  window  glass  deposited  either  during 
demolition  or,  more  likely,  when  the  windows 
were  boarded  up  during  conversion  of  the  block 
to  a  warehouse.  Another  disappointment  was 
that  we  were  unable  to  take  overall  photographs 


of  Operation  B.  On  the  last  day  of  field  work,  the 
area  was  cleaned  and  the  crew  awaiting  the 
National  Park  Service  cherry  picker  loaned  to  us 
before  we  closed  Operation  A  when  word  was 
received  that  Congress  had  failed  to  pass  a 
holding  resolution  to  permit  the  government  to 
operate  without  an  approved  budget.  All  Park 
Service  employees  were  sent  home  at  noon  that 
day,  and  we  were  left  with  a  very  tidy  site  we 
could  photograph  only  from  atop  our  ladder  or 
van.  The  plan  map  of  Operation  B,  along  with  a 
few  close-up  photographs  of  features,  provide 
the  illustrations  for  our  discussion  of  this  area. 

Following  are  summary  descriptions  of  the 
features  uncovered  in  each  excavation  area. 
The  discussion  first  treats  Operation  A,  the 
backlot  of  Boott  tenement  #48,  and  then  moves 
to  a  discussion  of  Operation  B,  the  backlot  of 
Boott  boardinghouse  #45.  It  should  be  noted 
that  features  were  numbered  as  they  were 
encountered,  beginning  with  the  testing  phase  in 
1985,  so  the  numbers  do  not  follow  a  sequence 
within  the  excavation  areas.  Features  1-14  were 
all  uncovered  during  the  initial  testing  phase 
and  are  discussed  in  Beaudry  and  Mrozowski 
1987a.  Operation  A  is  illustrated  in  plan  in 
Figures  5-8  and  5-9;  Operation  B  in  Figure  5-10. 


Operation  A 

Feature  15,  0N2W,  level  1:    Cobble  Surface  (?) 

This  grouping  of  stones  was  tentatively 
identified  as  a  cobble  surface  when  first 
uncovered.  It  consisted  of  five  stones  roughly  in 
line  extending  north-south  for  ca.  1  m  along  the 
southern  edge  of  this  unit.  This  feature  lies  ca.  2 
m  outside  of  the  tenement  backlot,  south  of  its 
former  fence  line,  in  an  area  that  would  have 
been  the  walkway  along  French  Street.  Whether 
this  alignment  of  stones  formed  portion  of  a 
bedding  for  the  walkway,  served  as  a  rough  curb 
along  the  edge  of  the  street,  or  is  simply 
redeposited  material  resulting  from  utility 
installations  along  French  Street  is  unclear. 


Feature  16/42  ,  8N2W,  level  3:    Cess  pit  (?) 

Feature  16  was  identified  as  a  rubbish  pit  in 
the  northwest  corner  of  unit  8N2W.  It  measured 
ca.  52  x  53  cm;  its  fill  was  a  dark  greyish  brown 
(10YR  3/2)  fine  sand  with  pebbles,  some  wood, 
and  a  great  deal  of  coal.  The  excavator  noted 
that  some  of  the  rotten  wood  appeared  to  have 
been  logs  or  planks  running  north-south  and 
used  to  cover  the  artifact-rich  deposit.  This 
feature  lies  directly  behind  a  brick  drainage 
feature  (feature  36),  possibly  a  cesspit.     It  is 


62    The  Board inghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


a 

m 

-t 

p 


£■•  a  c  EL  ^ 


3 

»  o 
O  d 
o 

3 
a- 

(0 


n 

3 


w 
9 

a 

D 

&>   o 

S.  c 

3* 
H  n 
•      O 

U3 
c  -a 

o  b. 

^   3 


ft)       gi 

-►  ft) 

3*  (/> 


5.   3" 

?» 

(0       rr 
00    3. 

vO   3 

o    < 


n  31 

n 

aj  ^ 

ffiS 

—  3 

2.  o 

ft>      M 

a.  vo 

ro    ST 
3     fO 

O     ^ 

«■    TO 

^  3 

2  S- 

rt1     ft) 
O    3 

3  a 
a  oo 


3 
pi 
T3 


a 


3 
00. 

cr 


era   8 
3*  * 

o    ft> 

c   < 

?? 


►a  3 

S? 
3.  n> 

<">   •— i 

£^ 

o  P 

oq  3 

ft)  D- 

3 


s 
.- « 


U=l 


o 


1 

i 

o 

■D 

«           j  L 

a 

B                  O   1         J 

o 

> 

1   lu 

a 

01 

-I 


!     □! 


Archeology  in  the  Bacldots    63 


'  MS 


Qnnmraps7  Q^  <? 


owoll  BM8H     Opsx 


»  ON  OW    Unir  Number  (NE  Coma') 


^ 


<V^ 


Figure  5-8.  Plan  of  Operation  A,  the  rear  yard  of  Boott  unit  48,  a  supervisors  tenement. 
Residents  of  the  street-facing  tenement  did  not  have  direct  access  to  the  backlot  and  its 
privy  but  had  to  enter  through  the  gate  opening  (features  21  and  22,  bottom  center,  are 
post  holes  of  this  gate)  onto  French  street.  (Drawing  by  David  H.  Dutton.) 


64   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


<?  4 


Ac 


0 


o 


Figure  5-9.  Plan  of  Operation  B,  the  rear  yard  of  Boott  unit  45  and  a  small  portion  of  unit 
44  (at  top);  both  were  boardinghouses.  (Drawing  by  David  H.  Dutton.) 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    65 


•£ 

60  S 

'C     3 

O 

0>   <*. 

X   = 


TJ 

C     « 

o  -? 
tj 

o 
o 


u 

JS 

"oS 
o 

TJ 
I 

s 


-5 

.5  bo 

TJ  .S 
0>    *J 

(A      C 

£^ 
53  "2.5 

i«2 


ft]      4_» 

o   <u 


2~ 


o> 

x; 


01 

s 

o    « 

15  •£ 
i-. 


~o  to 

^o> 

•C    3    (X 
CU  « 
0>  JJ 

c 

4  jf.g 
IIS 


O 


■a  jd 


o)   o   3   m 
>    (X£  > 

TJ    —      0)        . 


qj       .55,  *-< 

|  S  -  t 


6  fr 

O     0>   TJ 

V  tj   £ 


(0     0) 

U 


o  c 
S  o 


66   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


located  in  the  same  area  of  the  backlot  as  the 
cess  pool  of  the  Bay  State  boardinghouses  shown 
in  plan  in  Figure  7-11. 

It  further  seems  likely  that  it  was  inside  of  the 
former  woodshed.  The  stones  directly  south  of  it 
may  have  been  part  of  the  woodshed 
'foundation/  if  such  a  term  can  be  employed  to 
describe  what  was  in  fact  a  most  flimsy  and 
ephemeral  construction.  Hence  the  wood  may 
have  been  part  of  the  flooring  for  the  woodshed 
(if  indeed  it  had  a  floor — the  presence  of  the 
privy  suggests  it  might  have).  This  would  mean 
the  artifacts  accumulated  beneath  the 
woodshed  in  a  crawlspace.  On  the  other  hand,  if 
it  lay  outside  the  shed,  the  wood  may  have 
served  as  some  sort  of  covering  for  the  cesspit  or 
as  a  platform  or  surface  to  permit  foot  traffic  in 
an  otherwise  mucky  area. 


Feature  17,  8N2W,  level  3:     Rubbish  pit/posthole 

(?) 

This  feature,  in  the  northeast  corner  of  the 
unit,  was  a  round  pit  ca.  18  x  40  cm  in  size.  It  had 
two  zones  of  fill;  the  upper  fill  was  a  fine,  very 
dark  greyish  brown  silty  sand  (10YR  3/2)  with 
pebbles,  while  the  lower  zone  consisted  of  a  fine 
pale  brown  sand  (10YR  6/3).  The  two  zones  were 
separated  by  a  lens  of  ash.  A  contiguous  column 
of  17  pollen  samples  was  taken  from  this  feature 
but  not  analyzed  for  the  present  report.  It  is 
unclear  whether  this  filled-in  hole  or  pit  once 
held  a  post,  as  no  clear  post  mold  showed  up  in 
the  profile.  It  does  lie  along  the  boundary 
separating  the  tenement  backlot  from  that  of  the 
adjacent  boardinghouse,  however,  and  this 
would  have  been  a  likely  spot  for  a  post  support 
either  for  the  end  of  the  tenement  section  of  the 
woodshed  or  for  the  fence  separating  the  two 
yards. 


Feature   18,   8N2W,   level  3: 
mold  (?) 


Rubbish  pit /post 


This  round  pit  measured  ca.  65  cm  in  diameter 
and  contained  what  seemed  to  be  a  post  mold 
ca.  15  cm  in  diameter.  The  fill  was  a  mixture  of 
find  brown  sands.  This  may  had  been  a  post 
support  for  the  western  edge  of  the  woodshed  (it 
aligns  roughly  with  features  19  and  48  some  7.5 
m  to  the  south,  as  well  as  with  feature  46).  If  so 
interpreted,  this  permits  the  woodshed  a  total 
depth  of  only  ca.  2.5  m;  it  seems  more  likely  that 
features  16/39,  20,  and  24  are  evidence  of  the 
western  edge  of  the  shed. 


Feature  19,  0N2W,  level  2:    Posthole 

Features  19,  21,  and  22  all  were  postholes  that 
had  once  held  posts  for  the  fence  enclosing  the 
tenement;  the  southern  run  of  the  fence  had  a 
gate  permitting  access  to  the  backlot  from  the 
street.  Feature  19  had  held  a  regular  post,  while 
features  20  and  21  had  held  gateposts.  The 
feature,  ca.  15  cm  in  diameter,  was  not 
excavated.  The  top  of  the  posthole  showed 
stones  set  in  a  matrix  of  dark  brown  sandy  silt 
mottled  with  orange  and  grey  sand. 


Feature  20,  4N4W:    Stone  post  support 

This  flat  rectangular  rock,  ca.  30  x  40  cm,  had 
been  quarried.  It  appeared  to  have  served  as  a 
base  for  a  post  supporting  the  woodshed 
superstructure;  surrounding  the  rock  was  a  dark 
brown  sandy  matrix  (10YR  4/3)  with  a  great  deal 
of  rotten  wood,  charcoal,  and  chunks  of  what 
appeared  to  be  marine  clay. 


Feature  21,  1N4W:    Posthole 

This  large  posthole,  the  southern  gatepost,  was 
roughly  oblong  in  shape,  measuring  ca.  25  x  33 
cm  in  plan  and  extending  ca.  80  cm  in  depth 
below  grade.  The  fill  of  the  post  hole  was  a 
mottled  yellow-grey  silty  sand  with  dark  brown 
mottling  and  contained  a  large  number  of  brick 
fragments.  The  lack  of  a  clearly  visible  mold 
indicates  that  the  post  probably  had  been  pulled 
out,  although  a  few  bits  of  rotten  wood  were 
recovered,  and  the  excavator  noted  that  bricks 
and  stones  seemed  to  have  been  packed  around 
what  had  been  the  post. 


Feature  22,  1N6W:    Posthole 

This  posthole,  the  northern  gatepost,  was 
essentially  round  (ca.  40  cm  in  diameter)  and 
was  dug  into  the  sandy  substratum.  Its  fill 
consisted  of  dark  brown  silt  (10YR  3/3)  with  tan 
clay  inclusions  as  well  as  brick  and  stones.  The 
excavator  interpreted  the  latter  as  support 
packing  for  the  post.  A  discoloration  that  may 
have  been  a  post  mold  showed  up  at  the  top  of 
the  feature  but  did  not  continue  through  the 
entire  profile;  this  presumably  means  that  the 
post  was  removed  before  it  decomposed  fully. 


Feature  23,   2N8W,   2N6W,   1N8W:      Bulkhead 
entry 

The  stairwell  for  the  bulkhead  entry  into  the 
cellar  and  its  fill  was  designated  as  feature  23. 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    67 


Figure  5-11.  Feature  23,  the  bulkhead  entry.  Note  that  entry  into  cellar  has  been 
blocked  up.  Camera  faces  west.  (Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.) 


68   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  life 


Q 


STcw 

s  e 

op  Y1 

3"   '-' 
O     t° 

S"    ^< 

X" 
? 

3  £ 

3  « 

cj    c 

?  Is 

if 

S  o- 

O     ft) 
OQ    D 

£3 

^8 

""3  in 
0)  3* 
C     O 

3 

(D<w 

It  ?? 

?  H 


w 

D 

a 

CO 

oo 


■  tx. 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    69 


(Figures  5-8,  5-9,  5-11,  and  5-12).  The  stairwell, 
an  opening  measuring  ca.  1.96  m  x  2.7  m,  was 
constructed  of  dry-laid  quarried  granite;  it  had 
been  filled  completely  with  coal  ash/slag  and 
furnace  scale  of  a  dark  greyish  brown  color.  A 
series  of  six  granite  steps  extended  downwards 
to  the  cellar  opening,  which  had  been  blocked 
up  with  firebrick  and  stone  at  some  time  before 
the  building  was  destroyed  (the  fill  of  the 
bulkhead  contained  a  great  deal  of  the  firebrick 
razed  from  this  partition  when  the  structure  was 
demolished).  Presumably  the  entry  was  blocked 
up  to  prevent  break-ins  and  pilferage  when  the 
building  was  converted  to  a  warehouse. 


Feature  24,  2N4W,  level  1:     Shallow  depression 
or  lens 

This  shallow  lens  (ca.  3  cm  in  depth,  ca.  15  cm 
in  diameter)  of  dark  sandy  silt  with  charcoal 
(10YR  3/2,  very  dark  greyish  brown)  contained  a 
high  concentration  of  artifacts  (e.g.,  ceramics, 
stoneware,  glass,  a  button)  and  a  peach  pit  (see 
Mrozowski,  Chapter  12,  this  volume).  It  seems  to 
have  been  a  hollow  depression  in  the  yard 
surface  that  became  filled  with  debris. 


Feature  27,  2N8W,  4N8W:    Planting  hole 

This  irregularly-shaped  feature  (ca.  60  cm  x 
110  cm  x  60  cm)  near  the  corner  formed  by  the 
juncture  of  the  bulkhead  entry  and  the  back  wall 
of  the  boardinghouse,  was  a  planting  hole 
(Figures  5-8,  5-10,  5-13).  It  was  filled  with  dark 
brown  (7.5  YR  3/4)  sandy  loam  with  orange 
mottles  and  some  small  fist-sized  stones.  In 
addition  to  many  ceramic  fragments,  it 
contained  the  remains  of  an  extensive  root 
network  from  the  plant  or  plants  that  had  grown 
there. 


Feature  28,  4N4W:     Clothesline  support? 

A  large  rock  deemed  a  probable  base  for  a 
post  or  pole  supporting  a  clothesline  or  other 
yard  feature,  feature  28  had  a  ca.  5-cm  diameter 
hole  bored  into  its  center.  The  hole  contained 
corroded  iron  fragments.  The  stone  itself  was 
light  grey  granite,  ca.  48  cm  x  77  cm.  It  is 
possible  that  the  pole  or  pipe  inserted  into  the 
drilled  hole  supported  a  flimsy  version  of  the 
umbrella-style  carousel  clotheslines  that  can  be 
seen  in  Figures  5-2,  5-3,  and  5-4. 


Feature  25,  2N10W,  0N1OW:    Cellar  fill 

The  area  of  cellar  fill  behind  the  blocked-up 
bulkhead  entry  (feature  23)  lay  south  of  an 
internal  partition  wall  of  the  cellar  and  provided 
a  relatively  safe  area  in  which  to  sink  a  test  into 
the  cellar  fill  (Figures  5-8,  5-10,  5-13).  The 
excavated  portion  of  cellar  fill  measured  ca.  1.30 
m  north-south  by  ca.  1.50  m  east-west  by  ca.  70- 
80  cm  in  depth  below  grade.  The  fill  had  very 
little  soil  and  consisted  chiefly  of  rubble:  bricks; 
mortar;  slate  fragments;  plaster;  window  glass; 
and  various  corroded  iron  objects,  including 
portions  of  gutters,  downspouts,  and  pipes  from 
the  building's  plumbing  system.  The  excavation 
revealed  that  while  the  cellar  foundation  was  set 
on  a  footing  of  granite  (cf.  Beaudry  1987:  fig.  7-9), 
the  cellar  floor  was  nothing  more  than  fine  white 
glacial  sand. 


Feature  26,  0N1OW:    Builder's  trench 

This  feature  was  interpreted  as  a  portion  of  the 
construction  trench  for  the  bulkhead  entry;  it  ran 
east-west  along  the  southern  edge  of  feature  23; 
only  the  portion  lying  outside  the  stone  apron 
surrounding  the  bulkhead  was  excavated.  This 
area  measured  ca.  20  cm  wide  x  2  m  long;  the  fill 
was  a  very  dark  greyish  brown  sandy  silt  (10YR 
3/2)  and  contained  very  few  artifacts. 


Feature  29/42,  4N4W:    Posthole  and  post  mold 

This  posthole  still  contained  the  deteriorated 
remains  of  a  wood  post  in  its  center  (it  is  labeled 
42  on  Figure  5-5).  The  post  hole  measured  ca.  27 
cm  x  39  cm  in  top  plan  (it  was  not  excavated). 
The  upper  fill  was  observed  to  be  a  very  dark 
greyish  brown  (10YR  3/2)  fine  sand.  The 
post/post  mold  was  surrounded  by  various 
cobbles  and  bricks.  This  posthole  was  placed 
almost  exactly  in  the  center  of  the  backlot.  It 
also  is  a  likely  candidate  for  a  clothesline 
support.  Directly  west  of  this  feature  was  a  large 
area  of  darkened  soil;  this  was  not  given  a 
feature  designation  and  was  not  explored  in  any 
detail,  but  it  may  have  been  a  pit  of  some  kind  or 
simply  an  area  that  had  been  repeatedly 
trodden  during  use  of  the  clothesline.  Note  that 
in  Figures  5-2,  5-3,  and  5-4,  there  are  special 
platforms  beneath  the  clotheslines.  These  would 
have  made  it  easier  for  women  to  hang  out 
washing  when  the  ground  beneath  the  line  was 
unpleasantly  muddy  to  stand  on.  The  platforms 
no  doubt  also  permitted  shorter  people  to  reach 
the  lines  without  stretching  on  tip-toe. 


70   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Ci  3.  •**■  <J"  cr  £  ti 

o   -£  '     ™  E  -■  c 

o  v  5>  Bt  g"  5-  3 

3"  n    «■   c  D    ra 

S3  S   =  r?  fT  £  * 

c  ra  ~  Si  g.  -  o 

~  Q-  S  c  c  o  2 


cr  C 

CD 

^ 

- 

ra 
in 

*-* 
CD 

3 

Cv 

3' 

a* 

o 

X 

o   o 
£."2. 

n 

rv 

HI 

—— 

IK 

a. 

*"" ' 

3* 
o 

3 

a. 

n" 

3 

o 

c 
CN 
3" 

-a 

ra 

ra 

3' 
gq 

3* 

Bl 

-t 

ra 

CD 

5- 
ra 
a* 
o 

O 

-i 

u> 

ra 

CJ 

o 

ra 
3 

C-J 

i/i 

3- 

a 

CD 
n 

n 

3 

CD 

a 

ra 

ra 

5* 

3' 

3* 
0 

c 

in 
ra 

CD 

"2. 

ra" 

CD 

s 

CD 

3' 

C 

ra 

V) 

c 
3 

ra 

o 

"J 

rJ5" 

3 

n 

-1 

K) 

ra 

ra 

^J 

-i 

n 

w 
3 

TO 
B> 

-»^ 

CD 

n 

CD 

m 

CD 
3 

a 
d> 

4- 
CD 

is 

s 

ra 
u 
** 

B> 

3 

a 

CD 
3 

a 
w 

po 

3 

ra 
-i 
ra 

2 

cr 
gj 

ra 

o 
3 

* 

3 

,-r 

CD 

CD 

ra 

a 

3* 

~i 

3 

n 

ro 
in 

3' 

3 

ra 

ra 

t 

cr 

ra_ 

ra_ 

o 

ra 

in 

s 

m 

5" 

ra 

CD 

— r* 

3 

CD 

$ 

ra 

5" 

„ 

ra 

5 

-3 

ra 

3" 

-i 

ra 

*aiWWi 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    71 


Feature  30,  10W  range  of  units:     Back  wall  of 
boardinghouse    block 

The  back  wall  of  the  boardinghouse  was  given 
a  feature  designation  that  was  also  applied  to  fill 
west  of  it  over  the  rubble  fill  of  the  cellar 
foundation  (Figures  5-8,  5-10,  5-13).  Two  bricks 
wide,  the  wall  measured  ca.  60  cm  wide  at  this 
level  (the  granite  sills  and  the  foundation  proper 
being  much  wider — see  Figure  5-9,  where 
feature  30  included  some  displaced  sill  stones). 
The  rubble  was  exposed  but  not  excavated;  the 
matrix  in  which  the  bricks,  mortar,  plaster,  etc., 
occurred  was  a  mottled  sand  and  loam,  with  dark 
orange,  red,  dark  brown,  and  light  olive  grey  soils 
as  well  as  glass  fragments,  pottery  and  ceramics, 
and  rodent  bones  (see  Chapter  9). 


Feature  31,  8N10W:    Internal  partition  wall 

This  brick  wall  segment  appeared  to  be  a 
portion  of  an  interior  partition  wall  inside  the 
tenement  and  in  Boott  Unit  #46,  which  was 
adjacent  to  the  #48  tenement  and  shared  its  well 
(Feature  43;  Figures  5-8,  5-10,  5-13).  The 
partition  was  at  least  two  brick  courses  wide, 
running  north-south;  it  extended  south  from 
feature  32,  the  party  wall  between  the  two  units, 
before  turning  a  right  angle  and  heading  west.  It 
is  unclear  what  function  this  wall  served  in  terms 
of  internal  room  divisions  in  the  building;  it  does 
not  appear  to  have  been  a  bearing  wall. 


sequence  of  ell  construction  for  Boott  workers' 
housing.  Note  that  the  ell  (feature  50)  behind 
#45,  the  boardinghouse,  was  of  greater  length  in 
plan. 


Feature  34,  6N8W,  8N8W:    Brick  drainbox 

This  feature  ran  diagonally  southwest- 
northeast  across  the  ell,  linking  the  well  with  the 
back  of  the  boardinghouse.  It  was  a  brick 
drainbox,  ca.  18-19  cm  wide,  formed  of  strechers 
mortared  together  atop  brickbats  placed  on 
edge  to  form  the  box.  The  drain  carried  a  1-in 
lead  pipe  from  the  well,  presumably  into  the 
tenement  kitchen  or  a  cistern  below  it.  The  pipe 
had  been  installed  as  part  of  the  original 
construction  of  the  well  and  boardinghouse 
complex. 


Feature  35,  8N4W:    Pit 

This  feature  was  roughly  oblong  in  shape,  with 
a  number  of  stones  measuring  ca.  20-25  cm  x  ca. 
10-15  cm  in  its  southeast  corner.  The  fill  of  the 
feature  was  a  highly  organic  loam  (10YR  3/3, 
dark  brown);  it  appeared  to  have  been  lined  with 
grey  clay.  Although  it  was  not  fully  excavated,  a 
portion  of  the  fill  was  sampled,.  Artifacts  were 
numerous  in  this  fill.  This  feature  is  most  likely  a 
cesspit  or  a  portion  of  the  cesspit  complex;  see 
discussions  of  features  16/39  and  36. 


Feature  32,  8N10W:    Party  wall 

This  stone  and  brick  segment  of  the  party  wall 
between  the  tenement  and  boardinghouse  #46 
was  designated  as  feature  32.  Feature  31 
abutted  this  wall  north  and  south.  The  part  wall 
was  40  cm  wide;  granite  stones  provided  the  level 
bearing  surface  upon  which  bricks  had  been 
mortared  (traces  of  mortar  remained  on  the 
exposed  stones)  to  form  the  above-grade  portion 
of  this  wall. 


Feature    33,     6N6W,     6N8W,     8N8W:        Ell 
foundation 

This  ashlar  construction,  essentially  a  crude 
assembly  of  unmortared  stones  in  a  shallow 
trench,  served  as  the  foundation  for  the  ell  of  the 
tenement  (Figures  5-8,  5-10,  5-13,  5-14)  There 
was  no  evidence  of  vent  holes  for  a  crawlspace, 
but  there  undoubtedly  was  some  open  space 
beneath  the  floor  of  the  ell  in  which  refuse  had 
accumulated.  This  ell  is  what  Clancey  (1987a:  25) 
described  as  a  "stubby  ell"  when  discussing  the 


Feature  36,  8N4W:    Brick  drip  paving 

This  feature  consisted  of  two  rows  of  brickbats 
set  flat  and  sloping  inwards  toward  two  rows  of 
brick  set  lengthwise  on  end.  It  measured  40  cm  x 
50  cm  and  apparently  had  served  as  a  drip 
paving  flanked  on  either  side  by  cesspits 
(feature  16/39  to  the  east  and  feature  35  to  the 
west;  see  discussions  of  each  of  these  features). 


Feature  37,  8N6W:    Brick  drain  box 

This  rectangular  brick  drain  box  was  a 
downspout  for  collecting  roof  runoff,  probably 
from  the  ell.  It  measured  52  cm  x  61  cm  external 
dimension,  31  cm  x  24  cm  internal  dimension. 
The  downspout  fed  into  a  stoneware  utility  pipe 
1.3  m  below  grade.  Its  fill,  which  contained  many 
artifacts  (including  a  broken  cast  iron  coal  grate, 
crown  bottle  caps,  and  a  peach  pit),  was  a  black 
sandy  loam  (10YR  2/1). 


72    The  Board inghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


,m 


■     J* 


Figure  5-14.  Detail  of  Operation  A  showing  features  33,  34,  43,  37,  and  44.  Only  a  portion 
of  feature  44  was  excavated;  the  trench  continues  around  the  corner  of  the  ell 
foundation  and  is  cut  by  feature  38,  a  planting  hole.  Camera  faces  south.  (Photograph 
by  Paul  S.  Giblin.) 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    73 


Feature  38,  4N8W:     Post  hole/Post  mold 

At  its  surface  this  feature  appeared  as  a  thin 
deposit  of  brick  chops  and  mortar  with  an 
occasional  half  brickbat,  ca.  65  cm  x  80  cm.  After 
being  taken  down  a  bit,  it  still  had  no  clear  edge 
definition;  a  possible  post  mold  did  show  up  in 
the  center  of  the  hole,  which  became  better 
defined  as  the  excavation  proceeded  deeper. 
The  hole/mold  narrowed  down  to  33  cm  x  40  cm 
at  its  base.  The  presumed  post  mold  actually 
consisted  of  olive  yellow  (2.5Y  6/6)  fine  sand  with 
small  gravel  and  pebbles;  the  fill  of  the  hole  was 
a  mottled  "strong"  brown  (7.5YR  5/8).  This  may 
have  been  a  post  hole  for  a  scaffolding  of  some 
kind,  perhaps  a  crude  trellis.  It  cut  into  feature 
44  (see  discussion  below),  which  may  account  for 
difficulties  over  definition  of  its  boundaries 
during  excavation.  Feature  38  may  also  have 
simply  been  a  planting  hole. 


Feature  39,  see  feature  16  discussion 


Feature  44,  6N6W,  8N6W:    Drain  pipe  trench 

This  feature  was  the  trench  dug  to  install  the 
drain  pipe  leading  from  the  downspout  drain 
box  (Feature  37)  around  the  corner  of  the  ell  and 
into  the  back  of  the  tenement.  The  fact  that  the 
trench  extended  this  far  was  not  recognized  until 
we  were  able  to  view  the  site  from  the  cherry 
picker  when  closing  photographs  were  taken. 
This  in  part  is  why  it  was  not  fully  excavated;  time 
constraints  would  not  have  permitted  full 
excavation  in  any  event.  The  trench  was  ca.  50 
cm  in  width;  the  excavated  portion  extended  for 
ca.  1.30  m  north-south,  parallel  to  the  rear  wall  of 
the  ell.  The  trench  fill  was  very  mixed,  but 
consisted  chiefly  of  a  dark  yellow  brown  sand 
with  gravel  and  pebbles.  It  also  contained  many 
artifacts,  including  glass  bottle  fragments, 
ceramics  and  pottery,  nails,  crown  bottle  caps, 
and  broken  ceramic  drain  pipe  fragments.  The 
drain  pipe  was  encountered  30  cm  below  grade; 
as  noted  above,  the  pipe  was  glazed  stoneware. 
A  hole  in  the  top  of  the  pipe  had  been  "patched" 
by  wedging  two  bricks  into  the  hole.  How 
effective  this  was  is  open  to  question. 


Features  40,   41,   lenses   that   proved   not   to   be 
features 


Feature  42:,  see  feature  29  discussion 


Feature  43,  8N6W:     Well 

This  circular  brick  well  had  an  inside  diameter 
of  91  cm.  Its  fill  was  excavated  to  a  depth  of  1.06 
cm  below  grade  in  arbitrary  20-cm  increments 
(levels  A,  B,  C,  D,  E).  The  matrix  was  a  mottled 
olive  grey  and  dark  yellow  brown  silty  sand.  It 
contained  a  fair  number  of  artifacts,  but  these 
amounted  to  nothing  when  compared  to  the 
artifact-laden  fill  of  the  well  behind  the 
boardinghouse  (feature  2,  described  in  Beaudry 
1987:  90-98).  A  lead  pipe  extended  down  into  the 
well  after  entering  it  ca.  50  cm  below  grade;  the 
pipe  fed  into  the  tenement  through  feature  34,  a 
brick  drain  box.  This  well  had  been  filled  with 
clean  fill  rather  than  the  refuse  and  coal  ash 
used  to  fill  feature  2.  Seemingly  this  is  evidence 
that  whoever  the  corporation  employed  to  fill  the 
tenement  well  abided  by  the  orders  of  the  Lowell 
Board  of  Health's  regulations  regarding  such  fill 
(cf.  Bell  1987a:  62) 


Feature  45,  4N0W,  4N2E:    Privy  vault 

This  stone-lined  privy  consisted  of  a  rectangle, 
ca.  1.90  m  x  2.50  m,  filled  with  coal  cinder, 
furnace  scale,  and  ash,  and  an  assortment  of 
early  20th-century  artifacts  as  well  as  large 
stones  pushed  in  during  demolition  of  the  upper 
portions  of  the  feature.  Two  cast-iron  vent  pipes 
emerged  from  the  depths  of  the  feature,  which 
also  had  a  large  wooden  support  beam  in  its 
northwest  corner.  It  was  excavated  in  three 
levels.  Level  A  was  the  coal  cinder  and  ash  from 
the  top  of  the  feature  down  to  70  cm  below  grade. 
Beneath  this  lay  many  large  blocks  and  orange 
grey  sand.  The  excavator  noted  that  the  fill  of 
coal  ash  appeared  to  be  interspersed  with 
household  sweepings.  The  wooden  post  may 
have  been  the  back  of  the  woodshed,  or  the 
support  for  the  rear  part  of  the  privy 
superstructure. 

Level  B  contained  ashlar  rubble,  large  slag 
and  cinder  fragments,  and  medium  brown  soil. 
One  concentration  of  cinders  in  the  northwest 
corner  contained  a  number  of  whole  whiskey 
bottles,  a  woman's  shoe  sole  fragment,  tar  paper, 
and  tin  can  fragments,  as  well  as  an  intact 
enamelled  tin  chamber  pot.  Level  C,  the  base  or 
bottom  of  the  privy,  encountered  at  2.10  m  below 
grade,  was  a  grey  sand  interbedded  with  grey  silt. 

Some  idea  of  the  appearance  of  such 
accommodations  as  this  Boott  privy  can  be 
gotten  by  examining  a  photograph  included  by 


74   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


* 


Figure  5-15.  Early  20th-century  photograph  of  the  interior  of  a  tenement  water  closet  in 
Lowell  worker  housing.  (Reproduced  from  Kenngott  1912.) 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    75 


Kenngott  in  The  Record  of  a  City  (1912;  Figure  5- 
15);  it  needs  no  commentary. 


Feature  46,  4N0W:    Bottle  dump  outside  privy 

Just  west  of  the  privy  foundation,  a  small  cache 
of  four  bottles  (Figure  7-1;  see  Chapter  7  for  a 
detailed  discussion  of  the  bottles)  was 
uncovered;  it  was  given  a  separate  feature 
designation.  It  would  appear  that  the  bottles 
had  been  deposited  in  a  hollow,  beneath  the 
floor  of  the  woodshed  or  under  a  step  leading 
into  the  privy  vault  chamber.  The  bottles  were  in 
a  triangular  area,  ca.  40  cm  x  1.26  cm  x  16  cm,  of 
dark  yellowish  brown  fine  sandy  loam  (10YR  4/6) 
with  very  dark  greyish  brown  mottles  (10YR  3/3) 
and  bits  of  decayed  wood.  The  feature  also 
produced  charcoal,  coal  ash,  oyster  shell, 
whiteware,  wire  nails,  two  buttons,  and  lamp 
chimney  and  window  glass. 


Feature  47,  8N0W:    Flat  stone  footings 

A  feature  number  was  given  to  a 
concentration  of  flat  stones  in  the  northeast 
corner  of  the  operation;  several  of  these  formed 
a  line  ca.  25  cm  wide  by  ca.  1.5  m  long.  These 
were  in  a  varied  matrix  of  dark  brown  sand  and 
silt  (10YR  3/3)  with  decayed  wood.  Presumably 
the  stones  had  formed  part  of  the  footings  for 
the  woodshed. 


Feature  49,  4N2W,  6N2W:    Rectilinear  pit 

This  elongated,  rectilinear  soil  stain  extended 
north-south  through  the  midline  of  units  4N2W 
and  6N2W.  The  south  1/3  was  bisected  and 
removed  in  an  attempt  to  learn  its 
function /purpose,  but  excavation  did  little  to 
shed  light  on  this.  The  feature  was  ca.  49  cm 
wide  by  ca.  1.16  m  long;  its  fill  was  very  mixed, 
hard  packed  for  the  first  20  cm,  loose  and 
crumbly  further  down.  It  consisted  of 
innumerable  small  lenses  that  looked  like 
shovels-full  thrown  in  from  a  mixed  back  dirt  pile 
or  the  like.  The  fill  seemed  sparse  in  artifacts, 
but  it  contained  window  glass,  clear  and  brown 
bottle  glass,  clear  lamp  chimney  glass,  nails, 
small  ceramic  sherds,  wood  fragments,  mortar, 
coal,  brick,  and  a  tin  can  (as  well  as  some  very 
large  boulders)  at  the  base  of  excavation. 
Excavation  was  halted  at  ca.  90  cm  below 
grade — this  did  not  appear  to  be  the  absolute 
bottom,  but  time  did  not  permit  further  work 
(and  the  excavator  could  reach  no  deeper  into 
the  pit,  even  with  the  long-handled  ladle  used  to 
remove  the  last  10  cm  of  fill). 


Operation     B 

Feature  50,  17N  6W:    Ell  Foundation 

This  feature  is  the  foundation  for  the 
boardinghouse  ell.  It  was  constructed  of  slate 
with  two  small  vent  holes  placed  in  the  north  and 
south  walls.  (Figures  5-9,  5-16).  The  vent  hole 
placed  in  the  southern  wall  of  the  foundation  was 
designated  Feature  52  because  it  contained  a 
number  of  shoe  fragments.  Although  there  is  a 
slight  curve  in  the  section  of  the  northern 
foundation  wall  closest  to  the  rear  wall  of  the 
boardinghouse  (Figure  5-16),  this  has  been 
interpreted  as  having  no  architectural 
significance  and  probably  represents  demolition 
activity.  The  overall  quality  of  construction  is 
markedly  different  than  that  characteristic  of  the 
boardinghouses  themselves.  The  original  plans 
for  the  boardinghouses  did  not  include  ells 
which  may  be  one  reason  for  the  difference  in 
construction  technique.  One  further  note  of 
interest  concerns  the  vent  holes.  Although  they 
provided  access  to  the  crawl  space  beneath  the 
ell,  this  included  unwanted  guests  such  as  rats. 
At  the  same  time  it  afforded  boardinghouse 
dwellers  with  a  convenient  storage  space  for 
secreting  items  such  as  liquor  bottles. 


Feature  51,  17N0W:    Party  wall 

Feature  51  is  the  remains  of  a  party  wall  which 
formed  the  southeastern  corner  of  unit  #45 
(Figures  5-9,  5-17).  The  wall,  which  was 
constructed  of  brick  and  mortar,  appears  in  the 
lower  right  corner  of  Figure  5-17. 


Feature    53,  19N10W,  21N10W:    Window  well 

Feature  53  was  a  small,  semicircular  window 
well  (Figure  5-9,  top  center  of  Figure  5-17).  It 
consisted  of  a  single  course  of  brick  and  appears 
to  have  been  poorly  mortared.  It  may  have 
served  as  a  source  of  light  for  the  boardinghouse 
cellar,  although  the  window  itself  was  bricked  up. 
This  may  have  been  because  of  the  introduction 
of  an  alternate  light  source  or  perhaps  as  a 
preventative  measure  against  pests  or  pilferers 
after  the  block  was  converted  to  a  warehouse.  It 
could  also  have  helped  with  drainage  in  the  rear 
yard. 


Feature  54,  21N10W:    Post  hole  (?) 

This  post  hole,  90  cm  x  60  cm  in  size,  was 
discovered  along  the  rear  wall  of  the 
boardinghouse  (Figure  5-9).  It  is  located  close  to 
feature  67,  which  may  be  a  planting  hole.    The 


76   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  5-16.  Feature  50,  an  ell  foundation  in  Operation  B.  A  line  of  stones  at  the  top  of 
the  photograph  may  have  been  part  of  previous  ell  foundation.  In  the  foreground  can 
be  seen  two  of  the  granite  sills  used  atop  the  boardinghouse  foundation.  The  darker 
areas  of  soil  in  this  photograph  are  indicative  of  the  highly  organic  nature  of  the 
deposits  in  this  backlot.  Camera  faces  east.  (Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.) 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    77 


Figure  5-17.  View  along  the  rear  wall  of  units  #45  and  44,  Operation  B.     Camera  faces 
south.  (Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.) 


78   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


feature  matrix  was  a  sandy  loam  similar  to  that 
found  throughout  the  rear  yard  area.  The 
feature  contained  a  number  of  artifacts 
including  pipestem  and  bowl  fragments  which 
appear  to  date  the  fill  to  the  late  19th  century.  It 
is  possible  that  the  feature  could  have  been  a 
small  planting  hole  or  supported  a  post. 


Feature  55,  23N10W:    Party  wall 

Feature  55  was  the  remains  of  a  party  wall  that 
would  have  divided  units  45  and  46.(Feature  5-9). 
It  was  constructed  of  slate  stone  and  mortar.  It 
was  rather  small  in  size,  measuring  only  40  x  70 
cm.  It  is  interesting  to  note  the  difference  in  the 
material  used  for  this  feature  and  feature  51, 
which  also  served  as  a  party  wall.  No  reason  for 
this  difference  or  whether  it  is  significant  can  be 
offered  at  this  time. 


matrix  consisted  of  coarse  sandy  loam,  light 
yellow-orange  in  color  with  traces  of  grey 
mottling.  Like  the  other  features  of  this  type  it  is 
unclear  whether  the  stones  associated  with  the 
post  hole  served  as  post  supports  or  merely 
represent  accumulated  debris.  Based  on  how 
common  this  association  is  across  the  backlot  it 
seems  plausible  to  conclude  that  the  stones 
served  at  least  a  casual  purpose. 


Feature    60,  21N0W,  19N0W:    Post 

Feature  60  (Figure  5-9)  was  the  remains  of  a 
wooden  post.  The  post  was  partially  intact,  but 
was  badly  decayed.  Its  location  suggests  it  was 
associated  with  the  rear  wall  of  the 
boardinghouse  woodshed,  but  it  could  also  have 
been  part  of  the  yard  fence. 


Feature  56,  19N0W:    Post  support 

Feature  56  consisted  of  a  circle  of  stones  that 
appears  to  have  helped  support  a  post  (Figure  5- 
9).  It  is  located  along  with  a  number  of  other 
features  that  may  be  associated  with  feature  61, 
the  boardinghouse  privy,  or  perhaps  with  the 
boardinghouse  woodshed.  The  post  hole  itself 
was  filled  with  a  fine,  silty  sand. 


Feature    57,  19N0W:    Post  support 

This  stone  post  support  is  located  in  the  same 
area  as  feature  56  (Figure  5-9)  and  appears  to 
have  served  a  similar  purpose. 

Feature  58,  19N0W:    Post  hole 

This  post  hole  was  found  in  the  same  area  as 
features  56  and  57  (Figure  5-9).  It  was  filled  with 
a  dark  black  soil  that  contained  slag  and  ash. 
This  material  is  probably  residue  of  the  period 
when  the  area  served  as  a  coal  yard.  Like  the 
features  discussed  above,  with  which  it  was 
associated,  it  would  appear  to  have  supported 
the  superstructure  of  either  the  boardinghouse 
privy  or  the  woodshed. 


Feature  61,  17N0W,  19N0W:    Privy  vault 

Feature  61  was  the  remains  of  the 
boardinghouse  privy  (Figure  5-9).  It  was 
constructed  of  slate  stones  and  when  fully 
exposed  measured  approximately  2.3  m  x  1 
m.(Figure  5-18).  In  addition  to  the  slate  stones 
the  feature  also  contained  several  pieces  of 
wood,  which  appear  to  have  been  associated  with 
the  privy's  use,  as  well  as  a  cast-iron  vent  pipe. 
The  soil  matrix  at  the  top  of  the  feature  was  a 
mixture  of  shades  of  gray  to  black.  The  dark 
coloration  of  the  soils  reflect  the  materials  used 
to  fill  the  privy  which  was  associated  with 
deposits  from  the  coal  yard  period  of  the  site. 
Three  primary  layers  of  fill  were  identified  in  the 
feature.1  Level  3  contained  coal  ash  and  slag 
that  contributed  to  the  dark  color  of  the  soils. 
Level  2,  which  was  separated  from  Level  3  by  a 
layer  of  wood,  consisted  of  a  mixture  of  soils  and 
decomposed  wood.  Level  1  consisted  of  glacial 
sand  below  the  privy  levels;  this  level,  however, 
was  not  excavated  except  for  pollen  samples, 
which  were  collected  from  the  level.  A  more 
detailed  description  of  each  level  is  provided 
below. 


Feature    59,  21N0W:    Post  support 

This  feature  is  located  directly  north  of 
features  56-58,  but  appears  to  be  associated  with 
them  (Figure  5-9).  The  feature  consists  of  a 
circle  of  stones  that  helped  to  support  a  post  that 
was  probably  one  of  the  structural  members  of 
the  boardinghouse   woodshed.      The   feature 


'During  actual  excavation  the  upper  most  levels  of 
Feature  61  and  all  other  features  and  individual  strata 
were  designated  Level  1.  However  pollen  samples  and 
Kelso's  description  of  the  results  are  discussed  in  reverse 
order  with  the  layer  deepest  from  the  surface  being 
designated  Level  1.  So  in  the  case  of  Feature  61,  the 
upper-most  layer  was  designated  Level  3  and  the  lowest 
layer  Level  1.  Therefore  for  the  purposes  of  the 
discussion  of  Feature  61  the  latter  system  will  be 
employed. 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    79 


Figure  5-18.  Feature  61,  the  Operation  B  privy,  when  first  uncovered.  The  blackened 
area  to  the  left  is  a  deposit  of  coal  dust;  the  stones  have  been  pushed  into  the  fill  of  the 
feature.     Camera  faces  north.  (Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.) 


80   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  5-19.  Feature  61  after  excavation,  looking  straight  down  into  the  privy  vault. 
Portions  of  a  wooden  box  or  internal  partition  can  be  seen  on  the  right;  at  the  top  is  a 
cast-iron  vent  pipe.     Camera  faces  west.  (Photograph  by  Paul  S.  Giblin.) 


Archeology  in  the  Backlots    81 


Feature  61,  level  3 

When  excavation  of  the  feature  began  the 
deposits  of  coal  ash  and  slag  were  thought  to  be 
an  ephemeral  layer,  however,  as  more  material 
was  removed  it  became  apparent  that  this  debris 
was  part  of  the  feature  fill.  In  addition  to  the  coal 
ash  and  slag  several  boulders  were  uncovered 
that  seem  to  have  been  part  of  the  privy 
foundation  wall.  It  was  clear  from  comparisons 
with  the  stones  that  comprised  the  intact 
portions  of  the  privy  foundation  that  the 
boulders  in  the  feature  fill  had  been  associated 
with  the  privy.  The  fill  from  the  layer  was 
dominated  by  coal  ash  and  slag,  but  also 
contained  a  fairly  large  sample  of  cultural 
material.  The  latter  included  ceramics  and 
glassware,  window  glass,  faunal  remains,  several 
iron  and  copper  objects,  and  some  clay  marbles. 

Level  3  was  rather  thin,  measuring  ca.  15-20 
cm  below  the  surface.  The  coal  ash  and  slag 
began  to  slacken  at  a  point  where  the  remains  of 
a  wooden  frame  were  discovered.  This  wood 
frame  appears  to  have  been  associated  with  the 
earliest  phase  of  the  privy's  use.  At  this  same 
point  there  was  a  distinctive  change  in  soil  color 
and  texture  from  a  dark  black  to  a  dark  grey- 
brown  coarse  sand  with  pebbles.  This  layer  was 
designated  level  2. 


Feature  61,  level  2 

The  interface  of  this  level  and  that  of  level  3 
was  marked  by  a  change  in  soil  color  and  texture 
and  the  presence  of  wood.  In  addition  to  the 
wooden  frame  discussed  above  there  were  also 
the  remains  of  several  wooden  planks.  The 
planks  appear  to  have  formed  a  cap  of  some 
kind  for  the  feature.  The  difference  between 
levels  3  and  2  was  quite  distinct  with  a  clear  drop 
in  cultural  material  in  level  2  as  compared  with 
the  previous  level.  The  level  itself  was  mottled 
with  more  pebbles  and  gravel  located  in  the 
eastern  portion  of  the  feature. (Figure  5-19). 
Next  to  the  air  vent  there  was  a  small  pocket  of 
fine  sand  which  extended  to  ca.  60-70  cm  below 
the  surface.  Further  pieces  of  wood  were  found 
at  this  point.  Although  pollen  samples  were 
collected  from  this  layer,  designated  level  1, 
excavation  ended  with  the  bottom  of  level  2 
(Figure  5-19). 

It  would  appear  that  both  levels  3  and  2  are 
fills  dating  to  different  cleaning  episodes  with 
the  former  representing  the  post-1910  period 
when  the  feature  went  out  of  use.  Based  on 
observations  made  in  the  field  it  was  unclear 
whether  level  2,  which  appears  to  be  the  primary 
occupation-period  layer,  contained  any  fecai 
related    soils.       Parasitological    and    plant 


macrofossil  analysis  (see  Chapter  12)  do  provide 
some  evidence  which  indicates  there  may  have 
been  some  fecal  material  as  part  of  residue  left 
when  the  feature  was  cleaned  out. 


Feature  62,  19N4W:    Brick  paving 

This  feature  appears  to  be  the  remains  of 
brick  paving  or  pathway  that  would  have  run 
through  the  center  of  the  backlot.  It  may  have 
served  those  using  the  woodshed  and  privy  or 
just  as  an  all-purpose  walkway.  As  illustrated  in 
Figure  5-9,  it  seems  to  have  been  disturbed  by 
the  construction  of  the  large  lamp  post,  although 
the  portion  to  the  north  of  the  post  appears  to 
have  retained  some  integrity.  The  presence  of 
such  a  feature  would  certainly  be  in  keeping  with 
the  image  provided  by  photographic  evidence 
that  indicates  mud  would  have  been  a  constant 
problem  in  board inghouse  backlots. 


Feature  63,  17N4W:    Post  support 

This  feature  consisted  of  a  flat,  square  rock 
that  appears  to  have  served  as  a  support  for  one 
of  the  woodshed's  corner  posts  (Figure  5-9). 

Feature  64,  23N10W,  23N12W:    Brick  paving 

Feature  64  appears  to  the  remains  of  another 
brick  paving  (Figures  5-9,  5-17).  It  is  located 
directly  outside  the  rear  door  of  the 
boardinghouse  and  may  even  have  been 
connected  at  some  point  with  Feature  62. 

Feature  65,    21N8W:    Pit  or  planting  hole 

This  rectangular  pit  was  first  located  during 
our  initial  investigations  of  the  boardinghouse 
backlots  (Beaudry  and  Mrozowski  1987a).  At 
that  time  it  was  designated  feature  8.  During  the 
more  recent  phase  of  excavation  the  feature  was 
more  clearly  defined  as  a  small  pit  associated 
with  Kirk  Boott's  occupation  of  the  site  (Figure 
5-9).  The  pit  is  approximately  1  m  x  50  cm  in 
size.  The  feature  matrix  consisted  of  very  mixed 
yellow-brown  sand  with  traces  of  grey  sand  as 
well.  It  contained  four  different  layers,  all  of 
which  well  relatively  mottled.  It  may  have 
initially  served  as  a  planting  hole  in  Kirk  Boott's 
garden.  Based  on  the  ceramics  and  other 
material  recovered  from  the  feature,  it  clearly 
dates  to  the  pre-boardinghouse  occupation. 
This  is  further  confirmed  by  pollen  analysis  (see 
Chapter  12). 


82    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 

Feature    66,  19N4W,  21N4W:    Post  support 

This  feature  appears  identical  to  Feature  63.  It 
is  a  flat,  square  stone  that  probably  functioned 
as  a  corner  post  support  for  the  boardinghouse 
woodshed  (Figure  5-9).  Its  proximity  to  feature 
62  also  lends  support  to  the  interpretation  of  this 
feature  as  a  walkway  to  the  shed. 


Feature  67,  2W8W,  21N10W,  19N8W:    Planting 
hole 

This  triangular  feature  ca.  50  x  50  cm  in  size 
appears  to  have  been  a  planting  hole.  The 
feature  matrix  consisted  of  dark  brown  sand  that 
contained  cultural  material  including  ceramic 
and  glass  fragments.  The  feature  also  contained 
several  badly  corroded  iron  artifacts.  It  is 
curiously  similar  to  feature  27  in  Operation  A, 
which  also  appears  to  have  functioned  as  a 
planting  hole.  This  is  based  on  the  general 
shape  of  the  feature  and  its  orientation  to  the 
rear  wall  of  the  boardinghouse. 


both  also  were  softened  somewhat  by  plantings 
of  some  sort. 

The  excavations  did  give  us  a  plan  view  of 
each  yard — at  least  of  its  archeological  plan. 
These,  and  the  sampled  and  excavated  features, 
begin  to  tell  the  story  of  workers'  lives  in  the 
Boott  boardinghouses,  but  we  must  turn  to  the 
detailed  analysis  of  material  culture  and 
environmental  data  in  the  chapters  that  follow  in 
order  to  gain  a  more  genuine  and  lively  picture 
of  what  the  archeological  record  can  tell  us. 


Summary 

Although  the  backlots  explored  in  Operations 
A  and  B  contained  essentially  the  same 
complement  of  features,  there  were  many 
differences  between  the  two.  Both  backlots 
showed  the  effects  of  razing  and  subsequent 
uses  (coal  yard,  parking  lot)  to  a  greater  or  lesser 
degree,  with  perhaps  most  damage  having  been 
done  to  Operation  A,  although  large  sections  of 
Operation  B  seem  to  have  been  gouged  out 
during  coal  loading  and  unloading. 

Yard  deposits  in  Operation  B,  however, 
seemed  much  more  intact,  although  there  was 
little  opportunity  to  explore  these.  Operation  B 
turned  up  considerably  more  refuse  and 
possibly  held  more  planting  holes.  Naturally,  as 
a  boardinghouse  yard  used  heavily  by  large 
numbers  of  people  over  a  long  period  of  time,  it 
would  have  likely  accumulated  more  refuse  than 
a  tenement  yard.  The  latter  was  occupied  in  the 
main  by  single  families  rather  than  by  unrelated 
groups,  a  factor  that  may  have  contributed  in 
part  to  relative  yard  tidiness.  The  tenement  well 
had  been  filled  with  comparatively  clean  fill,  and 
the  privy  contained  coal  ash  but  no  genuine 
privy  deposits.  In  Operation  B,  the  fill  of  the  well 
was  replete  with  household  trash,  and  the  privy 
did  have  remnants  of  fecal  matter  left  after  its 
last  cleaning.  Trashy  deposits  were  common 
here,  and  there  is  a  fair  amount  of  evidence  of 
attempts  to  provide  firm  footing  in  the  way  of 
brick  paving  and  so  forth.  Both  yards  may  have 
been  unkempt,  with  weeds  at  their  margins,  but 


Chapter  6 

'THRASHER'S  CHINA"  OR  "COLORED  PORCELAIN":  CERAMICS  FROM 
A  BOOTT  MILLS  BOARDINGHOUSE  AND  TENEMENT 

by  David  H.  Dutton 


Introduction 

An  ever-growing  body  of  research  in  American 
historical  archeology  has  focused  on  the  task  of 
correlating  archeological  patterns  with 
behavioral  distinctions  among  different 
socioeconomic  strata  (Deagan  1982:  163-167; 
Geismar  1982;  Otto  1984;  Paynter  1982).  Because 
refined  ceramic  wares  are  especially  sensitive  to 
sociotechnic  dimensions,  they  are  often  the  most 
commonly  used  artifact  type  in  status  studies  in 
historical  archeology.  Other  artifact  groups  such 
as  drinking  glass,  silverware,  silverplate,  and 
clothing  accessories  have  also  been  used  in 
efforts  to  determine  the  socioeconomic  level  of  a 
household.  It  is,  however,  the  mere  quality  and 
variety  of  ceramics  found  at  a  historical  site  that 
makes  them  a  reliable  indicator  of  a  household's 
relative  economic  level  (Miller  and  Stone  1970: 
98). 

Ceramic  vessels  assume  a  wide  variety  of 
forms,  and  a  careful  analysis  of  these  forms  will 
yield  information  regarding  a  vessel's  function  in 
food  processing,  preparation,  consumption,  and 
other  foodways  related  activities.  With  any 
ceramic  vessel  serving  in  a  foodways  function, 
the  quality,  decoration,  and  price  are  related  to 
the  ability  of  the  household  to  afford  them,  as 
well  as  to  the  function  of  the  vessels  in  displaying 
social  status  to  guests  on  occasions  such  as  tea 
or  dinner. 

The  purpose  then  of  this  study  is  to  identify 
and  determine  those  patterns  associated  with 
ceramic  purchase,  use,  and  discard  that  are  a 
result  of  household  composition,  and 
socioeconomic  status.  The  ceramic  vessel 
assemblages  from  a  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse 
and  tenement  backlot  will  provide  the  basis  for 
this  analysis. 


Ceramics  in   Socioeconomic  Studies 

The  patterns  associated  with  the  purchase  of 
ceramics  by  the  consumer  from  the  wide  variety 
of  wares  available  in  the  market  economy  are 
frequently  among  the  major  cultural  processes 
responsible  for  the  formation  of  the 
archeological  record  (Schiffer  1977).  The  19th- 
century  market  economy  was  a  significant 
cultural  subsystem  that  affected  the  acquisition 


of  household  ceramics  as  well  as  the  frequency 
of  use  and  selective  discard  of  the  ceramic  wares 
(Spencer-Wood  and  Heberling  1987:  56).  The 
differences  in  price  frequently  affected  the 
quality  of  consumer  goods  that  a  household 
could  afford,  and  it  was  this  relationship  that  can 
be  associated  to  socioeconomic  status. 
Research  in  anthropological  archeology  has 
sought  to  link  the  unequal  distribution  of  goods 
among  sites  to  the  economic  and  social 
differentiation  within  the  society  (Hodder  and 
Orton  1979:  183-197;  Rathje  1971;  Sabloff  and 
Rathje  1975).  Further,  economic  anthropologists 
and  archeologists  agree  that  social  status 
differences  that  are  a  result  of  economic  roles 
are  major  factors  in  unequal  access  to  goods 
(Clark  1969:  217;  Douglas  and  Isherwood  1979: 
25). 

The  underlying  assumption  of  ceramic 
economic  scaling  studies  is  that  members  of  a 
household  will  only  purchase  ceramics  that 
reflect  their  relative  socioeconomic  level.  As 
with  all  assumptions,  caution  must  be  exercised, 
as  the  initial  findings  in  the  data  may  not  always 
be  valid.  For  instance,  a  particular  household 
may  not  choose  to  display  its  wealth  by 
purchasing  and  using  more  expensive  ceramics. 
Likewise,  the  socioeconomic  level  of  a  household 
is  not  static  and  may  be  subject  to  frequent 
changes  over  a  relatively  short  period  of  time. 
Here  the  risk  lies  in  assigning  a  relative  value  to 
a  collection  that  actually  reflects  the  previous 
rather  than  current  socioeconomic  level  of  the 
household  being  studied  (Garrow  1987:  218). 

It  must,  however,  always  be  remembered  that 
the  price  or  value  of  the  ceramic  item  is  only  one 
factor  that  is  involved  in  the  complex  web  of 
consumer  choices.  The  actual  cost  of  the 
ceramics  should  be  considered  a  minimum 
criterion,  but  knowing  whether  or  not  a  site's 
occupants  had  the  wherewithal  to  purchase 
transfer  printed  wares  and  teawares  does  not  tell 
us  enough  about  peoples'  choices,  restrictions, 
and,  ultimately,  how  they  lived  (Leone  and 
Crosby  1987: 402). 


83 


84    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


19th-century  Tableware 

The  most  commonly  used  items  in  a 
household  would  have  been  ceramic  vessels 
employed  in  the  preparation,  service,  and 
consumption  of  food.  By  the  19th  century, 
women  had  a  wide  variety  of  choices  available 
for  dinner  sets  and  other  dining  room 
furnishings  (see  Mrozowski  1988  for  a  discussion 
of  the  assumed  link  between  women  and 
ceramic  purchase  in  19th-century  America).  In 
fact,  just  choosing  the  type  of  ware  and  number 
of  pieces  needed  to  set  a  table  could  often  prove 
to  be  quite  a  task.  For  women  who  were 
purchasing  ceramics  with  limited  financial 
means,  the  experience  could  be  particularly 
trying.  Indeed,  "shopping,  especially  to  those  for 
whom  a  purchase  represented  months  of  saving, 
could  be  a  treacherous  adventure"  (Williams 
1985: 59). 

Different  sets  of  tableware  were  made 
available  by  manufacturers  in  order  to  fill  the 
needs  of  various  dining  situations.  A  typical 
family's  tableware  for  the  last  half  of  the  19th 
century  would  have  included  settings  for  dinner, 
tea,  breakfast,  and  dessert  (Williams  1985:  80). 
By  the  mid-19th  century,  the  array  of 
components  comprising  a  dinner  set  was 
relatively  standardized  regardless  of  the  ware. 
The  number  of  pieces  purchased,  however, 
would  have  differed  from  family  to  family  as 
economic  means,  family  size,  and  personal 
preferences  would  have  more  than  likely 
governed  such  decisions. 

A  typical  dinner  setting  is  probably 
represented  in  a  purchase  made  by  Captain 
Richard  H.  Tucker  of  Wiscasset,  Maine,  in 
November  of  1858.  His  dinnerware  consisted  of 
11/2  dozen  dinner  plates,  11/2  dozen  breakfast 
plates,  11/2  dozen  tea  plates,  1  dozen  soup 
plates,  2  sauce  tureens,  2  sauce  boats,  1  soup 
tureen,  4  oval  covered  vegetable  dishes  (2  sizes), 
7  oval  meat  dishes  (assorted  sizes),  1  round 
pudding  dish,  2  oval  deep  dishes,  1  butter  plate, 
1  dozen  custards,  and  1  gravy  dish  (Williams 
1985:  82).  The  variety  and  sizes  of  dinnerware 
available  to  consumer  was  indeed  great  and  is 
further  illustrated  by  a  1920  catalog  entry  for  the 
Homer  Laughlin  China  Company  of  East 
Liverpool,  Ohio,  listing  common  and  trade  shape 
names.  Among  the  entries  are  listed  five  types 
of  plates,  ranging  in  size  from  four  inches  to 
eight  inches,  two  types  of  soup  plates,  four  forms 
of  vegetable  dishes,  pitchers,  and  gravy  boats 
(Gates  and  Ormerod  1982:  9). 

By  the  1850s,  tableware  services  were  larger 
and  more  functionally  specific  than  ever  before. 
Technological  innovations  in  the  ceramic 
industry,    such    as    mechanically    decorating 


earthenwares  by  means  of  transfer  printing, 
dramatically  lowered  the  price  of  tableware 
while  at  the  same  time  increasing  the  range  both 
of  form  and  decoration.  Because  of  the  ceramic 
industry's  expanded  production  capabilities  and 
distribution  networks,  the  last  half  of  the  19th 
century  was  characterized  by  a  wide  selection  of 
dinner,  tea,  glass,  and  flatware  services  that  were 
available  to  all  socioeconomic  levels. 


The  Archeology  of  19th-century  Ceramics 

With  the  advent  of  the  19th  century  came  a 
series  of  developments  in  the  ceramic  industry 
that  forced  potters  and  ceramic  merchants  to 
attend  less  to  ware-type  in  describing  their 
products.  The  standardization  of  the 
manufacturing  process  reduced  the  distinctions 
that  could  be  made  among  glazes  and  pastes. 
The  differences  among  the  wares  manufactured 
were  practically  unobservable  compared  to 
earlier  periods.  Furthermore,  unlike  their  earlier 
counterparts,  who  could  refer  to  ceramics  by 
ware  types  and  their  various  subdivisions  without 
confusion,  19th-century  potters  and  wholesalers 
marketed  their  ceramics  on  the  basis  of 
decoration — chiefly  because  greater  effort  and 
expense  was  now  invested  in  decorating  than  in 
producing  pots — moreso  than  by  other 
characteristics  (Miller  1980). 

Many  of  the  systems  used  to  categorize  and 
analyze  19th-century  ceramics  are  derived  from, 
if  not  directly  related  to,  ware-based  systems  of 
classification.  Miller  (1980)  notes  that  because 
researchers  in  the  1960s  were  concerned 
predominantly  with  17th-  and  18th-century  sites, 
the  analysis  of  ceramics  was  dependent  on  a 
division  based  on  ware  types,  which  separated 
ceramics  into  earthenwares,  stonewares,  and 
porcelain.  These  groups  were  further 
subdivided  according  to  contemporary 
terminology  used  by  manufacturers,  merchants, 
and  consumers.  For  example,  earthenware 
would  have  encompassed  creamware, 
pearlware,  and  Rockingham  ware,  to  mention 
just  a  few.  It  was,  therefore,  natural  for 
archeologists  working  on  19th-century  sites  to 
extend  the  use  of  ware-based  classificatory 
schemes  to  the  analysis  of  ceramic  materials 
they  recovered  (Miller  1980:  2;  Majewski  and 
O'Brien  1987: 105). 

Aside  from  changes  in  production,  the  most 
obvious  and  oftentimes  least  dealt  with  problem 
in  ware-based  classification  systems  is  the 
disagreement  by  archeologists  over  the 
definitions  of  ware  such  as  pearlware,  whiteware, 
and  ironstone  (Majewski  and  O'Brien  1987:  105). 
Miller  further  illustrates  this  point  when  he 


Ceramic  Analysis    85 


states,  "if  an  assemblage  of  ceramics  from  the 
first  half  of  the  19th  century  is  placed  before  six 
archaeologists  and  they  are  asked  for  counts  of 
cream  ware,  pearl  ware,  whiteware,  and  stone 
china  wares,  the  results  will  probably  be  six 
different  enumerations"  (Miller  1980:  2).  The 
reference  here  is  to  early  19th<entury  ceramics; 
one  could  only  imagine  the  outcome  of  such  an 
exercise  with  late  19th-  and  early  20th-century 
wares. 

In  response  to  a  need  for  a  more  effective 
classification  scheme  for  19th-century  ceramics, 
Miller  (1980)  developed  a  decoration-based 
system  of  analysis.  Because  of  his  interests  in 
economic  and  status-related  issues,  Miller 
developed  a  four-level  classification  system  that 
was  arranged  in  increasing  order  by  consumer 
cost.  Characteristics  were  determined  by 
examining  19th-century  price  fixing  lists, 
account  books,  bills  of  lading,  and  newspapers, 
in  order  to  understand  how  ceramics  were 
marketed.  By  using  documented  prices  of 
ceramic  vessels,  "cream-colored-index  values" 
were  created  enabling  the  researcher  to 
calculate  the  relative  cost  of  an  item  above  that 
of  cream-colored  vessels.  This,  in  turn,  allows 
the  assemblage  to  be  scaled  in  terms  of 
expenditure  on  ceramics. 

Decoration-based  systems,  however,  are  not 
without  their  own  problems.  Rarely  does  an 
archeologist  recover  a  complete  vessel  from  an 
excavated  site.  Fragments  that  researchers  deal 
with  represent  only  a  small  portion  of  the 
original  vessel.  Frequently  only  the  undecorated 
sections  of  a  vessel  are  recovered,  lowering  the 
mean  ceramic  assemblage  value  when  in  reality 
it  ought  to  be  somewhat  higher.  Likewise, 
decoration-based  schemes  cannot  account  for 
undecorated  vessels  such  as  semivitreous  white- 
bodied  wares  (ironstone)  and  vessels  that  have 
at  most  an  unpainted  band  of  relief  decoration 
around  the  rim.  By  1850,  ironstone  wares  were 
considered  equal  in  price  to  transfer  printed 
vessels.  Creation  of  another  level  in  Miller's 
decoration  hierarchy  would  therefore  be 
necessary  for  assemblages  post-ca.  1850.  A 
second  weakness  is  a  result  of  the  fact  that  19th- 
and  early  20th-century  ceramics  were  frequently 
marketed  by  decoration  in  addition  to  ware  or 
pattern  (Henry  and  Garrow  1982a:  323). 

Miller's  (1980)  argument  that  ware-based 
systems  of  classification  are  useful  only  in 
examining  social  and  economic  aspects  of  pre- 
1800  ceramic  assemblages  is  widely  accepted, 
and  his  method  for  categorizing  19th-century 
vessels  according  to  decoration  has  met  with 
increased  usage.  Problems  arise,  however,  when 
analyzing  assemblages  from  the  second  half  of 


the  19th  century.  The  appearance  and 
popularity  of  undecorated  white  wares  after  1850 
makes  a  dependence  solely  on  Miller's  system 
unreliable. 

Considerable  debate  has  centered  around  the 
definition  of  the  category  whiteware.  Several 
researchers  have  tried  to  develop  an  objective 
means  for  distinguishing  among  the  white 
earthenwares  (Lofstrom  et  al.  1982;  Henry  and 
Garrow  1982a;  Worthy  1982)  while  others  such  as 
Gates  an  Ormerod  (1982:  7)  and  South  (1977) 
have  elected  to  use  the  term  "whiteware"  to 
refer  to  any  type  of  pottery  or  porcelain  that  is 
white  or  nearly  white  in  color.  Because  of 
technological  improvements  in  the  ceramic 
industry,  white-bodied  ceramics  came  to  coexist 
throughout  the  19th  and  into  the  20th  century 
with  nonvitreous-  and  semivitreous-bodied 
earthenwares.  Ceramic      body      types 

manufactured  during  this  time  period  merely 
reflect  points  along  a  continuum  of  ceramic 
body  development.  To  make  a  fine-grained 
distinction  would  simply  compound  the 
problems  archeologists  have  in  identifying  and 
analyzing  19th-century  ceramics.  Therefore,  for 
the  purposes  of  ware-type  divisions,  ironstone, 
nonvitreous,  and  semivitreous  wares  were  all 
grouped  in  a  category  labelled  white 
earthenware. 

For  this  study  it  was  deemed  best  to  use  a 
combination  of  both  the  ware-  and  decoration- 
based  systems  of  classification.  For  heuristic 
purposes,  ceramics  recovered  from  the  Boott 
Mills  excavations  were  first  grouped  according 
to  ware  type  (e.g.,  pearlware,  creamware, 
whiteware,  stoneware,  yellow  ware,  red  ware, 
porcelain,  etc.)  and  then  by  decoration  which 
was  based  on  an  analyses  of  the  vessel  surface. 
Any  form  of  human  alteration,  such  as  molding, 
inscribing,  handpainting,  glazing,  or  transfer 
printing,  etc.,  were  classified  as  forms  of  ceramic 
vessel  decoration.  Vessels  exhibiting  similar 
characteristics  were  grouped  accordingly.  These 
categories  were  analyzed  in  an  attempt  to  arrive 
at  conclusions  concerning  household 
composition,  socioeconomic  behavior,  and 
purchasing  patterns  for  the  boardinghouse  and 
tenement. 


The  Homelot  as  a  Unit  of  Analysis 

The  basic  unit  of  archeological  excavation  is 
often  the  houselot  associated  with  a  domestic 
structure  and  its  related  outbuildings.  The 
majority  of  artifacts  recovered  archeologically 
from  primary  deposits  in  a  houselot  fenced  in  or 
separated  from  adjacent  structures  and  activity 
areas  can  reasonably  be  assumed  to  have  been 


86   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


deposited  by  the  residents  of  the  house  that 
controlled  the  yard  (Deagan  1982:  161). 
Therefore,  it  stands  to  reason  that  some  of  the 
ceramics  used  by  the  residents  may  have  been 
lost  or  discarded  in  the  yard  while  some 
materials  may  have  been  deposited  elsewhere 
by  the  household.  The  ceramics  recovered 
archeologically,  however,  will  at  best  represent 
only  a  partial  sample  of  the  ceramics  used  in  the 
household.  In  addition  to  the  archeological 
biases  attributable  to  the  recovery  methods 
employed,  some  ceramics  may  remain  in  the 
cultural  system  of  a  household  for  a  longer 
period  of  time  than  others,  further  skewing  the 
sample.  Vessels  may  be  transplanted  to  other 
locations  in  the  cultural  system  through  such 
mechanisms  as  recycling,  inheritance,  gift- 
giving,  barter,  and  resale  (Spencer-Wood  and 
Heberling  1987:  57). 

The  archeological  materials  that  are 
recovered  and  associated  with  a  particular 
structure  can  usually  be  related  to  the  collective 
behavior  of  all  the  residents  of  the  house  in  one 
time  period.  The  behavior  of  any  subdivisions  of 
either  economic  or  social  units  within  a 
household  may  prove  difficult  if  not  impossible 
to  determine,  however.  These  smaller  economic 
or  social  units  that  comprise  the  household 
include  servants,  boarders,  or  multiple  families. 
The  accepted  definition  of  a  household,  in 
archeological  terms,  is  a  "co-resident  domestic 
group"  that  is  made  up  of  those  individuals  who 
occupy  and  share  the  same  physical  space  for 
the  activities  of  eating,  sleeping,  taking  rest  and 
leisure,  growing  up,  childbearing,  and 
procreating  (Beaudry  1984a:  1). 

Many  forms  of  household  composition  can  be 
identified  by  the  types  of  relationships,  both 
economic  and  social,  that  are  found  to  exist 
among  the  members  of  the  household  group 
(LeeDecker  et  al.  1987:  236).  In  19th-century 
urban  America  the  most  commonly  found 
household  types  were  the  nuclear  family 
household,  the  extended  family  household,  the 
augmented  family  household,  the 
boardinghouse,  and  the  solitary  individual 
household  (LeeDecker  et  al.  1987:  236). 

The  practice  of  boarding  individuals  was 
widespread  in  the  late  19th  century  in  both  rural 
and  urban  settings.  Research  conducted  by 
Modell  and  Hareven  (1977)  has  demonstrated 
that  for  American  families,  approximately  one  in 
every  five  urban  households  took  in  boarders 
during  the  period  1860  to  1920.  Boarding  soon 
became  associated  with  lower-class  immigrants, 
and,  by  the  turn  of  the  century,  the  progressive 
moralists  had  labeled  it  as  "the  lodger  evil,"  as 
middle  class  values  became   more   stringent 


(Modell  and  Hareven  1977:  165-166).  In  essence, 
the  boardinghouse  system  brought  about  the 
commercialization  of  the  household  (cf.  Landon, 
Chapter  4,  this  volume). 


Corporate  Housing  in  Lowell 

Two  types  of  housing  were  provided  for  the 
operatives  by  the  corporation:  boardinghouses 
and  tenements.  Boardinghouses  provided  room 
and  board  for  the  single  male  and  female 
operatives  at  the  mill.  Run  by  keepers  hired  by 
the  mill  agents,  boardinghouses  provided  a 
means  for  the  corporations  to  extend  company 
supervision  and  discipline  of  workers  outside  the 
mill  into  the  home  (Dublin  1979:  76).  Tenement 
housing  was  offered  to  skilled  workers  and  their 
families,  as  well  as  to  households  with  two  or 
more  individuals  employed  in  the  mills.  In 
addition  to  providing  shelter,  tenement  housing 
served  to  keep  skilled  workers  housed  close  to 
the  mills  in  relatively  inexpensive  housing,  in 
turn  reducing  the  chances  of  employees  seeking 
more  convenient  employment  (Anonymous 
1888:  315). 

Boardinghouses  were  operated  mostly  by 
widows  or  older  women  with  young  children.  It 
was  their  duty  to  enforce  strict  company  policies 
on  behavior  in  the  boardinghouses  such  as  the 
10  p.m.  curfew,  required  church  attendance  on 
Sunday,  and  the  prohibition  of  smoking  and 
gambling  (Hareven  1982:  55).  In  Lowell,  as  well 
as  other  industrial  towns,  the  boardinghouse 
keeper  was  often  regarded  as  a  surrogate  parent 
and  the  operatives  as  minor  children  (Dublin 
1979:  79).  In  this  way  the  keepers,  and  in  turn  the 
corporations,  sought  to  assure  young  women 
workers  and  their  parents  that  the 
boardinghouses  mirrored  and  observed  the 
values  that  parents  guarded  in  rural  life. 

In  addition  to  maintaining  order  and  harmony 
within  the  boardinghouse,  keepers  were 
required  to  obtain  all  of  the  necessary  articles  for 
furnishing  and  operating  the  establishment. 
Purchases  for  the  boardinghouse  would  have 
been  made  by  the  keeper,  or  her  domestics,  and 
would  have  included  furniture,  food,  tableware, 
and  other  numerous  household  articles.  The 
economic  limitations  placed  upon  a  keeper 
needing  to  make  these  purchases  for  outfitting  a 
boardinghouse  might  have  been  met  by 
purchasing  items  in  bulk  or  by  renting 
furnishings  (Bond  1987:  40).  There  were  several 
purchasing  options  available  to  the  new 
boardinghouse  keeper,  or  one  needing  to 
replace  damaged,  broken,  or  missing  items.  She 
could  purchase  articles  that  were  damaged  in 
transport,  out  of  fashion,  or  odd  pieces  of  an 


Ceramic  Analysis    87 


incomplete  set,  such  as  that  advertised  in  the 
Lowell  Sunday  Arena  on  February  12,  1893. 
French  &  Puffer,  an  establishment  operating  in 
Lowell  as  early  as  1878,  was  listed  in  the  Lowell 
business  directory  as  dealers  of  crockery,  china, 
and  glassware  (Lowell  Directory  1878,  1888).  The 
firm  was  located  at  127-131  Central  Street.  Its 
advertisement  for  the  sale  of  odd  pieces  stresses 
a  great  opportunity  for  restaurants  and 
boardinghouse  keepers  to  acquire  or  replenish  a 
set  of  ceramic  ware  (Figure  6-1).  In  the  same 
paper,  A.  G.  Pollard  &  Co.,  located  at  Merrimack, 
Palmer,  and  Middle  Streets,  advertised  the  sale 
of  damaged  quilts  (Figure  6-2).  The 
merchandise  was  displayed  in  the  basement, 
and  housekeepers,  hotel  keepers,  and 
boardinghouse  keepers  were  urged  to  take 
advantage  of  the  specials.  Clearly  businesses  in 
Lowell  were  aware  of  the  economic  constraints 
under  which  boardinghouse  keepers  were 
operating.  The  newspaper  ads  suggest  that,  in 
addition  to  purchasing  or  renting  items  in  bulk, 
boardinghouse  keepers  bought  and  replenished 
their  stock  with  factory  seconds  or  leftover 
merchandise.  Local  merchants  encouraged  this 
practice  through  direct  appeal  to  boardinghouse 
keepers  in  their  newspaper  ads. 

Tenement  dwellers  presumably  led  lives  like 
other  "normal"  nuclear  families  and  thus 
seldom  attracted  the  attention  of  19th-century 
writers  so  keen  to  document  boardinghouse  life. 
Most  working-class  families,  however,  lived  in 
poverty  or  near  poverty  and  the  economic 
survival  of  the  family  frequently  depended  on 
the  contributions  of  individual  members  and  the 
marshalling  of  collective  family  resources 
(Hareven  1982:  189).  It  was  quite  common  for 
children  to  work  and  to  contribute  most  of  their 
earnings  to  the  family.  In  fact,  a  survey  of 
several  New  England  textile  towns  revealed  that 
this  was  the  predominant  pattern  throughout  the 
industry  (Hareven  1982: 189).  The  key  to  survival 
for  working-class  families,  such  as  those  who 
lived  in  the  Boott  Mills  tenements,  was 
interdependence  and  a  collective  effort.  Thus, 
the  economic  strategy  of  the  family  often  took 
precedence  over  individual  choices  and 
priorities.  A  brief  examination  of  the  census 
data  from  tenement,  unit  #48  (Bond  1987: 
Appendix  B)  illustrates  that  unlike  most 
working-class  mill  families,  the  residents  from 
unit  #48  had  few  children  who  were  eligible  for 
the  work  force.  It  is  possible  that  the  wives  of  the 
respective  families  worked  but  these  data  are 
unavailable.  On  the  whole,  the  residents  of  the 
tenement  had  one  primary  income,  that  of  the 
husband,  thus,  limiting  the  purchasing  power  of 
the  household. 


ODD  PIECES. 


We    have    u    •mall    quantity  of  odd 

Sieces  of  Crockery,  nmt  beloojring  to 
Inner  m-ts,  and  odds  and  ends  of  other 
kinds  They  are  all  desirable,  and  will 
help  out  ii  broken  eat  in  fine  shape. 
Here'b  » 

Great  Chance  1#  Restaurants 
or  Boarding-House  Keepers. 

Tea  Plates,  5c. 
Breakfast  Plates,  6c. 
Dinner  Plates,  7c. 

Thia  is  cheaper  than  the  white  ware 
can  be  bought  for,  and  besides  these  odd 
pieces  are  all  excellent  quality,  nicely 
decorated  and  fine  shape*.  They  cannot 
be  duplicated  in  this  city  or  elsewhere 
for  these  prices.  In  the  lot  are 
•* 

Cops,  Saucers,  Dishes 

Of.  various  kinds,  and  other  thing*  of 
value.  •  Tbey  are  all  put  into  the  low 
price  list  for  next  week. 

Anyone  who  keeps  house,  and  espe- 
cially owners  of  restaurants,  boarding- 
houses,  etc.,  should  not  let  thia  oppor- 
tunity slip.  . 

French  &  Puller, 

127  to  W  C'Ptra!  Strut. 


Figure  6-1.  French  &  Puffer  advertisement  from 
Lowell  Sunday  Arena  February  12,  1893. 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


A.G.POLLARD&CO. 


BASEMENT    DEPARTMENT. 

ANOTHER    LARGE   LOT 

DAMAGED  QUILTS. 

TO   BE  OFFERED  ON 

Tuesday,    February    14th,    1893. 


Nearly  lfiOO  White  Toilet  wullta,  -very-one  slightly  damagwd  Id  mmo- 
(adoring  by  tonae  Irregularity  in  the  machinery  They  eobntcw  20  different 
frmdee   and    will    bw   aold    »t    pnm    r»ug"  .*    froro 

49  Cents  to  $2.29  Each. 

They   are   all     Full    Strength    and  Full    Hue,  »nd    the   d  image    ii    of    eurh 

nature  an  will  not  in  anyway  affect  their  durability  and  id  many  lortaoL-ea 
ii    if    hardly    noiicrsble 

WV   «ha ■'      [--n    "lem  on   T-ii*« lay  M'<t iiinw,  nnl,  In    mr    ffewMoeni    V>- ^H 


.ut 


k. 


Street    n.tnmcee       H  ■■■j»-    Keeper*.    Hutel     1-oepvn.    Li'Mtrdiiigbouae    Kwpen    kl 
e.eryUxly    »t...uiJ    fiAiuioe   them    early 


A.  G.  POLLARD  &  CO. 

Figure  6-2.    A.  G.  Pollard  &  Company  advertisement  from  Lowell  Sunday  Arena    February  12,  1893. 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


The  tenement  residents  were  operating  under 
similar  economic  conditions  as  the 
boardinghouse  keepers.  They  had,  however, 
more  freedom  to  furnish  their  homes  as  they 
pleased  and  to  make  purchases  characteristic  of 
a  nuclear  family  arrangement  according  to  their 
personal  preferences  and  financial  means.  No 
doubt  they  patronized  local  merchants,  but 
merchants  did  not  target  them  as  a  special 
consumer  group.  Because  these  households 
were  usually  composed  of  single  families  who 
were  not  under  the  supervision  of  a  keeper,  they 
enjoyed  more  autonomy  over  their  lives  than 
single  workers  living  in  the  boardinghouse. 

The  corporate  housing  at  the  Boott  Mills 
represented  two  types  of  household  composition 
operating  under  similar  financial  constraints. 
The  ceramics  purchased  by  the  residents  are 
expected  to  reflect  the  differences  in  household 
arrangement  and  possibly  minor  socioeconomic 
levels  within  the  working  classes.  Ceramics 
purchased  by  the  boardinghouse  keepers 
should  reflect  the  service  and  consumption  of 
food  on  a  large  scale  similar  to  other 
establishments  providing  the  same  services,  e.g., 
restaurants  and  hotels.  The  presence  of 
undecorated  wares,  unmatched  vessels,  and 
fewer  specialized  tablewares,  especially  those 
associated  with  status  display,  are  expected  to 
characterize     the     boardinghouse     ceramic 


assemblage.  Tenement  vessels,  on  the  other 
hand,  should  illustrate  the  purchases  indicative 
of  a  nuclear  family  arrangement.  Their  ceramic 
assemblage  is  expected  to  place  a  greater 
emphasis  on  porcelain  wares,  matched  table 
settings,  and  status  related  wares,  such  as 
matched  tea-  and  coffeeware,  in  an  effort  to 
display  to  the  public  the  family's  upward 
mobility  and  to  distinguish  them  from  their 
neighbors  in  the  boardinghouse. 


Research  Framework 

Archeologically  excavated  materials  from 
backlots  of  Boott  Mill  units  #45  (boardinghouse) 
and  #48  (tenement)  provide  a  rare  opportunity 
to  view  19th-century  workers'  material  culture 
and  provide  a  basis  for  comparison  between  life 
in  the  boardinghouses  and  corporate  tenements. 
The  recovery  and  analyses  of  household 
materials  enables  differentiations  to  be  made 
between  the  distinctive  behaviors  that  identify 
members  of  different  classes.  The  purpose  of 
this  study  is  to  illuminate  the  general 
characteristics  of  household  material  culture — 
more  specifically,  ceramics — that  can  be  reliably 
related  to  family  organization  and 
socioeconomic  standing. 


Ceramic  Analysis    89 


Shepard's  work  on  status  variation  in 
antebellum  Alexandria,  Virginia  (1987),  has 
defined  three  variables  affecting  ceramic 
assemblage  composition  that  can  be  identified 
and  measured  in  the  archeological  record: 
quantity;  quality;  and  variety.  The  degree  of 
expression  for  these  categories  will  reflect  the 
accessibility  and  preference  of  the  item  by  the 
consumer. 

The  variable  quantity,  as  used  in  this  study, 
refers  to  the  number  of  items  making  up  a 
material  assemblage.  As  household  income  is 
the  strongest  determinant  for  the  size  of  a 
material  assemblage  (Schiffer  et  al.  1981), 
individuals  with  a  greater  income  ought  to  have 
more  household  items,  as  a  result  of  their 
purchasing  power,  than  families  in  lower  income 
brackets.  Likewise,  the  size  and  stability  of  a 
household  will  affect  the  number  of  household 
goods  acquired  by  a  family. 

Quality  is  determined  by  the  value  of  an  item 
and  is  usually  expressed  monetarily  in  terms  of 
price.  Scarcity  of  the  materials  needed  to 
manufacture  the  object,  along  with  its 
desirability,  frequently  function  as  major 
variables  in  determining  value. 

Variety  is  calculated  by  looking  at  the  number 
of  items  within  an  assemblage  that  have 
different  or  specialized  functions.  Deetz  has 
determined  that  households  with  low  incomes 
would  not  be  able  to  afford  more  expensive 
ceramic  wares  and  that  different  food  ways 
practices  between  classes  would  result  in 
discernable  differences  in  the  ranges  of  forms 
for  ceramic  vessels  used  (Deetz  1977:  51).  Thus, 
it  can  be  expected  that  families  with  limited 
financial  resources  would  purchase  basic 
ceramic  forms  needed  for  food  preparation, 
service,  and  consumption  and  fewer  luxury 
items,  while  more  affluent  families  would  have 
purchased  the  basics  in  addition  to  an  array  of 
non-necessities. 

Appearance  of  the  variables  quantity,  quality, 
and  variety  in  a  ceramic  assemblage  is  affected 
by  social  and  economic  factors.  It  has  been 
noted  that  households  with  the  same  income, 
but  from  different  social  classes,  will  display 
quite  different  spending  strategies  (Coleman 
1961:  176).  Members  of  a  social  class  are 
products  of  their  respective  socialization  process 
through  which  they  learn  what  objects  are 
desirable,  proper  and  acceptable,  and 
undesirable. 

The  ceramic  assemblages  from  the  Boott 
Mills  excavations  represent  two  forms  of 
households  with  approximately  the  same  class 
affiliation  but  occupying  different 
socioeconomic  ranks  within  the  working  class 


(e.g.,  unskilled  vs.  skilled  operatives).  A 
comparison  of  these  two  assemblages  addresses 
the  issue  of  whether  household  composition 
(corporate  boardinghouse  vs.  nuclear  family) 
and  relative  socioeconomic  level — admittedly  a 
fairly  minor  distinction  in  this  instance — within  a 
class  affects  ceramic  purchase,  use,  and  discard. 
A  set  of  expectations,  framed  as  hypotheses, 
have  been  generated  to  test  for  the  differences 
between  the  social  and  economic  behaviors  of 
the  residents  of  boardinghouse  #45  and 
tenement  #48  of  the  Boott  Mills. 


Hypothesis  Testing  for  Quantity 

1.  The  tenement  assemblage  will  have  a  greater 
number  of  vessels  per  person  as  compared  to  the 
boardinghouse  assemblage. 


Hypotheses  Testing  for  Quality 

1.  The  tenement  assemblage  will  have  a  greater 
percentage  of  porcelain  and  transfer-printed  wares 
than  the  boardinghouse  assemblage,  which  will 
show  the  opposite  pattern. 

2.  The  tenement  assemblage  will  have  a  higher 
percentage  of  matched  vessels  within  the  total 
transfer  printed  ware,  total  porcelain,  and 
undecorated  whiteware  as  compared  to  the 
boardinghouse  assemblage,  which  will  show  the 
opposite  pattern. 

3.  The  tenement  housing  assemblage  will  have  a 
higher  mean  ceramic  assemblage  value  as 
compared  to  the  boardinghouse  assemblage. 


Hypotheses  Testing  for  Variety 

1.  The  boardinghouse  assemblage  will  have  a  greater 
percentage  of  tableware,  storage  ware,  and  tea-  and 
coffeewares  as  compared  to  the  tenement 
assemblage  which  will  show  the  opposite  pattern. 

2.  The  boardinghouse  assemblage  will  have  a  greater 
percentage  of  serving  flatware  and  serving  bowls 
within  the  total  tableware  as  compared  to  the 
tenement  assemblage  which  will  show  the  opposite 
pattern. 

3.  The  tenement  assemblage  will  have  a  greater 
percentage  of  transfer-printed  flatware  and  a 
smaller  percentage  of  banded  bowls  and 
undecorated  flatware  than  the  boardinghouse 
assemblage  which  will  show  the  opposite  pattern. 

4.  The  tenement  assemblage  will  have  a  larger  ratio 
of  numbers  of  different  shapes  to  total  number  of 
vessels  within  the  total  ceramic  assemblage  as 
compared  to  the  boardinghouse  assemblage  which 
will  show  the  opposite  pattern. 


90   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Methods 
Vessel  Count 

The  identification  of  vessels  within  the 
ceramic  assemblage  forms  the  basis  of  analysis 
for  research  questions  centered  on  variety  and 
quantity.  In  addition  to  providing  the 
archeologist  with  an  indication  of  the  number  of 
vessels  used  on  a  site,  questions  regarding  food 
consumption  activities  and  the  function  of 
vessels  used  in  this  process  may  also  be 
addressed. 

Vessel  counts  were  generated  from  the  Boott 
Mills  data  by  quantifying  sherds  or  mending 
sherds  that  exhibited  a  ware,  type,  variety, 
and/or  form  that  was  different  from  other 
mended  or  single  sherds.  The  remaining 
ceramic  fragments  that  could  not  be  identified 
as  part  of  a  vessel,  either  because  they  did  not 
mend  with  other  sherds,  or  because  they  were 
likely  part  of  another  already  identified  vessel, 
were  counted  and  grouped  according  to  ware, 
type,  and  variety  and  placed  in  a  secondary 
category. 

Two  ceramic  vessel  counts  were  calculated: 
Total  Vessel  Count  (TVC)  and  Identified  Vessel 
Count  (IVC).  The  Total  Vessel  Count  was 
compiled  for  use  in  determining  the  quantity  of 
ceramic  vessels  within  the  assemblages,  as  well 
as  arriving  at  percentages  of  porcelain,  transfer 
printed  ware,  whiteware,  undecorated  ware,  and 
minimally  decorated  wares. 

Identifiable  Vessel  Counts  included  those 
vessel  forms  that  could  be  identified  according 
to  function.  The  IVC  was  used  to  obtain 
percentages  of  tableware,  storage  ware,  and 
coffee-  and  teaware,  in  addition  to  calculating 
the  percentages  of  serving  flatware,  serving 
bowls,  transfer  printed  flatware,  banded  bowls, 
and  edged  ware.  The  variety  of  vessel  forms 
within  each  assemblage  was  also  determined 
using  the  IVC,  as  well  as  the  calculation  of  mean 
ceramic  assemblage  values. 


Dating 

Dates  were  assigned  to  ceramic  vessels 
recovered  from  the  boardinghouse  and 
tenement  backlots  on  the  basis  of  decorative 
styles  and  elements  and  manufacturer's  marks. 
Because  the  methods  and  techniques  of 
decorating  earthenwares  and  porcelain  changed 
through  time,  some  more  so  than  others, 
ceramic  vessels  can  frequently  be  assigned  to 
fairly  short  time  spans.  Those  vessels  datable 
based  on  decorative  styles  and  elements,  were 
combined  with  identifiable  manufacturer's 
marks     (discussed     below)     and     used     in 


conjunction  with  dated  glass  vessels  to  arrive  at 
terminus  post  quern  dates  for  appropriate 
features. 


Results 

Archeological  excavation  of  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse  and  tenement  backlots  yielded  a 
total  of  7,183  ceramic  fragments.  The  nature  of 
the  assemblage  was  extremely  fragmentary, 
indicating  that  considerable  post-depositional 
activity  in  the  form  of  grading,  use  of  the 
backlots  for  coal  storage,  and  pavement  of  the 
area  for  a  20th-century  parking  lot  resulted  in 
considerable  damage  to  archeological  materials. 
Of  the  vessels  recovered,  only  one  was  90%  intact 
and  that  was  a  redware  flowerpot  found  in  a 
planting  hole  behind  the  tenement  (Figure  6-3). 

The  total  number  of  vessels  retrieved 
archeologically  was  305.  This  relatively  low 
number  is  unusual  for  assemblages  associated 
with  households  containing  several  individuals 
over  a  period  of  time,  such  as  the  tenement  and 
boardinghouse.  The  introduction  of  municipal 
refuse  collection  in  1871  (Bell  1987a:  60) 
undoubtedly  had  a  direct  impact  on  the  quantity 
and  quality  of  materials  that  were  deposited  in 
the  backlots.  Similarly,  the  vessel  count  may 
reflect  ceramic  assemblages  that  were  limited  in 
size  because  of  economic  constraints  on 
consumers.  At  best,  the  vessel  counts  offer  only 
a  limited  view  of  the  number  and  types  of 
ceramics  used  by  the  boardinghouse  and 
tenement  residents. 

A  total  of  86  vessels  was  recovered  from  the 
Boott  Mills  tenement  (#48).  A  breakdown  by 
ware  type,  shown  in  Table  6-1,  illustrates  that  the 
most  frequently  acquired  wares  were  whitewares, 
redwares,  and  porcelain.  The  boardinghouse 
(#45)  assemblage  consists  of  191  vessels  and 
reflects  a  similar  ware  type  preference,  with 
whiteware,  redware,  and  porcelain  being  the 
predominant  categories. 


Table  6-1.  Summary  of  ceramics  by 

ware  type. 

Tenement 

Boardinghouse 

Ware  Type 

#          % 

#                % 

Bennington 

0         0.00 

1              0.52 

Cream  ware 

1          1.16 

5              2.61 

Earthenware 

0         0.00 

1              0.52 

Pearlware 

2         2.32 

1              0.52 

Porcelain 

11       12.79 

8              4.18 

Redware 

12       13.95 

12              6.28 

Stoneware 

3         3.48 

11              5.75 

Whiteware 

56       65.11 

149           78.01 

Yellow  ware 

1          1.16 

3              1.57 

Total 

86     100.00 

191          100.00 

Ceramic  Analysis    91 


■  ■ 

*■ 

inch 

^^^^BBBHI^^HH^^B 

Figure  6-3.  Redware  flower  pot  recovered  from  tenement  backlot.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


The  tenement  assemblage  contains  over  twice 
as  many  porcelain  vessels  (12.7%)  as  the 
boardinghouse  collection  (4.1%)  suggesting  a 
preference  for  finer  manufactured  vessels, 
porcelain  being  used  predominantly  for  the 
production  of  fine  table-  and  teawares.  The 
heavy  reliance  on  whitewares  by  both  the 
tenement  (65.1%)  and  boardinghouse  (78.0%) 
indicates  that  their  purchasing  patterns  were  not 
in  line  with,  and  indeed  somewhat  lower,  than 
the  more  prosperous  classes  of  the  late  19th 
century.  By  the  last  decades  of  the  1800s,  the 
term  "Thrashers  China"  was  frequently  used  by 
members  of  the  more  affluent  industrial  middle 
class  to  refer  derogatively  to  the  inexpensive  and 
utilitarian  whitewares.  Such  wares  were  still 
commonly  used  by  the  rural  folk,  however,  long 
after  the  majority  of  Americans  had  purchased 


colored  porcelain  to  set  their  tables  (Wetherbee 
1985: 33). 

An  examination  of  the  types  of  vessel  forms 
for  the  boardinghouse  and  tenement 
assemblages  is  presented  in  Table  6-2.  The  data 
reveal  that  the  range  of  vessel  forms  for  both 
households  are  very  similar.  The  most 
discernible  differences  are  in  the  percentages  of 
tea-  and  coffeeware,  with  cups  representing 
15.1%  and  saucers  20.9%  of  the  tenement 
assemblage  and  11.5%  and  18.9%,  respectively, 
of  the  boardinghouse  vessels.  Certain 
specialized  forms  present  in  the  boardinghouses 
are  absent  from  the  tenement,  such  as  ale 
bottles,  gravy  boats,  jugs,  teapots,  and  basins. 

An  evaluation  of  the  decorative  forms  is 
illustrated  in  Table  6-3.  Immediately  evident  is 
the  similarity  of  the  two  assemblages.  For  both 
the  tenement   and   boardinghouse,  the   most 


92    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


prominent  forms  of  vessel  decoration  were  plain 
or  undecorated,  transfer  printed,  and  molded. 


Table  6-2.  Summary  of 

ceramics  by 

vessel  type. 

Tenement 

Boardir 

ighouse 

Vessel  Form 

# 

% 

# 

% 

Ale  bottle 

1 

0.52 

0 

0.00 

Bowl 

18 

20.93 

50 

26.17 

Chamber  pot 

1 

1.16 

0 

0.00 

Gock 

1 

1.16 

2 

1.04 

Cup 

13 

15.11 

22 

11.51 

Flower  pot 

3 

3.48 

5 

2.61 

Gravy  boat 

0 

0.00 

1 

0.52 

Jar 

4 

4.65 

4 

2.09 

H 

0 

0.00 

1 

0.52 

Plate 

10 

11.62 

30 

15.70 

Platter 

3 

3.48 

10 

5.23 

Pot 

4 

4.65 

1 

0.52 

Saucer 

18 

20.93 

36 

18.84 

Tea  pot 

0 

0.00 

1 

0.52 

Wash  basin 

0 

0.00 

1 

0.52 

Unidentified 

11 

1279 

26 

13.61 

Total 

86 

100.00 

191 

100.00 

Table  6-3.  Summary  of 

ceramics  by 

decoration. 

Tenement 

Boardir 

ighouse 

Decoration 

# 

% 

# 

% 

Decal 

1 

1.16 

4 

2.09 

Dipped 

0 

0.00 

3 

1.57 

Edged 

6 

6.97 

11 

5.75 

Gilded 

9 

10.46 

8 

4.18 

Handpainted 

9 

10.46 

8 

4.18 

Lead  glazed 

6 

6.97 

10 

5.23 

Molded 

9 

10.46 

29 

15.18 

Overglazed 

1 

1.16 

0 

0.00 

Salt  glazed 

1 

1.16 

5 

2.61 

Sponge 

3 

3.48 

6 

3.14 

Transfer  print 

12 

13.95 

32 

16.75 

Undecorated 

28 

32.55 

74 

38.74 

Wash 

1 

1.16 

1 

0.52 

Total 

86 

100.00 

191 

100.00 

Blue-edged  ware  comprised  40.0%  of  the 
identifiable  plates  recovered  from  the  tenement 
and  36.6%  of  the  boardinghouse  plate 
assemblage.  A  detailed  study  of  the  impressed 
rim  patterns  demonstrates  that  none  of  the 
molded  patterns  matched,  indicating  that  the 
plates  must  have  been  purchased  one  or  two  at  a 
time  rather  than  in  sets  (Figure  6-4).  England 
produced  green-  and  blue-edged  plates  from 
the  late  18th  century  into  the  19th  century,  with 
the  blue-edged  plates  being  marketed  well  into 
the  1850s  and  perhaps  even  later  (Miller  1974: 
204).  Merchants  frequently  purchased  ceramics 
from  wholesalers  and  bought  whatever  green  or 
blue-edged  plates  were  available.  As  a  result, 
seldom  did  the  edgeware  of  one  season  match 


that  of  the  next  (Miller  1974:  204).  Therefore, 
anyone  who  purchased  their  ceramics  by  the 
piece  rather  than  by  the  set  could  only  hope  to 
match  the  plates  on  the  basis  of  color  and  basic 
design  elements. 

Transfer  printed  plates  were  the  largest 
category  of  decorative  flatware  for  the  tenement 
(30.0%)  while  only  10.0%  of  the  boardinghouse 
plates  were  printed  (Figure  6-5).  The  tenement 
assemblage  contains  one  fragment  of  a  blue 
willow  pattern  plate  in  addition  to  one  brown 
floral  and  one  green  geometric  pattern  printed 
plate.  The  boardinghouse  printed  plates,  on  the 
other  hand,  display  two  brown  floral  patterns  and 
one  green  floral  print. 

Unlike  the  edgeware,  there  appears  to  be  no 
attempt  made  by  the  tenement  or 
boardinghouse  residents  to  obtain  matching 
patterns  of  printed  ware.  No  two  plates  appear 
similar  in  any  manner  other  than  color.  Because 
of  the  speed  with  which  transfer  printed  patterns 
rose  and  fell  in  popularity,  it  was  probably  quite 
difficult  to  obtain  similar  patterns  for  breakage 
replacement.  It  appears  that  the  occupants  of 
both  the  boardinghouse  and  tenement  were 
purchasing  transfer  printed  plates,  not  as  a 
substitute  for  broken  plates  within  a  set,  but  as 
supplements  to  an  already  existing  collection  of 
tableware. 

Undecorated  plates  represent  the  second 
largest  category  of  flatware,  next  to  edgeware,  for 
the  boardinghouse  (36.6%)  and  the  third  most 
popular  group,  10.0%,  for  the  tenement.  Three 
times  the  number  of  plates  for  the 
boardinghouse  were  undecorated  as  compared 
to  the  tenement  assemblage  suggesting  that 
there  was  indeed  a  possible  concern  for 
similarity  among  dinnerware  patterns.  The  plain 
whiteware  would  have  been  easier  to  acquire, 
thus  making  replacement  with  like  wares  more 
feasible  (Figure  6-6).  Mrs.  Blanche  Graham,  a 
resident  of  a  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse  as  a 
child,  remembers  that  the  china  she  helped 
carry  to  the  table  was  undecorated  whiteware, 
"solid  stuff"  (Bond  1987:  42).  Likewise,  a 
photograph  of  a  boardinghouse  dining  room,  ca. 
1908,  displays  place  settings  that  appear  to  be 
undecorated  whitewares,  as  no  printed  vessels 
are  evident  (Figure  6-7). 

Tea-  and  coffeeware  (cups  and  saucers) 
reinforce  many  of  the  conclusions  drawn  from 
the  plate  sample.  Comprising  32.5%  of  the 
tenement  total  ceramic  assemblage  and  29.3%  of 
the  boardinghouse  vessels,  the  large 
percentages  of  tea-  and  coffeeware  illustrates 
the  importance  of  coffee  and  tea  consumption  in 
the  tenement  and  boardinghouse. 


Ceramic  Analysis    93 


Figure  6-4.   Impressed  blue  shell  edged  pates  from  the  boardinghouse  and  tenement  backlots 
(1830-1850).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  6-5.    Brown  floral  transfer  printed  plates  from  the  boardinghouse  and  tenement  backlots  (1880- 
1910).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


94   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  6-6.     Undecorated  whiteware  plate  (left)  from  the  tenement  and  platter  (right)  from  the 
boardinghouse.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Ceramic  Analysis    95 


X 

15 

c 
.9 

o 


O 

U 


o 

i— i 
as 


6 
o 
o 

Ih 

M) 

C 

c 

3 

o 

X 

bo 

c 


o 

V4-. 

o 

<u 

H 

o 
o 


ix,  c 


96   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  6-8.    Undecorated  whiteware  tea/coffee  cups  from  the  boardinghouse  and  tenement  backlots. 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


A  brief  survey  of  an  extant  boardinghouse 
menu  reveals  that  coffee  or  tea  was  served  at  all 
three  meals  (Hareven  1982:  24),  indicating  that 
these  were  the  beverages  of  choice.  A  standard 
tea  set  frequently  included  a  teapot,  sugar  and 
creamer,  waste  bowl,  six  cups  with  saucers,  and 
dessert  plates  (Wetherbee  1985:  29).  Evidence 
for  the  presence  of  specialized  teawares  in  the 
two  assemblages  is  very  limited.  In  fact,  the  only 
specialized  tea-  or  coffeeware  vessel  present  was 
a  Bennington  ware  tea  pot.  It  seems  that  tea-  or 
coffeewares  at  the  tenement  and  boardinghouse 
served  more  in  a  functional  capacity  than  as 
status  display  items. 

Half  (50.0%)  of  the  tea  or  coffee  cups  in  the 
boardinghouse  assemblage  were  undecorated. 
Similarly,  undecorated  cups,  30.7%,  formed  the 


largest  group  for  the  tenement  ceramics  (Figure 
6-8).  Transfer  printed  cups  for  the  two 
assemblages  are  all  unique,  no  two  patterns 
being  alike.  The  tenement  has  slightly  more 
printed  cups,  15.3%,  as  compared  to  the 
boardinghouse  with  9.0%.  Romantic  prints  in 
brown  and  an  oriental  print  in  blue  dominate  the 
color  and  theme  elements. 

Of  the  saucers  represented  from  the  two 
assemblages,  no  two  vessels  appear  similar  in 
pattern  except  for  the  undecorated  wares,  which 
account  for  28.5%  of  the  boardinghouse  saucers. 
Printed  saucers  equal  undecorated  saucers  for 
the  boardinghouse  ceramics.  Blue,  brown,  red, 
and  green  printed  patterns  dominate,  with  the 
common  designs  being  floral  and  geometric. 
None  of  the  patterns  match,  but  of  the  10 


Ceramic  Analysis    97 


Figure  6-9.  Handpainted  saucers  from  corporate  housing  backlots  (1840-1860).  (Photograph  by  Richard 
S.  Kanaski.) 


printed  saucers,  nine  exhibit  floral  patterns, 
indicating  that  perhaps  some  attempt  was  made, 
if  not  to  obtain  the  exact  pattern  and  color,  to  at 
least  stay  within  the  same  design  elements. 

On  the  other  hand,  only  11.1%  of  the 
identifiable  saucers  recovered  from  the 
tenement  backlot  displayed  transfer  print 
patterns.  The  prints  were  blue  floral  patterns 
that  are  unrelated. 

A  rather  large  percentage  of  saucers  from  the 
tenement,  22.2%,  was  handpainted  (Figure  6-9). 
The  dominant  decorative  elements  were  floral 
motifs  painted  in  the  sprig  style.  This  design, 
consisting  of  small  floral  elements  scattered  over 
a  plain  background,  was  popular  from  the  1840s 
until  the  1860s  (Majewski  and  O'Brien  1987: 157). 
The  typical  motif  included  a  thin  hairline  black 
stem  with  small  green  leaves  and  stylized  red 
and  blue  flowers  with  berries  (Lofstrom  et  al. 
1982: 9). 


Although  none  of  the  sprig  decorated  saucers 
match  in  style  or  color,  it  appears  that  efforts 
were  made  by  tenement  residents  to  acquire 
tea-  or  coffeeware  in  a  similar  pattern.  Because 
of  the  nature  of  sprig  painted  designs — large 
portions  of  the  vessel  being  left  undecorated — it 
is  quite  possible  that  some  of  the  undecorated 
cups  from  the  tenement  assemblage  are 
represented  only  by  unpainted  portions  of  the 
vessel.  It  is  likely  that  there  was  some  evidence 
of  matched  sets,  but  unfortunately  this 
information  has  not  been  recovered. 

Of  the  bowls  recovered,  20.9%  were  from  the 
tenement  backlot  and  26.1%  from  the 
boardinghouse  backlot.  The  most  numerous 
decorative  styles  were  transfer  printed  and 
undecorated  wares.  In  fact,  bowls  used  as 
tableware  in  the  tenement  assemblage  were 
either  printed  or  undecorated.  The  printed 
patterns  were  similar  only  in  exhibiting  floral 


98   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


motifs,  but,  once  again,  none  of  the  patterns 
matched,  further  indicating  a  replacement 
purchase  pattern.  The  majority  of  bowls  from 
the  boardinghouse  collection  tended  to  be  either 
undecorated  (38.0%),  printed  (20.0%),  or  molded 
(20.0%).  As  with  the  tenement  vessels,  a  floral 
theme  is  common  in  all  of  the  printed  patterns 
with  colors  ranging  from  blue  and  brown  to 
green.  However,  no  two  bowls  match.  Likewise, 
the  molded  patterns  all  represent  individual 
design  elements  with  floral,  dotted,  and  ribbed 
motifs  dominating.  As  with  the  tenement 
assemblage,  the  boardinghouse  bowl  data 
supports  a  practice  of  purchasing  bowls  as 
replacements  rather  than  in  complete  sets. 

Service-related  vessels,  such  as  large  bowls 
and  platters,  accounted  for  26.7%  of  the 
tenement's  total  vessels  and  29.3%  of  the 
boardinghouse     total     ceramics.  Both 

assemblages  showed  a  preponderance  of 
undecorated  service  bowls  (Figure  6-10).  Only 
one  attempt  at  matching  service  bowls  was 
identified,  and  this  was  with  two  sponge 
decorated  vessels  from  the  tenement 
assemblage.  Even  though  the  vessels  were 
clearly  not  from  the  same  set,  they  both 
displayed  a  similar  blue  sponge  design  that 
covers  practically  the  entire  vessel  and  appears 
somewhat  smudged  (Figure  6-11).  This  type  of 
decoration  was  found  on  a  variety  of  tableware 
forms  in  addition  to  mixing  bowls,  heavy  pots, 
and  other  kitchenware.  It  was  frequently  found 
on  stonewares  and  nonvitreous  to  semivitreous 
wares  produced  by  English  and  American 
potteries,  particularly  those  operating  in  New 
Jersey  and  Ohio  from  1860  to  1935  (Ketchum 
1983:178,228-229). 

All  serving  platters  from  the  boardinghouse 
assemblage  were  undecorated.  The  tenement 
serving  platters  displayed  molded,  undecorated, 
and  transfer  printed  designs  with  no  two  vessels 
being  alike. 

It  appears  that  the  tenement  residents  placed 
more  emphasis  on  decorated  service  vessels 
while  the  boardinghouse  occupants  tended  to 
rely  mainly  on  undecorated  whitewares.  This 
suggests  that  perhaps  meal  time  in  the 
tenements  was  characterized  by  more  serving 
vessels  being  taken  directly  from  the  kitchen  to 
the  table,  while  the  boardinghouse  relied  on 
fewer  serving  vessels,  thereby  reducing  the 
number  of  vessles  carried  to  and  from  the 
kitchen.  This  would  have  cut  down  on  washing- 
up  and  meant  boardinghouse  keepers  did  not 
have  to  buy  lots  of  extra  china  that  would 
inevitably  just  get  broken.  In  fact,  country  hotel 
keepers  were  discouraged  from  serving  "a 
spoonful  or  two  of  everything  in  little  individual 


dishes  sprinkled  all  around  a  guests  plate"  (Lane 
1901: 17).  Indeed,  the  were  urged  to  abandon  the 
practice,  as  "it  is  almost  impossible  to 
economically  set  a  good  table  when  this  method 
is  employed"  (Lane  1901:  17). 


Mean   Ceramic  Assemblage  Values 

In  recent  years,  several  studies  have  used 
Miller's  (1980)  ceramic  indices  as  occupational 
or  status  indicators  (Spencer-Wood  1987; 
LeeDecker  et  al.  1987).  The  underlying 
assumption  behind  these  studies  is  that 
variations  in  the  mean  value  of  ceramic 
assemblages  can  be  related  to  changes  in  status, 
and  furthermore,  to  occupation. 

Miller's  (1980)  indices  were  calculated  by 
using  prices  for  decorative  types  of  whiteware 
cups  and  saucers,  plates,  and  bowls  for  their  year 
of  manufacture  and  primary  sale.  Price  lists 
from  British  potters  and  American  distributors 
were  used  to  arrive  at  ratios  reflecting  the  cost  of 
decorated  whitewares  in  relation  to  cream 
colored  ware  which  was  the  least  expensive. 
Separate  price  indices  were  constructed  for 
cups,  saucers,  plates,  and  bowls  using  price  lists 
for  years  representing  almost  every  decade: 
from  1770  to  1880  for  cups  and  saucers;  from  1787 
to  1874  for  plates;  and  from  1802  to  1858  for 
bowls.  Mean  ceramic  assemblage  values  are 
calculated  by  selecting  an  index  year  and 
multiplying  the  ratios  of  whiteware  prices  by  the 
quantity  of  each  decorative  type  in  a  given 
assemblage.  The  sum  of  the  these  products  is 
then  divided  by  the  total  number  of  vessels, 
which  provides  the  weighted  mean  cost  ratio  of 
the  archeological  sample. 

Most  studies  involving  the  use  of  Miller's 
(1980)  ceramic  indices  concentrate  on  ceramics 
recovered  from  clearly  defined  deposits  such  as 
refuse  dumps,  wells,  and  privies  (Shepard  1987; 
DeCunzo  1987).  Because  of  the  limited  number 
of  vessels  identified  for  both  the  tenement  and 
boardinghouse  assemblages,  analysis  was  not 
restricted  to  vessels  recovered  from  the  richest 
deposits  but  was  broadened  in  scope  to 
encompass  all  vessels  recovered  from  the 
respective  backlots.  Even  though  this  method 
introduces  some  problems  in  arriving  at  reliable 
mean  ceramic  dates,  it  does  provide  a  larger, 
more  representative  sample  of  the  types  and 
variety  of  ceramics  used  by  the  household 
residents. 

Both  the  tenement  and  boardinghouse  were 
within  the  same  temporal  range  of  1835  to  1918. 
Mill  records  indicate  that  the  boardinghouse 
was  designated  as  a  storage  structure  by  1917 
and  the  tenement  likewise  by  1918  (Bond  1987: 


Ceramic  Analysis    99 


Figure  6-10.    Large  undecorated  yellow  ware  bowl  from  the  boardinghouse  backlot.    (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  6-11.  Sponge  decorated  stoneware  bowls  from  the  backlot  excavations  (1860-1935).  (Photograph 
by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


200    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Appendix  B).  It  can  therefore  be  reasonably 
assumed  that  no  ceramic  materials  were 
deposited  in  the  backlots  as  a  result  of  the 
occupants'  activities  post-1917  for  the 
boardinghouse  and  post-1918  for  the  tenement. 

The  ceramics  were  analyzed  using  Miller's 
(1989)  latest  index  values  for  cups  and  saucers 
(1881),  plates  (1874),  and  bowls  (1858).  These 
values  were  chosen  because  they  best 
represented  the  mean  date  ranges  for  the 
tenement  and  boardinghouse  sites.  The  latest 
index  value  for  each  type  was  used,  and,  in  cases 
where  there  was  a  missing  value,  the  closest 
available  value  was  substituted. 

Small  differences  in  price  are  recorded  by 
Miller  in  some  years  for  various  plate  sizes  and 
for  handled  versus  unhandled  cups,  as  well  as 
for  unspecified  cups  and  saucers.  It  was  difficult 
to  identify  different  types  of  cups  and  sizes  of 
plates  because  the  majority  of  sherds  were  quite 
tiny,  so  index  values  were  averaged  for  all  plate 
sizes  in  each  type  and  as  well  as  for  all  forms  of 
cups  in  an  effort  to  obtain  a  single  value  of  each 
type  for  each  year.  As  the  prices  between  vessel 
sizes  appeared  relatively  small,  it  was  deemed 
best  to  average  these  values  in  an  attempt  to 
arrive  at  a  more  representative  price  as  opposed 
to  randomly  selecting  values  for  one  plate  size  or 
a  particular  type  of  cup. 

The  results  of  calculating  the  Miller  indices  for 
the  total  ceramic  assemblages  from  the 
tenement  and  boardinghouse  are  presented  in 
Table  6-4.  In  order  to  evaluate  the  Miller 
Ceramic  Price  Index  results,  it  is  necessary  to 
determine  what  can  be  viewed  as  a  significant 
difference  between  the  two  average  index 
values.  This  was  accomplished  by  taking  the 
total  combined  range  of  index  values  for  the 
years  used  in  the  analysis  (i.e.,  1855,  1858,  1862, 
1874,  1875,  and  1881).  The  calculated  range  was 
1.00-6.00.  Therefore,  using  a  level  of  significance 
of  5  percent,  any  value  equal  to  or  less  than  .30 
was  not  considered  significantly  different. 


Table  6-4. 

Summary  of  Miller  index  values. 

Tenement 

Boardinghouse 

Index  Val 

ue 

Bowls 

1.40 

1.49 

Cups 

3.5 

2.44 

Plates 

1.31 

1.23 

Average 

2.07 

1.72 

There  is  a  difference  of  .35  between  the 
average  index  values  for  the  tenement  and 
boardinghouse.  The  index  values  for  cups  and 
saucers  and   plates  is  slightly  higher  for  the 


tenement  assemblage,  with  the  greatest 
difference  being  between  the  values  for  cups 
and  saucers.  For  both  the  tenement  and 
boardinghouse  the  highest  index  values  were  for 
cups  and  saucers  followed  by  bowls  and  then 
plates.  Only  for  the  cup  and  saucer  category  do 
the  calculated  indices  differ  significantly  (1.06). 
This  possibly  reflects  an  increased  emphasis  by 
the  tenement  residents  on  the  status  value  of 
ceramics  used  in  tea  or  coffee  drinking.  By  the 
last  half  of  the  19th  century,  a  wide  selection  of 
dinner  and  flatware  services  was  accessible  to  all 
socioeconomic  levels.  The  indices  for  both  the 
tenement  and  the  boardinghouse  reflect  the 
impact  of  the  availability  of  mass-produced 
ceramic  wares  for  household  use. 


Hypothesis  Testing 

The  results  of  the  hypothesis  testing  indicate 
that  for  the  variables  quantity,  quality,  and 
variety  there  was  little  variation  between  the 
tenement  and  boardinghouse  assemblages.  The 
similarity  of  the  assemblages  suggests  that  even 
though  tenement  residents  represented 
predominantly  nuclear  households  and  were 
afforded  greater  freedom  in  the  purchase  of 
ceramics  than  the  boardinghouse,  the  economic 
restrictions  placed  upon  them  by  mill  life  and 
low  wages  acted  as  a  stronger  determinant  in 
household  purchases  than  differences  in 
socioeconomic  rank  within  the  working  class  or 
in  family  composition.  The  following  data  are 
presented  in  support  of  this  conclusion. 


Hypothesis  Testing  for  Quantity 

The  variable  quantity  was  measured  by  the 
total  number  of  vessels  per  individual  for  both 
the  tenement  and  boardinghouse.  Because  the 
assemblages  reflect  the  ceramics  used  by 
different  households  with  a  number  of 
associated  users,  an  evaluative  technique  was 
devised  for  making  a  more  accurate  comparison 
between  the  two  values.  The  number  of 
residents  in  10-year  increments  from  1850  to 
1910  were  averaged  for  the  boardinghouse  and 
tenement.  The  total  number  of  ceramic  vessels 
was  then  divided  by  this  figure,  giving  the 
number  of  vessels  per  person. 

Table  6-5  presents  the  results  for  the  number 
of  vessels  per  person.  These  numbers  are 
somewhat  high,  but,  as  expected,  there  are 
slightly  more  vessels  per  person  for  the 
tenement  than  the  boardinghouse.  This 
suggests  that  a  table  setting  for  the  tenement 
would  have  included  more  vessels  per  person, 
reflecting  a  more  specialized  means  of  food 


Ceramic  Analysis    101 


service  and  consumption.  Foods  such  as 
vegetables  and  other  side  dishes  were  likely 
served  separately  as  opposed  to  having  all  of  the 
food  served  on  one  plate  and  brought  to  the 
table  (or,  concomitantly,  brought  to  table  on 
platters  or  in  large  bowls  and  served  onto  only 
one  plate  per  person). 


Table  6-5.  Comparison  < 

af  number  of 

ceramic  vessels  per 

person. 

Tenement 

Boardinghouse 

Average  no.  persons 
Total  refined  vessels 

5.0 
71.0 

17.5 
168.0 

Refined  vessels/person 
Total  vessels 

14.2 
86.0 

9.6 
191.0 

Vessels  per  person 

17.2 

10.9 

Hypotheses  Testing  for  Quality 

The  quality  of  the  vessels  was  determined  by 
measuring  three  criteria  within  the  ceramic  data. 
The  first  test  involved  the  percentage  of 
porcelain,  transfer  printed  ware,  whiteware, 
undecorated  ware,  and  minimally  decorated 
ware  within  the  totals  of  the  boardinghouse  and 
tenement  ceramics.  The  tenement  assemblage 
was  expected  to  have  a  higher  percentage  of 
porcelain  and  transfer  printed  wares  reflecting 
an  increased  awareness  for  status  display  in 
tableware.  As  Table  6-6  illustrates,  however,  the 
results  are  strikingly  similar.  The  percentages 
indicate  that  both  assemblages  displayed  no 
significant  differences  in  all  categories  except 
porcelain.  The  tenement  assemblage  contains 
over  three  times  the  number  of  porcelain  vessels 
than  the  boardinghouse.  This  is  primarily  a 
result  of  the  large  number  of  porcelain  tea-  and 
coffeewares  in  the  tenement,  reflecting  an 
increased  awareness  in  the  status  value  of  tea- 
and  coffeeware  in  addition  to  the  opportunity  of 
tenement  families  to  use  tea  and  coffee  in  status 
display  activities  such  as  serving  tea,  etc.,  to 
guests — an  activity  not  afforded  boardinghouse 
residents. 


Table  6-6.    Counts  and  percentages 

of  ceramic  types 

within  total  vessel  counts. 

Tenement 

Boardinghouse 

Ceramic  Type 

# 

% 

# 

% 

Porcelain 

11 

8.80 

8 

2.56 

Transfer  print 

12 

9.60 

32 

10.25 

Whiteware 

56 

44.80 

149 

47.75 

Undecorated 

28 

22.40 

74 

23.71 

Minimal  dec. 

9 

7.20 

20 

6.41 

Molded 

9 

7.20 

29 

9.29 

The  second  test  used  in  determining  the 
quality  of  the  ceramic  vessels  was  a  comparison 
of  the  number  of  matched  sets  for  each  ceramic 
type  within  the  tenement  and  boardinghouse 
assemblages.  Vessels  were  identified  as 
matching  if  they  displayed  the  same  decorative 
design.  From  both  assemblages,  the  only 
evidence  indicating  that  a  near-successful 
attempt  was  made  at  matching  vessels  was 
found  in  the  appearance  of  a  blue  sponge 
decorated  bowl  and  cup  from  the  tenement.  No 
matching  vessels  were  identified  from  the 
boardinghouse  assemblage.  The  large  number 
of  floral  transfer  printed  tea-  and  coffeewares, 
even  though  in  different  colors,  possibly  reflects 
efforts  in  providing  wares — particularly  tea  and 
coffee  forms— that  were  similar  in  design  motif  if 
not  in  the  exact  pattern  or  color  for  the 
boardinghouse  residents.  The  presence  of 
several  different  molded  patterns  of  edged  ware 
in  both  assemblages  indicates  that  the  residents 
were  replacing  broken  items  of  certain  wares  but 
on  the  whole  were  not  buying  their  ceramics  in 
bulk. 

The  third  criterion  for  determining  the  quality 
of  the  ceramics  in  the  two  assemblages  is  a 
comparison  of  the  Miller  index  values.  As  shown 
earlier  in  Table  6-4,  the  average  index  values  for 
the  two  assemblages  differ  by  .35,  which  was 
calculated  as  significant.  The  highest  index 
values  for  both  the  boardinghouse  and 
tenement  were  for  cups  and  saucers,  followed  by 
bowls  and  plates.  This  suggests  that  tea-  and 
coffeeware  occupied  a  central  role  in  the 
purchase  of  ceramic  vessels.  Bowls  in  both 
assemblages  have  the  second  highest  index 
value.  This  perhaps  reflects  the  importance  of 
bowls  in  the  preparation  and  service  of  meals  in 
both  the  tenement  and  boardinghouse. 


Hypothesis  Testing  for  Variety 

The  percentages  of  various  ceramic  groupings 
were  evaluated  to  determine  the  degree  of 
variety  of  within  boardinghouse  and  tenement 
assemblages.  The  first  comparison  was  among 
the  categories  tableware,  storage  ware,  and  tea- 
and  coffeeware  within  the  total  ceramic 
assemblage.  The  results,  presented  in  Table  6-7, 
illustrate  that  tableware  and  tea-  and  coffeeware 
were  the  dominant  ceramic  groups  in  both 
assemblages.  The  presence  of  15%  more 
tableware  within  the  boardinghouse  assemblage 
is  the  largest  discernable  difference  among  the 
ceramic  groupings.  Both  assemblages  have 
relatively  similar  percentages  in  the  tea-  and 
coffeeware,  serving  flatware,  and  serving  bowl 
categories. 


102    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


The  comparison  between  serving  flatware  and 
serving  bowls  is  interesting  in  that  the 
percentages  for  serving  flatware  are  consistently 
higher  than  serving  bowls  for  both  assemblages. 


Table  6-7.     Table,  storage,  serving,   and   tea-  and 
coffeewares. 


Table  6-8.    Transfer  printed  flatware,  edged  flatware, 
and  banded  bowls. 


Tenement         Boardinghouse 


Functional  Type 
Tableware 
Storage  ware 
Tea-  arid  coffeeware 
Serving  flatware 
Serving  bowls 


# 
19 
9 
28 
13 
10 


% 

24.05 
11.39 
35.44 
16.45 
12.65 


# 

71 

11 

56 

40 

16 


% 
36.59 

5.67 
28.86 
20.61 

8.24 


The  most  notable  difference  is  with  the 
boardinghouse  data.  Serving  flatware 
represents  12.5%  more  of  the  total  vessels  than 
do  the  serving  bowls.  The  tenement  flatware,  on 
the  other  hand,  is  more  equally  represented, 
there  being  a  difference  of  only  3.49%.  Landon's 
(1987a  and  this  volume)  analysis  of  the  faunal 
material  recovered  from  the  Boott  Mills 
excavations  helps  shed  some  light  on  the  food 
purchasing  patterns  of  the  boardinghouse 
keepers  and  thus  the  types  of  food  prepared.  An 
examination  of  extant  Lowell  boardinghouse 
dietaries  reveals  that  beef  was  by  far  the  most 
frequently  purchased  meat  followed  by  pork, 
fish,  veal,  and  lamb  (Landon  1987a:  123-128). 
Breaking  these  categories  down  further 
illustrates  that  roast  and  corned  beef  were  the 
most  common  forms  of  beef  served  in  addition 
to  smaller  quantities  of  stew  beef,  tongue,  and 
tripe,  while  ham  was  the  most  frequent  type  of 
pork  (Landon  1987a:  128).  As  shown,  the  major 
types  of  meat  purchased  for  consumption  at  the 
boardinghouses  were  all  cuts  that  would  have 
been  most  effectively  served  on  large  platters. 
Thus,  the  large  percentage  of  serving  flatware  to 
serving  bowls  is  consistent  with  dietary  and 
faunal  data. 

The  results  of  comparisons  made  among 
transfer  printed  flatware,  edged  flatware,  and 
banded  bowls  for  the  tenement  and 
boardinghouse  vessels  are  presented  in  Table  6- 
8.  The  tenement  assemblage  had  a  slightly 
higher  percentage  of  transfer  printed  flatware 
(difference  of  3.08%)  than  the  boardinghouse 
assemblage.  The  percentages  of  edged  ware 
were  relatively  the  same  with  the  only  noticeable 
difference  being  the  absence  of  banded  bowls  in 
the  tenement.  In  both  cases  the  percentage  of 
edged  ware  was  equal  to  or  higher  than  transfer 
printed  flatware,  suggesting  a  preference  for  less 
expensive  decorated  flatware. 


Tenement 


Ceramic  Group 
Transfer  Print 
Banded  Bowls 
Edged  Flatware 


Boardinghouse 


%  TVC* 
4.65 
0.00 
4.65 


# 

3 

3 

11 


%  TVC 
1.57 
1.57 
5.75 


*TVC  =  total  vessel  count 


The  types  of  vessel  forms  represented  in  each 
assemblage  were  calculated  using  the 
Identifiable  Vessel  Count.  Because  of  the  large 
number  of  small  vessel  fragments,  no 
distinctions  were  made  among  the  different 
sizes  of  vessels  or  between  handled  and 
unhandled  cups.  In  an  effort  to  provide  a 
meaningful  comparison  between  vessel  forms, 
the  total  identifiable  vessel  count  was  divided  by 
the  total  number  of  forms  from  each 
assemblage.  The  closer  the  results  of  this 
calculation  are  to  1.00,  the  greater  proportion  of 
vessels  to  forms.  Likewise,  the  higher  the 
number,  the  smaller  the  proportion  of  vessels  to 
forms.  The  number  of  vessel  forms  represented 
in  the  boardinghouse  is  slightly  higher  than  the 
tenement  with  the  exceptions  being  the  absence 
of  certain  specialized  forms  such  as  basins,  tea 
pots,  gravy  boats,  ale  bottles,  and  jugs.  Table  6-9 
illustrates  that  the  tenement  had  a  slightly  lower 
value  for  the  number  of  vessels  per  form 
indicating  a  greater  proportion  of  vessels  per 
form  for  the  tenement.  The  differences  between 
the  two  assemblages,  however,  is  partly  a  result 
of  a  higher  vessel  count  for  the  boardinghouse 
and  may  also  be  affected  by  different  patterns  of 
refuse  deposition  in  the  backlots. 


Table  6-9.  Summary  of  vessels  per  form. 


IVC* 

Total  vessel  forms 

Vessels  per  form 


Tenement       Boardinghouse 


75 
10 
7.5 


168 
14 
11.7 


*IVC  =  Identified  vessel  count. 


Summary  of  Hypothesis  Testing 

Because  of  the  small  number  of  vessels 
recovered  from  the  tenement  and 
boardinghouse  backlots,  use  of  the  chi-square 
test  for  significance  was  not  a  valid  evaluative 
technique,  as  vessel  totals  for  many  categories 
fell  below  five.  It  was,  therefore,  deemed  best  to 
evaluate  the  results  of  the  hypotheses  testing 


Ceramic  Analysis    103 


based  on  the  relative  differences  between  the 
percentages  of  the  ceramic  groups  compared. 

Hypothesis  Testing  for  Quantity 

Data  testing  the  quantity  of  artifacts  between 
the  two  assemblages  clearly  supports  the 
hypothesis  that  the  tenement  will  have  a  greater 
number  of  vessels  per  person  than  the 
boardinghouse.  As  shown,  there  are  more 
vessels  per  individual  for  the  tenement  than  the 
boardinghouse.  Therefore,  class  affiliation  and 
family  structure  appear  to  affect  the  quantity  of 
vessels  purchased  by  a  household's  residents 
with  an  increase  in  class  status  resulting  in  a 
greater  number  of  vessels  per  person. 

Hypotheses  Testing  for  Quality 

Results  of  tests  evaluating  the  quality  of  the 
boardinghouse  and  tenement  ceramic 
assemblages  were  as  predicted  except  in  one 
case.  The  percentage  of  transfer  printed  wares 
for  the  boardinghouse  was  slightly  higher  than 
the  tenement  (2.8%),  but,  as  shown,  this 
difference  is  far  from  significant.  The  number  of 
matched  vessels  per  assemblage  is  quite  small. 
The  appearance  of  a  blue  sponge  cup  and  bowl 
represent  the  only  visible  attempts  at  providing 
matched  sets,  and,  as  sponge  decorated  ware 
was  quite  popular  and  inexpensive  during  the 
19th  century,  the  two  vessels  may  or  may  not  be 
from  a  complete  set.  The  lack  of  other  sponge 
decorated  vessel  forms  in  the  tenement 
assemblage  indicates  that  it  was  highly  unlikely 
that  a  complete  set  of  this  ware  was  purchased. 

Calculated  mean  ceramic  values  for  the  two 
assemblages,  using  the  Miller  Price  Index, 
yielded  the  expected  results.  The  tenement 
assemblage  average  value  was  significantly 
higher  (.35)  than  the  boardinghouse  assemblage 
value.  This  difference  is  partially  a  result  of  the 
large  number  of  porcelain  tea-  and  coffeewares 
recovered  from  the  tenement  backlot.  These 
wares  could  have  been  heirlooms  or  curated 
pieces  in  addition  to  signalling  a  purchasing 
preference  for  porcelain  tea-  and  coffeewares. 
Based  on  the  data  analyzed,  the  variable  quality 
does  not  appear  to  significantly  reflect  the 
ceramic  purchasing  patterns  of  different  social 
classes  within  the  mill  labor  force. 


Hypotheses  Testing  for  Variety 

Test  implications  for  the  variable  variety 
yielded  mixed  results.  There  is  no  significant 
difference  for  the  categories  tableware,  storage 


ware,  tea-  and  coffeeware,  serving  flatware,  and 
serving  bowls  between  the  tenement  and 
boardinghouse  assemblages.  There  does, 
however,  appear  to  be  an  interesting  comparison 
of  serving  flatware  to  serving  bowls  within  the 
boardinghouse  ceramics.  The  larger  percentage 
of  serving  flatware  reflects  the  dietary  habits  of 
the  residents  as  demonstrated  in  the  faunal  data 
(Landon,  Chapter  9,  this  volume). 

The  percentage  of  printed  flatware  from  the 
tenement  was  slightly  higher  than  the 
boardinghouse  value  but  the  difference  was  not 
enough  to  be  considered  significant.  As 
expected,  there  were  fewer  banded  bowls  in  the 
tenement  ceramics,  in  fact  none,  as  compared  to 
the  boardinghouse,  with  the  percentages  of 
edged  flatware  being  relatively  equal. 

The  number  of  vessels  per  form  supports  the 
test  implication  for  variety.  Data  from  the 
tenement  illustrate  that  there  was  more 
variation  in  the  forms  of  vessels  used  than  for 
the  boardinghouse.  Values  for  both 
assemblages  on  the  whole  reflect  little  variation 
among  the  ceramic  vessel  forms.  This  can  be 
partially  attributed  to  the  fact  that  no 
distinctions  were  made  between  different  sized 
plates,  bowls,  and  cups,  because  of  the 
fragmentary  nature  of  the  assemblages. 

The  results  of  the  hypothesis  testing  for  the 
variables  quantity,  quality,  and  variety  within  the 
ceramic  assemblages  of  the  boardinghouse  and 
tenement  indicate  that  only  the  variable 
quantity  can  be  reliably  related  to  household 
composition  and  social  standing.  Nuclear 
families,  such  as  those  who  commonly  lived  in 
the  tenements,  purchased  more  tableware  per 
person  indicating  a  more  specialized  meal 
service  and  presumably  more  genteel  dining 
ambiance  than  in  the  boardinghouse.  Test 
implications  for  quality  and  variety  produced  no 
significant  results,  primarily  because  both  the 
boardinghouse  and  tenement  residents  were 
operating  at  different  socioeconomic  levels 
within  the  same  class  and,  though  worthy  of  note, 
these  differences  were  not  great  enough  to 
produce  significant  statistical  patterning  in  the 
ceramic  assemblage. 


Dating 

Ceramic  terminus  post  quem  dates  were 
calculated  for  features  with  four  or  more  vessels 
present.  Dates  were  based  on  decorative  styles 
including  molded  patterns  in  addition  to 
manufacturer's  marks  found  within  the 
associated  feature  (Table  6-10). 


104    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Table  6-10.  Ceramic  terminus  post  quern  by 

feature. 

Feature  # 

Feature  type 

TPQ* 

Tenement 

Feature  25 

wall  disturbance 

1880 

Feature  27 

planting  hole 

1900 

Feature  43 

well 

1881 

Feature  45 

privy 

1880 

Boardinghouse 

Feature  7 

wall  disturbance 

1880 

Feature  61 

privy 

1900 

Feature  65 

planting  hole 

1830 

*TPQ  =  Terminus 

post  quern. 

Ceramic  Terminus  Post  Quern  by  Feature 

Operation  A 

Four  features  uncovered  in  the  tenement 
backlot  were  assigned  ceramic  terminus  post 
quern  dates.  Feature  25  was  the  designation 
given  to  the  fill  of  a  portion  of  the  cellar  of  the 
tenement  (see  Chapter  5,  this  volume).  A 
ceramic  terminus  post  quern  date  of  1880  was 
assigned  to  this  feature  based  on  the  presence  of 
an  unidentified  gold  gilded  whiteware  fragment. 

Feature  27  was  a  planting  hole  located  parallel 
to  the  rear  wall  of  the  tenement  and  in  between 
the  bulkhead  entrance  and  ell.  The  ceramic 
TPQ  of  1900  was  justified  by  the  presence  of  a 
banded  plate  that  had  a  series  of  concentric  blue 
and  red  bands  around  the  rim.  This  type  of 
decoration  was  popular  on  vessels  early  in  the 
20th  century  as  evidenced  by  their  appearance 
in  mail-order  catalogs  of  the  period  (Majewski 
and  O'Brien  1987:  160) 

A  well  located  to  the  north  of  the  tenement 
well  was  designated  as  Feature  43.  A  ceramic 
TPQ  of  1881  was  given  to  this  feature  because  its 
fill  produced  a  sherd  bearing  a  Knowles,  Taylor 
and  Knowles  Company  manufacturer's  mark. 
The  mark  exhibited  an  eagle  crest  along  with  the 
phrase  "Warenteed  Granite"  which  was  printed 
by  the  company  after  1881. 

Feature  45,  located  at  the  rear  of  the  tenement 
backlot,  was  a  privy.  A  porcelain  bowl  with  gold 
gilding  and  a  decal  decoration  provided  the 
justification  for  assigning  a  1880  ceramic  TPQ  for 
the  privy.  Decal  printed  designs  often  appeared 
in  conjunction  with  gold  gilding  (Henry  and 
Garrow  1982b:  468)  and  were  popular  on 
porcelain  wares  from  1880  to  1920  (Jacobs  1983: 
22). 


Operation   B 

The  boardinghouse  backlot  produced  3 
features  that  contained  4  or  more  vessels. 
Feature  7  was  a  trench  associated  with  the  ell 


foundation  of  the  boardinghouse.  An 
unidentified  porcelain  vessel  with  a  scalloped 
rim  displayed  gilding  that  was  identified  as 
liquid  gold.  This  technique  of  decoration  began 
to  appear  around  1880,  thus,  providing  the 
ceramic  TPQ  (Pittman  et  al.  1987:  54). 

Feature  61,  the  privy,  was  located  at  the  rear  of 
the  boardinghouse  backlot.  Its  fill  produced 
fragments  of  a  whiteware  cup  with  a  pink,  green, 
and  yellow  decal  decoration,  along  with  gold 
gilding.  Decal  decoration  on  earthenwares  did 
not  reach  popularity  until  after  1900,  thus 
providing  the  basis  for  assigning  a  ceramic  TPQ 
of  1900  to  the  privy. 

An  oblong  planting  hole  was  identified  as 
Feature  65  and  was  located  next  to  the  rear  wall 
of  the  boardinghouse  southwest  of  the  well.  A 
ceramic  TPQ  of  1830  was  assigned  to  the 
planting  hole  based  on  the  presence  of  a 
impressed  blue  shell  edged  plate.  The  blue 
decoration  was  applied  around  the  rim  over  the 
impressed  shell  motif,  a  technique  that  began  as 
early  as  1830  (Majewski  and  O'Brien  1987: 151). 

The  ceramic  terminus  post  quern  data 
indicate  that  all  the  features  analyzed,  except  for 
Feature  65,  were  filled  in  the  last  quarter  of  the 
19th  century  or  later.  These  relatively  late  dates 
are  a  result  of  the  late  infilling  of  features  (other 
artifact  analyses  suggest  even  later  dates — cf. 
Chapters  8,  9,  and  11,  this  volume)  and  the 
expected  lack  of  survival  of  earlier  deposits  (but 
see  Kelso  and  Fisher  in  Chapter  13,  this  volume). 


Manufacturer's  Marks 

Ceramic  vessels  often  have  marks  on  their 
bases  that  are  referred  to  as  backmarks.  These 
marks  are  usually  either  impressed,  stenciled, 
transfer  printed,  or  painted  on  the  bottom  of  the 
ceramic  vessel.  The  marks  may  be  applied  to 
the  vessel  using  any  of  a  variety  of  techniques  or 
a  combination  thereof,  such  as  incising  or 
scratching  the  soft  unfired  clay,  impressing  one 
or  more  stamps  into  the  unfired  paste  or  by 
painting,  transfer  printing  or  stenciling  over  or 
under  the  glaze  (Cushion  1980:  5).  A  careful  and 
thorough  analysis  of  these  marks  can  often 
reveal  information  regarding  the  date  of 
manufacture,  company  affiliation,  and 
importing  practices,  as  well  as  other  types  of 
marketing  information  (Majewski  and  O'Brien 
1987: 165). 

Many  of  the  backmarks  that  appear  on 
English  ceramics  of  the  19th  century  are 
characterized  by  sharply  defined  underglazed 
black  transfer  prints.  It  was  not  uncommon, 
however,  for  vessels  with  transfer  printed 
decorative    patterns    to    have   the   backmark 


Ceramic  Analysis    105 


printed  on  the  base  in  the  same  color  as  the 
transfer  printed  pattern.  There  were  three 
commonly  used  backmarks  motifs  (i.e.,  the  royal 
arms,  the  royal  garter,  and  the  Staffordshire 
knot),  to  which  were  frequently  added  the  name 
of  the  manufacturer.  In  addition  to  the  name  of 
the  manufacturer,  it  was  also  typical  for  the  type 
of  ware  to  be  printed  along  with  the  mark  (e.g., 
ironstone,  granite)  as  well  as  any  number  of 
workman's  marks  or  diamond-shaped  patent 
registration  symbols  (Majewski  and  O'Brien 
1987:  166).  Godden  points  out  that  other  designs 
that  appeared  rather  frequently  included  the 
Prince  of  Wales'  feather  crest,  crowns,  and  the 
eagle  (1964:  257).  It  was  a  common  practice  for 
English  potters  who  were  actively  pursuing  the 
American  market  to  incorporate  the  eagle  in 
some  fashion  into  their  marks  in  an  effort  to 
appeal  to  this  growing  and  potentially  profitable 
market. 

Unlike  English  pottery,  American  ceramics 
produced  before  1850  were  rarely  marked  with 
any  kind  of  symbol  whatsoever.  It  was  not  until 
after  1850  that  American  potters  began  the 
practice  of  marking  their  wares.  One  of  the 
reasons  that  has  been  given  for  the  sudden 
appearance  of  backmarks  on  American  pottery 
was  an  increased  effort  on  the  part  of  American 
pottery  manufacturers  to  shift  the  American 
consumers'  interests  from  the  traditional  English 
ceramic  market.  This  trend  was  particularly 
evident  when  familiar  English  symbols  were 
copied  by  American  potters  through  the  late 
1880s  (Gates  and  Ormerod  1982:  9-10). 

Printed  backmarks  on  American  ceramic 
vessels  generally  tend  to  be  blurred  and 
somewhat  difficult  to  read.  Overall,  American 
marks  are  of  distinctly  poorer  quality  than 
English  marks.  In  addition,  from  the  time  period 
of  1875  to  1910,  American  marks  were 
characterized  by  either  extremely  elaborate 
shapes  and  designs,  or  were  very  simple, 
exhibiting  only  the  company  name,  shape,  or 
name  of  the  pattern  in  script  or  block  letters 
(Majewski  and  O'Brien  1987:  167). 

Often,  a  search  of  the  documentary  sources  on 
ceramic  manufacturers  will  provide  the 
researcher  with  enough  information  to  safely 
assign  a  time  span  for  the  backmark  in  question; 
this  is  particularly  true  of  late  19th-century 
marked  wares.  A  frequently  used  benchmark  is 
the  enactment  of  the  McKinley  Tariff  Act  in  the 
United  States  in  1891.  In  essence,  this  bill  was 
designed  to  protect  American  industries  and 
sought  to  do  so  by  requiring  that  manufactured 
articles  of  various  materials,  that  were  imported 
into  the  United  States,  be  clearly  marked  with 
the  name  of  the  country  of  origin.    As  a  result, 


many  researchers  commonly  make  the  mistake 
of  jumping  to  the  conclusion  that  all  wares  that 
are  not  marked  with  the  country  of  origin 
predate  1891.  The  McKinley  Tariff  Act  was  put 
into  effect  on  October  6,  1890  (Collard  1984:  323). 
Therefore,  it  is  true  that  by  1891,  most  potters 
who  were  exporting  ceramic  vessels  to  the 
United  States  had  begun  to  mark  their  wares 
with  the  name  of  the  country  of  origin.  As  a 
general  rule,  when  the  phrase  "Made  in 
England"  appears  on  the  base  of  a  vessel,  as 
opposed  to  "England,"  the  piece  was 
manufactured  in  the  20th  century.  As  Collard 
notes,  this  does  not  necessarily  mean  that  when 
the  word  "England"  appears  alone  that  a 
particular  vessel  was  produced  in  the  19th 
century,  but  on  the  contrary,  that  the  phrase 
"Made  in  England"  will  only  appear  on  ceramic 
vessels  manufactured  in  the  20th  century  (1984: 
324). 

Two  final  notes  of  caution  should  be  heeded 
when  using  the  enactment  of  the  McKinley 
Tariff  Act  as  a  means  of  dating  ceramic  vessel 
backmarks.  First,  there  were  certainly  instances 
prior  to  the  tariff  act  of  1891  when  the  name  of 
the  country  was  applied  to  the  mark.  One  such 
example  can  be  found  in  the  printed  marks  used 
on  the  wares  produced  before  1890  by  Anthony 
Shaw  of  Burslem  (Collard  1984:  324).  Second,  it 
should  be  kept  in  mind  that  American  pottery 
manufacturers  were  under  no  obligation  by  the 
tariff  act  to  print  the  name  of  the  country  of 
origin  on  their  wares.  Therefore,  it  would  be 
quite  common  for  a  piece  of  white  ironstone  to 
have  no  printed  evidence  whatsoever  of  the 
country  of  origin  because  it  was  produced  in  the 
late  19th  or  early  20th  century  by  an  American 
potter. 

Extreme  care  should  be  exercised  when 
identifying  American-made  ceramics  of  the  late 
19th  century,  as  it  was  noted  earlier  that  it  was 
quite  common  for  American  manufacturers  to 
imitate  English  marks  on  their  wares  in  an 
attempt  to  increase  their  marketability.  A 
misidentification  of  a  mark  could  attribute  the 
mark  and  the  vessel  in  question  to  the  wrong 
country,  or  worse,  date  the  mark  earlier  than 
when  the  vessel  was  actually  made. 

Occasionally  one  will  find  a  date  incorporated 
in  the  backmark  on  the  base  of  a  vessel,  which  is 
oftentimes  mistaken  for  the  actual  date  of 
manufacture  for  the  piece.  As  Collard  points 
out,  this  date  more  than  likely  refers  to  founding 
of  the  factory  that  is  associated  with  the 
particular  mark  (1984:  324).  Hence  the  analyst 
must  avoid  drawing  unsubstantiated  conclusions 
when  there  is  a  printed  date  associated  with  the 
backmark. 


106   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


CLASS 


YEAR- 


MONTH- 


DAYOF 
MONTH 


PARCEL  NUMBER 


CLASS 


DAYOF  MONTH 


PARCEL- 
NUMBER 


-YEAR 


-MONTH 


Figure  6-12.  Diamond  trademark  registration.  (Reproduced  from  Godden  1964:527-528) 


Another  somewhat  useful  tool  for  the  dating  of 
backmarks  on  19th-century  ceramics  is  the  use 
of  the  word  "Limited"  or  an  abbreviation  of  the 
same  after  the  name  on  the  mark  of  the  English 
firm  that  produced  the  ware.  Marks  of  this  type 
always  date  after  the  mid-19th  century,  and 
more  frequently,  to  the  late  Victorian  period 
(Collard  1984: 324). 

Also,  the  use  of  the  word  'Trade  Mark"  or 
'Trademark,"  a  direct  result  of  the  passage  of 
the  Merchandise  Marks  Act  of  1862,  can  be 
helpful  in  assigning  dates  to  backmarks.  It  was 
not  common,  however,  for  the  actual  word 
'Trade  Mark"  to  appear  in  the  backmark  of  a 
vessel  until  after  August  13,  1875,  at  which  time 
the  Trade  Marks  Registration  Act  was  passed 
(Collard  1984: 324). 

One  of  the  most  reliable  dating  methods  for 
19th-century  ceramics  is  the  presence  of  a 
diamond-shaped  mark  that  indicates  that  the 
vessel  form  or  pattern  was  registered  with  the 
British  Patent  Office.  These  marks  can  be  dated 
with  relative  ease  to  within  a  few  years  of  the 
pattern's  registration.  The  diamond-shaped 
marks  were  either  printed  under  the  glaze  or 
impressed  into  the  paste  of  the  vessel  and  were 
used  from  1842  until  1883  (Collard  1984:  325).  In 
the  corners  of  the  diamond  are  found  letters  and 
numbers  that  form  a  code  giving  the  actual  year, 
month,  and  day  that  the  registration  was  granted 
(Figure  6-12).  At  times  it  is  also  possible,  by 
referring  to  the  Class  IV  Design  Index  from  the 
British  Public  Records  Office,  to  find  the  patent 
number  and  the  name  of  the  firm  that  registered 
the  design  (Majewski  and  O'Brien  1987: 168). 

The  key  to  the  code  for  deciphering  the  dates 
is  shown  below,  along  with  a  brief  discussion 
concerning  its  use.  The  dates  indicated  by  these 


registry  marks  simply  refer  to  the  earliest 
possible  date  that  an  item  could  have  been 
produced  under  that  particular  registration.  The 
initial  registration  of  a  form  or  design  lasted  only 
three  years,  and,  after  that  time  period  had 
elapsed,  a  new  registration  had  to  be  obtained. 
Thus,  registration  marks  can  only  be  used  to 
determine  terminus  post  quern  dates  since  a 
form  or  design  was  often  re-registered  after  its 
initial  three-year  period. 

At  the  top  of  the  diamond-shaped  registration 
mark  is  a  circle  with  a  Roman  numeral  inside. 
This  numeral  indicates  the  class  of  material 
affected  such  as  wood,  metal,  glass,  or  ceramics. 
All  ceramic  forms  were  registered  with  the 
Roman  numeral  IV.  From  1842-1867,  the 
number  located  directly  below  the  circle 
indicated  the  year;  the  letter  in  the  left-hand 
corner  of  the  diamond  represented  the  month, 
while  the  figure  in  the  right  portion  of  the 
diamond  referred  to  the  day  of  the  month. 
Finally,  the  number  positioned  at  the  base  of  the 
diamond  corresponded  to  the  parcel  number  for 
the  particular  documents  relating  to  the 
registration  that  were  filed  at  the  Patent  Office. 

This  arrangement  for  the  letters  and  numbers 
was  standard  for  diamond-shaped  registration 
marks  until  1868.  It  was  during  this  year  that  the 
positioning  of  the  numbers  and  letters  was 
changed,  and  a  new  code  was  devised  to  identify 
the  year  of  the  pattern  registration  (Collard  1984: 
327).  From  1868  until  diamond-shaped 
registration  marks  were  discontinued  in  1883,  the 
year  was  represented  by  the  letter  in  the  right- 
hand  corner  of  the  diamond;  the  month  was 
indicated  by  the  letter  at  the  bottom,  with  the 
day  of  the  month  appearing  directly  beneath  the 
Roman  numeral  IV.     The  parcel  number  for 


Ceramic  Analysis    107 


registrations  during  this  period  was  found  in  the 
left-hand  corner  of  the  mark. 

In  1884,  the  British  Patent  Office  replaced  the 
diamond-shaped  marks  with  registration 
numbers  (Majewski  and  O'Brien  1987:  169). 
These  numbers  were  imprinted  on  vessel  bases 
and  were  preceded  by  an  "Rd"  or  an  "Rd.No." 
By  the  end  of  the  19th  century,  the  numbers  had 
already  totaled  more  than  350,000  (Collard  1984: 
326;  Cushion  1980: 5). 

By  examining  backmarks  on  ceramic  vessels 
one  may  glean  the  name  of  the  company  that 
manufactured  the  ware,  in  addition  to  some 
approximation  of  the  time  frame  within  which 
the  vessel  was  produced.  Also,  the  styles  and 
colors  of  the  marks  under  study  often  provide 
information  regarding  the  nature  of  the  ware  or 
the  decorative  attributes  of  the  particular  vessel. 
For  instance,  Josiah  Spode  II  around  1800  began 
the  practice  of  printing  the  name  of  the  transfer 
printed  pattern  used  on  the  bottom  of  the  vessel 
(Majewski  and  O'Brien  1987:  169).  Little  notes 
that  soon  after  Spode  began  this  practice, 
pattern  names  began  to  appear  within 
ornamental  scrolls  and  that  by  the  period  1830  to 
1840,  inclusion  of  pattern  names  within  foliated 
and  flowery  cartouches  and  wreaths  was  a 
common  practice  throughout  the  ceramic 
industry  (1969:  35,  96).  Generally,  pattern  marks 
carried  no  information  concerning  the  company 
that  manufactured  the  piece;  it  has  been  noted, 
however,  that  on  occasion  one  might  be  able  to 
identify  the  pottery  by  examining  the  shape  of 
the  scroll  or  cartouche  in  which  the  pattern 
name  was  printed  (Little  1969:  31). 

For  the  19th  century,  the  majority  of  white 
ironstone  wares  produced  had  a  maker's  mark 
in  some  form,  along  with  the  company's  name, 
transfer  printed  in  black  on  the  base  of  the 
vessel.  Other  types  of  decorated  wares,  such  as 
spatterware,  banded  ware,  handpainted  floral  or 
shell  edge  ware,  and  the  majority  of  the  early  soft 
paste  porcelain,  were  seldom  marked  (Majewski 
and  O'Brien  1987: 170). 

In  sum,  a  thorough  and  careful  examination  of 
backmarks  on  the  base  of  ceramic  vessels  can 
frequently  provide  valuable  information.  Often 
it  is  possible  to  determine  the  date,  or  at  least  a 
relatively  precise  range,  when  the  vessel  was 
manufactured,  the  company  affiliation, 
importing  practices,  as  well  as  other  data 
relating  to  marketing  and  purchasing  patterns. 
Even  though  backmarks  seem  to  provide  the 
archeologist  with  precise  dates,  these  can  at 
times  be  misleading  and  hence  should  be 
analyzed  within  the  proper  historical  context  as 
well  as  within  the  contaxt  of  the  overall 
assemblage  in  which  they  occur. 


Archeological    Data 

Excavations  of  the  backlots  for  the  Boott  Mills 
units  #45  and  #48  yielded  a  total  of  45  ceramic 
vessel  fragments  with  some  portion  of  a 
manufacturer's  mark  visible.  In  addition  to 
these  45  fragments,  two  partial  marks  referred  to 
the  name  of  the  particular  pattern  used  to 
decorate  the  vessel.  None  of  the  sherds  had 
workman's  marks  that  would  have  been  placed 
on  the  vessel  by  the  actual  individual  who  made 
the  ceramic  item. 

Of  the  45  sherds  with  manufacturer's  marks, 
only  17  could  be  positively  traced  to  the 
company  that  produced  the  vessel  and  mark. 
The  two  transfer  printed  pattern  marks 
recovered  were  relatively  complete;  only  one 
could  be  identified  to  the  pattern  name  and 
manufacturer.  Following  is  a  detailed  discussion 
and  description,  proceeding  by  operation  and 
provenience,  of  those  marks  that  were 
identifiable. 


Operation  A 

Four  ceramic  vessel  fragments  with 
identifiable  backmarks  were  recovered  from 
excavations  of  the  backlot  associated  with  the 
Boott  Mills  unit  #48,  a  former  tenement.  In 
addition  to  the  three  maker's  marks,  one  vessel 
fragment  bore  a  portion  of  an  identifiable 
pattern  mark. 


SAMPSON,  BRIDGEWOOD  &  SON  (LTD)  8N10W1 

The  partial  base  of  a  small  whiteware  plate  was 
retrieved  during  excavations  in  Operation  A 
from  the  provenience  8N10W  level  1,  inside  the 
foundation  of  unit  #48.  Transfer  printed  on  the 
base  is  approximately  one-half  of  the  remaining 
manufacturers  mark.  The  actual  mark  is  printed 
in  a  light  reddish  brown  color  and  displays  a 
portion  of  a  crest,  alongside  the  name  of  the 
pottery,  which  appears  underneath  the  crest. 
Also  appearing  at  the  top  of  the  crest  are  the  two 
letters  "PO.  .  .,"  possibly  referring  to  pottery 
(Figure  6-13).  This  particular  mark  was 
identified  as  being  produced  by  Sampson, 
Bridgewood  &  Son  (Ltd)  of  the  Anchor  Pottery, 
Longton,  Staffordshire  (Godden  1964:  101).  The 
pottery  was  established  in  1805  and  was  known 
for  its  manufacture  of  earthenware  and 
porcelain,  which  it  produced  prior  to  1887 
(Godden  1964:  101).  It  was  not  until  1853, 
however,  that  Sampson,  Bridgewood  &  Son  (Ltd) 
began  printing  marks  on  their  ceramic  vessels. 
By  1884,  one  begins  to  see  variations  in  the  types 
of  printed  crests  for  this  company.    The  actual 


108    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


mark  recovered  at  Lowell  is  such  a  variation,  and 
therefore  can  be  accurately  dated  to  post-1884. 
Since  this  particular  vessel  was  manufactured  in 
England,  the  absence  of  the  word  "England"  in 
the  maker's  mark  helps  us  to  date  the 
production  of  this  item  much  more  closely  to 
between  the  years  1884  and  1891. 


AMERICAN  CROCKERY  COMPANY  2N4W 
(FEATURE  24) 

An  identifiable  maker's  mark  was  retrieved 
from  feature  24,  a  dark  circular  soil  stain 
believed  to  be  a  post  hole,  that  was  located  in 
provenience  2N4W.  This  particular  ceramic 
sherd  is  from  an  unidentifiable  vessel  form,  and 
once  again,  only  displays  approximately  one-half 
of  the  transfer  printed  maker's  mark.  Printed  in 
black,  the  mark  exhibits  the  royal  arms  with  the 
words  "IRO[NSTONE  CHINA)"  printed  above 
(Figure  6-14).  This  mark  was  found  to  belong  to 
the  American  Crockery  Company,  Trenton,  New 
Jersey,  which  began  producing  bisque  and  white 
granite  wares  in  1876  Marks  of  American  Potters 
(Barber  1904:  59-60).  A  clue  for  the  dating  of  this 
piece  was  that  the  American  Crockery  Co.  did 
not  start  printing  this  particular  mark  on  white 
granite  ware  in  black  until  ca.  1890  (Barber  1904: 
59-60).  Thus,  we  can  safely  say  that  this  vessel 
was  manufactured  sometime  after  ca.  1890.  The 
use  of  the  royal  arms  by  the  American  Crockery 
Co.  is  a  good  example  of  an  American  pottery 
imitating  British  marks.  As  was  mentioned 
earlier,  this  practice  became  quite  popular  in  the 
late  19th  century  as  American  firms  attempted 
various  marketing  strategies  to  lure  the 
American  consumer  away  from  the  traditionally 
British  dominated  ceramic  market  (Gates  and 
Ormerod  1982:  9-10). 


KNOWLES,  TAYLOR  AND  KNOWLES  COMPANY 
8N6W  (FEATURE  43  LEVEL  E) 

A  whiteware  ceramic  sherd  with  an 
identifiable  maker's  mark  was  excavated  from 
level  E  of  feature  43  in  provenience  8N6W.  This 
feature  was  a  well  and  was  not  fully  excavated 
because  of  safety  precautions.  The  fragment  is 
from  an  unidentifiable  vessel  form  and  has  a 
maker's  mark  transfer  printed  in  black  on  the 
base.  The  mark  consists  of  a  crest  along  with  the 
word  "WAR[RENTEED1"  printed  along  the  top  of 
the  crest  and  the  initials  "K.T.[K]"  across  the 
bottom  with  "CRANIJTE  WARE]"  printed  beneath 
(Figure  6-15).  The  manufacturer  was  identified 
as  the  Knowles,  Taylor  &  Knowles  Company 
which  of  East  Liverpool,  Ohio.  The  company  was 
established  in  1854  by  Isaac  W.  Knowles  and 


Isaac  A.  Harvey  (Barber  1904:  108-109).  The  two 
individuals  began  the  pottery  works  with  one  kiln 
producing  predominantly  yellow  wares.  In  1870 
Mr.  Knowles,  who  by  this  time  had  become  the 
sole  proprietor,  formed  a  partnership  with  Col. 
John  N.  Taylor  and  Homer  S.  Knowles. 
Approximately  two  years  later  the  company 
began  their  first  production  of  white  granite  ware 
(Barber  1904:  108-109).  In  1891  Joseph  G.  Lee 
and  Willis  A.  Knowles  joined  the  firm,  at  which 
time  a  stock  company  was  incorporated  under 
the  name  of  Knowles,  Taylor  &  Knowles  Co.  Of 
the  various  products  manufactured,  the  most 
prominent,  was  the  white  granite,  semivitreous 
porcelain,  and  hotel  china  (Barber  1904:  108- 
109).  The  presence  of  the  eagle  crest  along  with 
the  phrase  "WAR[RENTEED  GRANITE]"  indicates 
that  this  particular  vessel  was  in  use  after  1881. 
The  actual  date  range,  however,  can  be  large  as 
Knowles,  Taylor  &  Knowles  Co.  are  still  in 
business  today,  operating  approximately  35  kilns 
and  employing  upwards  of  700  individuals 
(Barber  1904:  108-109). 


JOHN  ALCOCK  POTTERY  4N0W  (FEATURE  45  LEVEL 
A) 

One  whiteware  tea  cup  fragment  was  obtained 
from  feature  45  level  A  which  was  defined  as  the 
privy  in  provenience  4N0W  located  at  the  rear 
of  the  backlot  for  the  tenement  unit  #48.  The 
vessel  has  panelled  sides  and  displays  a 
complete  diamond-shaped  registration  symbol 
that  is  transfer  printed  in  black.  This  particular 
mark  contains  the  name  of  the  manufacturer, 
which  is  printed  above  the  mark,  as  well  as  the 
location  of  the  pottery,  which  is  printed  below  the 
mark  (Figure  6-16).  The  vessel  was  produced  by 
the  John  Alcock  Pottery,  Cobridge,  Staffordshire 
Potteries.  This  particular  pottery  was  in 
operation  from  1853  until  1861  and  produced 
predominantly  earthenwares  (Godden  1964:  27). 
The  company  was  later  named  Henry  Alcock  & 
Co.  and  was  known  for  its  distinguishing  detail 
on  marks  of  differing  designs  (Godden  1964:  27). 
The  vessel's  diamond-shaped  registration  mark 
can  be  dated  to  within  three  years  of  the  actual 
date  of  manufacture,  with  the  aid  of  a  code 
provided  by  Godden  (1964).  For  this  particular 
mark,  the  year  of  the  patent  design  appears  in 
the  upper  portion  of  the  diamond  under  the 
class  IV  indicating  that  this  registration  was  of 
the  kind  in  use  between  the  years  1842  and  1867. 
The  decoding  of  the  mark  points  to  the  date  of 
registration  as  March  21,  1848  with  the  actual 
parcel  number  being  8.  Because  enough  of  the 
tea  cup  exists  to  safely  determine  that  the  vessel 
was  undecorated,  it  can  then  be  inferred  that  it 


Ceramic  Analysis    109 


£ 


4 


k 


m 

■ . 

Figure  6-13.  Sampson,  Bridgewood  &  Son  (LTD) 
of  the  Anchor  Pottery,  Longton,  Staffordshire 
Potteries  (1884-1891).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.) 


Figure  6-14.  American  Crockery  Company, 
Trenton,  New  Jersey  (post-1890).  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


d 

1 

I 

Figure  6-15.  Knowles,  Taylor  &  Knowles 
Company,  East  Liverpool,  Ohio  (post-1881). 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  6-16.  John  Alcock  Pottery,  Cobridge, 
Staffordshire  Potteries  (1848-1851).  (Photograph 
by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


110    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  6-17.  U.  &  R.  Boote  Ltd,  Waterloo, 
Burslem,  Staffordshire  Potteries  (1853-1856). 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  6-18.    John  Edwards  &  Company,  King 
Street,  Fenton,  Staffordshire  Potteries 
(1891-1900).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  6-19.  Homer  Laughlin  China  Company, 
East  Liverpool,  Ohio  (1879-1897),  pattern  mark 
"Colonial"  printed  beneath.  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure    6-20.        Warwick    China    Company, 
Wheeling,  West  Virginia  (1879-1900). 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Ceramic  Analysis    111 


was  the  form  of  the  vessel  that  was  registered 
with  the  Patent  Office  and  not  the  decoration. 
As  Majewski  and  O'Brien  have  noted,  potters 
did  not  register  all  of  their  wares,  but  generally 
only  those  that  they  thought  were  likely  to  be 
copied  (1987: 169).  Therefore,  it  is  quite  probable 
that  this  particular  tea  cup  represented  a  rather 
popular  form  during  the  mid-  to  late  19th 
century.  Once  again,  registrations  were  only 
valid  for  three  years,  thus,  this  particular  vessel 
was  manufactured  sometime  during  the  period 
March  21, 1848  to  March  21, 1851. 


REGINA  PATTERN,  ENOCH  WOOD  &  SONS  2N8W 
(FEATURE  27) 

One  whiteware  plate  fragment  with  a  partial 
transfer  printed  pattern  mark  was  recovered 
from  feature  27  which  is  a  large  oblong  dark  soil 
stain  believed  to  be  a  planting  hole  located  in 
provenience  2N8W.  On  the  base  of  the  plate 
near  the  footring,  slightly  off-center,  appears  a 
partial  transfer  printed  pattern  mark  in  the  same 
color  as  the  floral  pattern  on  the  interior  of  the 
plate.  The  actual  pattern  name  is  printed  on  a 
banner  that  is  draped  across  a  floral  design, 
once  again  similar  to  that  which  is  displayed  on 
the  interior  of  the  plate.  The  name  of  the 
pattern,  "Regina,"  is  printed  in  block  letters  with 
the  partial  name  of  the  manufacturer,  Enoch 
Wood  and  Sons,  printed  underneath.  This 
particular  pottery  was  in  operation  from  1759  to 
1846. 


Operation  B 

A  total  of  13  ceramic  vessel  fragments  was 
recovered  from  Operation  B  excavations  in  the 
backlot  of  the  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse  unit 
#45.  These  artifacts  will  be  discussed  in  the 
following  paragraphs  along  with  descriptions 
and  information  relating  to  the  manufacturers. 


T.  MCNICOL  POTTERY  17N0W1, 19N8W1 

A  single  tea  cup  saucer  fragment  and  a  small 
plain  saucer  fragment,  both  with  a  similar  black 
transfer  printed  maker's  mark  on  the  base  were 
recovered  archeologically  from  proveniences 
17N0W  level  1  and  19N8W  level  1  respectively. 
The  symbol  used  by  the  manufacturer  consists 
of  a  shield  flanked  by  a  lion  and  a  unicorn  with 
an  eagle  overhead.  Above  this  crest  appears  the 
word  "WARRENTEED"  while  below  is  the  potter's 
name.     The  mark  on  these  particular  saucers 


belonged  to  the  D.E.  McNicol  Pottery  Company 
which  was  in  operation  from  1892  until  1954 
(Gates  and  Ormerod  1982:  185-186).  The 
company  came  about  as  a  result  of  a  takeover  by 
Daniel  Edward  McNicol,  who  in  1892  became 
the  president  of  McNicol,  Burton  and  Company 
which  preceded  D.E.  McNicol  Pottery  Co.  (Gates 
and  Ormerod  1982:  185-186).  The  pottery  was 
most  noted  for  its  production  of  yellow  ware, 
Rockingham  ware,  and  white  ironstone  which  it 
marketed  as  "semi-granite"  ware.  In  1902  the 
firm  purchased  a  second  plant  that  it  devoted 
solely  to  the  manufacture  of  Rockingham  and 
yellow  wares  while  it  continued  to  produce 
ironstone  at  the  original  works.  In  addition  to  the 
purchase  of  a  second  plant,  a  new  large  pottery 
was  built  at  Clarksburg,  West  Virginia  in  1914 
while  a  fourth  plant  was  added  five  years  later  in 
East  Liverpool,  Ohio.  During  the  first  quarter  of 
the  20th  century,  the  D.E.  McNicol  Co.  produced 
hotel,  dinner,  and  toilet  wares  in  semi-granite, 
semi-porcelain,  and  cream-colored  ware.  The 
firm  also  continued  to  manufacture  yellow  ware 
products  as  late  as  1927,  which  made  them  the 
last  pottery  in  East  Liverpool  to  produce  vessels 
from  the  local  clay  (Gates  and  Ormerod  1982: 
185-186).  The  specialties  of  the  D.E.  McNicol 
Co.  were  cited  as  calendar  and  souvenir  plates 
that  were  produced  in  a  variety  of  styles  and 
decorative  motifs.  The  West  Virginia  plant,  on 
the  other  hand,  concentrated  on  plain  white  and 
vitrified  china  for  "  cafes,  clubs,  hotels,  hospitals, 
institutions,  railroads,  restaurants,  and 
steamships."  The  two  saucers  recovered 
archeologically  displayed  manufacturer's  marks 
that  were  used  by  the  D.E.  McNicol  Co.  after 
1900.  Unfortunately  not  enough  of  the  vessels 
survived  to  be  able  to  determine  whether  or  not 
the  pieces  were  decorated,  and  thus,  from  which 
plant  they  possibly  came. 


U.  &  R.  BOOTE  LTD.   17N0W  (FEATURE  61) 

Feature  61,  which  is  a  stone  lined  privy  located 
in  provenience  17N0W  at  the  rear  of  the  backlot 
for  boardinghouse  unit  #45,  contained  one 
whiteware  fragment  with  an  identifiable  maker's 
mark.  Unfortunately,  there  is  not  enough  of  the 
sherd  remaining  to  determine  the  precise  form 
of  the  vessel.  On  the  base  of  this  fragment  is  a 
circular  stamp  at  the  top  of  which  is  the  partial 
manufacturer's  name,  "BOOTE"  and  at  the 
bottom  the  name  of  the  style  of  the  vessel, 
"SYDENHAM  SHAPE"  (Figure  6-17).  The  mark 
was  identified  as  that  of  T.&  R.  Boote  Ltd. 
Waterloo,  Burslem,  Staffordshire  Potteries.  The 
firm  was  established  in  1842  and  was  known  for 
its  production  of  earthenwares,  parian  wares, 


112    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  6-21.    Cook  Pottery  Company,  Trenton, 
New  Jersey  (post-1894). 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  6-22.  International  Pottery  Company, 
Trenton,  New  Jersey  (post-1903).  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  6-23.  Taylor,  Smith  &  Taylor  Company, 
East  Liverpool,  Ohio  (post-1901).  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  6-24.  Goodwin  Pottery,  East  Liverpool, 
Ohio  (post-1844).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.) 


Ceramic  Analysis    113 


and  tiles  (Godden  1964:  526-527).  In  the  center 
of  the  circular  stamp  is  a  diamond-shaped 
registration  mark,  indicating  that  the  vessel  form 
was  registered  with  the  British  Patent  Office. 
This  particular  ceramic  fragment  has  the  code 
for  the  year  printed  in  the  top  corner  of  the 
diamond  which  corresponds  with  a  date  for 
pattern  registration  of  1853.  The  other  codes 
indicate  that  it  was  actually  on  September  3, 1853 
when  this  pattern,  the  "SYDENHAM  SHAPE"  was 
registered.  The  parcel  number,  which  is  located 
at  the  bottom,  is  two.  As  always,  one  must  keep 
in  mind  that  pattern  registrations  were  good  for 
only  three  years  before  they  had  to  be  renewed. 
As  a  result,  this  particular  vessel  was  produced 
sometime  between  September  3,  1853  and 
September  3,  1856. 


FRENCH  CHINA  COMPANY  17N2W  LEVEL  1 

One  small  whiteware  fragment  was  retrieved 
from  the  provenience  17N2W  level  1  in  the 
backlot  of  unit  #45.  Unfortunately,  the  sherd  is 
too  small  to  be  able  to  identify  the  actual  type  of 
vessel,  however,  there  is  enough  remaining  of 
the  base  with  the  associated  maker's  mark  to  be 
able  to  determine  the  manufacturer  of  the  ware. 
The  partial  mark  is  transfer  printed  in  a  light 
reddish  brown  color  with  the  letters  "FRANC.  . ." 
in  script  visible.  This  mark  belonged  to  the 
French  China  Company  that  operated  out  of 
East  Liverpool,  Ohio  (Gates  and  Ormerod  1982: 
47-49).  The  company  was  organized  by  the 
Sebring  brothers  and  began  operation  in  1898. 
The  firm  was  locally  known  as  "klondyke" 
because  of  its  great  distance  from  the  center  of 
town  (Gates  and  Ormerod  1982:  47^9).  The 
pottery  was  best  known  for  its  production  of 
semi-porcelain  dinner,  tea,  and  toilet  wares  in 
addition  to  "special  novelties."  In  1901  the 
company  moved  its  plant  to  Sebring  ,  Ohio 
because  the  owners  stated  that  they  were,  "...not 
content  to  follow  the  antiquated  methods  of  a 
past  generation..."  (Gates  and  Ormerod  1982:  47- 
49).  At  the  new  plant,  they  did  continued  to 
produce  their  quality  semi-porcelain  wares.  In 
1916  O.H.  Sebring  formed  the  Sebring 
Manufacturing  Corporation  which  functioned  as 
a  holding  company  for  French  China,  Strong 
Manufacturing  Co.,  and  the  Saxon  China  Co., 
however,  it  was  clear  that  each  company 
continued  to  operate  independently  until  1929  at 
which  time  the  holding  company  joined  the 
American  Chinaware  Corporation.  The  mark  on 
the  fragment  recovered  from  Operation  B 
excavations  is  an  example  of  the  French  China 
Company's  mark  displayed  on  semivitreous 


wares   from  ca.   1898  until   1916  (Gates  and 
Ormerod  1982:  47^9). 


JOHN  EDWARDS  &  CO.   19N4W1 

A  whiteware  ceramic  sherd  from  an 
unidentified  vessel  form  was  recovered  during 
excavations  of  provenience  19N4W  level  1  in 
Operation  B.  The  mark  present  on  the  base  of 
the  fragment  is  transfer  printed  in  black  and 
bears  the  partial  name  of  the  manufacturer, 
"JOHN  EDWARDS,"  as  well  as  the  word 
"TRADEMARK"  and  "ENGLAND"  (Figure  6-18). 
This  mark  was  a  product  of  the  John  Edwards  & 
Co.,  King  Street,  Fenton,  Staffordshire  Potteries. 
The  Edwards  pottery  began  operation  in  1847 
and  ceased  producing  ceramic  wares  in  1900 
(Godden  1964:  231).  The  company  started 
marking  its  wares  with  various  impressed  or 
printed  marks  of  differing  designs  from  ca.  1847 
until  1873.  At  this  time,  "&  Co."  was  added  to  the 
mark  for  the  remainder  of  the  firms  operating 
days  (Godden  1964:  231).  The  actual  mark 
recovered  from  behind  Boott  Mills  unit  #45 
offers  several  clues  leading  to  the  determination 
of  a  date  of  manufacture.  To  begin  with,  the 
style  of  the  mark  is  indicative  of  that  used  by  the 
John  Edwards  Co.  for  the  period  1880  to  1900 
(Godden  1964:  231).  In  addition  to  the  actual 
style  of  the  mark,  the  presence  of  the  word 
"ENGLAND"  indicates  that  this  particular  vessel 
was  manufactured  after  1890  when  the  McKinley 
Tariff  Act  was  put  into  effect.  Likewise,  the 
appearance  of  the  word  'Trademark"  further 
demonstrates  that  the  piece  was  produced  at 
least  after  1875  when  the  Trade  Marks 
Registration  Act  was  passed  (Collard  1984:  324). 
This  information  allows  us  to  say  confidently  that 
this  fragment  of  John  Edwards  &  Co. 
manufactured  vessel  was  produced  sometime 
between  1891  and  1900  when  the  company 
ceased  to  produce  ceramic  wares. 


HOMER  LAUGHLIN  CHINA  COMPANY  19N6W1 

The  fragments  of  a  small  plate  were  collected 
from  provenience  19N6W  level  1  which  is 
located  in  the  backlot  of  unit  #45.  The  plate 
fragments  have  a  decalcomania  floral 
decoration  on  the  interior  in  pink,  blue,  and 
green.  On  the  base  is  evidence  of  a  partial 
maker's  mark  that  was  transfer  printed  in  a  light 
olive  green  color  (Figure  6-19).  The  mark 
belongs  to  the  Homer  Laughlin  China  Company 
which  operated  from  East  Liverpool,  Ohio.  The 
pottery  was  founded  by  Homer  and 
Shakespeare  Laughlin  and  functioned  under  the 
name  of  Laughlin  Brothers  (Barber  1904:  110- 


314    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


111).  From  1879  until  1897,  Homer  operated  the 
business  alone  and  in  the  latter  year  the  name 
changed  to  the  Homer  Laughlin  China 
Company  (Barber  1904:  110-111).  The  factory 
manufactured  predominantly  white  granite 
ware,  although  in  later  years  semivitreous  china 
and  higher  grade  wares  were  produced.  On  the 
white  granite  wares,  the  mark  used  by  this 
company  reflected  the  supremacy  of  American 
ceramic  wares  over  British  ceramics — an 
American  eagle  standing  over  the  British  lion. 
This  same  mark  was  also  displayed  with  a  ring  on 
semivitreous  china  toilet  and  table  services  with 
the  name  of  the  pattern  being  printed  beneath, 
such  as  "COLONIAL,"  "GOLDEN  GATE,"  and  "AN 
AMERICAN  BEAUTY"  (Barber  1904:  110-111). 
The  particular  plate  fragment  that  was 
recovered  during  excavations  of  Operation  B 
was  just  such  a  mark  with  the  pattern  name 
being  "COLONIAL." 


WARWICK  CHINA  COMPANY   19N8W1 

Provenience  19N8W1,  located  in  a  corner 
between  the  ell  extension  and  the  rear  of  unit 
#45,  yielded  a  small  fragment  of  whiteware  from 
an  unidentifiable  vessel.  Printed  on  the  base  of 
this  fragment  is  the  partial  word  ".  .  .RWICK"  in 
black  transfer  printed  block  letters  (Figure  6-20). 
The  mark  belongs  to  the  Warwick  China 
Company  which  was  located  in  Wheeling,  West 
Virginia.  The  pottery  was  organized  in  1887  and 
produced  mainly  semi-porcelain  toilet  and  table 
goods  (Barber  1904:  152).  The  first  manufacturer 
marks  used  by  the  Warwick  China  Co.  were 
characterized  by  a  helmet  and  crossed  swords 
which  was  later  adopted  around  1892  for  the 
marking  of  novelties  in  semi-porcelain  (Barber 
1904: 152).  From  1893  until  1898,  the  "WARWICK 
SEMI- PORCELAIN"  mark  was  used  and  from  1898 
until  the  present,  the  ware  has  been  stamped 
with  the  name  "WARWICK  CHINA"  (Barber 
1904: 152).  Because  so  little  of  the  actual  maker's 
mark  exists,  one  would  be  hard  pressed  to  place 
the  date  of  manufacture  for  this  piece  to  any 
time  period  other  than  sometime  after  the 
founding  of  the  pottery  in  1887. 

A  second  whiteware  ceramic  fragment  was 
recovered  from  the  same  provenience,  19N8W 
level  1.  The  medium  size  bowl  base  sherd 
displays  a  green  transfer  printed  mark  with  a 
floral  wreath  and  a  globe  in  the  center  (Figure  6- 
23).  This  particular  mark  was  used  by  the 
Burford  Brothers  Pottery  Company  which  was 
located  in  East  Liverpool,  Ohio.  The  pottery  was 
in  operation  from  1879  until  1900  and  specialized 
in  plain  white  and  decorated  semi-porcelain 
wares  (Thome  1947:  120).    During  the  course  of 


their  existence,  the  Burford  Brothers  Pottery 
used  a  variety  of  marks  such  as  a  shield  that  was 
displayed  on  their  general  ware,  and  the  word 
"HOTEL"  which  was  printed  on  their  hotelwares, 
in  addition  to  several  other  marks  including  the 
one  represented  in  the  Lowell  assemblage 
(Barber  1904:  116).  Because  there  are  no  precise 
indicators  as  to  the  date  of  manufacture  for  this 
particular  mark,  we  can  only  say  that  the  vessel 
was  produced  sometime  during  the  operational 
lifetime  of  the  pottery,  1879  to  1900. 


COOK  POTTERY  COMPANY  19N10W1 

A  small  whiteware  fragment  was  recovered 
from  the  provenience  19N10W  level  1  which  was 
located  next  to  the  rear  foundation  wall  of  unit 
#45.  The  sherd  is  from  a  vessel  whose  form  is 
unidentifiable  and  exhibited  no  form  of 
decoration  save  for  the  maker's  mark  transfer 
printed  on  the  base.  The  mark  is  a  circular 
pattern  with  the  name  of  the  pottery  around  the 
interior  of  the  circle  and  a  small  insignia  in  the 
center  (Figure  6-21).  This  particular  mark 
belonged  to  the  Cook  Pottery  Company  of 
Trenton,  New  Jersey.  The  company  was 
organized  in  the  early  part  of  1894  succeeding  to 
the  business  of  Messrs.  Ott  &  Brewer  (Barber 
1904:  54).  The  officers  of  the  firm  were  Charles 
Howell  Cook,  President;  F.G.  Mellor,  Vice- 
President  and  Treasurer,  and  James  J. 
Mulheron,  Secretary  (Barber  1904:  54).  Primarily 
two  marks  were  printed  on  their  porcelain  dinner 
ware,  one  being  composed  of  three  feathers  and 
the  other,  which  is  of  the  type  excavated  from 
behind  Boott  Mills  unit  #45,  was  a  circle  that 
enclosed  the  combined  names  of  Etruria  and 
Mellor  &  Co.  (Barber  1904:  54).  Once  again  from 
the  evidence  available,  we  can  only  safely  say 
that  this  particular  vessel  was  produced 
sometime  after  the  organization  of  the  pottery  in 
the  early  months  of  1894. 


INTERNATIONAL  POTTERY  COMPANY  23N4W1 

Provenience  23N4W1  yielded  a  small 
whiteware  fragment  bearing  an  identifiable 
black  transfer  printed  manufacturer's  mark  on 
the  base.  The  mark  was  determined  to  be  one 
that  was  used  by  the  International  Pottery 
Company  which  operated  out  of  Trenton,  New 
Jersey.  The  firm  was  established  in  1860  by 
Henry  Speeler  and  began  later  in  1868  to 
operate  under  the  name  of  Henry  Speeler  & 
Sons  (Barber  1904:  58-59).  In  1879,  Edward  Clark 
and  James  Carr  purchased  the  Speeler  pottery 
works  and  organized  the  Lincoln  Pottery 
Company.    The  manufacturer's  mark  adopted 


Ceramic  Analysis    115 


by  this  company  was  a  mark  with  the  name  of 
the  firm  and  the  names  Carr  &  Clark  printed 
beneath.  After  a  few  months  of  operation,  when 
the  company  was  reorganized  by  the 
International  Pottery  Company,  the  mark  was 
continued  with  the  exception  of  the  successor's 
names,  Burgess  and  Campbell,  were  substituted 
(Barber  1904:  58-59).  In  fact,  after  the 
reorganization,  a  variety  of  marks  began  to 
appear.  For  semi-porcelainwares,  particularly 
on  certain  patterns  of  underglazed  ware,  a 
circular  stamp  was  impressed  while  the  mark 
"INTERNATIONAL  CHINA"  was  frequently  used 
on  the  same  grade  of  ware.  On  semi-porcelain 
tablewares  with  blue  decorations  under  the 
glaze,  the  "ROYAL  BLUE"  marks  were  printed  in 
the  same  color.  Likewise,  a  similar  mark  was 
used  on  toilet  and  dinnerware  of  the 
"BALMORAL"  pattern.  Other  pattern  marks  that 
were  printed  on  toilet  and  tablewares  were 
"ALBANY,"  "JAPONICA,"  "LOTUS,"  and 
"DIAMOND"  (Barber  1904:  58-59).  After  Mr. 
Campbell  left  from  the  company,  the  style  of  the 
mark  was  changed  to  simply  "BURGESS  &  CO." 
The  mark  that  was  displayed  on  "Royal  China" 
in  1903  was  of  a  crown  in  a  circle  which 
corresponds  with  the  mark  recovered  in 
Operation  B  behind  unit  #45  (Figure  6-22).  A 
later  period  manufacturer's  mark  used  by  the 
International  Pottery  Co.,  mostly  on  their 
semivitreous  porcelain,  was  the  Maltese  cross. 
Therefore,  it  can  be  inferred  that  the  fragment 
represented  in  the  Lowell  collection  was 
produced  sometime  after  1903 


TAYLOR  SMITH  &  TAYLOR  COMPANY  23N4W1 

A  light  green  maker's  mark  was  identified  on  a 
small  whiteware  vessel  fragment  that  was 
recovered  from  the  provenience  23N4W  level  1. 
The  mark  belonged  to  the  Taylor,  Smith  &  Taylor 
Company  of  East  Liverpool,  Ohio.  The  original 
company  of  Taylor,  Lee  &  Smith  was 
incorporated  in  1899  and  was  the  predecessor  of 
the  present  Taylor,  Smith  &  Taylor  which 
assumed  operations  on  October  1,  1901  (Barber 
1904:  116).  The  primary  product  manufactured 
by  the  pottery  was  semivitreous  porcelain. 
Subjoined  are  the  marks  of  the  original  company 
for  semi-porcelain  and  white  granite.  The  marks 
used  by  the  present  company  were  shown  for  the 
same  types  of  wares  (Barber  1904:  116).  The 
mark  visible  on  the  ceramic  sherd  recovered 
from  the  rear  of  unit  #45  consists  of  a  winged  lion 
[griffin]  below  which  are  three  circles  that 
contain  the  letters  "T.S.T"  under  which  are 
printed  the  names  "TAYLOR,  SMITH  &  TAYLOR" 
(Figure  6-23).     Because  the  mark  is  from  the 


Taylor,  Smith  &  Taylor  Co.,  we  know  that  the 
vessel  was  manufactured  sometime  after  1901. 


GOODWIN  POTTERY  COMPANY  23N6W1 

A  black  transfer  printed  manufacturer's  mark 
was  excavated  from  the  provenience  23N6W 
level  1  in  the  vicinity  of  a  brick  drain  box  located 
behind  boardinghouse  unit  #45.  The  mark, 
which  is  on  a  piece  of  whiteware,  belonged  to  the 
Goodwin  Pottery  Company  of  East  Liverpool, 
Ohio.  John  Goodwin  established  the  pottery  in 
1844  primarily  for  the  production  of  yellow  and 
Rockingham  wares  (Barber  1904:  105-106).  In 
1876,  after  the  death  of  Mr.  Goodwin,  his  sons 
took  over  and  in  1893  the  Goodwin  Pottery 
Company  was  incorporated.  Their  products 
consisted  of  pearl,  white,  cream-colored, 
decorated  wares,  semi-porcelain  and  ironstone 
china  or  white  granite  (Barber  1904:  105-106). 
The  particular  mark  represented  from 
Operation  B  excavations  at  Lowell  consists  of  a 
printed  coat-of-arms  under  which  is  a  banner 
that  says  "IRON  STONE  CHINA."  Below  this 
banner  is  a  date,  "1844"  which  is  an  excellent 
example  of  a  printed  date  on  a  mark  indicating 
when  the  particular  company  was  established 
(Collard  1984:  324).  Finally,  beneath  the 
founding  date  is  printed  in  block  letters: 
"GOODWIN'S"  (Figure  6-24). 


WEST  END  POTTERY  COMPANY  19N6W1 

A  large  undecorated  serving  platter  was 
recovered  archeologically  from  the  provenience 
19N6W  level  1  and  crossmended  with  fragments 
from  the  same  vessel  retrieved  from  excavation 
unit  23N4W  level  1,  all  from  Operation  B.  On 
the  bottom  of  the  platter  is  a  simple  maker's 
mark  in  black  transfer  print  that  reads 
"W.E.P.CO."  with  the  word  "CHINA"  printed  in 
block  letters  beneath  (Figure  6-25).  This 
particular  mark  was  used  by  the  West  End 
Pottery  Company  of  East  Liverpool,  Ohio.  The 
company  was  organized  in  1893  having 
succeeded  Messrs.  Burgess  &  Co.  (Barber  1904: 
117).  The  primary  products  of  the  pottery  were 
ironstone  china  and  fine  decorated  ware. 
Unfortunately,  with  the  limited  amount  of  data 
available  on  this  particular  mark,  little  more  can 
be  said,  at  this  point,  other  than  that  the  serving 
platter  retrieved  from  behind  unit  #45  was 
produced  sometime  after  1893. 


1 16    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


I 
I 


Figure  6-25.   West  End  Pottery  Company,  East  Liverpool,  Ohio  (post-1893).   (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.) 


m 


Figure  6-26.   Potter's  Co-operative  Company,  East  Liverpool,  Ohio  (post-1876).   (Photograph  by  Richard 
S.  Kanaski.) 


Ceramic  Analysis    117 


POTTER'S  CO-OPERATIVE  COMPANY  TRENCH  #2 
LEVEL 9D 

A  medium-size  serving  platter  fragment  was 
uncovered  during  test  trench  excavations  in  1984 
and  retrieved  from  test  trench  #2  level  9D  which 
was  later  incorporated  into  Operation  B 
excavations  of  the  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse 
unit  #45.  The  manufacturer's  mark  is  transfer 
printed  in  a  light  reddish  brown  color  displaying 
a  globe  with  an  unidentifiable  word  printed  in 
the  middle  and  the  name  of  the  pottery  printed 
above  (Figure  6-26).  This  particular  mark  was 
used  by  the  Dresden  works  which  belonged  to 
the  Potter's  Co-operative  Company  of  East 
Liverpool,  Ohio.  The  pottery  has  been  in 
existence  since  1876  when  it  was  established  by 
Messrs.  Burnt,  Bloor,  Martin  &  Co.  (Barber  1904: 
111).  The  primary  products  produced  by  the 
Dresden  works  were  white  granite,  decorated 
table  and  toilet  wares,  and  vitreous  and  hotel 
china  (Barber  1904:  111).  At  this  point  with  the 
paucity  of  information  available  on  this 
particular  mark,  we  are  unable  to  say  any  more 
other  than  that  the  vessel  was  manufactured 
sometime  after  the  founding  of  the  pottery  in 
1876. 


IRIS  PATTERN  MARK  TRENCH  #4  LEVEL  3 

Preliminary  testing  uncovered  in  trench  #4 
level  3  the  fragments  of  a  small  plate  on  the  base 
of  which  is  visible  a  partial  pattern  mark.  The 
light  olive  green  transfer  printed  mark  is  slightly 
off-center  of  the  base  and  near  the  footring.The 
name  of  the  pattern,  "IRIS,"  is  complete  and  is 
surrounded  by  a  floral  wreath.  Underneath  the 
pattern  name  are  printed  letters  of  which, 
unfortunately,  only  the  tops  are  visible,  thus, 
providing  no  more  information  regarding  the 
origin  of  the  pattern.  The  interior  of  the 
remaining  vessel  is  undecorated  indicating  that 
the  decoration  was  around  the  rim  of  the  plate. 
Because  the  pattern  could  not  be  positively 
identified,  a  date  of  manufacture  is  at  this  point 
uncertain. 


Summary     and     Discussion     of     Maker's 
Marks 

Dating 

A  mean  date  of  manufacture  was  calculated 
for  the  identifiable  maker's  marks  by  averaging 
the  dates  assigned  for  the  production  of  the 
particular  mark.  For  those  symbols  where  a  date 
range  was  given,  an  average  was  taken  to 
determine  the  mean  date  of  production.  This 
date  was  then  incorporated  into  the  calculations 


for  the  overall  mean  manufacture  date  for  the 
marks  identified  from  the  backlots  of  units  #45 
and  #48.  The  results  of  these  calculations 
conclude  that  for  Operation  A  backmarks  the 
mean  manufacture  date  for  the  ceramic  vessels 
manufactured  in  England  is  1868.5,  for  domestic 
manufactured  wares  1885.5,  and  for  all  of  the 
marks  recovered  from  Operation  A,  1877.  For 
Operation  B  the  mean  manufacture  date  of 
English  made  wares  is  1872,  while  the  domestic 
produced  wares  is  1893,  and  the  overall  mean  for 
Operation  B  marks  is  1889.7. 

The  discrepancy  between  the  mean 
manufacture  dates  for  the  English  made 
ceramics  and  the  American  produced  wares  can 
best  be  attributed  to  the  development  of  the 
American  ceramic  industry  during  the  19th 
century.  From  the  late  1700s  until  approximately 
1880,  the  world  ceramic  market  was  dominated 
by  the  British  (Majewski  and  O'Brien  1987:  114; 
Miller  1980:  1-2).  Beginning  around  1850  until 
about  1880,  British  potters  began  to  increase 
their  production  of  "classic  ironstone"  for  export 
to  the  American  market  (Majewski  and  O'Brien 
1987:  114).  It  was  during  this  time  period  that 
English  firms,  particularly  the  Staffordshire 
potteries,  began  to  feel  pressures  from  French 
ceramic  manufacturers  who  began  exporting 
large  quantities  of  inexpensive  hard,  white 
porcelain  to  Canada  and  the  United  States 
(Wetherbee  1985:  15).  As  a  result,  the  British 
ceramic  industry  began  producing  imitations  of 
the  French  grey-white  ware  and  once  again 
assured  its  control  of  the  American  market 
which  eagerly  seized  upon  the  white 
earthenwares  that  were  characterized  as  being 
sharply,  detailed  potted  vessels,  and  displaying 
gleaming  glazes  (Wetherbee  1985:  15).  After 
about  1880,  there  was  a  shift  in  English  ceramic 
production  from  the  "classic  ironstone"  (heavy, 
semivitreous  ceramics  that  were  frequently 
either  decorated  with  relief  molding,  or  left 
plain)  to  a  lighter  weight  ironstone  ware 
(Majewski  and  O'Brien  1987:  114).  These  lighter 
wares,  however,  were  never  completely  accepted 
as  a  table  service  by  the  British,  and  thus,  the 
heavy  vitreous  and  semivitreous  wares 
continued  to  be  produced  long  after  the  decline 
of  the  "classic  ironstone"  ware  and  were 
manufactured  for  both  export  and  use  in 
England  (Wetherbee  1985:  179;  Majewski  and 
O'Brien  1987: 114). 

It  was  not,  however,  until  after  the  Civil  War 
that  American  pottery  manufacturers  began 
seriously  to  compete  with  the  British  ceramic 
industry.  Only  at  the  end  of  the  19th  century  do 
American  potters  begin  to  establish  themselves 
as  a   viable  competitor  in   the  eyes  of  the 


118    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


American  consumer  (Majewski  and   O'Brien 
1987: 115). 

In  the  1860s,  small  amounts  of  semivitreous 
ware  was  being  produced  in  New  Jersey.  This 
trend  steadily  increased  until  the  1890s  by  which 
time  American  ceramic  manufacturers  had  a 
sizable  command  of  the  U.S.  market  (Majewski 
and  O'Brien  1987:  115).  This  sudden  and  rapid 
growth  in  the  production  of  semivitreous  ware  in 
America  was  seen  as  a  result,  or  outgrowth  of, 
the  "white  granite"  industry  that  developed  in 
the  East  Liverpool  pottery  district  of  Ohio  around 
1890  (Majewski  and  O'Brien  1987:  115).  The 
American  produced  "white  granite"  was  a 
nonvitreous  to  semivitreous  ware  that  was  an 
answer  to  the  British  production  of  "classic 
ironstone,"  and  like  the  "classic  ironstone,"  was 
a  heavy,  semivitreous  ware  decorated  with  relief 
molding,  or  left  plain.  This  ware  was  the 
predominant  type  of  dinnerware  used  in  the 
average  American  home  until  the  1940s 
(Newcomb  1947:  223;  Majewski  and  O'Brien 
1987: 115). 


OPERATION  A 

Backmarks  excavated  during  Operation  A 
from  the  backlot  of  unit  #48  produced  a  mean 
manufacture  date  for  European  made  ceramics 
of  1868.5.  The  mean  date  for  the  marks  on 
domestic  wares  of  Operation  A,  as  was 
mentioned  earlier,  is  1885.5.  The  differences 
between  these  two  dates  should  be  viewed  as  a 
result  of  the  types  of  wares  available  at  the  time 
of  purchase.  These  dates  are  entirely  consistent, 
with  the  exception  of  the  Sampson,  Bridgewood 
&  Son  (Ltd)  vessel  that  was  produced  between 
1885  and  1891,  with  the  development  of  the 
American  pottery  industry  in  the  1880s  and  1890s 
and  likewise,  with  the  decline  of  British  influence 
in  the  American  ceramic  market.  The 
manufacturer's  marks  that  were  recovered  from 
the  backlot  of  unit  #48  suggest  that  prior  to  the 
1880s  the  residents  of  the  tenement  purchased 
English  refined  earthenwares  for  use  as 
tableware.  After  the  American  ceramic  industry 
had  established  itself  as  a  serious  competitor  in 
the  ceramic  market  in  the  1880s,  residents  then 
opted  for  the  purchase  of  domestic 
manufactured  wares. 

The  presence  of  the  Sampson,  Bridgewood 
&Son  (Ltd)  vessel,  which  was  identified  as  a 
small  bowl,  with  a  relatively  late  date  of 
manufacture,  indicates  that  the  occupants  of  the 
tenement  continued  to  purchase  limited 
amounts  of  English  manufactured  ceramics, 
possibly  for  special  function  items  such  as  tea 
ware  or  display  pieces. 


The  general  shift  that  is  evident  in  the 
Operation  A  data  suggests  an  effort  of 
economizing,  as  far  as  the  purchase  of  everyday 
tableware  was  concerned,  as  ceramics 
manufactured  in  the  United  States  would  have 
been  considerably  less  expensive,  because  of 
the  decrease  in  the  costs  of  shipping  and 
handling,  as  well  as  being  more  readily  available. 

The  mean  date  of  production  for  all  of  the 
maker's  marks  recovered  during  Operation  A 
excavations  is  1877.  This  date  represents  the 
mean  of  the  earliest  possible  dates  of 
manufacture  for  the  marks  under  study.  As  1877 
falls  right  after  the  beginning  of  the  assertion  of 
influence  by  the  American  ceramic  industry,  the 
data  is  then  consistent  as  the  appearance  of  an 
equal  number  of  European  and  domestic 
manufactured  ceramics  indicates.  What  we  are 
seeing  represented  is  a  period  of  transition 
where  there  is  a  shift  being  made  towards  the 
purchase  of  American  wares,  but  at  the  same 
time,  remaining  somewhat  loyal  to  the  ever 
present  British  ceramic  industries,  particularly 
for  certain  vessels  of  certain  forms  and 
functions. 


OPERATION  B 

Operation  B  yielded  13  identifiable 
manufacturer's  marks.  Of  these  13  marks,  two 
were  from  European  potteries  while  the 
remaining  11  were  produced  by  firms  in  the 
United  States.  The  mean  date  of  manufacture 
for  the  European  made  wares  is  1872.  Both  of 
the  vessels  represented  in  Operation  B  were 
manufactured  at  the  Staffordshire  potteries  in 
England  and  once  again,  as  in  Operation  A, 
represent  ceramic  purchases  made  at  the  end  of 
the  period  of  British  domination  in  the  ceramic 
market. 

The  11  domestic  marks  retrieved  from  the 
backlot  of  unit  #45  have  a  calculated  mean 
manufacture  date  of  1893.  The  large  sample  size 
and  the  late  mean  production  date  indicate  that 
the  bulk  of  the  purchases  for  ceramic  vessels 
were  made  after  the  1880s;  well  into  the  time 
period  when  American  potteries  began  to 
dominate  the  ceramic  market  in  the  United 
States.  The  preponderance  of  domestic 
manufactured  wares  points  to  efforts  of 
economizing  at  the  boardinghouse  through  the 
purchase  of  ceramic  items.  The  American  wares 
had  increased  availability,  and  thus,  would  have 
been  much  easier  to  replace  with  like  or  similar 
vessels,  as  well  as  being  cheaper,  because  of  the 
reduction  in  transportation  costs. 

The  mean  date  of  manufacture  for  all  of  the 
identifiable    backmarks    recovered     during 


Ceramic  Analysis    119 


Operation  B  excavations  is  1889.7.  Unlike 
Operation  A,  the  Operation  B  mean 
manufacture  date  points  to  a  period  of  purchase 
for  ceramic  vessels  that  is  well  into  the  period 
when  American  potters  began  to  control  the 
ceramic  market.  The  two  marks  that  were  of 
European  manufacture  are  more  than  likely 
from  vessels  that  had  an  extended  use  life  or 
were  possibly  curated  as  pieces  that  were  given  a 
special  function  or  status.  Archeologically,  the 
marks  indicate  that  excavations  of  the  backlot  of 
unit  #45  were  focusing  on  boardinghouse  life 
from  the  last  two  decades  of  the  19th  century  on 
into  the  first  decade  of  the  20th  century.  During 
this  period  it  is  clear  that  domestically 
manufactured  ceramics  were  preferred  over 
European  wares,  once  again,  most  likely  in  an 
effort  to  reduce  operating  costs  of  the 
boardinghouse  as  American  wares  would  have 
exhibited  a  reduced  price  in  addition  to  an 
increased  availability. 


Conclusions 

The  conclusions  drawn  from  the  results  of  the 
hypotheses  generated  for  testing  the  variables 
quantity,  quality,  and  variety  demonstrate  that  in 
the  mill  community,  level  of  class  membership 
and  family  composition  only  affect  the  quantity 
of  ceramics  per  individual  purchased  by  a 
household.  The  variables  quality  and  variety 
when  tested,  produced  insignificant  results. 
Perhaps  the  small  number  of  observed 
differences  in  the  tests  conducted  for  the 
variable  variety  are  a  result  of  the  more  equal 
access  to  food  items  in  an  urban  setting  for  all 
classes.  Likewise,  the  introduction  of  mass 
produced  ceramic  tableware  in  the  late  19th 
century  made  a  wide  range  of  ceramic  types  and 
forms  accessible  to  all  socioeconomic  classes. 

In  both  assemblages  there  appeared  to  be  no 
successful  attempt  to  purchase  ceramics  in  sets. 
Advertisements  from  19th-century  newspapers 
illustrate  that  businesses  in  Lowell  were  aware  of 
the  financial  constraints  placed  upon 
boardinghouse  keepers  and  were  willing  to 
accommodate  them  in  their  efforts  to 
economize.  The  data  similarly  suggest  that  the 
tenement  residents  were  faced  with  the  same 
welter  of  financial  constraints  and  responded  to 
the  need  for  economizing  in  much  the  same 
manner  as  the  boardinghouse  keepers. 

The  presence  of  more  expensive  tea-  and 
coffeeware  in  the  tenement  assemblage 
indicates  that  these  vessel  forms  served  in  a 
more  status  related  function  than  the  tea-  and 
coffeeware  from  the  boardinghouse.  Tenement 
residents    were    often    skilled    workers    or 


immigrants  and,  as  a  result  of  their  housing 
situation,  were  afforded  more  opportunity  for 
self  expression  through  their  ceramic  purchases. 
Immigrants,  responding  to  the  call  for  cheap 
labor,  frequently  entered  American  society  at 
the  bottom  of  the  social  hierarchy.  Therefore,  in 
an  effort  to  escape  the  social  stigma  and 
economic  consequences  of  lower  class  life, 
immigrants  frequently  assimilated.  The 
retention  of  ethnic  traditions  often  resulted  in 
the  preservation  of  class  differences  associated 
with  immigrant  status  (Steinberg  1981).  The 
purchase  and  display  of  expensive  tea-  and 
coffeeware  was  one  attempt  made  by  the 
tenement  residents  to  assimilate  and  to  display 
middle  class  values. 

Aside  from  tea-  and  coffeeware,  the  two 
ceramic  assemblages  were  remarkably  similar. 
Undecorated  whitewares  dominated  both 
collections  with  smaller  percentages  of  transfer 
printed  and  handpainted  ware.  The  increased 
availability  of  ceramic  tableware  types  and 
forms  in  the  late  19th  century  lessens  the 
number  of  observed  differences  between 
ceramic  assemblages  of  households  with  similar 
financial  means. 

Analysis  of  the  manufacturer's  marks 
demonstrates  that  both  the  tenement  and 
boardinghouse  residents  opted  for  the  purchase 
of  domestically  produced  ceramics  after  the 
American  ceramic  industry  had  established 
itself  as  a  serious  competitor  in  the  world 
ceramic  market  in  the  1880s.  By  acquiring 
domestic  ceramic  wares,  residents  of  both  the 
tenement  and  boardinghouse  tried  to 
economize,  as  these  wares  would  have  been  less 
expensive  because  of  reduced  transportation 
costs  and  increased  availability. 

The  majority  of  the  American  manufactured 
wares  purchased  by  the  boardinghouse  and 
tenement  residents  were  from  the  East 
Liverpool,  Ohio,  pottery  district  with  lesser 
quantities  coming  from  West  Virginia,  New 
Jersey,  and  England.  The  East  Liverpool 
potteries  dominated  the  American  ceramic 
market  after  the  1880s,  and  the  preponderance 
of  wares  from  this  region  is  not  surprising. 

The  ceramic  assemblages  recovered  from  the 
boardinghouse  and  tenement  backlots  at  Lowell 
reflect  two  late  19th  century  working  class 
households  operating  under  different  household 
structures  but  within  similar  economic 
constraints.  Ceramic  purchasing  patterns  reflect 
attempts  at  economizing  for  both  assemblages 
in  addition  to  providing  the  necessary  forms  for 
food  service  and  consumption.  The  tenement 
residents  sought  to  emulate  middle-class  dining 
habits  by  including  more  vessels  in  a  table 


120    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 

setting  per  person  even  though  these  were 
unspecialized  in  function.  This  suggests  that  for 
the  tenement,  vessel  function  was  more  fluid 
with  particular  forms  serving  in  various 
capacities  other  than  their  intended  use.  The 
boardinghouse,  on  the  other  hand,  provided  only 
the  basics  for  food  service  and  consumption. 
Complete  meals  were  served  to  individuals  on  a 
single  plate  with  little  or  no  accessories  such  as 
vegetable  dishes,  bread  plates,  and  salad  plates. 
In  this  way  the  tenement  household  attempted 
to  follow  main  stream  middle-class  dining  rituals 
by  adapting  their  limited  ceramic  assemblage  to 
reproduce  as  close  as  possible  a  middle-class 
table  service  while  the  boardinghouse,  only 
concerned  with  the  service  of  food,  neglected 
such  refinements  in  vessel  function. 

Life  for  the  mill  labor  force  was  one 
characterized  by  limited  financial  resources. 
Even  though  options  available  in  corporate 
housing  offered  some  residents  more 
purchasing  freedom,  it  appears  that  similar 
economic  restraints  acted  as  a  more  powerful 
determinant,  cutting  across  class  rank,  in  the 
purchase  of  ceramic  wares.  Household  make- 
up (nuclear  family  vs.  corporate  boardinghouse), 
however,  altered  the  views  of  vessel  function 
within  the  tenement  and  boardinghouse 
ceramic  assemblages.  The  use  of  tea-  and 
coffeewares  as  status  display  items  by  the 
tenement  residents,  an  option  not  available  to 
the  boardinghouse  occupants,  and  the  use  of 
single  vessels  in  several  functional  capacities  are 
differences  that  separate  the  lifestyles  of 
individuals  and  families  living  in  corporate 
housing  at  the  Boott  Mills  in  Lowell. 


Chapter  7 

THE  MEDICINE,  ALCOHOL,  AND  SODA  VESSELS  FROM  THE 
BOOTT  MILLS  BOARDINGHOUSES 

by  Kathleen  H.  Bond 


Introduction 

A  portion  of  the  vessel  glass — medicine, 
alcohol,  and  soda  bottles  and  jars — recovered 
from  the  Boott  boardinghouse  backlots  is 
discussed  below.  These  three  categories  of  glass 
were  separated  from  other  types  of  container 
glass  (e.g.,  food,  milk,  and  condiment  bottles  and 
jars)  and  analyzed  as  a  discrete  unit.  The 
decision  to  divide  the  glass  vessels  arose  from 
the  sheer  quantity  of  glass  artifacts  (over  14,000 
fragments  of  vessel  glass  were  present).  The 
medicine,  alcohol,  and  soda  glass  were  grouped 
together,  as  they  are  products  often  associated 
with  leisure  behavior,  whereas  food  and  milk 
containers  are  generally  purchased  in 
conjunction  with  food  preparation  and 
consumption  activities.  The  split  in  the  analysis 
is,  however,  somewhat  arbitrary,  as  some  of  the 
vessels  associated  with  leisure  behavior  were  no 
doubt  used  at  mealtime  and  vice  versa. 

The  medicine,  alcohol,  and  soda  vessels 
recovered  from  the  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse 
site  were  analyzed  within  the  framework 
delineated  in  the  project's  research  design.  One 
of  the  research  objectives  posed  in  the  design 
was  to  delineate  patterns  of  consumer  behavior 
among  the  residents  of  the  housing.  This  focus 
was  guided,  however,  by  the  knowledge  that  life 
in  the  residences  reflected  a  "corporate  pattern 
of  consumption  and  lifestyle"  (Beaudry  and 
Mrozowski  1987:  6).  That  is,  consumer  choices 
were  made  not  only  on  the  basis  of  personal 
choice  and  cost  of  goods,  but  they  were  also 
influenced  by  a  corporate  policy  that  touched 
virtually  all  aspects  of  an  individual's  life.  One  of 
the  ways  that  the  policy  affected  workers' 
behavior  was  that  these  individuals  had  little,  if 
any,  say  in  the  acquisition  of  most  items  used  on 
a  daily  basis;  the  household  wares  and 
furnishings  in  the  boardinghouses  were 
purchased  by  the  keepers  of  each  unit, 
individuals  who  exercised  enormous  control  over 
the  domestic  environment.  Products  associated 
with  leisure  behavior,  such  as  drink  and  tobacco, 
as  well  as  personal  effects,  were  the  exception  to 
the  norm;  they  were  purchased  directly  by  the 
workers.  The  medicine  and  beverages  that 
workers  consumed  and  discarded  reflect,  then, 
some  of  the  more  personal  choices  made  by  the 


Boott  workers.  Even  these  choices,  however, 
were  influenced  by  the  corporate  system  of 
policies  and  regulations.  The  focus  of  the 
analysis  of  the  medicine  and  beverage  vessels 
recovered  from  the  Boott  examines  the  workers' 
choices  in  light  of  the  corporate  way  of  life. 

Within  the  discussion,  an  overview  of  the 
number,  manufacture  dates,  and  deposition  of 
the  medicine,  alcohol,  and  soda  vessels  is 
presented  first.  This  is  followed  by  a  description 
of  techniques  used  in  the  manufacture  of  19th- 
and  20th-century  bottle  glass,  particularly  those 
that  were  first  introduced  during  the  latter  part 
of  the  1800s.  Following  the  description  of 
manufacture,  the  vessel?  in  the  assemblages 
from  each  functional  category  are  discussed. 
The  artifacts  from  Operation  A  (the  tenement) 
and  B  (the  boardinghouse)  are  discussed 
separately.  An  interpretation  of  the  assemblage 
is  presented  last. 


Minimum  Number  of  Vessels 

Minimum  number  of  vessel  (MNV)  was 
calculated  using  two  approaches.  Whole  bases, 
base  fragments  that  were  at  least  50%  complete, 
and  base  fragments  that  were  unique  in  the 
assemblage  were  assigned  an  MNV  of  one.  In 
certain  instances,  however,  there  was  a  lesser 
number  of  bases  to  finishes  within  a  vessel  type. 
Finishes  that  exceeded  the  number  of  bases  in  a 
particular  type  and  unique  finishes  were  also 
assigned  an  MNV  of  one.  In  a  few  cases,  body 
fragments  did  not  correspond  in  color  or 
manufacturing  technique  to  any  base  or  finish  in 
the  assemblage  and  were  also  included  in  the 
vessel  count. 

A  total  of  14,271  glass  vessel  fragments  were 
recovered  from  the  two  operations:  5426 
fragments  came  from  Operation  A  and  8845 
from  Operation  B.  Of  the  169  total  vessels,  84 
were  medicinal,  72  were  alcohol,  and  13  were 
soda.  Sixty  vessels  came  from  the  tenement  and 
almost  twice  as  many,  109,  from  the 
boardinghouse.  Table  7-1  and  Table  7-2  break 
the  MNV  up  according  to  the  two  operations. 
Two  of  the  functional  categories  were  further 
subdivided;  alcoholic  beverages  were  separated 


121 


122   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


into  liquor,  beer,  and  wine  vessels,  and  medicine 
into  proprietary  and  toiletry  vessels. 


Table  7-1.  Minimum  Vessel  Count,  Operation  A. 

Type 
Medicinal 

#                            % 

Proprietary 
Toiletry 

29                       48.3 
1                         1.7 

Subtotal 

30                       50.0 

Alcohol 

Liquor 
Wine 

18                       30.0 
2                         3.3 

Beer 

4                         6.6 

Subtotal 

24                       39.9 

Soda 

6                       10.0 

Totals 

60                     100.0 

between  the  tenement  bulkhead  and  the 
woodshed. 

Twenty-seven  vessels  (25%)  were  recovered 
from  features  in  Operation  B.  Of  the  features 
sampled  or  excavated,  the  privy  (Feature  61)  and 
the  well  (Feature  2)  contained  the  largest 
deposits.  Feature  65,  a  pit  or  planting  hole,  also 
yielded  a  fair  number  of  glass  fragments. 

Eighty-two  vessels  (75%)  were  recovered  from 
yard  scatter  in  the  boardinghouse  backlot. 
Although  glass  littered  the  backyard,  the 
heaviest  concentrations  were  in  two  areas: 
between  the  back  wall  of  the  boardinghouse  and 
the  unexcavated  area  near  the  modern-day 
lamp  post;  and  between  the  ell  of  unit  #45  and 
the  woodshed. 


Deposition  of  Medicinal,  Alcohol,  and  Soda 
Vessels 

Of  the  vessels  recovered,  31  (52%)  were  from 
features  in  Operation  A.  Four  features 
contained  the  greatest  quantity  of  glass, 
including  the  privy  (Feature  45),  the  well 
(Feature  43),  and  the  tenement  bulkhead 
(Feature  23).  The  fourth  feature,  Feature  46,  a 
shallow  pit  along  the  inside  edge  of  the 
woodshed  foundation,  near  the  privy,  was 
designated  a  bottle  dump  or  cache  because  it 
contained  almost  nothing  but  liquor  and 
medicine  bottle  glass.  A  minimum  of  5  mold- 
made  liquor  and  medicine  bottles  had  been 
broken  into  many  fragments,  but  at  least  4  had 
been  deposited  unbroken,  as  they  still  lay  in 
their  original  shapes  (Figure  7-1). 


Table  7-2.  Minimum  Vessel  Count, 

Operation  B. 

Type 
Medicinal 

# 

% 

Proprietary 

Toiletry 

Subtotal 

49 

5 

54 

45.0 

4.5 

49.5 

Alcohol 

Liquor 
Wine 

36 

7 

32.7 
6.4 

Beer 

5 

4.5 

Subtotal 

48 

43.6 

Soda 

7 

6.4 

Totals 

109 

100.0 

Twenty-nine  (48%)  of  the  vessels  from  the 
tenement  came  from  yard  scatter.  The  most 
concentrated  areas  of  scatter  were  within  the 
limits  of  the  tenement  ell  and  in  an  area  running 


Dating  of  Assemblage 

Of  the  165  datable  vessels  in  the  MNV  for 
both  operations,  8  (5%)  were  mold-  or  free-blown 
prior  to  1880.  One-hundred-six  (64%)  were  mold- 
blown  between  1880  and  1920,  and  41  (24%)  were 
machine-made  after  1904.  Another  14  (9%)  could 
be  dated  no  more  closely  than  to  after  1860. 
These  four  broad  time  periods  have  been  used 
only  as  "ballpark"  dates,  and  are  based  on  major 
developments  in  19th-  and  20th  century  bottle 
manufacture;  within  each  period,  some  of  the 
glass  could  be  more  tightly  dated. 


Manufacture 
Bottle  Glass 


of    19th-    and    20th-century 


The  medicinal,  alcohol,  and  soda  vessels  were 
first  examined  for  evidence  of  mold  or  machine 
manufacture.  If  a  vessel  was  mold-blown,  it  was 
studied  for  evidence  of  empontilling  or  use  of  a 
snap  case.  It  was  also  examined  for  evidence  of 
use  of  a  finishing  tool.  For  descriptions  of  the 
various  molds  and  the  processes  involved  with 
snap  cases  and  finishing  tools,  refer  to  Jones  and 
Sullivan  1985  as  well  as  Toulouse  1969a  and 
1969b. 

As  the  majority  of  glass  dated  after  1880,  the 
following  six  manufacturing  techniques  were 
common  in  the  assemblage.  The  techniques  are 
described  below  in  chronological  order. 


Plate  Molds 

Bottles  had  been  embossed  since  the  18th 
century  (Noel  Hume  1969:  74),  but  plate  molds 
were  used  by  the  1860s.  The  plates  were  inserted 
into  the  mold,  which  "enabled  the  glassmaker  to 
blow  personalized  bottles  for  a  buyer  whose 
needs  were  too  small  to  justify  the  expense  of  a 


Medicine,  Alcohol,  and  Soda  Vessels    123 


*K  A. 


Figure  7-1.    Feature  46,  a  bottle  dump  just  outside  the  tenement  privy.   Camera  faces 
cast.  (Photograph  by  Paul  Giblin.) 


124   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


complete  mold"  (Toulouse  1969b:  584).  One 
body  mold  could  then  serve  many  customers. 
After  about  1890,  the  terms  "Warranted," 
"Registered,"  and  "Guaranteed"  were  often 
embossed  on  liquor  bottles  to  assure  the 
customer  that  he  or  she  was  getting  a  true 
measure;  these  terms  remained  in  use  until 
Prohibition  (Peterson  1968:  45;  Bernard 
Puckhaber,  personal  communication,  1987). 


converted  to  either  semi-automatic  or  automatic 
machinery  (Miller  and  Sullivan  1984:  89).  Unless 
otherwise  noted,  1920  has  been  designated  a  cut- 
off date  for  the  mold-made  vessels  in  the 
assemblage.  Seams  on  machine-made 
containers  generally  run  from  the  heel  to  the  top 
of  the  lip,  horizontally  around  the  finish.  A 
feathery  scar  on  the  base,  known  as  an  Owen's 
suction  scar,  can  be  found  on  some  machine- 
made  containers. 


Turn  Mold 

From  1880  to  about  1910,  many  wine  bottles,  as 
well  as  some  other  types  of  bottles,  were  turn 
molded.  This  technique  erased  the  mold  seams 
but  left  horizontal  markings  on  the  bottle 
(Toulouse  1969a:  532). 


Vent  Mold 

A  process  used  only  on  mold-made  bottles, 
small  holes  were  drilled  into  the  shoulders  or 
base  of  the  bottle.  This  permitted  pressure  to  be 
released  and  ensured  a  more  perfect  form 
(Jones  and  Sullivan  1985:  47).  While  the 
technique  dates  from  about  1875,  it  was  not  used 
on  whiskey  bottles  until  1892  (Cheney  1982:  n.p.). 


Decolorized    Glass 

After  1880,  by  which  date  manufacturers 
perfected  the  technique  of  decolorizing  glass 
with  manganese,  colorless  glass  was  widely  used 
in  packaging  (Munsey  1970:  55).  Prior  to  that 
time,  colorless  glass  had  been  used,  but,  more 
often,  American  bottles  were  made  of  natural 
colors  such  as  aqua,  green,  or  amber  (McKearin 
and  McKearin  1941:  7,  cited  in  Baugher-Perlin 
1982: 261). 


Crown  Cap 

The  crown  cap,  the  common  closure  for  beer 
and  soda  bottles,  still  in  use  today,  was  invented 
in  1892  (Lief  1965: 17). 


Machine    Manufacture 

A  limited  amount  of  semi-automatic 
production  of  glass  containers  was  achieved  by 
1900,  but  fully  automatic  manufacturing  dates 
from  1904  for  wide-mouth  containers  and  1908- 
1910  for  narrow-mouth  bottles  (Miller  and 
Sullivan  1984:  85;  John  Cheney,  personal 
communication,  1988).  It  was  only  by  1920, 
however,  that  90%  of  the  glass  houses  had 


Vessels  Discussed  By  Functional  Type 

The  assemblage  is  subdivided  according  to 
operation.  Within  each  subdivision,  an  overview 
of  the  numbers  of  vessels,  their  colors,  and 
manufacture  dates  is  provided.  Embossed 
vessels,  whole  vessels,  and  those  of  relatively 
early  manufacture  are  discussed  in  more  detail. 
If  a  vessel's  provenience  is  not  identified,  it  can 
be  assumed  that  it  is  yard  scatter.  When 
complete  bottles  or  bases  are  described, 
measurements  in  centimeters  are  provided. 


Medicinal   (Proprietary) 

Operation  A 

Twenty-nine  proprietary  medicine  vessels 
were  recovered  from  the  tenement.  There  were 
bases  and  finishes  to  25  separate  vessels.  Body 
fragments  to  three  vessels  and  one  whole  bottle 
were  also  recovered.  One  vessel  was  restorable. 
Nineteen  of  the  vessels  were  colorless,  five  were 
aqua  or  light  green.,  and  the  rest  were  cobalt 
blue,  or  amber.  Of  the  datable  vessels,  16  were 
mold-made  and  11  were  machine-made. 

There  were  15  colorless  or  aqua  rectangular 
bases  to  bottles  formed  in  two-part  molds,  with 
separate  base  parts.  Many  had  chamfered 
edges  and  recessed  panels.  All  of  the  bottles 
were  manufactured  after  1860,  with  most  of  the 
colorless  bottles  made  after  1880.  The  bases 
measured  2.5  cm  on  the  short  side  and  from  4 
cm-5  cm  on  the  long  side.  One  bottle,  recovered 
from  Feature  46,  the  bottle  dump,  had  been 
manufactured  by  Campbell  Glass  Works  in 
Berkeley,  California.  The  heel  was  embossed  "C. 
G.  W.,"  a  mark  used  by  the  firm  between  1884 
and  1885  (Toulouse  1972: 129).  Another  colorless 
rectangular  base,  measuring  2  cm  x  3  cm,  was 

embossed  "NEID ER  MONTAUK."    One 

base  and  partial  body  to  a  vent-molded  bottle 
from  the  bulkhead  (Feature  23,  level  D),  had 
contained  a  remedy  sold  by  Dr.  John 
Chmielnicki,  Chemist,  of  Somerville, 
Massachusetts  (Figures  7-2,  7-4r).  He  was  listed 
in  that  town's  Directory  between  1912  and  1915. 


Medicine,  Alcohol,  and  Soda  Vessels    125 


Figure  7-2.    Rectangular  medicine  bottle  embossed  Dr.  Chmiclnicki  &  Co.,  Chemists 
Somcrville,  Massachusetts.   (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  7-3.      Embossed   wording  on   the  side  of  W.   F.   Scvcra   medicine  bottle. 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


126   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  7-4.  Two  rectangular  medicine  bottles.   Left,  W.  F.  Scvera  medicine.   Right,  Dr. 
Chmielnicki  &  Co.,  Chemists.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  7-5  Five  empontilled  medicine  bases.  Top  left,  octagonally-shaped  vial,  two-part 
mold.  Top  center,  bottle,  dip  molded  (ribbed  design  is  not  visible).  Top  right,  vial,  dip 
molded  (ribbed  design  not  visible).  Bottom  left,  vial,  dip  molded  or  free  blown.  Bottom 
right,  Moses  Atwood's  Jaundice  Bitters  bottle,  dip  molded.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S 
Kanaski.)  6    K      7 


Medicine,  Alcohol,  and  Soda  Vessels    127 


Two  light  green  bases  were  empontilled  and 
date  no  later  than  1870  (Figures  7-5  top  left,  7-5 
top  center).  The  first  base,  from  an  octagonally- 
shaped  medicine  or  toiletry  vial  formed  in  a  two- 
part  mold,  was  2  cm  wide.  The  second  base, 
from  a  light  green  dip-molded  cylindrical  bottle 
that  contained  either  medicine  or  a  household 
product,  measured  5.5  cm.  There  appears  to  be 
a  vertical  rib-like  design  on  the  body.  The  base 
was  recovered  from  the  privy  (Feature  45/A)  and 
crossmends  with  a  fragment  recovered  near  the 
boardinghouse  well.  One  colorless  round  base,  7 
cm  in  diameter,  was  from  a  druggist's  graduated 
cylinder;  such  items  were  advertised  by  1880  in 
Whitall  Tatum  &  Co.  druggist's  glassware 
catalog  (1880:  64-65). 

There  were  light  blue  embossed  body 
fragments  that  read  "MASS  USA."  Bottles  that 
contained  medicines  sold  by  the  J.  C.  Ayer  Drug 
Company  of  Lowell  were  similarly  embossed 
(Wilson  1981:  430).  Amber  body  fragments  in 
Feature  44  (a  dark  soil  stain  by  a  brick  drain  box) 
were  from  a  bottle  that  had  contained  a  product 
sold  by  Carleton  &  Hovey,  Lowell  druggists. 
Both  firms  were  established  in  the  1840s  and 
continued  in  business  well  into  the  1900s.  Two 
amber-green  body  fragments  were  embossed 
with  part  of  a  log  cabin  and  tree,  typical  motifs 
for  bitters-type  medicines.  Bitters  were 
manufactured  most  widely  between  1860  and 
1920  (Munsey  1970: 112). 

The  cellar  (Feature  25/D)  yielded  one  round 
cobalt  blue  base  that  measured  2.5.  cm,  with  a 
maker's  mark  of  two  dots  inside  a  square.  It 
mended  to  body  fragments  (found  in  level  E)  on 
which  part  of  the  wording  "BROMO  SELTZER 
EMERSON  DRUG  CO.  BALTIMORE"  could  be 
read.  The  bottle  dates  from  1889,  when  the 
medicine  was  first  made,  to  1915  (Toulouse  1971: 
339). 

One  whole  proprietary  medicine  bottle  was 
recovered  from  the  cellar  fill  (Feature  25/D).  It 
had  contained  W.  F.  Severa's  Stomach  Bitters, 
manufactured  in  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa.  (Figures 
7-3,  7-4  left).  The  bottle  was  machine-made 
between  1916  and  1929  and  measured  2.5  cm  x  4 
cm  x  13  cm.  As  of  1909  the  medicine  contained 
25%  alcohol,  and  the  remedy  was  advertised  as 
"a  valuable  laxative,  tonic,  invigorant,  and 
recuperant"  (Fike  1987:  180).  It  was  particularly 
recommended  for  "old  and  delicate  people."  A 
bottle  known  as  a  French  Square  (Whitall  Tatum 
1880:  13)  that  measured  6  cm  x  16  cm  could  be 
partially  restored  (Figure  7-6).  Although  first  on 
the  market  in  the  1860s  (Lorrain  1968:  44),  the 
smoothly  made  finish  would  suggest  a  somewhat 
later  manufacture  date.  It  was  recovered  from 
Feature  46,  the  bottle  dump. 


Figure  7-6:  French  Square  medicine  bottle. 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


128   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  7-7  Two  toiletry  and  ointment  jars.  Left,  milk  glass  screw-top  toiletry  or 
medicine  jar.  Right,  screw-top  Vaseline  ointment  jar.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.) 


Figure  7-8  Three  medicine  bottles.  Left,  light  green  Kemp's  Balsam.  Center, 
unembossed  bottle,  with  inset  front.  Right,  unembossed  vial.  (Photograph  by  Richard 
S.  Kanaski.) 


Medicine,  Alcohol,  and  Soda  Vessels    129 


Figure  7-9.  Three  pint  liquor  flasks.  Left,  flask  embossed  "One  Pint."  Center,  flask 
embossed  "Guaranteed  Full  Pint."  Right,  H.  Swartz  &  Co.  flask.  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


230   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


In  addition  to  the  medicinal  bottles  and 
jars,the  tenement  backlot  yielded  one  yellow 
glass  medicine  dropper. 


Jo..   LBBLA1TC, 

W.  I.  Goods,  Groceries,  Flour,  Provisions  and  Produce. 

ALSO  DEALER  IN  WOOD  A1»D  COAL. 
W  to  71  P»rtd—n  ltrM(,  for.  WtUl  ItrMt.      -      -      -       Lo<r«ll.   Mb.. 


Boston  Branch  Grocery  and  Tea  Store. 

iclqli  aid  ma  km  £  fin  out mods,  flock,  um  mi  in 

.'Al.KD    I..    SMITH,    !•,„,.,!.,„,. 

465  Middlesex  Street,  opp.  Northern  Depot,  L-woll. 


PATRICK  TEAGUE, 


FAMILV  TRADE  A  SPECIALTY. 

,  S2S  MERRIMACK  STREET,  LOWELL 


S  PETER  ^(ATSOII  5  SOU, 

JBHKERS. 

RETAIL  GROCERS. 

;  A  fall  line  of  Fanrjt  Cracker*  ana" 
Cakm  of  all  Mada. 

94  to  60  Claries  St.  and  487  Lawrence  Si. 


JAMES  CALN1N, 

BHUWUR'*     AOHJIfT 

Carbonated  Beverages 

BUTTLED  ALE  AMI  I'UHTKK. 
Al.su  BEST  (ill  IDES  LAtiEB. 

101  to  107  Lake  View  Av  .  Lowell 


L.  P.  TURCOTTE, 

WHOLESALE  nun  RETAIL. 
J  41  to  147  Worthen  Street. 


P.  DEMPSEY  &  CO. 


LIQUORS 


Bulk  Goods,  Bottle  Goods,  Straight  Goods,  Blonded  Goods. 
Rectified  Goods,  In  Large  Variety. 

FISHER  RYE,  THE  FINEST  HIGH  BALL  WHISKEY  IN  AMERICA. 


383  MARKET  ST. 


LOWELL,  MASS. 


Figure  7-10.  Advertisements  in  1900  Lowell  City 
Directory  for  P.  Dempsey  &  Co.  and  James 
Calnin,  as  well  as  other  Lowell  liquor  dealers. 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Operation    B 

Of  the  49  total  medicine  containers,  45  were 
represented  by  bases  and  finishes  and  one  by 
body  fragments.  There  were  two  whole  vessels 
and  one  nearly  whole.  One  bottle  was  restorable. 
Thirty-three  vessels  were  colorless,  10  were  aqua 
or  light  green,  and  6  were  amber,  cobalt  blue,  or 
opaque  milk  glass.  Of  the  datable  containers,  36 
were  mold-made  and  9  were  machine-made. 
Three  of  the  49  vessels  held  either  medicines  or 
toiletries. 

Of  the  43  colorless  or  aqua  vessels,  rectangular 
bottles  predominated,  identical  in  size  and 
design  to  those  in  Operation  A.  Three  aqua 
medicine  or  toiletry  bases,  however,  bore  pontil 
scars  (Figures  7-5  top  rt,  7-5  bottom  left,  7-5 
bottom  rt).  One  round  base  was  manufactured 
in  a  dip  mold,  with  a  vertical  rib  design,  and 
measured  2  cm.  A  second  round  base  was  either 
free  blown  or  dip  molded  and  measured  1.5  cm 
in  diameter.  Both  bases  were  likely  made  by 
1870.  An  octagonal  base  was  dip  molded,  and 
embossed  body  fragments  from  the  same  bottle 
provide  evidence  that  it  contained  Moses 
Atwood's  Jaundice  Bitters,  manufactured  in 
Georgetown,  Massachusetts.  The  firm  was 
established  in  1840,  and  the  bottle  dates  to  no 
later  than  1865  (Fike  1987:  31).  It  measured  4  cm 
in  diameter.  One  heat-altered  round  base  was 
part  of  a  druggist's  graduated  cylinder. 

Finishes  from  two  small,  cylindrical  medicinal 
vials  (bore  diameter  of  approximately  2  cm),  one 
aqua  and  one  light  green,  were  manipulated 
without  the  use  of  a  finishing  tool.  The  aqua 
finish,  which  appears  to  be  from  the  same  bottle 
as  the  smallest  empontilled  base,  consisted  of  a 
folded-out  lip.  The  light  green  finish  consisted  of 
a  cracked-off  lip  and  an  untooled  string  rim.  It 
was  manufactured  no  later  than  about  1860. 

One  aqua  body  fragment,  probably  to  the 
same  bottle  as  one  of  the  aqua  bases  or  finishes, 
was  embossed  "DR.  KILMER'S."  It  contained 
one  of  18  herbal  remedies  manufactured  by 
Andral  Kilmer  (the  most  famous  of  which  was  his 
Swamp  Root),  of  Binghamton,  New  York,  from 
the  1870s  to  1925  (Fike  1987:  101).  One  embossed 
colorless  fragment  was  from  a  Moxie  Nerve 
Food  bottle,  a  concoction  first  made  in  Lowell  in 
1885  (Fike  1987: 173). 

Three  dark  amber  body  fragments  from  one 
paneled  bottle  were  embossed  "ATHE,"  "PINT," 
and  "S."  The  bottle  had  contained  Father  John's 
Medicine,  sold  by  the  Carleton  &  Hovey  drug 


Medicine,  Alcohol,  and  Soda  Vessels    131 


store  in  Lowell.  First  manufactured  in  the  1850s, 
the  remedy  was  sold  well  into  the  20th  century 
(Fike  1987:  146).  There  was  also  a  partial  base 
and  body  to  a  small  amber  screw-top  jar.  It  was  4 
cm  tall  and  contained  either  medicine  or  a 
toiletry. 

There  was  one  milk  glass  prescription  finish, 
and  one  milk  glass  base  that  was  embossed  "[W] 
T  &  CO  [PA]T  1892."  The  cylindrical  bottle,  3  cm 
wide,  was  made  by  Whitall,  Tatum  &  Co  after 
1892  and  probably  before  1912  (Toulouse  1971: 
544).  It  contained  either  medicine  or  a  toiletry. 

Of  the  two  whole  medicine  vessels  in 
Operation  B,  one  was  a  molded,  screw-top,  milk 
glass  medicine  or  toiletry  jar  (Figure  7-7,  left).  It 
was  recovered  from  the  privy  (Feature  61 /A)  and 
measured  5  cm  x  6.5  cm.  Level  B  of  the  well 
(T2/9b)  yielded  a  cylindrical  medicine  vial 
(Figure  7-8r).  It  measured  1.5  cm  x  5.5  cm,  and, 
as  there  were  no  mold  seams  or  evidence  of  turn 
molding,  the  vial  was  probably  dip  molded. 
Although  dip  molding  was  most  common  prior 
to  the  mid-19th  century,  the  vial's  smooth  finish 
suggests  a  somewhat  later  manufacture. 

A  small  milk-bottle-shaped  vial  was  nearly 
whole  (Figure  7-8  ctr),  and  a  light  green  Kemp's 
Balsam  bottle  was  restorable  (Figure  7-8,  left). 
The  vial  measured  2  cm  x  7  cm  and  was  made 
after  1880.  The  bottom  half  of  one  side  was  inset 
for  a  paper  label.  The  Kemp's  Balsam 
recovered  from  Feature  65/B,  a  pit  or  planting 
hole,  measured  1.5  cm  x  3  cm  x  7  cm.  The  bottle 
was  mold-made  in  LeRoy,  New  York,  between 
1900  and  1911,  and  the  preparation  claimed  to  be 
a  cure  for  "coughs  and  colds  and  sore  throats" 
(Fike  1987: 25). 

In  addition  to  the  medicinal  bottles  and  jars 
from  the  boardinghouse,  there  were  three 
colorless  medicine  droppers.  Also  recovered 
was  a  narrow,  colorless,  solid  glass  rod,  2  cm  long, 
that  fit  tightly  into  a  circular  glass  bead.  The  rod 
and  bead  appear  to  have  been  part  of  a  syringe 
handle,  very  similar  to  several  illustrated  in  the 
1880  Whitall  Tatum  &  Co.  catalog  (1880:  59). 


Toiletry 

Operation  A 

The  tenement  yielded  one  milk  glass  partial 
base  and  body  from  a  toiletry  vessel.  The  square 
or  rectangular  bottle  was  recovered  from 
Feature  44,  a  dark  soil  stain  connected  to  a  drain 
box.  It  was  embossed  on  at  least  one  side  with  a 
scroll-like  design  and  contained  either  perfume 
or  a  toiletry.  Milk  glass  was  most  widely  used  for 
container  glass  beginning  in  the  late  1800s 
(Jones  and  Sullivan  1985: 14). 


Operation   B 

Bases  and  bodies  from  three  whole  toiletry 
vessels  were  recovered  from  the  boardinghouse 
backlot.  One  whole  vessel  and  one  almost  whole 
vessel  were  recovered.  Of  the  datable  vessels, 
two  were  machine-made  and  two  were  mold- 
made. 

There  was  a  partial  base  and  body  from  a  grey- 
white,  opalescent  bottle  that  had  similar 
attributes  to  known  cologne  bottle  types 
(McKearin  and  McKearin  1941:  454,  pi.  244).  The 
round  base  was  footed,  measured  approximately 
4.5  cm,  and  there  was  a  molded  ribbed  design  on 
the  vessel's  base  and  lower  body.  It  was  made 
between  about  1850  and  1900.  There  were  also 
screw-thread  rims  and  bodies  from  one  opaque 
green  jar  and  one  machine-made,  opaque  blue 
jar  that  had  probably  contained  a  toiletry  or 
cosmetic. 

The  tenement  yielded  one  screw-top  Vaseline 
ointment  jar  (Figure  7-7r).  It  was  machine- 
manufactured  after  1908  (Fike  1987.  56)  and 
measured  4  cm  x  6.5  cm.  One  other  small, 
colorless,  mold-made  vessel  that  had  held 
perfume  or  cologne  was  complete  except  for  the 
neck  and  finish.  It  had  a  square  base  that 
measured  2.5  cm.  The  body  was  4  cm  tall,  with 
rounded  shoulders. 


Alcohol  (Liquor) 

Operation  A 

There  were  18  liquor  bottles  recovered  from 
the  tenement.  Three  were  whole  flasks  and  15 
were  represented  by  bases  and  finishes.  One 
flask  was  restorable.  There  was  one  amber 
bottle,  and  the  rest  were  made  of  colorless  glass. 

No  pictoral  flasks,  bottle  types  widely  used 
during  the  early  to  mid-19th  century,  were 
recovered.  Thirteen  were  pint  or  half-pint  oval  or 
rectangular  flasks,  and  two  were  cylindrical 
fifths.  Nine  of  the  bottles  were  mold  made  after 
1880  and  nine  were  machine-made  after  1910. 

Six  rectangular  bases  to  the  liquor  flasks  could 
be  accurately  measured;  four  were  4.5  cm  x  7.5 
cm,  and  two  were  4  cm  x  6.5  cm.  Three  round 
bases  that  measured  2.5  cm  in  diameter  may 
have  come  from  miniature  whiskies,  although 
the  bottles  could  have  contained  a  food  product. 
Three  of  the  molded  vessels  (and  proably  others) 
were  made  after  1892,  as  they  were 
"Guaranteed"  and  /or  vent  molded. 

Three  whole,  pint  liquor  flasks  were  recovered 
from  level  B  of  the  tenement  privy  (Feature  45). 
All  were  machine-made  and  date  between  1910 
and  1920  (Figures  7-91,  7-9  ctr,  7-9r).  Two  of  the 


132    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  7-11.    Partial  Rickett's  "wine"  base.    Base  from  yard  scatter.    (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


/ 


f;\x -jV  -it..   VivA;--"  /■V-:V:" . 

»  **>-■*  i  ..;c.\&i : '  V  ••''•••'...  '."■  "  •  ■ 


I  0$M 


SCALE  1:1 


Figure  7-12.    Detail  of  embossing  on  Rickett's  "wine"  base.    (Drawing  by  Leslie  A. 
Mead.) 


Medicine,  Alcohol,  and  Soda  Vessels    133 


flasks  measured  4.5  cm  x  7.5  cm  x  21  cm.  One 
was  embossed  "ONE  PINT"  and  the  other 
"GUARANTEED  16  OZ.  FULL  PINT."  The  third 
flask  was  embossed  "H.  SWARTZ  &  Co. 
LEVERETT  ST.  BOSTON  MASS,"  and  "FULL 
PINT."  It  measured  4.5  cm  x  7.5  cm  x  23  cm. 
Swartz  was  a  liquor  dealer  in  business  between 
1912  and  1920.  A  fourth  pint  flask  was  almost 
fully  mendable.  Vent  molded,  it  was  embossed 
"Guaranteed"  and  "P.  Dempsey  Boston,  Mass." 
Dempsey  was  a  liquor  distributor  in  Boston  and 
Lowell  between  1892  and  1915  and  advertised  in 
the  Lowell  Directory  (Figure  7-10). 


Operation  B 

Bases  and  finishes  from  seven  different  wine 
bottles  were  recovered  from  the  boardinghouse, 
of  which  five  were  mold-made  and  two  were  heat 
altered  and  could  not  be  dated.  Three  green 
finishes  had  flat  string  rims  and  flat  lips.  Two 
were  probably  made  between  1880-1910  (one 
from  Feature  6),  and  one  dark  olive  green  finish 
could  be  dated  no  more  closely  than  after  the 
1850s.  There  were  bases  from  two  turn-molded 
wine  bottles,  one  bright  aqua  and  one  green, 
manufactured  between  1880-1920. 


Operation   B 

All  of  the  36  liquor  bottles  were  represented  by 
bases  and  finishes.  Five  bottles  were  light  green 
or  aqua,  one  was  amber,  with  the  rest  colorless. 
There  were  28  pint  or  half-pint  flasks  and  two 
cylindrical  fifths.  Six  bases  were  probably  from 
miniature  whiskies.  Four  small  brandy-type 
finishes  (bore  diameter  of  1  cm)  were  probably 
part  of  four  of  these  bottles.  Of  the  34  datable 
bases  and  finishes,  26  were  mold-manufactured, 
all  after  1880,  and  eight  were  machine- 
manufactured  after  1910.  Fourteen  of  the  mold- 
made  bottles  date  after  1890,  including  one  P. 
Dempsey  flask  identical  to  the  one  recovered 
from  Operation  A. 


Wine 

Operation  A 

The  tenement  yielded  one  base  and  one  finish 
to  two  different  wine  bottles,  both  mold  made. 
The  partial  base  was  part  of  an  English  "wine" 
bottle  (Figures  7-11,  7-12).  Such  vessels  held  a 
variety  of  beverages  including  wine,  porter, 
cider,  and  distilled  liquor.  Made  of  black  glass, 
the  bottle  was  manufactured  in  a  "Ricketts" 
mold  between  the  late  1830s  and  late  1840s 
(Jones  1986:  98)  and  had  a  sand -type  pontil  scar. 
The  base  measured  approximately  9.7  cm  in 
diameter.  In  a  circle  around  the  bottom  edge  of 
the  base  was  embossed  "H.  RICKETTS  &  CO 
GLASSWORKS  BRISTOL."  The  olive-green 
finish,  which  represents  the  second  wine  bottle, 
was  formed  with  a  finishing  tool.  It  had  a  flat 
string  rim  and  a  downward-sloping  lip.  A 
common  finish  for  French  wines  and 
champagnes,  it  was  first  used  in  France  in  the 
mid-19th  century  (Dumbrell  1983:  135).  The 
manufacture  dates  of  other  artifacts  in  the  same 
provenience  as  the  finish  (Feature  25/D,  the 
cellar),  however,  places  the  bottle's  manufacture 
around  1900. 


Beer 

Operation  A 

The  tenement  yielded  finishes  to  four 
different  beer  bottles.  Two  amber  crown  finishes 
were  mold  made  between  1892  and  1920  (one 
from  Feature  45/B,  the  privy)  and  two  were 
machine  made  after  1908.  There  were  numerous 
body  fragments,  probably  to  the  same  bottles  as 
the  finishes,  embossed  with  the  words  "Harvard 
Brew  Company."  This  Lowell  brewery  advertised 
in  the  City  Directory  beginning  in  1898  (Figure 
7-13). 


Operation  B 

There  were  bases  and  finishes  to  five  different 
mold-made,  amber  and  green  beer  bottles 
recovered  from  the  boardinghouse.  Two 
identical  amber  bases  measured  5  cm  in 
diameter,  and  the  heels  were  embossed  "EHE 
CO."  The  Edward  H.  Everett  Glass  Company  of 
Newark,  Ohio,  associated  with  this  mark,  was  in 
business  between  1883  and  1904  (Toulouse  1971: 
185).  One  of  the  amber  bases  was  recovered 
from  level  A  in  the  privy  (Feature  61). 


Soda 

Operation  A 

There  were  bases  and  finishes  from  two 
colorless  and  two  green  soda  bottles  recovered. 
The  tenement  also  yielded  one  whole  and  one 
nearly  whole,  colorless  soda  bottle.  Five  were 
mold  made  (four  after  1892  and  one  after  1880), 
and  one,  from  the  level  A  of  the  bulkhead 
(Feature  23),  was  machine-manufactured  after 
1908.  All  the  vessels  have  been  designated  soda, 
but  it  must  be  noted  that  it  is  sometimes 
difficult,  if  not  impossible,  to  distinguish  between 
soda  and  mineral  water  containers  (Munsey 
1970: 101). 


134   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


h 


"SuT>- ■>:,■£ 


*  "America's  Health  Beverage!"  < 


*v. 


i 

t 


§ 


HARVARD 

$1000.Q0 

PURE    BEER. 


j  ..„.w^,SOLD     BY 

j  FIRST-CLASS  DEALERS 

TIIHOUGHOUT    Till' 

I    Central,  Eastern  and  Atlantic  Coast  States. 
! 

Brewery  and  Main  Office: 

!       HARVARD  BREWING  CO. 

LOWELL,    MASS. 


n 


** 


Figure  7-13.   Advertisement  in  1901  Lowell  City  Directory  for  Harvard  Brew  Company. 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Medicine,  Alcohol,  and  Soda  Vessels    135 


Figure  7-14   Three  soda  bottles.    Left,  embossed  P.Kelley  &  Co.   Center,  embossed  P. 
Kelley.  Right,  embossed  Jas.  Calnin  &  Co.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  7-15.    Detail  of  the  Kelley  and  Calnin  soda  bottles.    (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.) 


136   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


e;stabl!8Hl:d 


YKAU8. 


THK 


|yox  POPULI  PRESS 

...PRINTERS... 

218  CENTRAL  STREET, 

WE  KNOW  OUR  BUSINESS. 

WE  STICK  TO  IT LOWELL.    MASS. 


-MANCI'MITKLK  !*■ 


SODA,  MINERAL  WATER  and  GINGER  ALE 

Agent  for   Portnmoutlt    llrewln*  Co.'*  Ale  And  Porter,  ttml   Mac*™ 
r'ttllH  S|»r»y,  Hnil  Conmiiiierw*   i.njter. 

WHOLESALE  and  RETAIL.  19,  26  and  27  DAVIDSON  ST.,  LOWELL. 


F.  A.  TOBINS   PRINTERY, 

Commerical  Printing  °JL!^J?ff^P^ 


NEW     TYPE.     NEW     MACHINERY,     ARTISTIC     WORK 
YOU     SENO     A     POSTAL.     I     WILL     00     THE     REST 


Rooms  13  and   14,  ASSOCIATE  BUILDINU. 


LOWELL,  MASS. 


D.    P.    KNOWLTON, 

PIANO,  FURNITURE  =  SAFE  MOVER 

IN    AND    OUT    OF    TOWN. 

If  the  Piano  will  not  go  up  your  stairs  I  have  all  the  conveniences  for  putting 

it  in  at  the  window.     Pianos  and  Furniture  Packed  for  Shipping. 

!  PEICES   LOW 

PIANO  BOXES  BOUOHT   AND   SOLD.        STORAOE    FURNISHED.       SATISFACTION    dlVEV 

Office,  20  Prescott  Street,  Lowell,  Mass. 

Re.idei. ':<■,  22  Eiflhteenth  St        Stand,  Market  Street.       Telephone  Connection 


ALKXANDKK    MIKAULT, 

PIANO  AND  ORGAN  TUNER  AND  REPAIRER. 

li,.l„.    -n  .<   M.rr.'l.  II" -k  St""-  1=1  CWlml  "I  .  W  PrMCOIl  HI    "'  «  f  CfnlrAl  SI  .  .Ill  ret.l.r  |.r-i„|.l  alKn'loi. 

Onto.   »n  .1  '"^y;,,^.'.,,,,,,  ,„  ,.„„l„«.  .  I-I...O  m  ■■>"  fn""  I"  I"  •"■  •>>■  ™IU«*  " •■ 

«,,.„!!  Cty  B....a.  A    M....0I1.  C«n    M.nju.r              •■    M»  UNUTKHr   MAI.I-.    I.OMF.I.I..    H.IM. 
Hetldence,  SOS  Fleich»r  St<««<  


il'UVS    .V     Mi-OAWhKV,    l*i-.».»ri€ 


Pool,  Billiards  and  Lunch  Room,  Tobacco  and  Cigars 

MEALS  AT  ALL  HOURS.   HOT  AND  COLD  LUNCHES. 

tm-o.  aoa  niiPPiAgaaiac  mv..     -     IiOWBIa1j._ 


Figure  7-16.   Advertisement  in  1897  Lowell  City  Directory  for  P.  Kelley.  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Medicine,  Alcohol,  and  Soda  Vessels    137 


The  whole  bottle  was  vent  molded,  with  a 
crown  finish,  and  embossed  "P.  KELLEY, 
LOWELL,  MASS"  (Figures  7-14  ctr,  7-15  ctr). 
Kelley  first  appeared  in  the  City  Directory  in 
1885  as  a  manufacturer  and  bottler  of  soda, 
mineral  water,  ale,  and  porter.  By  1897,  he 
advertised  that  he  manufactured  only 
carbonated  beverages  (Figure  7-16).  The  bottle 
measured  5  cm  x  23  cm.  A  base  and  partial  body 
to  a  second,  identical  bottle  was  also  recovered. 
A  third  bottle  in  Feature  23/ D,  the  bulkhead 
(Figures  7-141,  7-15,  left),  with  the  same 
dimensions  as  the  other  two  bottles,  was  also 
vent  molded.  It  was  embossed  "P.  KELLEY  & 
CO.,"  the  name  of  the  firm  after  1906.  The 
company  was  out  of  business  by  1917.  The  fourth 
bottle  was  embossed  "JAS.  CALNIN  &  CO., 
LOWELL,  MASS."  Above  the  company's  name, 
the  bottle  was  marked  "REGISTERED,"  and 
below  it,  'THIS  BOTTLE  NOT  TO  BE  SOLD" 
(Figures  7-14r,  7-15r)  In  business  between  1886 
and  1913,  Calnin  advertised  in  the  1900  Directory 
that  he  manufactured  and  bottled  carbonated 
beverages  and  sold  bottled  ale,  porter,  and  lager 
(Figure  7-10)  .  The  bottle  measured  6  cm  across 
the  base,  18  cm  from  the  base  to  the  start  of  the 
neck,  and  it,  too,  was  vent-molded. 


Operation  B 

Bases  and  finishes  from  seven  green  and 
colorless  soda  bottles  came  from  the 
boardinghouse.  Four  were  mold-made  between 
1892  and  1920,  and  three  were  machine-made 
after  1908. 

One  of  the  crown  finishes  was  probably  from 
the  same  bottle  from  which  a  colorless  body 
fragment  was  embossed  "COL"  "TLIN."  The 
full  embossed  wording  would  read  "COCA 
COLA  BOTTLING  WORKS  PHOENIX, 
ARIZONA."  The  bottle  was  made  between  1905 
and  1915  (Munsey  1970: 110). 


Discussion 

Given  the  overwhelming  percentage  of  glass 
that  was  manufactured  and  deposited  in  the 
backlots  after  1880,  one  can  discuss  with  most 
certainty  patterns  of  behavior  of  residents  who 
lived  in  the  housing  during  those  years. 

There  were  two  overall  differences  among  the 
medicine,  alcohol,  and  soda  assemblages  from 
the  two  operations.  Nearly  twice  as  many  vessels 
were  recovered  from  the  boardinghouse  backlot 
as  compared  to  the  tenement  backlot,  and  many 
more  vessels  were  recovered  from  yard  deposits 
in  the  boardinghouse  as  compared  to  the 
tenement.  The  greater  number  of  individuals  in 


the  boardinghouse  over  time  accounts  in  part  for 
the  difference  in  number  of  vessels,  but  the 
amount  of  scatter  suggests  that  the 
boardinghouse  backlot  was  messier  than  the 
tenement  backlot.  Despite  municipal  refuse 
collection  and  a  mill  regulation  that  stipulated 
yards  were  to  be  kept  free  of  trash 
(Massachusetts  Bureau  of  Statistics  of  Labor 
1882:  291),  residents  tossed  their  empty  glass 
vessels  in  the  yards.  Neither  Boott  management 
(at  least  after  about  1880)  nor  the  post-1900 
owner  (Saiman  Sirk)  evidently  did  much  to 
correct  the  situation. 

There  was  a  heavy  concentration  of  glass  in 
the  tenement  backlot  between  the  bulkhead 
entrance  to  the  cellar  and  the  woodshed.  In  the 
boardinghouse  backlot  a  concentrated  area  of 
glass  ran  between  the  unit's  ell  and  the 
woodshed.  These  areas  were  logical  pathways 
from  the  units  to  the  woodsheds  and  the  privies 
they  housed,  and  residents  must  have  dropped 
or  tossed  trash  there  on  their  way  to  and  from 
the  woodsheds. 

The  types  of  products  in  the  two  backlots  and 
the  percentages  of  medicine,  alcohol,  and  soda 
glass  from  both  assemblages  were  almost 
identical.  The  relative  amounts,  however,  were 
probably  significantly  underrepresented. 
Municipal  refuse  collection  and  consumption  of 
products  away  from  the  housing  are  two  factors 
to  consider,  and,  in  all  likelihood,  workers  also 
returned  bottles  for  deposit.  Today  this  practice 
has  more  to  do  with  environmental  concerns 
than  economic  motives,  but  recycling  of  glass 
containers  in  the  late  19th  and  early  20th 
centuries  was  done  largely  for  economic  reasons 
(Cheney  1982;  Busch  1987).  Soda,  milk,  and 
whiskey  bottles  were  returned  most  frequently, 
particularly  those  that  were  embossed.  Workers 
probably  carted  empty  containers  to  the  local 
junk  dealer  or  back  to  the  store  for  cash. 

Although  the  sample  may  be  too  small  to  be 
able  to  draw  conclusions,  it  is  possible  that 
workers  also  saved  money  by  purchasing  locally- 
made  products  more  often  than  products 
shipped  from  a  distance.  The  place  of 
manufacture  for  29  vessels  could  be  identified. 
Fourteen  bottles  represented  six  separate  Lowell 
companies,  and  three  bottles  came  from  other 
Massachusetts  towns.  The  other  products  had 
been  shipped  from  New  York,  New  Jersey, 
Maryland,  Iowa,  Ohio,  Arizona,  and  California. 

Beginning  in  the  1830s,  Lowell  had  been 
linked  by  rail  with  Boston,  a  major  transportation 
center.  Thus,  it  is  not  surprising  that  products — 
not  just  luxuries,  but  everyday  commodities — 
from  as  far  away  as  the  West  Coast  were  sold  in 
Lowell  by  the  1880s.    Locally-made  products, 


138   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


however,  were  probably  cheaper  than  products 
made  elsewhere,  and  the  difference  in  cost  may 
have  swayed  workers  toward  local  brands.  The 
possibility  cannot  be  dismissed,  however,  that, 
when  recovered  from  the  ground,  Lowell 
products  were  simply  easier  to  identify. 

None  of  the  proprietary  medicine  vessels 
could  be  identified  as  having  contained 
remedies  sold  for  gender-specific  ailments.  The 
decorative  cosmetic  and  cologne  containers, 
however,  can  almost  certainly  be  associated  with 
female  use.  Although  perhaps  these  little 
"luxuries"  lessened  the  monotony  of  the  mill 
routine,  they  served  a  practical  purpose  as  well. 
The  fragrances  were  probably  used  as  a 
replacement  for  a  daily  bath.  Despite  the  fact 
that  the  mill  workers  spent  many  hours  a  day  in 
hot,  dusty  mill  rooms,  workers  complained  that 
they  were  given  neither  the  time  nor  the  space  to 
maintain  "personal  cleanliness  and  frequent 
bathing  so  necessary  to  health"  (Female  Labor 
Reform  Association  1845:  n.p.). 

Workers  must  have  felt  debilitated  much  of 
the  time  from  the  over-heated,  under-ventilated 
mill  rooms,  and,  along  with  everyday  aches  and 
pains,  the  unhealthful  work  environment  no 
doubt  contributed  to  the  heavy  consumption  of 
proprietary  medicines  by  the  Boott  residents. 
Medicines  represented  48%  of  the  assemblage 
from  the  tenement  and  45%  of  the  assemblage 
from  the  boardinghouse. 

The  fact  that  the  cures  contained  potentially 
addictive  drugs,  however,  also  played  a  part  in 
their  purchase.  Although  products  were  touted 
as  cures  for  everything  from  ringworm  to  gout  to 
consumption,  in  reality,  most  of  the  nostroms 
were  concocted  with  flavorings,  herbs,  and 
copious  amounts  of  alcohol.  By  1900  some 
brands  had  such  a  high  alcohol  content  that  they 
required  a  liquor  license  for  their  sale  (Ketchum 
1965:  90).  Many  cures  also  "contained  harmful 
amounts  of  codeine,  cocaine,  morphine,  heroine, 
canabis  indica  and  phenobarbitol"  (Berkow, 
quoted  in  Baugher-Perlin  1978:  146).  If  the 
products  did  not  cure  the  illnesses,  at  least  they 
numbed  the  pain  and  discomfort. 

"Cures"  were  no  cheaper  than  beverage 
alcohol  and,  at  lea^t  in  the  mid-1 800s,  were  more 
expensive.  At  mid-century  nostrums  cost  on 
average  one  dollar  a  bottle,  while  whiskey  could 
be  had  for  25<S  a  gallon  (Williams  1980:  559).  In 
1887,  one  Lowell  druggist  sold  his  own  brand  of 
Sarsaparilla  for  55<t  a  bottle  (Vox  Populi,  October 
8,  1887).  He  did  not  state  how  much  a  bottle 
contained,  but  medicines  were  commonly  sold 
in  sizes  up  to  a  quart  (Munsey  1970:  69).  The 
druggist  sold  a  pint  of  his  best-grade  whiskey  for 
50c  and  his  cheapest  grade  for  25t.  The  quantity 


of  medicines  purchased  despite  the  cost  may 
well  be  indicative  of  workers'  ill  health  and  their 
desire  to  "try  anything"  to  feel  relief. 

For  women  in  19th-century  America,  the 
purchase  of  patent  medicine  took  on  an  added 
dimension.  Morphine-based  medications  were 
often  prescribed  to  treat  "female  complaints," 
along  with  headaches,  fatigue,  and  anxiety,  and, 
during  the  19th  century,  the  majority  of  opiate 
addicts  were  women  (Mendelson  and  Mello 
1985:  47).  It  has  also  been  estimated  that,  after 
the  Civil  War,  one  out  of  every  ten  women  was  a 
"hidden  alcoholic"  (Lender  and  Martin  1982: 
118).  With  the  number  of  women  involved  in 
temperance  campaigns  and  the  growth  of  the 
male-dominated  saloon,  many  women  who 
drank  did  so  privately.  The  substitution  of 
medicinal  nostroms  for  beverage  alcohol 
afforded  women  a  socially  acceptable  means  of 
alcohol  consumption.  Given  that  boardinghouse 
#45  housed  only  women  until  about  1890,  and 
the  stigma  associated  with  alcohol  use,  these 
factors  could  easily  have  contributed  to  the 
purchase  of  medicines  by  the  Boott  workers. 

Both  males  and  females  in  the  Boott  housing 
had  another  reason  to  disguise  alcohol  intake,  as 
the  Lowell  mills  forbade  beverage  alcohol  in  the 
company's  housing.  Although  the  rule 
disappeared  from  published  regulations  after 
the  Civil  War  and  may  not  have  been  fully 
enforced  from  then  on  (Bond  1989:  10),  a  series 
of  Boott  letters  (Boott  Mills  Correspondence 
Book  1888-1891;  see  Chapter  3  and  Appendix  A, 
this  volume)  provide  solid  evidence  that,  as  late 
as  the  1890s,  workers  were  dismissed  for  alleged 
drunkenness.  Among  the  workers  fired  were 
individuals  who  boarded  in  unit  #45,  one  of  the 
units  explored  during  the  archeological 
investigation.  In  one  instance,  a  boarder  in  #45 
was  dismissed  because  he  had  been  seen 
bringing  bottles  of  liquor  into  the  house. 

Even  after  the  Boott  began  to  sell  off  the 
housing  in  1899,  management  continued  to 
attempt  to  regulate  workers'  behavior  regarding 
alcohol.  There  was  a  stipulation  in  the  deed  of 
sale  to  the  new  owner  that  the  conveyance  be 
made  subject  to  the  perpetual  restriction  that  no 
intoxicating  liquor  ever  be  sold  on  any  part  of  the 
premises  (Middlesex  County  Deeds  1899,  Book 
314:  206). 

Evidence  of  workers'  alcohol  use  before  1880  is 
meager:  one  English  "wine"  bottle  and,  possibly, 
one  French  wine  bottle  pre-date  1880.  The 
evidence  as  it  stands  suggests  that  most  of  the 
women  and  supervisory  personnel  who  lived  in 
the  units  during  the  earlier  part  of  the  19th 
century  either  did  not  drink  beverage  alcohol,  or 
they  consumed  it  elsewhere.   Yet  the  evidence  is 


Medicine,  Alcohol,  and  Soda  Vessels    139 


really  inconclusive  and  may  not  be  an  accurate 
gauge  of  alcohol  consumption.  One  can  say  only 
that  the  data  neither  support  nor  explode  the 
mills'  contention  that  "intemperance  was  most 
carefully  excluded"  (Miles  1846:  131). 

In  sharp  contrast  to  the  small  number  of 
earlier  vessels,  36%  of  the  containers  from  the 
tenement  and  43%  from  the  boardinghouse  were 
liquor,  wine,  or  beer  bottles  manufactured  after 
1880.  The  mean  manufacture  dates  of  many  of 
the  mold-made  bottles  (1900-1910,  or  later)  and 
the  presence  of  machine-made  bottles  made 
after  1904  indicate  that  some,  if  not  a  good  deal, 
of  these  bottles  were  discarded  in  the  backlots 
after  the  sale  of  the  units  in  1900.  Once  the  units 
were  sold,  residents  may  not  have  been 
permitted  to  sell  liquor  in  the  units,  but  the 
regulation  against  alcohol  use  was  probably 
abandoned. 

The  bottle  dump  or  cache  in  the  tenement 
woodshed  (Feature  46),  near  the  privy  indicates, 
however,  that,  at  some  point,  the  woodshed  was 
used  as  a  repository  for  liquor  and  medicine 
bottles.  The  fact  that  the  bottles  had  been 
deposited  whole  and  remained  unbroken  for  a 
period  of  time  indicates  that  the  bottles  were  set 
carefully  under  a  step,  a  platform,  or  even  the 
woodshed  floor.  Perhaps  workers  drank  in  the 
woodshed,  away  from  a  keeper's  or  agent's 
watchful  eye,  and  then  hid  the  bottles.  If  so,  in 
light  of  the  municipal  trash  collection  in  Lowell, 
this  would  help  explain  the  cache.  The 
woodsheds  in  the  rear  of  the  row,  hidden  from 
the  street,  would  have  been  a  relatively  safe  spot 
to  hide  bottles,  empty  or  full. 

The  majority  of  alcohol  containers  were  pint  or 
half-pint  flasks  rather  than  cylindrical  fifths,  and 
liquor  flasks  far  outnumbered  soda,  beer  and 
wine  bottles.  Workers'  income  is  one  factor  that 
may  have  necessitated  purchasing  non- 
essentials, such  as  alcohol,  in  small  containers, 
but  flasks  were  also  easier  to  conceal  (e.g.,  in 
one's  pocket).  Even  if  one  takes  into  account 
recycling  and  trash  collection,  the  relative 
number  of  whiskey  flasks  compared  to  other 
bottles  suggests  that  liquor  was  favored  over 
fermented  and  non-alcoholic  drinks.  If  in  fact 
distilled  beverages  were  preferred,  ethnicity  of 
the  workers,  personal  preference,  and  cost  of 
product  were  probably  all  determining  factors 
that  influenced  workers'  choice  of  beverage. 
Regardless  of  what  workers  drank,  however,  the 
number  of  bottles  illustrates  that  drinking  was  a 
frequent  activity  of  the  boarders  by  the  end  of 
the  19th  century,  if  not  before. 

In  conclusion,  the  analysis  of  the  medicine, 
alcohol,  and  soda  assemblage  suggests  certain 
patterns  to  Boott  workers'  consumer  behavior 


and  underscores  ways  workers  coped  with  mill 
life  and  adapted  to  the  mills'  policies.  Although 
the  importance  of  factors  such  as  personal 
preference,  ethnicity,  and  availability  of 
products  should  not  be  underestimated  (see 
Chapter  9,  this  volume),  the  assemblage 
suggests  that  workers  may  have  made  consumer 
choices  based,  at  least  some  of  the  time,  on  the 
need  to  economize.  Workers  purchased  some 
beverages,  like  liquor,  in  relatively  small  bottles, 
and  they  may  have  bought  a  greater  percentage 
of  locally-made  products  compared  to  items 
shipped  from  a  distance.  Recycling  of  glass 
containers  can  only  be  inferred  through  the 
assemblage.  In  all  likelihood,  however,  workers 
returned  bottles  for  extra  income. 

Not  all  choices,  however,  centered  around 
economy.  No  doubt  "luxuries,"  such  as 
colognes,  made  life  a  bit  more  pleasant,  but 
fragrances  were  likely  used  as  a  necessary 
substitute  for  a  daily  bath.  The  unhealthy 
environment  of  the  mill  rooms  must  have 
contributed  to  the  consumption  of  quantities  of 
medicine,  and  these  products  may  also  have 
been  used  as  a  socially  acceptable  substitute  for 
beverage  alcohol.  Alcohol  was  clearly,  however, 
a  product  many  workers  purchased  and,  despite 
company  regulations,  drinking  was  an  activity 
workers  were  unwilling  to  relinquish  (see  Bond 
1988  for  a  full  discussion  of  this  topic).  The 
regulation,  however,  may  have  necessitated — at 
least  in  some  instances — careful  disposal  of 
liquor  containers. 

Patterns  within  the  medicine,  alcohol,  and 
soda  assemblage  illustrate  some  of  the  complex 
set  of  decisions  made  by  workers  who  lived  with 
a  "corporate  pattern  of  consumption  and 
lifestyle"  (Beaudry  and  Mrozowski  1987:  6).  Cost 
of  products,  an  individual's  personal  preference 
and  ethnic  background,  and  societal  values  were 
all  factors  in  the  consumer  choices  made  by  the 
workers.  Overarching  elements  to  these  factors, 
however,  were  the  ever-present  company 
policies  and  their  results,  such  as  an  unhealthy 
work  environment  (cf.  Gross  1988),  and  the  mill 
regulations,  such  as  the  proscription  against 
alcohol  use,  with  which  workers  also  had  to 
contend. 


140   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Chapter  8 

ANALYSIS  OF  PERSONAL  EFFECTS  FROM 
EXCAVATIONS  OF  THE  BOOTT  MILLS  BOARDINGHOUSE  BACKLOTS  IN 

LOWELL,  MASSACHUSETTS 

by  Grace  H.  Ziesing 


Introduction 

The  artifacts  analyzed  for  this  chapter  include 
all  those  related  to  personal  clothing  and 
adornment.  These  include  buttons,  beads  and 
jewelry,  textiles,  leather,  and  hair  combs  and 
ornaments.  The  analysis  of  this  class  of  artifacts 
is  particularly  germane  to  the  residential 
problem  focus  detailed  in  the  research  design 
for  the  overall  Boott  Mills  project  (Beaudry  and 
Mrozowski  1987:  6).  Specifically,  it  was 
hypothesized  that  an  examination  of  personal 
effects  would  have  particular  applicability  to  the 
study  of  worker  consumer  behavior  since  other 
classes  of  material  (e.g.,  furnishings,  cutlery, 
tableware,  food,  etc.)  would  have  been  provided 
by  the  corporation  or  the  boardinghouse  keeper. 
Objects  related  to  personal  clothing  and 
adornment  are  not  the  only  artifacts  germane  to 
a  study  of  worker  consumer  behavior,  however. 
Tobacco  pipes  and  bottles  (particularly  those 
that  would  have  contained  medicines  or 
alcoholic  beverages)  are  two  other  classes  of 
objects  that  relate  directly  to  personal,  as 
opposed  to  corporate,  behavior.  Both  groups  of 
artifacts  receive  detailed  treatment  in  this 
volume  with  cogent  analyses  of  their  potential 
meaning  and  significance  in  terms  of  a  study  of 
working  class  consumer  patterns  (see  Cook  on 
tobacco  pipes  and  Bond  on  bottles). 

In  examining  the  personal  effects  excavated 
from  the  Lowell  backlots  three  major  goals  were 
sought.  First,  an  itemization  and  thorough 
description  of  the  assemblages  with  an 
emphasis  on  their  chronological  implications. 
Second,  a  discussion  of  what  the  assemblages 
reveal  about  worker  clothing  and  personal 
adornment  including  a  discussion  of  their 
gender  affiliations.  And  finally,  what,  if  anything, 
could  be  determined  about  worker  consumer 
behavior  as  it  was  outlined  in  the  initial  research 
design.  A  corollary  of  this  original  hypothesis  is 
that  a  comparison  of  the  assemblages  at  the 
tenement  house  backlot  (Operation  A)  and  the 
boardinghouse  backlot  (Operation  B)  should 
reveal  different  patterns  of  consumption 
(Beaudry  and  Mrozowski  1987:  6)  that  may  or 
may  not  be  reflected  in  the  personal  effects. 


The  following  discussion  is  broken  down  into 
functional  types.  Each  section  will  include  a 
description  of  the  artifact  class,  including  an 
explanation  of  cataloging  decisions,  and  a 
detailed  itemization  of  the  artifacts  by 
provenience.  A  discussion  of  patterns  and  some 
preliminary  interpretations  will  follow. 


Buttons  and  Studs 

A  total  of  142  artifacts  were  cataloged  as 
buttons,  21  of  which  are  actually  clothing  studs 
(characterized  by  a  short  neck  with  a  flat  base  on 
one  end  and  a  usually  smaller,  rounded  knob  on 
the  other;  see  Figure  8-2).  All  buttons  and  studs 
were  cataloged  by  material  of  manufacture, 
each,  with  its  chronological  implications,  to  be 
discussed  below.  Of  the  121  buttons,  86  (or  71%) 
are  white  utilitarian  sew-through  buttons  made 
of  porcelain  (Figure  8-1),  while  another  5  are  of 
colored  porcelain  and  3  are  hemispherical 
shank-type  white  porcelain  (2  of  these  appear  to 
be  shoe  buttons).  Only  8  of  the  buttons  are 
metal,  12  are  various  forms  of  glass,  5  are  made 
from  shell,  and  just  1  is  plastic  and  1  is  wood.  Of 
the  studs,  13  (or  62%)  are  made  of  white 
porcelain  (Figure  8-2),  1  of  glass,  and  7  of  metal. 

Metal  buttons,  by  far  the  most  well  studied 
and  thoroughly  reported  type  of  fastener,  occur 
throughout  the  historical  period  in  North 
America.  Technological  and  stylistic  changes 
render  metal  buttons  a  useful  chronological 
indicator  (Noel  Hume  1969).  Of  particular  utility 
are  military  buttons  which  varied  from  regiment 
to  regiment,  thus  adding  a  spatial  dimension  to 
their  value  as  interpretive  tools.  Unfortunately, 
the  metal  buttons  from  Lowell  are  for  the  most 
part  heavily  corroded  and  undiagnostic  save  for 
two  that  will  be  discussed  in  greater  detail  below. 
Of  particular  interest,  however,  are  four  of  the 
metal  studs.  These  artifacts  have  been 
cataloged  as  metal,  but  in  actual  fact  they  are  a 
combination  of  metal  coated  with  an 
unidentified  material,  possibly  plastic.  In  one 
case,  only  the  coating  remains.  Despite  the 
advanced  degree  of  deterioration,  these  objects 
have  been  identified  as  "lever-top"  collar  studs 
identical    to    those    advertized    in    the    1895 


141 


142   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


•     ©    ©     o 
0    ©    © 

o  o  o  o    e 
o    ©  ©  © 

GO© 

o   © 

©    ©   © 

©  o 

OOOO 

Figure  8-1.         Some  of  the  86  white  utilitarian  sew-through  porcelain  buttons  excavated 
from  the  Boott  Mills  backlots  in  Lowell  (scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Personal   Effects   143 


*  X  X  X 


Figure  8-2.         A  few  of  the  plain  white  porcelain  stationary  collar  studs  excavated  from  the 
Boott  Mills  backlots  in  Lowell  (scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S. 
Kanaski.) 


COLLAR  BUTTONS  COLD  AND  COLD  PLATED.     Prices,  Each. 

Nos-  70087  to  20093  are  solderless.  one  piece  buttons. 


A     3& 


20067 

2008S 

20O91 

20093 

200(15 

suit  ionary  Top. 

Stationary  Top. 

Stationary  Top. 

Stationary  Top. 

i.eier  Top.  Rol 

solid  gold.  $1.25. 

gold  tilled.  $o.>9. 

gold  tilled.  $o.2.Y 

gold  filled.  $0.20. 

plate.  $0.25 

2(m>kh   Same  In 

2009O  Same  In 

20092  Same   in 

20094    Same  In 

gold  tilled.  *>  .10 

■olid  gold.  SI. 10 

solid  gold.  $10.". 

solid  gold.  SI  00 

20103 

Separable  Gold 

Front.  SO-35. 

20103*  Same  Solid 

Gold.  $1.25 


A  H/'fcfc. 


20105 
Stone  Set.  plate 
22c.    Gold.  $1.25 


20106     Ladies'  Rrll- 
llant  Set.  $0.25. 
20107  i.cilil  Diamond 
Set.  $t  50 
20107  A  Same  In 
Rolled  I'late  15c 


2<MK»S 
Lever  Top.  Rol1 
plate   $n  15 
201197    Same  in 
solid  gold.  1 1  iki 


20108 
Roll  Plate  Tie 
Holder.  $0.15 


Q 


2000H 
Lever  Top.  Rol 
plate.  $o.lo 
20ii!i!>  same   li 
solid  gold.  S»  «•' 


20100 

Pearl.  $0.10 
Perdoz.  $l.O0. 
201  lo  Bone.  $o.ol 
Perdoz.  $0.10 


1 

roll  plate  ?" 
201O1  Same 

solid  KOliI  fl 


20111 

Pearl  bark. 
Sboe  front.  JO  13 
Aluminum.  $<i  1<> 


Figure  8-3.  Stationary  and  lever-top  collar  studs  available  from  the  1895  Montgomery 
Ward  catalog.   Note  that  these  are  specifically  identified  as  collar  buttons,  and  that  one 
is  labelled  exclusively  for  ladies.  (Reproduced  courtesy  of  Dover  Publications,  Inc.) 


144   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Montgomery  Ward  catalog  (Montgomery  Ward 
&  Co.  [hereafter  MW]  1895:  173;  Figure  8-3) 
except  that  they  are  not  gold  plated. 

Glass  buttons  grew  in  popularity  during  the 
19th  century  beginning  in  the  1840s  (Luscomb 
1967:  80;  Epstein  1968:  45).  They  were  available  in 
many  colors  and  shapes  and  were  primarily 
imported  from  Bohemia  (Jones  1924:  39;  Albert 
and  Adams  1951:  92,  98)  although  they  were 
surely  produced  elsewhere  as  well.  Sourcing  and 
dating  glass  buttons  is  very  difficult  because  of 
the  great  variety  manufactured,  many  of  which 
continued  in  popularity  for  decades  (Luscomb 
1967:  80;  Epstein  1968:  45).  The  most  diagnostic 
kind  of  glass  buttons  are  black  glass  which  came 
into  vogue  in  the  1860s  when  they  were  used  as  a 
substitute  for  jet.  Jet  buttons  and  jewelry  were 
made  popular  by  Queen  Victoria  when  she  went 
into  mourning  after  the  death  of  Prince  Albert  in 
1861  (Hughes  and  Lester  1981:  6;  Albert  and 
Adams  1951: 98, 100;  Epstein  1968:  48-49).  Real  jet 
buttons  are  extremely  rare,  but  black  glass 
buttons,  often  called  "jet,"  are  very  common. 
The  continuing  association  between  jet  and 
black  glass  is  evident  in  the  mail-order  catalogs 
of  the  1890s  where  "jet"  is  sold  at  extremely  low 
prices  (Sears,  Roebuck  and  Co.  [hereafter  SR] 
1897:  320;  Figure  8-4)  and  is  most  probably  black 
glass.  Many  pressed  black  glass  and  small  black 
glass  buttons  were  imported  into  the  United 
States  from  Bohemia  and  Austria  from  ca.  1870 
until  ca.  1880  when  they  began  to  be 
manufactured  domestically  (Hughes  and  Lester 
1981:  83,  89)  (see  Figure  8-10  for  black  glass 
buttons  excavated  at  Lowell). 

Buttons  made  of  naturally  occurring  materials 
such  as  wood  and  shell  are  difficult  to  date  with 
any  precision  as  they  were  manufactured 
throughout  the  19th  century  (if  not  before)  and 
can  still  be  found  today  (Rose  and  Santeford 
1985:  41;  Hughes  and  Lester  1981:  230-231,  251). 
Flat  two-  and  four-hole  sew-through  shell 
buttons  of  the  variety  excavated  at  Lowell  have 
been  identified  in  18th-century  archeological 
contexts  in  Michigan  (Stone  1974:  59-60).  Shell 
buttons,  however,  were  not  made  in  the  United 
States  until  at  least  the  beginning  of  the  19th 
century  (Hughes  and  Lester  1981:  230)  and  it  was 
not  until  ca.  1900  that  the  importation  of  shell 
buttons  was  significantly  affected  by  a  rise  in 
domestic  production  (Jones  1924:  94).  Until  the 
middle  of  the  19th  century  when  mass 
production  was  made  possible  by  a  machine 
process  for  cutting  shell,  shell  buttons  were 
made  in  small  quantities  by  hand  (Epstein  1968: 
60). 

Plastic  buttons  are  neat  chronological 
indicators  as  long  as  the  specific  material  from 


which  they  are  made  can  be  identified.  Celluloid 
was  discovered  as  early  as  the  mid-1850s  but  was 
not  produced  commercially  until  1869  when  it 
was  developed  as  a  substitute  for  ivory 
(Anonymous  1988:  5;  Hughes  and  Lester  1981: 
57).  Celluloid  immediately  became  a  popular 
material  for  buttons  and  other  small  decorative 
items  as  it  was  ideal  for  imitating  many  natural 
materials  such  as  tortoise  shell,  glass,  and  horn. 
Even  though  celluloid  was  highly  flammable  its 
popularity  continued  through  World  War  II,  but 
it  was  eventually  replaced  by  non-flammable 
acrylics  such  as  lucite  that  were  developed  in  the 
1930s.  Celluloid  can  be  identified  by  the  smell  of 
camphor  that  is  released  when  heat  is  applied. 
Care  must  be  taken,  however,  as  too  much  heat 
can  cause  celluloid  to  burst  into  flames 
(Anonymous  1988:  5;  Hughes  and  Lester  1981:  57, 
66). 

Another  early  plastic  was  casein  which  was 
first  discovered  in  1890  but  was  not  produced 
commercially  until  1919.  Although  still  available 
today,  casein  was  most  popular  from  the  1920s 
through  the  1940s.  Early  casein  buttons  can  be 
identified  by  their  characteristic  creamy  color, 
often  surface-dyed  and  now  faded.  This  material 
is  not  as  flammable  as  celluloid,  but  is  not  heat 
resistant  and  tends  to  warp  (Anonymous  1988:  5; 
Hughes  and  Lester  1981:  66).  The  one  plastic 
button  recovered  in  the  excavations  at  Lowell 
will  be  discussed  in  detail  below. 

The  majority  of  the  buttons  and  studs  in  the 
Lowell  assemblage  are  made  out  of  white 
porcelain,  for  which  very  little  information  exists 
in  the  archeological  literature.  Although  there 
are  several  button  typologies  available  to  the 
archeologist,  most  of  the  collections  reported  in 
the  literature  consist  of  metal  buttons  (often 
military)  or  buttons  dating  to  the  early  19th 
century  and  before  (e.g.,  Noel  Hume  1969:  88-93; 
Calver  and  Bolton  1950;  Stone  1974;  Olsen  1963). 
As  a  starting  point,  it  is  worthy  of  note  that  no 
porcelain  buttons  were  found  in  the  18th-century 
contexts  of  Fort  Michilimackinac  despite  an 
extensive  collection  numbering  1,333  buttons 
broken  down  into  188  categories  (Stone  1974:  45). 
South  (1964)  notes  the  presence  of  porcelain 
buttons  (his  Type  23)  at  Fort  Fisher  and 
Brunswick  Town  in  contexts  dating  from  1800  to 
1865.  The  majority  of  the  Type  23  buttons  (i.e.,  all 
but  two)  are  associated  with  Fort  Fisher  and  an 
1837-1865  context,  however.  In  fact,  29%  of  all 
the  buttons  recovered  from  Fort  Fisher  were  of 
this  variety. 

Despite  its  ubiquity,  South  made  little  attempt 
to  identify  porcelain  buttons  beyond  their 
archeological  context — other  reports  of  these 
artifacts  are  similarly  lacking  in  precision.   Two 


Personal  Effects   145 


BUTTON 

DEPARTMENT. 

Jet  Dress  Buttons.  pr   pr 

^  ^^  Doz.  Gross. 

48%v         4H&        0800  Black  Ball 
HTi  lM        ■  RHI  Cut  Jet  Dress 

W        ^MT  Buttons $0.04  $0.40 

^^  XDr  9805  Black  Ball 

Cut  Jet   Dress 
9800                 9805            Buttons,larger     .05      .50 
9808  Black  Cut  Jet  Ball  Dress  Buttons,  one 
size  larger  than  9806 06      .65 


9827  9829 

Cuts  are  exact  size  of  Buttons.    Per  Doz. 
9827  Fine  Jet  Buttons,  polished, 

smooth  edges  $0.05 

9829  Fine  Jet  Buttons,  polished, 

smooth  edges 05 

9831  Fine  Jet  Buttons,  polished, 

smooth  rim  edge 05 


9831 
Per  Gross 

$0.50 

.50 

.50 


9833  9836  9838 

Cuts  are  exact  size  of  Buttons. 

Per  Do/..        Per  Gross. 
9833  Fine  Jet  Buttons,  dull  pol- 
ished, smooth  rim  edges $0.05  $0.50 

9836  Fine  Jet  Buttons,   polished 

points  in  crescent 05  50 

9838  Fine  Dull  Jet  Buttons,  pol- 


Figure  8-4.  A  sample  of  "jet"  buttons  available  from  Montgomery  Ward  in  1895. 
(Reproduced  courtesy  of  Dover  Publications,  Inc.) 


146   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Agate  Buttons,White  and  Colored. 

(See  cuts  for  sizes.) 
^wr  ,.      10280  Agate    Buttons,    white, 
f^m±\      full  shirt  size;    12  dozen  on 

I  C9   )     I'er  card $0.03  I  C  W 

\**/      Six  cards 16V^^ 

10280 

10282 
Per  Per 

gross,  doz. 

10282  Agate  Buttons,  white,  large $0.07      $0.42 

10285    Agate  Buttons, 
white,  large. 

©\  Ter  gross $0.09  /  jgm± 
\  Per  72  doz 48  #  £2*m 
1102K8  Agate  Buttons,  I  VU9 
§     white,  large.  \    MB^ 

.M     Pergross $0.10 

Per72dOZ 6°         10285 

10288 

Per         Per. 
10291    Agate     Buttons,    gross.  72  doz. 

Ox       white,     largest    or   full 
\     underclothing  size $0.11    $0.60 
110293      Agate  Buttons, 
I     white,      colored      edge, 
/      shirt  size  (No.  llA) 14         .75 

10295    Agate    Buttons, 
colored  edge,  shirt   size 

10291  (No.20) 25      1.35 

10297  Agate  Buttons,  white,  colored  edge, 

extra  large  size 35      1.80 

Nos.  10293,  10295  and  10297  come  with  brown, 
black,  green,  pink,  red  or  blue  edges.  Please  mention 
color  wanted. 

White  Fancy  Pearl  Agates, 

(See  cuts  for  style  and  size.); 

.  10300    Pearl  AgPte 

riCKva      Buttons. 

fjpji)  1>e  r  gross "  ■ w  ■  °  8fII!0!!§J  (IHBSi 

10302  Pearl  Agate 
10304           Buttons.                         10302          10300 
Per  12  dozen $0.14 

U^v  10304  Pearl  Agate  Buttons. 

Bar'  Per  gross S020 

*pflEs^  10305    Pearl  Agate  Buttons. 

Per  gross $0.25 

10305 


Figure  8-5.  Plain  and  decorated  porcelain  buttons  ("Agates"  and  "Fancy  Pearl  Agates") 
advertised  in  the  1895  Montgomery  Ward  catalog.   (Reproduced  courtesy  of  Dover 
Publications,  Inc.) 


Personal   Effects   147 


such  buttons  found  in  19th-century  burials  in 
Texas  were  identified  as  white  glass  (Fox  1984:  8, 
12;  Sprague  1989:  132).  Likewise,  the  5  porcelain 
buttons  found  during  investigations  of  the 
Custer  Battlefield  National  Monument  were 
incorrectly  identified  as  milk  glass  (Scott  and  Fox 
1987:  91-92).  Two  other  projects  at  19th-century 
cemeteries  in  Texas  correctly  identified  the 
buttons  and  studs  they  recovered  as  porcelain, 
but  failed  to  elaborate  beyond  simple 
description  and  measurement  (Lebo  1988:  77,  79; 
McReynolds  1981:  32,  33,  34,  37,  42,  43).  The 
exception  is  a  report  of  excavations  at  a  19th- 
century  black  cemetery  in  Arkansas  which 
presents  a  discussion  of  the  manufacturing 
history  of  the  buttons  and  studs  as  well  as  the 
uses  to  which  the  objects  were  put  (Rose  and 
Santeford  1985:  41,  49).  Even  so,  the  discussion  is 
incomplete  and  it  is  clear  that  an  examination  of 
the  archeological  literature  will  not  suffice  to 
explicate  the  development  and  significance  of 
the  plain  white  porcelain  button  during  the  19th 
century. 

Turning  away  from  the  archeological  literature 
to  the  button  collectors'  literature  provides  us 
with  more  precise  information  regarding  this 
ubiquitous  button  type.  Although  porcelain 
buttons  were  available  in  the  early  19th  century, 
they  were  hand  molded  from  wet  clay  and  were 
considered  a  luxury  item  (Hughes  and  Lester 
1981: 31).  Around  1840,  however,  Richard  Prosser 
of  Birmingham,  England,  patented  a  process  for 
making  porcelain  buttons  from  a  dry  china-clay 
powder  that  could  be  compressed  into  molds  to 
mass-produce  small,  uniform  buttons  (Jones 
1924:  40;  Hughes  and  Lester  1981:  31;  Albert  and 
Adams  1951:  111).  The  industry  was  quickly 
taken  over  by  French  manufacturers  who 
dominated  it  from  the  1850s  to  the  early  20th 
century.  The  French  process  was  slightly 
different  as  it  involved  stamping  the  button  out 
of  wet  clay  (Hughes  and  Lester  1981:  31). 
Nonetheless,  by  the  second  half  of  the  19th 
century,  utilitarian  porcelain  buttons  were  widely 
available  in  many  sizes,  shapes,  decorations,  and 
even  different  colors  (Albert  and  Adams  1951: 
111)  as  well  as  being  very  inexpensive: 

A  great  gross,  that  is  twelve  gross  each  of  twelve 
dozen,  is  sold  for  elevenpence,  every  button 
beautifully  made,  regularly  carded  on  good  paper, 
and  admirably  turned  out  in  every  respect;  the  very 
paper  they  are  on  would  be  thought  worth  the 
money  (Turner  1865  quoted  in  Jones  1924: 40). 

It  appears  that  these  buttons  were  particularly 
popular  during  the  second  half  of  the  19th 
century  and  the  very  beginning  of  the  20th 
century.  Mail  order  catalogs  from  the  1890s  to 
the  first  years  of  the  20th  century  list  them  in 


several  sizes  (e.g.,  SR  1897:  320;  MW  1895:  85;  SR 
1908:  1004).  In  contrast,  the  Montgomery  Ward 
catalog  of  1922  (MW  1922:  183)  and  the  Sears 
Roebuck  catalog  of  1936  (SR  1936:  423)  list  no 
porcelain  buttons.  Instead,  the  plain  buttons  are 
made  of  pearl  (some  genuine,  some  synthetic)  or 
vegetable  ivory,  and  the  fancier  ones  are  made 
of  the  plastic  of  the  day  (i.e.,  celluloid  in  1922, 
bakelite  in  1936). 

One  of  the  problems  in  studying  this  kind  of 
button  is  the  plethora  of  names  applied  to  it. 
According  to  Hughes  and  Lester  (1981:  31), 
white-bodied  porcelain  buttons  were  called 
carnelions  by  their  manufacturers.  Agate,  on  the 
other  hand,  was  used  to  refer  to  white-bodied 
earthenware  buttons,  though  the  term  became 
less  precise  over  time  and  eventually  was  used  to 
refer  to  any  white-bodied  china  button.  The 
term  perle  was  used  specifically  by  French 
manufacturers.  Mail-order  catalogs  from  the 
1890s  and  early  1900s  use  the  term  agate  for 
plain  white  and  colored  four-hole  buttons,  but 
call  the  ones  with  decorated  rims  pearl  agates 
(Figure  8-5).  The  term  pearl  (alone)  seems  to  be 
used  consistently  in  the  mail-order  catalogs  and 
by  button  collectors  to  refer  to  buttons  made 
from  shell  and  mother  of  pearl  (e.g.,  SR  1897:  85; 
MW  1895:  320),  although  the  pearl  collar  stud 
advertized  in  the  1895  Montgomery  Ward 
catalog  could  possibly  be  porcelain  (see  Figure 
8-3).  To  avoid  confusion,  therefore,  all  of  the 
ceramic  buttons  and  stud  in  the  Lowell 
assemblage  have  been  cataloged  as  porcelain. 

In  agreement  with  the  patent  date  for  the  dry 
china  powder  process  for  manufacturing 
porcelain  buttons,  all  such  buttons  and  studs 
(including  colored  ones)  have  been  assigned  a 
beginning  manufacture  date  of  1840.  A  formal 
and  decorative  typology  for  these  buttons  has 
been  used  in  the  cataloging  process  (Figure  8-6). 
This  typology  is  based  on  terminology  employed 
by  button  collectors  (e.g.,  Hughes  and  Lester 
1981:  31-33)  and  is  designed  to  simplify  the 
description  and  classification  of  these  ubiquitous 
buttons.  It  is  hoped  that  future  research  will 
bring  to  light  more  information  regarding 
specific  periods  during  which  the  various  forms 
and  /or  decorative  elements  were  popular.  Such 
information  has  the  potential  to  help  greatly 
refine  button  chronologies. 

Throughout  the  following  summary  of  the 
buttons  excavated  from  Lowell,  several  terms 
will  be  employed  to  describe  the  means  with 
which  the  buttons  were  fastened  onto  the 
clothing.  A  brief  discussion  of  the  terminology  is 
in  order.  The  most  prevalent  type  in  the 
assemblage  is  the  sew-through  button  already 
mentioned.    This  simply  refers  to  buttons  with 


148   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


holes — in  this  assemblage  two  or  four  holes. 
Other  buttons  have  various  kinds  of  shanks. 
Although  some  kinds  of  shanks  can  be  used  to 
date  buttons,  the  ones  found  on  the  buttons  in 
the  Lowell  assemblage  are  very  common  and 
were  in  use  for  long  periods  of  time  thus 
rendering  them  useless  as  chronological 
indicators.  Most  common  is  the  loop  shank 
which  is  simply  a  round  or  flat  wire  bent  into  a 
loop  with  the  two  ends  inserted  into  the  back  of 
the  button.  A  variation  on  this  is  a  loop  shank 
that  is  set  into  a  shank  plate  which  is  mounted 
onto  the  back  of  the  button,  or  sometimes  set 
into  a  recess.  Another  type  is  the  self-shank, 
referring  to  buttons  for  which  the  shank  and 
button  are  fashioned  out  of  the  same  piece  of 
material  such  that  they  are  one.  Usually  this  is 
the  result  of  a  molding  process  and  is  typical  of 
buttons  made  in  the  2nd  half  of  the  19th  century 
(Luscomb  1967:  175).  In  terms  of  shape,  all  of  the 
two-  and  four-hole  porcelain  buttons  discussed 
below  are  dish-shaped  unless  otherwise 
indicated. 


Artifactual   Summary 

Of  the  142  buttons  and  studs  excavated  from 
the  backlots  in  Lowell,  50  came  from  behind  the 
supervisors'  tenement  (Operation  A)  and  79 
from  behind  the  boardinghouse  (Operation  B 
and  Trench  #2).  In  addition,  11  buttons  and 
studs  came  out  of  Trench  #1  and  just  2  out  of 
Trench  #3  (test  units  from  the  first  phase  of 
excavations;  see  Beaudry  and  Mrozowski  1987a). 
In  Operation  A,  32  (64%)  of  the  buttons  and  studs 
were  found  within  designated  features,  5  (10%) 
occurred  within  the  tenement  structure,  and  13 
(26%)  were  recovered  from  open  yard  areas.  By 
contrast,  56  (71%)  of  the  buttons  and  studs 
recovered  from  Operation  B  and  Trench  #2  were 
found  in  open  yard  spaces.  Following  is  a 
detailed  discussion  of  the  button/stud 
assemblage  by  provenience,  first  in  Operation  A 
and  then  in  Operation  B  (which  includes  the 
data  from  Trench  #2). 


Operation  A 

In  Operation  A,  the  largest  concentration  of 
buttons  was  found  in  Feature  27  which  was 
identified  as  a  planting  hole  just  to  the  north  of 
the  cellar  steps.  A  total  of  9  buttons  was  found 
here,  7  of  which  are  of  the  plain  white  porcelain 
variety  with  four  holes  and  ranging  in  size  from 
1.1  to  1.4  cm.  Four  of  these  buttons  are  almost 
identical  and  appear  to  have  been  part  of  a  set, 
perhaps  coming  from  a  single  item  of  clothing. 
Also  in  this  feature  were  a  tiny  shell  button  (D  = 


.8  cm)  with  minute  holes  clearly  meant  for  very 
light  fabrics  (possibly  infant  clothing),  and  a 
metal  shank-type  button  with  an  eagle  motif. 
The  metal  button  is  severely  corroded  and  the 
shank,  which  was  probably  a  loop,  has  snapped 
off.  Nonetheless,  the  motif  is  intact  enough  to 
see  that  it  is  typical  of  the  post-revolution 
"Federal"  army  buttons  discussed  by  Calver  and 
Bolton  (1950:  143) — the  button  depicts  a  spread- 
eagle  with  a  banner  arching  over  its  head. 
Unfortunately,  the  lettering  on  the  banner  is 
illegible,  but  the  banner  is  longer  than  those 
pictured  by  Calver  and  Bolton,  and  could 
probably  have  fit  a  longer  word  than  "Federal." 
Although  the  design  of  the  button — a  one-piece 
flat  disc  with  an  attached  shank — is  typical  of 
18th-century  buttons  (Hughes  and  Lester  1981: 
221),  the  eagle  motif  (without  the  banner) 
persisted  throughout  the  19th  century  (MW 
1895: 85;  SR  1897: 320). 

Feature  45,  a  privy,  contained  7  buttons,  all 
found  in  level  B.  Four  of  these  are  plain  white 
porcelain  four-hole  buttons,  1  is  a  brown-bodied 
porcelain  button  with  two  holes  in  the  mound 
style  (Figures  8-6c,  8-7),  and  another  porcelain 
button  is  hemispherical  in  shape,  has  a  corroded 
iron  shank,  and  appears  to  have  been  a  shoe 
button.  The  last  specimen  from  Feature  45  is  an 
undiagnostic  alloy  button  with  a  corroded  iron 
shank. 

Six  buttons  came  out  of  the  cellar  (Feature  25), 
2  from  level  C  and  4  from  level  D.  There  were  2 
four-hole  shell  buttons  in  the  cellar,  1  each  in 
levels  C  and  D.  Level  C  contained,  in  addition,  1 
four-hole  white  porcelain  button  in  the  inkwell 
shape  and  banded  red  (Figures  8-6d,  8-8).  Level 
D  contained  2  plain  four-hole  buttons  and  1  two- 
hole,  tan  mound  button. 

Feature  44,  a  dark  soil  stain  connected  to  the 
drain  box  in  the  north  portion  of  the  yard, 
contained  2  buttons  of  the  plain  white  four-hole 
variety,  1  each  in  levels  A  and  C,  and  1  white 
porcelain  stud  fragment  in  level  A.  Two  buttons 
were  found  in  Feature  46  which  was  identified  as 
a  bottle  dump.  One  of  these  is  of  the  ubiquitious 
four-hole  white  porcelain  variety  while  the  other 
is  an  orange  faceted-glass  specimen  with  a 
drilled  self  shank  (Figure  8-9b).  This  shape  was 
available  from  at  least  the  1890s  as  it  appears  in 
the  1895  Montgomery  Ward  catalog  in  jet  (MW 
1895:  84;  Figure  8-4). 

Other  features  in  Operation  A  yielded  just  one 
button  or  stud  each.  A  single  plain  white  four- 
hole  button  was  found  in  the  ell  foundation  wall 
(Feature  33)  as  well  as  in  Feature  24  (an 
unidentified  soil  stain).  The  top  level  of  the  brick 
drain  box  (Feature  37)  contained  a  plain  white 
porcelain  stud,  and  the  cellar  stairs  (Feature  23) 


Personal  Effects   149 


A. 


n 


B. 


E. 


10      20 


SCALE  1:1 


Figure  8-6.  Formal  and  decorative  typology  used  throughout  this  analysis  to  facilitate 
description  of  white  porcelain  buttons.  Buttons  can  be  described  both  in  terms  of 
shape:  A)  dish;  B)  saucer;  C)  mound;  D)  inkwell,  and  decorative  elements:  E)  hobnail 
border;  F)  pie-crust  border.  The  dish  is  the  most  common  and  the  least  distinctive 
shape  as  the  size,  slope,  and  shape  of  the  rim  is  variable.  In  a  sense,  this  is  a  "catch-all" 
designation  for  those  buttons  that  do  not  fit  into  the  other,  more  distinctive,  categories. 
In  addition,  there  is  a  banded  variety  in  which  the  edge  is  painted  in  a  solid  color. 
Banding  occurs  most  frequently  on  inkwell  shaped  buttons,  but  can  also  be  found  on 
dishes,  hobnails,  and  pie-crusts.  (Drawing  by  Leslie  A.  Mead.) 


150   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  8-7.         Two-hole  porcelain  buttons.  Buttons  in  top  row  and  at  either  end  of  center 
row  are  mound-shaped  (scale  in  cm).  (Photographby  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Figure  8-8.         Four-hole  porcelain  buttons.  Buttons  in  top  row  are  inkwell-shaped  with 

banded  decoration.  The  buttons  in  the  middle  row  are  dish-shaped  with  pie- 
crust borders.  The  first  button  in  the  bottom  row  is  dish-shaped  with  a 
hobnail  border  and  the  rest  have  pie-crust  borders  (scale  in  cm). 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


Personal   Effects   151 


Figure  8-9.         Miscellaneous  buttons:   A)  glass  hemispherical  button  with  probable  loop 
shank  from  Feature  6  behind  the  boardinghouse;  B)  faceted  orange  glass 
self-shank  button  from  Feature  46  behind  the  tenement;  and  C)  four-hole 
wood  button  from  level  1  in  Operation  B  (scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


152   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


A. 


B. 


D. 


E. 


0       10      20 


SCALE  1 :1 


Figure  8-10.  Black  glass  buttons.  A)  Pressed  glass  button  with  swirl  design  and  polished 
facets  running  down  the  center  recovered  from  level  1  of  Feature  43  in  Operation  A.  B) 
One  of  two  identical  pressed  glass  buttons  found  in  level  1  of  Operation  B.  Two-thirds  of 
the  surface  is  faceted  and  the  other  third  is  fashioned  as  a  smiling  quarter-moon  face. 
C)  A  pressed  black  glass  button  with  polished  facets  and  an  applied  silver  luster  which 
makes  the  button  resemble  steel.  This  button  was  recovered  from  level  1  in  the  open 
yard  area  of  Operation  B.  D)  A  large  faceted  pressed  glass  button  probably  meant  for 
an  overcoat,  found  in  level  2  of  the  boardinghouse  yard.  E)  A  pressed  glass  button  with  a 
geometric  design  and  unpolished  facets  uncovered  in  level  4  of  Trench  #1.  (Drawing  by 
Leslie  A.  Mead.) 


10 


20 

1 


SCALE  1 :1 


Figure  8-11.  Metal  alloy  self-shank  button  excavated  from  level  1  of  the  privy  in 
Operation  B  (Feature  61).  (Drawing  by  Leslie  A.  Mead.) 


Personal  Effects   153 


yielded  a  corroded  lapel  button  or  stud  in  level  F. 
The  top  level  of  the  well  (Feature  43)  contained  a 
highly  decorative  pressed  black  glass  button 
with  a  self  shank  (Figure  8-10a)  that  was 
probably  manufactured  after  1870  (Hughes  and 
Lester  1981: 83, 89),  and  is  very  similar  to  the  "jet" 
buttons  advertized  in  the  1890s  (Figure  8-4).  The 
button  measures  1.3  cm  in  diameter  and  has  a 
line  of  polished  facets  running  in  a  curved  line 
down  the  center  with  a  braided  border. 

Of  the  13  buttons  and  studs  that  were  found  in 
the  open  yard  areas  of  Operation  A,  8  were 
recovered  from  level  1,  2  from  level  2,  and  3  from 
level  3.  There  were  2  studs  in  level  1,  both  plain 
white  porcelain.  The  remaining  11  items  from 
the  3  levels  are  all  four-hole  white  porcelain 
buttons,  some  fragmentary.  One  of  these,  from 
level  1,  has  a  pie  crust  edge  decoration  (Figures 
8-6f,  8-8). 

Five  buttons  were  found  within  the  limits  of 
the  tenement  foundation,  2  in  the  cellar  area 
and  3  in  the  ell.  Both  buttons  in  the  cellar  came 
out  of  level  1;  one  of  them  is  a  plain  four-hole 
porcelain  button  and  the  other  is  a  badly 
deteriorated  self-shank  (really  just  a  hole  drilled 
laterally  through  the  underside  of  the  button) 
shell  button  measuring  2.3  cm  in  diameter.  Of 
the  3  buttons  in  the  ell,  2  came  out  of  the  top 
level  and  the  remaining  one  from  level  2.  Level  1 
contained  a  corroded  metal  disk  measuring  1.3 
cm  with  no  shank  that  is  probably  a  button,  and 
a  two-hole  mound-shaped  porcelain  button  with 
a  red  band.  Level  2  yielded  part  of  a  glass 
composite  button  with  a  molded  clover  motif 
painted  green  on  the  underside.  This  button 
may  have  at  one  time  had  a  metal  backing  with  a 
shank  attached  to  it. 


Operation   B 

The  pattern  in  Operation  B  and  Trench  #2  is 
very  different  as  only  10  buttons  and  2  studs 
came  out  of  features.  Feature  61,  the  privy, 
yielded  4  porcelain  four-hole  buttons  (1  of  which 
is  black)  and  1  heavily  corroded  metal  stud  in 
level  1.  The  well  uncovered  in  Trench  #2 
(Feature  2)  contained  a  single  white  porcelain 
four-hole  button  and  a  plain  white  porcelain  stud 
in  levels  9c  and  b  respectively.  A  single  metal 
button  was  found  in  level  8a  of  Feature  3,  a  brick 
drain  box.  The  button  is  copper  alloy  (or  possibly 
brass)  with  a  rather  large  self  shank  (Figure  8- 
11).  There  is  no  decoration  on  the  front,  and  the 
button  resembles  some  of  the  18th-century 
specimens  documented  by  Stone  at 
Michilimackinac  (1974:  48-51).  It  could  perhaps 
be  classified  with  Olsen's  type  A  (1963:  553) 
inasmuch  as  it  appears  to  have  been  cast  in  one 


Figure  8-12.   Decorative  clothing  stud,  possibly 
half  of  a  cufflink,  set  with  a  blue  stone,  uncovered 
in  level  3  of  Trench  #1  (scale  in  cm). 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


piece,  shank  and  all.  Oisen  notes  that  early 
buttons  "as  a  rule  ...  were  plain,  of  cast  brass 
pewter,  or  whitemetal  with  wedge-shaped  cast 
shanks"  (Olsen  1963:  552).  The  button  excavated 
from  Lowell  fits  this  description,  and  its 
appearance  in  the  top  level  of  the  privy  suggests 
that  it  was  not  found  in  its  primary  depositional 
context. 

Feature  6  (a  sewer  pipe  trench)  yielded  2  white 
porcelain  buttons,  1  with  four  holes  and  the  other 
saucer-shaped  with  two  holes,  and  a  clear  glass 
hemispherical  button  decorated  with  raised 
wavy  lines  radiating  out  from  a  knobbed  pole 
(Figure  8-9a).  The  button  has  a  hole  in  the  back 
which  retains  traces  of  metal  corrosion  and 
probably  once  housed  a  loop  shank.  The  surface 
finish  has  a  frosted  appearance  which  could 
have  been  obtained  through  a  process  of 
treating  the  finished  button  with  acid  which 
would  take  away  the  natural  sheen  of  the  glass 
(Luscomb  1967:  82).  One  plain  four-hole  button 
was  recovered  from  level  11  of  this  feature. 

A  total  of  9  buttons  and  2  studs  were  found 
within  the  limits  of  the  boardinghouse  structure, 
all  in  level  1.  Three  buttons,  2  white  porcelain 
and  1  black  glass,  came  out  of  the  cellar  area. 
The  glass  button  is  faceted  over  two-thirds  of  its 
surface,  and  the  remaining  third  is  occupied  by  a 
crescent-moon  face  (Figure  8-1  Ob).  The  shank, 
although  completely  corroded,  has  left  a 
greenish  impression  on  the  back,  revealing  it  to 
have  been  a  metal  loop  shank,  probably 
mounted  on  a  plate  that  was  slightly  inset.  An 
identical  button  was  found  in  level  1  out  in  the 
middle  of  the  yard.    Although  the  man-in-the- 


154   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


moon  motif  was  popular  on  buttons  throughout 
the  19th  century  (Hughes  and  Lester  1981:  399), 
the  fact  that  these  are  black  glass  means  they 
probably  date  to  the  end  of  the  century. 

The  other  6  buttons  and  the  2  studs  found 
within  the  boardinghouse  were  recovered  from 
the  ell.  The  studs  are  porcelain  and  glass  (1  of 
each),  2  of  the  buttons  are  plain  four-hole 
porcelains,  2  are  four-hole  saucer-shaped 
porcelains,  1  is  a  two-hole  porcelain,  and  the  last 
one  is  brown  glass. 

The  remaining  56  buttons  and  studs  from 
Operation  B  and  Trench  #2  were  found  in  open 
yard  areas.  One  plain  porcelain  button  and  1 
stud  were  recovered  from  the  surface.  Level  1 
yielded  21  white  four-hole  porcelain  buttons  (3 
saucer-shaped,  1  with  a  pie  crust  border,  1  with  a 
hobnail  border  [Figures  8-6e,  8-8),  and  1  with  a 
brown  band).  In  addition,  there  were  3  two-hole 
porcelains,  1  four-hole  black  porcelain,  3 
undiagnostic  flat  metal  buttons,  1  wood,  4  glass, 
and  1  plastic  button  as  well  as  2  white  porcelain 
studs  and  2  lever-top  collar  studs.  The  wood 
button  is  a  flat  four-hole  type  (Figure  8-9c)  that 
could  reasonably  have  been  manufactured  any 
time  in  the  last  few  centuries.  The  glass  buttons 
comprise  1  black  hemispherical  sew-through 
with  two  holes  (in  two  pieces,  but  mended  to 
one),  the  matching  man-in-the-moon  button 
discussed  above,  and  a  pressed  black  glass 
button  with  polished  facets,  a  silver  luster  finish, 
and  a  missing  metal  shank  that  was  probably  a 
loop  in  an  inset  plate  (Figure  8-10c).  The  plastic 
button  is  2.7  cm  in  diameter  and  has  an  attached 
plastic  loop  shank.  It  is  surface-dyed  pink,  but  is 
fading  from  the  base  up.  The  body  of  the  button 
is  a  creamy  white,  and  although  the  material 
melts  when  heat  is  applied,  it  does  not  release  a 
detectable  odor.  In  accordance  with  the  above 
characteristics,  the  button  has  been  tentatively 
identified  as  casein  and  was  therefore 
manufactured  some  time  after  1890. 

Level  2  contained  6  white  porcelain  four-hole 
buttons,  2  with  a  pie  crust  border.  In  addition, 
there  was  1  large  black  glass  button  (D  =  3.1  cm) 
with  a  faceted  surface  and  a  metal  loop-shank 
typical  of  those  popular  at  the  end  of  the  19th 
century  (Hughes  and  Lester  1981:  84,  85;  Figure 
8-10d).  A  lever-top  collar  stud  was  also  found  in 
this  level.  Just  one  button  was  excavated  from 
level  3  in  the  open  yard  and  it  is  a  plain  porcelain 
one.  Level  5  in  Trench  #2,  however,  yielded  1 
metal  and  1  shell  button  (neither  remarkable),  2 
white  four-hole  porcelain  buttons,  1  porcelain 
stud  and  1  lever-top  collar  stud.  Finally,  1  plain 
white  porcelain  button  with  four  holes  was  found 
in  level  10  of  Trench  #2. 


Beads  and  Jewelry 

A  total  of  17  objects  were  classified  as  beads 
and  18  as  jewelry.  The  two  categories  will  be 
discussed  together  because  the  distinction 
between  them  is  often  very  unclear.  Beads,  if 
not  sewn  onto  clothing,  were  usually  elements  in 
pieces  of  jewelry  in  the  19th  century  (e.g.,  MW 
1895:  84).  In  any  case,  both  are  decorative  items. 
The  beads  were  classified  by  material  and  dated 
accordingly.  There  are  9  glass  beads  or  bead 
fragments,  1  ivory  bead,  5  porcelain  beads,  and  2 
of  unidentified  material.  The  porcelain  beads 
have  been  given  a  beginning  manufacture  date 
of  1840  in  agreement  with  the  date  of 
manufacture  established  for  porcelain  buttons. 
None  of  the  other  materials  can  be  dated  with 
any  confidence. 

The  jewelry  items  were  classified  only  by 
object  and  not  broken  down  into  types.  None  of 
the  materials  could  be  dated  with  any 
confidence,  and  any  temporal  discussion  is 
based  entirely  on  stylistic  considerations.  All  of 
the  pieces  of  jewelry  except  for  2  gold  or  gold- 
plated  rings  are  costume  jewelry  made  from 
non-precious  materials.  It  is  difficult  to  discuss 
style  popularity  of  jewelry  because  most  works 
on  jewelry  deal  with  high-fashion  designs  using 
precious  metals  and  stones.  The  only  source  we 
have  for  everyday  or  costume  jewelry  styles  is 
the  mail-order  catalogs.  Many  of  the  designs  of 
the  excavated  jewelry  are  consistent  with  those 
popular  at  the  end  of  the  19th  century  as 
pictured  in  the  mail-order  catalogs  (MW  1895: 
166-175;  SR  1897:  416^429).  Particularly  striking 
are  the  round  wreath-like  brooches  and 
pendants  and  the  linear  bar  pins  set  with  stones. 


Artifactual   Summary 

In  Operation  A,  12  of  the  13  beads  and  6  of  the 
11  pieces  of  jewelry  came  out  of  features.  Three 
jewelry  items  were  found  within  the  limits  of  the 
tenement  structure,  and  just  1  bead  and  2  pieces 
of  jewelry  were  found  out  in  the  yard  areas.  By 
contrast,  a  total  of  only  4  beads  were  uncovered 
in  Operation  B — 1  within  a  feature  and  3  in  the 
open  yard — as  well  as  just  4  pieces  of  jewelry,  3  of 
which  were  out  in  the  yard  area  and  1  within  the 
limits  of  the  boardinghouse  foundation.  The  2 
gold  or  gold-plated  rings  mentioned  above  were 
recovered  from  Trench  #3,  levels  3  and  4.  The 
ring  from  level  3  was  designed  to  hold  a 
gemstone  and  has  6  prongs  for  that  purpose. 
The  band  is  wide  at  the  top,  narrowing  toward 
the  bottom,  with  incised  geometric  designs  on 
either  side  of  the  stone  area.  The  ring  recovered 
from  level  4  is  a  plain  gold  wedding  band 


Lj^'^a 

cm  1 

Personal   Effects   155 


Figure  8-13.  Celluloid  pin-back  button  manufactured  after  1893.  The  legend  reads 
"KISS  ME  [illegible]  I'M  STERILIZED"  and  may  be  related  to  the  influenza  epidemic  of 
1918.  The  button  was  found  in  level  B  of  the  privy  in  Operation  A.  (Photograph  by 
Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


approximately  .5  cm  wide  and  1.2  cm  in 
diameter.  Also  excavated  from  level  3  of  Trench 
#3  was  an  oval  decorative  clothing  stud  or 
cufflink  set  with  a  light  blue  stone  (Figure  8-12). 


Operation  A 

The  feature  with  the  greatest  number  of  beads 
and  jewelry  in  Operation  A  was  the  cellar 
(Feature  25).  Level  D  yielded  a  natural  colored 
ivory  bead  and  a  light  blue  glass  bead  (in  three 
pieces)  as  well  as  a  long  rhinestone  pin 
fashioned  in  a  floral  motif  and  another, 
unidentified,  item  of  jewelry.  Level  B  of  Feature 
45,  the  privy,  yielded  a  single  tiny  orange  glass 
bead  (D  =  .5  cm)  as  well  as  an  interesting 
celluloid  pin  in  two  pieces.  The  pin  depicts  a 
man  and  a  woman  kissing  and  reads  "KISS  ME 
[illegible]  I'M  STERILIZED."  (Figure  8-13).  The 
drawing  is  rendered  with  very  simple  lines  and 
the  effect  is  cartoonish.  The  costumes  are 
consistent  with  those  of  the  Edwardian  era  in  the 
early  20th  century  inasmuch  as  the  woman  has 
full  hair  softly  styled  on  top  of  her  head  (de 
Courtais  1973:  140),  and  the  man  has  a  very  high, 
stiff  collar  (Wilcox  1969:  82).  In  addition,  there  is 
an  object  protruding  from  the  woman's  right 
shoulder  which  may  be  a  hypodermic  needle. 
One  possible  interpretation  of  the  button  that 
was  suggested  by  Lauren  Cook  is  that  it  refers  to 
the  flu  epidemic  of  1918. 

Several  lines  of  evidence  render  this 
hypothesis  tenable.  1)  The  context  in  which  the 
pin  was  found  (Feature  45,  level  B)  has  been 
firmly  dated  to  after  1891  based  on  the  pipe  stem 
data  (Cook,  this  volume).  2)  The  pin,  though 


somewhat  deteriorated,  appears  to  be  a  pin- 
back  (Luscomb  1967:  152),  or  celluloid  (Fischer 
1988:  145)  button  of  the  type  first  patented  in 
1893  by  Amanda  M.  Longee.  Longee's  design 
was  for  a  printed  textile  base  mounted  on  a 
metal  backing  or  rim  with  a  pin  attachment  and 
covered  with  a  thin  sheet  of  transparent 
celluloid.  In  1896  the  Whitehead  and  Hoag 
Company  acquired  the  patent  for  the  celluloid 
button  with  the  print  on  paper — the  same  form 
used  for  modern  campaign  buttons  (Fischer 
1988:  144).  What  remains  of  the  "KISS  ME..."  pin 
is  just  the  celluloid  film  with  the  drawing 
imprinted  on  the  back.  The  edges  are  turned 
over  and  crimped,  and  there  are  some  traces  of 
corroded  metal  around  the  inside  rim 
suggesting  that  there  was  a  metal  ring 
supporting  the  celluloid.  The  paper  or  fabric  on 
which  the  drawing  was  originally  imprinted  is 
completely  gone.  3)  The  flu  epidemic  was  a 
major  concern  in  Massachusetts  in  1918.  Boston 
was  the  site  of  the  first  outbreak  of  Spanish 
influenza  in  the  New  World  in  the  late  summer 
of  1918  (Crosby  1976:  39).  The  disease  was  first 
noted  on  August  27  among  the  naval  forces  at 
Commonwealth  Pier  and  spread  to  the  civilian 
population  of  Boston  by  September  (Crosby 
1976:  39-40).  By  the  end  of  September,  Lowell 
was  also  experiencing  the  effects  of  the 
epidemic,  having  lost  32  people  to  influenza  and 
pneumonia.  During  the  week  of  October  6-12, 
1918,  a  high  of  141  influenza-related  deaths  were 
reported  in  Lowell  (Crosby  1976:  60). 
Furthermore,  the  disease  tended  to  kill  people  in 
the  prime  of  life,  most  flu  deaths  occurring  in  the 
21-29  year-old  age  range  (Crosby  1976:  21)— the 


156   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


"kissing"  years,  perhaps.  4)  Vaccines,  however 
ineffectual,  were  available  very  soon  after  the 
initial  outbreak  of  influenza.  In  fact,  one  of  the 
earliest  ("and  probably  best  publicized") 
vaccines  was  developed  near  Boston  at  the  Tufts 
Medical  Center  (Crosby  1976:  100).  In 
conclusion,  the  post-1891  archeological  context 
in  which  the  button  was  found,  the  1893  patent- 
date  for  celluloid  buttons,  the  omnipresence  of 
Spanish  influzenza  in  Lowell  in  1918,  and  the 
availability  of  a  "vaccine"  are  all  lines  of 
evidence  that  support  (or  at  least  do  not 
contradict)  the  interpretation  of  the  "KISS  ME  ... 
I'M  STERILIZED"  button  as  connected  to  the 
flu  epidemic  of  1918.  If  this  interpretation  is 
correct,  then  Level  B  of  Feature  45  must  have 
been  deposited  in  1918  or  later.  In  any  event,  it 
could  not  have  been  deposited  before  1893  when 
the  celluloid  button  was  first  patented. 

Another  celluloid  button  was  found  in  Feature 
23  (level  B),  the  entryway  to  the  cellar.  Although 
the  structure  of  the  pin  is  intact,  the  design  is 
quite  damaged  and  difficult  to  decipher.  It 
reads  "KEEP  SMILING"  on  two  lines  at  the  top, 
"QUICK  [illegible)"  towards  the  bottom,  and 
'TAPIOCA"  curving  along  the  bottom  edge. 
This  is  probably  a  promotional  button  for  a 
brand  of  tapioca,  but  the  manufacturer  has  not 
been  identified.  In  any  case,  its  presence  in  level 
B  of  Feature  23  dates  that  deposit  to  1893  or 
later. 

A  brick  drain  box  (Feature  37)  yielded  3  beads 
in  level  B,  one  a  translucent  milky  white  sphere 
that  was  slightly  squashed  and  one  a  small 
oblong  light  blue  bead — both  are  made  of  glass. 
The  other  bead  is  a  dark  blue  round  one, 
probably  also  glass.  Feature  44,  a  dark  soil  stain 
leading  out  from  the  drain  box,  contained  a  dark 
blue  clothing  bead  with  the  remains  of  an  iron 
shank  in  level  A,  and  2  small,  round  sew-through 
beads  in  level  B — one  light  orange  glass  and  one 
light  blue  porcelain.  One  other  bead  was  found 
in  level  A  of  the  ell  foundation  (Feature  33),  a 
round  white  sew-through  made  of  glass.  Finally, 
Feature  38,  where  there  was  heavy  brick  rubble, 
yielded  a  round  brooch  with  an  elaborate  copper 
alloy  border  functioning  as  a  framing  device 
(Figure  8-14).  Within  the  frame  are  the 
remnants  of  a  photograph  (paper  fiber  and 
photographic  emulsion  are  evident  although  the 
image  is  not  visible)  mounted  on  a  metal 
backing.  The  underside  of  the  piece  is  heavily 
corroded,  but  the  remains  of  a  pin  clasp  are 
obvious. 

Three  items  of  jewelry  were  found  within  the 
bounds  of  the  tenement  cellar  foundation.  In 
level  1  there  was  a  tiny  blue  clothing  stud  (D  =  .5 
cm)  with  traces  of  a  metal  shank.     Level  2 


contained  a  brooch  similar  to  the  one  found  in 
Feature  38  and  an  unidentified  object.  The 
brooch  is  a  circular  piece  of  glass  framed  by  a 
braided  copper  alloy  border  measuring  3  cm  in 
diameter  (Figure  8-14).  The  back  of  the  border 
has  six  flat  metal  prongs  designed  to  hold 
something  against  the  glass.  There  is  a  dense 
white  substance  adhering  to  the  back  of  the 
glass,  some  of  which  is  underneath  the  prongs. 
Under  microscopic  examination,  the  substance 
appears  to  be  fibrous,  and  may  be  paper.  This 
could  be  the  remains  of  a  photograph,  but  since 
no  photographic  emulsion  is  in  evidence,  it 
could  alternatively  be  the  remains  of  a  painting 
or  drawing.  The  remnants  of  two  ends  of  a  pin 
clasp  are  visible  on  the  back  of  the  object — 
hence  its  identification  as  a  brooch.  The 
unidentified  object  is  also  a  circular  piece  of 
glass,  but  with  a  plain,  possibly  graphite  or 
rubber  frame.  This  may,  in  fact,  not  be  a  piece  of 
jewelry,  but  there  is  a  trace  of  some  sort  of 
attachment  at  one  point  along  the  edge 
suggesting  that  it  could  have  been  part  of  a 
pendant. 

The  only  items  found  out  in  the  yard  area  of 
Operation  A  were  the  following:  a  copper  alloy 
straight  decorative  pin  (L  =  2.8  cm)  possibly 
painted  black  (in  level  2);  a  dark  blue  sew- 
through  porcelain  bead  (also  in  level  2);  and  an 
unidentified  jewelry  fragment  fashioned  in  a 
flower  motif  (in  level  3).  The  pin  is  probably  a 
soft  collar  pin  much  like  the  ones  advertized  in 
the  1922  Montgomery  Ward  catalog  (MW  1922: 
352).  If  this  is  a  correct  identification  of  the 
object,  then  it  may  date  level  2  of  the  tenement 
yard  to  after  1908.  Soft  collars  became  available 
sometime  between  1908  and  1922  as  they  are  not 
listed  in  the  Sears  Roebuck  catalog  of  1908  (SR 
1908:  973)  nor  are  they  listed  in  the  catalogs  of 
the  1890s  (MW  1895:  92;  SR  1897:  219). 


Operation   B 

Only  4  beads  and  4  items  of  jewelry  were 
found  behind  the  boardinghouse  in  Operation 
B.  The  privy  (Feature  61)  contained  just  1  oblong 
bead  that  is  white  porcelain,  in  level  2.  The  3 
other  beads  came  from  the  open  yard  area.  All 
are  of  the  sew-through  variety  and  spherical;  2  of 
them  are  made  of  porcelain  and  are  less  than  1 
cm  in  diameter — 1  is  opaque  green  and  the 
other  is  dark  blue  or  black.  The  other  bead  is 
more  interesting  as  it  is  larger  than  most  of  the 
others  (D  =  1.8  cm),  and  is  light  green  with  what 
appears  to  be  a  yellow  trailed  slip  decoration 
(except  that  the  bead  is  glass).  Only  half  of  the 
bead  remains,  but  it  must  have  been  the 
centerpiece  of  a  string  of  beads.    The  jewelry 


Personal  Effects  157 


Figure  8-14.  Two  brooches  that  probably  framed  photographs  or  miniatures.  A) 
Brooch  with  copper  alloy  frame  and  braided  border  found  in  level  2  behind  the 
tenement.  A  dense  white  substance  that  may  be  paper  adheres  to  the  back  of  the  glass. 
B)  Brooch  with  copper  alloy  frame  with  elaborate  border  found  in  level  1  of  Feature  38, 
also  behind  the  tenement.  Remnants  of  paper  fibers  and  Photographgraphic  emulsion 
are  evident  within  the  frame,  suggesting  that  a  photograph  was  mounted  on  this  brooch 
(scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


*a«W*X*)^'*t     "'  '*&•»***». 


Figure  8-15.  Top  and  side  view  of  rhinestone  pin  uncovered  within  the  ell  in  level  1  of 
the  boardinghouse  excavation  (scale  in  cm).  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


158   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


from  Operation  B  was  all  found  in  level  1  and 
consists  of  2  costume  jewels  (a  "diamond"  and 
an  "emerald")  made  of  glass,  1  small  white 
porcelain  object  that  could  have  been  a  clothing 
stud,  and  a  copper  alloy  linear  rhinestone  pin 
(Figure  8-15)  measuring  6.8  cm.  The  pin  was  set 
with  nine  brilliants  of  varying  sizes,  the  largest  in 
the  center  and  the  smallest  at  the  ends.  This  was 
probably  a  lace  pin  much  like  those  advertized 
in  the  Montgomery  Ward  catalog  of  1895  (MW 
1895:  174).  The  pin  was  found  within  the  ell 
whereas  the  other  objects  were  found  out  in  the 
yard  area. 


Combs  and  Hair  Ornaments 

A  variety  of  combs  and  hair  ornaments  were 
found  during  the  excavations  at  Lowell.  These 
include  decorative  combs  (side  and  back), 
straight  combs  and  fine-tooth  combs  used  in 
grooming  (Figure  8-16),  hair  pins,  and  barrettes. 
A  total  of  43  items  were  included  in  this  category, 
but  it  must  be  kept  in  mind  that  19  of  these  are 
single  teeth.  The  items  in  this  category  were 
cataloged  by  material;  24  of  them  are  plastic,  13 
rubber,  3  metal,  2  tortoise  shell,  and  1  possibly 
horn. 

Before  the  1920s  when  shorter  hair  styles  came 
into  vogue,  hair  combs  or  other  ornaments  were 
worn  by  most  women  to  control  their  hair 
(Haertig  1983:  28,  73).  Early  combs  were  made 
from  natural  materials  such  as  tortoise  shell, 
horn,  or  ivory.  The  process  of  vulcanization, 
whereby  rubber  was  hardened,  was  discovered 
in  1839  and  subsequently  used  in  the 
manufacture  of  such  objects  as  buttons  and 
combs  (Hughes  and  Lester  1981:  48;  Haertig 
1983:  62).  The  commercial  production  of 
celluloid  in  1869  had  an  even  greater  impact  on 
the  comb  industry,  however,  as  plastic  materials 
could  be  made  to  resemble  the  much  more 
expensive  tortoise  shell.  Hard  rubber,  by 
contrast,  has  a  dull  black  finish  and  is  suited 
more  to  utilitarian  than  decorative  items,  and  is 
accordingly  found  more  often  in  the  form  of 
straight  combs  and  fine-tooth  combs  (i.e.,  combs 
with  thin  teeth  along  both  edges  set  very  close 
together). 

Combs  were  both  utilitarian  and  decorative. 
In  the  1860s  elaborate  combs  studded  with 
jewels  were  popular  and  in  keeping  with  the  style 
of  attaching  cascades  of  false  hair  to  a  chignon 
at  the  back  of  the  neck  (Corson  1971:  477-484;  de 
Courtais  1973:  124).  The  back  combs  were  used 
as  fasteners,  and  often  had  high,  decorative 
bridges.  The  1870s  and  1880s  saw  a  decline  in 
the  popularity  of  the  chignon  and  false  hair  in 
general,  and  the  trend  was  towards  sweeping  the 


hair  up  off  the  neck  and  holding  it  with  a  comb 
or  hair  pins  (Corson  1971:  488;  de  Courtais  1973: 
124).  In  the  last  decade  of  the  19th  century  the 
emphasis  was  on  piling  the  hair  on  the  top  of  the 
head  as  opposed  to  at  the  back  (Corson  1971: 
494;  de  Courtais  1973:  134).  Fancy  back  combs 
were  still  popular,  as  can  be  seen  in  the  mail- 
order catalogs  of  the  1890s  (SR  1897:  326,  435; 
MW  1895: 182-183),  but  by  the  20th  century  back 
combs  were  lower  and  became  more  similar  to 
side  combs  (SR  1908:  1002;  MW  1922:  349;  SR 
1936:  103;  Haertig  1983:  49).  Barrettes  and  hair 
ornaments  decorated  with  inset  brilliants  seem 
to  have  become  popular  in  the  early  20th 
century  (SR  1908:  1002;  MW  1922:  349),  while  hair 
pins  occur  throughout.  Straight  combs  and  fine- 
tooth  combs  stand  separate  from  the  other  items 
in  this  category  inasmuch  as  they  are  purely 
utilitarian  and  used  for  grooming,  rather  than 
being  worn  in  the  hair  for  decorative  purposes. 
As  such,  they  do  not  change  stylistically  over 
time  very  much  and  are  therefore  less 
diagnostic.  Both  kinds  of  combs  appear  in  the 
mail-order  catalogs  of  the  1890s  and  the  early 
20th  century  (SR  1897:  326;  MW  1895:  105-106; 
SR  1908: 1003;  MW  1922:  391). 


Artifactual    Summary 

A  total  of  17  combs  and  hair  ornaments  were 
recovered  from  Operation  A.  Twelve  of  these 
were  from  within  features,  4  out  in  the  open  yard, 
and  just  1  plastic  tooth  from  inside  the  tenement 
foundation.  In  Operation  B,  24  combs  and  hair 
ornaments  were  uncovered — 11  from  features, 
12  from  the  yard  area,  and  again  just  1  from  the 
boardinghouse  area.  In  addition,  a  plastic 
hairpin  fragment  was  found  in  Trench  #1,  level  3, 
and  a  tooth  from  a  hard  rubber  comb  in  level  4. 


Operation  A 

In  Operation  A,  the  privy  (Feature  45)  yielded 
the  greatest  number  of  combs  and  hair 
ornaments  from  its  level  B.  There  was  1  almost 
complete  plastic  side  comb  measuring  about  10 
cm  as  well  as  a  fragment  of  another  plastic  side 
comb  and  a  single  tooth.  In  addition,  a  plastic 
hair  pin  fragment  was  found  as  well  as  the  top 
portion,  without  any  teeth,  of  what  seems  to  be  a 
tortoise  shell  side  comb. 

The  dark  soil  stain  emanating  from  the  drain 
box  (Feature  44)  contained  3  comb  teeth,  a 
rubber  one  and  a  plastic  one  in  level  B  and  a 
metal  one  (possibly  aluminum)  in  level  C  A 
single  plastic  tooth  was  also  excavated  from 
Feature  23,  level  D  (cellar  stairs),  and  one  from 
Feature  37,  level  B  (the  brick  drain  box).  Level  B 


Personal   Effects   159 


jMfltU* 


Hi 


Figure  8-16.  Some  of  the  combs  excavated  fiom  the  backlots  of  the  Boott  Mills' 
boardinghouse/tenement.  A)  Straight  comb,  possibly  made  of  horn.  B)  Hard  rubber 
fine-tooth  comb  (see  also  Figure  8-18b).  C)  Side  comb,  possibly  made  of  tortoise  shell. 
D)  Hard  rubber  side  or  back  comb,  bent  over  so  that  the  bridge  will  cover  the  hair  where 
the  comb  enters  it  (see  also  Figure  8-18a).  E)  Plastic  side  comb  with  decorative  bridge. 
Combs  A-D  were  found  in  level  1  of  the  yard  area  behind  the  boardinghouse.  Comb  E 
was  excavated  from  level  9d  of  the  well  (Feature  2)  in  Trench  #2,  also  behind  the 
boardinghouse.  (Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


160   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 

of  the  cellar  (Feature  25)  also  yielded  a  plastic 
comb  tooth  as  well  as  a  rectangular-shaped 
plastic  barrette  inset  with  three  rows  of  brilliants 
along  the  top,  middle,  and  bottom  cross-pieces. 
This  barrette  is  very  similar  to  one  advertized  in 
the  1922  Montgomery  Ward  catalog  as  a 
"Barrette  of  the  newest  style"  (MW  1922:  349). 
Not  only  do  both  barrettes  have  inset  brilliants, 
but  they  are  of  similar  proportions  and  both 
have  a  twisted  tooth  for  holding  the  hair.  If  this 
style  was  indeed  new  in  1922,  then  level  B  of  the 
cellar  must  date  to  after  that  time. 

In  the  yard  area  of  the  tenement,  fragments  of 
a  rubber  straight  comb  with  a  scalloped  edge 
and  a  plastic  side  comb  were  found  in  level  1. 
The  second  level  contained  just  2  plastic  teeth. 


Operation   B 

The  privy  of  the  boardinghouse  backlot 
(Feature  61)  was  also  the  feature  with  the 
greatest  number  of  combs  and  hair  ornaments. 
Level  1  contained  3  plastic  comb  teeth  (one 
green-colored)  and  one  rubber  fine-tooth  comb 
fragment.  In  level  2  there  was  a  fragment  of  a 
plastic  hair  pin  and  a  very  heavily  corroded 
metal  barrette.  Two  plastic  side-comb 
fragments  came  out  of  level  B  of  Feature  65  (a 
pit  or  planting  hole),  and  1  rubber  tooth  from 
Feature  67.  The  well  (Feature  2)  yielded  a  nearly 
complete  plastic  side  comb  measuring  about 
10.5  cm  (Figure  8-16e)  and  a  fragment  of  a 
rubber  straight  comb  from  level  9d. 

A  hard  rubber  fine-tooth  comb  was  found  in 
level  1  of  the  ell.  Imprinted  on  it  are  the  words 
"I.R.  Comb  Co  Good  year's  Patent  May  6  1851" 
establishing  a  firm  beginning  date  of 
manufacture.  The  comb  is  broken,  but 
assuming  the  imprint  was  originally  centered, 
the  comb  measured  approximately  6.4  cm  long 
and  4  cm  wide.  Out  in  the  yard,  11  items  were 
found  in  level  1.  Included  were  2  plastic  teeth 
and  2  rubber  teeth,  fragments  of  a  plastic  side 
comb  and  a  rubber  straight  comb,  and  part  of 
what  appears  to  be  a  genuine  tortoise  shell  side 
comb  (Figure  8-16c).  In  addition,  there  was  a 
small  undecorated  metal  barrette  (2.8  cm  long), 
oval  in  shape  with  a  cotter  pin  clasp  (Figure  8-17) 
and  the  top  portion  of  a  probable  horn  straight 
comb  (Figure  8-16a).  The  design  of  the  barrette 
is  similar  to  the  barrettes  advertized  in  the  1922 
Montgomery  Ward  catalog  (MW  1922:  349). 
The  identification  of  the  comb  as  horn  is  based 
on  the  fact  that  is  has  a  soft,  leather-like  quality 
and  a  visible  fibrous  texture,  but  when  held  up  to 
the  light  is  transluscent  with  a  mottled,  tortoise 
shell  coloration.  Of  special  note  in  this  level  are 
two  hard  rubber  combs  with  imprints — one  is  a 


Figure  8-17.  Front  and  back  view  of  small  oval 
barrette  with  cotter  pin  clasp  from  level  1  of  the 
boardinghouse  backlot  (scale  in  cm). 
(Photograph  by  Richard  S.  Kanaski.) 


side  or  back  comb  and  the  other  is  a  fine-tooth 
comb.  The  side  or  back  comb  has  a  bent-over 
bridge  designed  to  cover  the  hair  where  the 
comb  enters  it.  A  similar  design  is  pictured  in 
the  1908  Sears  Roebuck  catalog  (SR  1908:  1002) 
and  is  actually  labelled  as  a  barrette:  "Ever  Tidy 
Barrette,  a  clever  invention  for  holding  stray 
back  hairs."  This  description,  coupled  with  the 
fact  that  no  such  design  appears  in  earlier 
catalogs,  may  indicate  that  this  kind  of  comb  (or 
"barrette")  was  new  at  the  beginning  of  the 
century.  The  imprint  on  the  one  excavated  at 
Lowell  reads  "I.R.  Comb  Co  Goodyear's  Patent 
1849-51"  (Figure  8-l8a).  The  fine-tooth  comb 
reads  "EMPEROR"— this  particular  model  has 
not  been  located  in  the  literature  (Figure  8-1 8b), 
but  the  design  and  the  style  of  the  imprint  is 
similar  to  the  "Minerva"  comb  advertized  in  the 
1922  Montgomery  Ward  catalog  (MW  1922: 
391).  Perhaps  the  names  on  the  combs  were 
intended  to  distinguish  between  men's  and 
women's  combs.  The  "Emperor"  comb 
excavated  from  the  boardinghouse  backlot 
measures  3  1/4  inches  long  by  1  5/8  inches  wide. 
By  comparison,  the  "Minerva"  comb  pictured  in 
the  1922  Mongomery  Ward  catalog  is  much 
larger,  measuring  4  inches  long  by  2  1/2  inches 
wide,  and  thus  would  be  better  suited  to 
women's  longer  hair.  Finally,  level  10  (in  Trench 
#2)  in  the  yard  area  yielded  a  single  fragment  of 
a  rubber  straight  comb. 


I.R.G0MBC2  GOODY £ARbPAUnMi  .o«*»j    .. 


Personal  Effects   161 


A. 


B. 


0       10      20 

SCALE  1:1 


Figure  8-18.  Two  hard  rubber  combs  with  imprints.  A)  Side  or  back  comb  with  bent 
bridge  (see  also  Figure  8-16d).  B)  Fine-tooth  comb  (see  also  Figure  8-16b).  Both  combs 
were  found  in  level  1  of  the  boardinghouse  backlot.  (Drawing  by  Leslie  A.  Mead.) 


262    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  8-19.  1917  photograph  of  textile  worker  drawing-in,  showing  the  use  of  hair 
combs  and  hair  pins  to  keep  the  hair  up.  Note  also  the  beaded  necklace.  (Reproduced 
courtesy  of  the  Museum  of  American  Textile  History.) 


Personal   Effects   163 


Figure  8-20.  1917  photograph  of  mill  worker  filling  a  shuttle,  showing  the  use  of  a  bar 
pin  on  the  front  of  her  work  smock.  (Reproduced  courtesy  of  the  Museum  of  American 
Textile  History.) 


164   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Leather 

Artifactual   Summary 

Some  fragmentary  leather  remains  were 
recovered  from  the  Lowell  excavations,  very  few 
of  which  were  diagnostic.  Twenty-eight  possible 
shoe  fragments  and  10  possible  shoelace 
fragments  are  among  the  almost  150  leather 
fragments  found.  Another  14  pieces  are  from 
straps  of  some  sort,  some  of  which  have  holes 
punched  into  them  and  are  probably  parts  of 
bridle  or  saddle  straps.  There  is  one  piece  of 
leather  cut  in  the  shape  of  a  4-leaf  clover  that 
was  probably  an  applique  of  some  sort,  but  to 
what  it  was  applied  is  unknown.  The  rest  of  the 
leather  fragments  are  unidentifiable  either 
because  of  their  poor  state  of  preservation,  their 
small  size,  or  their  lack  of  diagnostic  detail.  Only 
the  shoe  and  shoelace  fragments  will  be  dealt 
with  in  any  detail  here. 


Operation  A 

In  Operation  A  2  narrow  strips  of  leather  with 
stitching  holes  were  found  in  level  F  of  the  cellar 
stairs  (Feature  23)  as  well  as  one  fragment  from 
the  back  of  the  heel  that  has  square  stitching 
holes  (in  level  A  of  the  cellar  stairs).  The  privy 
(Feature  45)  yielded  a  curved  piece  of  leather, 
probably  from  the  back  part  of  the  shoe.  Level  B 
of  the  privy  yielded  a  complete  sole  and  heel  (in 
2  pieces)  of  what  was  probably  a  woman's  shoe 
based  on  its  small  size  and  narrow  width 
(approximately  7.5  cm  across  the  ball  of  the  foot 
and  just  3.5  cm  across  the  arch).  The  heel  is  of 
stacked  leather,  almost  2  cm  high,  and  its  shape 
is  relatively  straight,  angling  down  slightly  in  the 
back.  Eight  nails  are  visible  in  the  heel  area  of 
the  sole,  coming  up  from  the  heel.  The  toe  is 
neither  pointed  nor  rounded,  but  somewhere  in 
between. 

Two  small  leather  fragments  with  rectangular 
stitching  holes  were  found  on  the  cobble  surface 
(Feature  15)  and  3  fragments  of  a  shoe  heel  were 
uncovered  in  level  3  of  Feature  16.  Just  one 
small  fragment  of  a  sole  with  stitching  holes  at 
the  edge  was  fourd  in  level  1  of  the  open  yard 
area,  while  4  pieces  of  a  small  sole,  probably  to  a 
woman's  shoe,  were  found  in  level  3.  The 
condition  of  this  object  is  quite  fragmentary  and 
no  heel  remains.  The  toe  portion  is  broken  off, 
and  again,  the  gender  determination  of  this  sole 
is  based  on  its  size  (7  cm  across  the  ball  of  the 
foot  and  4  cm  across  the  arch). 


Operation   B 

The  well  excavated  in  Trench  #2  of  Operation 
B  (Feature  2)  yielded  several  shoe  remains.  Six 
shoelace  fragments  were  found  in  level  9b,  while 
2  were  excavated  from  level  9c  along  with  2  other 
shoe  fragments,  both  from  the  back  of  the  shoe, 
one  with  rectanglular  stitching  holes.  Three  flat 
leather  fragments  with  small  holes  along  the 
edges  were  found  in  level  2  of  the  privy  (Feature 
61)  and  are  probably  shoe  parts.  The  rest  of  the 
shoe  remains  from  Operation  B  were  found  in 
levels  1  and  2  of  the  open  yard  areas.  A  total  of  4 
sole  fragments  came  out  of  level  1 — 2  have 
round  stitching  holes  around  the  edges  and  one 
has  a  possible  tack  attached  to  it.  In  addition, 
one  very  delicate  fragment  of  a  shoelace  was 
found  in  level  1.  Level  2  yielded  4  leather 
fragments  with  triangular  stitching  holes  that  are 
probably  shoe  parts. 

As  can  be  seen  from  the  above  discussion, 
very  few  of  the  leather  finds  are  diagnostic,  or 
even  clearly  identifiable.  The  most  that  can  be 
said  for  many  of  them  is  that  they  probably 
belong  to  some  part  of  a  shoe.  The  two  most 
complete  objects,  both  probably  soles  to 
women's  shoes,  came  out  of  Operation  A,  but 
only  one  retains  the  diagnostic  parts  of  the 
shoe — the  heel  and  the  toe.  The  softly  rounded 
toe  of  the  sole  from  level  B  of  the  privy  behind 
the  tenement  is  consistent  with  styles  at  the  end 
of  the  19th  century  and  beginning  of  the  20th 
century.  On  the  one  hand,  there  was  a 
movement  away  from  the  harshly  narrow-toed 
shoes  fashionable  in  the  1880s  (Swan  1982:  51) 
while  on  the  other  hand  the  square-toed  shoes  of 
the  1890s  were  giving  way  to  more  feminine 
shapes  (The  National  Society  of  Colonial  Dames 
of  America  [hereafter  NSCDA]  1986:  31).  Still, 
since  the  toe  of  the  shoe  from  Lowell  is  not 
extreme  in  shape,  and  since  toe  styles  fluctuated 
back  and  forth  from  pointed  to  square 
throughout  the  18th  and  19th  centuries  (Swan 
1982;  NSCDA  1986),  nothing  definite  can  be  said 
about  it.  Much  the  same  is  true  for  the  heel. 
Stacked  heels  were  available  as  early  as  the  18th 
century  (NSCDA  1986:  31),  and  the  shape  of  the 
heel  is  not  very  distinctive — it  is  neither  high  nor 
low,  nor  is  it  wedged  or  flared.  If  this  is  indeed  a 
woman's  shoe,  the  only  thing  that  can  be  said 
about  it  is  that  it  is  clearly  not  a  high-fashion 
design.  The  toe  and  heel  are  rather  plain  and 
seemingly  built  for  comfort,  not  style.  The  effect 
is  of  a  practical  shoe,  perhaps  even  a  working 
shoe. 


Personal   Effects   165 


Textiles 

Artifactual    Summary 

Almost  60  textile  fragments  (25  are  actually 
from  one  piece  of  cloth,  badly  disintegrating) 
were  recovered.  One  of  these  is  a  fiber  lamp 
wick,  6  are  wool  batting,  1  is  probably  oil  cloth,  4 
are  ribbon  fragments  (3  of  which  came  out  of 
Trench  #1,  level  3),  1  is  possibly  silk,  1  is  wool,  and 
the  rest  are  most  likely  cotton. 


Operation  A 

Only  9  of  the  fragments  came  out  of  Operation 
A:  a  piece  of  silk  and  a  piece  of  cotton  from 
levels  E  and  F,  respectively,  of  the  cellar  stairs 
(Feature  23);  2  fragments  of  unidentifiable 
cotton  cloth  from  level  B  of  the  privy  (Feature 
45);  2  pieces  of  brown  coarse-weave  cotton  cloth 
from  level  1  of  the  yard;  a  piece  of  wool  batting 
from  level  3  of  the  yard;  and  2  cotton  fragments 
of  indeterminable  color  from  level  2  in  the  ell 
area  of  the  tenement. 


Operation   B 

In  Operation  B,  a  single  fragment  of  a  dark 
brown  or  black  ribbon  came  out  of  level  9d  of  the 
well  (Feature  2)  and  five  pieces  of  felt  or  woolen 
batting  were  recovered  from  level  1  of  the  privy 
(Feature  61).  The  rest  of  the  fragments  were 
found  in  the  open  yard  area.  Level  1  yielded  5 
fragments  of  cotton  cloth,  a  piece  of  very  densely 
woven  material  that  seems  to  be  oil  cloth,  the 
lamp  wick,  and  6  fragments  of  what  looks  like 
brown  wool  cloth,  some  pieces  with  the  selvage 
edge  intact.  Level  2  contained  a  single  fragment 
of  fine-weave,  2-color  cotton  cloth,  and  level  3 
yielded  just  one  piece  of  unidentified  white 
fabric.  A  herringbone-pattern  weave  fabric  was 
found  in  25  pieces  in  level  5  of  Trench  #2,  one  of 
the  pieces  with  a  rusted  nail  attached  to  it. 

Although  the  state  of  preservation  of  most  of 
these  textiles  is  poor,  it  is  possible  that  further 
analysis  of  the  various  materials  and  weaves 
could  yield  interesting  results.  For  instance,  it 
may  be  possible  to  determine  if  any  of  the 
fabrics  could  have  been  manufactured  at  one  of 
the  mills  in  Lowell,  or,  conversely,  if  any  of  them 
were  positively  brought  in  from  outside  the  city 
(or  even  the  country). 


Discussion 

A  clear  pattern  of  artifact  distribution  emerges 
from  the  above  descriptions.  In  absolute  terms, 
more  artifacts  related  to  personal  adornment 


were  excavated  from  behind  the  boardinghouse 
(Operation  B)  than  from  the  tenement  lot 
(Operation  A).  Leaving  aside  the  leather  and 
textiles  which  are  more  subject  to  preservation 
bias,  Operation  A  yielded  50  buttons  and  studs, 
24  beads  and  pieces  of  jewelry,  and  17  combs  or 
hair  ornaments,  while  Operation  B  yielded  79,  8, 
and  24  of  each  class  of  items  respectively.  Only 
jewelry  and  beads  occurred  with  greater 
frequency  in  Operation  A  than  in  Operation  B. 

Perhaps  more  significant  than  these  absolute 
numbers  is  the  fact  that  a  much  greater 
percentage  of  each  class  of  items  was  found  in 
the  open  yard  areas  (as  opposed  to  within 
features  or  within  the  building  foundation  areas) 
of  Operation  B  as  compared  with  Operation  A. 
Hence,  71%  (56)  of  the  buttons  and  studs 
excavated  from  the  boardinghouse  backlot 
came  from  out  in  the  open  yard  area  compared 
to  just  26%  (13)  of  the  total  from  behind  the 
tenement.  Of  the  beads  and  jewelry  from 
Operation  B,  38%  (3)  of  the  total  were  found  in 
the  yard  area  compared  to  13%  (also  3)  from 
Operation  A.  Finally,  the  yard  of  Operation  B 
yielded  50%  (12)  of  the  total  number  of  combs 
and  hair  ornaments  excavated  while  the  yard 
area  of  Operation  A  contained  only  24%  (4)  of  the 
total. 

This  pattern  could  simply  be  the  result  of  the 
fact  that  greater  numbers  of  people  resided  in 
the  boardinghouse  over  the  years.  Nonetheless, 
it  points  to  the  possibility  that  the  yard  of  the 
boardinghouse  was  not  as  neatly  kept  as  the 
yard  of  the  tenement.  Also,  the  fact  that  more 
jewelry  was  found  in  the  tenement  excavation 
than  in  the  boardinghouse  backlot  may  be 
reflective  of  the  higher  socioeconomic  status  of 
the  tenement  residents  or  simply  of  the  fact  that 
women  living  there  were  not  necessarily  working 
women  (i.e.,  they  could  have  been  supervisors' 
non-working  wives). 

This  observation  is  not  supported  by  the 
button  data,  however.  If  the  buttons  (exclusive 
of  the  studs)  are  divided  into  two  classes,  plain 
(two-  and  four-hole  white  porcelains)  and  fancy 
(all  others,  including  pie-crusts,  hobnails,  and 
banded  varieties),  it  is  clear  that  there  is  not  a 
great  difference  between  the  two  operations.  Of 
the  45  buttons  in  Operation  A,  35%  (16)  are  fancy. 
Similarly,  of  the  67  buttons  found  in  Operation  B, 
34%  (23)  are  fancy.  These  percentages  suggest 
that,  at  least  in  terms  of  buttons,  the  two 
households  operated  on  a  similar  level.  It  is 
difficult  to  make  a  similar  observation  based  on 
the  combs  and  hair  ornaments  since,  as 
discussed  above,  they  functioned  on  both 
utilitarian  and  decorative  levels,  and  a  division  of 


166   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


the  assemblage  into  plain  and  fancy  items  would 
be  highly  subjective. 

What  there  is  to  be  learned  about  clothing 
and  fashion  at  the  Lowell  boardinghouses  and 
tenements  through  an  examination  of  the 
personal  artifacts  is  limited.  The  presence  of 
items  of  costume  jewelry,  some  fancy  pressed 
glass  buttons,  a  few  beads,  and  some  decorative 
hair  ornaments  hint  that  the  residents  of  the 
boardinghouse  and  the  tenement  may  have 
made  some  concessions  to  fashion  and 
ornamentation.  But  the  evidence  for  this  is  slim. 
There  are  no  well  preserved  textiles  to  inform  us 
about  the  quality  of  the  residents'  clothing,  and 
the  one  shoe  fragment  with  identifiable 
characteristics  seems  to  be  from  a  shoe 
designed  for  work,  not  fashion.  Furthermore,  the 
overwhelming  majority  of  buttons  are  of  the 
plain  white  utlitarian  variety — stark  reminders 
that  we  are  looking  at  the  material  assemblage 
of  a  group  of  working  class  people.  These 
buttons  were  popular  on  "wash  frocks  and  other 
utility  dresses"  (Albert  1941:  47)  as  well  as  being 
used  as  regular  shirt  buttons.  The  combs  and 
hair  pins,  though  decorative,  were  also  utilitarian 
in  nature  inasmuch  as  they  served  the  practical 
purpose  of  keeping  the  hair  out  of  the  workers' 
faces  (Figure  8-19).  The  jewelry  is  perhaps  the 
only  truly  non-utlitarian  group  of  personal 
artifacts  found  at  the  site,  but  even  jewelry  could 
be  found  in  the  workplace  (Figures  8-19,  8-20). 

Perhaps  the  most  eloquent  testimony  to  the 
quality  of  the  material  life  enjoyed  by  the  Boott 
Mills'  boardinghouse  and  tenement  residents  is 
the  relative  absence  of  variety.  There  was  a  wide 
range  of  goods  available  at  the  end  of  the  19th 
century  and  a  proliferation  of  materials  used  to 
make  them.  As  discussed  above,  fashion  in  hair 
was  elaborate,  as  were  the  ornaments  available 
to  decorate  the  styles.  Yet  the  combs  and  hair 
pins  found  in  the  backlots  of  Lowell  tend  toward 
the  pedestrian.  Similarly,  the  variety  of 
materials  and  styles  available  in  buttons  was 
greater  in  the  mid  19th  century  than  it  ever  had 
been  (Epstein  1968:  49),  yet  86  (71%)  of  all  the 
buttons  and  studs  found  at  the  site  are  made  of 
white  porcelain,  73  of  which  (60%  of  the  total)  are 
completely  undecorated.  There  are  not  even 
any  of  the  painted  or  transfer-printed  porcelain 
buttons  and  studs  that  were  popular  from  the 
1860s  on  (Epstein  1968: 50). 

It  is  interesting  to  note  the  gender  affiliations 
of  the  personal  effects.  Most  of  the  artifacts 
were  probably  used  by  women,  including  the  two 
shoe-sole  fragments  that  were  identified. 
Certainly,  the  more  decorative  items  can  be 
associated  almost  unequivocally  with  female 
use.    These  would  include  the  side  and  back 


combs,  the  barrettes,  the  fancy  buttons  (with  the 
possible  exception  of  the  metal  button  with  the 
eagle  motif),  the  beads,  and  of  course  the 
jewelry. 

By  contrast,  none  of  the  personal  effects  can 
be  associated  exclusively  with  male  use.  The 
more  utilitarian  items  such  as  the  straight 
combs,  the  fine-tooth  combs,  the  plain  white 
buttons,  and  the  studs  were  probably  used  by 
both  sexes.  Straight  combs  and  fine-tooth 
combs  were  used  for  grooming — straight  combs 
to  untangle  the  hair  and  fine-tooth  combs  to 
remove  dirt,  dandruff,  or  lice.  Most  of  the 
straight  combs  advertized  in  the  mail-order 
catalogs  of  the  1890s  and  early  20th  century  (e.g., 
SR  1897:  326;  SR  1908:  1003;  MW  1922:  391)  are 
not  distinguished  by  sex.  There  are,  however, 
some  exceptions,  most  notably  a  narrow  coarse- 
and  fine-tooth  comb  identified  as  a  "barber's"  or 
"men's"  comb  and  a  coarse-tooth  comb  with  a 
handle  labelled  a  "princess  dressing  comb,"  or 
"for  ladies."  None  of  the  straight  combs 
recovered  from  Lowell,  however,  can  be 
positively  identified  as  either  of  these  varieties, 
and  are  most  likely  the  unisex  kind.  The  fine- 
tooth  combs  are  not  identified  in  the  mail-order 
catalogs  as  male  or  female,  but  as  discussed 
above  it  is  possible  that  the  name  imprinted  on 
them  may  have  denoted  gender  affiliation. 

The  porcelain  buttons  were  doubtless  used  on 
clothing  worn  by  both  sexes,  particularly  after 
the  advent  of  the  ladies'  shirtwaist  towards  the 
end  of  the  19th  century.  The  shirtwaist, 
essentially  a  man's  shirt  adapted  to  female  use, 
had  a  collar  and  cuffs  and  was  buttoned  down 
the  front  to  the  waist  (Wilcox  1969:  318).  Figures 
8-21  and  8-22  show  the  buttons  in  use  on  both 
men's  and  women's  clothing.  Studs  were  also 
used  by  both  sexes.  From  the  middle  of  the  18th 
century  they  were  used  as  cuff  buttons  by  men, 
and  by  the  1830s  their  use  was  extended  to  the 
front  of  the  shirt  (i.e.,  to  function  as  buttons  do 
today  on  a  shirt  front).  Around  1860  the 
separate  collar  came  into  everyday  use,  and  a 
stud  was  employed  to  fasten  it  to  the  shirt  at  the 
front  and /or  back  of  the  neck  (Cunnington, 
Cunnington,  and  Beard  1960:  207;  e.g.,  MW  1895: 
92).  Studs  were  also  used  on  men's  vests  as  well 
as  on  ladies'  shirtwaists  and  collars  (see,  e.g., 
Figure  8-3,  4th  stud  from  the  right,  bottom  row), 
the  latter  usually  being  made  of  porcelain  with 
handpainted  designs  (Luscomb  1967:  191)  or 
decorated  with  jewels.  It  is  impossible  to 
distinguish  among  the  different  kinds  of  studs  or 
to  which  sex  they  belonged  unless  they  bear 
some  distinctive  decoration.  None  of  the 
porcelain  studs  excavated  from  the  Lowell 
backlots  are  decorated  except  for  a  few  that  have 


Personal   Effects   167 


"^^^-j^Fu--- 


Figure  8-21.  Women  sitting  on  the  back  steps  of  a  Homestead,  Pennsylvania, 
board inghouse  ca.  1910,  showing  the  use  of  plain  white  utilitarian  buttons  down  the  front 
of  the  shirtwaist  dress  of  the  woman  to  the  right  in  front.  (Lewis  Hine  photograph 
reproduced  from  Byington  1910.) 


168   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


raised  concentric  rings  on  the  wide  base.  Rose 
and  Santeford  (1985:  98)  identify  similarly 
decorated  studs  recovered  from  an  Arkansas 
cemetery  as  cuff  studs,  but  this  functional 
attribution  is  doubtless  a  result  of  the  location, 
relative  to  the  body,  where  the  studs  were  found 
within  the  burial. 

Another  research  topic  to  which  this 
assemblage  lends  itself  is  a  look  at  possible 
patterns  of  consumer  behavior  among  the 
working  class  residents  of  these  two  units.  As 
discussed  above,  the  pattern  of  artifact 
distribution  does  not  provide  unequivocal 
evidence  for  contrasting  the  material  life  of  the 
tenement  and  boardinghouse  residents.  Except 
for  absolute  numbers  of  artifacts,  and 
differences  in  spatial  distribution,  the  overall 
quality  of  artifacts  is  very  similar  between  the  two 
households.  The  emphasis  on  utilitarian  items 
has  already  been  mentioned,  but  another, 
related  phenomenon  can  also  be  observed. 
Many  of  the  items  excavated  from  Operations  A 
and  B  tend  to  be  inexpensive  substitutes  for 
more  expensive  materials.  Black  glass  buttons 
substitute  for  jet,  plastic  and  rubber  hair 
ornaments  for  tortoise  shell,  paste  for  diamonds, 
green  glass  for  emeralds,  and  porcelain  buttons 
for  shell. 

The  price  differences  between  the  real  and  the 
imitation  item  were  sometimes  dramatic.  For 
instance,  the  1895  Montgomery  Ward  catalog 
lists  "Agate  Buttons,  White  and  Colored"  at  10 
cents  per  12  dozen.  By  contrast,  four-hole  pearl 
buttons  of  the  same  size  sold  for  20  cents  per 
dozen.  Even  the  "White  Fancy  Pearl  Agates" 
(pie-crust  borders)  were  significantly  less 
expensive  than  the  real  pearl  buttons,  retailing 
at  25  cents  per  12  dozen  for  the  same  size  (MW 
1895:  85).  The  same  catalog  pictures  fancy  hair 
ornaments  and  offers  them  in  both  real  and 
imitation  tortoise  shell.  "Real  Shell  Side  Combs" 
are  advertized  at  48  cents  per  pair,  the 
"Imitation"  at  10  cents  per  pair.  Likewise,  a  pair 
of  "Fancy  Top  Shell  Side  Combs"  went  for  50 
cents  while  a  pair  of  the  "Imitation"  ones  cost 
only  20  cents  (MW  1895:  183).  The  same  pattern 
can  be  detected  in  the  Sears  Roebuck  catalog  of 
1897. 

In  conclusion,  the  material  assemblage  of 
artifacts  relating  to  personal  clothing  and 
adornment  excavated  from  the  tenement  and 
boardinghouse  backlots  of  the  Boott  Mills 
probably  poses  more  questions  than  it  answers. 
Some  basic  observations  can  be  made 
contrasting  the  two  households;  the  yard  area  of 
the  tenement  may  have  been  maintained  better 
than  the  boardinghouse  yard  and  the  tenement 
families  may  have  spent  more  money  on  jewelry. 


Yet  the  overwhelming  truth  about  the  two 
assemblages  is  that  they  are  more  alike  than 
different,  both  emphasizing  the  practical  and 
inexpensive  over  the  fashionable  and  precious. 
The  fact  that  many  of  the  personal  effects  are 
associated  with  women's  use  and  almost  none 
exclusively  with  men's  use  probably  says  more 
about  gender  consumer  behavior  than 
demographics — the  mill  girl  era  was  long  over 
when  these  deposits  were  laid  down,  and  the 
census  research  shows  that  both  units  were 
mixed  by  the  turn  of  the  century  (Bond  1987). 

In  the  final  analysis,  however,  the  value  of  this 
assemblage  is  as  a  comparative  collection.  To 
accurately  address  any  of  the  issues  discussed 
above  would  require  an  undertaking  beyond  the 
scope  of  this  report.  Ideally,  what  is  needed  is  to 
contrast  and  compare  the  assemblage  with 
material  from  other  kinds  of  households 
occupied  at  the  end  of  the  19th  century.  Only 
then  can  we  see  how  the  material  life  of  19th- 
century  mill  workers  may  have  been  different 
from  that  of  other  classes  of  people.  It  is  hoped 
that,  with  this  report,  the  data  for  such  a 
comparative  analysis  is  now  accessible. 


Chapter  9 
FAUNAL  REMAINS  FROM  THE  BOOTT  MILLS  BOARDINGHOUSES 


by  David  B.  Landon 


Introduction 


The  initial  historical  research  into  food  ways  in 
the  Lowell  boardinghouses  was  designed 
primarily  to  provide  a  comprehensive 
framework  for  the  interpretation  of  faunal 
remains  recovered  archeologically  as  part  of  the 
Lowell  Boott  Mills  project  (Landon  1987). 
General  changes  taking  place  during  the  19th 
century  were  described  to  help  understand  the 
changing  market  system  within  the  city  of  Lowell 
itself.  For  the  boardinghouses,  a  basic  pattern  of 
food  purchase  and  preparation  was  outlined, 
and  some  basic  expectations  for  boardinghouse 
diet  were  formulated.  The  major  emphasis  of 
this  research  was  to  look  at  the  various 
purchasing  options  of  the  boardinghouse 
keepers  and  to  develop  a  relative  price  structure 
for  the  analysis  of  the  meat  purchasing  patterns 
represented  by  faunal  remains. 

The  major  focus  of  this  chapter  will  be  to  use 
this  background  as  an  interpretive  basis  for  the 
examination  of  the  meat  purchasing  patterns  of 
the  boardinghouse  keepers.  In  addition,  the 
spatial  distribution  of  the  faunal  material 
recovered  as  well  as  its  condition  will  be  utilized 
to  gain  insight  into  the  conditions  of  daily  life  at 
the  boardinghouses.  The  material  recovered 
during  the  test  excavations  will  also  be  included 
in  this  discussion.  The  procedures  used  for  the 
analysis  will  be  outlined  to  provide  an 
introduction  to  a  general  discussion  of  the 
assemblage.  The  focus  will  then  shift  to  an 
examination  of  modifications  to  the  bones  with  a 
particular  emphasis  on  rodent  gnawing  and 
butchery.  Finally,  the  emphasis  will  be  on 
interpreting  the  purchasing  pattern  represented 
by  the  specific  cuts  of  meat  from  which  the 
faunal  remains  were  derived.  Although  the 
faunal  material  to  be  discussed  is  from  a 
number  of  different  boardinghouse  units,  the 
small  sample  size,  the  short  time  period 
represented,  and  the  similar  market  options  and 
economic  constraints  of  the  units'  residents  all 
support  the  analysis  of  the  material  as  a  single 
assemblage. 


Procedures 

In  terms  of  the  excavation  procedures,  all 
bone  from  the  site  was  saved,  and  all  the  soil 


excavated  was  passed  through  quarter-inch 
mesh  screen.  No  field  conservation  was  carried 
out  for  any  of  the  faunal  remains.  All  material 
recovered  was  returned  to  the  archeological 
research  laboratory  at  Boston  University  to 
undergo  analysis.  The  bones  that  were  strong 
enough  were  cleaned  by  dry  brushing.  All  the 
material  was  rebagged  in  clean  storage  bags  and 
placed  in  acid-free  storage  boxes  to  await 
analysis. 

During  the  analysis,  the  entire  faunal  sample 
was  sorted  through  three  times.  The 
examination  and  analysis  began  while  the  bones 
were  first  being  numbered.  While  provenience 
designations  were  being  inked  on  the  bones 
(with  the  exception  of  the  smallest  fragments), 
basic  notes  were  taken  about  the  group  of  bones 
from  each  individual  bag,  which  corresponded  to 
the  provenience  unit.  This  first  observation  of 
the  collection  served  as  an  introduction  to  the 
range  of  materials  present  and  the  condition  of 
the  faunal  material.  Since  this  was  the  only  point 
at  which  the  material  was  actually  physically 
grouped  by  provenience,  it  offered  an 
opportunity  for  some  preliminary  observations 
about  the  variability  by  unit  in  terms  of  gross 
preservation  and  the  quantity  and  quality  of 
materials  recovered. 

Once  the  bones  were  numbered,  more 
intensive  sorting  and  identification  began.  At 
this  stage,  each  bone  that  could  be  identified  as 
a  specific  body  part  was  bagged  separately  with 
an  information  card.  This  was  done  to  allow  the 
collection  to  be  divided  by  class  and  body  part. 
Body  parts  that  were  difficult  to  identify  to  a 
particular  genus  and  species,  such  as  ribs, 
vertebrae,  and  long  bone  shaft  fragments,  were 
bagged  together  (by  provenience)  with  a  single 
card.  Fragments  that  appeared  to  lack 
diagnostic  attributes  and  were  difficult  to 
identify  as  a  specific  body  part  were  also  bagged 
together  by  provenience  and  designated  non- 
identified  (NID).  The  initial  information 
recorded  on  the  cards  included  the  site  name, 
provenience,  element,  taxon,  and  symmetry. 
Identification  was  based  on  a  variety  of  written 
sources  (Gustafson  and  Brown  1979;  Olsen  1964, 
1968;  Schmid  1972;  Sisson  and  Grossman  1953)  as 
well  as  comparative  osteological  material 
provided  through  the  laboratory  of  the  Center 
for  Materials   Research   in   Archaeology  and 


169 


170    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Ethnography  (CMRAE)  and  Boston  University. 
In  addition  to  the  categories  already  mentioned, 
the  state  of  epiphyseal  fusion,  degree  of  burning, 
visible  rodent  or  carnivore  damage,  butchery 
marks,  other  modifications,  and  comments 
(such  as  bone  mends)  were  recorded  at  this 
point.  Five  stages  of  bone  burning  were  defined, 
based  on  the  fact  that  bone  turns  first  grey  then 
white  as  it  burns. 

Stages  Of  Bone  Burning 


Stage  0 

unburned 

Stage  1 

partially  grey  or  black 

Stage  2 

totally  grey  or  black 

Stage  3 

totally  grey  or  black  and 

partially   white 

Stage  4 

totally  white 

Since  butchery  was  considered  to  be 
important  to  the  analysis  of  this  faunal 
assemblage,  specific  types  of  butchery  marks 
were  defined. 


Figure  9-1.    Proximal  view  of  a  butchered  cow 
humerus  showing  striations  left  by  a  saw. 


Butchery  Marks 

Scrape  (SC)        a  straight  mark  on  the  bone  that 
does  not  significantly  gouge  the  surface 


Cut  (CT)     a  straight  mark  on  the  bone  that  gouges 
the  surface 


Chop  (CH)         a  cut  that  removes  a  section  of  the 
bone 


Shear  (SH)        a  chop  that  goes  through  a  portion 
of  the  bone  leaving  a  straight  edge 

Saw  (SW)  a    series    of    parallel    striations 

caused  by  a  toothed  cutting  instrument  (Figure  9-1) 


Several  things  must  be  pointed  out  about  the 
categories  of  butchery  marks.  Only  a  saw 
definitely  implies  the  use  of  a  different  tool,  as 
the  other  types  of  butchery  marks  could 
conceivably  be  made  with  a  single  tool  applied 
with  differential  skill  or  force.  Further, 
taphonomic  processes  could  tend  to  skew  the 
pattern  of  butchery  marks  represented  by 
masking  or  removing  evidence.  Decomposition, 
such  as  exfoliation,  would  tend  to  remove 
smaller  marks  from  the  surface  of  the  bone  as  it 
destroyed  the  lamellar  surface.  As  a  result, 
scrapes  might  be  underrepresented. 
Additionally,  some  saw  marks  might  be  recorded 
as  shears  if  the  striations  are  not  visible.  It  is  also 
possible  for  marks  to  be  left  on  the  bones  which 
appear  to  be,  but  are  not,  butchery  marks,  such 
as  scars  from  post-depositional  movement  or 
even  impact  with  a  trowel  during  excavation.  To 


the  extent  that  it  was  possible  these  factors  were 
taken  into  consideration.  Bones  with 
questionable  butchery  marks  were  routinely 
examined  using  an  American  Optical 
Corporation  #569  or  Bausch  and  Lomb  low 
power  stereo  microscope. 

In  addition  to  recording  visible  butchery 
marks  for  all  the  bone  fragments,  butchered 
bones  which  appeared  to  represent  a  particular 
cut  of  meat  or  a  particular  pattern  of  butchery 
were  illustrated  on  line  drawings  of  the  major 
skeletal  elements  (Figures  9-6,  9-7,  9-8,  and  9-9, 
based  loosely  on  Lyman  1977),  and  a  select  few 
were  photographed  (Figure  9-10).  The  line 
drawings  used  to  record  butchered  portions  of 
bone  were  derived  from  ink  tracings  of 
illustrations  in  atlases  and  books  (Gustafson  and 
Brown  1979;  Schmid  1972;  Sisson  and  Grossman 
1953,  4th  edition).  All  the  photographs  illustrated 
in  this  report  were  taken  using  a  Polaroid  MP-4 
camera.  The  results  of  this  analysis  of  butchery 
will  be  presented  in  greater  detail  during  the 
discussion  of  the  results. 

The  final  stage  of  the  analysis  began  once  the 
bones  had  been  identified  to  class  and  body  part 
and  the  preliminary  taxonomic  assignments  had 
taken  place.  The  sample  was  sorted  through  for 
the  final  time  one  body  part  at  a  time.  The 
individual  cards  were  numbered  sequentially  to 
facilitate  later  entry  of  the  information  into  a 
database.  All  the  attributes  mentioned  so  far 
were  recorded  by  card  number  (see  appended 
catalogue).  A  number  of  other  attributes  were 
also  recorded.  All  of  the  faunal  material 
contained  in  a  single  bag  was  weighed  to  the 


Zooarcheology    111 


nearest  0.1  g  using  a  Mettler  P1000  or  Ohaus 
triple  beam  balance.  Measurements  of  the 
bones  were  also  taken  at  this  stage,  based  on  von 
den  Dreisch  (1976).  There  were  few  complete 
bones  in  the  sample  so  applicable 
measurements  of  fragments  were  made 
whenever     possible.  Final     taxonomic 

assignments  were  made  and  some  of  the  more 
difficult  bones  to  identify  (especially  the  rodents) 
were  taken  to  the  Museum  of  Comparative 
Zoology  for  comparison  with  identified 
specimens.  The  age  of  the  animals  at  their  time 
of  death  based  on  the  state  of  epiphyseal  fusion 
and  (in  a  single  instance)  tooth  eruption  was 
recorded  using  information  contained  in  Silver 
(1963).  Probably  the  most  important  activity  at 
this  stage  was  the  assignment  of  the  bones  that 
could  be  identified  as  a  specific  body  part,  but 
not  to  a  particular  genus,  to  size  categories.  This 
was  especially  crucial  for  the  long  bone  shaft 
fragments,  rib  fragments,  and  vertebral 
fragments,  most  of  which  could  not  be  positively 
identified.  Much  of  this  material  was  very 
fragmentary  and  as  a  result,  assignment  to  a 
particular  size  category  was  based  primarily  on 
the  thickness  of  the  cortical  bone  present  as 
opposed  to  the  fragment's  overall  size.  This  is 
important  to  point  out  because  the  size  category 
assignment  is  probably  biased.  Fragmentation 
of  a  bone  tends  to  make  it  smaller.  As  a  result, 
smaller  size  categories  tend  to  be 
overrepresented,  while  large  categories  would  be 
underrepresented.  Further,  it  should  be 
remembered  that  the  potential  for  size  variation 
in  a  population  based  on  age,  sex,  or  other 
factors  introduces  a  certain  amount  of  overlap  in 
the  size  categories.  As  the  sample  was  almost 
entirely  mammals,  the  size  categories  were  used 
exclusively  for  mammal  bones. 


sample  by  fragment  count  and  almost  98%  of  the 
sample  by  weight.  Included  also  were  a  small 
number  of  bird  bones,  as  well  as  some  shell 
fragments  from  bivalves  and  two  fish  bones.  The 
286  unidentified  mammal  and  bird  bones 
comprised  52.3%  of  the  sample  by  fragment 
count,  but  only  9.1%  of  the  sample  by  weight. 
This  demonstrates  quite  clearly  the  very  small 
size  of  most  of  the  bones  that  were  not  identified. 
Identified  mammal  and  bird  bones,  while 
comprising  only  41.9%  of  the  total  number  of 
fragments,  made  up  over  90%  of  the  sample  by 
weight.  Though  not  without  certain  exceptions, 
this  suggests  a  relationship  between  the  size  of 
the  fragment  and  how  easily  it  was  identified.  It 
could  also  be  suggested  that  some 
preservational  bias  is  visible,  with  the  densest 
bones  having  survived  post-depositional 
decomposition  best  and  thus  being  more  easily 
identified. 


Table    9-1.       Basic    quantification    of 
assemblage  from  the  boardinghouses. 

the    faunal 

Category 
Unid.  Mammal 
Ident.  Mammal* 
Total  Mammal 

TNF*    % 
274       50.1 
222       40.6 
496       90.7 

Weight  (g) 

146.3 

1521.8 

1668.1 

% 

8.6 
89.2 
97.7 

Unidentified  Bird 
Identified 
Total  Bird 

12         2.2 

7         1.3 

19         3.5 

9.2 

8.1 

17.3 

0.5 
0.5 
1.0 

Unid.  Pelecypoda 
Unid.  Pisces 
Unid.  Gastropoda 
Totals 

29         5.3 

2         0.3 

1         0.2 

547      100.0 

21.0 

0.5 

0.1 

1707.0 

1.2 
.t 

i 

99.9 

TNF  is  the  total  number  of  fragments. 
t  Identified  at  least  as  a  body  part  of  a  specific  size 
category. 
1<0.1% 


Mammalian   Size  Categories 

Size  1      small,  rabbit  size  or  smaller 
Size  2      small/medium,  rabbit  size  to  medium  dog 
Size  3      medium,  medium  dog  to  medium  pig 
Size  4      medium/large,  large  pig  to  small  cow 
Size  5      large,  average  cow  and  larger 


The  Faunal  Assemblage 

The  total  faunal  assemblage  consisted  of  547 
fragments  weighing  1707.0  grams  (Table  9-1). 
Mammal  remains  made  up  over  90%  of  the 


The  identified  bones  are  broken  down  by 
taxon  or  size  classification  and  element  in  Table 
9-2.  Several  things  quickly  become  clear.  To 
start,  only  68  fragments  (12.4%  of  TNF)  were 
actually  identified  to  the  genus  or  probable  (cf.) 
genus  level  or  better.  The  remaining  160  bone 
fragments  recorded  in  Table  9-2  were  only 
identified  as  a  particular  body  part  and  assigned 
to  a  certain  size  category.  In  part  this  can  be 
explained  by  looking  at  the  last  column  in  Table 
9-2,  which  sums  the  bone  fragments  by  body 
part.  Of  the  bones  which  could  be  identified  as  a 
particular  body  part,  174  (31.8%  of  TNF,  76.3%  of 
fragments  included  in  Table  9-2)  were  either 


772    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Table  9-2.  Fragment  quantification  by  taxon  or  size  classification  and  element. 


Bone  Element 


long  bone  fragments 


V 


rP 


,o 


£ 


■&> 


Co*    ^ 


* 


«0 


skull  fragment 
mandible 
upper  teeth 


1L 


atlas 

other  cerv.  vert, 
thoracic  vert, 
lumbar  vert, 
uncertain  vert. 


scapula 
humerus 

"   shaft 

"   distal 
radius,  proximal 

"   shaft 

"   distal 
ulna 


1L 

1R 
1L,1R 


1L 


1L 


1L 
1L 


1L,1R 


1R 


2R 


metacarpal 
first  phalanx 
middle  phalanx 
uncertain  phalanx 


1L,1R 


1 
1R 


innominate 

illium 

femur 

"    shaft 
tibia,  shaft 

distal 
fibula,  distal 

tarsals 
metatarsal 


1L 
1R 


2R 

1R 


1L,1R 
1L,1R 


rib  fragments 
"   dorsal 
ventral 


1R 


6R,1L 
8 


tibiotarsus 

coracoid 

sternum 


1L 
1L 

1 


TOTAL 


15 


15 


Zooarcheology    1 73 


Table  9-2.     Fragment  quantification  by  taxon  or  size  classification  and  element, 
continued. 


Bone  Element 


&  ff  * 


^ 


^ 


J 


/ 


"5    ^^ 

A*    *?      ^ 


&0     it     <» 


<o 


-9 


A4*       A*      i~ 


ctf 


c°  - 


skull  fragment 
mandible 
upper  teeth 

atlas 

other  cerv.  vert, 
thoracic  vert, 
lumbar  vert, 
uncertain  vert. 

scapula 
humerus 

"   shaft 

"   distal 
radius,  proximal 

"   shaft 

"   distal 
ulna 

metacarpal 
first  phalanx 
middle  phalanx 
uncertain  phalanx 

innominate 

illium 

femur 

"   shaft 
tibia,  shaft 

"   distal 
fibula,  distal 

tarsals 
metatarsal 

rib  fragments 
"   dorsal 
"   ventral 


1 
2R,1L 


1R 
3R 


2R 
2R 


1L,1R 


- 

- 

- 

1 

2 

. 

- 

- 

- 

4 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 

_ 

2 

_ 

_ 

3 

- 

- 

- 

- 

3 

. 

3 

1 

- 

8 

- 

- 

1 

1 

2 

17 

8 

4 

1 

30 

_ 

2(1L) 

1R 

. 

8 

- 

- 

- 

- 

'2 

. 

. 

- 

- 

2 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2 

1 
1 
1 
2 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2 

1 
2 

_ 

1L 

_ 

. 

" 

1 

~ 

- 

1 

1 
1 
4 

1 
1 

- 

1 

- 

- 

_ 

1 

_ 

. 

- 

- 

1L,1R 

- 

4 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2 

- 

- 

- 

- 

4 

1 

1 

35(7L,1R) 

1L,1R 

5(2L) 

43 

- 

2(1R) 

- 

- 

10 

- 

- 

- 

1 

9 

long  bone  fragments 


14 


33 


10 


66 


tibiotarsus 

coracoid 

sternum 


TOTAL 


14 


32 


90 


18 


19 


228 


174    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


•&J 


hS   9 


01  23456789  10 


nam 


Figure  9-2.  Rat  bones  recovered  during  excavation  at  the  boardinghouses.  a,  b)  right 
dentary,  c)  left  humerus,  d)  right  tibia  and  fibula,  e)  right  innominate,  f-h)  right  femora; 
a,b,d,and  e  are  probable  black  rat  (Rattus  rattus). 


21*36789  10 


Immuiliu 


Figure  9-3.  Size  3  femur  showing  extensive  rodent  gnawing  caudal  view. 


Zooarcheology    1 75 


vertebral,  long  bone  shaft,  or  rib  fragments. 
These  body  parts  are  recognized  as  being 
among  the  most  difficult  to  identify,  and  some 
researchers  do  not  even  include  them  in  their 
analysis  (Davis  1987:  35).  This  type  of  body  part 
distribution  adversely  impacted  the  total 
number  of  specific  identifications  which  were 
possible. 

Only  six  species  were  identified,  Bos  taurus, 
Sus  scrofa,  Ovis/Capra,  Gallus  gallus,  Melegris 
gallapavo,  and  Rattus  rattus.  With  the 
exception  of  the  rat  bones,  all  of  these  represent 
standard  domestic  animals.  The  basic  pattern  of 
species  identified  in  the  assemblage  coincides 
fairly  well  with  historical  documentation  about 
the  types  of  meat  consumed  in  the 
boardinghouses  with  domestic  animals 
providing  the  bulk  of  the  meat  consumed 
supplemented  by  smaller  quantities  of  fish  and 
poultry  (Landon  1987). 

In  terms  of  the  number  of  bones  actually 
identified  for  each  type  of  animal,  represented 
by  the  last  row  in  Table  9-2,  differential 
identifiability  seems  to  have  played  a  large  part 
in  the  numerical  differences  visible.  Fully  23  of 
the  30  cow  and  probable  cow  bones  are  rib  or 
vertebral  fragments.  In  this  instance,  the  large 
size  and  density  of  some  of  these  fragments 
contributed  significantly  to  their  survival  and 
identification.  The  very  large  number  of  size  3 
rib  and  vertebral  fragments  are  quite  likely 
dominated  by  pig  and  sheep/goat  remains 
which  just  could  not  be  identified.  Similarly,  5  of 
the  9  pig  and  probable  pig  bones  are 
metacarpals,  metatarsals  or  other  tarsal  bones. 
In  addition  to  the  fact  that  the  pig  has  a  larger 
number  of  metapodial  bones,  these  bones  are 
quite  dense  (i.e.,  survive  well)  and  are  easily 
identified.  As  a  result,  this  tends  to  bias  the 
actual  representation  of  the  number  of  pig  and 
probable  pig  bones  when  compared  to  the  other 
taxa.  In  a  general  sense,  it  is  best  to  look  at  not 
just  the  number  of  fragments  from  each  taxa, 
but  also  at  which  body  parts  are  represented  and 
the  bones  included  in  the  different  size 
categories. 

Only  a  very  small  number  of  bones  gave  any 
clear  indication  of  the  age  of  the  animal  at  the 
time  of  death.  The  small  sample  size  and  the 
lack  of  any  clear  patterns  make  it  difficult  to 
formulate  any  meaningful  generalizations.  As  a 
result,  the  ages  are  reported  only  in  the 
appended  catalogue. 


Modifications 

As  Table  9-2  clearly  points  out,  rat  bones 
(Rattus    sp.  and  cf.  rattus  )  formed  one  of  the 


most  significant  components  of  the  identified 
fauna  in  the  assemblage  (Figure  9-2).  It  is 
probably  not  surprising,  therefore,  that  79  bones 
in  the  sample  (14.4%  of  TNF)  had  characteristic 
gnaw  marks  left  by  rodents  (Figure  9-3).  The 
distribution  of  bones  and  bones  with  rodent 
gnaw  marks  by  grid  square  is  shown  in  Figures 
9-4  and  9-5.  Almost  all  of  the  fragments 
recovered,  including  the  rat  bones  and  the 
bones  with  gnaw  marks,  are  concentrated  in  the 
various  features  of  the  backlots:  the  privies,  ells, 
drains,  wells,  and  the  bulkhead  entry  to  one  of 
the  boardinghouse  basements.  Faunal  material 
is  distinctly  absent  from  the  open  areas  of  the 
backlots,  suggesting  a  certain  amount  of 
maintenance  or  refuse  disposal  in  other  areas. 
The  single  largest  concentration  of  rat  bones,  as 
well  as  rodent-gnawn  bones,  was  just  inside  of 
the  back  wall  of  one  of  the  units  right  at  the  point 
where  a  bulkhead  entry  to  the  basement  went 
under  the  unit's  exterior  wall.  Rats  were 
undoubtedly  living  in  the  boardinghouses  as  well 
as  other  structures  of  the  backlots  and  were 
probably  feeding  on  stored  food  as  well  as 
discarded  food  refuse. 

None  of  the  bones  showed  any  apparent 
indication  of  carnivore  damage.  Only  a  small 
number  of  bones  had  been  burned,  and  those 
that  were  burned  were  badly  burned.  In  all 
likelihood  the  small  burned  scraps  of  bone  are 
the  result  of  pieces  of  bone  being  tossed  into  a 
fire  and  later  deposited  in  the  backlot. 


Table  9-3.    Quantification  of  bone  burning  for  the 
boardinghouses. 


Burn  Stage 

1 

2 

3 

4 
Total 


Number 

0 

0 

3 
30 
33  (6.0%  of  TNF) 


The  single  most  important  type  of 
modification  to  the  bones  was  that  caused  by 
butchery.  A  total  of  95  bones  (17.4%  of  TNF)  had 
some  type  of  butchery  mark  on  them  and  25 
(4.6%  of  TNF)  had  more  than  one  butchery  mark. 
More  than  three  quarters  of  the  butchery  marks 
were  either  shears  or  saw  marks  (see  Table  9-4). 
The  large  proportion  of  shear  and  saw  marks 
probably  represent  primary  butchery,  where  the 
major  division  of  the  carcass  took  place  before 
certain  cuts  of  meat  were  purchased  for 
consumption  in  the  boardinghouses. 


276    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


H 


<9q^ 


I  BMBM     Operalion  A 


«^!  Brick 
<^P   Slooe 

Soil  Slain 

*  ON  nw     Unit   Numb*'   (NE   Corner) 


Figure  9-4.  Plan  of  Operation  A  showing  distribution  of  bone  fragments  and  bones  with 
rodent  damage.    B-bone  fragments,  RD-rodent  damage. 


Zooarcheology    1 77 


<?    d    »'' 


L;    «•« 


Figure  9-5.  Plan  of  Operation  B  showing  distribution  of  bone  fragments  and  bones  with 
rodent  damage.   B-bone  fragments,  RD-rodent  damage. 


178    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  9-6.  Butchered  sections  of  Bos  taurus  and  size  5  ribs  from  the  boardinghouses. 
All  views  shown  are  of  right  ribs,  medial  view.  Shaded  areas  represent  the  portion 
present.   SW-saw,  BK-break 


Zooarcheology    1 79 


sw, 


Figure  9-7.  Butchered  sections  of  Bos  taunts  bones  from  the  Boardinghouses.  Shaded 
areas  represent  the  portion  present.  SW-saw,  BK-break,  Sh-shear.  Not  to  scale,  a,  b) 
Left  humerus,  volar  view,  c)  Left  humerus,  lateral  view,  d)  Right  femur,  plantar  view, 
e)  Pelvis  and  sacrum,  slightly  ventral  cranial  view.  Additional  cut  and  chop  on  caudal 
side. 


180    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


sw 


sw  . 


Figure  9-8.  Butchered  sections  of  Bos  taurus  and  cf.  Bos  taurus  bones  from  the 
Boardinghouses.  Shaded  areas  represent  the  portion  present.  SW-saw,  SH-  shear,  CT- 
cut,  BK-break.  Not  to  scale,  a)  Cervical  vertebra,  caudal  view,  b)  Atlas,  cranial  view,  c) 
Thoracic  vertebra,  cranial  view,  d)  Thoracic  vertebra,  right  lateral  view,  e)  Left  scapula, 
lateral  view. 


Zooarcheology    181 


SC 


sw 


sw 


Figure  9-9.  Butchered  sections  of  Sus  scrofa  and  Ovis/Capra  bones  from  the 
boardinghouses.  Shaded  areas  represent  the  portion  present.  SW-saw,  SC-scrape,  SH- 
shear,  BK-break.  Unlabelled  jagged  lines  represent  breaks.  Not  to  scale,  a) 
Ouis/Capra,  left  tibia,  dorsal  view,  b)  Ovis/Capra,  left  tibia,  plantar  view,  c)  Sus  scrofa, 
left  radius  and  ulna,  lateral  view,  d)  cf.  Sus  scrofa,  left  scapula,  lateral  view,  e) 
Ovis/Capra,  right  scapula,  lateral  view. 


182    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Table  9-4.    Quanhficat 

ion  of  butchery  marks  on  the 

boardinghouse  bones. 

Type  of  Mark 

Number*                    % 

Scrape  (SC) 

10                   7.8 

Cut  (CD 

14                  10.8 

Chop  (CH) 

1                   0.8 

Shears    (SH) 

57                 44.2 

Saw  Marks  (SW) 

47                 36.4 

Total 

129                100.0 

•Multiple  butchery  marks  on  a  single  bone  were  all 
recorded;  only  95  bones  (17.4%  of  TNF)  actually  had 
butchery  marks.  Seventeen  bones  had  two  butchery 
marks,  seven  had  three  butchery  marks,  and  one  had 
four  butchery  marks. 


The  major  purpose  behind  the  concern  with 
recording  butchery  marks  and  butchered 
portions  of  bone  was  to  be  able  to  make 
correlations  between  the  faunal  elements 
represented  in  the  collection  and  specific  cuts  of 
meat.  In  addition  to  recording  individual  marks, 
some  fragments  which  seemed  to  have  been 
butchered  in  a  particular  fashion  were  recorded 
on  line  drawings  of  different  skeletal  elements 
(Figures  9-6,  9-7,  9-8,  and  9-9).  The  small 
sample  size  makes  it  difficult  to  formulate  any 
generalizations  about  butchery  or  specific  cuts 
of  meat,  but  certain  features  can  be  noted  (see 
Lyman  1979  for  comparison  of  butchery 
patterns).  In  Figure  9-6,  three  functionally 
different  manners  of  butchering  the  ribs  seem 
apparent.  Figure  9-6g  and  h  both  include  a 
significant  portion  of  the  body  of  the  rib  with  the 
head,  Figure  9-6b,  c,  d,  and  i  all  show  a  more 
dorsal  separation  of  the  body  of  the  rib  from  the 
head,  and  Figure  9-6a,  e,  and  f  all  show  different 
manners  of  apportioning  the  rib  body.  The  three 
humeri  shown  in  Figure  9-7a,  b,  and  c,  all  show 
different  ways  of  dividing  the  humerus.  In  this 
figure,  c  and  d  both  suggest  the  scale  of  the 
boardinghouse  food  preparation,  as  each 
derives  from  large  roasts  from  the  major  limb 
bones. 

For  the  vertebrae  represented  in  Figure  9-8a, 
b,  and  c  were  all  butchered  in  a  slightly  angled 
dorsal-ventral  manner,  apparently  to  split  the 
vertebra.  The  single  most  common  type  of 
patterned  butchery  was  recorded  for  four 
thoracic  vertebrae  and  is  represented  by  Figure 
9-8d.  In  this  case,  a  dorsal-ventral  pattern  of 
butchery  perpendicular  to  the  vertebral  column 
seems  to  have  been  utilized  to  separate  the 
dorsal  spine  from  the  body  of  the  vertebra. 
Finally,  Figure  9-9c  and  d  are  potentially  related 
butchery  marks,  as  they  would  respectively  be 
the  most  proximal  and  distal  divisions  of  a  pig 


carcass  around  a  shoulder  cut.  Interestingly, 
Figure  9-9d  and  e  both  show  a  similar  cut  of  the 
scapula  across  the  neck  above  the  glenoid  even 
though  one  example  is  from  a  pig  and  the  other 
a  caprid.  While  these  observations  are  based  on 
a  very  small  sample,  they  do  offer  some  insight 
into  butchery  practices  and  seem  to  be 
indicative  of  relatively  regularized  butchery 
patterns. 


Interpretation 

The  small  size  of  this  faunal  sample  makes 
generalizations  difficult  to  make  and  justify.  In 
terms  of  the  overall  dietary  pattern  at  the 
boardinghouses  it  offers  no  real  conclusive 
evidence.  Domestic  mammals  seem  to  have 
provided  the  bulk  of  meat,  with  almost  negligible 
quantities  of  fowl,  fish  or  other  seafood 
represented.  This  probably  relates  not  just  to 
dietary  patterns,  but  also  to  the  survival  of  faunal 
material  as  well  as  the  sampling  procedures.  In 
all  likelihood  microfauna  would  be  recovered 
more  extensively  if  flotation  samples  were 
analyzed,  and  this  might  increase  the  quantity  of 
fish  and  other  small  animal  bones.  It  is  also 
possible  that  the  excavation  emphasis  on 
horizontal  expansion  introduced  sullegic  biases, 
perhaps  missing  richer  faunal  deposits  buried, 
purposely  or  otherwise,  further  beneath  the 
surface.  The  small  sample  size  is  probably 
partially  a  result  of  the  fact  that  trash  was 
collected  from  the  boardinghouses.  It  remains 
unclear  what  disposal  decisions  resulted  in  the 
deposition  of  this  material  on  the  site  or  how  this 
might  have  biased  the  composition  of  the 
sample. 

One  potentially  informative  avenue  of 
interpretation  is  to  try  to  examine  the  fauna  that 
was  recovered  in  terms  of  the  purchasing 
patterns  of  meat  by  correlating  specific 
elements  with  cuts  of  meat  of  documented  price. 
This  has  been  attempted  by  a  number  of 
different  historical  archeologists  in  different 
fashions  and  with  varying  degrees  of  success 
(Henn  1985;  Lyman  1987;  Schulz  and  Gust  1983). 
Schulz  and  Gust  (1983)  compared  the  economic 
rank  (based  on  the  cost  per  pound)  of  beef  cuts 
represented  at  a  number  of  different 
commercial  and  institutional  establishments  in 
Sacramento,  California.  The  major  thrust  of  this 
study  was  to  correlate  faunal  remains  with  socio- 
economic status.  As  Lyman  has  pointed  out,  the 
concept  of  socio-economic  status  they  were 
using  was  ambiguous  and  of  questionable  utility 
(1987:  59).  Further,  Lyman  suggested  that  in 
addition  to  focusing  more  explicitly  on  income 
level  (as  opposed  to  socio-economic  status),  a 


Zooarcheology    183 


MM 


Figure  9-10.  Butchered  portions  of  cow  bones,  a.  left  humerus,  distal  view.  b.  left 
scapula,  distal  view.  c.  left  illium,  caudal  view  (rotated  90°  counterclockwise).  See  also 
Figure  9-7a,  e  and  Figure  9-8e. 


better  measure  of  the  "value"  of  a  cut  of  meat 
would  be  the  cost-efficiency,  or  edible  meat 
yield  per  unit  of  money  expended,  which  does 
not  necessarily  correlate  with  the  "value"  of  a  cut 
as  represented  by  the  cost  (1987:  62).  This  seems 
to  be  a  legitimate  suggestion,  though  not  without 
inherent  problems.  The  interpretation  of  cost- 
efficiency  makes  the  implicit  assumption  that 
the  bones  present  in  a  sample  were  once 
purchased  with  a  given  quantity  of  meat 
attached  to  them,  an  assumption  that  is  never 
really  addressed. 

On  a  slightly  broader  level  of  criticism,  both 
Lyman  and  Schulz  and  Gust  are  misguided  to 
think  that  there  is  necessarily  a  correlation 
between  either  socio-economic  status  or  income 
and  the  purchase  of  cuts  of  meat  of  a  particular 
price  or  cost-efficiency.  To  start  with  relative 
economic  rank,  it  must  be  recognized  that  price 
(on  which  rank  is  based)  is  a  function  of 
aggregate  demand  and  supply.  As  a  result, 
there  is  no  reason  to  believe  that  an  individual 
making  purchases  of  meat  necessarily  values 
the  same  cuts  in  the  same  manner.  A  large 
number  of  other  factors  besides  income  could 
strongly  influence  purchases  including  ethnicity 
and  personal  preference.  Similarly,  income  is 
not  necessarily  correlated  with  the  cost- 
efficiency  of  meat  purchased,  especially  if  it  is 
defined  solely  on  the  basis  of  meat  yield  per  unit 
of  money  spent.  For  example,  a  small  household 
might  make  less  "cost-efficient"  purchases  of 
meat  in  order  to  obtain  smaller  portions,  or 
perhaps  even  for  ease  of  preparation.  In  order 
to  avoid  some  of  these  problems  it  is  necessary 
to  think  of  meat  purchases  in  a  slightly  broader 
framework.  The  market  provides  a  range  of 
potential  opportunities  for  purchases  of  different 


prices.  Within  this  framework,  individuals  make 
their  purchases  based  on  their  own  value  system 
and  the  constraints  imposed  by  their  income.  In 
a  sense  the  focus  should  be  on  looking  at 
purchasing  patterns  with  the  realization  that 
income  is  one  of  many  possible  factors  that 
could  influence  the  pattern  represented. 

With  the  caveats  mentioned  above  in  mind, 
the  cuts  of  meat  represented,  their  economic 
rank,  and  possible  cost-efficiency  are 
summarized  in  Table  9-5.  Since  none  of  the  cuts 
are  represented  by  a  very  large  number  of 
identified  specimens,  it  seemed  unnecessary  to 
try  to  quantify  them  by  minimum  numbers,  as 
some  authors  have  suggested  (e.g.,  Lyman  1987). 

Several  problems  with  this  must  be  pointed 
out.  Identifiability  has  a  very  large  impact  on  the 
potential  for  interpretation.  For  example,  the 
thoracic  vertebrae  and  the  dorsal  ribs  could 
come  from  either  the  relatively  expensive  and 
cost-inefficient  rib  cut  or  from  the  less 
expensive  more  cost  efficient  chuck  cut 
depending  on  their  specific  position  in  the 
carcass,  something  very  difficult  to  determine. 
In  addition,  the  large  quantity  of  long  bone  shaft 
fragments,  rib  fragments,  and  other  bones 
identified  only  to  a  size  category  would  very 
likely  change  the  results  if  they  were  completely 
identified.  Some  of  the  size  3  rib  fragments 
could  easily  be  the  remains  of  mutton  chops,  the 
most  expensive  cut.  These  problems  must  be 
kept  in  mind  as  the  cuts  that  were  identified  are 
discussed  in  more  detail. 

The  initial  historical  research  on 
boardinghouse  foodways  suggested  that  the 
need  for  economization  in  food  purchases 
strongly  influenced  the  purchasing  patterns  of 
the  boardinghouse  keepers  (Landon  1987).   The 


184    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Table  9-5.  Meat  cuts  represented, 

economic  rank, '  and 

cost-efficiency 

rankt  for  the  boardinghouse  bones. 

Economic           Cost-Efficiency 

Body  Part 

Cut 

N1SP 

Rank                    Rank 

Beef§ 

cranium 

head? 

1 

9                            »»tt 

atlas,  cervical  vertebrae 

neck 

3 

8 

thoracic  vertebrae 

chuck/  rib 

4 

5/2                       3/7 

lumbar  vertebrae 

short  loin 

1 

1                           8 

scapula 

chuck 

1 

5                           3 

humerus 

arm 

3 

6                           5 

distal  radius 

foreshank 

1 

9                           6 

illium 

sirloin 

1 

2                           9 

femur  shaft 

round 

1 

3                           4 

dorsal  rib 

chuck/rib 

8 

5/2                       3/7 

ventral  rib 

short/cross  rib 

9tt 

6                           1 

Porktt 

tooth 

head? 

1 

?  (9) 

humerus,  scapula,  radius 

shoulder 

3 

7 

tarsals,  metapodials 

feet 

5 

9 

Mutton§§ 

scapula 

forequarter 

3 

3 

tibia 

leg 

2 

2 

phalanx,  tarsal 

foot /shank 

4 

?  low 

♦Sources:  Landon  1987;  Lyman  1987;  Schulz  and  Gust  1983. 

'Economic  rank  reflects  the  cost  per  pound  as  compared  to  other  cuts  of  the  same  type  of  meat,  with  1  being  the 

highest.  Based  on  Landon  1987  and  Schulz  and  Gust  1983. 

tcost-efficiency  rank  is  based  on  the  amount  of  meat  yield  for  different  cuts  based  on  spending  the  same  amount  of 

money,  with  1  being  the  highest.  Derived  from  information  in  Lyman  1987. 

^Includes  fragments  identified  as  Bos  taurus,  cf.  Bos  taurus,  and  Size  Category  5. 

t+8  of  these  fragments  are  very  small,  pointing  out  one  problem  with  using  NISP. 

"Since  cost-efficiency  is  meat  yield  per  unit  of  expenditure  the  beef  cuts  without  cost-efficiency  ranks  can  be  thought 

of  as  follows:   head  -  low  yield,  low  cost  and  neck  -  moderate  yield,  low  cost.   No  cost-efficiency  ranks  are  avaiable 

for  pork  cuts.   Since  cost-efficiency  is  meat  yield  per  unit  of  expenditure  the  pork  cuts  can  be  thought  of  as  follows: 

head  and  feet  -  low  yield,  low  cost  and  shoulder  -  high  yield,  moderately  low  cost.    No  cost-efficiency  ranks  are 

available  for  mutton  cuts.  Since  cost-efficiency  is  meat  yield  per  unit  of  expenditure  the  mutton  cuts  can  be  thought  of 

as  follows:  forequarter  -  moderately  high  yield,  moderately  low  cost;  leg  -  high  yield,  moderately  high  cost;  and 

foot/shank  -  low  yield,  low  cost. 

ttlncludes  fragments  identified  as  Sus  scrofa  and  cf.  Sus  scrofa. 

SSlncludes  fragments  identified  as  Ovis/Capra  and  cf.  Ovis/Capra. 


livelihood  of  the  keeper  depended  on  meeting 
expenses  with  the  board  fees  which  were  paid, 
and  any  residual  was  the  keeper's  profit.  This 
would  provide  a  reasonably  strong  incentive  to 
economize  in  the  purchase  of  food,  including 
meat.  At  the  same  time,  there  was  a  certain 
pressure  from  the  boarders  to  provide 
acceptable  fare.  Historical  accounts  seem  to 
indicate  that  the  quality  of  the  food  was  not  so 
much  at  issue  as  the  quantity  (Landon  1987). 
Taken  together  these  features  would  suggest 
that  meat  purchases  should  be  dominated  by 
medium  or  lower  price  cuts  that  are  medium  to 
highly  cost-efficient. 

A  number  of  the  cuts  do  seem  to  fit  into  this 
pattern.  Relatively  inexpensive  and  very  cost- 
efficient  cuts  are  represented  by  the  short/cross 
rib    of   beef    and    probably    by    the    mutton 


forequarter  and  pork  shoulder  as  well.  There  are 
also  a  number  of  middle  price  range  cuts  that 
are  of  medium  cost-efficiency,  such  as  the  beef 
chuck,  arm,  and  round.  Leg  of  mutton  would 
probably  also  fall  into  this  category  as  it  is  a 
high-yield  cut  of  relatively  moderate  price.  At 
the  same  time,  however,  the  pattern  of  cuts 
represented  actually  seems  to  be  considerably 
more  eclectic  and  varied  than  might  be 
anticipated  from  the  constraints  described 
above.  For  example,  relatively  expensive  and 
cost-inefficient  cuts  are  represented  by  the  beef 
short  loin,  sirloin,  and  possibly  the  rib  cut.  At  the 
other  end  of  the  spectrum,  some  relatively 
cheap  cuts  of  uncertain  or  moderately  low  cost- 
efficiency  are  also  present,  such  as  the  pig  and 
sheep  feet,  beef  neck  and  foreshank,  and  head 
of  beef  and  pig. 


Zooarcheology  185 


The  sample  is  quite  small  and  analysis  of  more 
faunal  material  would  unquestionably  help  in 
the  formulation  of  a  better  view  of  purchasing 
patterns.  It  is  also  important  to  realize  that  the 
relationship  between  the  actual  meat 
purchasing  pattern  and  the  pattern  of  faunal 
remains  recovered  is  very  tenuous  as  there  are  a 
large  number  of  factors  that  could  cause  a  great 
deal  of  variation  between  these  two  patterns. 
Nonetheless,  it  does  seem  clear  that  the  factors 
that  influenced  the  meat  purchasing  pattern 
which  resulted  in  these  remains  are  more 
complex  and  multifaceted  than  simply  the 
relative  cost  or  cost-efficiency  of  particular  cuts. 
A  variety  of  factors  might  have  influenced  the 
purchasing  patterns  of  the  boardinghouse 
keeper  and  it  is  even  possible  that  the  boarders 
themselves  might  have  had  a  significant  say  in 
the  choice  of  foods,  a  situation  that  has  been 
documented  for  some  other  boarding  operations 
(Byington  1910: 139). 


Conclusions 

Analysis  of  this  faunal  assemblage  from  the 
Boott  Mill's  boardinghouses  offers  interesting 
insight  into  several  issues.  The  presence  of  a 
large  number  of  rat  bones  and  a  large  number  of 
bones  with  evident  rodent  gnaw  marks  adds 
some  texture  to  the  understanding  of  living 
conditions  in  the  boardinghouses.  The  bulk  of 
the  meat  diet  was  derived  from  domestic 
animals  and  generally  coincides  with  historical 
documentation  of  boardinghouse  diet.  By 
looking  at  the  pattern  of  cuts  of  meat 
represented,  it  becomes  clear  that  a  variety  of 
different  cuts  were  being  purchased,  and  that 
they  displayed  a  great  deal  of  variation  in  their 
relative  price  and  cost-efficiency.  This  is 
informative  because  it  suggests  some  of  the 
complexity  that  went  into  decisions  about  food 
purchase  and  food  preparation  in  the 
boardinghouses  even  within  a  context  supplying 
strong  pressures  for  economization.  Further,  it 
suggests  that  a  worthwhile  area  for  more 
research  would  be  to  define  in  greater  detail  the 
factors  other  than  economic  constraint  that 
influence  food  purchasing  decisions  of  people  in 
19th-century  Lowell. 


186   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  life 


Chapter  10 

DESCRIPTIVE  ANALYSIS  OF  TOBACCO-RELATED  MATERIAL 
FROM  THE  BOOTT  MILLS  BOARDINGHOUSES 

by  Lauren  J.  Cook 


Introduction 

In  the  discussion  that  follows,  the  clay  pipe 
fragments  are  divided  into  four  categories:  stem 
fragments;  mouthpieces;  bowls  and  bowl 
fragments;  and  heels.  When  the  materials  from 
Operations  A  and  B  were  compared,  no 
patterned  differences  could  be  discerned 
between  them,  except  that  there  was  much  more 
material  from  Operation  B.  Expected 
differences  were  in  the  age  of  the  material  (as 
represented  by  the  use  of  the  country  name 
rather  than  the  city  name),  in  the  percentage  of 
stem  fragments  with  makers'  marks,  and  in  the 
percentages  of  different  mouthpiece  treatments 
between  the  two  operations.  Chi-square 
statistics  performed  in  these  three  areas 
indicated  that  there  was  no  significant  difference 
between  the  two  operations.  Therefore,  to  avoid 
needless  repetition,  the  collection  is  described 
here  as  a  unit.  Where  applicable,  contexts  of 
particularly  significant  objects  are  given. 

This  chapter  presents  archeological 
information  on  the  boardinghouse  tobacco- 
related  material  as  well  as  limited  discussion  of 
its  contribution  to  the  archeology  of  the  site.  The 
social  implications  of  the  material  are  discussed 
in  Chapter  11. 

Nomenclature  follows  standard  practices 
among  tobacco  pipe  researchers.  Figure  10-1 
illustrates  the  location  of  pipe  features  that  are 
discussed  in  the  text.  The  plastic  stems  are 
described  using  terms  found  in  modern 
tobacconists'  literature  (Weber  1965:  100-104). 
In  all  cases,  the  orientation  of  all  pipe 
components  is  considered  to  be  as  if  they  were 
on  a  pipe  in  the  reader's  mouth.  For  example, 
the  left  side  of  the  pipe  would  be  on  the  smoker's 
left,  etc.  (Figure  10—1  shows  the  left  side  of  a 
hypothetical  pipe). 


Stems  (183) 

Unmarked  stems  (88) 

Eighty-eight  unmarked  stem  fragments  were 
recovered  during  excavations  at  the 
boardinghouses.  This  number  does  not  include 
unmarked  mouthpiece  fragments,  which  are 
discussed  separately  below. 


Marked  Stems  (95) 

Thomas  Davidson,  Jr.,  and  Company  [1863-1910]  (3) 

Three  stem  fragments  marked  Davidson/ 
Glasgow  were  recovered — one  from  Trench  2 
and  two  from  Operation  B  (Figure  10-2).  These 
pipes  were  apparently  manufactured  by  Thomas 
Davidson,  Jr.,  and  Company,  a  Glasgow  firm  that 
was  in  operation  between  1863  and  1910  (Walker 
1977:  1010-1011).  The  fact  that  all  three  of  the 
Davidson  stems  in  the  Boott  Mills  collection  are 
impressed  Glasgow  indicates  that  Davidson 
pipes  were  reaching  Lowell  before  1891,  but  not 
after  that  date.  One  of  the  fragments  bears  the 
stamped  mold  number  "345,"  which 
corresponds  to  the  "Light  T.D."  in  Davidson's 
line  of  pipe  models  (ATPM  1900:  43). 


Duncan  McDougall  and  Company  [1847-1968]  (51) 

Four  pipe  stems  marked  McDougall/ 
GLASGOW  were  recovered,  all  from  Trench  2  and 
Operation  B.  One  example,  with  embossed 
cartouches  around  the  names  of  the  company 
and  city,  bore  a  mold  number,  either  "11"  or 
"111."  On  the  basis  of  the  list  from  the  1870s,  this 
pipe  would  be  either  an  "H.  C.  African"  or  a 
"Small  Fairy"  (McDougall  and  Co.,  n.d.;  Figure 
10-3). 

Forty-three  examples  marked  McDougall/ 
Scotland  are  present  in  the  collection.  The 
latter  stems  were  recovered  from  contexts  across 
the  site,  and  assisted  in  dating  the  features  in 
which  they  were  found  to  post-1 891  .Three  stem 
fragments  could  be  attributed  to  the  company, 
but  whether  they  bore  the  name  of  the  city  or  the 
country  could  not  be  determined.  Mold 
numbers  on  the  McDougall  stems  included 
"326,"  which  was  listed  in  1900  as  a  'Thin  T.D." 
(ATPM  1900:  14).  The  McDougall  firm  survived 
into  the  late  1960s  and  was  the  last  of  the  major 
Glasgow  pipe  manufacturers  to  go  out  of 
business. 


William  White  and  Son  [1805-1955]  (12) 

Eight  examples  marked  W.  White/Glasgow 
are  present  in  the  collection.  Mold  numbers  on 
these  examples  include  "T78"  (Figure  10-4)  and 


187 


188    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


BOWL 


FRONT 


HEEL 


STEM 


MOUTHPIECE 


Figure  10-1.  The  parts  of  a  pipe. 


Figure  10-2.  "Davidson/Glasgow"  pipestem  fragment.  Made  by  Thomas  Davidson  & 
Co.,  Glasgow,  1863-1891. 


Tobacco-Related  Material     189 


Figure  10-3.  McDougall/Scotland  pipe.  Made  by  McDougall  &  Co.,  Glasgow. 


Figure  10-4.   "W.  White/Glasgow"  pipestem  fragment.   Made  byWilliam  White  &  Son, 
Glasgow,  1805-1891. 


190    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


"78W."  Both  of  these  are  apparently  variations 
of  mold  number  "78,"  which  was  described  in 
1900  as  a  "Small  Plain  T.D."  (ATPM  1900:  19).  In 
all  cases  the  numbers  are  apparently  embossed. 
One  barely  legible  example  with  the  mold 
number  "78"  has  a  portion  of  the  bowl  intact. 
The  back  of  the  bowl  has  the  initials  "TD" 
impressed  within  raised  circles.  This  particular 
pipe  had  been  subject  to  such  heavy  use  that  the 
lettering  was  so  worn  as  to  be  barely  legible,  and 
the  mouthpiece,  a  broken  surface  only  5.6  cm. 
from  the  back  of  the  bowl,  shows  very  heavy 
tooth-wear  (Figure  10-5).  Several  of  the 
White/Glasgow  fragments  in  the  collection,  with 
the  mold  number  "T78"  also  have  embossed 
numbers  on  the  heels.  One  example  reads 
"1"/"G,"  and  the  other  "l"/"9." 

Three  stem  fragments  marked  W.  WHITE/ 
Scotland  were  also  recovered.  One  of  these 
bears  the  mold  number  "T78,"  indicating  that 
this  pipe  model  was  in  production  both  before 
and  after  1891. 

One  stem  fragment  is  attributable  to  the 
company,  but  the  name  of  the  city  or  country  is 
missing.  This  fragment  also  is  embossed  with 
the  mold  number  "T78." 


John  Waldie  and  Company  [1870-1929]  (1) 

A  single  fragment,  marked  "...DIE  &  Co."/ 
"GLA[SGOW]"  was  recovered  from  Operation 
B.  The  names  of  company  and  city  are  bordered 
by  cartouches,  with  lozenges  at  the  ends  (Figure 
10-6).  The  only  known  Glasgow  pipe  maker 
whose  surname  ended  in  the  letters  DIE  was 
John  Waldie  (Walker  1977:  1029-1030). 


GLASGOW  stem  fragments  (2) 

Two  fragments  with  the  manufacturer's  name 
missing,  but  with  all  or  part  of  the  word  Glasgow 
were  present  in  the  collection.  In  both  cases,  the 
stem  may  originally  have  had  the  maker's  name 
on  it.  No  mold  numbers  were  present  that  might 
have  permitted  even  a  provisional  attribution  of 
these  stem  fragments  to  a  particular 
manufacturer. 


SCOTLAND  stem  fragments  (8) 

Seven  stem  fragments  had  the  name  of  their 
country  of  manufacture — Scotland — on  their 
right  sides,  but  had  the  name  of  the  maker 
broken  off  or  missing.  Two  of  these  bore  the 
mold  number  "326."  Although  by  1900  most  of 
the  Scottish  pipe  makers  manufactured  models 
with  this  number,  the  evidence  of  the  marked 


pipes  from  this  collection  indicates  that  these 
two  examples  were  probably  made  by  Duncan 
McDougall  and  Company  (see  above),  whose 
model  326  was  a  'Thin  T.D."  (ATPM  1900: 14). 

One  example  was  marked  Scotland,  but  with 
an  illegible  maker's  mark  or  mold  number  on 
the  left  side.  The  fact  that  the  former  was 
impressed  and  the  latter  apparently  embossed 
indicates  that  the  illegible  portion  was  probably 
a  mold  number. 


Stem  fragments  with  mold  numbers  (12) 

A  total  of  12  stem  fragments  bore  what 
appeared  to  be  mold  numbers,  without  the 
name  of  the  maker  or  the  place  of  manufacture. 
Eight  of  these  were  marked  "326"  (two 
embossed,  six  stamped  or  impressed).  As 
mentioned  above,  these  are  most  likely  to  be 
McDougall's  'Thin  T.D."  (ATPM  1900:  14). 

Two  fragments  were  embossed  with  variations 
of  "78"  (one  "T78,"  one  "78S").  These  are 
apparently  variations  on  William  White's 
"Small  Plain  T.D."  (ATPM  1900: 19). 

One  stem  fragment  bore  the  impressed 
number  "111"  on  its  left  side,  with  the 
beginnings  of  a  "rope  frame"  immediately  to  its 
left.  Similar  frames  were  used  by  the  major 
Scottish. pipe  makers  as  decorative  borders  for 
their  names  and  the  names  of  the  cities  in  which 
they  were  located  (cf.  Gallagher  1987:  fig. 12:2, 
13:6;  Gallagher  and  Price  1987:  fig.l). 

German  stem  fragments  (3) 

Three  pipe  stems  marked  with  all  or  part  of 
the  country  name  GERMANY  were  recovered. 
Two  of  these  (T2/9d  and  21 N  0W/1)  had  the 
name  impressed,  probably  imparted  by  the 
mold  with  which  they  were  made  (Figure  10-7), 
while  the  third  (19N  2W/1)  had  the  name 
embossed  in  serif  letters.  In  each  case,  the 
country  name  was  on  the  left  side  of  the  stem, 
and  none  of  the  examples  exhibited  the  maker's 
name.  One  example  (T2/9d)  had  a  small  portion 
of  the  bowl  left,  with  a  cylindrical,  peglike  heel. 
The  fact  that  the  country  name  is  present,  and  in 
English  at  that,  indicates  that  these  pipes  were 
made  after  1891,  for  the  export  market. 


Dutch  stem  fragment  (1) 

One  stem  fragment  (T2b/9c)  bore  the 
embossed  lettering,  GOUDA/HOLLAND,  in  serif 
letters  (Figure  10-8).  Again,  as  with  the  German 
stems  mentioned  above,  the  fact  that  the 
country  name  is  present  in  English  indicates  that 


Tobacco-Related  Material     191 


Figure  10-5.  William  White  &  Son  "Small  Plain  T.D."  pipe  fragment.  This  badly  worn 
example  bears  the  mold  number  "78,"  and  was  smoked  after  the  stem  was  broken  off. 


Figure  10-6.  John  Waldie  &  Co.  pipestem  fragment,  made  in  Glasgow,  1870-1891. 


192    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  10-7.  German  pipestem  fragment,  post-1891. 


Figure  10-8.  "Gouda /Holland"  pipestem  fragment,  post-1891. 


Tobacco-Related  Material     193 


this  pipe  was  made  after  1891  for  the  export 
trade. 


Boston  stem  fragment  (1) 

One  embossed  stem  fragment  reading  "S.T.& 
C."/  "BOSTON"  was  recovered  from  T4E/4 
(Figure  10-9).  This  is  apparently  not  a  maker's 
mark,  as  no  maker  with  those  initials  is  either 
documented  in  the  city  directories  or  other 
sources  (Calver  1950:  289;  Sudbury  1979:  165- 
166).  Rather,  the  mark  was  apparently  that  of 
Stephen  Tilton  and  Company,  wholesale 
tobacconists,  who  did  business  in  Boston 
between  1840  and  1904  (Boston  City  Directories). 
Tilton  apparently  commissioned  pipes  with  the 
name  of  his  company  on  them.  McDougall  of 
Glasgow,  for  example,  offered  "pipes  stamped 
with  name  on  bowl  or  stem  2d  per  gross  extra" — 
presumably  the  name  of  the  person  ordering 
them  (McDougall  and  Company  n.d.).  In  the 
case  of  the  Tilton  stem  fragment,  the  source  was 
probably  closer  to  home.  The  decorative  border 
around  the  lettering — three  hollow  circles, 
connected  by  lines  along  the  top  and  bottom — 
resembles  borders  on  pipes  made  by 
Bannerman  and  Company  of  Montreal  (e.g., 
Sudbury  1980a:  8).  Bannerman  made  pipes  in 
Montreal  between  1858  and  1907,  and  operated 
an  American  factory,  at  Rouse's  Point,  New  York, 
between  1875  and  1884  (ibid.:  4-5).  The  Rouse's 
Point  factory  apparently  enabled  Bannerman  to 
avoid  paying  duty  on  the  products  of  his 
Montreal  factory. 

The  Tilton  stem  fragment  was  clearly  made 
between  1840  and  1904 — the  documented 
timespan  of  Tilton's  company.  The  stem's 
extremely  large  bore  diameter— -6/64" — is  of  no 
use  in  narrowing  this  date,  as  stem  bores  of 
various  sizes  were  in  use  at  any  given  time 
(Harrington  1954).  If  the  pipe  was  made  by 
Bannerman,  it  would  have  to  have  been  made 
after  1858.  Although  it  is  tempting  to  point  to  the 
quality  of  the  lettering  as  indicating  an  early 
date,  the  lettering  on  the  post  1891 
Gouda/Holland  example  described  above  is  at 
least  as  skillfully  executed.  Although  a  close 
date  for  the  stem  fragment  is  not  forthcoming, 
its  presence  indicates  that  Tilton's  wares, 
presumably  tobacco  as  well  as  pipes,  were 
traded  to  Lowell  from  Boston. 


two  dots,  separated  into  horizontal  registers  by 
embossed  rings.  At  one  end,  the  geometric 
design  is  replaced  by  horizontal  ribbing, 
indicating  that  this  example  had  a  bowl  that  was 
at  least  partially  ribbed  (Figure  10-10).  Such 
geometric  designs  are  reminiscent  of  the 
decorated  stems  of  the  French  pipemaker  Peter 
Dorni,  although  no  exact  parallels  to  this  design 
are  present  either  among  Dorni's  work,  or  that  of 
his  many  imitators  (Cf.  Omwake  1965:  fig.le,f; 
Reid  1976:  fig.6:Sl).  A  similar,  but  not  identical 
example  was  excavated  from  the  site  of  a 
military  barracks  at  Port  Arthur,  Tasmania  Qack 
1986:  fig.5g). 


Other  marked  stems  (5) 

One  stem  fragment  is  marked  with  "S..."  on 
the  right  side,  so  far  forward  that  it  is  practically 
on  the  bowl.  The  lettering  is  embossed,  and  is 
too  far  forward  to  be  part  of  the  country  name 
(i.e.,  "Scotland"). ..The  other  four  marked  stems 
are  completely  illegible  through  various 
combinations  of  poor  marking,  worn  markings, 
and  breakage. 


Mouthpieces    (48) 

Forty-eight  mouthpiece  fragments  are  present 
in  the  collection.1  These  were  catalogued 
according  to  a  classification  scheme  proposed 
by  Michael  A.  Pfeiffer  (1978:  Fig.  Pi-1;  1982:  124- 
125)  after  Cal  Richie,  modified  of  course  to  suit 
the  requirements  of  the  present  sample.  Three 
of  the  types  defined  by  Pfeiffer  are  present  in  the 
Boott  Mills  Boardinghouse  collection;  tapered 
mouthpieces  (Figure  10-11);  flat  mouthpieces, 
on  which  the  end  appears  rectilinear  when 
viewed  from  the  side;  lipped  mouthpieces,  which 
have  a  lip  on  the  end,  enabling  a  better  grip  with 
the  teeth  (Figure  10-12).  Two  mouthpiece  types 
that  are  not  encompassed  by  Pfeiffer's  typology 
are  present  in  the  collection.  The  first  of  these 
(represented  by  only  one  example)  is  a  lipped 
mouthpiece  that  has  been  flattened  laterally  in 
front  of  the  lip,  ensuring  that  the  pipe  will  face 
upwards  when  the  stem  is  gripped  between  the 
teeth.  The  second  type  consists  of  "broken" 
mouthpieces,  where  a  portion  of  the  stem  has 
been  broken  off,  and  the  remaining  portion  used 
as  a  mouthpiece.  Unlike  the  other  types,  broken 


Geometrically  embossed  stem  fragment  (1) 

An  interesting  embossed  stem  fragment  was 
recovered  from  2N  8W/3.  The  fragment,  several 
centimeters  long,  is  decorated  with  a  geometric 
pattern  consisting  of  alternating  rows  of  one  and 


Five  of  these  mouthpieces  contain  other  more 
important  elements,  such  as  bowls  or  maker's  marks, 
and  are  discussed  at  length  and  are  counted  elsewhere 
in  this  chapter  under  those  elements. 


194    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


*«=^  "'•jr.-  i  ^-7,..VTTTtt.iXJlMi,l',lTaBJ^ 


Figure  10-9.  "S.T.&C./Boston"  pip>estem  fragment,  apparently  produced  for  Stephen 
Tilton  &  Co.  of  Boston,  wholesale  tobacconists,  1840-1904.  Not  to  scale.  (Drawing  by 
Lauren  J.  Cook.) 


Figure  10-10.   Geometrically  embossed  pipestem  fragment. 


Tobacco-Related  Material     195 


Figure  10-11.  Tapered  mouthpiece. 


■  ■  *■  •    <  - 


Figure  10-12.  Lipped  mouthpiece. 


196    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  10-13.  Broken  mouthpiece  showing  tooth  wear. 


Figure  10-14.   Whittled  mouthpiece. 


Tobacco-Related  Material     197 


Figure  10-15.  Left,  "Apple  shape  pipe  bowl  fragment,  impressed  "IF..."  or  "IR..."  on  bowl 
back.  Right,  "Woodstock  shape"  pipe  bowl,  maker  unknown. 


Figure  10-16.  "Home  Rule"  pipe  bowl  fragment.  Maker  unknown,  but  possibly  R. 
Bannerman,  Rouse's  Point,  N.Y.,  or  Thomas  Davidson,  Glasgow.    Not  to  scale. 
(Drawing  by  Lauren  J.  Cook.) 


198    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Table  10-1.  Modification  of  mouthpieces,  all  contexts. 


Lipped/ 

Tapered 

Flat 

Lipped 

Flattened 

Broken 

Total 

Unmodified 

17 

8 

2 

1 

» 

28 

Tooth  wear 

2 

2 

2 

0 

9 

15 

Grinding 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3 

3 

Whittling  & 

Grinding 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

Whittling  & 

Tooth  wear 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

Total 

19 

10 

4 

1 

14 

48 

There  were  195  unmodified  broken  stem  fragments,  but  it  is  unreasonable  to  assume  that  any  but  a 
small  percentage  of  these  ever  functioned  as  mouthpieces. 


mouthpieces  are  recognizable  only  when  they 
are  modified  by  the  smoker. 

Several  types  of  modifications  were  noted  on 
the  mouthpieces  in  the  collection.  Sixteen 
mouthpieces  bore  some  evidence  of  tooth  wear, 
which  in  some  cases  was  extreme  (Figure  10-13). 
Four  examples  gave  indications  of  some  form  of 
grinding,  and  two  mouthpieces  were  carved  or 
whittled  to  provide  a  more  satisfactory  purchase 
for  the  smoker's  teeth  or  gums  (Figure  10-14). 
Nearly  60%  of  the  mouthpieces  in  the  collection 
were  unmodified.  Table  10-1  shows  the  number 
of  mouthpieces  of  each  type,  and  the  ways  in 
which  they  were  modified. 

Mouthpiece  modifications  are  significant 
because  they  offer  information  on  smoking 
behavior.  Tapered  and  flat  mouthpieces  tended 
to  occur  on  the  popular  "T.D."  models  (cf. 
American  Clay  Pipe  Works  1988:  16).  The  fact 
that  so  few  of  the  mouthpieces  of  this  type  in  the 
collection  exhibit  visible  tooth  wear  indicates 
that  many  of  them  were  broken  off  before  use. 
This  conclusion  is  supported  by  the  relatively 
large  number  of  broken  ends  of  stem  fragments 
that  show  either  such  wear,  or  more  conscious 
modification  such  as  grinding  or  whittling. 
These  were  the  new  mouthpieces  that  were 
formed  after  the  original  ones  were  broken  off. 

The  very  small  sample  of  more  elaborately 
finished  lipped  mouthpieces  is  problematic. 
These  were  no  doubt  more  likely  to  be  applied 
by  the  manufacturer  to  models  that  were 
considered  less  likely  to  have  their  mouthpieces 
broken  off.  It  is  possible  that  the  several 
examples  of  this  type  were  from  pipes  that  were 
broken  before  seeing  use,  although  it  is 
noteworthy  that  the  American  Clay  Pipe  Works 
offered  to  supply  "rubber  sleeves"  for  such  pipes 
"at  an  advance  of  25  cents  per  gross"  over  the 
wholesale  cost  (American  Clay  Pipe  Works  1988: 
14).   These  were  elastic  bands  that  encircled  the 


mouthpiece  above  the  lip,  and  that  were 
apparently  intended  to  prevent  the  smoker's 
teeth  from  touching  the  stem.  These  almost 
certainly  would  have  affected  the  degree  of  tooth 
wear  on  mouthpieces,  but  it  is  not  known 
whether  they  were  in  common  use. 

The  extent  of  modification  on  the 
mouthpieces  in  the  collection  implies  an  active 
preference  for  short  clay  pipes,  to  the  extent  that 
pipes  were  broken  off  until  they  were  sufficiently 
short.  The  social  and  symbolic  ramifications  of 
this  behavior  are  discussed  at  length  in  Chapter 
11. 


Bowls 

Undecorated  bowl  fragments  (155) 

Six  of  these  fragments  mend  with  one  another, 
to  form  two  partial  bowls.  Two  of  the  unmarked 
bowl  fragments  in  the  collection  have  heels,  also 
unmarked. 


"Woodstock"  bowl  fragments  (3) 

These  fragments,  which  mend  to  form  two 
pipe  bowls,  are  in  the  popular  "Woodstock 
shape."  This  shape  is  noted  for  thick-walled 
bowls,  and  for  thick  stems,  as  the  examples  in 
the  collection  show  (Figure  10-15,  right).  These 
pipes  both  have  7/64"  bore  diameters,  which  are 
the  widest  in  the  collection,  and  it  is  very  possible 
that  this  type  generally  had  wider  diameters  at 
any  given  date  than  the  range  of  diameters  in 
other  styles. 


TD  Bowls  (17) 

Seventeen  complete  or  nearly  complete  bowls, 
with  the  letters  TD  marked  on  the  back  of  the 


Tobacco-Related  Material     199 


bowl,  are  present  in  the  collection.  One  of  these, 
a  W.  White  pipe,  has  the  mold  number  78  on  it  . 
Any  mold  numbers  that  may  have  been  present 
on  the  other  examples  were  broken  off  with  the 
stems.  As  mentioned  above,  W.  White's  model 
78  was  a  "Small  Plain  T.D."  (ATPM  1900:  19). 
Unfortunately,  none  of  the  the  rim  on  this  pipe  is 
present,  making  measurement  difficult.  The 
lettering  on  this  example  is  impressed  in  raised 
circles.  The  remaining  16  bowls  have  embossed 
lettering. 

Ten  of  these  bowls  have  unmarked  heels.  The 
heel  of  one  example  is  marked  with  an 
embossed  horseshoe  on  each  side.  Another  is 
marked  with  an  embossed  design  similar  to  a 
quotation  mark  joined  at  the  bottom,  and  a  third 
is  marked  with  an  embossed  isosceles  triangle. 
The  heels  on  the  four  remaining  bowls  are 
broken  off. 


TD  Bowl  fragments  (28) 

Four  of  these  fragments  mend  into  one.  There 
are  14  "T"s,  nine  "D"s,  and  two  "TD"s.  One  "T" 
and  one  "D"  are  surrounded  by  a  border  of 
radiating  dashes,  but  these  do  not  mend  with 
one  another,  and  clearly  represent  two  separate 
pipes.  There  are  therefore  18  separate  TD  pipes 
represented  in  these  fragments.  Two  of  the  "T"s 
are  impressed,  while  all  of  the  other  examples 
are  embossed. 


"Home  Rule"  Bowls  (2) 

Two  bowls  that  apparently  bore  the  Irish 
nationalist  slogan  "Home  Rule"  are  present  in 
the  collection.  The  first,  and  most  complete  of 
these,  is  rouletted  below  the  rim,  with  the 
rouletting  smeared  at  the  rim  as  though  hastily 
done.  An  impressed  oval  on  the  back  of  the  bowl 
contains  the  partial  words  "...ME"  and  "...ULE" 
one  above  the  other  (Figure  10-16).  The  second 
example  is  nearly  identical,  except  that  all  of  the 
inscription  except  the  "...E"  at  the  end  of  the 
word  "home"  is  missing. 

Most  of  the  major  Scottish  pipemakers  made 
"Home  Rule"  pipes,  as  did  Bannerman's  factory 
at  Rouses  point,  New  York  (ATPM  1900;  Sudbury 
1980a:  13).  The  examples  in  the  collection  bear 
very  strong  resemblance  to  a  catalogue 
illustration  of  Thomas  Davidson's  model  174 
("Home  Rule"),  in  that  the  rouletting  is  below 
the  rim  and  the  lettering  is  in  an  oval  on  the  back 
of  the  bowl  (Gallagher  and  Price  1987:  132).  The 
Davidson  pipe  has  a  stem  of  about  three  inches 
in  length  and  no  heel,  while  the  Bannerman 
examples  have  heels,  and   larger  impressed 


ovals  and  lettering  than  the  pipes  in  the  Lowell 
collection  (Sudbury  1979:  Plate  6,  numbers  3-4). 


"Dhudeen"  Bowls  (2) 

Two  fragments  of  bowl  backs  that  bore  the 
word  "Dhudeen,"  the  Gaelic  term  for  a  short 
clay  pipe,  were  recovered  during  the 
excavations.  The  first  of  these  is  an  entire  bowl 
back,  with  a  bore  diameter  of  5/64",  and  the  word 
"DHUDEEN"  impressed  in  a  rectangle  about  1 
cm.  below  the  rim  (Figure  10-17).  The  letters 
"DHU"  fall  to  the  left  of  the  seam,  while  the 
letters  "deen"  fall  to  the  right  of  it.  The  pipe  has 
an  unmarked  heel,  and  appears  to  be  unused. 
The  fabric  may  be  tan  clay,  although  rust  stains 
on  part  of  the  fragment  indicate  that  it  may  have 
become  discolored  in  the  ground.  The  second 
example  is  a  rim  fragment,  and  is  similar  to  the 
first,  although  only  "D...DEE..."  is  legible. 


"Wolf  Tone"  Bowl  (1) 

Three  fragments  mend  to  form  a  single  bowl 
with  the  words  "tone"  on  the  left  side,  "ERIN"  on 
the  right  side  (Figures  10-18,  10-19).  Other 
decoration  includes  shamrocks  on  both  sides  of 
the  bowl,  and  a  wavy  foliate  decoration  on  the 
seams.  An  illustrated  example  of  a  more 
complete  specimen  recovered  in  Glasgow 
indicates  that  the  Lowell  example  originally  bore 
the  legend  "wolf"/ "98" /"TONE,"  in  descending 
order  on  its  left  side,  and  a  harp  on  its  right  side 
(Gallagher     1987:      fig. 24).  The     pipe 

commemorates  the  Irish  patriot  Wolf  Tone,  who 
was  captured  and  executed  by  the  British  in 
1798 — it  is  a  reasonable  supposition  that  the 
pipe  was  produced  to  mark  the  centennial  of 
Tone's  death. 


Nautical  motif  bowl  fragments  (2) 

Two  bowl  fragments,  which  do  not  mend, 
apparently  depict  nautical  scenes.  One  of  these 
(Figure  10-20)  is  embossed  with  what  appears  to 
be  part  of  the  hull  of  a  warship  or  whaler  with 
gunports,  waves,  and  the  embossed  letters 
"...BIA."  The  other  fragment  shows  a  gaff-rigged 
mainsail  (or  mizzen  spanker)  and  topsail,  of  a 
vessel  that  is  clearly  facing  to  the  right.  Although 
the  two  fragments  do  not  mend,  the  hull  portions 
on  both  are  very  similar,  indicating  that  they 
may  be  from  the  same  model  of  pipe,  or  even 
from  different  sides  of  the  same  pipe. 


200    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  10-17.  "Dhudeen"  pipe  bowl  fragment,  maker  unknown. 


Figure  10-18.  "Wolf  Tone"  pipe  bowl,  side  views.    Not  to  scale.  (Drawing  by  Lauren  J. 
Cook.) 


Tobacco-Related  Material     201 


Figure  10-19.  "Wolf  Tone"  pipe  bowl,  showing  front  seam. 


Figure  10-20.  Nautical  motif  pipe  bowl  fragment.  Not  to  scale.  (Drawing  by  Lauren  J. 
Cook.) 


202    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Fluted  bowl  fragments  (4) 

Two  rim  fragments  from  fluted  bowls  were 
recovered.  One  of  these  is  a  bowl  front  with  a 
poorly  finished  foliate  front  seam  (Figure  10-21). 
The  interior  of  the  bowl  shows  no  signs  of  use. 
Although  no  archeologically  recovered 
examples  with  both  fluting  and  floral  seams 
have  come  to  the  author's  attention,  A  Thomas 
Davidson,  Jr.  &  Co.  catalogue  illustrates  two — 
one  as  model  number  2  ("R  Head")  and  the 
other  as  model  number  248  ("C[arvedJ  Hunter") 
(Gallagher  and  Price  1987:  figs.  17,  22;  ATPM 
1900:  34,  40).  A  second  rim  fragment  does  not 
have  the  front  seam  present  and  shows  evidence 
of  moderate  to  heavy  use  but  is  otherwise  similar 
to  that  described  above. 

A  third  fluted  bowl  fragment  shows  signs  of 
very  heavy  use,  and  contains  tobacco  remains. 
Of  the  two  flutes  present  on  this  fragment,  the 
one  that  was  apparently  closer  to  the  front  of  the 
bowl  has  been  milled  diagonally  by  hand  after 
the  pipe  was  removed  from  the  mold. 

The  final  fluted  example  is  a  bowl  base  with  a 
broken  heel  Figure  10-22).  The  flutes  are  broad 
and  end  about  1.6  cm.  above  the  base.  It  would 
appear  that  the  fluting  was  interrupted  partway 
up  the  bowl  and  either  continued  to  the  rim  after 
the  interruption,  or  was  replaced  by  another 
design.  Partially  fluted  bowls  are  widely  known 
from  the  literature,  and  were  made  by  major 
export  firms  such  as  McDougal  and  Davidson 
(see  Gallagher  1987:  fig.14,  no.  14;  Gallagher  and 
Price  1987:  fig.22).  The  catalogue  illustrations  of 
the  Davidson  examples  indicate  that  they  were 
variations  on  model  number  6,  "Carved  English" 
(ATPM  1900:  34).  It  would  appear  that  pipes  with 
fluted  bowls  fell  within  a  more  inclusive  category 
of  "carved"  pipes. 


the  Lowell  collection  is  a  red  clay  pipe  bowl 
recovered  from  Fort  Custer,  Montana,  which  is 
almost  exactly  twice  its  size  (Wilson  1971:  fig.14). 


Armorial  bowl  fragment  (1) 

One  bowl  rim  fragment  with  an  unidentified 
seal  as  decoration  was  recovered.  The  fragment, 
perhaps  from  the  back  of  the  bowl,  has  a 
rouletted  rim,  with  the  upper  portion  of  a  seal 
with  a  beaded  rim,  foliate  decoration,  and  the 
word  "of"  in  the  upper  center  (Figure  10-24). 


Miscellaneous  lettered  bowl  fragments  (3) 

Three  fragments  with  partial  lettered 
inscriptions  were  recovered.  The  first  of  these  is 
a  thick  walled  fragment  showing  heavy  use, 
apparently  of  a  "bent,"  "billiard,"  or  "apple" 
shape  (cf.  Herment  1954:36;  Weber  1962:  51; 
Sherman  1970:  80-81).  The  left  rear  of  the  bowl 
bears  the  impressed  letters  "IR..."  or  "IF..."  in  an 
impressed  rectangle  which  ends,  of  course  at  the 
point  where  the  lettering  is  broken  off.  The 
rectangle  is  located  approximately  1.1  cm.  below 
the  rim  (Figure  10-15,  left). 

A  second  fragment,  badly  burned  after 
discard,  bears  the  embossed  letter  "...T"  in  an 
impressed  rectangle,  about  0.5  cm.  below  the 
rim.  The  fragment  is  apparently  the  left  part  of  a 
bowl  back,  but  because  of  its  small  size  and  its 
condition,  it  is  difficult  to  be  certain  of  this. 

The  third  fragment  in  this  category  is  a  left 
portion  of  a  bowl  back  in  an  "apple"  or  "billiard" 
shape  with  the  impressed  initial  "H"  or  "w"  in  an 
embossed  circle  with  a  diameter  of  0.7  cm., 
located  0.8  cm.  below  the  rim.  This  fragment 
shows  evidence  of  heavy  use. 


"Claw"  bowl  fragments  (2) 

Two  mending  terra  cotta  bowl  fragments  form 
a  partial  bowl  in  the  shape  of  a  ball  held  by  a 
claw  (Figure  10-23).  This  bowl  is  extremely 
small,  with  the  height  of  the  extant  portion  at  just 
over  2  cm.,  and  the  diameter  of  the  bowl  at  1.3 
cm.  Both  Davidson  and  McDougall  in  Glasgow 
made  "claw"  pipes  Gallagher  and  Price  1987: 
figs.  7,  20;  McDougall  n.d.),  but  pipes  with  the 
same  motif  are  known  to  have  been  made 
between  1864  and  ca.  1874  in  East  Alton  and 
Wolfeboro,  New  Hampshire  by  a  pipemaker 
named  John  Taber  (Watkins  1968:  134-135; 
Sudbury  1979:  172-173).  The  boardinghouse 
pipe  is  less  ornate  than  catalogue  illustrations  of 
the  Davidson  material,  nor  does  it  resemble 
illustrated  Taber  material  (Watkins  1968: 
fig.85c).   In  fact  the  closest  analog  to  the  pipe  in 


Rouletted  bowl  rim  fragment  (1) 

This  fragment  has  rectangular  rouletting 
below  the  rim,  which  is  smeared  as  it  approaches 
the  rim.  The  rouletting  is  identical  to  that  on  the 
"Home  Rule"  pipes  described  above  (Figure  10- 
15),  although  the  fragment  does  not  mend  with 
them. 


Foliate  embossed  bowl  rim  fragment  (1) 

A  single  fragment  bearing  a  foliate  design  in 
high  relief  is  present  in  the  collection.  The 
design  is  similar  but  not  identical  to  that  on  a 
fragment  recovered  from  Port  Arthur  Tasmania 
(Jack  1986:  fig.3i).   The  Lowell  fragment  appears 


Tobacco-Related  Material     203 


Figure  10-21.  Fluted  pipe  bowl  fragment,  showing  foliate  front  seam. 


Figure  10-22.  Partially  fluted  pipe  bowl  base  fragment. 


204    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  10-23.  Tcrra-cotta  "claw"  pipe  bowl 
fragment.  Not  to  scale.  (Drawing  by  Lauren  J. 
Cook.) 


Figure  10-24.  Armorial  pipe  bowl  fragment,  with 
unidentified  seal  on  bowl  back. 


Figure  10-25.  Plastic  pipe  mouthpieces.  Top,  Operation  A,  feature  44,  level  B.  Bottom,  Operation  B, 
2ln8w,  level  2. 


Tobacco-Related  Material    205 


to  consist  of  the  front  of  the  bowl,  and  shows  no 
signs  of  use. 


indicating  continued  use.  This  stem  appears  to 
be  a  "one-half  curve"  shape,  and  was  used  with  a 
bowl  that  had  a  shank-hole  of  about  0.85  cm. 


Heels  (4) 

Four  heels,  which  had  broken  off  of  bowls, 
were  recovered.  None  of  these  heels  were 
marked,  and  none  of  them  matched  any  of  the 
bowls  in  the  collection  from  which  the  heels  had 
been  broken. 


Bone   Mouthpiece  (1) 

A  fragment  of  what  appears  to  be  a  lipped 
bone  mouthpiece  was  recovered  from  8nl0w/2, 
in  Operation  A  (Figure  10-11,  second  from  right). 
This  piece  is  very  crudely  made,  apparently  on  a 
lathe,  and  exhibits  some  hand-filing  as  well.  The 
bore  is  drilled,  with  a  diameter  of  6/64".  There  is 
some  apparent  brown  staining  along  the  bore, 
and  there  may  be  tooth-wear  on  the  lip  as  well. 
What  kind  of  pipe  this  mouthpiece  may  have 
been  used  with  is  not  known,  although  its  wide 
circumference  (nearly  a  centimeter)  would  tend 
to  make  its  use  uncomfortable. 


Cuspidor  Fragments  (2) 

Two  mending  fragments  of  a  redware 
cuspidor,  or  spitoon,  were  recovered.  The  larger 
fragment  was  recovered  from  trench  2,  level  9b, 
and  the  smaller  fragment  from  Operation  B, 
feature  61,  level  2.  This  vessel  had  a  wide,  flaring 
lip  with  a  diameter  at  the  edge  of  18  cm.  The  rim 
sloped  inward  to  a  constriction  of  10  cm.  interior 
diameter,  about  3  cm.  below  the  edge.  The  body 
of  the  vessel  bellied  out  below  the 
constriction. The  interior  of  the  vessel  was  glazed 
with  a  dark  brown  lead  glaze  that  begins  below 
the  constriction.  The  surfaces  of  the  exterior  and 
the  interior  of  the  rim  are  covered  with  a  blue- 
green  substance  that  may  be  a  copper-based 
pigment  used  to  decorate  the  vessel.  The 
exterior  of  the  rim  is  molded  in  bas  relief  with  a 
repetitive  pattern  of  scrolls.  The  fact  that  this 
vessel  was  recovered  from  the  boardinghouse 
yard  is  a  clear  indication  that  at  one  point 
chewing  tobacco  was  in  use  at  the 
boardinghouse. 


Plastic  Mouthpieces  (2) 

Two  plastic  mouthpieces  were  recovered,  one 
from  Feature  44,  level  b,  in  Operation  A  (Figure 
10-25,  top),  and  the  other  from  21n8w/2  in 
Operation  B  (Figure  10-25.  bottom).  The  two 
stems,  which  would  have  been  used  in  either  a 
clay  (cf.  American  Clay  Pipe  Works  1988:  5,  8),  a 
brier,  or  less  likely,  a  meerschaum  bowl,  are  very 
similar,  but  not  identical.  Both  are  of  molded 
amber-colored  plastic,  in  bent  shape,  with 
saddle  bits  and  "wedge"  bit  orifices  (see  Weber 
1965:  99-105  for  terminology).  Both  joined  to  the 
shank  as  push,  or  "stag"  bits,  and  exhibit  signs  of 
heavy  use.  Heated  smoke  has  warped  and 
checked  the  plastic  on  those  portions  of  the  bits 
that  firt  inside  the  shanks. 

The  example  from  Operation  B  is  in  fairly 
good  shape  and  was  probably  lost  rather  than 
intentionally  discarded.  It  appears  to  be  a 
"three-quarter  curved"  stem.  It  has  prominent 
seams,  and  was  used  in  a  bowl  with  a  shank-hole 
diameter  of  0.8  cm.  There  is  pronounced  tooth- 
wear  on  both  the  upper  and  lower  surfaces 
adjacent  to  the  lip. 

The  example  from  feature  44  has  the  lip 
broken  off,  after  which  the  user  filed  it  down  and 
smoked  it  until  the  stem  wore  through  and 
cracked.  There  is  extensive  tooth-wear  on  the 
upper  and  lower  surfaces  near  the  broken  end, 


Pocket  Calendar  Fragment  (1) 

A  single  fragment  of  a  blue  plastic  calendar 
was  recovered  from  above  feature  9  in  Trench  2 
during  preliminary  testing  (Figure  10-26).  The 
calendar  was  about  8  cm.  in  length,  and  had 
been  torn  from  top  to  bottom.  The  surviving 
portion  contained  the  following  information, 
above  the  calendar  itself: 

...GHER 
Gorham  St., 

...ASS. 

...BACCO 
The  remaining  portion  of  the  calendar  bears 
dates  for  the  period  from  September,  1895,  to 
February,  1896.  Earlier  dates  were  apparently 
present  on  the  fragment  or  fragments  that  were 
not  recovered.  The  calendar  was  probably 
intentionally  destroyed  and  discarded  at  some 
point  after  February,  1896.  Dating  was  possible 
because  the  legend  "1896"  appears  between 
December  and  January,  but  a  perpetual 
calendar  was  used  to  verify  that  the  remaining 
legible  dates  occurred  during  1895-1896. 

Gorham  Street  begins  several  blocks  to  the 
southeast  of  the  Boott  Mills  Boardinghouses, 
and  is  within  convenient  walking  distance. 
Research  in  the  Lowell  City  Directories 
published  during  the  1890s  failed  to  disclose  any 
grocers  or  tobacconists  with  surnames  ending  in 


206    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


tGHER, 

GorhamSt., 

ACCO 


T  W 


DEC 


14 

1229 
721 25  JO  31 

1    i 

J  4  «?  7  8  » 
10  il  IX  13  14  15  •« 
17  1*  10  V  2123 
1   25  2    J7  2S29  10 


I    2    3   4   5  « 
8   9  10  II  12  13 
lb  16  17  IA      2 
21  ,,}    2b  2*2/ at 


I   2 


Figure  10-26.   Blue  plastic  pocket  calendar 
fragment,  1895-1896.  The  business  that 
distributed  this  calendar  has  not  yet  been 
identified. 


"...gher"  doing  business  on  Gorham  Street  in 
Lowell  during  that  decade.  The  business  in 
question  may  have  been  located  in  a 
neighboring  community  or  nearby  city  with  a 
Gorham  Street,  or  it  may  have  referred  to  a 
temporary  business  location  that  was  not 
entered  in  the  directories.  It  is  also  possible  that 
the  calendar  was  a  misprint. 


Archeological  Implications  of  the  Material 

The  most  striking  aspect  of  the  clay  pipes  in 
the  collection  is  their  late  date.  Although  the 
Binford  pipe  stem  formula  produced  a  date  of 
June,  1761,  for  the  collection  as  a  whole2,  the  fact 
that  this  date  is  more  than  60  years  before  the 
city  of  Lowell  was  established  indicates  the  well- 
known  dangers  of  using  the  formula  on  small 
samples  of  material  later  than  ca.  1780  (cf.  Noel 
Hume  1963:  22-23).  Information  derived  using 
other  methods  in  this  case  provides  much  later 
(and  much  more  secure)  dates.  The  practice  for 
much  of  the  19th  century  was  to  mark  pipes  with 
the  name  of  the  city  where  they  were 
manufactured.  The  McKinley  Tariff  Act  of  1891 
required  that  all  items  imported  to  the  United 
States  bear  the  name  of  the  nation  where  they 
were  made,  at  which  time  pipe  makers  began 
marking  their  pipes  with  the  name  of  their 
country.  Until  recently,  pipes  with  "Scotland"  as 
the  country  of  origin  were  known  only  from  a  few 
sites  in  this  hemisphere,  while  pipes  marked 
"Glasgow"  and  "Edinburgh"  are  ubiquitous.  The 
virtual  absence  of  pipes  marked  "Scotland" 
indicates  that  very  few  sites  dating  later  than 
1891  have  been  analyzed  and  published  (Walker 
1983:  13).  Of  the  legible  Scottish  pipes  in  the 
boardinghouse  collection  nearly  80%  are  marked 
"Scotland."  The  immediate  implication  of  this  is 
that  much  of  the  material  in  the  collection  was 
manufactured — and  hence  used  and 
discarded — after  1891.  By  that  time  the  very 
presence  of  clay  pipes  would  seem  on  the  basis 
of  documentary  evidence  to  indicate  working- 
class  occupation. 

Using  the  shift  from  "Glasgow"  to  "Scotland" 
as  providing  a  terminus  post  quern  of  1891,  it  is 
possible  to  assign  dates  to  some  of  the  features 
encountered  at  the  boardinghouses.  Of  65 
features  encountered  during  the  preliminary 
testing  and  the  excavation  of  Operations  A  and 
B,  17  contained  clay  pipe  material.  Of  these,  10 
contained  Scottish  stem  fragments  marked  with 
the  place  of  origin.  Table  10-2  shows  the  feature 


2The  exact  number,  based  on  276  stem  fragments  and 
bowls,  was  1761.4821. 


Tobacco-Related  Material     207 


numbers,  locations  and  brief  descriptions  of 
those  features  that  could  be  dated  post-1891,  on 
the  basis  of  their  containing  stem  fragments 
marked  Scotland. 


responsibility  that  occupants  felt  (or  were  held  to 
by  the  company)  for  the  cleanliness  of  their 
yards  lie  behind  differential  deposition  and 
maintenance  of  the  two  yards  (cf.  Beaudry  1989). 


Table  10-2 

.  Post- 

-1891  features. 

H/Level 

Operation 

Locus 

Feature  Type 

2/9b,  c,  d 

B 

Tr2 

Well 

6 

B 

Tr.2 

Pipe  trench 

24 

A 

2N4W 

Black  lens/ stain 

25/d 

A 

0-2N10W 

Bulkhead  entry 

37/b 

A 

8N6W 

Brick  drainbox 

44/c 

A 

6-8N6-8W 

Drainbox  trench 

45/b 

A 

4N0-2E 

Privy 

61/2 

B 

17N0W 

Privy 

An  examination  of  Table  10-2  indicates  that 
the  bulk  of  the  marked  material  in  sealed 
feature  contexts  was  recovered  from  Operation 
A.  This  is  probably  due  in  large  part  to  the 
differential  stategies  that  were  employed  in 
regard  to  the  excavation  of  features  between  the 
two  operations.  This  issue  is  discussed  more 
fully  in  Chapter  5.  Note  that  the  dates  derived 
using  this  dating  criterion  are  consistent  with 
those  derived  from  other  material  for  features  45 
and  61  (both  privies),  which  were  apparently 
filled  in  the  second  decade  of  this  century.  The 
1891  terminus  post  quern  for  feature  25 
(bulkhead  entryway)  is  interesting.  This  feature 
was  sealed  off  from  the  cellar  and  filled  in  at 
some  point  before  the  1920s,  when  the  structure 
was  demolished.  It  is  clear  from  the  pipe 
materials  in  the  feature  that  this  occurred  after 
1891. 

It  was  hoped  that  the  pipe  materials  could 
assist  in  dating  contexts  other  than  sealed 
features,  specifically  the  deposition  of  levels,  in 
the  same  way  that  they  were  useful  in  dating 
features.  Tables  10-3  and  10-4  show  the 
distribution  of  marked  Scottish  pipe  stems  in  the 
excavated  levels  in  Operations  A  and  B. 

It  is  clear  from  Table  10-3  that  the  earlier,  pre- 
1891,  marked  Scottish  material  is  concentrated 
in  level  1  of  Operation  B.  By  contrast,  the  post- 
1891  material  is  distributed  across  the  site,  and 
although  most  of  it  is  in  level  1,  there  is  a  fair 
amount  in  level  2  as  well.  One  possible 
explanation  for  this  difference  between 
distributions  of  earlier  and  later  material 
between  operations  may  lie  in  the  fact  that 
Operation  A  lies  behind  units  that  were 
occupied  as  tenements  for  much  of  the  period 
during  which  the  dwellings  were  occupied,  while 
Operation  B  was  the  boardinghouse  yard.  It  is 
likely  that  differences  in  both  the  frequency  of 
usage     by     tenants     and     the     degree     of 


Table  10-3.   Distribution  of  Scottish  pipe  stems  marked 
Glasgow  by  operation  and  level. 


Operation  A 
Level  1 
Level  2 
Total 

Operation  B 
Level  1 
Level  2 
Total 

Site  Totals 
Level  1 
Level  2 
Total 


Table  10-4.   Distribution  of  Scottish  pipe  stems  marked 
Scotland  by  operation  and  level. 


0 

0.0 

0 

0.0 

0 

0.0 

8 

100.0 

0 

0.0 

8 

100.0 

8 

100.0 

0 

0.0 

8 

100.0 

Operation  A 

Level  1 

10 

45.5 

Level  2 

2 

9.1 

Total 

12 

54.6 

Operation  B 

Level  1 

7 

31.8 

Level  2 

3 

13.6 

Total 

10 

45.4 

Site  Totals 

Level  1 

17 

77.3 

Level  2 

5 

22.7 

Total 

22 

100.0 

Summary 

Although  the  tobacco-related  materials 
recovered  from  the  backlots  of  the  Boott  Mills 
Boardinghouse  fall  too  late  for  the  application  of 
common  quantitative  dating  methods  such  as 
Harrington's  histogram  dating  method,  or 
Binford's  regression  equation,  the  shift  from  the 
use  of  the  name  of  the  city  of  manufacture  to 
that  of  the  country  of  manufacture  provides  a 
broad  dating  criterion.  This  enabled  some  eight 
contexts  at  the  site,  five  from  Operation  A  and 
three  from  within  Operation  B,  to  be  assigned  a 
post-1891  date  (see  Table  10-2).  In  addition, 
differences  in  distributions  of  pre-1891  pipes 
between  levels  were  observed  between 
operations,  which  may  have  resulted  from 
differential  land  use  patterns  in  the  two  backlots. 


208    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Chapter  11 

TOBACCO-RELATED  MATERIAL  AND  THE 
CONSTRUCTION  OF  WORKING-CLASS  CULTURE 

by  Lauren  J.  Cook 


"Tell  me  what  you  smoke  and  1  will 

tell  you  who  you  are" 

—Journal  Pour  Rire,  1851  ("Historicus"  1924) 


Introduction 


As  recent  research  has  shown,  the  degree  to 
which  relationships  among  concepts  and 
ideologies  can  be  demonstrated  through  the 
archaeological  record  provides  a  fertile  field  of 
study  (Deetz  1974;  Hodder  1982;  Leone  and 
Potter  1988b).  Such  research  draws  on  a 
considerable  body  of  work  in  material  culture 
studies  and  semiotics,  which  holds  that  artifacts 
have  meanings  that  may  be  read.  Artifacts  are 
seen  as  concrete  encapsulations  of  social 
relationships — embodying  the  attitudes  and 
behaviors  of  the  past: 

The  underlying  premise  [of  material  culture  study] 
is  that  objects  made  or  modified  by  man  reflect, 
consciously  or  unconsciously,  directly  or  indirectly, 
the  beliefs  of  the  individuals  who  made, 
commissioned,  purchased,  or  used  them  and,  by 
extension,  the  beliefs  of  the  larger  society  to  which 
they  belonged.  (Prown  1988: 19) 

Problems  of  definition  abound.  Each  of  those 
engaged  in  this  type  of  research  appears  to  have 
a  better  idea  where  he  or  she  stands  in  terms  of 
theory  than  of  where  others  stand.  Those  who 
look  for  meaning  in  the  archaeological  record 
have  their  choice  of  a  variety  of  theoretical 
frameworks  through  which  they  can  approach 
the  subject,  including  structuralism,  cognitive 
semiotics,  economic  theory,  marxism,  and 
critical  theory.  With  this  theoretical 
smorgasbord  spread  out  before  us,  considerable 
effort  has  gone  into  presenting  these 
approaches  in  all  of  their  variety.  Examples  of 
recent  syntheses  and  edited  volumes  that 
approach  the  issue  of  meaning  in  the 
archaeological  record  include  Hodder  1982, 
1986,  1989;  Leone  1986;  and  Leone  and  Potter 
1988b.  These  techniques  have  been  applied  to 
such  diverse  components  of  the  material  record 
as  architecture  (Glassie  1975;  Bourdieu  1977; 
Leone  1977;  Anderson  and  Moore  1988), 
ceramics  (Deetz  1974;  Wall  1989;  Burley  1989; 
Yentsch  n.d.b),  formal  gardens  (Leone  1988a; 
Leone  et  al.  1989),  and  cemeteries  (McGuire 
1988). 


The  present  study  examines  the  relationship 
between  a  set  of  behaviors — those  involved  in 
the  use  or  consumption  of  tobacco — and  their 
effect  on  the  archaeological  record.  The  focus 
here  is  on  what  tobacco  behaviors  and  their 
material  components  meant  in  19th-century 
culture.  It  is  possible  to  approach  those 
meanings  through  the  examination  both  of 
documentary  sources  and  artifacts,  each  of 
which  conveys  meaning  in  different  ways. 

A  number  of  factors  influence  tobacco 
behavior.  Primary  among  them  are  the  social 
class,  ethnicity  and  gender  of  the  actor,  and  it  is 
these  three  social  divisions  that  I  have  used  to 
structure  this  essay.  Other  factors,  such  as  the 
situational  contexts  in  which  tobacco  may  be 
used,  the  age  of  the  user,  and  regional  patterns 
of  use,  are  woven  across  the  major  threads  of 
class,  ethnicity,  and  gender. 


Style  and  Symbol 

At  this  point  it  will  be  useful  to  discuss  the 
ways  in  which  objects  are  used  as  symbols,  and 
how  they  function  as  such.  In  semiotic  terms, 
meaning  is  said  to  be  signified  by  a  particular 
signifier  (a  word,  a  written  character,  an  image, 
or  an  object).  This  relationship  between 
representation  and  meaning — signifier  and 
signified,  is  known  as  a  sign.  For  example,  red 
roses  signify  passion,  and  when  used 
intentionally  to  do  so,  they  constitute  a  sign  of 
passion  (Barthes  1957b:  197-198).  A  symbol  is  an 
arbitrary  sign,  such  as  a  red  traffic  signal — there 
is  no  particular  reason  that  a  red  traffic  signal 
should  be  a  sign  to  stop,  except  that  that 
meaning  has  been  assigned  to  it  by  society 
(Hawkes  1977:  129).  The  function  of  the  symbol 
is  one  of  linkage  in  the  process  of 
communicating  about  the  unknown  by  means  of 
the  known  (the  symbol  itself).  That  is,  properties 
assigned  to  the  symbol  by  consensus  may  be 
transferred  by  the  observer  to  the  situation  in 
which  the  symbol  is  employed.  The  symbol  and 
the  symbolized  are  not  seen  as  being  in  a  static 
cognitive  relationship,  but  rather  articulate  with 


209 


210    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


one  another  as  components  of  a  shifting  and 
dynamic  relationship  (Turner  1974:  25-30). 
Symbols  are  signs  used  in  a  communicative, 
semiotic  process.  Objects  often  function  as 
symbols  and  have  been  approached  semiotically 
by  scholars  (Krampen  1979). 

While  particular  objects  and  their  symbolism 
vary  between  cultures,  the  use  of  objects  as 
symbols  is  pan-cultural.  Attempts  on  the  part  of 
prehistorians  to  identify  symbols  and  symbolic 
domains  in  the  material  culture  of  pre-literate 
populations  (e.g.,  Shanks  and  Tilley  1982; 
Shennan  1982),  are  predicated  on  the  universal 
role  that  the  relationship  between  symbolic 
action  and  object-symbols  plays  in  social 
interaction.  Csiksentmihalyi  and  Rochberg- 
Halton  argue  quite  persuasively  that  our 
interaction  with  certain  categories  of  objects  as 
material  entities  is  inextricable  from  our 
interaction  with  them  as  symbols.  The  domestic 
objects  that  clutter  our  living  space  may  be 
viewed  as  "meaningful  only  as  part  of  a 
communicative  sign  process  and  are  active 
ingredients  of  that  process"  (Csiksentmihalyi 
and  Rochberg-Halton  1981:  173).  As  symbols, 
artifacts  fix  on  their  owners  and  users  certain 
culture-specific  attributes — in  effect,  they  serve 
as  "the  visible  part  of  culture,"  by  "making  firm 
and  visible  a  particular  set  of  judgements  in  the 
fluid  processes  of  classifying  persons  and 
events"  (Douglas  and  Isherwood  1979:  66-67). 
The  use  of  material  items  in  facilitating 
judgement  and  classification  is  central  to  this 
essay.  Through  it  we  can  approach  the  ways  in 
which  individuals  constructed  their  cultural 
identity. 

The  role  of  leisure  activities,  or  those  activities 
that  are  not  considered  work,  is  important  to  self- 
definition  and  self-expression.  All  of  us  spend 
part  of  our  time  working  and  part  of  our  time 
doing  other  things.  While  the  importance  of 
work  in  the  process  of  self-definition  is 
undeniable,  there  is  a  considerable  body  of 
literature  supporting  the  contention  that  it  is 
through  leisure,  or  at  least  non-work,  activities 
that  the  greater  part  of  self-definition  and  self- 
expression  takes  place  (Pieper  1952;  Huizinga 
1970;  Godbey  1981:  98,  123-125)— people  "create 
strong  and  complex  selves  by  investing  their 
psychic  energy  in  activities  that  are  usually 
called  'leisure'  "  (Csiksentmihalyi  and 
Rochberg-Halton  1981:  48).  In  a  capitalist, 
industrialized  society  the  working  class  will  not 
control  the  means  of  production,  but  its 
members  will  express  themselves  individually 
and  as  a  subculture  through  other  components 
of  what  Csiksentmihalyi  and  Rochberg-Halton 
(1981:  49)  call  "the  means  of  action."  They  define 


the  means  of  action  as  "any  object  or  sign  that 
allows  a  person  to  'make  his  self  manifest,'" 
(including,  where  applicable,  the  means  of 
production). 

Social  psychologists  tell  us  that  the  process  of 
classifying  others  and  assessing  their  intentions 
and  motives  is  a  transitory,  swift,  and  necessary 
component  of  public  interaction.  Through  a 
staggering  variety  of  signs  (including  objects), 
gestures  and  postures,  we  communicate  to  those 
with  whom  we  interact,  telling  them  who  we  are 
and  what  we  are  doing: 

Everyone  knows  of  course,  that  the  individual 
necessarily  provides  a  reading  of  himself  when  he 
is  in  the  presence  of  others.  Gender,  age,  class,  state 
of  health,  ethnicity  will  all  be  conveyed,  in  the 
main  unwittingly.  (Goffman  1971:  127) 

Those  social  psychologists  specializing  in  urban 
interaction  emphasize  that  these  presentations 
of  self  occur  in  the  arena  of  the  street  (cf.  Sennett 
1978:  164-166).  Lyn  Lofland  refers  to  this  process 
of  classification  of  others  as  "appearential 
ordering,"  a  term  that  stresses  both  the 
classificatory  function  of  the  activity  and  its 
reliance  on  appearance  as  the  criterion  of 
judgement.  In  such  a  "problematic  world  of 
strangers,"  as  the  city, 

all  the  city  dweller  had  to  go  on,  to  know  anything 
at  all  about  these  other  people,  was  the 
information  he  could  glean  by  looking  at  them...  . 
City  life  was  made  possible  by  an  "ordering"  of  the 
urban  populace  in  terms  of  appearance  and  spatial 
location  such  that  those  within  the  city  could  know 
a  great  deal  about  one  another  by  simply  looking. 
(Lofland  1973:  22) 

The  process  of  "decoding"  the  appearance  of 
others  is  based  on  the  use  of  visible  symbols 
encoded  primarily  in  forms  of  dress  and  other 
bodily  adornments  (jewelry,  hair  styles,  etc.)  as 
well  as  in  behavior  (Praetzcllis,  Praetzellis,  and 
Brown  1987).  The  Victorian  context  was  marked 
by  a  "miniaturization"  of  visible  symbols,  in 
which  appearential  ordering  turned  on  the 
smallest  details  of  dress  or  appearance  (Sennett 
1978:165-168). 

The  power  of  material  symbols  to 
communicate  often  lies  in  their  use  "out  of 
context" — that  is  in  contexts  other  than  those  in 
which  the  dominant  cultural  tradition  would 
apply  them.  An  extreme  example  would  be  the 
"Punk"  usage  of  safety  pins  as  earrings  rather 
than  as  fasteners.  Such  recycling  of  the 
mundane  in  a  symbolic  context  is  informative  to 
the  initiated  (cf.  Barthes  1981:  58). 

The  tensions  between  dominant  and  subordinate 
groups  can  be  found  reflected  in  the  surfaces  of 
subculture — in  the  styles  of  mundane  objects  which 
have  a  double  meaning.  On  the  one  hand,  they 
warn  the  'straight'  world  in  advance  of  a  sinister 


Tobacco  and  Working-Class  Culture   111 


presence — the  presence  of  difference — and  draw 
down  upon  themselves  vague  suspicions,  uneasy 
laughter,  'white  and  dumb  rages.'  On  the  other 
hand,  for  those  who  erect  them  into  icons,  who  use 
them  as  words  or  curses,  these  objects  become  signs  of 
forbidden  identity,  sources  of  value.  (Hebdige  1979: 
2-3) 

Style,  then,  communicates  subculture,  and  is 
instrumental  in  group  definition  and  boundary 
maintenance.  Ethnic  and  class  subcultures 
wield  style  as  an  tool  to  identify  those  who 
"belong,"  and  occasionally  as  a  weapon  to  annoy 
those  who  do  not. 

The  focus  of  analysis  that  follows  is  intended  to 
look  beyond  the  distribution  of  material  culture 
as  a  function  of  wealth,  or  as  a  function  of 
differential  access  to  resources.  The  purpose  is 
to  build  on  the  notion  of  "consumer  choice"  as  it 
has  been  used  recently  by  archaeologists  (e.g., 
Spencer-Wood  1987),  and  extend  the 
motivations  that  underlie  choice  to  include 
factors  that  are  not  strictly  economic,  and  that 
are  not  often  easily  quantifiable.  The  central 
thesis  is  that  material  items  have  symbolic 
meanings  to  those  who  use  them,  and  that 
through  intentional  (if  not  self-conscious) 
manipulation  of  those  items  in  social  contexts, 
those  symbolic  meanings  are  articulated  and 
communicated  to  others.  Those  meanings 
include  moral  and  aesthetic  decisions. 
Consumer  choice  is  in  large  part  a  function  of 
the  symbolism  attached  by  the  consumer  to  the 
consumed.  A  purchased  item  is  "consumed  in 
its  image"  as  well  as  through  usage  (Barthes 
1957a:  150).  Differential  choice  is  often  a 
reflection  of  different  moral  or  aesthetic  choices 
on  the  part  of  consumers — that  is  of  different 
symbolic  values  being  attached  to  objects  (cf. 
Miller  1987:  106-107).  Members  of  different 
social  classes,  different  ethnic  groups — different 
subcultures — will  choose  different  symbols  in 
the  construction  of  social  reality,  and  this  will  be 
reflected,  often  alongside  economic  concerns, 
in  the  material  record  (cf.  Beaudry  1984b). 

The  definition  of  class  favored  here  is  E.P. 
Thompson's,  who  argued  that  class  is  a  historical 
process  that  can  be  studied  through  the 
"observation  of  behavior  over  time"  (Thompson 
1978:  147) — a  relationship  between  people  that 
"must  always  be  embodied  in  real  people  and  in 
a  real  context"  (Thompson  1963:  9-10).  Class 
thus  exists  only  when  it  is  articulated.  The 
clearest  examples  of  articulation  are  those 
occasions  when  behaviors  conflict — the  resulting 
"flashpoints,"  to  use  Gareth  Stedman  Jones' 
term,  are  fertile  areas  for  the  study  of  class 
relationships.  But  as  Jones  points  out,  looking 
only  at  conflict  distorts  our  view  of  class 
relations — "it  is  as  if  the  only  records  of  the 


bourgeoisie  came  from  the  bankruptcy  courts, 
and  the  only  records  of  marriage  from  divorce 
petitions"  (Jones  1977:  163).  This  has  resulted  in 
an  overemphasis  by  scholars  on  efforts  by  the 
bourgeoisie  to  change  working  class  leisure 
behavior,  at  the  expense  of  the  study  of  the 
workers'  resistance  to  change.  Often  resistance 
was  expressed  through  non-verbal  behavior — 
petty,  everyday  acts  that  may  have  been 
patterned  but  were  seldom  part  of  a  planned 
program — and  often  it  was  at  least  partially 
communicated  through  the  medium  of  material 
culture. 

There  is  a  wealth  of  documentary  evidence  on 
tobacco  use  during  the  19th  and  early  20th 
centuries.  Tobacco  use  is  a  form  of  behavior  that 
occurs  in  episodes,  some  of  which  are  described 
in  the  contemporary  documentary  record.  In 
some  cases,  the  sources  describe  the 
observations  of  a  single  episode,  in  other  cases, 
they  summarize  the  collected  experience  of  a 
number  of  episodes.  In  all  cases,  they  offer 
information  about  the  motivations  of  the 
participants — what  it  is  that  they  wish  to 
communicate  by  their  behavior — and  how  they 
do  so.  The  sources  testify  to  the  biases  and 
motives  of  their  writers  as  well.  This  information 
is  relevant  to  the  beliefs  and  values  of  the  society 
at  large. 

If  the  manipulation  of  symbols  in  the 
expression  of  the  self  is  indeed  so  strongly 
centered  in  behavior  that  occurs  in  non-work 
contexts,  then  the  stress  on  "leisure"  and 
"popular  culture"  in  the  writing  of  social 
historians  interested  in  the  construction  and 
nature  of  working-class  culture  is 
understandable.1  Equally  important,  the 
implications  for  urban  historical  archaeology  of 
the  industrial  period  are  considerable.  Because 
of  the  increasing  tendency  to  separate  the 
workplace  and  the  household,  the  greater  part  of 
the  material  that  we  recover  and  analyze  relates 
to  household  life,  rather  than  to  work  (the 
exception  to  this  is  of  course  traditional 
industrial  archaeology,  where  the  means  of 
production  is  often  under  direct  observation). 

The  archaeological  record  offers  information 
that  is  more  specific  than  that  in  the 
documentary  record.  The  boardinghouse 
materials  are  the  results  of  individual  episodes 
that  communicated  specific  meaning  to  actual 
people.  They  are  not  as  informative  as  the 
documentary  sources,  but  they  have  what  Prown 
calls  "veracity" — as  the  less  conscious  products 

^or  example,  Gutman  1973:  inter  alia;  Thompson  1974; 
Jones  1974: 476-480, 485-488;  Jones  1977;  Yeo  and  Yeo  1981; 
Rosenzwdg  1983;  Couvares  1984: 31-51;  and  Denning  1987. 


212    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


of  behavior,  the  artifacts  are  "potentially  more 
truthful"  than  the  documentary  sources  (Prown 
1988:  21).  More  important  in  the  context  of  the 
Boott  Mills  research,  in  examining  working  class 
behavior  we  must  remember  that  the 
documentary  sources  communicate  middle  and 
upper  class  assumptions — the  only  testimony 
that  we  have  from  the  working  people 
themselves  in  this  case  are  the  fragments  of  the 
items  that  they  purchased,  modified,  used,  and 
threw  away.  In  combination  with  information  on 
kin  networks  and  resistance  to  the  social  control 
exercised  by  the  company  (Beaudry  1989:  28;  see 
also  Bond,  Chapters  3  and  5,  this  volume)  the 
artifacts  can  provide  us  with  a  clearer  picture  of 
the  construction  of  working-class  culture. 


"Power  Pipes"? 

Power  is  not  a  general  system  of  domination  exerted 
by  one  group  over  another.  Rather,  power  is 
everywhere,  produced  at  every  moment  in  every 
action.  (Hodder  1986:  66,  summarizing  Foucault 
19772) 

An  approach  to  class  subcultures  is  essential 
to  historical  archaeology — such  a  perspective 
will  permit  an  understanding  of  the  ways  in 
which  class  divisions  combined  with  ethnic  and 
gender  differences  to  give  pattern  to  past 
material  life.  Such  patterns  arise  both  out  of 
differentials  in  wealth,  and  equally  important, 
different  concepts  of  how  class  identity  should 
be  mediated.  As  discussed  above,  mediation  of 
subcultural  identity  constitutes  a  discourse  in 
which  both  subcultures  and  majority  cultures 
engage.  For  this  reason,  theoretical  stances  that 
ignore  or  downplay  the  richness  of  symbolic 
interaction  among  and  between  members  of  all 
classes  will  provide  only  incomplete 
explanations  of  past  processes  and  events.  For 
example,  in  a  recent  essay,  Robert  Paynter  (1988) 
presents  some  preliminary  thoughts  on  an 
"archaeology  of  capitalism".  He  makes  many 
valid  points,  among  them  that  historical 
archaeology  must  be  informed  by  both  world 
and  class  perspectives.  But  by  dismissing  the 
study  of  symbolic  aspects  of  the  past  as 
"idealist,"  he  severely  limits  the  scope  of  his 
analysis  (Paynter  1988:  408-409).  Rather  than 
examining  what  Csiksentmihalyi  and  Rochberg- 
Halton  call  the  "means  of  action,"  Paynter's 
analysis  is  confined  to  the  much  narrower  means 
of  production.  He  concludes  that  change  in 
material  culture  (in  the  narrowly  defined  area  of 
manufacturing    technology)    is    the   result   of 


dSee  also  Foucault  1980:  141-142. 


increasing  mechanization  spurred  by  a  desire  to 
cut  labor  costs  in  the  face  of  union  demands. 
This  should  be  of  considerable  interest  to 
industrial  archaeologists,  but  will  be  of  limited 
utility  to  researchers  working  on  residential  sites. 
Inasmuch  as  class  membership  occurs  both 
within  and  outside  of  the  workplace,  class-based 
models  are  as  useful  (or  as  necessary)  for 
interpreting  the  consumption  of  goods  as  they 
are  for  interpreting  their  production. 

Much  of  the  documentary  record  reflects 
opinions,  desires,  and  omissions  consciously  or 
unconsciously  imparted  to  it  by  its  authors.  As 
those  authors  were  very  often  members  of  the 
class  or  classes  that  either  perceived  themselves 
as  dominant  in  society,  or  wished  to  be 
dominant,  their  views  of  class,  society,  and 
commodity  consumption  must  be  approached 
critically,  as  Mark  Leone  and  others  have 
demonstrated  (Leone,  Potter,  and  Shackel  1987). 
A  critical  approach  alone  is  not,  however, 
enough.  There  is  a  strong  temptation  to  limit 
one's  analysis  to  the  classes  that  produce  the 
documentary  record.  They  are  after  all  the 
groups  whose  symbolic  universe  and  ideology 
are  most  clearly  reflected  in  the  documents,  and 
whose  homes  are  the  most  likely  to  be  the 
subject  of  research-oriented  archaeological 
programs.  One  danger  in  doing  this  is  that  in 
concentrating  on  the  lifeways  of  the  literate  and 
propertied,  it  becomes  all  too  easy  to  forget  that 
there  were  working-class  people,  and  that  it  is 
possible  to  approach  their  lives  as  well.  If  we  can 
do  archaeology  from  the  top  down,  we  can  do  it 
from  the  bottom  up  as  well.  This  will  require  that 
most  documents  be  "scrutinized  upside-down," 
as  E.P.  Thompson  (1978:  157)  recommends,  and 
that  we  continue  to  give  priority  to  material 
expressions,  in  order  to  focus  on  working  class 
motivations.  We  must  do  this  if  we  are  to 
provide  a  balanced  view  of  past  life. 

In  a  particularly  well-published  example  of 
class  analysis  of  material  culture  outside  the 
workplace,  Mark  Leone  and  others  at  Historic 
Annapolis,  Inc.,  have  explored  the  ideological 
function  of  William  Paca's  garden  (Leone  1984. 
1986,  1987,1988a,  1988b;  Leone  et  al.  1989).  Paca 
was  a  lawyer  and  jurist,  a  signer  of  the 
Declaration  of  Independence,  and  the  Governor 
of  Maryland  from  1782  to  1785 — by  any  standard 
of  measurement,  he  was  a  member  of  that 
state's  economic  and  cultural  elite  (Malone  1946: 
123-124).  Analysis  of  Paca's  reconstructed 
formal  garden  has  centered  around  the 
symbolism  of  power  over  nature,  as  a  metaphor 
for  power  relations  in  society.  In  a  critique  of  the 
role  of  ideology  in  the  work  of  Marxian 
archaeologists,  Ian  Hodder  (1986:  61-70)  uses 


Tobacco  and  Working-Class  Culture    213 


Leone's  research  on  the  Paca  Garden  to 
illustrate  four  problems  in  the  treatment  of 
ideology : 

1.  "There  is  no  indication  anywhere  that  the  same 
material  culture  may  have  different  meanings  and 
different  ideological  effects  for  different  social 
groups"  (Hodder  1986:  65).  The  assumption  is  that 
all  of  Annapolis  shared  Paca's  view  of  the  garden. 

2.  There  is  a  tendency  to  oppose  social  reality  and 
ideology,  with  the  latter  falsifying,  "naturalizing 
or  masking  inequalities  in  the  social  order" 
(Hodder  1986  65).  Rather  than  obscuring  Paca's 
elite  status,  his  garden  would  appear  instead  to 
emphasize  it. 

3.  Insufficient  attention  is  paid  to  the  specific 
historical  context  in  which  the  garden  is  supposed 
to  have  served  its  ideological  function. 

4.  The  linkage  between  the  functions  of  ideologies 
and  their  purported  products  is  not  well  drawn. 
"One  is  left  with  the  question,  where  does  the 
particular  ideology. ..come  from?"  (Hodder  1986: 
69).  For  example,  the  principles  of  perspective 
that  Leone  sees  as  serving  the  social  function  of 
legitimating  Paca's  dominant  position  in  society 
are  within  a  historical  tradition  of  landscape 
construction  that  can  ultimately  be  traced  back  to 
the  Classical  world.  These  concepts  of  order  may 
have  played  a  role  in  creating  Paca's  aspirations, 
as  much  as  they  were  a  tool  for  realizing  them. 

These  problems  with  the  treatment  of  ideology 
have  important  implications  for  an  archaeology 
of  social  class.  In  regard  to  the  first  problem,  one 
of  the  most  disconcerting  features  of  analyses  of 
Paca's  garden  is  their  treatment  of  the  role  of 
ideology  in  class  relations.  They  rely  on  the 
"Dominant  Ideology  Thesis,"  drawn  from  Louis 
Althusser's  (1971)  essay  on  the  function  of 
ideology  on  the  state  level,  which  holds  that  the 
ideologies  of  the  dominant  groups  in  society  are 
imposed  on  submissive  groups.  This  thesis 
denies  subordinate  groups  the  ability  to 
formulate  their  own  ideologies  and  has  been 
found  to  be  subject  to  many  exceptions  when 
measured  against  historical  situations 
(Abercrombie  et  al.  1980;  Miller  1987:  162-163; 
McGuire  1988:  439-440;  Rojek  1989:  100-101). 
The  result  is  a  "trickle  down"  model  of 
relationships  between  the  classes,  a  model  that 
tends  to  deny  the  very  existence  of  a  working- 
class  culture. 

The  problem  seems  to  be  that  Leone's 
analyses  have  examined  only  Paca  and  his 
activities  and  motivations,  ignoring  those  of  the 
"ruled."  For  example,  if  we  assume  an 
ideological  content  for  Paca's  garden,  why  not 
for  every  other  garden,  formal  or  otherwise,  in 
Annapolis.  The  consideration  of  common 
dooryard  gardens  and  their  symbolism  would  be 
much  more  relevant  to  the  material  lives  of  most 


Annapolitans.  All  gardens  may  be  considered  to 
be  "power  gardens"  (cf.  Leone  et  al.  1989),  in  that 
they  manipulate  the  environment  toward  a 
social  end — in  this  sense,  most  if  not  all  artifacts 
are  powerful.  But  we  must  be  careful  not  to 
equate  the  powers  of  artifacts  with  the  power  of 
their  owners  or  users. 

Hodder's  critique  of  Leone's  treatment  of  the 
specific  historical  context  of  the  garden  may 
arise  from  the  fact  that  Leone's  analyses  have 
never  been  published  in  the  form  of  a  report  or 
monograph,  but  exist  instead  as  journal  articles 
emphasizing  different  aspects  of  his  argument. 
When  a  final  report  is  produced,  it  will  no  doubt 
present  much  information  of  the  kind  that 
Hodder  felt  was  lacking,  as  well  as  empirical 
data  on  Paca's  garden  and  the  other  Annapolis 
gardens  that  Leone  has  discussed.  Certainly  one 
context  of  the  garden  that  must  be  considered  in 
depth  is  that  of  Paca's  family  status.  As  the 
garden  was  built  in  about  1765  (Leone  1987:  615), 
within  a  few  years  of  Paca's  1763  marriage  to 
Mary  Chew,  whose  family  possessed  "a  very 
considerable  fortune"  (Maryland  Gazette,  June 
2,  1763,  quoted  in  Malone  1946:  123),  the  garden 
may  be  as  much  a  function  of  power 
relationships  within  the  Paca  household  as 
outside  it.  Family  relationships  may  be 
particularly  significant,  as  analysis  of  formal 
gardens  elsewhere  in  the  Middle  Atlantic  region 
indicates  that  they  may  have  served  a  symbolic 
role  as  a  metaphor  for  the  growth  of  families 
over  generations  (e.g.,  Yentsch  et  al.  1987:  24- 
25) — and  as  there  is  fairly  conclusive  evidence 
that  horticultural  pursuits  were  within  the 
"women's  sphere"  in  18th-century  domestic  life 
(Weber  1989).  In  any  case,  there  is  no  need  to 
assume  that  gardens,  or  other  artifacts,  are 
capable  of  serving  only  one  symbolic  function, 
and  a  good  deal  of  reason  to  assume  that  they 
can  mediate  a  variety  of  meanings,  often 
simultaneously. 

It  is  clear  that  the  "Dominant  Ideology 
Thesis"  implies  a  degree  of  social  control  on  the 
part  of  elites  that  makes  it  particularly 
unsuitable  as  a  model  for  class  relationships  in 
developed,  industrialized  societies.  What  is 
needed  is  a  class-based  model  of  relationships 
within  and  between  subcultures  that  is  flexible 
enough  to  account  for  the  accommodations  of 
interest  that  in  fact  occur  among  and  between 
social  classes  and  ethnic  groups  (and  that  can  be 
demonstrated  to  have  occurred  in  the  historical 
past).  One  framework  that  appears  to  have  the 
potential  to  subsume  complex  processes  of 
cultural  change  involving  class,  ethnic  and 
gender  groups  has  been  used  extensively  by 
British  students  of  popular  culture  (e.g.,  Bennett 


214    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


et  al.  1981,  1986;  Hargreaves  1989).  This  is  the 
notion  of  "cultural  hegemony,"  adapted  from 
the  work  of  the  Italian  marxist,  Antonio  Gramsci. 

Gramsci  was  expressly  concerned  with  the 
tendency  of  "scientific"  marxism  to  view 
ideology  as  a  passive  reflection  of  an  economic 
substructure,  rather  than  as  a  "real"  entity, 
active  in  its  own  right.  According  to  Gramsci, 
members  of  social  classes  put  forth  competing 
ideologies,  centered  around  what  they  perceive 
to  be  their  own  interests.  Class  relationships 
consist  of  the  negotiation  of  these  ideologies  in 
the  cultural  arena.  Symbols  may  be  adopted 
and  manipulated  by  the  members  of  different 
groups,  in  a  process  through  which  each  group 
"seeks  to  negotiate  opposing  class  cultures  onto 
a  cultural  and  ideological  terrain  which  wins  for 
it  a  position  of  leadership"  (Bennett  1986:  xv). 

"Hegemony,"  then,  is  an  ever-shifting 
"prevailing  consciousness,"  negotiated  among 
interest  groups,  that  is  internalized  or  accepted 
to  varying  degrees  by  members  of  those  groups 
(Boggs  1976:  39).  Raymond  Williams  (1977:  110) 
sees  hegemony  as  transcending  what  is 
traditionally  defined  as  ideology,  to  include 
experience  as  well: 

It  [hegemony]  is  a  whole  body  of  practices  and 
expectations,  over  the  whole  of  living:  our  senses 
and  assignments  of  energy,  our  shaping  perceptions 
of  ourselves  and  our  world.  It  is  a  lived  system  of 
meanings  and  values — constitutive  and 
constituting — which  as  they  are  experienced  as 
practices  appear  as  reciprocally  confirming.  It  thus 
constitutes  a  sense  of  reality  for  most  people  in  the 
society,  a  sense  of  absolute  because  experienced 
reality  beyond  which  it  is  very  difficult  for  most 
members  of  the  society  to  move,  in  most  areas  of 
their  lives.  It  is,  that  is  to  say,  a  'culture,'  but  a 
culture  which  has  also  to  be  seen  as  the  lived 
dominance  and  subordination  of  particular  classes. 

Discussions  of  "lived"  hegemonies,  then,  must 
involve  detailed  examination  of  the  historical 
contexts  in  which  they  arose  and  operated. 

A  model  based  on  cultural  hegemony  rather 
than  dominant  ideology  has  several  advantages. 
First,  it  does  not  equate  economic  or  political 
domination  with  social  or  cultural  domination. 
For  example,  while  elites  may  control  much  of 
the  economic  and  political  structures,  it  may  be 
the  bourgeoisie  that  has  the  most  influence  on 
the  prevailing  consciousness.  Second,  cultural 
hegemony  is  seen  as  based  on  control  through 
consensus  rather  than  coercion.  This  requires 
consideration  of  the  accommodations  reached 
by  parallel,  or  even  opposing,  interests,  as  well  as 
the  equally  important  areas  of  conflict  that  are 
more  easily  and  more  often  studied  (Jones  1977: 
163).  Third,  and  most  important,  hegemony  is 
not  seen  as  ever  being  complete  (Boggs  1976: 
40).    Initiatives  and  contributions  emerge  that 


are  alternate  and  oppositional  to  existing 
hegemonies,  although  usually  framed  in  the 
same  terms  of  discourse,  and  some  of  these  may 
be  negotiated  into  hegemonic  positions 
(Williams  1977:  114).  Thus,  contributions  from 
the  working  classes  may  find  acceptance,  or  at 
least  toleration,  by  the  bourgeoisie  and  elites. 
This  allows  working-class  ideology  and  working- 
class  culture  creative,  active  roles  in  the  social 
process,  rather  than  viewing  them  as  dictated  by 
and  distilled  from  the  ideologies  and  cultures  of 
politically  or  economically  dominant  groups. 

The  idea  of  cultural  hegemony  is  fully 
compatible  with  the  communication-centered 
model  for  material  culture  that  was  outlined 
above,  and  therein  lies  its  usefulness  to 
archaeology.  An  important  dimension  of 
material  culture  is  its  communicative  function, 
and  much  of  that  function  takes  place  in  the 
day-to-day  negotiation  of  hegemony.  The  18th- 
century  merchant  with  his  matching  dishes  and 
symmetrical  house  and  grounds  and  the  20th- 
century  "punk"  with  his  safety  pins  and 
engineer's  boots  are  equally  involved  in  those 
negotiations,  and  much  of  what  is  recovered 
archaeologically  may  be  seen  as  the  product  of 
hegemonic  discourse,  intentional  or  otherwise. 
In  fact  we  may  see  the  range  of  items  available 
at  any  given  time,  with  their  varying  moral  and 
symbolic  values,  as  extensions  of  contemporary 
hegemony — or  even  as  a  "material  hegemony" 
that  is  every  bit  as  shifting  and  fluid  through 
time  as  is  cultural  hegemony. 

A  class-based  archaeology  based  on  cultural 
hegemony  permits  us  to  interpret  our  material 
in  its  communicative  and  symbolic  aspects,  and 
opens  up  new  avenues  for  inquiry.  For  example, 
if  Gcorgianization  was  the  cultural  contribution 
of  the  merchant  class  during  the  18th  century,  as 
several  archaeologists  have  recently  proposed 
(Leone  1988b;  Harrington  1989),  then  it  may  be 
viewed  as  an  element  in  hegemonic  discourse. 
While  we  could  simply  note  that 
Gcorgianization  occurs  fairly  universally  across 
that  class,  it  would  be  much  more  interesting 
and  informative  to  go  beyond  this  normative 
viewpoint  to  examine  the  ways  in  which  other 
classes  and  cultural  groups  adopted,  changed,  or 
rejected  the  Georgian  world-view  and  its 
associated  material  culture — to  examine  where 
Gcorgianization  came  from,  how  it  became 
hegemonic  in  the  18th  century,  what  it  meant 
and  how  those  meanings  changed  over  time, 
how  and  by  what  it  was  superseded  in  the 
hegemony,  when  and  why  it  re-entered  the 
hegemony  in  "revivals,"  and  what  remains  of  it 
today. 


Tobacco  and  Working-Class  Culture    215 


The  present  study  will  view  tobacco  use  as  an 
element  of  hegemonic  discourse  between 
classes  and  ethnic  groups,  as  well  as  between 
men  and  women.  The  focus  is  on  the  19th  and 
early  20th  centuries,  although  both  earlier  and 
later  tobacco  use  is  both  interesting  and 
relevant.  While  tobacco  use  may  seem  a  minor 
area  in  which  to  approach  major  issues  of  class 
relations,  those  relations  penetrated  daily  life 
and  were  interwoven  with  its  threads.  Class 
provided,  and  provides,  contours  for  the  surfaces 
of  everyday  activities  and  interactions,  such  that 
its  operation  may  be  seen  in  the  most  mundane 
and  trivial  actions. 

The  episodes  of  tobacco  use  that  are  found  in 
the  historical  record  are  analysed  along  three 
major  dimensions  (after  Mercer  1986:  54,  who 
modified  the  procedure  from  Foucault  1972:  50- 
55).  The  first  of  these  is  the  site  of  use — the 
position,  in  space,  in  time  and  in  social  context, 
in  which  the  episode  occurs.  The  second 
dimension  considered  is  that  of  the  status  of  the 
event — who  the  actors  are,  and  their  relative 
positions  in  structures  of  authority.  Finally,  the 
subjectivities  of  the  behavior — the  meanings 
that  are  conveyed — are  considered  wherever 
they  are  accessible. 

The  material  record,  or  at  least  that  portion  of 
it  that  came  from  the  backlots  of  what  were  once 
the  James  Street  boardinghouses,  is  viewed  as 
part  of  a  hegemonic  discourse  that  has  much  to 
tell  us  that  is  not  illuminated  by  the 
documentary  record,  as  well  as  much  that  is. 
The  material  adds  a  texture,  a  reality,  to  the 
surfaces  of  the  past  that  are  revealed  in  print, 
filling  out  what  Raymond  Williams  (1977:  110) 
called  "the  whole  substance  of  lived  identities 
and  relationships."  Material  is  not  seen  here  as 
just  a  passive  product  of  economic  behavior,  but 
as  an  instrumental  component  of  symbolic 
actions.  The  fact  that  symbolic  behaviors  are 
ephemeral  makes  their  material  traces  that 
much  more  important. 


Even  today,  tobacco  communicates. 
Cigarettes,  cigars,  pipe  tobacco,  chewing 
tobacco,  and  snuff  are  all  more  or  less  accepted 
ways  of  taking  tobacco,  depending  on  where  the 
user  is  and  the  circles  in  which  he  or  she  moves. 
Each  allows  us  to  make  a  statement  about  our 
identity,  about  how  we  would  prefer  to  be  seen 
by  others,  as  well  as  about  the  company  we  keep. 
With  our  choices  in  clothing,  food,  and  shelter, 
and  our  speech,  the  form  of  tobacco  we  use  (or 


even  the  fact  that  we  abstain),  makes  up  a 
portion  of  the  image  that  we  present  to  the  rest 
of  society.  In  short,  tobacco  use  is  part  of 
appearential  ordering,  part  of  our  presentation 
of  self. 

Since  the  First  World  War,  when  cigarettes 
were  first  issued  to  the  military,  they  have  gained 
a  progressively  larger  share  of  the  tobacco 
market.  To  the  extent  that  they  have  done  this, 
cigarettes  have  relegated  many  other  forms  of 
tobacco  to  the  role  of  symbols  of  regional 
cultural  identity.  In  America  at  least,  cigarettes 
began  as  a  predominantly  middle  and  upper 
class  form  of  expression,  more  favored  by 
women  than  men.  Until  the  invention  and 
widespread  introduction  of  high  volume 
cigarette  rolling  machines  in  the  late  19th 
century,  other  forms  of  tobacco  consumption 
were  more  common  (Heimann  1960:  212). 
Tobacco  use  may  still  be  a  means  of 
communicating  implicit  and  explicit  statements 
about  social  class,  gender  relationships,  and 
ethnicity,  but  my  contention  is  that  it  was  much 
more  often  used  as  such  before  the  boom  in 
cigarette  use. 

During  the  16th,  17th,  and  18th  centuries, 
pipes  made  from  white  ball  clay  were  by  far  the 
most  prevalent  type  on  both  sides  of  the  Atlantic. 
The  introduction  of  other  materials,  such  as 
meerschaum,  a  rare  mineral  found  in  Asia 
Minor,  had  little  impact  on  the  popularity  of 
"clays."  Meerschaum  was  more  fragile  and 
much  more  expensive  than  clay,  which  limited 
its  use  to  all  but  the  wealthiest  smokers.  It  was 
not  until  the  introduction  of  sturdier  and  more 
reasonably  priced  brier  pipes  in  the  1850s,  and 
the  introduction  of  the  cigar  from  Spain  and  the 
Spanish  colonies  later  in  the  century,  that  the 
predominance  of  clay  pipes  was  threatened. 

In  the  meantime,  clay  pipes  had  been 
changing.  From  the  16th  century  on,  bowls 
steadily  became  larger  (Oswald  1951),  and  stems 
grew  longer.  By  the  early  18th  century, 
"alderman"  pipes,  with  18-inch  stems,  were  in 
use.  By  the  close  of  the  century, 
"churchwardens,"  more  than  two  feet  in  length, 
were  being  manufactured,  although  most  of  the 
pipes  in  use  were  considerably  snorter  (Walker 
1977:  13).  After  the  introduction  of  moderately 
priced  brier  pipes  in  the  1850s,  which  provided 
the  middle  class  with  an  alternative  to  hot- 
smoking  clays,  the  clay  pipe  itself,  however  short 
or  long  the  stem,  came  to  be  identified  with  the 
working  classes. 

As  a  form  of  behavior,  tobacco  use  has  some 
unique  aspects  that  should  be  taken  into 
account.  First  and  foremost,  although  tobacco  is 
often      mentioned      in      connection      with 


236    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


"flashpoints"  of  class,  ethnic,  and  gender 
conflict,  it  is  rarely  the  source  of  the  conflict. 
Often  instead  tobacco  use  is  mentioned  to  mark, 
or  identify,  the  actual  source  of  conflict  for  the 
reader,  who  is  generally  assumed  to  be  of  similar 
background  to  the  writer.  This  marking  is  a 
function  of  the  symbolic  values  that  were 
attached  to  the  smoking  act,  and  which  form 
identifiable  patterns. 

Another  potential  source  of  information  is,  of 
course,  the  archaeological  record.  In  the  course 
of  tobacco  use,  people  interact  with  and  modify 
material  culture,  and  their  behavior  may  be 
approached  through  its  material  remains.  That 
this  is  rarely  done  is  the  result  of  several  factors 
discussed  below,  factors  that  have  combined  to 
form  a  sizable  "blind  spot"  in  the  analysis  and 
interpretation  of  archaeologically  recovered  clay 
pipes. 


"Workingman's  Cutties" 

In  July  1889,  the  residents  of  Elm  Street,  on 
Worcester's  fashionable  West  Side,  were 
reportedly  ecstatic.  A  vacant  lot  in  their 
neighborhood  was  sold  to  a  local  industrialist 
who  wanted  to  build  a  home,  putting  an  end  to 
fears  that  Leonard  Harrington,  the  previous 
owner,  would  attempt  to  erect  a  tenement  there. 
Harrington  was  already  unpopular  for  his 
practice  of  renting  the  other  half  of  the  duplex  in 
which  he  lived  to  "representatives  of  all  nations," 
whose  behavior  scandalized  their  more 
respectable  neighbors. 

At  one  time  a  family  of  French  [Canadian]  people 
"lived  in  the  house.  The  men  folk  sat  around  the 
house  and  on  the  front  doorsteps  in  their 
shirtsleeves  and  smoked  white  clay  pipes,  and  of 
course  that  did  not  tend  to  soften  the  feeling  of 
discontent  among  the  neighbors  that  the 
Harringtons  were  lowering  the  tone  of  that 
particular  section  of  the  city  (Worcester  Sunday 
Telegram,  7  July  1889,  p.  6,  emphasis  added). 

In  this  case  it  was  probably  the  deshabille  of 
the  offenders  in  such  a  public  setting  and  the 
fact  that  they  took  their  leisure  in  full  view  that 
upset  their  neighbors.  In  fictional  treatments, 
the  sight  of  a  man  in  shirtsleeves  on  a  front 
doorstep  was  grounds  to  sell  one's  house  and 
move  to  a  better  neighborhood  (cf.  Whitchill 
1968:  119-120).  Although  it  may  appear  that  the 
white  clay  pipes  were  in  themselves  offensive,  it 
is  more  likely  that  they  were  mentioned  only  to 
remind  the  reader  that  Harrington's  tenants 
were  members  of  the  working  class  and  thus  out 
of  place  on  the  West  Side.  By  the  1880s,  clay 
pipes  were  solidly  established  as  the 
workingman's  preferred  mode  of  smoking. 


During  the  18th  century,  short-stemmed  clay 
pipes  became  popular  among  the  working 
classes  (Fresco-Corbu  1964),  probably  because 
they  could  be  easily  smoked  while  working,  while 
pipes  with  longer  stems  would  prove  unwieldy. 
Short  pipes  became  known  as  "cutty  pipes"  or 
"cutties"  to  the  Scots  and  British  (from  the  1770s) 
(Oxford  English  Dictionary  II:  1296  [hereafter 
OED]),  while  the  Irish  referred  to  them  as 
"dhudeens"  (Walker  1977:  14).  A  British 
meerschaum  smoker,  writing  as  "Caius"  in  the 
1830s,  described  a  porter  that  he  hired  to  carry 
his  portmanteau  from  the  coach  office  to  his 
hotel  as  "smoking  from  a  short  pipe  the  whole 
way"  ("Caius"  1836:  386).  The  distinction 
between  long  and  short-stemmed  clay  pipes 
clearly  involved  a  social  differentiation  as  well;  a 
later  writer  commented  on  this,  as  well  as  on  the 
popularity  of  clays  in  Britain  on  the  eve  of  the 
First  World  War: 

The  old  pipe  rack,  with  its  long  row  of 
churchwardens  and  Broseleys — at  one  time  an 
indispensable  fitting  in  most  bar-parlours — has 
vanished.  These  pipes  survived  long  after  the 
sixties  of  the  last  century  and  the  advent  of 
meerschaums  and  briars.  Professional  men  and 
tradesmen  met  nightly  to  smoke  their  long  pipes 
and  to  discuss  scandal  and  affairs  of  state.  By  an 
unwritten  law  working-men  and  their  habiliments 
were  excluded,  except  under  the  wing  of  a  protector. 
He  was  a  bold  man  who  would  enter  with  a  short 
clay  pipe  in  his  mouth.  This  curious  notion 
concerning  the  appearance  of  the  short  clay  still 
exists,  although  the  enormous  quantity  of  them  sold 
shows  it  is  a  general  favourite  with  smokers 
(Moseley  1913,  emphasis  added). 

Indeed  the  churchwarden,  "beloved  of  Carlyle 
and  Tennyson,"  was  easily  distinguishable  from 
the  "short  clays  of  the  farmhands  and  other 
labourers"  (Anonymous  1913;  Prideaux  1913). 

Figure  11-1,  Henry  R.  Robinson's  lithograph, 
'The  Smokers,"  provides  a  satirical  American 
view  of  the  class  differences  involved  in  smoking 
behavior  during  the  19th  century  (the  lithograph 
is  dated  1837).  Two  Black  laborers,  a  chimney 
sweep  and  a  bootblack,  discuss  the  relative 
social  and  economic  merits  of  "half  Spanish" 
cigars,  and  those  made  entirely  from  domestic 
leaf.  On  the  right,  a  gentleman  in  top  hat  and 
tails  exclaims,  '"I  follow  in  the  footsteps  of  my 
illustrious  predecessor,'  the  greatest  and  best, 
and  smoke  a  pipe."  Indeed  the  pipe  is  a 
churchwarden  nearly  as  long  as  the  smoker's 
arm.  The  smoker  is  seated  on  a  chair,  with  his 
legs  crossed — as  if  to  emphasize  the 
ridiculousness  of  attempting  to  smoke  such  a 
pipe  on  the  street!  By  contrast,  a  silent  figure  on 
the  extreme  left  goes  about  his  work  in  his 
shirtsleeves,  with  a  hod  on  his  shoulder.  He  is 
also  smoking  a  clay  pipe,  but  one  that  projects 


Tobacco  and  Working-Class  Culture    217 


o 

u 

u 

rj 

■ 

O 

C    fr 

y    fl 

»-    i_ 

<   X. 

.  1j 

' 

f^    u 

o   - 

3 

J=  c- 

03      l- 

</> 

*-   o 
o  ^ 

* 

-    y 

y 

E  S  =  « 

~  Z 
.S  t 

0 

ȣ='; 

•S  3 

q   o 

j*'- 

DC  U 

IS 

a^  » 

£: 

"-C  <i  . 

O   X 

$ 

Ij 

Sfca- 

s  ,  u 

U 

r~~~-' 

>h 

to    o 

^   > 

£  .2 

B^ 

•< 

3  =r 

218    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


only  a  few  inches  from  his  mouth.  The  class 
message  is  clear — gentlemen  smoke  long  pipes, 
laborers  smoke  short  ones.  The  lithograph 
vividly  illustrates  that  acts  of  tobacco 
consumption  carried  with  them  symbolic  import, 
serving  to  reinforce  class  and  ethnic  distinctions, 
to  the  extent  that  they  could  be  stereotypical. 

As  the  19th  century  progressed,  the 
identification  of  clay  pipes  with  the  working 
classes  became  more  pronounced.  An  1869 
article  surveyed  clay  pipes  of  different  materials 
and  observed  that  in  the  category  of  white  clay 
pipes  one  would  include  "the  'common  run'  of 
democratic  or  workingman's  clay  pipes" 
(Anonymous  1869:  147).  A  forward-looking  1897 
author  saw  an  evolution  towards  greater 
"spiritualizing  of  smoking.. .in  the  change  from 
the  blackened  'cutty7  of  the  laborer  to  the  light, 
quickly  consumed,  neat,  and  delicate  cigarette" 
(Anonymous  1897).  In  1903  it  was  observed  that 
"in  almost  every  cigar  shop  window  [in  New 
York],  in  the  mouth  of  every  third  laborer 
met. ..this  snow  white  little  instrument  of  comfort 
and  amusement  may  be  seen"  (Anonymous 
1903). 

Clays  were  favored  not  only  by  laborers,  but  by 
skilled  workers  as  well.  When  Sherlock  Holmes 
went  undercover  in  'The  Adventure  of  Charles 
Augustus  Milverton,"  he  did  so  as 

a  plumber  with  a  rising  business.. .a  rakish  young 
workman,  with  a  goatee  beard  and  a  swagger, 
[who]  lit  his  clay  pipe  at  the  lamp  before 
descending  into  the  street  (Doyle  1963:  166). 

Doyle  certainly  understood  the  importance  of 
the  pipe  as  a  symbol  in  the  presentation  of  self 
and  used  it  as  a  brilliant  device  to  convey  the 
authenticity  of  Holmes'  disguise  as  well  as  the 
effectiveness  of  his  attention  to  detail. 

Economic  factors  certainly  played  a  role  in 
dissuading  the  working  classes  from  following 
the  middle  class  in  the  direction  of  briers  and 
meerschaums.  Clay  pipes  were  far  and  away  the 
least  expensive.  In  1869,  clay  pipes  cost  between 
50  cents  and  $1.20  per  gross,  briers  cost  between 
$5.00  and  $25.00  per  gross  in  Europe,  prior  to 
being  shipped  to  America  (where  they  were 
certainly  more  expensive),  and  the  price  of 
meerschaums  was  "always  comparatively  high 
and  may  reach  fabulous,  or  'fancy'  prices" 
(Anonymous  1869).  In  Boston  in  1883,  clay  pipes 
sold  at  retail  for  as  little  as  one  and  two  cents 
each  (Walker  1983:  39). 

Such  economy  could  be  supremely  important. 
The  average  Lowell  mill  worker's  wage  in  1900 
was  $0.10  per  hour,  or  $6.20  per  week  (Brown 
1976:  148n).  At  about  this  time,  the  average  price 
for  brier  pipes  listed  in  the  Sears,  Roebuck  and 
Company  catalogue  was  nearly  $1.25,  and  the 


cheapest  block  meerschaum  pipe  was  $2.83,  an 
amount  that  exceeded  the  weekly  room  and 
board  fees  at  the  boardinghouses  (Sears, 
Roebuck  and  Company  1908:  1044-1046;  see  also 
chapters  by  Bond  and  Landon,  this  volume). 
Under  such  circumstances,  it  is  understandable 
why  a  working-class  smoker  might  prefer  as 
inexpensive  a  pipe  as  possible. 

Economy,  however,  was  not  be  the  sole  motive 
behind  workingmen's  preference  for  short  clay 
pipes.  Just  as  the  middle  class  used  pipes  to 
determine  who  should  be  included  in  their 
gatherings,  so  could  the  working  classes  use 
them  as  a  signal  of  identity,  even  a  symbol  of 
pride.  This  was  not  lost  on  pipemakers.  All  of  the 
manufacturers  in  Glasgow,  the  major  producers 
of  pipes  for  export,  made  a  "workman"  model  of 
pipe  by  1900 — W.  White  &  Son  made  a 
"Workman's  Cutty" — most  also  made  "Miner" 
pipes  (Associated  Tobacco  Pipe  Makers'  Society 
of  Scotland  and  Ireland  [hereafter  ATPM]  1900). 
A  mule  spinner  who  appeared  at  his  local  saloon 
with  a  28-inch  churchwarden  might  find  himself 
the  butt  of  his  fellows'  humor. 

A  short  stem  will  result  in  a  hot  smoke,  so 
another  motivation  may  have  been  the  desire  for 
such  an  effect — smoking  for  sensory  stimulation, 
as  much  as  for  the  relaxation  and  reflection  that 
often  motivated  the  middle  class  (Anonymous 
1835:  134-135,  1867:  124;  "Caius"  1836:  386-387) 
Compare  this  with  the  belief  among  Colombian 
mestizo  laborers  that  it  is  "particularly 
pleasurable"  to  smoke  a  cigar  with  the  lit  end 
inside  the  mouth  (Reichel-Dolmatoff  and 
Reichel-Dolmatoff  1961:  198).  There  is  some 
evidence  that  middle-class  smokers  preferred 
milder  tobaccos  than  did  the  working  classes 
(Loftus  1881:  12,  17),  but  on  the  other  hand,  there 
is  also  evidence  evidence  that  while  short 
stemmed  pipes  may  have  smoked  hotter,  they 
"colored,"  or  broke  in,  easier  and  that  once  this 
process  was  complete  they  provided  a  mellow 
smoke  (Anonymous  1868:  26-27;  Machen  1884: 
54). 

One  middle  class  satirist,  writing  in  the  1880s, 
commented  that  short  clay  pipes  were  "light  and 
easy  to  be  carried  in  the  mouth,"  and  that  they 
become  "saturated  with  tobacco,  and  so 
excellently  sweet,"  and  finally  that  they  were 

an  insult  to  "decent  society" — I  considering  "decent 
society"  as  a  filthy  and  obscene  harridan  which 
every  man  docs  well  to  trample  on  and  defy 
(Machen  1884:  54,  emphasis  in  original). 

Some  working-class  smokers  no  doubt  shared 
Machen's  attitude  toward  "decent  society,"  and 
used  short  clays  to  announce  their  presence  to 
the  middle  class  using  an  upsetting  but  easily 
understood  symbol.   In  short,  one  element  of  the 


Tobacco  and  Working-Class  Culture   219 


pleasure  derived  from  short  clays  must  have 
been  the  discomfort  of  others.  This  seeming 
lack  of  concern  for  hegemonic  sensibilities  was  a 
common  working-class  approach  to  class 
relationships  (Meacham  1977:  20-21),  and 
constitutes  an  important  element  of  "style,"  in 
Hebdige's  usage. 

The  fact  is  that  there  simply  is  not  enough 
documentation  from  workers  themselves  on  the 
subject  to  be  able  to  say  for  certain  why  they 
preferred  clay  cutties.  Like  the  laborer  in  Figure 
1,  the  working  classes  themselves  tend  to  be 
silent  in  the  documentary  record.  When  they  do 
speak  in  the  writings  of  the  middle  class,  as  does 
so-called  Caius'  porter,  there  is  an  air  of 
deference  and  acceptance  of  "station" — not 
surprising,  if  he  hoped  for  a  tip! 

In  New  England,  and  probably  elsewhere  in 
America  as  well,  clay  pipes  were  known 
generically  as  T.D.s,  after  the  initials  that 
appeared  as  decorative  elements  on  the  most 
popular  models — the  one  to  two  cent  models 
mentioned  by  Walker's  unnamed  source  as 
coming  from  Scotland  (Walker  1983:  38-39). 
"T.D."  was  apparently  a  generic  name  for  clay 
pipes  as  late  as  1908  (Cooper  1908:  381).  A 
statistical  exploration  of  wholesale  price  and 
labor  cost  information  on  the  two  existing 
Scottish  pipe  lists  (McDougall  n.d.;  ATPM  1900) 
revealed  that  on  the  1875  list,  T.D.  pipe  models 
had  significantly  lower  wholesale  values  than  the 
list  of  types  as  a  whole,  supporting  the 
interpretation  that  their  low  price  was  a  factor  in 
their  popularity  (Cook  1988: 16). 

By  the  early  20th  century,  middle  class  use  of 
the  long-stemmed  pipe  was  taking  place  in  what 
was  apparently  a  ritual  setting,  as  William  L. 
Calver  explained  in  1931: 

Even  in  our  day  the  breakage  of  the 
"Churchwarden"  in  transportation  is  enormous,  and 
the  price  consequently  high.  At  the  annual 
meetings  of  certain  societies,  "Churchwardens"  are 
smoked  by  the  members  present  and  their  guests. 
With  due  care  the  pipes  used  are  borne  to  the 
homes  of  the  smokers,  and  are  there  deposited  with 
other  implements  of  their  kind — a  ceramic  record  of 
the  smokes  of  other  years  (Calver  1950:  287). 

Unfortunately,  neither  the  names  nor  the 
purpose  of  those  "certain  societies"  is  provided, 
but  it  is  likely  that  at  the  time  that  Calver  was 
writing,  clay  pipes  were  rapidly  being  replaced 
by  cigarettes  among  the  working  class.  What  is 
clear  about  the  middle  class  preference  for  long- 
stemmed  clay  pipes  is  that  it  derived  from  their 
relation  to  what  Veblen  called  "conspicuous 
leisure."  The  very  fact  that  one  could  do  no 
menial  work  while  smoking  a  pipe  with  a  24-inch 
stem  implies  that  one  could  afford  the  time  to  do 
nothing    (cf.    Veblen    1899:    43).      It    is    also 


informative  to  look  at  artificiality  of  pipe 
materials  and  the  degree  of  mechanization 
involved  in  their  manufacture.  Clay  must  be 
substantially  altered  to  be  useful,  and  clay  pipes 
were  mass-produced,  albeit  largely  through 
manual  labor  (Anonymous  1852).  Briers  and 
meerschaums  on  the  other  hand  are  of  natural 
material,  unmodified  except  in  the  carving 
process,  which  must  be  done  by  hand,  increasing 
their  value  as  status  goods  (cf.  Fussell  1983:  52- 
53,  73). 

What  is  most  interesting  about  the  expression 
of  class  differences  through  pipe  preferences  is 
that  it  does  not  appear  to  be  a  source  of  overt 
class  conflict.  When  they  appear  in  situations  of 
actual  conflict  (as  in  Worcester  in  the  1880s)  or 
potential  conflict  (had  any  laborers  attempted  to 
horn  in  on  Moseley's  gossiping  tradesmen  in  the 
1860s),  clay  pipes  are  present  more  as  a  visible 
symbol  of  the  class  differences  that  underlie  the 
conflict,  rather  than  as  objects  of  contention  in 
and  of  themselves. 

Unlike  drinking,  smoking  among  the  working 
class  was  often  viewed  by  middle  class  writers  as 
something  held  in  common  across  class 
boundaries.  "Caius,"  writing  in  the  1830s,  was 
careful  to  point  out  the  difference  between 
"smokers"  who  enjoyed,  and  "puffers"  who 
merely  followed  habit,  designations  that  he 
allowed  could  be  independent  of  class.  One 
anonymous  humorist  observed  that  both  the 
immigrant  "from  the  Emerald  Isle  with  his  short 
dhudeen"  and  the  "west  End  exquisite,  with  his 
real  Havannah"  contributed  their  share  of 
smoke  to  the  London  fog  (Anonymous  1842:  66). 

Where  smoking  engenders  conflict  it  is  more 
often  a  matter  of  disagreement  over  the 
appropriateness  of  public  versus  private 
performance  of  certain  actions.  In  short, 
working  class  leisure  often  involved  recreation 
and  relaxation,  including  drinking  and  smoking, 
in  public  places,  such  as  streets,  saloons,  and 
public  parks,  while  the  middle  class  preferred 
that  such  activities  take  place  indoors.  The 
friction  generated  by  conflicting  notions  of 
proper  behavior  led  the  middle  class  to  attempt 
to  legislate  their  concepts  of  correct  behavior, 
and  was  a  major  factor  in  the  residential 
segregation  that  characterized  the  industrial  city 
(cf.  Rosenzweig  1983).  The  British  and  New 
England  standard  of  propriety  held  that 

A  gentleman  should  as  soon  be  seen  eating  his 
dinner  in  the  public  streets,  as  smoking  a  segar  [sic]. 
Both  are  proper  in  their  places;  and  both  may 
become,  in  some  situations,  worse  than  ridiculous. 
(Anonymous  1835: 134) 

and  that 


220    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


It  is  vulgar  to  smoke  in  the  streets  and  parks, 
(unless  in  a  very  secluded  part  of  the  latter,). ..The 
linen-drapers'  shopmen,  el  id  genus  omne,  delight 
in  strutting  with  segars  in  Regent  Street;  and  what 
gentleman  smoker  wishes  to  be  identified  with 
such?  ("Caius"  1836: 387) 

As  late  as  the  1880s,  one  could  be  "too  much  of  a 
gentleman  to  smoke  on  the  public  thoroughfare, 
or  in  the  immediate  presence  of  ladies"  (Gould 
1886-1887:511). 

These  conceptions  of  proper  behavior  varied 
according  to  region,  as  well  as  according  to  class. 
John  Richard  Dennett,  who  visited  the  North 
Carolina  legislature  immediately  after  the  Civil 
War,  remarked  upon  several  members  smoking 
(long  stemmed  pipes,  of  course)  during  an 
address.  Another  member  removed  a  quid  of 
tobacco  from  his  mouth  and  held  it  in  his  hand 
while  speaking,  that  he  might  speak  more 
clearly!  Dennett  (who  was  from  Massachusetts) 
observed  that  such  behavior,  "in  a  Northern 
assemblage  of  similar  character,  would  have 
provoked  animadversion  or  laughter"  (Dennett 
1965: 157). 

By  the  mid-20th  century,  tobacconists  and 
others  could  recommend  clay  pipes  to  the 
serious  connoisseur  as  an  occasional  change 
from  briers  and  other  pipes  (Herment  1955:  20; 
Anonymous  1952).  By  this  time,  clays  had 
apparently  lost  their  symbolic  connections  with 
the  working  classes. 

Tobacco,  with  drinking  and  other  activities, 
was  an  element  in  the  discourse  over  leisure 
behavior.  Alternate  hegemonies  divided  along 
class  lines  contested  control  of  public  space,  and 
smoking  was  one  of  the  weapons  wielded  by  the 
working  classes.  By  the  mid-20th  century  the 
working-class  contribution,  smoking  in  public 
places,  had  become  hegemonic,  illustrating  the 
ability  of  working-class  culture  to  negotiate  at 
least  some  of  its  practices  into  cultural 
dominance 

The  attention  of  social  historians  who  have 
investigated  class  relationships  has  inevitably 
been  drawn  to  points  of  conflict — strikes,  riots, 
and  resistance  to  changing  technologies  in  the 
workplace — what  Gareth  Stedman  Jones  (1977: 
163)  has  called  the  "flashpoints"  between 
classes.  This  is  perfectly  understandable,  as 
open  conflict  of  any  sort  tends  to  be  well 
documented,  especially  if  it  is  ultimately 
mediated  in  the  legal  system,  and  at 
"flashpoints,"  the  issues  and  interests  of 
historical  participants  become  visible  to  the 
historian.  Class  differences  that  do  not  involve 
conflict  are  not  as  easily  visible  and  do  not  call  as 
much  attention  to  themselves. 


Consumption  of  alcohol  was  the  focus  of 
considerable  conflict  between  the  working  class 
and  middle  and  upper  class  interests  throughout 
the  19th  century  and  well  into  the  20th  century. 
Tobacco  consumption  generated  a  fair  amount 
of  rancor  in  some  quarters,  but  the  issue  was  not 
divided  along  the  clear  class  lines  of  the 
temperance  movement.  In  fact,  an  anti- 
smoking  law  in  Utah  failed  during  the  1920s 
because  it  was  aimed  at  an  acceptable  middle 
class  pleasure,  after-dinner  smoking  in 
restaurants.  The  first  (and  only)  arrests  were  of 
several  businessmen  and  a  newspaper 
manager — the  law  was  repealed  at  the 
insistence  of  the  Salt  Lake  Chamber  of 
Commerce,  the  Salt  Lake  Lions  Club,  and  the 
Utah  Manufacturers  Association  (Dillow  1981: 
95, 106-107). 

In  sum,  smoking  in  and  of  itself  was  not  a 
class-based  activity.  There  were,  however, 
distinctively  class-linked  elements  to  smoking 
behavior:  the  smoking  materials  used,  their 
practicality  and  their  cost;  and  the  context  in 
which  smoking  occurred — whether  in  public,  in 
full  view  of  all,  or  in  the  privacy  of  the  study  or 
club  room.  These  aspects  of  material  culture  and 
situation  commanded  contemporary  attention 
to  the  extent  that  they  figure  more  prominently 
in  written  discourse  than  the  everyday  nature  of 
smoking  behavior  would  suggest. 

Part  of  working-class  "style"  may  have 
consisted  of  the  intentional  breaking  of  middle- 
class  rules  that  dictated  the  proper  places  to 
smoke.  Arthur  Machen  felt  that  short  clay  pipes 
were  most  appropriate  "to  be  used  in  the  parks 
and  public  places  for  the  annoyance  of  fools" 
(Machen  1884:  55),  and  there  is  no  reason  to 
believe  that  he  was  alone  in  that  respect.  One 
cannot  help  but  suspect  that  Elm  Street's 
immigrants  derived  a  certain  satisfaction  from 
the  irritation  that  their  attire  and  smoking 
behavior  caused  among  their  more  genteel 
neighbors. 

Tobacco  use  has  aspects  that  set  it  apart  from 
other  means  of  class  expression.  It  sometimes 
appears  in  connection  with  conflicts  between 
classes,  and  although  it  is  seldom  the  cause  of 
conflict  its  presence  and  involvement  offer 
evidence  of  the  ways  in  which  material  items  and 
non-verbal  behavior  communicated  class 
differences.  That  clay  pipes  in  the  mouths  of 
French  Canadian  immigrants  could  figure  so 
prominently  among  the  concerns  of  their 
middle-class  neighbors  testifies  to  the  power  of 
such  commonplace  items  to  become  symbols 
and  to  affect  people  in  unanticipated  ways. 


Tobacco  and  Working-Class  Culture    221 


"Representatives  of  all  Nations" 

Just  as  modes  of  cultural  self-expression 
varied  according  to  class,  they  also  varied  with 
ethnic  background  (e.g.,  Samson  1960).  The 
status  inherent  in  and  the  class  messages 
conveyed  by  different  methods  of  smoking  or 
taking  tobacco  are  cultural  variables  and  are 
interpreted  differently  by  members  of  different 
cultures,  much  as  with  the  consumption  of 
alcohol.  The  ethnic  groups  that  settled  the  New 
World,  either  by  choice,  from  necessity,  or 
against  their  will,  either  brought  distinctive 
tobacco-related  behaviors  with  them  or  adopted 
them  once  here. 

Tobacco  use  in  Europe  began  with  the  Spanish 
and  the  English  and  spread  across  the  continent 
from  those  two  nations.  The  Spanish  tobacco 
tradition  centered  around  the  cigar,  while  the 
British  tradition  centered  around  the  pipe.  To 
some  extent  these  generalizations  may  have 
reflected  the  native  practices  in  the  colonies  of 
each  nation  (Walker  1977:  55). 

Within  the  British  Isles,  there  were  some 
ethnic  differences  that  developed  by  the  early 
17th  century.  Snuff  became  extremely  popular 
in  Scotland  and  Ireland  and  remained  so  in 
Scotland  well  into  the  19th  century  (ibid.:  49).  As 
the  19th  century  progressed,  Scotland  became 
the  primary  manufacturing  center  of  the  United 
Kingdom  for  clay  pipes  for  export,  and  the  Irish 
came  to  be  associated  with  the  Scotch  product. 

By  the  time  that  the  Irish  began  to  arrive  in 
America,  they  were  often  identified  as  smoking 
the  "dhudeen,"  a  particular  Irish  term  for  the 
short-stemmed  clay  pipe.  The  stereotypical 
figure  of  the  "bog-trotter  of  the  Emerald  Isle  with 
his  short  dhudeen,  and  his  mouth  full  of  'taith'" 
(Anonymous  1842:  66),  or  the  "Irish  coal- 
whipper...with  his  dhudheen..."  ("Caius"  1836: 
385)  was  a  familiar  caricature  in  the  mid-19th 
century.  The  image  is  so  strong  to  this  day  that  it 
crops  up  every  Saint  Patrick's  Day  in  the  form  of 
the  Leprechaun — with  the  stem  of  his  pipe  now 
long  and  curved. 

An  article  that  illustrates  a  Canadian 
collection  of  unique  pipes  (Anonymous  1904) 
indicates  that  one  of  the  pipes,  of  white  clay  with 
a  stem  about  four  inches  long,  was  "smoked  by 
A.  Molley  Maguire  [sic]  while  being  hanged." 
Despite  the  apparent  typographical  error,  it  is 
clear  that  the  smoker  in  question  was  a  member 
of  the  Molly  Maguires,  a  secret  society  among 
Irish  immigrants  in  the  Pennsylvania  coalfields. 
The  society,  which  was  active  between  1862  and 
1875,  approached  labor  relations  according  to 
established  Old  World  tradition — by  sending 
anonymous  threatening  letters,  and  by 
blackening  their  faces  and  committing  assaults 


and  offenses  against  property  (Coleman  1936:  47, 
78-91).  The  Molly  Maguires  were  infiltrated  by 
the  Pinkertons,  and  20  were  hanged  in  1877 
(Broehl  1964:  340).  The  presence  of  the  pipe  in 
the  collection  points  up  its  use  as  a  symbol  of 
Irish-American  working-class  solidarity  and 
labor  activism. 

There  is  no  question  but  that  clay  pipes  were 
preferred  by  the  Irish.  This  is  reflected  in  the 
model  names  in  the  Glaswegian  firm  of  Duncan 
McDougall  &  Company's  "Irish  Price  List," 
dated  ca.  1875  (McDougall  &  Co.  n.d.),  and  in 
their  wage  list  of  1900  (ATPM  1900:  5-16).  In  the 
earlier  document,  31  of  the  168  pipe  types  (18.5%) 
appear  to  have  Irish  connotations.  By  about  25 
years  later,  the  percentage  has  dropped  slightly, 
but  69  of  410  types  have  Irish  associations.  The 
"Dublins"  and  "Derries"  in  these  lists  are  are 
almost  certainly  references  to  pipe  shapes,  while 
"Erin  Go  Bragh,"  "Harp,"  and  "Flag  of  Ireland" 
are  more  likely  to  refer  to  decorative  motifs. 
Some  of  the  sentiments,  such  as  "Home  Rule," 
had  political  connotations.  That  such  pipes  were 
actually  made  and  imported  to  the  United  States 
is  borne  out  by  importers'  catalogs  (Sudbury  and 
Pfeiffer  1983:  figure  1),  as  well  as  by  excavated 
examples  (Alexander  1986).  Several  such  pipes, 
including  a  "Home  Rule"  pipe  (see  Figure  10- 
16)  and  an  "Erin/[Wolf]  Tone"  pipe  (see  Figure 
10-18)  were  recovered  from  the  Boott  Mill 
Boardinghouse  excavations,  and  are  discussed 
in  Chapter  10. 

There  is  some  evidence  that  African 
Americans  also  smoked  white  clay  pipes. 
Newspaper  advertisements  in  the  South 
referred  to  clays  as  "Negro  Pipes" — clay  pipe 
fragments  are  frequently  encountered  on  slave 
cabin  sites  (Otto  1984:  76).  The  extent  to  which 
conditions  in  the  South  may  be  applied  to  other 
areas  in  the  country  is  questionable,  although 
clay  pipe  fragments  have  been  recovered  from 
free  Black  sites  in  the  North  as  well  (Geismar 
1982:  143,  224-225).  In  fact,  at  least  one  pipe 
fragment  marked  "[ne]gro  pipe,"  apparently 
made  by  a  London  pipemaker  active  during  the 
second  half  of  the  19th  century,  has  been 
published  (Pfeiffer  1983). 

Immigrants  from  Germany  and  the  Slavic 
areas  of  Eastern  Europe  had  their  own  smoking 
preferences.  Although  the  German  upper 
classes  favored  meerschaums,  the  working 
classes  preferred  composite  pipes,  with  separate 
mouthpieces,  stems,  and  porcelain  bowls 
(Machen  1884:  51;  Walker  1977:  67).  William 
Long,  who  started  business  as  a  tobacconist  in 
Philadelphia  in  1845,  his  inventory  included  six 
"German  pipes,"  valued  at  $.09  each  (Long  n.d.: 
4).  By  the  turn  of  the  century,  such  pipes  were  in 


222    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


common  enough  use  in  this  country  that  Sears 
and  Roebuck  sold  several  varieties,  ranging  in 
price  from  $.79  to  $1.33,  along  with  replacement 
stems  (Sears,  Roebuck  and  Co.  1908:  1045).  A 
smaller  and  less  ornate  pipe  is  shown  in  use  in 
Byington  (1910:  opp.  p.  137). 

As  mentioned  above,  the  Hispanic  tradition 
favored  cigars  over  pipes,  and  it  was  apparently 
through  the  Spanish  colonies  that  the  cigarette 
entered  the  New  World.  In  areas  where  Anglo- 
Americans  and  Hispanic  Americans  came  into 
direct  conflict  over  land  and  resources,  as  in 
California  during  the  1850s,  ethnic  conflict  could 
be  expressed  in  terms  of  tobacco  use.  An  Anglo- 
American  judge  in  early  San  Francisco,  who 
clearly  had  no  liking  either  for  the  "Chillenos"  or 
the  cigarettes  that  they  smoked,  made  his 
sentiments  known  from  the  bench.  One  trial  for 
horse  theft  reportedly  consisted  of  the  following 
exchange: 

"Do  you  smoke  cigarettes?" 

"Si,  senor." 

"Do  you  blow  the  smoke  through  your  nose?" 

"Si,  senor." 

"Then  I  find  you  guilty  as  charged,  and  may  God 

have  mercy  on  your  soul!  Constable,  take  this 

fellow  out  and  shoot  him!  He  stole  that  horse,  sure 

enough!"  (Asbury  1947: 49-50) 

Again,  as  with  class  conflicts,  it  would  appear 
here  that  the  underlying  conflict  is  not  the 
smoking  behavior  in  question,  but  rather  in  its 
ethnic  implications. 

The  smoking  behaviors  of  other  ethnic  groups 
are  more  problematic,  largely  because  of  a 
paucity  of  documentary  evidence.  French- 
Canadians  made  up  a  substantial  percentage  of 
the  workforce  in  New  England  textile 
communities,  including  Lowell.  Although  there 
are  a  few  tantalizing  glimpses,  such  as  the  1889 
Worcester  incident,  that  suggest  that  their 
smoking  behavior  may  have  been  similar  in 
some  respects  to  that  of  their  Anglo-American 
counterparts,  more  research  needs  to  be  done 
on  their  expression  of  ethnicity  through  smoking 
behavior.  We  may  assume,  however,  that  cases 
such  as  that  of  Andre  Beaulieu  are  atypical. 
Beaulieu  preferred  a  corncob  pipe,  and  was 
smoking  nearly  two  packages  of  tobacco  each 
week.  This  attracted  the  attention  of  the  Lowell 
Humane  Society,  which  felt  that  Andre  should 
have  been  cultivating  habits  more  typical  of 
other  three-year-olds.  When  they  confiscated 
his  pipe,  which  he  had  been  smoking  daily  since 
he  was  18  months  of  age,  Andre  "screamed  with 
anger  and  aroused  the  neighborhood."  His 
mother,  who  would  have  been  15  years  old  when 
Andre  was  born,  was  probably  telling  the  truth 
when  "she  claimed  to  be  unaware  that  tobacco 
would  hurt  the  child,"  and  the  Humane  Society 


allowed  him  to  remain  at  home  (New  York 
Times,  15  December  1906:  1).  The  whole  episode 
is  probably  more  indicative  of  a  working-class 
teenage  mother's  desperation  than  of  any  ethnic 
practice. 

A  problem  in  examining  the  relationship 
between  ethnicity  and  smoking  behavior  is  that 
it  is  often  difficult  to  distinguish  between  class 
and  ethnicity.  If  arriving  immigrants  began  life 
in  America  at  the  bottom  of  the  social  and 
economic  scale,  as  many  did,  how  can  one 
determine  the  extent  to  which  ethnicity,  rather 
than  class,  influenced  their  behavior?  Or  for 
that  matter,  how  can  we  be  certain  that  19th- 
century  observers  were  not  interpreting  ethnic 
behavior  as  class  behavior — saying,  for  example 
"laborers,"  when  they  meant  "Irish  laborers"? 
The  answer  is  that  very  often  we  cannot  be 
certain,  and  in  fact  it  is  probably  sufficient  to  be 
aware  that  class  and  ethnicity  are  often  closely 
interrelated,  and  that  both  could  be  symbolically 
mediated  simultaneously,  often  through 
manipulation  of  the  same  objects. 

While  tobacco  use  was  an  element  of  the 
"lived  system  of  meanings  and  values"  of  all 
ethnic  subcultures,  and  thus  formed  part  of  their 
contribution  to  the  hegemonic  discourse,  there 
is  no  evidence  that  ethnic  differences  were  ever 
as  contested  as  class  differences  in  the  domain 
of  smoking  behavior.  Rather  than  the 
"competing  hegemonies"  of  class-based 
behaviors,  ethnic  differences  in  smoking 
behavior  seem  to  have  been  accepted  by  the 
majority  culture  as  legitimate  characteristics  of 
ethnic  subcultures.  In  short,  they  constituted 
"alternate  hegemonies"  in  a  sphere  of  life — 
ethnic  identity — which  was  not  contested 
through  smoking  behavior,  except  where  that 
behavior  was  perceived  as  class-based. 


"No  man  shall  dictate  to  me" 

The  issue  of  gender-based  differences  is  both 
fascinating  and  complex.  The  question  of  how 
many  women  smoked  during  the  late  19th  and 
early  20th  centuries  is  subject  to  many  popular 
misconceptions.  Advertisements  for  Virginia 
Slims  cigarettes  over  the  last  several  decades 
have  attempted  to  place  women's  right  to  smoke 
among  the  goals  of  the  women's  suffrage 
movement.  These  advertisements  are  intended 
to  portray  smoking  as  an  act  of  rebellious  self- 
expression  (by  women  attired  in  the  trappings  of 
the  middle  class)  in  the  face  of  societal 
disapproval — that  is,  to  capitalize  on  the 
renewed  women's  liberation  movement  of  the 
1960s  and  1970s.  In  an  unusual  form  of 
sexploitation,  they  reflect  a  distorted  view  of 


Tobacco  and  Working-Class  Culture    223 


turn-of-the-century  middle  and  upper  class 
attitudes,  through  blatantly  fabricated  vignettes. 
Although  this  kind  of  alteration  of  the  past  can 
occur  unintentionally,  it  is  plain  here  that  the 
intention  was  to  link  the  product  with  a  historical 
activity — resistance  to  irrational  and  petty 
authority — even  if  that  activity  has  to  be 
invented.  In  short,  "we  alter  the  past  to  become 
part  of  it  as  well  as  to  make  it  our  own" 
(Lowenthal  1985:  331) — appropriating  and 
articulating  it  in  the  service  of  present-day  goals. 
The  Virginia  Slims  ads  are  a  clear  example  of 
what  Roland  Barthes  called  the  mythologizing  of 
the      ordinary.  In      Barthes'      terms, 

mythologization  occurs  when  the  normal 
semiotic  relationship  is  duplicated  on  another 
level  (Barthes  1957b:  199-200).  The  symbolic 
act — the  woman  smoking  to  signify  resistance  to 
male  strictures — constituted  a  sign  in  its  original 
context.  Here,  it  has  been  appropriated  in  its 
entirety  as  a  signifier  of  something  else 
altogether — a  brand  of  cigarettes,  or  at  least  the 
desirability  of  smoking  them.  Resistance  has  in 
this  case  been  trivialized  and  neutralized.  So 
what  if  women  make  half  as  much  as  men?  At 
least  they're  allowed  to  smoke  now  (i.e.,  "You've 
come  a  long  way,  baby!").  The  advertisements 
may  even  have  had  the  effect  of  calming  women 
who  were  alarmed  by  the  stridency  of  the 
contemporary  women's  liberation  movement — 
trivializing  past  conflict  makes  the  present 
conflict  seem  less  threatening  (Lowenthal  1985: 
345). 

The  fact  is  that  smoking  was  not  an  arena  in 
which  the  drama  of  suffragism  was  played  out, 
and  few  if  any  suffragettes  expended  their 
energy  on  such  peripheral  topics.  An 
examination  of  any  sample  of  historical  writings 
on  women's  issues  in  the  late  19th  and  early  20th 
centuries  will  indicate  that  if  women  were  forcing 
their  own  arrest  and  being  jailed,  it  was  because 
they  wanted  the  right  to  vote,  not  to  smoke.  Both 
the  open  conflict  over  the  right  to  vote  and  the 
friction  over  tobacco-use  were  forms  of 
resistance  to  male  conceptions  of  what 
constituted  the  women's  sphere  in  society.  As  a 
form  of  symbolic  behavior,  smoking  could  be 
used  by  women  to  bring  essential  issues  into 
view. 

On  21  January,  1908,  New  York  Alderman 
Timothy  "Little  Tim"  Sullivan,  succeeded  in 
passing  an  ordinance  to  prevent  women  from 
smoking  in  public  places.  There  were  some 
questions  about  the  law's  validity,  and  it  was  set 
aside  by  the  Mayor  in  early  February  (New  York 
Times,  21  January  1908:  1;  4  February  1908:  1). 
Although  questions  of  whether  or  not  the 
Aldermen    had    overstepped    their    authority 


provided  the  justification  for  the  mayor's 
decision,  the  reason  was  more  likely  the  law's 
potential  as  a  ground  for  conflict. 

Only  one  person  was  arrested  and  charged  for 
violating  the  "Sullivan  Law."  Two  days  after  the 
law  took  effect,  a  Patrolman  Stern  arrested  29- 
year-old  Katie  Mulcahy  for  lighting  a  cigarette 
on  the  Bowery.  The  accused  refused  to  divulge 
her  address  or  to  pay  the  $5.00  fine.  She  was  led 
away  to  spend  the  night  in  jail,  "carrying  her 
package  of  cigarettes."  Her  parting  words  to  the 
judge  (which  for  some  reason  never  made  it  into 
the  Virginia  Slims  ads)  were  "No  man  shall 
dictate  to  me" — a  singularly  accurate  appraisal 
of  the  ordinance's  intent  (New  York  Times,  23 
January  1908: 1). 

There  is  ample  evidence  that  women  smoked, 
in  both  Britain  and  America,  in  the  17th  and  18th 
centuries  (cf.  "St.  Swithin"  1909;  Hodgkin  1909; 
Heimann  1960:  89).  A  British  writer  remembered 
seeing  "respectable  old  women  smoking 
'churchwardens'  here  and  there  in  country 
places,"  during  the  1850s  (Anonymous  1909),  and 
it  was  apparently  at  about  this  time  that  smoking 
among  women  in  both  Britain  and  America 
began  to  decline  (Heimann  1960:  90).  There  is 
no  evidence  that  it  was  considered  particularly 
daring  or  disgraceful  for  women  to  smoke  before 
mid-century.  In  fact,  the  wives  of  Andrew 
Jackson  and  Zachary  Taylor  both  were  pipe 
smokers  (ibid.:  90). 

The  evidence  for  a  decline  in  smoking  among 
women  is  admittedly  based  on  information 
concerning  the  middle  and  upper  classes  in 
urban  contexts.  By  the  1890s,  smoking  was  not 
an  activity  in  which  "respectable"  women  (or 
men,  for  that  matter)  engaged  while  in  public.  It 
is  difficult  to  say  how  thoroughly,  if  at  all,  this 
ethic  was  adopted  by  working  class  women  and 
by  women  in  rural  areas.  A  broadside  on  the  ill 
effects  of  tobacco  from  the  1870s  or  1880s 
mentions  women  smoking  pipes  in  Ohio 
(Anonymous  1964),  indicating  that  the  practice 
continued  among  some  rural  women. 

There  is  every  reason  to  believe  that  among 
working  class  women  smoking  remained 
popular.  A  British  woman,  herself  a  smoker, 
allowed  that  "among  the  lower  classes  there  are 
a  few  women  who  smoke,"  counting  vendors  of 
fruit  and  fish  among  them,  as  well  as 

the  aged  women  of  the  Negro  and  Celtic  races, 
exemplified  in  the  old  freed  slaves  and  Scotch  and 
Irish  croons,  who  have  led  a  life  half  man-like  in 
toil,  half  brute-like  in  its  obedience  to  unreasoning 
instincts.  (Hunting  1889-1890:  220-222) 

By  contrast,  the  same  author  found  smoking 
prevalent  among  the  upper  classes,  where  "so 
many  keep  [their  smoking]  habit  as  secret  from 


224    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


members  of  their  own  sex  as  from  men," 
although  "in  some  country  houses  it  is  no 
uncommon  thing  for  the  ladies  to  join  the 
gentlemen  in  the  smoking-room,  and  to  mingle 
the  fumes  of  their  dainty,  mild-flavoured 
cigarettes  with  the  more  masculine  cigar  smoke" 
(ibid.:  221,  222).  Women  art  students  and  artists 
were  even  noted  as  smoking  pipes,  including 
clays  (ibid.:  222). 

In  America,  tobacco  use  among  women  was 
subject  to  considerable  regional  variability. 
After  the  Civil  War,  John  Dennett,  a 
Massachusetts  journalist,  noted  pipe  smoking 
and  snuff-dipping  among  white  rural  southern 
women  (Dennett  1965:  96,  117).  A  quarter  of  a 
century  later,  the  latter  practice  either 
continued,  or  was  popularly  considered  to  do  so, 
to  the  extent  that  Hunting  could  refer  to 

those  uncultured  women,  both  rich  and  poor  and  of 
all  ages,  in  the  southern  and  western  parts  of  the 
United  States,  who  indulge  openly  in  streets, 
tramcars  and  theatres  in  the  practice  of  tobacco- 
dipping,  i.e.  dipping  a  short  stick  into  a  box  of  snuff 
and  inserting  it  in  mouth  or  nostril  (Hunting  1889- 
1890:  220). 

In  California,  the  Spanish  tradition  of  tobacco 
use  apparently  won  out.  An  1891  advertisement 
for  A.  Coolot,  a  Sacramento  wholesale 
tobacconist,  lists  68  varieties  of  cigars,  exactly 
half  of  which  are  described  as  "young  ladies' 
cigars"  with  brand  names — "smiles,"  "sweet 
lips,"  "bright  eyes,"  "pansy  blossoms,"  etc — that 
leave  little  doubt  about  their  intended  market. 
Coolot  was  also  described  as  the  sole  West 
Coast  agent  for  the  "Young  Ladies  Standard 
Cigar  Factory,"  which  may  account  for  the 
prominence  of  such  cigars  in  his  line 
(Weinstock,  Lubin  and  Co.  1891:  116-117). 
Nevertheless,  it  is  clear  that  cigars  were  readily 
available  to  women  in  California  and  wherever 
else  the  Young  Ladies'  Standard  Cigar  Factory 
did  business. 

Contrast  this  with  the  Northeast,  where  cigars 
were  not  for  women.  Clearly,  the  ideal  in  the 
region  from  the  mid-19th  century  on  was  that 
middle  and  upper  class  women  did  not  smoke, 
and  that  gentlemen  did  not  smoke  in  their 
presence.  Travelling  through  Georgia  in  1865, 
Dennett,  seeing  cigars  sold  aboard  railway  cars, 
remarked  that  "it  was  assumed  that  the  ladies 
would  make  no  objection  if  they  were  smoked" 
(Dennett  1965:  266).  Elizabeth  Porter  Gould's 
(1885-1886)  discussion  of  college  girls'  attitudes 
towards  smoking  concerns  not  women 
themselves  smoking,  but  rather  their  opinions  of 
men  who  smoked — that  the  women  in  question 
did  not  smoke  was  a  given.  The  reality  was 
almost  certainly  that  Northeastern  women  were 
smoking  in  private.     Tensions  began  to  grow 


during  the  first  decade  of  this  century,  when 
women  began  to  experiment  with  the 
boundaries  of  propriety,  something  that  their 
British  sisters  had  done  more  than  a  decade 
earlier.  In  1906,  an  anonymous  non-smoking 
woman  observed  in  the  pages  of  the  New  York 
Times  that  "in  this  country  it  is  still  considered 
not  quite  'the  thing'  for  a  woman  to  take  a 
cigarette  so  she  hides  the  habit,  or  attempts  to 
hide  it,"  while  "in  England  it  has  long  ceased  to 
be  a  matter  for  comment  when  a  woman 
smoked  either  privately  or  publicly" 
(Anonymous  1906).  She  further  mentioned  that 
she  had  never  seen  a  woman  smoke  until  she 
visited  London  in  the  mid-1890s,  on  which 
occasion  a  man  offered  her  a  cigarette  at  a  social 
function,  while  half  a  dozen  women  smoked 
nearby — the  experience  led  her  to  question 
whether  she  had  "got  into  a  crowd  that  was  not 
exactly  'nice,'"  and  that  it  took  her  about  two 
years  to  get  accustomed  to  seeing  women  smoke 
(ibid.).  The  experience  was  an  even  greater 
shock  to  an  American  man  who  witnessed 
women  smoking  in  a  London  restaurant — he 
stormed  out,  apologizing  for  choosing  a 
disreputable  establishment,  making  it  clear  that 
he  felt  it  very  forward  of  the  women  to  be 
smoking  in  such  a  place  (ibid.). 

It  is  clear  that  during  the  second  half  of  the 
19th  century,  radical  changes  occurred  in  the 
leisure  behavior  of  the  middle  and  upper  classes 
as  well  as  in  gender  relationships.  It  would 
appear  that  in  the  urban  Northeast,  the  act  of 
smoking  had  ideally  become  exclusively  male, 
practiced  alone  or  in  the  presence  of  other  men, 
in  places  set  aside  for  the  purpose  and  off-limits 
to  women — clubs,  smoking  rooms,  and  smoking 
cars  on  trains.  Hegemonic  behavior  required 
female  abstention  from  tobacco,  especially  in 
public.  Smoking  was  associated  by  men  and 
women  alike  with  other  male  behaviors  that  were 
considered  coarse  and  offensive  to  women. 
Whatever  these  behaviors  may  have  been,  their 
association  with  smoking  was  so  deeply 
ingrained  as  to  bring  forth  a  deep  sense  of 
unease,  or  even  disgust.  This  is  a  case  where  the 
act  of  smoking  could  cause  conflict,  associated 
as  it  was  with  this  implicit  ulterior  meaning. 

Although  the  structure  of  this  behavioral 
complex  is  unclear,  some  outlines  may 
tentatively  be  sketched.  Tolstoy,  at  about  the 
same  time,  held  that 

there  is  a  certain  well-defined,  undeniable 
interdependence  between  smoking  and  the  need  to 
silence  one's  conscience,  and  that  smoking  does 
undoubtedly  produce  that  effect....  When  do  boys 
begin  to  smoke?  Almost  invariably  when  they  have 
lost  the  innocence  of  childhood....  Why  is  it  that 
among   the   female   sex   the   women   who  lead 


Tobacco  and  Working-Class  Culture    225 


blameless,  regular  lives  are  the  least  addicted  to 
smoking?  Why  do  courtesans  and  the  insane  all 
smoke  without  exception?  (Tolstoy  1891:  179) 

This  almost  pharmacological  approach  to 
virtue  is  misleading.  It  may  in  fact  be  a  polite 
circumlocution  to  avoid  detailing  the  symbolic 
meaning  of  women  smoking  in  the  presence  of 
men.  It  appears  that  public  smoking,  or  even 
displaying  visible  evidence  of  being  a  smoker, 
was  a  means  by  which  women  signalled  sexual 
availability  to  men.  In  Victorian  Britain,  where 
appearential  ordering  often  hinged  on  minute 
details  of  dress  or  appearance,  a  man  might 
interpret  a  "slight  discoloration  of  the  teeth"  as  a 
sign  of  sexuality  (Sennett  1978: 166).  A  1908  New 
York  Times  editorial  baldly  tried  to  link  the 
importation  of  cigarette  smoking  from  Europe  to 
"continental"  social  scandal,  which  they 
apparently  meant  infidelity.  The  offended 
American  man  in  the  London  restaurant  was 
amazed  at  the  respectable  appearance  of  the 
smokers  at  the  nearby  table — "no  make- 
up...rather  dowdy  in  dress" — as  though  he 
expected  something  else  entirely  (Anonymous 
1906). 

This  aspect  of  tobacco  symbolism  is 
understandably  not  discussed  in  the  writings  of 
those  women  who  advocated  tolerance  of  public 
smoking.  How  women  were  to  maintain  the  all- 
important  appearance  of  modesty,  while 
engaging  in  behavior  that  signalled  the  opposite, 
was  a  thorny  but  not  insoluble  problem.  The 
ruffled  dandy's  dinner  companion  was  careful  to 
point  out  that  while  in  England  an  unmarried 
woman  "in  good  society"  could  smoke  a 
cigarette  with  a  man,  she  was  usually 
chaperoned  while  she  did  so  (Anonymous  1906). 

The  extent  to  which  this  moral  construct 
applied  to  the  working  class  as  it  did  for  "good 
society"  is  not  clear.  Victorian  attitudes  toward 
sexuality  and  class  combine  to  make  any 
statements  about  smoking  behavior  among 
working-class  women  highly  suspect.  William 
Acton,  a  19th-century  writer  on  sexuality 
distinguished  between  "the  majority  of  women" 
and  "low  and  vulgar  women,"  intimating  that 
sexual  attitudes  varied  with  class  (quoted  in 
Marcus  1964:  32).  It  may  well  be  that  in  the  case 
of  smoking  behavior  the  bourgeoisie  was 
defining  an  ethic  in  opposition  to  and  perhaps  in 
response  to  what  they  perceived  to  be  the 
dominant  working  class  ethic  (cf.  Montgomery 
1980). 

Women's  agitation  for  the  right  to  smoke  in 
public  coincided  with  a  general  revolt  among 
bourgeois  women  against  what  many  perceived 
the  overly  restrictive  appearential  ordering  of 
the  Victorian  Era.    In  the  1890s,  women  began 


wearing  makeup,  silk  petticoats  and  marcelled 
hair,  while  drab  colors  and  some  physically 
restrictive  garments,  such  as  the  bustle,  went  out 
of  fashion  (Sennett  1978: 183-190).  It  is  likely  that 
cigarette  smoking  was  part  of  this  shift  in 
fashion,  which  was  distinct  from  suffragism, 
although  the  two  may  have  influenced  each 
other.  Change  was  slower  in  coming  to  America 
than  to  England,  but  by  1910  the  moral 
repugnance  of  seeing  women  smoke  in  the 
presence  of  men  had  begun  to  diminish  in  the 
Northeast,  leaving  only  discomfort  in  its  wake. 
In  December  of  that  year,  a  woman  accepted  a 
cigarette  from  a  man  in  the  dining  room  of  the 
newly-opened  Ritz-Carlton  Hotel  in  New  York, 
and  calmly  smoked  it.  She  attracted  the 
attention  of  the  patrons,  the  waiter,  the  head 
waiter  and  the  manager,  all  of  whom  were  either 
too  stunned,  or  more  likely  too  polite,  to  interfere 
(New  York  Times,  18  December  1910:  14).  This 
was  by  no  means  the  last  word  on  the  subject. 
Thirty  years  later,  Emily  Post  advised  that  "a 
[well-bred]  woman  does  not  yet  smoke  on  the 
street"  (Post  1940). 

The  evidence  points  to  a  contested  shift  in 
smoking  behavior  among  middle-class  women, 
which  took  place  in  Britain  in  the  1890s  and  in 
the  urbanized  eastern  United  States  during  the 
first  decade  of  this  century.  Although  women 
often  phrased  their  verbal  and  written 
justifications  for  smoking  in  public  in  terms  of 
their  being  granted  the  same  rights  as  women  in 
other  societies,  their  insistence,  coming  as  it  did 
at  a  time  when  suffragists  were  agitating  for  the 
right  to  vote,  was  interpreted  as  a  desire  for 
equal  rights  with  men  in  their  own  society. 
Through  the  symbolic  behavior  of  public 
smoking,  middle-class  women  were  visibly 
resisting  the  limitations  of  Victorian  conceptions 
of  the  women's  sphere,  which  was  often 
expressed  in  strongly  moral  terms,  but  they  were 
doing  so  in  a  way  that  could  be  made  to  appear 
politically  innocent  if  necessary.  The  horrified 
reactions  that  their  symbolic  resistance 
provoked  has  led  many,  (most  notably  the 
makers  of  Virginia  Slims)  to  equate  it  with 
Suffragism,  which  was  not  necessarily  the  case. 
All  in  all,  the  most  intriguing  aspect  of  this 
resistance  is  that  rural  and  working-class  women 
may  have  been  engaging  in  it  long  before  their 
more  privileged  sisters. 


The  Archaeology  of  Smoking  Behavior:  The 
Boott  Mills  Data 

We  have  seen  from  a  variety  of  literary  and 
historical  sources  that  such  mundane  and 
insignificant  objects  as  common  clay  tobacco 


226   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


pipes  played  significant  roles  in  the  construction 
of  class  consciousness  and  often  were 
instrumental  in  its  articulation.  While 
articulation  of  class  differences  is  most  visible  to 
us  in  situations  of  conflict,  it  is  clear  that  smoking 
was  an  integral  part  of  day-to-day  relaxation 
among  working  people  as  well  as  among 
members  of  the  upper  classes. 

With  such  a  wealth  of  documentary 
information  available  it  is  surprising  that 
historical  archaeologists  and  students  of 
material  culture  have  largely  neglected  the 
behavioral  context  of  tobacco  use.  They  have 
concentrated  instead  on  descriptive  studies  and 
on  investigating  technological  attributes  of  clay 
pipes  that  relate  most  closely  to  chronology. 

Clay  pipes  are  among  the  most  commonly 
described  artifacts  in  the  archaeological 
literature.  One  reason  for  this  is  their  ubiquity  on 
archaeological  sites  in  the  United  Kingdom, 
much  of  Europe,  English  and  French  North 
America,  and  Australia,  on  sites  up  to  the  20th 
century,  and  their  presence  on  late  prehistoric 
and  historic  period  sites  in  Africa  and  Latin 
America.  A  second  reason  is  that  because  of  the 
great  variability  in  decoration  and  marking  on 
pipes,  and  the  usefulness  of  those  marks  as 
dating  tools,  a  number  of  archaeologists  have 
specialized  in  their  study.  Pipe  fragments  are 
often  examined  and  published  separately  from 
the  other  site  materials,  generating  an  immense 
bibliography,  most  of  which  is  descriptive  in 
character.  In  addition  there  are  several  journals 
devoted  to  the  subject,  and  a  long-running  series 
on  clay  pipes  is  published  by  British 
Archaeological  Reports. 

The  principal  use  to  which  clay  tobacco  pipes 
have  been  put  is  in  dating  archaeological  sites 
and  features.  In  addition  to  the  marks  of  known 
makers,  pipes  have  been  dated  by  a  variety  of 
methods,  most  frequently  through  comparing 
bowl  shapes  with  comparative  material  of  known 
date,  and  through  examination  of  the 
distribution  of  the  values  of  the  diameter  of  the 
stem  bores,  which  are  known  to  have  grown 
smaller  at  a  more  or  less  steady  rate  during  the 
17th  and  18th  centuries.  The  most  frequent 
application  of  the  latter  method  is  the  "Binford 
formula,"  a  statistical  treatment  that  requires  a 
large  sample  of  pipestem  fragments,  and  which 
breaks  down  and  produces  distorted  results 
when  applied  to  contexts  later  than  ca.  1780.3 

This  has  led  to  a  gap  in  the  study  of  clay  pipes. 
Samples  from  19th  and  20th-century  sites  are 


°Fot  extensive  discussions  of  dating  methods,  see  Noel 
Hume  1963;  Walker  1965, 1967;  and  Pfeiffer  1978. 


rarely  discussed  unless  they  contain  specimens 
with  dated  marks  or  complete  bowls.  Even  then 
there  is  a  problem  with  American  sites.  The 
most  prolific  exporters  of  pipes  to  the  New 
World  during  the  19th  century  tended  to  be  the 
most  successful  and  to  be  in  business  the 
longest — hence,  their  marks  are  the  least  useful 
for  dating  purposes.  In  addition,  very  little  19th- 
century  material  from  urban  contexts  on  the 
Eastern  seaboard  has  been  published — 
attention  has  gone  instead  to  earlier  materials 
that  are  more  easily  dated. 

The  Boott  Mills  tobacco  pipe  collection 
includes  488  white  clay  pipe  fragments.  Of 
these,  110  were  recovered  during  preliminary 
testing  (Beaudry  and  Mrozowski  1987a),  and  378 
during  the  excavation  of  operations  A  and  B. 
Two  terra  cotta  pipe  bowl  fragments  and  a  terra 
cotta  mouthpiece  round  out  the  clay  pipe 
component  of  the  collection.  Two  plastic 
pipestems  and  what  appears  to  be  a  bone 
mouthpiece  were  also  recovered.  Other  tobacco 
related  artifacts  included  two  fragments  of  a 
redware  cuspidor  with  molded  relief  decoration 
and  a  fragment  of  a  blue  cellulose  pocket 
calendar  issued  by  a  local  tobacconist  in  the 
mid-1 890s.  All  of  the  tobacco-related  material  is 
analyzed  in  detail  in  Chapter  10  of  this  volume, 
and  I  refer  the  reader  there  for  details  on  the 
collection. 


Dating 

Most  of  the  datable  clay  pipe  fragments  in  the 
collection  were  deposited  after  1890.  Although 
the  Binford  pipe  stem  formula  produced  a  date 
of  1761  based  on  bore  diameters,  this  date  is 
more  than  60  years  before  the  city  of  Lowell  was 
established.  The  shift  to  the  use  of  the  country  of 
origin  in  makers'  marks,  which  was  required  by 
the  McKinley  Tariff  Act  of  1891,  provides  much 
more  secure  dates.  Of  the  legible  Scottish  pipes 
in  the  boardinghouse  collection  nearly  80%  are 
marked  "Scotland."  The  immediate  implication 
of  this  is  that  much  of  the  material  in  the 
collection  was  manufactured — and  hence  used 
and  discarded — after  1891.  By  that  time  clay 
pipes  were  a  badge  of  the  working  classes. 

This  dating  criterion  permitted  the 
assignment  of  post-1891  dates  to  eight  features. 
Most  of  these  were  in  Operation  A,  probably  in 
large  part  because  more  of  the  features  in  that 
operation  were  excavated  than  in  Operation  B. 
In  addition,  there  was  a  difference  in  the 
distribution  of  datcable  material  recovered  from 
levels,  as  opposed  to  features,  between  the  two 
operations.  Earlier,  pre-1891  marked  Scottish 
material  is  concentrated  in  level  1  of  Operation 


Tobacco  and  Working-Class  Culture    227 


B,  while  the  post-1891  material  is  distributed 
across  the  site,  in  level  1,  there  is  a  fair  amount  in 
all  levels.  Possible  explanations  for  this 
difference  may  lie  in  both  the  number  of  people 
using  the  two  backlots,  and  differences  in  refuse 
disposal  philosophies  or  company  policy 
between  the  tenements  (Operation  A)  and  the 
board inghouses  (Operation  B). 


Consumer   Choices 

Some  of  the  pipes  carry  evidence  of  the 
ethnicity  of  their  owners.  Several  examples  are 
impressed  with  "DHUDEEN,"  the  Irish  word  for 
a  short-stemmed  clay  pipe.  Several  others  bear 
patriotic  slogans,  such  as  "HOME  RULE."  One 
example,  which  apparently  bore  the  likeness  of 
the  Irish  nationalist  martyr,  Wolf  Tone,  is  about 
as  clear  an  expression  of  conscious  ethnic 
identity  as  one  could  hope  to  find.  While 
Lowell's  Irish  expressed  their  ethnic  identity 
through  parades  and  other  such  rituals  (e.g., 
Marston  1987),  some  chose  to  do  so  in  more 
commonplace  ways  as  well. 

The  most  popular  type  of  pipe  was  one  with 
the  initials  "T.D."  marked  on  the  back  of  the 
bowl,  facing  the  smoker.  Seventeen  of  these 
pipe  bowls  in  complete  or  nearly  complete 
condition,  and  fragments  of  at  least  16  more,  are 
present  in  the  collection.  "T.D.s,"  as  they  were 
called,  were  so  popular  that  their  name  came  to 
be  synonymous  with  clay  pipes,  particularly 
those  from  Scotland  (Cooper  1908;  Walker  1983: 
38,  39).  T.D.s  sold  at  retail  for  only  a  few  cents  in 
Boston  during  the  1880s  (Ibid.),  and  analysis  of 
price  lists  suggests  that  Scottish  T.D.s  were  as  a 
group  significantly  less  costly  than  other  Scottish 
export  pipes  (Cook  1988). 


Modifications 

Perhaps  the  most  intriguing  aspect  of  the 
boardinghouse  pipe  material  concerns 
modification  of  the  pipes  by  their  users.  It 
appears  that  in  some  cases  smokers  were 
breaking  off  the  factory-made  mouthpieces,  and 
presumably  portions  of  the  stems,  before 
smoking  from  the  pipes.  Of  32  clearly 
identifiable  factory-made  mouthpiece 
fragments,  only  six  show  any  evidence  of  tooth- 
wear  associated  with  use.  By  contrast,  14  broken 
stem  fragments  show  evidence  either  of  tooth- 
wear — extreme  wear  in  some  cases — or  of 
intentional  modification  such  as  whittling  or 
grinding  the  stem  to  convenient  dimensions  for 
gripping  between  the  teeth.  One  stem  fragment 
had  been  carefully  scored  with  a  knife  and 
snapped  off  at  the  score.  The  implication  is  that 


some  of  the  pipes  were  modified  by  shortening 
their  stems  prior  to  use.  This  indicates  that  the 
use  of  short-stemmed  clay  pipes  by  working 
people  was  not  solely  a  function  of  economics, 
but  rather  partook  of  aesthetics  as  well.  They 
smoked  short  pipes  because  they  liked  to  smoke 
short  pipes,  and  if  the  pipes  that  were  available 
were  not  short  enough,  they  could  easily  be 
made  suitable. 

Indications  are  that  the  boardinghouse 
residents  preferred  pipes  that  were  short  indeed. 
In  the  few  cases  where  it  is  possible  to  measure 
or  reconstruct  the  length  of  modified  stems,  we 
find  them  to  be  between  two  and  four  inches  in 
length. 


Discussion 

In  short,  the  point  at  which  pipes  cease  to  be 
easily  dated  falls  in  the  late  18th  century,  and 
coincides  roughly  with  the  generally  accepted 
date  at  which  they  might  become  useful  as 
indicators  of  class.  The  latter  use  has  apparently 
never  been  explored,  or  even  considered  by 
archaeologists.  More  than  half  of  the  Scottish 
pipestem  fragments  from  the  Boott  Mills 
Boardinghouse  collection  are  marked  with  the 
country,  rather  than  the  city,  of  origin  indicating 
that  much  of  the  material  dates  after  1890.  By 
that  date,  the  very  presence  of  clay  pipes  is  an 
indicator  of  working-class  occupation,  if 
interpreted  on  the  basis  of  the  historical  data 
cited  above.  In  addition,  examination  of  tooth- 
wear  patterns  and  intentional  modifications  on 
the  stem  and  mouthpiece  fragments  in  the 
collection  suggests  that  the  users  were  breaking 
the  mouthpieces  and  part  of  the  stem  off  without 
using  them,  until  they  reached  a  stem  length 
with  which  they  felt  comfortable.  Several 
examples  indicate  that  they  were  used  with  stem 
lengths  of  three  to  five  inches.  These  lengths  are 
consistent  with  documented  working  class 
preferences. 

Ethnicity  has  been  a  major  concern  of 
historical  archaeologists  (e.g.,  Schuyler  1980),  but 
the  literature  indicates  that  much  of  this  concern 
has  been  at  the  grossest  level  possible,  i.e., 
consideration  primarily  of  groups  from  separate 
continents  (usually,  Asians  and  Africans). 
Meanwhile,  students  of  history  and  material 
culture  have  been  telling  us  that  English 
regional  ethnic  cultures  are  visible  in  the 
documentary  and  material  records  (Allen  1981; 
St.  George  1979:  13-14),  as  are  regional  cultures 
within  our  own  country  (Glassie  1968).  During 
the  19th  century,  it  is  clear  that  regional  variation 
occurred    in    tobacco   use,    and    scholars   are 


228    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


beginning  to  approach  ethnic  differentiation  in 
pipe  material  (e.g.,  Alexander  1986). 

Issues  of  social  class  and  "socioeconomic 
status"  have  recently  become  prominent  in 
historical  archaeology  (e.g.,  Spencer-Wood  1987; 
Paynter  1988;  McGuire  1988).  Various  elements 
of  the  archaeological  record  have  been 
examined  for  their  value  as  indicators  of  status 
or  their  sensitivity  to  class  analysis,  including 
refined  ceramics,  gravestones,  fish  remains, 
vertebrate  faunal  remains,  and  location  of  sites 
within  the  cultural  and  natural  landscapes.  Clay 
tobacco  pipe  fragments  have  not  been  seen  as 
useful  in  the  identification  of  social  status  in  the 
archaeological  record.  I  suspect  this  is  at  least 
partly  because  the  usual  procedure  is  to 
determine  which  elements  of  material  life  are 
indicators  of  higher  status  occupation,  and  to 
consider  their  absence,  or  inverse  value  as 
indicative  of  lower  status  occupation.  That  is  not 
necessarily  wrong  in  methodological  terms,  but 
the  potential  value  of  clay  pipe  fragments 
indicates  that  the  procedure  may  work  equally 
well  in  reverse.  In  terms  of  clay  pipe  use,  the 
presence  of  pipes  with  extremely  long  stems 
would  indicate  the  presence  of  upper  class 
smokers.  A  problem  with  recovering  such  stems 
is  that,  unless  you  have  all  of  the  fragments,  you 
have  no  way  of  knowing  how  long  the  stem  was — 
if  a  fragment  in  the  middle  is  missing,  there  will 
be  no  way  to  match  the  two  pieces  of  stem  to  one 
another.  On  the  other  hand,  when  a  pipe  with  a 
much  shorter  stem  is  discarded,  it  is  more  likely 
to  be  recoverable.  This  proved  to  be  the  case 
with  the  pipe  collection  from  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse — in  several  cases,  single 
fragments  of  several  inches  in  length  were 
noted,  with  part  of  the  pipe  bowl  at  one  end  and 
heavy  tooth-wear  at  the  other,  indicating  use  of 
short-stemmed  pipes. 

There  was  also  evidence  of  modification  of  the 
pipes  before  smoking.  The  pattern  of  tooth  wear 
indicated  that  pipes  were  less  likely  to  see  heavy 
use  until  they  had  been  modified  by  breaking  off 
the  factory-made  mouthpiece.  There  is  no 
question  that  the  boardinghouse  residents- 
workers  in  the  Lowell  textile  mills — preferred 
short-stemmed  pipes  and  modified  the  ones 
that  they  purchased  until  they  were  satisfied  with 
them. 

Ethnically-based  smoking  behavior  is  also 
visible  in  the  tobacco  pipe  material  from  The 
Boott  Mills  boardinghouse.  Irish  presence  is 
indicated  by  the  remains  of  a  pipe  bearing  the 
name  of  Wolf  Tone,  an  Irish  patriot  executed  by 
the  British  in  1798.  Several  other  pipes  marked 
"Home  Rule"  (and  which  may  in  fact  have  been 
made  in  Canada  or  the  United  States)  testify  to 


the  strength  of  Irish  political  feeling,  despite 
having  emigrated.  At  least  one  other  pipe  is 
marked  "Dhudeen,"  which  is  the  Irish  term  for  a 
short  pipe. 

Thus  far  the  only  pipes  displaying  "legible" 
evidence  of  ethnicity  at  the  boarding  house  are 
Irish  (cf.  Fussell  1983:  54-55  for  "legible 
clothing").  There  are  pipe  fragments  with  as  yet 
unidentified  designs  and  legends,  but  we  cannot 
be  certain  that  these  are  ethnic.  There  may  be 
evidence  in  the  collection  that  reflects  the 
presence  of  other  ethnic  groups  in  the 
boardinghouses,  but  without  the  same  kind  of 
clear  evidence  that  we  have  for  the  Irish,  the 
ethnic  identifications  must  remain  tenuous,  at 
least  for  now.  For  example,  several  plastic 
(imitation  tortoise-shell)  mouthpieces  were 
recovered.  Both  appear  to  be  of  what  is  known 
as  the  "half  bent"  shape,  a  type  consistent  with 
the  composite  pipes  favored  by  immigrants  from 
Eastern  Europe.  Both  stems  were  made  to  be 
inserted  into  pipe  bowls  of  another  material 
(which  may  even  have  been  brier).  Both  were 
very  likely  inexpensive,  and  both  were  used  until 
they  were  broken  or  worn  through. 

In  contrast  to  the  class  and  ethnic  information 
that  is  present  in  the  boardinghouse  pipe 
material,  there  is  as  yet  no  evidence  suggestive 
of  women's  smoking  behavior.  This  is  almost 
certainly  because  we  have  yet  to  determine  that 
smoking  occurred  among  woman  textile  workers 
in  Lowell,  to  identify  what  the  material 
components  of  any  such  behavior  might  be,  or  in 
what  way  they  might  be  gender-specific.  These 
lacunae  may  best  be  addressed  through 
intensive  research  in  Lowell  newspapers  and 
oral  history  directed  towards  recovering 
information  on  tobacco  use. 

In  sum,  archaeologists  and  students  of 
material  culture  have  tended  to  neglect  the 
behavioral  aspects  of  tobacco  use  and  their 
effect  on  the  material  record,  and  have 
concentrated  instead  on  the  chronological  uses 
of  the  material  itself.  This  chronological  focus 
has  diverted  attention  from  the  period  after  ca. 
1780,  when  material  is  less  easily  dated. 
Unfortunately,  this  is  also  the  period  when  in 
tobacco  use,  the  mediation  of  social  class, 
ethnicity,  and  gender  through  manipulation  of 
material  culture  is  most  clearly  visible. 
Information  drawn  from  examination  of  clay 
pipes  translates  back  into  behaviors  that  may 
inform  us  about  the  class  and  ethnic  context  in 
which  the  pipes  were  deposited.  It  may  prove 
possible  as  well,  given  a  reorientation  of  research 


Tobacco  and  Working-Class  Culture    229 


goals  on  the  part  of  clay  tobacco  pipe  scholars,  to 
gain  such  information  for  earlier  periods.4 


Summary 

Smoking  behavior  has  been  used  as  a  means 
of  constructing  and  communicating  class, 
ethnicity,  and  gender  relationships  through 
manipulation  of  material  culture.  Material 
objects,  specifically  white  clay  pipes,  have  been 
used  to  express  social  and  cultural  statements — 
among  those  statements,  the  distinctiveness  of 
the  working  classes,  who  modified  their  pipes  to 
make  them  as  different  as  they  could  from 
upper  class  models  for  practical  reasons. 

Use  of  smoking  pipes  as  a  communicative 
element  in  class  relations  has  involved  making 
them  more  visible  in  episodes  of  class  conflict, 
although  they  were  apparently  not  themselves  a 
source  of  conflict.  Similarly,  ethnic  differences 
could  be  symbolized  by  tobacco-related 
behavior.  Gender  appears  to  be  the  only  area 
where  smoking  itself  could  generate  conflict. 
This  was  because  gender  relations  were  bound 
up  in  an  ethic  that  linked  smoking  with  sexuality, 
and  perceived  tobacco  use  as  a  threat  to 
women's  moral  standing. 

Overall,  smoking  had  moral  connotations,  but 
these  were  primarily  situational  and  reflected 
prevailing  middle  class  attitudes  concerning 
appropriate  leisure  behavior.  Violation  of  those 
attitudes,  rather  than  smoking  itself,  was  the 
objectionable  element  of  behavior  in  situations 
of  conflict. 

In  approaching  mundane  working  class 
behavior  such  as  smoking,  archaeology  provides 
certain  advantages.  Through  control  of  spatial 
context,  we  may  be  certain  that  we  are 
examining  the  end  products  of  a  working  class 
behavior,  and  a  behavior  at  that  that  is  subject  to 
substantial  bias  in  the  documentary  record.  The 
social  context  of  boardinghouse  life  as  we  have 
delineated  it  in  this  report  disambiguates  the 
relationships  between  certain  people  and 
certain  objects,  bringing  the  social  behavior  that 
linked  them  into  focus,  in  the  case  of  a  limited 
number  of  artifacts.  Clay  pipes  are  by  no  means 
the  only  artifacts  that  signal  subcultural 
differences,  or  find  use  in  the  construction  of 
selves,  social  classes,  or  cultures.  Bond's  work 
with  alcoholic  beverage  containers  and  the 
drinking  behavior  that  lay  hidden  behind  a 


facade  of  company  respectability,  and  Ziesing's 
study  of  apparel  and  the  world  of  public  display 
(both  elsewhere  in  this  volume),  indicate  that 
those  artifacts  operated  as  public  symbols,  as 
well  as  fulfilling  more  mundane  functions. 

The  approach  used  here  has  been  a 
contextual  one.  The  combination  of  information 
on  the  social,  cultural  and  ethnographic  contexts 
of  tobacco  use  drawn  from  the  documentary 
record,  with  a  considerable  body  of  theory  on 
leisure,  material  culture  and  symbols  makes  it 
possible  to  generate  a  framework  of 
interpretation  that  returns  pipes  to  their  active, 
systemic,  cultural  context,  giving  them  a  more 
provocative  role  than  that  allowed  them  when 
they  are  approached  as  mere  markers  of  time  in 
the  archaeological  context.  The  use  of  a  model 
of  intergroup  relations  based  on  cultural 
hegemony,  rather  than  the  Dominant  Ideology 
Thesis,  has  permitted  a  fuller  interpretation  of 
the  complex  processes  of  culture  change,  in 
which  those  without  money  or  influence  have 
occasionally  commanded  the  power  to  create  at 
least  part  of  their  world. 

"Snow  white  little  instruments  of  comfort"  had 
great  power  to  influence  human  thought  and 
action,  power  that  was  out  of  proportion  to  their 
ubiquitous  status  as  common  artifacts  involved 
in  day-to-day  activities.  Their  material  remains 
provide  the  essential  key  to  the  meanings  that 
linked  people  with  things  and  imbued  them  both 
with  that  power. 


Peter  Pope's  innovative  discussion  of  tobacco  use  and  its 
material  remains  in  17th-century  Ferryland, 
Newfoundland  (Pope  1988),  is  a  fine  example  of  such 
research. 


230    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Chapter  12 

CONTEXTUAL  ARCHEOLOGY  AT  THE  BOOTT  MILLS 
BOARDINGHOUSE  BACKLOTS 

by  G.  K.  Kelso,  William  F.  Fisher,  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski,  and  Karl  J. 

Reinhard 


Most  of  the  deposits  investigated  in  the 
original  boardinghouse  backlot  excavations  had 
been  subjected  to  post-habitation  disturbance. 
Macrofossil  and  pollen  analysis  were  limited  by 
the  number  of  interpretable  samples  available, 
and  phytolith  analysis  was  not  attempted.  Some 
macrofossil  dietary  and  groundcover 
information  was  recovered,  but  the 
interpretation  of  the  majority  of  the  pollen  data 
had  to  be  focused  on  defining  the  nature  and 
extent  of  this  post-depositional  manipulation  of 
the  data  context  rather  than  reconstruction  of 
the  millworker's  leisure-time  environment 
(Mrozowski  and  Kelso  1987: 150-151). 

The  original  analysis  did  suggest  that  changes 
had  occurred  in  the  backlot  groundcover  which 


might  have  resulted  from  documented  changes 
in  the  philosophy  and  practice  of  boardinghouse 
management  in  19th-  and  early  20th-century 
Lowell  (Bell  1987a:  67;  Bond  1987:  53;  Mrozowski 
and  Kelso  1987:  147).  This  should  be  clearly 
recorded  in  undisturbed  archeological  deposits, 
and  it  is  reasonable  to  assume  that  evidence  of 
parallel  changes  in  diet  and  health  might  also  be 
recovered.  The  following  soil  chemistry, 
macrofossil,  phytolith,  parasite,  and  pollen 
investigations  of  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse 
backlots  constitute  a  cross-disciplinary  scientific 
search  for  physical  indicators  of  such  socially- 
driven  changes  in  life  style  and  landscape. 


Palynology,  Land  Use,  and  Site  Formation  Processes  in  Urban  Archeology: 
The  Boott  Mills  Boardinghouse  Backlots,  Lowell,  Massachusetts 

by  G.  K.  Kelso  and  William  F.  Fisher 


Introduction 

No  stratigraphic  sequence  incorporating  the 
complete  occupation  period  at  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouses  was  recovered  during  the  initial 
1985  excavations  in  the  backlots  of  the  structures 
fronting  on  John  Street  (Beaudry  1987a:  90). 
Pollen  analysis  was  confined  to  a  profile  of  the  33 
John  Street  cellar  fill  and  a  profile  from  a 
postulated  clothesline  post  hole  containing  ca. 
1890  artifacts.  The  pollen  type  sequence  within 
the  cellar  fill  shifted  from  grass  dominance  in 
the  deeper  samples  to  wind-pollinated 
Compositae  (ragweed  relatives)  dominance  in 
the  upper  portion  of  the  fill.  Pollen  concentration 
values  were  highest  at  the  bottom,  implying  that 
the  cellar  fill  sequence  was  reversed 
stratigraphy.  The  backlot  had  apparently  been 
stripped  to  fill  the  cellar  hole.  The  upper,  grass- 
dominated  backlot  deposits  ended  up  in  the 
bottom  of  the  cellar  hole  where  their  relatively 
high  pollen  concentrations  were  protected  by 
the  overburden,  and  the  older,  less  polliferous 
deposits  originally  at  the  bottom  of  the  backlot 


profile  ended  up  on  top  of  the  sequence  in  and 
over  the  cellar  hole  (Kelso  1987a:  145). 

The  postulated  post  hole  appeared  to  have 
been  re-opened  at  one  time,  presumably  to 
remove  the  post.  The  hole  was  then  allowed  to 
fill  naturally,  producing  a  sequence  in  which  the 
homogenized  pollen  spectra  of  the  original 
deeper  fill  is  replaced  by  relatively  high  grass 
frequencies  that  decline  toward  the  top  of  the 
profile  as  the  wind-pollinated  Compositae 
counts  increase  (Kelso  1987a:  146).  The  sum  of 
these  two  profiles  is  a  cultural/vegetational 
history  sequence  in  which  early  dominant 
ragweeds  in  the  33  John  Street  backlot  are 
replaced  by  grass  during  the  major  portion  of 
the  occupation.  Ragweed  populations 
apparently  recovered  as  grass  declined  post- 
1890  (Kelso  1987a:  145-146).  The  late  19th- 
century  ragweed  episode  roughly  coincided  with 
a  demographic  shift  toward  replacement  of 
natives  by  immigrants  in  the  mill  work  force  and 
a  functional/proprietary  change  in  many 
structures      from      corporation      owned 


231 


232    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


boardinghouses  to  slumlord-managed 
tenements  and  lodging  houses.  Structure 
maintenance  declined  (Bond  1987:  40-41;  Bell 
1987a:  67),  and  the  pollen  data  suggest  slippage 
in  landscape  standards  as  well. 

Reverse  stratigraphy  and  post  holes  are  not 
data  sources  in  which  one  may  place  absolute 
confidence.  The  perceived  landscape- 
ownership-occupancy  connection  in  the  pollen 
spectra  of  the  John  Street  boardinghouses 
constitutes  a  hypothesis  rather  than  a 
conclusion.  A  primary  objective  of  the  pollen 
analysis  portion  of  the  1986  excavations  was  to 
test  this  hypothesis  in  the  adjoining  backlots  of 
the  similarity  fated  45-48  James  (later  Sirk) 
Street  boardinghouses. 


Documentary        and         Archeological 
Background 

The  poorly-drained  terrace  above  the 
Merrimack  upon  which  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouses  were  constructed  first  appears 
in  the  historical  record  as  part  of  a  ca.  1821 
farmstead  owned  by  an  individual  named 
Nathan  Tyler  (Beaudry  1987a:  73).  Kirk  Boott 
subsequently  established  his  home  on  the  plot. 
The  1825  "Plan  of  the  Land  and  Buildings 
Belonging  to  the  Merrimack  Manufacturing 
Company"  (Figure  12-1)  places  the  impressive 
Boott  mansion  (Beaudry  1987a:  figs.  7-1,7-2) 
very  close  to  the  plot  examined  in  this  report, 
and  the  1837  inventory  of  Boott's  estate  provides 
evidence  for  formal  lawns  in  the  form  of  a  stone 
lawn  roller.  What  appears  to  be  an  extensive 
garden  arranged  in  distinct  geometric  plots  is 
depicted  on  the  1825  map,  and  the  1837 
inventory  indicates  the  existence  of  a  separate 
"seed  room."  This  may  have  been  a  greenhouse 
or  potting  shed.  The  inventory  also  records  the 
presence  of  livestock  and  provides  evidence  in 
the  form  of  harrows,  scythes,  rakes  and 
pitchforks  for  haymaking  on  the  estate  (Beaudry 
1987a:  75). 

Boott's  mansion  was  relocated  after  his  early 
1837  death  to  make  way  for  the  ongoing  (1835- 
1839)  erection  of  the  Boott  Mills  boardinghouses. 
These  had  variable  histories,  some  undergoing 
multiple  changes  in  function  and  ownership  over 
the  next  100  years  (Clancey  1987).  The  No.  45-^8 
James  (later  Sirk)  Street  boardinghouses  were 
owned  by  the  Boott  Mills  Corporation 
throughout  their  existence.  Half  the  ells  in  the 
backlot  were  removed  between  1892  and  1906, 
and  the  rest  were  gone  by  1924.  The  block  was 
operated  as  boardinghouses,  tenements,  and 
lodging  houses  until  the  company  converted 
them  to  storage  in  1918  (Bond  1987:  41;  Clancey 


1987:  32).  These  particular  boardinghouses  were 
torn  down  in  April,  1934  (Clancey  1987:  32). 

The  demographic  histories  of  the  various 
Boott  Mills  boardinghouses  were  also  variable. 
The  original  1830s-1840s  inhabitants  of  the 
central,  boardinghouse  section  of  each  unit  were 
largely  native-born  single  women.  The  male 
supervisors  and  their  families  were  separately 
housed  in  tenement  units  at  the  end  of  each 
block.  The  numbers  of  both  families  and 
unattached  males  increased  in  the  1850s  though 
the  1860s,  although  the  families  in  the 
tenements  were  largely  native  born,  and  the 
women  in  the  work  force  greatly  outnumbered 
the  men.  The  numbers  of  foreign  workers  were 
rising  rapidly  during  this  era,  but  the  regulation 
that  mill  workers  live  "on  corporation"  had  been 
dropped.  The  immigrants  were  just  not  living  in 
the  boardinghouses  (Bond  1987:  50).  After  1880 
this  changed;  by  1900,  males  equaled  females  in 
number,  and  immigrants  among  the  boarders 
exceeded  the  native  born  (Bond  1987:  50-53). 

Documents  and  archeology  suggest  that  living 
conditions  changed  parallel  to  demographic 
shifts.  The  policy  of  "corporate  paternalism"  was 
never  rescinded,  but  enforcement  was 
apparently  relaxed  to  some  extent  during  the 
immigrant  worker  era,  and  the  documentary 
record  implies  considerable  casual  waste 
disposal  in  boardinghouse  precincts  (Bond  1989: 
2-3).  Archeology  supports  this  interpretation. 
The  major  portion  of  the  debris  recovered  from 
the  backlot  dates  to  the  late,  post-1890,  portion 
of  the  occupation  (Dutton,  this  volume)  and  that 
portion  which  can  be  attributed  to  a  specific 
social  group  was  apparently  deposited  by 
foreign-born  males  (Cook,  this  volume). 


Methods 

Level  3  in  45-48  James  (Sirk)  Street  backlot  lay 
just  under  the  recent  parking  lot  blacktop.  It  was 
capped  with  a  thin,  relatively  continuous  layer  of 
broken  window  glass  from  the  dismantling  of  the 
boardinghouses,  and  the  occupation-period 
deposits  appeared  to  be  largely  intact.  The 
cultural  deposits  (levels  2  and  3)  were  rather 
shallow,  but  it  was  possible  to  collect  profiles  of 
useful  length  at  several  locations. 

The  following  four  profiles  and  a  single  sample 
of  special  matrix  were  selected  for  analysis: 
21N8W,  northwest  profile  (Figures  12-2,  12- 
8,12-9);  21N8W,  northeast  profile  (Figures  12-2, 
12-10,  12-12);  Feature  61  profile  (Figures  12-2, 
12-14,  12-15);  Feature  27  profile  (Figures  12-3, 
12-13);  and  Feature  65,  apparent  potting  soil  lens 
(Figures  12-2,  12-13).  The  locations  of  these  are 
indicated  on  the  site  plan  of  Operation  B  (Figure 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    233 


illll 


i^bsss 


Figure  12-1.  The  layout  of  Kirk  Boott's  estate  as  shown  on  "A  Plan  of  the  Land  and 
Buildings  belonging  to  the  Merrimack  Manufacturing  Company..."  made  in  1825  by 
Geo.  R.  Baldwin.  Excavation  unit  21N/8W  indicated  by  shading.  (Courtesy  Lowell 
National  Historical  Park.) 


234   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


*>  4 


O 


Q^ 


<^ 


a  «... 

S«>i  Sl  on 


•  •II  BM8H     Opvral.on  B 


□ 


0 


o 


0 


OHO  ,,t« 


Figure  12-2.  Operation  B.,  unit  21N8W.  Features  61  and  65  indicated  by  hatching. 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    235 


*  *M 


omnn^^s7  ^  ^  ^ 


IS! 

'I     Sinn* 


Soil  S'ain 
I  ON  OW    un.t   Number  INE  Corner) 


<9c/*£=. 


OWOll   8MBM      Operation 


Figure  12-3.  Operation  A.  Feature  27  indicated  by  hatching. 


236   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


12-2)  and  Operation  A  (Figure  12-3). 

The  pollen  was  extracted  in  the  palynology 
laboratory  of  the  Boston  University  Center  for 
Archaeological  Studies  and  followed 
Mehringer's  (1967)  procedure.  Residues  were 
mounted  in  glycerol  for  viewing,  and  analysis 
was  conducted  at  the  Eastern  Archeological 
Field  Laboratory,  National  Park  Service,  Boston, 
Massachusetts.  The  pollen  was  identified  at 
400x  with  problematical  grains  examined  under 
oil  immersion  at  lOOOx.  A  minimum  of  400 
pollen  grains  were  tabulated  for  all  samples.  All 
pine  pollen  grains  were  examined  for  the  "belly 
warts"  that  distinguish  white  pine  (Pinus  strobus) 
from  the  other  species  of  Pinus  growing  in  New 
England  (Kapp  1969:  38).  The  pine  data  did  not 
prove  significant  at  this  particular  site  and  were 
not  incorporated  in  the  diagrams.  The  open  line 
bars  in  the  pollen  diagrams  are  based  on  relative 
frequencies  (percentages)  computed  from 
separate  sums  for  arboreal  and  non-arboreal 
pollen  types.  This  separation  serves  to 
differentiate  the  normally  tree-dominated 
regional  pollen  contribution  from  the  local, 
largely  herbaceous,  pollen  types  to  some  extent 
(Janssen  1973:  33)  and  reduces  the  statistical 
distortions  that  the  contributions  of  pollen  types 
reflecting  different  phenomena  induce  in  each 
other.  It  has  the  disadvantage  of  producing 
possibly  misleadingly  high  percentages  in  some 
instances  from  small  counts  among  the  minor 
types.  Total  sum  diagrams  (relative  frequencies 
based  on  the  identifiable  pollen  of  all  types)  are 
sometimes  of  value,  in  conjunction  with  those 
based  on  separate  AP/NAP  sums,  in 
ascertaining  relationships  between  local  and 
regional  vegetation  change.  The  solid  colored 
portion  of  the  diagrams  records  this  measure. 

Historical  archeologists  most  frequently 
encounter  plants  under  English  names  in  their 
documentary  sources.  For  their  convenience  the 
common  New  England  names  for  plant  taxa  are 
employed  in  both  the  text  and  the  diagrams.  A 
conversion  table  (Table  12-1)  of  vernacular  and 
Latin  names  is  provided  for  those  who  wish  to 
follow  the  practice  of  the  paleoecological 
research  community. 

Pollen  concentrations  per  gram  of  sample 
were  computed,  following  Benninghoff's  (1962) 
exotic  pollen  addition  method  as  a  check  on 
relative  pollen  preservation,  but  pollen 
concentration  figures  were  not  computed  for 
individual  taxa.  These  would  not  be  meaningful 
in  the  absence  of  chronological  control  over 
sedimentation  rate  and  might  be  mistaken  for 
pollen  influx  data.  All  pollen  grains  too 
degraded  to  be  identified  were  tabulated  to 
provide  further  control  over  corrosion  factors. 


Unidentifiable  pollen  grains  were  taken  into 
account  in  calculating  pollen  concentrations. 
They  were  not  incorporated  in  any  sum  from 
which  the  frequencies  of  individual  types  were 
computed,  because  the  arboreal  or  non-arboreal 
origin  of  unidentifiable  pollen  grains  cannot  be 
computed.  The  data  for  unidentifiable  pollen,  as 
a  percentage  of  total  identifiable  and 
unidentifiable  pollen,  and  the  data  for  corroded 
oaks,  a  prominent  pollen  type  that  retains  its 
identity  while  readily  degrading  (van  Zeist  1967: 
49),  are  presented  in  the  diagrams.  The  terms 
"corroded"  and  "degraded"  are  used 
interchangeably  here  and  refer  to  any  kind  of 
pollen  deterioration  other  than  tearing.  They  are 
not  intended  as  references  to  the  specific  classes 
of  deterioration  defined  under  these  terms  by 
Cushing  (1964)  and  Havinga  (1984). 


Site  Formation  Processes 

Much  of  our  interpretation  of  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse  backlots  is  based  on  analysis  of 
site  formation  processes.  Two  aspects  of  the  site 
formation  process  that  affect  the  pollen  record 
can  be  palynologically  recognized.  One  is  the 
nature  of  matrix  origin:  normal  soil  profile 
development  versus  episodic  fill.  The  second  is 
natural  post-depositional  modification  of  the 
pollen  spectra.  Two  kinds  of  post-depositional 
changes  are  evident  in  the  pollen  record  itself: 
pollen  movement  and  pollen  destruction. 
Several  agencies  are  involved  in  each. 


Pollen   Movement 

In  a  lake  or  marsh  profile  a  palynologist  can 
assume,  with  certain  exceptions  (Webb  1973), 
that  older  pollen  occurs  in  deeper  samples 
because  the  deposition  of  the  matrix  and  the 
deposition  of  the  pollen  are  roughly 
contemporaneous  events.  This  does  not  hold 
true  in  terrestrial  profiles.  Pollen  in  soils  is 
moved  downward  by  percolating  groundwater. 
Progressively  older  pollen  is  found  toward  the 
bottom  of  normal  soil  profiles  because  pollen 
leaching  outpaces  stratigraphic  matrix 
accumulation  (Erdtman  1969:  147;  Dimbleby 
1985:  4-9).  At  the  same  time,  earthworms  move 
pollen  up  and  down  in  the  deposit  (Walch, 
Rowley,  and  Norton  1970:  42). 

Dimbleby's  (1985:  fig.  3)  schematic  diagram  of 
the  resulting  pollen  profile  presented  in  Figure 
12-4.  Most  of  the  older  pollen  has  been  leached 
to  the  bottom  of  the  profile,  but  some  has  been 
moved  back  up  by  earthworms.  The  youngest 
pollen  is  found  at  the  top  of  the  soil,  although  a 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    237 


Table  12-1.  Vernacular  and  Latin  names  of  plants. 

Pinus  -  pine 

Gramineae  -  grass 

Picea  -  spruce 

Avena  fatua  -  wild  oats 

Tsuga  -  hemlock 

Cerealia  -  European  cereal  grass 

Cupressaceae  -  cedar /juniper 

Quercus  -  oak 

Chenopodiaceae  -  goosefoot  family 

Fagus  -  beech 

Castanea  -  chestnut 

Compositae  -  ragweed  family 

Betula  -  birch 

Artemisia  -  wormwood 

Alnus  -  alder 

Ambrosia-type  =  wind-pollinated  Compositae 

Corylus  -  hazel 

Oystra  -  hornbeam 

Aster-type  =  insect-pollinated  Compositae 

Carpinus  -  blue  beech 

Acer  saccharinum  -silver  maple 

Liguliflorae  -  dandelion  type  Compositae 

Acer  saccharum  -  sugar  maple 

Acer  rubrum  -  red  maple 

Cardus  -  thistle 

Platnus  -  sycamore 

Cruciferae  -  mustard  family 

Juglans  -  walnut 

Umbelliferae  -  parsley  family 

Carya  -  hickory 

Leguminoseae  -  pea  family 

Salix  -  willow 

Rumex  acetosella  -  sheep  sorrel 

Populus  -  poplar 

Fraxinus  -  ash 

Rumex  mexicanus  -  dock 

Ulmus-elm 

Polygonaceae  -  smartweed  family 

Celtis  -  hackberry 


Morus  -  mulberry 

Labitae  -  mint  family 

Tilia  -  bass  wood 

Solanaceae  -  nightshade  family 

Rhamnus  -  buckthorn 

Nemopanthus  -  mountain  holly 

Solatium  -  nightshade 

Ilex  -  holly 

Physalis  -  ground  cherry 

Robinia  -  black  locust 

Rosaceae  -  rose  family 

Gleditsia  -  honey  locust 

Rosa  palustris  -  marsh  rose 

Cannabinaceae  -  hemp  family 

Scrophulariaceae  -  snapdragon  family 

Caryophyllaceae  -  pink  family 

Sambucus  -  Elderberry 

Lythrum  -  purple  loosestrife 

Primulaceae  -  primrose  family 

Apocynaceae  -  Indian  hemp  family 

Urtica  -  nettle 

Thalictrum  -  meadow  rue 

Ranunculaceae  -  buttercup  family 

Onagraceae  -  evening  primrose  family 

Plantago-lanceolata  -    lance-leaved  plantain 

Plantago-major  type  -  broad-leaved  plantain 

Onagraceae  -  evening  primrose  family 

Saxifragaceae  -  saxifrage  family 

Ribes  -  gooseberry/currant 

Liliacea  -  lily  family 

Malvaceae  -  mallow  family 

Vitaceae  -  vine  family 

Ericaceae  -  heath  family 

Cyperaceae  -  sedge  family 

Typha  -  cattail 

Campanulaceae  -  bluebell  family 

Euphorbiaceae  -  spurge  family 

Ephedra  -  joint  fir 

Phragmigtes  -  reed  grass  (reeds) 


Undetermined  -  not  recognized 


Undeterminable  -  too  degraded  to  recognize 


238    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


APF 


20      40       60      80    100% 
i_       '  |  |     _    ■ 


THEORETICAL  DISTRIBUTION  IN  SOIL  OF 
POLLENS  OF  DIFFERENT  AGES 
Cafter  Dimbleby  1985) 


Pollen  concentration 
per  gram  of  matrix 


6000        4000 


2000 


Percent  of  pollen 
which  appears  degraded 

0        0      20    40     60     80   100% 


THEORETICAL  POLLEN  CONCENTRATION 
AND  DEGRADATION  IN  A  SOIL  PROFILE 


Figure  12-4.  Theoretical  pollen  concentration,  degradation  and  differential  age 
distribution  patterns  in  soil. 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    239 


few  grains  have  been  leached  or  worm 
transported  to  the  bottom  of  the  deposit.  Pollen 
of  intermediate  age  is  appropriately 
concentrated  in  the  middle  of  the  profile,  with  a 
few  earthworm  deposited  grains  at  the  top  and 
bottom.  Pollen  stratigraphy  has  been  blurred 
but  not  destroyed  (Dimbleby  1985:  2-11). 


Pollen    Degradation 

Pollen  is  destroyed  by  the  oxygen  in  aerated 
groundwater  (Tschudy  1969:  95)  and  by  aerobic 
fungi  (Goldstein  1960:  453).  Both  the  amount  of 
pollen  present  in  a  given  unit  of  matrix  and  the 
condition  of  the  surviving  pollen  grains  decline 
with  the  length  of  time  the  pollen  is  exposed  to 
these  agents  of  degradation.  This  may  be  seen 
on  the  left  of  Dimbleby's  (1985:  fig.  3)  schematic 
(Figure  12-4,top),  where  the  absolute  pollen 
frequency  (i.e.,  pollen  concentration)  of  the 
younger  pollen  at  the  top  of  the  profile  is  much 
higher  than  that  of  the  older  pollen  at  the 
bottom.  When  tabulated,  the  numbers  of  pollen 
grains  which  are  recognizable  as  pollen  but 
which  are  too  degraded  to  identify  are  more 
numerous  in  deeper  (i.e.,  older)  samples  in  a 
normal  soil  profile  where  the  quantities  of 
surviving  pollen  grains  (i.e.,  pollen 
concentration)  are  smaller  (Kelso  1987b:  fig.  1; 
Kelso,  Mrozowski,  and  Fisher  1987:  fig.  6-2). 


Palynological   Record   Formation   Patterns 

The  number  of  possible  combinations  of 
cultural  site  formation  processes  and  natural 
matrix  accumulation  processes  and  pollen 
record  formation  processes  should  be  quite 
large.  Several  patterns  whose  validity  can  be 
supported  with  archeological  or  documentary 
data  have  already  been  recognized. 


The  Natural  Profile  Deposition  Pattern 

A  North  American  historic-era  example  of 
Dimbleby's  (1985:  fig.  3)  previously  discussed 
normal  soil  profile  development  curve  is 
presented  in  our  Figure  12-5.  These  pollen  data 
are  drawn  from  a  core  taken  on  a  formerly 
forested  hillside  adjacent  to  the  site  of  George 
Washington's  1754  Fort  Necessity  battleground. 
The  forest  was  cut  off  and  the  area  converted  to 
pasture  sometime  between  1856  and  1880.  This 
produced  a  leached  pollen  spectra  sequence  of 
arboreal  pollen  (forest),  weed  pollen  (clearance 
interval)  and  grass  (pasture)  pollen  from  the 
bottom  to  the  top  of  the  profile.  The 
resemblance  of  the  Fort  Necessity  sequence  to 


Dimbleby's  model  of  ancient,  intermediate,  and 
recent  pollen  in  a  soil  profile  is  unmistakable. 
The  Fort  Necessity  pollen  concentration  curve 
also  confoims  to  Dimbleby's  APF  model,  and 
distribution  of  unidentifiable  pollen  at  Fort 
Necessity  falls  into  the  predicted  pattern  with 
more  corroded  pollen  at  the  top  than  at  the 
bottom  of  the  profile. 

Pollen  movement  is  not  always  evident  in 
normal  cultural  sedimentation  sequences. 
Leaching  was  recognized  only  at  the  bottom  and 
top  of  a  17th-  through  19th-century  profile  from 
downtown  Boston  (Kelso  and  Beaudry  n.d.:  fig.  7) 
and  at  the  beginning  and  end  of  the  19th-  and 
20th-century  site  formation  processes  in  the 
backlot  of  profile  at  the  Kirk  Street  Agents' 
House  in  Lowell,  Massachusetts  (Kelso, 
Mrozowski,  and  Fisher  1987: 108, 112,  figs.  6-2, 6- 
3).  The  homogenization  of  spectra  characteristic 
of  earthworm  activity  zones  (Havinga  1974:  451) 
has  been  recognized  among  the  corroded  oak 
data  from  Fort  Necessity  (Kelso  1987b:  1)  but  has 
yet  to  be  reported  from  a  North  American  urban 
site.  It  is  possible  thai  sedimentation  proceeds 
too  quickly  in  the  urban  milieu  for  pollen 
movement  to  register.  It  is  also  possible  that  soil 
compaction  by  foot  traffic  prevented  effective 
leaching  and  that  contamination  by  industrial 
and  household  waste,  coal  dust  for  instance, 
rendered  soils  inhospitable  to  worms. 

When  leaching  occurs  in  slowly  aggrading 
profiles  it  can  be  analytically  advantageous, 
because  it  may  serve  to  separate  successive 
spectra  that  would  otherwise  be  unrecognizable 
within  the  same  matrix.  The  historical  pasture 
grass  and  subsequent  1843-1845  construction 
period  weeds  in  the  glacial  sand  at  the  bottom  of 
the  Square  "E"  profile  at  the  Kirk  Street  Agents' 
House  (Kelso,  Mrozowski,  and  Fisher  1987:  fig.  6- 
2)  and  the  whole  Fort  Necessity  sequence  are 
cases  in  point.  Such  leaching  phenomena  are,  of 
course,  palynologically  visible  only  when  there 
has  been  a  chronological  change  in  the 
contributing  flora. 


The  Episodic  Fill  Deposition  Pattern 

An  example  of  the  pollen  spectrum  of  an 
episodic  fill  is  provided  by  level  9  at  the  top  of  a 
profile  taken  in  the  Wilkinson  Hardware  Store 
backlot  in  the  central  business  district  of  Boston, 
Massachusetts  (Figure  12-6).  This  deposit  was 
introduced  when  the  present  Blackstone  Block 
of  buildings  was  constructed  ca.  1820-1825 
(Kelso  and  Beaudry  n.d.).  In  level  9,  pollen 
concentrations  are  highest  at  the  bottom  of  the 
level,  while  pollen  "too  degraded  to  recognize" 
and    the   proportion    of   "corroded    oaks,"   a 


240   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


depth  in  cm 


T1 

1' 

"I3 

S1 


*T3 

to 

3 
3 


O 

re" 

3 


m 

3 
n 


n 

o 

3 


33 

H 
O 

-n 

DO 

m 

J3 

m 
i— 
> 

> 

o 

— i 

I- 

c 

< 

m 

m 

Ml 

i- 

z 

71 

m 

2 

o 

m 

O 

I- 

m 

C/) 

|— 

z 

m 

CO 


o 

z 
> 

r~ 

CD 
> 
H 

H 

r~ 
m 
31 
m 
r- 
O 


o 

3J 

H 

Z 

m 
o 

m 

CO 
03 


s;      ■< 


depth  in  cm 


depth  in  cm 


oo 


ro 
...  I 


J 


-«% 


■o 


o 

05 


p_ 

^ 

-T 

- 

tJ 

_w 

t 

$ 


o 


^ 


-o 


a* 


o  -* 

03  CO 

_i  0) 

->l  -» 

<°  ^ 

^  00 

-•.  o 

CD 
CO 

o 


00  ^> 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    241 


prominent  type  which  retains  its  identity  while 
readily  degrading  (van  Zeist  1967:  49),  are 
highest  in  the  upper  portion  of  the  profile.  No 
pollen  at  all  was  recovered  from  an  additional, 
undiagrammed,  sample  at  the  top  of  the 
sequence.  Here  the  pollen  at  the  bottom  of  the 
level  was  protected  by  the  overburden  from  the 
corrosive  agents  that  progressively  destroyed 
pollen  as  they  worked  their  way  down  from  the 
top.  The  result  was  a  mirror  image  of  the 
sequence  predictable  in  a  normal  soil  profile 
development.  This  pattern  may  serve  as  the 
hallmark  of  an  episodic  fill  upon  which  no 
ground  cover  developed. 


The  Penetration  of  a  Fill  Pattern 

Modification  of  the  pollen  spectrum  of  an 
episodic  fill  by  a  ground  cover  developing  on  top 
of  the  fill  is  illustrated  by  level  2  at  the  top  of  the 
Square  J  profile  (1843-1930)  from  the  backlot  of 
the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House,  Lowell, 
Massachusetts  (Figure  12-7).  This  layer  is 
identified  as  a  fill  by  the  abrupt  change  in  pollen 
concentration  at  the  level  3/level  2  interface 
(Kelso,  Mrozowski,  and  Fisher  1987:  112).  The 
most  important  type  in  the  spectrum  of  the 
original  fill  was  grass,  while  the  ground  cover  that 
developed  on  top  of  the  fill  was  dominated  by 
the  wind-pollinated  Compositae  (i.e.,  ragweed). 
There  was  less  tree  pollen  and  more  cereal 
pollen  in  the  original  fill  than  was  characteristic 
of  the  pollen  rain  at  the  Kirk  Street  Agents' 
House. 

Sample  14/15  is  a  highly  organic,  intrusive  lens 
and  should  be  disregarded.  When  this  is  done 
the  pollen  concentrations  are  higher  in  the 
samples  at  the  top  of  the  layer  and  resemble 
those  of  a  naturally  developed  deposit.  Pollen 
degradation  measures  are,  however,  also  higher 
at  top  and  indicate  corrosive  agents  working 
their  way  down  from  the  top,  as  in  an  episodic  fill. 
The  depth  of  the  penetration  of  both  these 
agents  of  destruction  and  the  pollen  contributed 
by  the  later  ground  cover  is  indicated  by  the 
grass/wind-pollinated  Compositae  shift  at 
sample  15,  by  the  notch  in  the  cereal  pollen 
spectrum  between  sample  15,  and  by  the  surface 
and  the  block  of  high  arboreal  pollen 
percentages  extending  from  the  surface  down 
through  level  15. 


Results 

21N/8W   Northwest   Profile 

Artifact  data  indicate  that  this  profile  covers 
the    entire    1830s    to    1930s    boardinghouse 


occupation  period.  Three  gross  archeological 
levels  are  evident  at  the  sampling  locus  (Figure 
12-7).  The  oldest  of  these  is  the  sandy  deposit 
(level  1)  at  the  base  of  the  profile.  It  contained 
no  artifacts  and  appeared  to  be  glacial  in  origin. 
Pollen  samples  1  through  4  (8  cm  total)  were 
taken  from  this  layer.  Level  2  is  the  major 
occupation  layer  in  the  profile.  It  was  18  cm 
thick  where  pollen  samples  5  through  11  were 
taken.  The  artifact  content  of  level  2  suggests 
that  it  spans  the  last  three  quarters  of  the  19th 
century.  The  majority  of  the  cultural  materials 
were  recovered  from  the  upper  few  centimeters 
of  the  layer  and  appear  to  have  been  deposited 
post-1890  (Dutton,  this  volume).  Level  3  at  the 
top  of  the  profile  was  6  cm  thick  where  samples 
12  and  13  were  taken.  Its  cultural  inventory  was 
dominated  by  artifacts  dating  to  the  first  quarter 
of  the  20th  century  (Dutton,  this  volume). 

The  northwest  profile  pollen  spectra  (Figure 
12-9)  correlate  well  with  the  documentary  record 
of  land  use  (Bond  1989:  2-3),  with  the  matrix 
stratigraphy  of  the  profile  locus,  and  with  the 
archeology  based  material  culture  history  of  the 
backlot  (cf.  Dutton,  this  volume;  Cook,  this 
volume).  Pollen  concentrations  increased  from 
the  bottom  to  the  top  of  the  level  1  (glacial  sand) 
as  quantities  of  pollen  grains  "too  corroded  to 
recognize"  declined.  This  registers  a  slow, 
normal  soil  profile  development  process  with 
normal  pollen  leaching  and  degradation.  Level 
1  was  neither  a  typical  urban  active  occupation- 
period  archeological  stratum  (in  which 
development  is  too  rapid  for  leaching  and  pollen 
corrosion),  nor  an  episodic  fill  (in  which  the 
patterns  of  these  phenomena  might  be 
reversed). 

The  presence  of  grass  (Gramineae)  pollen 
resembling  that  of  reeds  (cf.  Phragmites)  and 
sedge  (Cyperaceae)  pollen  in  the  glacial 
appearing  sand  of  level  1  confirms  Beaudry's 
(1987:  73)  assessment  that  the  locus  was  poorly 
drained  when  first  observed  in  the  historical 
record.  Sedge  pollen  is  not  widely  dispersed 
(Handel  1976:  223),  and  these  counts  appear  to 
indicate  the  persistence  of  undeveloped 
conditions  on  or  very  near  the  sampling  locus. 
Clumps  of  reed  grass  have  aesthetic  appeal,  and 
moist  areas  could  also  have  been  part  of  the 
Boott  estate  landscaping  design. 

The  wind-pollinated  Compositae  are 
dominant  at  the  bottom  of  level  1.  This  type 
declines  steadily  toward  its  nadir  for  the  profile 
at  the  top  of  the  deposit.  The  insect-pollinated 
Compositae  and  dock  (Rumex  mexicanut-type) 
frequencies  increase  slightly  as  those  of  the 
wind-pollinated  Compositae  decrease,  while  the 
representation  of  grass   rises  as  a   block  in 


242   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


SCOTTOW'S  DOCK  TERRESTRIAL  PROFILE 
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 

CORROSION  MEASURES  VS.  POLLEN  CONCENTRATION 


,«°6e 


nd*-s  otAe     Pollen  concentration 

6°  .^voW* 


vae1 


\e< 
0  10      30      5,0  0  1.0      1Q%0 


CONTROL 


LEVEL  9 


LEVEL   10 


3 


LEVEL   12 


FEATURE   19 


LEVEL  14 


LEVEL  15 


I    I    I    I    I 


D 
] 
ID 


J. 


u 


=1 


JJ_L 


per  gram  of  matrix 

l^t    ft,,0      6^°,    fc~     \«\    O 


^    /-29,850-s 


3  X— 20.765 > 


35,590 


Figure  12-6.   Pollen  concentration  and  degradation  patterns,  Scottov/s  Dock,  Boston, 
Massachusetts,  ca.  1640-1820. 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Board inghouses    243 


s 


o 

a, 


3 
u 


o 

« 

3 
O 


c 
3 
bO 

2 


3     « 


244   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


oo  m 
g   A» 

309. 

HI  " 


3* 


% 

3 

-1 

u 

3* 
3 

a 

o_ 
n" 

3 
n 
O 


o 
n 

CD 

ET. 

O 

3 


-MM  co  I  -^  1  ai  Ta> 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    245 


samples  2  through  4.  Ragweed  (Ambrosia  spp.) 
is  among  the  most  pollen  prolific  wind- 
pollinated  members  of  the  Compositae  family 
and  probably  contributed  the  majority  of  the 
wind-pollinated  Compositae  pollen  in  the 
profile.  Ragweeds  are  the  dominant  weeds  in 
agricultural  fields  because  they  can  tolerate  the 
harsh  high  temperature  and  moisture  regimen 
of  newly-plowed  ground  (Bazzaz  1974).  Weeds 
such  as  dock  and  the  insect-pollinated 
Compositae  (the  Tubliflorae  in  Europe)  are  more 
prominent  in  the  disturbed  but  uncultivated 
waste  ground  around  the  periphery  of  fields  and 
along  roadsides  (Behre  1983:  fig.  2). 

In  other  sequences  where  grass  has  replaced 
ragweed,  a  reduction  in  human-caused  soil 
disturbance  is  historically  and  archeologically 
documented  (Kelso  and  Schoss  1983:  73;  Kelso 
1987b:  1).  An  opposite  sequence  of  grass 
declining  as  ragweed  counts  grew  larger 
indicated  increasing  soil  disturbance  at  another 
site  (Kelso,  Mrozowski,  and  Fisher  1987:  107).  In 
normal  historic  era  sequences  these  shifts  have 
been  gradual  (Kelso  and  Schoss  1983:  fig.  20; 
Kelso,  Mrozowski,  and  Fisher  1987:  fig.6-2),  even 
where  we  know  that  pasture  was  the  intended 
product  of  a  conscious  cultural  process  (Kelso 
1987b:  figs  1-4).  In  the  boardinghouse  21N8W 
northwest  profile  the  wind-pollinated 
Compositae  decline  gradually,  but  the  increase 
in  grass  pollen  is  quite  abrupt.  The  shift  in  wind- 
pollinated  Compositae  is  consistent  with  the 
gradual  leaching  of  pollen  down  through  the 
matrix  profile  that  is  indicated  by  pollen 
concentration  and  degradation  measures.  The 
change  in  grass  is  not.  A  unique  circumstance  in 
which  old  wind-pollinated  Compositae  pollen 
from  a  defunct  population  gradually  leached  out 
of  the  profile  while  grass  pollen  was  introduced 
into  the  system  from  a  new,  rapidly  developed 
population  seems  to  be  indicated.  This  suggests 
that  the  grass  was  planted.  It  probably  did  not 
grow  in  Nathan  Tyler's  pre-Lowell  pasture. 
European  cereal  pollen  (cerealia  or  cereal-type) 
and  corn  (Zea  mays)  pollen  from  livestock 
manure  correlated  with  grass  in  four  widely 
spaced  cores  at  Fort  Necessity,  and  there  were 
more  kinds  of  weeds  and  more  pollen  of 
individual  weedy  taxa  than  occurs  here  in  Lowell 
(Kelso  1987b:  figs.  1-4). 

We  may  have  either  Kirk  Boott's  lawn  or  his 
hayfield  reflected  in  the  level  1  grass  pollen 
counts  (Beaudry  1987a:  75).  Hayfields  were 
actively  planted  as  part  of  crop  rotation  during 
the  19th  century  (Russell  1976:  279,  313).  If  a 
hayfield  is  recorded  in  the  level  1,  it  was  never 
manured  in  the  best  practice  but  neither  was  it 
permitted  go  to  weeds  as  was  often  the  case 


(Russell  1976:  366).  The  1825  plan  (Figure  12-1) 
of  the  Boott  estate  overlain  on  the  plots  where 
the  Boott  Mills  boardinghouses  were 
constructed  (Beaudry  1987a:  fig.  7-2)  suggests 
that  our  sampling  locus  is  so  close  to  the  former 
site  of  the  mansion  house  that  the  grass  pollen 
that  dominates  level  1  most  probably  reflects 
lawn. 

There  is  a  third  possible  interpretation. 
Carefully  tended  oval  lawns  (Figure  12-10)  are 
depicted  in  the  1852  mill  yard  by  Gleason's 
Pictorial  (Beaudry  1987a:  12,  fig.  3-2).  The 
possibility  exists  that  the  grass  of  layer  1  post- 
dates Kirk  Boott  and  that  there  was  an  element 
of  fact  in  the  obvious  public  relations  effort  of 
the  Gleason's  illustration  (Figure  12-11).  A 
problem  with  the  lawn  hypothesis  is  that 
earthworms  should  be  present  in  sod.  The 
relatively  uniform  grass,  oak  (Quercus),  total 
arboreal  pollen  and  "corroded  oak"  frequencies 
resemble  the  worm-homogenized  horizons 
described  by  Havinga  (1973)  and  Dimbleby 
(1985:  figs.  6,  7),  but  these  do  not  carry  through  in 
the  other  spectra. 

At  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House  there  was 
evidence  for  construction-related  soil 
disturbance  in  the  deepest  occupation  deposits, 
level  6  of  Square  "E"  (Kelso,  Mrozowski,  and 
Fisher  1987:  108).  In  the  boardinghouse  backlot 
the  block  of  grass  frequencies  in  level  1  were  not 
distorted  by  such  activities,  and  there  are  no 
indications  of  leaching  from  level  2  and  no  well 
defined  zone  of  high  frequencies  at  the  top  of 
level  1,  such  as  often  marks  a  buried  surface  in 
profiles  (Dimbleby  1985:  45).  Sod  could  have 
protected  level  1  from  leaching  and  disturbance 
during  the  boardinghouse  construction  interval, 
but  it  must  have  been  removed  or  the  profile 
cleanly  truncated  before  deposition  of  level  2 
commenced.  The  absence  of  any  trace  of 
humus  at  the  top  of  level  1  suggests  that  this  was 
the  case. 

Artifact  data  suggest  that  level  2  is  associated 
with  the  boardinghouse  rather  than  with  the 
Boott  estate.  Grass  declines  abruptly  and  the 
wind-pollinated  Compositae  portion  of  the 
spectrum  increases  at  the  bottom  of  the  level. 
Goosefoot  (Chenopodiaceae),  insect-pollinated 
Compositae,  and  vine  (Vitaceae)  frequencies 
also  increase  at  the  base  of  level  2,  but  the 
percentages  of  virtually  all  non-arboreal  pollen 
types  are  relatively  stable  up  to  sample  10. 
Except  for  sample  7,  which  was  an  intrusive  lens 
of  glacial  sand,  pollen  concentrations  rise 
through  the  level,  and  the  quantities  of  pollen 
"too  degraded  to  identify"  decline  in  a  fairly 
orderly  manner.  This  was  a  normal  matrix 
accumulation  situation  in  which  ground  cover 


246   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


was  relatively  stabile  from  construction  in  the 
1830s  up  to  the  last  decade  of  the  19th  century. 

Weeds  were  predominant  over  grass  in  the 
backlot.  No  attempt  was  made  to  develop  any 
particular  kind  of  ground  cover,  but  this  does  not 
mean  that  the  backlot  was  unkempt. 

Comparative  data  provide  a  general  estimate 
of  the  nature  of  the  ground  cover.  The  deposits 
are  roughly  contemporaneous  with  those  of  the 
Kirk  Street  Agents'  House  backlot,  yet  much  less 
trash  was  deposited  in  the  boardinghouse 
backlots  than  behind  that  higher  socio- 
economic class  dwelling  (Dutton,  this  volume). 
The  presence  of  European  cereal  and  corn 
pollen  in  level  2  suggests  disposal  of  some 
organic  waste  in  the  backlot,  but  there  are  many 
fewer  grains  of  these  types  here  than  in  the  Kirk 
Street  backlot,  even  compared  to  the  period 
when  that  structure  served  as  a  non-Boott 
Corporation  boardinghouse  (Beaudry  1987b:  27). 
There  were  only  21  non-arboreal  pollen  types 
attributable  to  weedy  taxa  in  this  boardinghouse 
backlot  profile  compared  to  31  in  the  Square  "E" 
sequence  behind  the  agent's  dwelling,  and  the 
majority  of  those  found  at  the  boardinghouse 
were  represented  by  much  smaller  pollen 
percentages.  Dandelion-type  (Liguliflorae)  is  a 
good  example.  It  was  present  in  grassy  level  1, 
absent  from  the  boardinghouse  occupation 
period  level  2,  and  reappeared  in  weedy,  post- 
habitation  level  3.  The  general  impression 
derived  from  these  spectra  is  that  of  a  relatively 
barren  plot  that  was  maintained  to  present  an 
orderly,  utilitarian  appearance  over  a  lengthy 
period.  This  is  consistent  with  the  Boott  Mills 
management's  pragmatic,  instrumental 
approach  to  employee  housing  under  the 
principal  of  corporate  paternalism  that  Bond 
(1987, 1989)  documents. 

Ground  cover  in  the  backlot  changed  in  the 
late  19th  century.  Artifact  deposition,  especially 
debris  associated  with  foreign-born  males, 
increased  toward  the  top  of  level  2  (infra: 
Chapters  3,  12).  Contemporaneous  increases  in 
wind-pollinated  Compositae  frequencies  and 
further  declines  in  the  grass  pollen  percentages 
are  evident  in  the  pollen  spectra  calculated  from 
non-arboreal  sums  in  samples  10  and  11.  Pollen 
concentrations  rise  rather  abruptly  at  this  point, 
and  the  lack  of  a  parallel  increase  in  wind- 
pollinated  Compositae  percentages  based  on 
the  sum  of  all  pollen,  AP  and  NAP,  can  be 
attributed  to  statistical  suppression  by  the 
increase  in  the  elm  (Ulmus)  pollen  contribution 
in  these  same  samples.  The  spectra  appear  to 
reflect  a  real  further  expansion  in  the  local  weed 
population  at  the  expense  of  grass  in  the  backlot. 
The  backlot  evidently  became  a  little  disorderly, 


but  the  changes  recorded  here  are  much 
smaller  than  those  that  might  be  anticipated 
from  the  published  descriptions  of  tenements 
and  lodging  houses  managed  by  slum  lords  such 
as  Saiman  Sirk  (Bell  1987:a  67;  Bond,  1989:  9). 
The  pollen  data  imply  that  maintenance 
standards  were  not  abandoned  in  Boott 
Corporation  managed  properties,  they  just 
slipped  a  little. 

Maintenance  slippage  in  the  Boott  Mills 
operation  may  not  have  been  restricted  to  the 
boardinghouses.  A  single  grain  of  cattail  (Typha) 
pollen  was  noted  in  sample  5  at  the  bottom  of 
level  2.  This  pollen  grain  should  date  to  the  2nd 
quarter  of  the  19th  century.  A  cluster  of  small 
counts  of  cattail  pollen  occurs  in  samples  9,  10, 
11,  and  12.  These  samples  date  to  the  late  19th 
and  early  20th  centuries.  Cattails  prefer  rooting 
in  shallow  water,  and  the  closest  source  for  this  is 
the  Eastern  Canal,  adjacent  to  the 
boardinghouses  on  the  north.  Water  power  for 
the  Boott  Mills  was  augmented  by  steam 
engines  in  the  1859  to  1873  period  (Beaudry 
1987:a  11).  The  establishment  of  cattail 
populations  in  the  canal  thereafter  suggests 
negligence  which  permitted  silt  to  build  up  in 
the  canal  and/or  vegetation  to  become 
established  between  the  stones. 

The  depositional  environment  of  the  backlot 
changed  again  in  the  20th  century.  Percentages 
of  individual  herb  pollen  types  based  on  the 
non-arboreal  sum  in  samples  12  and  13  differ 
little  from  those  of  19th-century  samples  10  and 
11,  but  pollen  concentrations  decline  abruptly 
from  almost  16,000  to  less  than  6,000  pollen 
grains  per  gram  of  matrix.  Such  a  pollen 
disposition  suggests  that  the  kinds  of  herbs  in 
and  around  the  boardinghouse  backlot 
remained  roughly  the  same  but  that  there  were 
a  lot  fewer  of  them.  Pollen  concentrations  are 
normally  higher  in  the  four  centimeters  of  a 
profile  nearest  the  surface,  and  the  high  pollen 
concentrations  in  samples  10  and  11  (2  cm  each) 
are  comparable  to  Dimbleby's  (1985:  45)  buried 
surface.  It  normally  requires  deeper  burial  to 
protect  such  a  surface  (Dimbleby  1985:  60),  and 
the  inability  of  oxygen  and  aerobic  fungi  to 
penetrate  these  4  cm  suggests  special 
conditions.  Soil  compaction  seems  the  to  be  the 
explanation  most  consistent  with  the  reduction 
in  backlot  ground  cover.  In  contradistinction, 
the  proportions  of  both  pollen  grains  "too 
degraded  to  identify"  and  "corroded  oak" 
increase  abruptly  in  the  upper  4  cm  of  the 
profile.  A  zone  of  high  pollen  degradation  like 
that  evident  in  samples  12  and  13  can  reflect 
aeration  of  the  surface  matrix  through 
continuous,   shallow   soil  disturbance   (Kelso 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouscs    247 


Arboreal  Pollen 


■?    f" 
c«      if 


J>  J  ./ 


**        <•<■  B*W  *'    ** 


1 

t    ) 

'  :; 

r-*  S*1  «*  «•"*   ^  $■*  *° 


f  1  $  if  f 

IP 

'Iff 

1 

./^ 


Non-Arboreal  Pollen 


%  based  on  total  pollen  sum     -■=,    %  based  on  AP  or  NAP  sum  only  .  Single  pollen  grains 


Figure  12-9.  Relative  pollen  frequencies,  21N/8W,  northwest  profile. 


248   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Arboreal  Polle 


**  «*    $*  *°  ^  ^° 


J 

J 

3 

_J 

] 

3 
1 

n 

./ 


1      u 

£ 

n 

P  f 

5 

0  6%      02*         01ft 


9ft    01ft  0     3»01* 


I       I       I       I      I       )      I l_l 


~£. 


%  based  on  total  pollen  sum 


%  based  on  AP  or  NAP  sum  only 


Single  pollen  grains 


Figure  12-10.   Relative  pollen  frequencies,  21N/8W,  northeast  profile. 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Board inghouses    249 


<N 

& 

c 

1/5 

••"* 

3 

| 

•a 

c 

o 

**** 

.■S  £ 

a, 

3 

•*-< 

jm 

c 

~c 

QJ 

o 

V 

3 

A 

jy 

ON 

o 

r-" 

c 

>> 

1C 

i 

QJ 

X. 

•-•- 

•n 

o 

1 

QJ 
bO 
n3 

D~ 

g 

TJ 

i 

.a 

E 

QJ 

*j 

3 

o 

18 

c 

03 

0) 

i/> 

.c 

c 

** 

0) 

u-, 

■/> 

o 

01 

S 

(X 

01 

'5 

OJ 

d 

< 

QJ 
U 
l/> 

r— 

-a 

t— < 

a 

| 

N 

ri 

;c 

rH 

'-*-* 

QJ 

c 

bO 

03 

6 

ES 

o 

250    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


1987b:  4,  fig.  4).  Between  1918  and  ca.  early  1934 
the  Boott  Mills  boardinghouses  at  45-48  James 
(Sirk)  Street  served  as  storage  accommodations 
(Clancey  1987:  32).  The  constellation  of 
spectrum  features  characteristic  of  level  3 
indicates  a  barren,  slowly  (if  at  all)  aggrading, 
compacted  deposit  with  a  frequently,  but 
shallowly,  disturbed  surface  that  is  consistent 
with  the  loading  yard  of  such  a  facility. 

The  arboreal  pollen  of  urban  sites  is  more 
difficult  to  interpret  than  the  non-arboreal 
spectra.  It  starts  out  at  a  higher  altitude  where 
wind  velocities  are  greater  and  it  is  less  subject 
to  vegetative  filtration.  Arboreal  pollen  in  a  non- 
forested  region  generally  reflects  regional  rather 
than  local  vegetation  (Janssen  1973:  33).  Little 
patterned  variation  is  evident  among  urban 
arboreal  pollen  spectra,  and  local  ornamental 
trees  have  yet  to  be  reported  among  urban 
spectra.  Except  as  a  foil  in  assessing  the  relative 
density  of  local  ground  cover  (Kelso  n.d.;  Kelso 
and  Beaudry  n.d.),  arboreal  pollen  in  urban 
matrices  has  provided  few  significant  land-use 
data. 

The  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse  backlots  may 
be  an  exception.  Three  pollen  types,  oak,  pine 
(Pinus),  and  elm,  display  the  high  frequency, 
high  amplitude  variations  characteristic  of  local 
pollen  spectra  (Janssen  1973:  34).  The  peaks  of 
elm  frequencies  in  samples  5  and  6  and  9-11 
coincide  with  peaks  of  arboreal  pollen  in  the 
total  sum,  suggesting  that  there  were  real 
increases  in  the  contributions  of  this  type  during 
these  intervals.  If  Sample  5  dates  to  ca.  1836  and 
sample  12  dates  to  ca.  1919,  each  rising  and 
falling  phase  in  the  level  2  arboreal  pollen  ratio 
could  have  consumed  40  years.  This  is  adequate 
for  the  maturation  of  an  elm  tree  (Fowells  1965), 
and  it  appears  that  these  spectra  record  the 
development  and  demise  of  two  generations  of 
local  ornamental  trees  no  more  than  300  yards 
from  the  sampling  locus  (Janssen  1973:  33).  Oak 
and  pine  dominate  the  arboreal  spectra  of  level 
1  but  decline  abruptly  at  the  level  1 /level  2 
interface.  Both  types  increase  for  a  period  in  the 
middle  of  level  2  and  in  level  3  at  the  top  of  the 
profile,  with  pine  most  prominent  in  level  2  and 
oak  increasing  most  in  level  3.  This  distribution 
constitutes  a  rough  mirror  image  of  the  elm 
profile  and  suggests  that  pine  and  oak  were  part 
of  the  regional  rather  than  the  local  pollen 
spectrum  and  that  their  frequencies  were 
responding  statistically  to  real  changes  in  the 
elm  contribution.  Whether  these  elms  were 
intentional  ornamental  plantings  or  natural 
intrusives  cannot  be  determined  from  the  pollen 
type  itself. 


Buckthorn  (Rhamnus)  is  a  low  tree  now  most 
often  noted  at  the  edges  of  secondary  woodland. 
Its  pollen  is  dispersed  more  like  non-arboreal 
than  arboreal  types  and  reflects  local  rather  than 
regional  vegetation  (Kelso  and  Beaudry  n.d.). 
The  expansion  of  the  pollen  contribution  of  this 
taxon  parallel  to  that  of  the  elms  suggests  that 
the  shrubby  conditions  often  evident  on  urban 
lot  borders  were  developing  in  the  vicinity  of  the 
boardinghouses. 

It  is  also  worth  noting  that  chestnut  (Castanea) 
and  hickory  (Carya)  are  much  better 
represented  in  levels  2  and  3  than  in  level  1. 
Both  trees  were  prominent  in  the  European 
contact  era  forest  of  New  England  (Braun  1950), 
but  neither  is  well  represented  in  the  pollen 
spectra  of  lake  sequences.  The  counts  of  these 
types  in  the  boardinghouse  backlot  appear  to  be 
derived  from  urban  ornamentals  rather  from  the 
regional  pollen  rain.  The  location  of  the  parent 
trees  relative  to  the  boardinghouses  cannot  be 
determined,  but  the  uniformity  of  the  spectra, 
compared  to  those  of  elm,  suggests  a  source 
area  broad  enough  for  homogenization  of  the 
pollen  contributions  of  individual  or  discrete 
groups  of  emitters.  Janssen's  (1973:  33)  data 
suggest  a  300-yard  cut-off  for  recognizing  point 
sources  in  unforested  areas,  and  the  uniformity 
of  the  chestnut  and  hickory  spectra  suggest  that 
the  counts  reflect  the  tree  population  of  the  town 
as  a  whole  rather  than  the  immediate  vicinity  of 
the  boardinghouses  (Janssen  1973:  33). 

The  vine  family  does  not  fit  either  the  arboreal 
or  non-arboreal  pollen  category  well.  As  woody 
perennials,  their  populations  should  not  respond 
as  rapidly  to  cultural  change  as  the  annual  herbs 
that  contribute  most  of  the  non-arboreal  pollen 
classification.  Vines  climb,  but  the  majority  do 
not  reach  the  altitudes  from  which  the  arboreal 
pollen  that  constitutes  the  major  portion  of  the 
regional  pollen  spectrum  is  launched.  In  most 
sites  the  question  is  moot.  Vine  family  pollen  is 
not  massively  produced  nor  widely  dispersed.  It 
is  relatively  rare  in  soil  samples  of  any  kind  and 
its  occurrences  are  generally  unpatterned. 

The  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse  vine  pollen 
counts  are  unusual.  Only  a  few  grains  were 
found  in  level  1,  and  the  type  is  absent  or 
irregularly  represented  in  the  deeper  samples  of 
level  2.  In  sample  8  and  above,  however,  it  is 
present  in  noticeable  amounts  in  all  counts  and 
reaches  6%  of  sample  10.  This  pattern  suggests 
the  presence  of  a  few  plants  early  in  the 
occupation  and  development  of  a  significant 
local  vine  population  during  the  latter  half  of  the 
occupation  (level  2)  and  storehouse  interval 
(level  3).  Other  spectra  suggest  that  the 
boardinghouse  backlot  was  bare  and  utilitarian, 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    251 


while  the  worklot  of  the  storehouse  period  was 
barren  and  subject  to  heavy  traffic.  It  seems 
unlikely  that  either  grapes  or  ground  covering 
vines  growing  within  the  backlot  contributed  this 
pollen.  At  present  both  the  rail  along  the  edge  of 
the  Eastern  Canal  (between  the  boardinghouses 
and  the  mill)  and  the  south  wall  of  the  mill  itself 
are  covered  with  Boston  ivy  (Parthenocissus 
tricuspidata).  It  is  possible  that  some  of  these 
ornamentals,  Asiatic  members  of  the  vine 
family,  were  growing  on  the  boardinghouses  or 
ells  as  well  as  on  the  mills.  The  level  2  vine 
pollen  counts  suggest  that  mill  management 
may  have  made  efforts  to  soften  the  utilitarian, 
institutional  architecture  they  had  erected  with 
such  climbing  vines  at  a  relatively  early  date.  It 
is  also  possible,  if  not  probable,  that  these  vines, 
the  previously  discussed  buckthorn,  and 
perhaps  some  of  the  chestnuts,  hickories,  and 
elms,  simply  reflect  development  of  the  normal, 
tolerated  but  perhaps  not  encouraged, 
northeastern  urban  flora  on  the  farmland  that 
had  been  stripped  to  create  the  city  of  Lowell  in 
the  early  19th  century. 


21N/8W,    Northeast    Profile 

Level  3  was  not  observed  at  this  profile 
location,  and  the  window  glass  cap  deposited  on 
the  backlot  during  dismantling  of  the 
boardinghouse  directly  overlay  level  2  (Figure 
12-12).  Level  2  appeared  rather  homogeneous, 
displaying  none  of  the  color  variations  and 
texture  lenses  evident  in  the  northwest  profile. 
The  profile  location  is  considered  to  be  a  feature 
of  some  sort  (David  H.  Dutton,  personal 
communication,  1989),  even  though  no  pit  edges 
or  other  feature  indicators  were  evident  in  the 
excavation  wall.  The  pollen  data  (Figure  12-10) 
concur  with  this  assessment  but  suggest  that 
there  was  some  complexity  to  the  development 
of  the  feature  fill. 

The  northeast  profile  pollen  concentration 
and  "corroded  oak"  and  "too  degraded  to 
recognize"  measures  suggest  three  deposition 
stages  in  the  matrix  profile.  The  earliest  stage 
corresponds  to  the  level  1  (glacial?)  sand  at  the 
bottom  of  the  profile  and  is  characterized  by  a 
very  regular  sequence  in  which  pollen 
preservation  declines  down  through  the  layer 
while  pollen  concentrations  get  larger  toward  the 
top.  This  appears  to  record  the  normal 
leaching/degradation  pattern  of  a  natural 
matrix  development  process  of  the  sort  that  was 
evident  in  the  northwest  profile  data.  The  counts 
of  the  individual  taxa  in  the  northeast  profile 
level  1,  however,  differ  markedly.  Dock, 
European  cereal  type,  chestnut,  hickory  and  elm 


frequencies  were  all  low  in  the  northwest  profile 
while  reed  and  sedge  counts  were  relatively  high. 
This  arrangement  is  preserved  only  in  the 
deepest  one  or  two  samples  of  the  northeast 
profile.  Even  in  those  samples  these  types  are 
not  consistent  across  the  spectrum,  while  no 
patterns  are  evident  among  the  grass,  wind- 
pollinated  Compositae,  pine,  and  oak 
percentages.  In  contrast  these  were  significant 
in  interpreting  level  1  in  the  northwest  profile. 
Later,  boardinghouse  period  pollen  appears  to 
have  penetrated  level  1  in  this  northeast  profile 
without  seriously  disrupting  Boott  mansion  era 
concentration  and  degradation  patterns.  The 
quantity  need  not  have  been  large  because  level 

1  concentrations  were  low,  but  it  was  sufficient  to 
largely  mask  the  pollen  spectrum  of  the  earlier 
period. 

Samples  4  through  8  in  the  bottom  half  of  level 

2  constitutes  the  second  depositional  interval  in 
the  21N/8W  northeast  profile  (Figure  12-10).  It 
is  characterized  by  pollen  concentrations,  which 
increase  abruptly  at  the  lower  interface  of  the 
level  at  sample  4  and  continue  to  rise  irregularly 
until  they  drop  off  with  equal  suddenness  above 
sample  7.  Both  the  "corroded  oak"  and  "too 
degraded  to  identify"  are  stable  in  the  deepest 
two  samples  but  rife  moderately  in  samples  6 
and  7.  This  distribution  of  pollen  preservation 
measures  suggests  an  episodic  fill,  and  the 
pollen  concentration  pattern  suggests  the 
presence  of  a  ground  cover  or,  at  least  a  local 
pollen  input  to  the  top  of  the  fill,  which  exceeded 
the  average  pre-deposition  pollen  content  of  the 
fill.  A  brief  peak  of  total  arboreal  pollen  in 
sample  7  among  the  AP/NAP  ratios  suggests 
that  some  of  the  input  was  arboreal,  but  a  single 
high  count  may  be  coincidental. 

The  third  21N/8W  depositional  zone 
incorporates  samples  8  through  12  at  the  top  of 
the  profile.  It  is  characterized  by  pollen 
concentrations  that  drop  off  abruptly  and  then 
remain  relatively  stable  in  the  upper  fill.  The 
percentages  of  "corroded  oak"  and  total  pollen 
"too  corroded  to  identify"  rise  toward  the  top  of 
the  profile,  but  the  apparent  trend  in  this  last 
category  is  the  product  of  a  single  low  count  and 
may  not  be  real.  A  definite  change  in  the  matrix 
depositional  regimen  is  indicated,  and  samples  9 
through  12  probably  originated  in  an  episodic 
fill.  The  profile  at  this  location  has  been 
truncated.  The  sheet  deposit  of  broken  window 
glass  from  the  1934  dismantling  of  the 
boardinghouse  directly  overlies  level  2.  Level  3 
is  missing.  Some  of  this  pollen  zone  was 
probably  also  lost,  and  we  cannot  ascertain  the 
later  ground  cover  history  at  this  locus. 


252    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


0  5  10 


scale  in 
centimeters 


Window  glass  layer  1934 


LEVEL  2 

19th  C 


LEVEL   1 

Glacial  sand 


Figure  12-12.  Palynologist's  field  sketch:  soil  stratigraphy  and  pollen  column  location, 
21N/8W,  northeast  profile. 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Board inghouses    253 


t£    •*•*  O* 


Non- Arboreal  Pollen 


/      / 


»*     *  *      »!>v     A     .        .  *,*  £  *°  <?°    "      J-       a  <,tf 


D 


r 


F" 


%  based  on  total  pollen  sum     ■■■=)    %  based  on  AP  or  NAP  sum  only  •  Single  pollen  grains 


Figure  12-13.  Relative  pollen  frequencies.  Feature  27  and  Feature  65. 


254   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


ARBOREAL  POLLEN 


jjP 


«■»  „<*    /"     „*' 

22%, 4%.     53b 


3.%°      8%.?%  .    .3.*. 3*.        4.%  .2,%.      .3*0  2.0  33%  ; 


/>//     V.aV   / 


yi^iiTT^T¥TitTi  ff)  f 


□    rr~~3  *      n      1    •    0     •    •     o 


0      20      40      60      76%     n  m 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1  r  1  ■  1 

P 


*=ihb  iDtirtiprittx  im  iiiiq  r^  & 


NON-ARBOREAL  POLLEN 


IIUtllllUIPD: 


sed  on  total  pollen  sun- 


%  Based  on  AP  or  NAP  sum  only 


•    Single  pollen  grain 


Figure  12-14.   Relative  pollen  frequencies.  Feature  61. 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    255 


Feature   27 

Feature  27  was  an  oval,  60  cm  x  160  cm, 
apparent  former  pit  just  north  of  the  45  James 
(Sirk)  Street  cellar  stairs  in  Operation  A  (Figure 
12-3).  The  fill  stratigraphy  wa&  amorphous,  and 
the  few  artifacts  recovered  provided  no 
functional  data.  There  were  no  new  types,  but 
the  arrangement  of  the  pollen  spectra  does 
provide  some  data  on  the  origin  of  the  feature  fill 
(Figure  12-13). 

Pollen  concentrations,  although  irregular  are 
much  lower  at  the  top  of  the  profile  than  at  the 
bottom,  while  the  "corroded  oak"  and  "too 
degraded  to  recognize"  categories  indicate  that 
pollen  preservation  was  much  better  at  the 
bottom  of  the  deposit  than  at  the  top.  Such  data 
suggest  the  "penetration  of  a  fill  pattern"  rather 
than  the  "natural  profile  development  pattern" 
described  in  the  introduction.  This 
interpretation,  however,  appears  improbable 
because  it  would  require  the  agents  of  pollen 
degradation  to  penetrate  about  26  cm  of  fill  in 
feature  27  while  noticeably  influencing  only  the 
top  4  cm  of  the  21W/8N  profile  and  only  the 
upper  6  cm  of  the  21 W/8N  northwest  profile  and 
feature  61. 

The  distributions  of  the  individual  types 
suggest  something  different.  Sedge,  grass,  oak, 
pine  and  alder  (Alnus),  were  most  prominent  at 
the  bottom  of  the  natural  21W/8N  profile,  while 
wind-pollinated  Compositae,  chestnut,  dock,  elm 
and  vine  family  were  low  in  level  1  compared  to 
levels  2  and  3  of  the  21W/8N  sequence.  These 
relationships  are  inverted  in  feature  27.  The 
depressed  pollen  concentrations  seen  in  level  3 
of  21W/8N  ended  up  on  the  very  bottom  of  the 
feature  27  pit.  These  were  followed  by  the  high 
pollen  concentrations  of  upper  level  2,  the 
progressively  lower  concentrations  of  deeper 
matrix  recorded  in  21W/8N,  and  the  sedge  and 
lowest  pollen  concentrations  of  the  21N/8W 
natural  level  1  as  a  cap  for  feature  27.  The 
correlations  here  are  not  exact,  and  some  of  the 
frequencies  involved  are  admittedly  small,  but 
they  do  appear  to  reflect  reversed  stratigraphy. 
The  feature  27  excavation  was  not  filled  with  the 
same  dirt  that  was  removed  to  create  it.  Some 
other  part  of  the  backlot  was  mined  for  this 
purpose.  Why  this  was  done  is  not  evident,  but 
the  proximity  of  the  feature  to  the  cellar 
foundation  suggested  to  Beaudry  that  a 
troublesome  tree  might  have  been  removed.  In 
such  a  case  the  hole  left  by  the  stump  would 
require  extra  dirt.  The  presence  of  what  appears 
to  be  a  set  of  buttons  from  a  single  garment  in 
the  feature  27  fill  (Ziesing,  this  volume)  suggest 
that  it  may  also  have  received  some  primary 
refuse,  and  Mrozowski's  macrofossil  data  (this 


volume)  suggest  that  the  hypothetical  offending 
gorwth  may  have  been  an  elderberry  bush 
(Sambucus    canadensis). 


Feature   65 

This  clump  of  loam  still  incorporating  a  root 
mass  had  been  sunk  into  a  disturbed  area  at 
23N/8W  in  Operation  B  (Figure  12-2). 
Someone  either  planted  a  greenhouse  product 
or  transferred  a  potted  plant  outdoors.  No 
unique  pollen  types  were  noted  in  this  sample 
(Figure  12-13,  bottom).  Pollen  concentrations 
are  relatively  high,  and  there  is  no  exact  match 
between  the  feature  65  loam  counts  and  any 
other  spectrum.  Frequencies  of  the  individual 
types  present  are,  however,  within  the  general 
range  for  the  rest  of  the  site,  and  it  is  possible 
that  the  loam  acquired  its  pollen  spectrum 
locally.  If  so,  the  pollen  concentrations,  oak,  pine 
and  elm  counts  suggest  that  it  dates  to  the  late 
19th  century  and  is  roughly  contemporaneous 
with  21N/8W  northwest  profile  sample  10. 


Feature   61 

This  privy  was  located  5  m  due  east  of  the 
south  wall  of  the  ell  foundation  in  Operation  B 
(Figure  12-2).  We  have  no  construction  data  for 
the  structure.  Documentary  sources  indicate 
that  it  went  out  of  service  between  1887  and  1889, 
but  its  artifact  content  suggest  that  it  was  not 
filled  until  after  1910  (Bond  1989:  7).  A  12- 
sample  profile  was  collected  in  4-cm  segments 
from  a  possible  wood  plank  vault  floor  at  56  cm 
depth  to  the  top  of  level  2.  The  upper  few 
centimeters,  incorporating  level  3,  had  been 
removed  in  exposing  the  privy  superstructure 
foundation  and  could  not  be  sampled.  A 
concentration  of  wood  remains  between  samples 
7  and  8  left  a  gap  in  the  sequence,  and  the  profile 
segment  incorporating  samples  8  through  12  was 
backed  by  planking  structural  remnants  (Figure 
12-14). 

Four  pollen  zones  are  evident  in  the  Feature 
61  sequence  (Figure  12-15).  Samples  1  and  2  at 
the  bottom  of  the  profile  constitute  the  deepest. 
Pollen  concentrations  and  the  "degraded  oak" 
counts  of  both  samples  are  the  largest  in  the 
profile.  The  "too  degraded  to  identify"  category 
and  the  spruce  (Picia)  oak,  chestnut,  grass,  wild 
oat-type  (Avena-fatua-type),  and  wind-pollinated 
Compositae  counts  are  highest  for  the  feature, 
but  only  in  one  or  the  other  of  the  samples.  The 
elm  percentage  of  sample  1  is  also  relatively 
large  for  the  deeper  fill,  while  the  proportion  of 
arboreal  pollen  in  sample  2  is  notably  depressed. 


256    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


I      I  base  of  level  3 


|12| 


111 


WOOD  PLANK 
BACKING  BEHIND 
PROFILE 


PLANKING/WOOD  FRAGMENTS 


T7 

LL_L 


HONEYCOMBED    /v»-, j 

WOOD  6 


4 
3 
2 
|1 


0  5  10 


scale  in  centimeters 


WOOD  PLANKING 

I       I 
I       l 


Figure  12-15.  Palynologist's  field  sketch:  fill  stratigraphy  and  pollen  column  location, 
north  wall,  Feature  61. 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    257 


Only  the  pollen  concentrations  are  conspicuous. 
These  essentially  define  the  zone,  and  the 
abrupt  decline  in  pollen  concentration  in  sample 
3  suggests  a  change  in  the  source  of  the  matrix. 
These  samples  immediately  overlie  what 
appears  to  have  been  the  plank  floor  of  the  vault. 
There  were  no  high  or  unusual  economic  pollen 
counts  of  the  sort  noted  in  some  18th-  and  19th- 
century  privies  (Reinhard,  Mrozowski,  and 
Orloski  1986;  Kelso  1986a),  and  Reinhard  (this 
volume)  found  little  evidence  of  the  intestinal 
parasites  normally  associated  with  fecal 
deposits.  Feature  61  was  apparently  emptied 
before  it  was  filled.  Not  all  historical  nightsoil 
deposits  have,  however,  proven  palynologically 
distinctive  (Kelso  n.d.),  and  the  zone  could  still 
incorporate  a  remnant  of  the  occupation-period 
vault  contents.  The  relatively  high  phosphorus 
content  of  the  deeper  privy  samples  (Fisher,  this 
volume)  as  well  as  the  strawberry  (Fragaria), 
raspberry  {Rubus),  and  blueberry  (Vaccinium) 
seeds  (Morzowski,  this  volume)  and  the  single 
trichurid  egg  (Reinhard,  this  volume)  recovered 
from  the  deeper  portion  of  level  2  in  this  privy 
suggest  that  this  may  have  been  the  case. 

High  pollen  concentrations  can  reflect  rapidly 
buried  surfaces  in  natural  soil  profiles 
(Dimbleby  1985:  45).  The  zone  1  matrix  may  also 
be  a  small  amount  of  fill  that  was  exposed  to  the 
pollen  rain,  but  protected  from  oxygen  and  fungi 
for  a  period. 

Pollen  zone  2  in  the  Feature  61  profile 
incorporates  samples  3  through  6.  It  is 
characterized  by  blocks  of  lower  pollen 
concentration,  lower  measures  of  pollen 
corrosion,  and  by  pine,  spruce,  hemlock,  oak, 
chestnut,  birch,  hazel,  hickory,  elm,  grass, 
European  cereal,  insect-pollinated  Compositae, 
and  dock  frequencies  that  are  consistently 
distinctive  from  preceding  and  subsequent 
spectra.  The  zone  2  matrix  was  loose  and  loam- 
like in  appearance.  It  seemed  too  light  in  color 
to  be  night-soil.  No  artifacts  were  noted  in  this 
zone  during  sampling.  The  spectra  are  also 
relatively  uniform  when  compared  to  the  fills  of 
feature  27  and  the  northeast  profile  feature  of 
21W/8N.  The  matrix  may  have  been  mixed 
before  deposition  in  the  privy,  suggesting  that  it 
is  an  episodic  fill  originating  off  site. 

Pollen  zone  3  consists  of  a  single  sample  (No. 
7)  sandwiched  between  a  piece  of  honeycombed 
wood,  the  top  of  zone  2,  and  a  large  piece  of  what 
appears  to  be  an  architectural  member  at  the 
bottom  of  level  4  (Figure  12-15).  The  buckthorn, 
elm,  black  locust-type,  and  mint  family 
frequencies  imply  some  mixing  across  this 
interface,  but  the  oak,  chestnut,  hazel,  grass,  and 
insect-pollinated  Compositae,  dock,  "corroded 


oak,"  and  pollen  concentration  figures  more 
strongly  suggest  that  the  zone  3  spectrum  is 
different  from  those  of  both  zone  2  and  zone  4. 
This  may  be  a  matter  of  relative  exposure.  Elm 
counts  expanded  at  the  expense  of  oak  during 
the  late  19th  century  in  the  21W/8N  northwest 
profile.  The  counts  of  these  two  types  in  Feature 
61,  and  perhaps  the  decline  of  grass,  is 
consistent  with  the  documentary  record  (Bond 
1989:  7)  of  privy  discontinuance  ca.  1887-1889. 
Pollen  concentrations  are  not  high  enough  to 
interpret  this  as  a  buried  natural  surface,  but  the 
modest  increase  in  pollen  concentration  and 
improvement  in  pollen  preservation  in  this  zone 
suggests  a  fill  surface  that  accumulated  some 
new  pollen  through  some  exposure  but  was 
protected  from  free  oxygen  and  aerobic  fungi.  It 
may  be  that  the  vault  was  filled  to  ca.  level  7  at 
that  time  and  abandoned  with  its  superstructure 
intact. 

Pollen  zone  4  extends  from  sample  8  through 
sample  12  at  the  top  of  the  profile  at  the  base  of 
the  20th-century  level  3.  The  deteriorated 
remnants  of  a  plank  wall  were  observed 
immediately  behind  (north  of)  the  profile 
location.  Oak,  chestnut,  birch  (Betula),  hazel 
(Corylus),  elm,  buckthorn  (Rhamnus),  grass, 
European  cereal,  goosefoot,  insect-pollinated 
Compositae,  mint  family  (Labitae),  and  dock 
frequencies  all  differ  notably  from  those  of 
pollen  zone  2.  Either  the  flora  in  the  backlot 
changed  markedly  or  the  matrix  originated  at  a 
different  location.  The  latter  seems  most  likely, 
and  the  contrast  between  the  incorporated 
pollen  spectra  and  that  of  zone  2  seems 
sufficiently  comprehensive  to  identify  this 
profile  segment  as  a  separate  episodic  deposit. 
Both  pollen  concentrations  and  quantities  of 
degraded  pollen  are  larger  at  the  top  of  the 
profile,  suggesting  the  "penetration  of  a  fill" 
record  formation  pattern  described  in  the 
introduction.  The  top  of  the  remaining  profile 
may  have  been  exposed  and  unprotected  for  an 
interval  between  the  post-1910  filling  (Bond 
1989:  7)  and  the  post-1918  (see  21N/8W, 
northwest  profile)  deposition  of  the  now-missing 
level  3  matrix.  This  would  date  dismantling  of 
the  privy  superstructure  to  the  second  decade  of 
the  20th  century. 


Summary  and  Conclusion 

Pollen  analysis  of  the  James  (Sirk)  Street 
boardinghouses  backlots  was  undertaken  to  test 
a  hypothesis  suggested  by  pollen  data  recovered 
during  the  initial  (John  Street)  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse  pollen  investigation.  This 
hypothesis    stated    that    a    ragweed    (wind- 


258   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


pollinated  Compositae)  dominated  flora  in  the 
backlot  gave  way  to  grass  during  the  main 
portion  of  the  boardinghouse  occupation  and 
that  the  grass  was  itself  replaced  by  ragweed  in 
the  late  19th  century  as  immigarants  replaced 
native  millworkers  and  boardinghouse 
maintenance  slipped. 

The  technical  objectives  of  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse  backlot  pollen  study  in  testing 
this  hypothesis  were:  (1)  To  define  the  nature 
and  history  of  ground  cover  in  the  backlot;  and 
(2)  to  define  the  function  and  history  of  a 
number  of  archeological  features.  Two  lines  of 
evidence  were  employed:  (1)  pollen  taxa 
frequencies;  and  (2)  pollen  record  formation 
process  data. 

Among  dense  human  populations  in  complex 
societies,  as  in  the  planned  19th-century  city  of 
Lowell,  the  vegetation  is  under  cultural  control. 
The  natural  and  native  have  been  largely 
eliminated,  and  man  is  the  dominate  factor  in 
the  landscape.  Vegetation  is  present  where 
people  want  it  or  where  they  do  not  care.  The 
former  produces  plantings  and  nature 
reservations,  the  latter  weeds.  Both  reflect 
human  selection  with  respect  to  the  particular 
soil  in  which  the  plants  are  rooted.  Pollen  taxa 
frequencies  record  cultural  dynamics  because 
they  register  the  sensitive  response  of  vegetation 
to  cultural  activities  in  such  settings.  Pollen 
record  formation  processes  are  essentially  site 
formation  processes.  There  are  two  aspects  of 
these.  One  of  these  encompasses  natural 
processes  such  as  post-deposition  pollen 
leaching  and  degradation.  These  are  Schiffer's 
(1988:  464)  "N-Transforms."  The  second  aspect 
is  the  human  distortion  of  normal  pollen  taxa 
frequency  patterns  and  of  natural  pollen 
leaching  and  degradation  patterns.  These  are 
Schiffer's  (1988:  464)  "C-Transforms." 

Palynological  C-Transforms  and  N- 
Transforms  both  are  critical  in  the 
interpretation  of  archeological  features  in  the 
boardinghouse  backlot.  Pollen  percentages 
were  very  irregular  through  the  21N/8W 
northeast  feature  sequence,  but  pollen 
concentrations  and  degradation  measures 
indicated  three  profile  development  episodes. 
Natural  leaching  and  degradation  patterns 
define  the  deepest  zone  in  samples  1  through  3. 
Small  quantities  of  reed  and  sedge  pollen 
isolated  among  the  confused  spectra  indicate 
that  this  is  the  somewhat  disturbed  remnant  of 
the  pre-boardinghouse  period  record.  Abrupt 
changes  in  pollen  concentration  and 
preservation  at  samples  4  and  9  indicate  two 
subsequent  episodic  fills  and  suggest  that  each 
of  these  may  have  remained  exposed  for  a  brief 


period  before  being  buried.  Level  3  is  missing  at 
this  locus.  The  dismantling  period  window  glass 
layer  directly  overlay  level  2,  but  no  pollen 
evidence  of  a  former  surface  is  evident  at  the  top 
of  the  profile.  It  is  probable  that  the  northeast 
profile  of  21N/8W  was  truncated  when  the 
boardinghouse  was  torn  down. 

Four  pollen  zones  are  recorded  among  the 
pollen  concentration  and  preservation  data  of 
the  feature  61  privy.  These  appear  to  indicate 
matrix  blocks  of  different  ages.  High  pollen 
concentrations  were  found  in  samples  1  and  2 
just  above  what  appears  to  be  the  plank  vault 
floor.  No  distinctive  counts  of  recognized 
economic  pollen  types  were  noted,  and  the  high 
pollen  concentrations  may  mean  that  the  vault 
stood  open  as  a  wind  or  sheetwash  pollen  trap 
without  accumulating  much  sediment  for  a 
period.  Four  centimeters  is  a  very  thin  layer.  If 
zone  1  reflects  the  normal  vault  contents,  it  is 
only  a  remnant.  Under  any  circumstance,  the 
vault  appears  to  have  been  largely  emptied 
before  abandonment.  The  second  feature  61 
pollen  zone  encompasses  samples  2  through  6. 
Its  spectra  were  quite  uniform,  suggesting  that  it 
may  have  been  homogenized  by  repeated 
handling  before  deposition.  Zone  2  terminated 
under  a  piece  of  rotten  wood.  Zone  3  lay 
between  the  rotten  wood  and  a  number  of 
structural  remnants  thrown  into  the  privy  and 
was  distinguished  by  high  elm  and  low  oak 
pollen  counts.  Its  slightly  higher  pollen 
concentrations  and  better  pollen  preservation 
imply  that  it  is  really  the  top  sample  of  zone  2 
and  that  the  privy  was  filled  to  this  point  and  left 
with  its  superstructure  intact. 

Zone  4  constitutes  a  separate  fill,  and  its 
artifact  content  suggests  that  it  post-dates  1910. 
Level  3  and  probably  some  of  level  2  was 
removed  before  sampling,  but  the  pollen 
concentration  and  preservation  measures  of  the 
zone  4  remnant  in  zone  2  suggest  that  the  top  of 
the  deposit  was  exposed  to  the  atmosphere.  The 
structural  debris  between  samples  7  and  8  may 
mark  the  dismantling  of  the  privy 
superstructure. 

Arboreal  pollen  ratios  of  the  loam  and  root 
mat  potted  plant  remnant  buried  in  the  top  of 
feature  65  were  distinctive  and  suggests  that  the 
soil  originated  off-site.  Pollen  concentration  plus 
elm,  oak,  and  pine  frequencies  correlate  best 
with  upper  part  of  level  2  in  the  21N/8W 
northwest  profile.  If  the  spectrum  is  native  to  the 
backlot,  it  dates  ca.  1890. 

High  pollen  concentrations  and  better 
preservation  at  the  bottom  of  feature  27  suggest 
that  this  hole  was  filled  quite  rapidly.  The  pollen 
taxa  frequencies  imply  something  more.    Plants 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    259 


that  were  prominent  at  the  top  of  the  natural 
backlot  sequence  in  the  21N8W  northwest 
profile  are  best  represented  at  the  bottom  of 
feature  27,  and  those  whose  counts  are  highest  at 
the  bottom  of  that  normal  profile  are  most 
important  toward  the  top  of  the  fill  in  this  pit. 
Such  reversed  stratigraphy  indicates  a  void  that 
was  filled  by  mining  the  backlot.  The  location  of 
the  hole  raises  the  possibility  that  a  tree  or  vine 
was  damaging  the  foundation  and  had  to  be 
removed. 

Both  pollen  taxa  frequencies  and  measures  of 
pollen  record  formation  processes  are  important 
in  defining  ground  cover  history.  Pollen 
concentration  and  preservation  patterns  assure 
us  that  this  is  a  normal  profile  development 
sequence  in  levels  1  and  2,  and,  therefore,  that 
changes  among  the  individual  spectra  probably 
reflect  variation  in  the  local  vegetation.  Declines 
in  both  pollen  content  and  preservation  reflect  a 
change  in  the  function  of  the  backlot  during 
deposition  of  level  3.  Local  weeds  and  boggy 
ground  plants  were  replaced  in  level  1  with 
planted  grass,  which  was  probably  Kirk  Boott's 
lawn.  This  in  turn  gave  way  to  a  utilitarian 
boardinghouse  backlot  which  was  maintained  in 
a  stable,  if  somewhat  barren,  condition  until  the 
late  19th  century.  Elm  and  vine,  possibly  Boston 
ivy,  pollen  frequencies  suggest  the  planting  of 
ornamentals  in  the  vicinity  of  the 
boardinghouses,  while  chestnut,  birch,  and 
hickory  percentages  indicate  the  maturation  of  a 
shade  tree  flora  in  Lowell  as  a  whole.  Parallel 
development  of  shrubby  alley  way  and  yard 
border  flora  is  reflected  in  the  buckthorn  counts. 

In  the  late  19th  century,  letters  of  complaint 
from  the  corporation  agents  to  boardinghouse 
keepers  increased,  suggesting  a  relaxation  of 
standards  both  in  appearance  and  tenant 
behavior  on  the  part  of  the  boardinghouse 
occupants;  quantities  of  trash,  largely  associated 
with  male  immigrants  in  the  workforce,  were 
being  deposited  in  the  previously  well-kept 
backlots  (see  Chapters  6,  7,  8,  9,  and  10).  During 
the  same  interval  the  weed  population,  most 
probably  ragweed,  increased  moderately  in  the 
backlot.  This  slippage  in  maintenance 
standards  may  extend  beyond  the 
boardinghouses  to  the  Boott  Mills  complex  as  a 
whole  because  shallow-water  plants  appear  to 
have  taken  root  in  the  nearby  Eastern  Canal. 
Depressed  pollen  concentrations  and  relatively 


poor  pollen  preservation  in  the  early  20th- 
century  level  3  deposits  record  a  compacted  plot 
with  a  shallowly  churned  surface  stripped  even 
of  most  weeds  by  the  heavy  traffic  through  the 
backlot  after  the  boardinghouses  were 
converted  to  storage  facilities  during  the  last 
years  of  their  existence. 

The  proprietors  of  the  Boott  Mills  Corporation 
were  endowed  with  a  strong  sense  of  propriety. 
They  set  strict  standards  of  behavior  for  all  of 
their  employees  and  appearance  for  all  of  their 
property.  Managers  were  constrained  from 
publicly  engaging  in  politics,  and  laborers  could 
be  discharged  for  loafing  on  street  corners  (Bell 
1987a:  19;  Bond  1989:  5).  Considerable  money  for 
loaming  and  of  sodding  front  and  side  yards  was 
invested  in  the  image  of  the  Kirk  Street  Agents' 
House,  while  the  wrath  of  an  ever-vigilant  mill 
management  fell  frequently  on  litter-bugs  at  the 
boardinghouses  (Robbins  1979:  n.p.;  Bond  1989:  5 
and  Chapter  3,  this  volume).  In  private  these 
criteria  were  not  quite  so  equally  applied. 

The  relatively  uniform  barrenness  of  the 
boardinghouse  backlot  suggested  by  the  pollen 
spectra  deposited  prior  to  the  last  few  years  of 
the  19th  century  supports  the  documentary  and 
archeological  evidence  that  the  Boott  Mills 
management's  pragmatic,  instrumental 
approach  to  employee  housing  was  in  force  for 
the  major  portion  of  the  boardinghouse 
occupation  period.  The  occupants  of  the 
boardinghouses  had  little  control  over  their  own 
immediate  environment,  and  there  was,  until 
quite  late,  little  evidence  for  the  expression  of 
individual  impulses,  even  to  be  messy,  until 
things  got  a  bit  out  of  hand  toward  the  end  of  the 
occupation.  The  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse 
backlots  leave  a  very  impersonal  record. 

In  contrast,  trash  and  organic  garbage 
accumulated  in  the  agent's  house  backlot,  while 
the  soil  supported  weed  floras  that  varied 
markedly  through  time,  recording  modifications 
in  soil  stability  and  fertility  as  the  nature  of 
human  activities  changed  with  the  individual 
whims  of  successive  occupants.  With  a 
landscaped  faqade  to  present  to  the  public,  the 
managers  resident  on  Kirk  Street  were  free  to  do 
as  they  pleased  behind  their  backlot  fence.  The 
record  they  left  in  the  flora  is  more  difficult  to 
interpret,  perhaps  because  it  is  so  personal. 


260   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 

An  Analysis  of  the  Phytoliths  from  the  Boott  Mills  Boardinghouse 

Excavations 

by  William  F.  Fisher 


Introduction 

Opal  phytolith  analysis  has  been  shown  to  be  a 
valuable  tool  in  environmental  reconstruction 
and  the  interpretation  of  archeological  sites. 
Recent  studies  from  historical  sites,  including 
Fisher  and  Kelso  (1987)  and  Piperno  (1987,  1988), 
illustrate  the  utility  of  this  analysis  and  serve  to 
demonstrate  new  techniques  for  understanding 
the  processes  of  deposition.  Phytolith  analysis  is 
not  a  new  technique,  however,  but  because  few 
archeologists  have  recognized  the  value  of 
phytolith  data,  phytolith  type  collections  are 
rare,  and  techniques  for  applying  phytolith 
analysis  to  archeology  are  still  being  developed. 
This  study  draws  on  the  methods  and  techniques 
used  at  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House  (Fisher 
1987b)  while  integrating  new  methods  and 
techniques  suggested  in  the  Kirk  Street  Agents' 
House  report  (Fisher  1987b:  127). 

Opal  phytoliths  are  microscopic  bodies  that 
vary  in  size  from  1-1000  mi.  Phytoliths  are 
formed  in  plants  when  hydrated  silicon  dioxide, 
a  common  constituent  of  ground  water, 
precipitates  out  and  is  deposited  along  cell  walls 
and  intercellular  spaces,  where  it  forms  a  hard, 
durable  opaline  fossil  cast  (Rovner  1983:  226). 
Opal  phytoliths  are  composed  of  a  non- 
crystalline form  of  quartz,  known  as  amorphous 
opal  A,  which  weathers  like  rock  (Jones  and 
Segnit  1971:  58).  Phytoliths  are  produced  in  most 
plants  over  a  variety  of  soil  and  drainage 
conditions.  Production  of  phytoliths  is  usually 
heaviest  in  the  epidermal  tissue  of  the  stems 
and  leaves,  although  they  are  also  produced  in 
root,  flower,  and  fruiting  cells.  Phytoliths  make 
their  way  into  the  soil  when  a  plant  or  plant  parts 
die  and  decompose.  Phytoliths  have  been 
shown  to  be  relatively  stable  components  in  soil, 
susceptible  to  the  same  depositional  and  post- 
depositional  translocation  processes  as  pollen 
but  resisting  other  processes  such  as  percolation 
(Rovner  1986:  23).  Since  phytoliths  are  released 
into  the  soil  as  plants  decay,  rather  than  into  the 
air  like  pollen  grains,  a  large  part  of  the  phytolith 
record  represents  "in  situ  deposition"  (Piperno 
1988:  44).  Phytolith  movement  is  therefore 
usually  the  result  of  mass  movement  of  soil  by 
wind,  water,  or  animals. 

There  are  basically  two  methods  used  in 
phytolith  analysis;  they  are  based  on  differential 
production  and  individual  morphology  of 
phytoliths.   Jones  and  Beavers  (1964:  711)  noted 


that  grasses  contributed  more  opal  to  the  soil 
than  did  trees.  By  extracting  and  weighing 
phytoliths  from  weighed  soil  samples  it  is 
possible  to  determine  the  percentage  of 
phytolith  by  weight  in  the  soil.  The  difference  in 
gross  production  between  grasses  and  trees  can 
then  be  used  in  determining  whether  a  soil  was 
formed  under  grass  or  arboreal  conditions.  This 
method  has  been  shown  to  be  of  great  utility  in 
the  reconstruction  of  the  vegetative  histories  of 
forest  and  grassland  areas  (Witty  and  Knox 
1964;  Wilding  and  Drees  1968;  Verma  and  Rust 
1969;  Miles  and  Singleton  1975;  Fisher  et  al. 
1987). 

The  use  of  this  method  on  archeological 
contexts  must  take  into  consideration  aspects  of 
the  depositional  process  relating  to  human 
behavior  that  studies  of  natural  contexts  do  not 
need  to  consider.  Because  of  the  added  aspect 
of  human  behavior,  differences  in  opal  phytolith 
content  in  archeological  deposits  may  not  be 
related  to  vegetative  patterns  but  rather  to  such 
human  activities  as  garbage  disposal,  latrine 
deposits,  mulching,  fertilizing,  land  fill,  land 
reclamation,  or  charcoal  manufacturing,  to 
name  just  a  few.  The  number  of  variables  that 
affect  phytolith  concentration  in  archeological 
contexts  are  so  numerous  as  to  render  this 
method  nearly  useless  when  applied  as  a  single 
component  of  a  study.  By  comparing  the  data 
gleaned  from  historical  sources,  stratigraphy, 
associated  artifacts,  and,  importantly,  from  soil, 
pollen,  and  macrobotanical  analysis,  it  is 
possible  to  reconstruct  more  accurately  the 
vegetative  histories  and  human  activities  that 
are  indicated  by  the  concentration  of  phytoliths 
in  archeological  deposits  (Fisher  and  Kelso  1987: 
43). 

Since  phytoliths  are  casts  of  plant  cells,  they 
may  be  morphologically  distinct  at  the  family, 
genus,  or  species  level.  By  extracting  phytoliths 
from  plant  specimens  taken  from  identified 
herbarium  collections,  it  is  possible  to  develop  a 
collection  of  phytoliths,  that,  when  compared  by 
morphological  variation,  establishes  diagnostic 
types  identifying  given  plant  families,  genera,  or 
species.  Twiss  et  al.  (1969:  111)  identified 
morphological  differences  in  the  phytoliths  of 
three   groups   of   grasses;    Geis    (1973:    115) 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses     261 


Table  12-2.  Grass  species  occurring  in  Massachusetts  that  produce  Festucoid  (trapezoid)  phytoliths. 

Species 

Bromus  commulatus 
Bromus  mollis 
Bromus  lectorum 
Bromus  ciliatus 
Festuca  rubra 
Festuca  oclaflora 
Poa  compressa 
Poa  pratensis 
Dactylis    glomerata 
Lolium  perenne 
Schizachne  pupurascens 
Distichlis    spicata 
Spartina    pectinata 
Sporobolus  cryptandrus 
Agropyron  repens 
Agropyron  subsecundum 
Agropyron   trachycaulum 
Elymus  canadensis 
Hordeum  jubatum 
Triticum  aestivum 
Avena   saliva 
Hierochloe    odorata 
Phalaris    arundinacea 
Agrostis  scabra 
Calamagrostis    canadensis 
Cinna    latifolia 
Phleum   pratense 
Phragmites  communis 
Egragrostis  cilianensis 
Egragrostis   pectinaceae 
Egragrostis   spectabilis 
Glyceria    borealis 
Danthonia    spicata 
Brachyelytrum   erectum 
Oryzopsis    asperifolia 
Aristida   tuberculosa 


F           C          Pa         Fb 

Description  of  Habitat 

X 

weed  in  waste /fields 

X 

weed  in  waste/ cultivated  sioils 

X 

waste  places/roadsides 

X 

moist  woods/rocky  slopes 

X 

meadows/bogs/marshes 

X 

open  sterile  ground 

X 

open  ground /waste  places 

X 

lawn  grass/woods/meadows 

X 

field/meadow/waste  areas 

X 

lawn/pasture/meadow/ waste 

X 

rocky  woods 

X 

seashores 

X 

fresh  water  marshes 

X 

sandy  open  ground 

X 

meadow/pasture/waste  areas 

X 

moist  meadows/open  fields 

X 

mountain  meadows 

X 

prairies 

X 

meadows  /open  ground/ waste 

X 

cultivar/fields 

X 

cultivated 

X 

bogs/meadows/moist  places 

X 

marshes/river  banks 

X 

mountain  meadows/fields 

X 

marshes/ wet  places 

X 

moist  woods 

X 

cultivar /fields/roadsides 

X                 X 

banks  of  lakes/ streams 

X                3 

( 

cultivated  ground/fields/waste 

X                 J 

( 

fields/open  ground  /waste 

X                3 

( 

sandy  soil 

X 

X 

wet  places /shallow  water 

X 

X                 X 

dry  sterile  rocky  soil 

X 

X 

moist/rocky  woods 

X 

X 

wooded  slopes/dry  banks 

X 

X 

open  sandy  woods 

F  -  Festucoid;  C  -  Chloridoid;  Pa  -  Panicoid;  Po  -  Polylobate  and  Cross-shaped 
Sources:  Brown  1986;  Mulholland  1986;  Hitchcock  1971. 


Table  12-3.  Crass  species  occurring  in  Massachusetts  that  produce  Chloridoid  (saddle)  phytoliths. 

Species  F  C 

Phragmites  communis 

Egragrostis  cilianensis 

Egragrostis   pectinaceae 

Egragrostis   spectabilis 

Bouteloua  gracilis 

Bouteloua  curtipendula 

Cynodon  dactylon 

Leptochloa   fascicularis 


Pa 

Po 

Description  of  Habitat 

X 

X 

banks  of  lakes/ streams 

X 

X 

cultivated  ground/fields/ waste 

X 

X 

fields/open  ground/waste 

X 

X 

sandy  soil 

X 

plains 

X 

plains/prairies/rocky  hili 

X 

open  grassland/ waste 

X 

brackish  marshes 

F  -  Festucoid;  C  -  Chloridoid;  Pa  -  Panicoid;  Po  -  Polylobate  and  Cross-shaped 
Sources:  Brown  1986;  Mulholland  1986;  Hitchcock  1971. 


262   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Table  12-4.  Grass  species  occurring  in  Massachusetts  that  produce  Panicoid  (bilobate)  phytoliths. 


Species 

Danthonia    spicata 
Glyceria    borealis 
Brachyelytrum   erectum 
Oryzopsis    asperifolia 
Aristida   tuberculosa 
Echinochloa   crusgalli 
Panicum  virgatum 
Setaria   lutescens 
Andropogon  gerardi 
Sorghastrum  nutans 
Sorghum   halepense 
Zea  mays 
Zizania    aqualica 
Panicum   capillare 
Digitaria   sanguinalis 
Tridens  flavus 


Pa 

Po 

Description  of  Habitat 

X 

X 

dry  sterile  rocky  soil 

X 

wet  places/shallow  water 

X 

moist/rocky  woods 

X 

wooded  slopes/dry  banks 

X 

open  sandy  woods 

X 

X 

cultivated  fields/waste  places 

X 

X 

prairies /open  ground/ woods 

X 

X 

cultivated  fields/waste  places 

X 

X 

prairies  /open  woods 

X 

X 

prairies  /open  woods 

X 

X 

open  ground/fields 

X 

X 

cultivar 

X 

marsh/stream  banks 

X 

cultivated  fields/waste  places 

X 

fields/gardens/ waste  places 

X 

old  fields/open  woods 

F  -  Festucoid;  C  -  Chloridoid;  Pa  -  Panicoid;  Po  -  Polylobate  and  Cross-shaped 
Sources:  Brown  1986;  Mulholland  1986;  Hitchcock  1971. 

Table  12-5.  Grass  species  occurring  in  Massachusetts  that  produce  Polylobate  and  Cross-shaped  phytoliths. 


Species 

Andropogon  gerardi 
Andropogon  scoparius 
Sorghastrum  nutans 
Sorghum   halepense 
Panicum  virgatum 
Cenchrus  pauciflorus 
Echinochloa    crusgalli 
Setaria   lutescens 
Danthonia    spicata 


Pa  Po  Description  of  Habitat 

x  x  forage  grass/dry  soils 

x  x  prairies /open  woods 

x  x  forage  grass/dry  soils 

x  x  open  ground/waste  areas 

x  x  open  ground/open  woods 

x  x  weed  in  sandy  fields 

x  x  forage  in  field/  waste 

x  x  cultivated  soil /waste 

x  x  dry  sterile  rocky  soil 


F  -  Festucoid;  C  -  Chloridoid;  Pa  -  Panicoid;  Po  -  Polylobate  and  Cross-shaped 
Sources:  Brown  1986;  Mulholland  1986;  Hitchcock  1971. 


separated  36  species  of  trees  and  shrubs  at  the 
family  and  genus  level;  and  Klein  and  Geis  (1978: 
148)  described  the  differences  in  phytoliths  from 
15  taxa  of  the  family  Pinaceae. 

Regional  comparative  collections  are 
necessary  for  identification  of  phytoliths  from 
archeological  sites.  Pearsall  (1982:  868)  and 
Rovner  (1983:  257)  both  suggest  that  the 
development  of  comparative  collections  of  opal 
phytoliths  is  of  primary  concern  as  they  are  an 
integral  part  of  archeological  phytolith  analysis. 
There  are  relatively  few  regional  collections  of 
phytoliths,  however;  they  include  Starna  and 
Kane  (1983),  Piperno  (1984,  1988),  Brown  (1986), 
Mulholland  (1986),  and  Fisher  and  Fisher  (1988). 
These  collections  add  significantly  to  the 
number  of  plants  from  which  phytoliths  can  be 
identified  in  soil  deposits.  The  identification  of 
individual  phytoliths  to  family,  genus,  or  species 
designation  has  been  accomplished  successfully 


at  archeological  sites  (Piperno  1984:  373;  Fisher 
and  Kelso  1987:  41;  Fisher  and  Fisher  1988:  5). 
Phytoliths  have  also  been  used  to  describe 
changing  climate  and  vegetation  (Fisher  et  al. 
1987:  253;  Fisher  and  Kelso  1987:  42;  Lewis  1985: 
45;  1987: 451). 

Morphological  differences  in  phytoliths  found 
in  different  grass  species  are  an  important 
source  of  paleobotanical  information,  as  pollen 
grains  from  nearly  all  grass  species  are 
indistinguishable  from  one  another.  While 
Faegri  and  Iverson  (1964)  and  Kelso  and  Schoss 
(1983)  identify  some  species  of  European 
domesticates  and  corn  pollen  by  size  attributes, 
native  North  American  grasses  tend  to  be 
lumped  into  one  large  category  (see  Kelso  and 
Fisher,  this  volume).  Grass  phytoliths  can  be 
separated  into  a  number  of  different  classes, 
each  containing  a  number  of  tribes  and  genera. 
For  this  study  grass  phytoliths  are  classified  into 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    263 


four  groups:  the  Festucoid,  seen  in  Table  12-2; 
the  Chloridoid  (Table  12-3);  the  Panicoid  (Table 
12-4);  and  the  Polylobate  (Table  12-5)  (Twiss  et 
al.  1969:  111;  Brown  1986:  80). 

The  use  of  opal  phytolith  analysis  in 
conjunction  with  pollen  and  macrobotanical 
analysis  has  been  suggested  by  Pearsall  (1982: 
862),  who  noted  that  "the  technique  [phytolith 
analysis]  is  strongest  when  applied  as  one 
component  of  a  paleoethnobotanical  study." 
Rovner  (1983:  258)  concurs,  suggesting  that  "the 
most  productive  use  of  phytoliths  should  be  in 
conjunction  with  collateral  paleobotanical 
methods."  Rovner  (1983:  258)  also  notes  that 
using  phytolith,  pollen,  and  macrobotanical 
studies  in  concert  "allows  phytolith  data  to  be 
matched  against  both  microbotanical  and 
macrobotanical  remains."  The  environmental 
study  of  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House  and  Boott 
Mills  boardinghouse  backlots  were  not  originally 
designed  with  comparative  analysis  of  pollen, 
phytoliths,  and  macrobotanical  remains  in  mind. 
The  lessons  learned  from  the  Kirk  Street  Agents' 
House  environmental  study  (Fisher  and  Kelso 
1987:  45),  however,  enabled  us  to  formulate  new 
methods  and  techniques  for  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse  backlot  environmental  study 
that  facilitated  the  use  of  the  comparative  data 
generated  by  an  integrated  approach. 


Methods 

Samples  for  opal  phytolith  analysis  were  taken 
from  the  contiguous  pollen  profiles  used  for  the 
pollen  analysis.  Fisher  and  Kelso  (1987:  36) 
recommend  taking  a  phytolith  sample  from 
each  pollen  sample  to  facilitate  comparison  of 
the  data.  Table  12-6  indicates  the  pollen  sample 
number,  the  archeological  level,  and  the 
phytolith  percentages  from  the  northwest  profile 
of  unit  21N/8W.  Table  12-7  gives  the  same 
information  for  the  northeast  profile  of  the  same 
unit.  It  should  be  noted  that  a  number  of 
samples  from  level  1  in  both  profiles  were 
examined  for  phytoliths  but  appeared  to  have 
none,  or  had  too  few  to  count.  One  problem  with 
the  sample  method  used  at  the  boardinghouse 
backlot  was  the  limited  amount  of  soil  for  the 
pollen  and  phytolith  extractions.  It  was  difficult 
to  reextract  if  there  were  problems  with  the 
extraction  method  or  a  need  for  additional 
slides.  A  new  collection  strategy  for  pollen, 
phytolith,  and  soil  samples  is  suggested  (see 
Fisher,  this  chapter,  Part  III)  which  should 
alleviate  this  problem. 


Table  12-6. 

Phytoliths  from  21N/8W  NW  profile. 

Sample  # 

Pa 

C 

F       Po     T      E 

M 

Total 

PSIJ.  1 
PS2, 1.  1 
PS3,  1.1 
PS4J.  1 
PS5, 1.  2 
PS6J.  2 

6 

14 

no  phytoliths 
no  phytoliths 
no  phytoliths 
no  phytoliths 
no  phytoliths 
24     3     16       27 

100 

PS7, 1.  2 

7 

21 

22     3     13       30 

4 

100 

PS8J.  2 

2 

21 

21    11       8       34 

3 

100 

PS9, 1.  2 

5 

21 

17     4       9       42 

2 

100 

PS10, 1.  2 

6 

19 

19     5       9       41 

1 

100 

PS11J.  2 

3 

15 

18     6       7       46 

5 

100 

PS12, 1.  3 

7 

31 

12     2     11       35 

2 

100 

PS13, 1.  3 

not  extracted 

Pa  -  Panicoid;  C 

-  Chloridoid;  F  -  Festucoid;  Po  - 

Polylobate; 

T  -  Trichome;  E-  Elongate;  M 

-Misc. 

Table  12-7. 

Phytoliths  from  21N/8W  NE  profile. 

Sample  # 

Pa 

C 

F       Po     T      E 

M 

Total 

PS1, 1.  1 
PS2, 1.  1 
PS3,  1.1 
PS4J.  2 

15 

27 

no  phytoliths 
no  phytoliths 
no  phytoliths 
7       2       9       39 

1 

100 

PS5, 1.  2 

8 

28 

9       2       4       47 

2 

100 

PS6J.  2 

9 

33 

10     4       8       36 

100 

PS7, 1.  2 

7 

23 

12     6     13       33 

100 

PS8J.  2 

8 

39 

13     4     11       25 

100 

PS9, 1.  2 

16 

31 

9       2       6       36 

100 

PS10, 1.  2 

11 

24 

12     1      13       39 

100 

PS11J.  2 

10 

20 

12     4     14       27 

13 

100 

PS12, 1.  3 

10 

31 

6       3     11       30 

2 

100 

Pa  -  Panicoid;  C 

-  Chloridoid;  F  -  Festucoid;  Po  - 

Polylobate; 

T  -  Trichome;  E-  Elongate;  M 

-  Misc. 

A  weighed  amount  of  soil  between  2-5  grams 
was  analyzed  for  the  percentage  of  opal 
phytoliths  by  weight.  The  procedure  for 
extraction  followed  Mulholland  (1983:  4),  with 
one  exception:  a  solution  of  30%  hydrogen 
peroxide  was  used  to  remove  organic  matter. 
The  final  amounts  of  opal  were  inspected  under 
a  compound  microscope  to  assure  uniform 
purity  and  were  then  weighed  to  determine  the 
soil's  phytolith  content.  The  phytoliths  from 
each  sample  were  mounted  in  cedar  oil  and 
analyzed  under  a  compound  microscope  using 
phase  contrast  for  morphological  characteristics. 
Identification  of  the  phytoliths  were  made 
following  Twiss  et  al.  (1969:  111),  Geis  (1973: 115), 
Klein  and  Geis  (1978: 148),  Mulholland  (1986:  51), 
Brown  (1984:  347),  Piperno  (1988a),  and  Fisher 
and  Fisher  (1988: 11). 

Fisher  and  Kelso  (1987:  40)  proposed  a  method 
of  determining  phytolith  degradation  that  would 
provide  data  on  site  formation.  This  method 
used    phytoliths  that   were  too   corroded   to 


264   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


identify  as  evidence  for  degradation.  This 
technique  was  not  ideal,  as  many  phytoliths  are 
as  yet  unrecognized  and  could  be  included  in 
this  sample.  A  refined  method  was  proposed  for 
the  boardinghouse  backlot  samples. 
Identifiable  phytoliths  were  examined  for 
evidence  of  corrosion  and  degradation,  and  the 
percentage  of  corroded  phytoliths  in  each 
sample  was  then  compared. 

An  important  aspect  of  the  boardinghouse 
backlot  study  and  of  the  phytolith  analysis  in 
particular,  was  the  use  of  the  comparative 
method.  Fisher  and  Kelso  (1987:  45)  note  that 
the  strength  of  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House 
study  was  the  ability  to  compare  and  integrate 
data  generated  from  the  historical  research, 
artifact  study,  pollen  analysis,  macrobotanical 
remains,  and  soil  analysis.  We  have  made  every 
effort  to  try  and  integrate  more  lines  of  data  into 
the  boardinghouse  backlot  study  in  order  to 
build  on  this  strength.  An  important  addition  to 
the  environmental  study  of  the  boardinghouse 
backlot  was  to  have  come  from  the  soil 
chemistry  analysis  of  the  pollen/phytolith 
profiles,  but,  as  noted  above,  insufficient  soil  was 
collected,  hence  no  soil  for  chemical  analysis 
was  "left  over"  from  the  contiguous  profiles.  Soil 
chemistry  analysis  was  therefore  performed 
chiefly  on  samples  that  were  not  directly 
comparable  to  the  contiguous  profiles. 


Results 

The  percentage  of  opal  phytoliths  by  weight  in 
the  samples  is  an  important  measure  that  can 
yield  significant  information  on  the  type  of 
ground  cover,  vegetal  inclusions,  and  other 
depositional  processes.  The  boardinghouse 
backlot  samples  were  weighed  on  a  defective 
scale,  however,  resulting  in  an  error  that  was  not 
discovered  and  corrected  until  after  extraction. 
This  resulted  in  no  reliable  data  on  phytolith 
percentages  for  the  boardinghouse  backlots. 
The  weights  involved  in  phytolith  percentages 
from  2-5  g  soil  samples  are  so  small  that  delicate 
scales  must  be  used,  and  they  must  be 
recalibrated  frequently  by  professionals.  The 
loss  of  data  could  have  been  overcome  if  larger 
soil  samples  for  pollen  and  phytolith  extraction 
had  been  taken,  permitting  reextraction. 

Identification  of  individual  phytoliths  from  the 
Boott  Mills  boardinghouse  backlot  deposits 
provided  some  very  interesting  data. 
Identifications  followed  procedures  used  in  the 
Kirk  Street  Agents'  House  analysis,  with  a  few 
additions.  New  typologies,  by  Piperno  (1988)  and 
Fisher  and  Fisher  (1988)  were  incorporated,  and 
a  new  type  of  grass  phytolith  class  not  evidenced 


or  recognized  in  the  Agents'  House  samples,  the 
polylobate,  was  found.  Tables  12-6  and  12-7 
provide  phytolith  percentages  for  each  phytolith 
sample. 

As  with  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House  analysis, 
it  was  assumed  that  shifts  in  the  frequency  of 
one  of  the  four  main  grass  phytolith  classes  are 
not  substantially  altered  by  grasses  that  produce 
multiple  classes  of  phytoliths  and  instead 
accurately  represent  changes  in  the 
environment  (Fisher  and  Kelso  1987:  41).  Tables 
12-2,  12-3,  12—4,  and  12-5  illustrate  four  classes 
of  phytoliths  produced  by  grasses  and  the 
grasses  that  produce  each  type.  Each  class  of 
grass  phytoliths  has  quite  a  number  of  genera, 
many  of  differing  ecological  niches;  the 
Festucoid  and  Chloridoid  classes,  however,  are 
represented  by  grasses  indicative  of  different 
environmental  conditions.  Twiss  et  al.  (1969: 110) 
suggested  that  in  the  Midwest,  the  Festucoid 
class  represented  the  domestic  grasses,  while 
the  Chloridoid  were  representative  of  the  "short 
grass"  prairie  and  the  Panicoid,  the  "tall  grass" 
prairie. 

These  midwestern  definitions  are  not 
applicable  to  19th-century  Lowell, 
Massachusetts.  It  was  necessary  to  create  a  new 
typology  from  the  midwestern  studies  using  the 
grasses  that  also  appears  in  Massachusetts. 
Tables  12-2,  12-3,  12-4,  and  12-5  show  the 
grasses  found  in  Massachusetts  that  were 
studied  by  Brown  (1986)  and  Mulholland  (1986). 
This  typology  was  suggested  by  Fisher  and  Kelso 
(1987:  41)  to  indicate  that  the  Festucoid  class 
grasses  represent  agriculturally  important 
genera,  forage  grasses,  and  lawn  grasses;  while 
Chloridoid  class  grasses  represent  weed-type 
grasses  that  colonize  waste  areas  and  open 
ground.  There  are  a  number  of  environmental 
conditions  suggested  by  the  presence  of  either 
Festucoid  or  Chloridoid  classes  of  grass 
phytoliths.  Using  the  comparative  method,  it  is 
possible  to  generate  a  more  complete  picture  of 
the  environmental  mosaic  by  integrating  data 
from  the  pollen  and  macrobotanical  analysis 
with  the  phytolith  data. 

The  distribution  of  the  grass  phytolith  classes 
in  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House  deposits  were 
quite  varied  (Fisher  and  Kelso  1987:  42). 
Phytoliths  from  the  boardinghouse  backlot 
indicate  more  homogeneous  deposits.  Table  12- 
6  shows  the  northwest  profile  of  unit  21N/8W, 
and  it  is  interesting  to  note  that  PS6  in  level  2  is 
dominated  by  Festucoid-type  phytoliths, 
indicating  either  a  kept  yard  or  a  pasture-type 
environment.  The  next  five  samples  all  indicate 
a  balance  between  the  Festucoid  and  Chloridoid 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    265 


types.  PS12  in  level  3  then  switches  to  Chloridoid 
dominance  indicative  of  a  weedy  situation. 

It  should  be  noted  that  the  samples  that 
contain  Festucoid  and  Chloridoid  classes  in 
equal  numbers  (PS7 — PS11,  NW  profile)  also 
contain  a  number  of  unusual  phytoliths  grouped 
in  the  miscellaneous  category.  PS7,  PS8,  PS10, 
and  PS11  all  contain  a  phytolith  similar  to  one 
identified  by  Fisher  and  Fisher  (1988:  15)  from 
Hilaria  jamesii,  a  western  fodder  grass.  PS7  and 
PS8  contain  a  phytolith  similar  to  one  identified 
by  Piperno  (1988:  244)  from  Protium  panamense, 
a  Central  American  species.  PS9  contains  a 
phytolith  similar  to  Piperno's  (1988:  233) 
observation  of  Heliconia.  the  boardinghouse 
backlot  phytoliths  that  resemble  phytoliths  from 
other  type  collections  are  not  necessarily 
indicative  of  the  species.  Since  phytolith 
typologies  for  the  Northeast  are  incomplete,  it  is 
quite  possible  that  these  unusual  phytoliths  are 
produced  by  plants  common  or  native  to  the 
Northeast.  The  presence  of  these  miscellaneous 
phytoliths,  and  the  presence  of  Festucoid  and 
Chloridoid  class  phytoliths  in  equal  numbers 
may  indicate  an  unusual  pattern  of  site 
formation.  Activities  such  as  manuring, 
mulching,  or  backyard  trash  disposal  may 
contribute  to  these  patterns. 

The  phytoliths  from  the  northeast  profile  of 
unit  21N/8W  show  similar  homogeneous  strata. 
The  entire  profile  from  PS4  through  PS12, 
however,  is  dominated  by  Chloridoid-type 
phytoliths,  which  is  indicative  of  a  weedy 
situation.  PS11  and  PS12  have  large  inclusions  of 
Curcurbita  phytoliths;  there  are  13  in  PS11  and  9 
in  PS12.  This  certainly  seems  to  indicate  that  the 
upper  part  of  level  2  may  have  been  used  as  a 
discard  area  for  food  remains.  The  presence  of 
squash  phytoliths  in  the  NE  profile  and  their 


absence  in  the  NW  profile  as  well  as  the 
presence  of  phytolith  types  similar  to  Western 
U.S.  grasses  and  Central  American  species  in 
the  NW  profile  and  their  absence  in  the  NW 
profile  point  to  a  similar  site  formation  process. 
Since  phytoliths  are  deposited  "in  situ",  the 
presence  of  such  a  vaired  miscellaneous 
assemblage  indicates  that  the  boardinghouse 
backlots  may  have  been  used  for  episodic  burial 
or  discard  of  garbage  and  refuse.  The  data  are 
also  consistent  witht  the  deposition  of  off-site  fill 
or  the  movement  of  soil  for  landscaping.  Such 
formation  processes  would  cause  quite  a  varied 
background  pattern  in  the  phytolith  record  as 
suggested  in  the  backlot  data.  The  NW  profile 
does  not  contain  as  high  a  percentage  of 
Chloridoid  and  Panicoid  type  grass  phytoliths  as 
the  NE  profile.  The  unusually  high  percentages 
of  Panicoid-type  grass  phytoliths  in  the  northeast 
profile  may  be  accounted  for  by  the  presence  of 
Chloridoid  grasses  that  also  produced  Panicoid- 
type  phytoliths. 

Corrosion  data  for  the  phytoliths  of  both  the 
NW  and  NE  profiles  are  found  in  Table  12-8. 
Both  phytoliths  and  pollen  grains  are  corroded 
by  a  variety  of  agents.  Fisher  and  Kelso  (1987: 
36)  found  that  there  is  a  correlation  between 
phytolith  and  pollen  corrosion  indices.  A  normal 
pollen  corrosion  profile  shows  increased 
corrosion  as  depth  increases.  The  application  of 
an  overburden,  however,  offers  protection  for 
underlying  strata  and  their  pollen  grains,  thus 
creating  an  inverted  corrosion  profile  with  more 
corroded  grains  overlying  protected,  less 
corroded  grains.  Such  inverted  corrosion 
profiles  are  common  in  areas  where  fill  or  refuse 
has  been  spread  over  a  developing  surface  area. 


Table  12-8.  Percentage  of  corroded  phytoliths  from  21N/8W  NW  and  NE  profiles. 


21N/8WNW  Profile 

Sample  # 

%  Corroded 

PS1 
PS2 

no  sample 
no  sample 

PS3 
PS4 
PS5 
PS6 

no  sample 

no  sample 

no  sample 

19.0 

PS7 

12.0 

PS8 

17.0 

PS9 

20.0 

PS10 

20.0 

PS11 

21.0 

PS12 

23.0 

PS13 

no  sample 

21N/8W  NE  Profile 


%  Corroded 

no  sample 

no  sample 

no  sample 

34.0 

43.0 

34.0 

31.0 

35.0 

31.0 

20.0 

27.0 

26.0 


266   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


The  corrosion  data  for  the  backlot  NW  and 
NE  profiles  are  representative  of  an  active  fill 
and  disturbance  sequence.  The  corroison 
percentages  for  the  two  profiles  are  slightly 
different.  The  NW  profile  shows  a  fairly  even 
level  of  corrosion  throughout  the  entire  profile. 
There  is  a  possible  fill  episode  indicated  in  PS7- 
8.  The  NE  profile  indicates  a  possible  fill  level  at 
PS4-5,  with  a  developed  living  surface  on  PS5, 
and  another  possible  fill  episode  at  PS10-11.  It  is 
interesting  to  note  that  the  NEA  profile,  which 
was  dominated  by  Chloridoid-type  grass 
phytoliths  representative  of  weed  grasses,  has  a 
more  varied  corrosion  profile  consistent  with  a 
disturbed  site  caused  by  alternating  episodes  of 
filling  and  dumping. 


Conclusion 

Data  recovered  by  the  phytolith  analysis  of  the 
Boott  Mills  boardinghouse  backlot  has  provided 
insight  into  the  botanical  communities  of  the 
backlot  and  its  depositional  processes.  The  two 
profiles  seem  to  differ  in  both  the  composition  of 
the  botanical  communities  and  their  site 
formation  processes.  The  NW  profile  is 
characterized  by  a  Chloridoid/Festucoid  mix  of 
grasses  with  a  fairly  consistent  percentage  of 
corroded  phytoliths.  This  combination  would 
seem  to  indicate  a  stable  environment  with 
enduring  site  formation  processes.  The  NE 
profile  is  characterized  by  grasses  producing  the 
Chloridoid-type  phytoliths  and  a  rather  variable 


percentage  of  corroded  phytoliths.  This 
combination  would  seem  to  indicate  a  rapidly 
changing  soil  surface  caused  by  episodic  fills 
inducing  a  vegetative  cover  of  disturbed  site 
plants  such  as  the  weed/waste  area  grasses  that 
produce  Chloridoid-type  phytoliths. 

Phytoliths  in  the  miscellaneous  category, 
however,  such  as  squash  and  the  two  types  that 
resemble  phytoliths  from  Central  American 
plants  tend  to  support  a  similar  interpretation 
for  both  profiles.  Because  the  inclusion  of  these 
phytoliths  indicates  a  pattern  of  refuse 
deposition  and/or  fill  episodes,  and  since 
phytoliths  represent  "in  situ"  deposits,  these  two 
seemingly  different  profiles  may  be  the  product 
of  large-scale  fill  episodes  with  great  variation 
within  the  fill  matrix.  The  apparent  differences 
in  vegetation  and  corrosion  may  by  caused  by 
shovel  loads  from  opposite  ends  of  a  large  fill 
load  or  a  number  of  small  fill  episodes  covering 
a  large  area. 

Because  of  the  nature  of  the  phytolith  data,  it 
is  necessary  to  compare  these  results  closely 
with  the  data  gleaned  from  the  pollen,  historical, 
and  archeological  record.  While  the  phytolith 
data  may  not  fully  explain  either  the  vegetative 
or  depositional  records  of  the  backlot,  the  data 
are  valuable  in  supporting  and  substantiating 
evidence  unearthed  by  other  paleobotanical, 
archeological,  and  historical  methods. 


An  Analysis  of  Soils  from  the  Boott  Mills  Boardinghouse  Backlots 

by  William  F.  Fisher 


Introduction 

Soil  analysis  is  an  important  component  of  an 
archeological  investigation.  Archeologists  have 
shown  increasing  interest  in  the  development  of 
soil  analysis  and  a  growing  understanding  of  its 
utility  in  archeological  investigations  (Cornwall 
1958;  Cook  and  Heizer  1965;  Butzer  1971,  1982; 
Limbrey  1975;  Shackley  1975;  Hassan  1978;  Stein 
1985).  Archeologists  are  particularly  interested 
in  soils  because  "it  is  from  the  soil  that  people 
derive  their  nourishment  and  it  is  in,  under,  and 
on  it  that  their  remains  are  found"  (Limbrey 
1975:  ii).  Limbrey  (1975:  233)  also  notes  that 
"intrinsic  information  is  held  in  the  materials  of 
the  soil  itself,  and  in  its  distribution  in  the 
landscape,"  for  soil  is  not  just  a  repository  for 
artifacts,  but  rather  a  fabric  woven  of  cultural 


artifacts,  floral  and  faunal  remains,  and  organic 
and  inorganic  matter. 

Soil  analysis  is  a  broad  description  of  a 
number  of  different  techniques  and  processes  of 
soil  classification,  chemical  and  physical 
analysis,  and  interpretation.  Soils  are  generally 
classified  using  a  guide  to  soil  taxonomy  such  as 
those  produced  by  Soil  Survey  Staff  (1975)  or  by 
Buol,  Hole,  and  McCracken  (1973).  These  are 
systems  for  classifying  naturally  occurring  soils 
and  soil  systems.  Archeological  soils  are  usually 
heavily  modified  by  man;  as  Singer  and  Munns 
(1987:  3)  succinctly  note,  "people  have  a 
profound  influence  on  soils."  These  human- 
altered  soils,  however,  are  not  well  addressed  in 
soil  taxonomy  classifications. 

Chemical  and  physical  properties  of  soils  are 
important  aspects  of  soil  analysis.    Singer  and 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses  267 


Munns  (1987:  1)  suggest  that  soils  are  "dynamic 
ecological  systems  and  to  properly  understand  a 
system  it  is  necessary  to  first  understand  the 
components."  Soil  scientists  Jackson  (1958), 
Black  (1965),  Greenland  and  Hayes  (1981),  and 
Page  (1982)  have  developed  quite  an  array  of 
physical  and  chemical  analyses  used  in  a 
number  of  different  fields.  Some  scholars  (e.g., 
Cornwall  1958;  Shackley  1975;  Limbrey  1975),  for 
example,  have  noted  important  physical  and 
chemical  analyses  that  yield  significant  data 
about  human  occupation  and  the  effect  of 
human  activity  on  soil  properties.  Soil  science 
and  archeology  are  not  stagnant  fields,  and  new 
techniques  and  analyses  are  continually  added 
to  standard  practice  in  order  to  obtain  the  most 
from  the  available  data. 

The  purpose  of  the  soil  analysis  performed  for 
the  Lowell  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House 
(Mrozowski  1987b:  116)  was  to  provide 
information  on  rapid  depositional  episodes, 
depositional  processes,  and  stratigraphic 
interpretation  of  these  deposits.  The  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse  soil  analysis  initially  was 
designed  with  similar  goals.  Other  analyses  were 
planned  after  soil  sampling  was  completed; 
these,  it  was  hoped,  would  provide  additional 
information  about  human  activities,  particularly 
waste  disposal,  as  well  as  data  complementary  to 
the  pollen  and  phytolith  data.  A  further  goal  of 
the  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse  soil  analysis  was 
to  facilitate  comparison  of  soil,  pollen,  phytolith, 
and  macrobotanical  data. 


Methods 

The  sampling  strategy  at  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse  excavations  was  similar  to  the 
strategy  used  in  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House 
excavations  (Mrozowski  1987b:  116).  Sampling 
was  limited  to  the  collection  of  soil  samples  from 
each  stratigraphic  layer  in  each  of  the  two 
operations  and  the  collection  of  soil  samples 
from  selected  features  (i.e.,  from  those  that 
contained  soil — features  such  as  brick  and  stone 
foundation  segments,  for  instance,  did  not).  The 
bulk  soil  samples  were  taken  for  macrobotanical 
analysis,  and  only  after  the  fact  were  the  samples 
subdivided  for  soils  analysis.  A  total  of  19  soil 
samples  were  processed  and  analyzed  by  the 
Soil  and  Plant  Testing  Laboratory  of  the 
University  of  Massachusetts,  Waltham, 
Massachusetts.  The  soils  were  analyzed  for 
available  nutrient  levels  of  phosphorus  (P), 
potassium  (K),  calcium  (Ca),  magnesium  (Mg), 
ammonium  (NH4),  and  nitrate  (N03),  as  well  as 
pH,  aluminum  (Al),  lead  (Pb),  arsenic  (As),  and 


cadmium  (Cd)  levels.  Also  analyzed  were  the 
micronutrient  levels  of  boron  (B),  molybdenum 
(Mo),  zinc  (Zn),  copper  (Cu),  iron  (Fe),  and 
manganese  (Mn).  Total  phosphate  was 
estimated  using  the  procedure  outlined  by 
Shackley  (1975:  68)  and  Cornwall  (1958: 175).  The 
results  are  presented  in  Appendix  D.  Additional 
tests  had  been  planned  for  estimating  total 
organic  matter  and  total  silica  of  the  pollen  and 
phytolith  soil  samples  (collected  separately  from 
selected  locations  in  the  backlots  by  Kelso),  but 
insufficient  soil  remained  after  the  pollen  and 
phytolith  extraction  had  been  completed. 

Two  critical  errors  in  the  sampling  procedures 
limited  both  the  utility  of  the  samples  and  the 
sample  quality.  In  our  analysis  of  the  Kirk  Street 
Agents'  House  soils  we  discovered  that  for  good 
comparative  data  we  needed  matching  pollen 
and  phytolith  profiles  as  well  as  soil  and 
macrobotanical  samples  taken  in  conjunction 
with  the  pollen  and  phytolith  samples  (Fisher 
and  Kelso  1987).  Sadly,  we  realized  the  need  for 
a  change  in  sampling  strategy  after  the  samples 
from  the  Boott  boardinghouse  backlots  had 
been  taken  and  the  excavation  closed.  We  now 
know  that  it  is  very  important  to  have 
comparative  soil  samples  from  the  pollen  and 
phytolith  profile,  not  just  isolated  soil  samples 
from  stratigraphic  layers  and  selected  features. 
That  is,  all  our  sampling  should  have  been  done 
in  continuous  columns  as  was  done  for  the 
pollen  and  phytolith  samples  so  that  all  samples 
are  directly  comparable. 

Relationships  between  plant  communities  and 
soil  conditions  are  an  important  facet  of  modern 
botany  and  involve  an  understanding  of  both 
plants  and  soil  (Pritchett  and  Fisher  1987:  35). 
The  reconstruction  of  historical  plant 
communities  and  soil  conditions  is  only  possible 
with  comparative  pollen,  phytolith, 
macrobotanical,  and  soil  analysis.  In  addition, 
many  soil  conditions  (e.g.,  pH  and  organic 
content)  affect  pollen,  macrobotanical,  and 
phytolith  preservation  and  degradation  and 
therefore  the  cultural  interpretation  of  these 
analyses.  It  is  also  possible  that  once 
comparative  sampling  is  instituted,  many  new 
relationships  may  be  discovered  among  the 
various  elements  of  the  soil  mosaic. 

Pollen  sampling  as  done  by  Kelso  (this 
volume)  consists  of  a  contiguous  column  of 
samples  taken  every  2  cm.  this  sample  is  large 
enough  for  phytolith  analysis  to  be  performed  on 
the  same  samples.  We  have  discovered, 
however,  that  while  one  of  two  pollen  cores  or 
profiles  per  site  can  provide  sufficient  data  for 
the  palynologist,  phytoliths,  because  they  are 
decay-in-place  residue,  are  better  analyzed  with 


268   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


a  contiguous  profile  from  each  excavation  unit. 
We  also  have  discovered  that  soil  analysis  of  the 
pollen  and  phytolith  profiles  will  enhance  our 
data  and  provide  additional  comparative  data. 
In  order  to  accommodate  these  newly- 
recognized  needs,  we  are  recommending  a  new 
sampling  strategy  for  environmental  analysis. 

We  suggest  saving  a  20  cm  x  20  cm  baulk  in 
the  corner  of  each  l-m^  unit  under 
investigation.  Removing  the  baulk  in  2-cm 
levels  will  yield  a  volume  of  800  ml  for  each 
sample,  which  should  be  sufficient  for  pollen, 
phytolith,  and  soil  analysis.  Removing  20%  of 
each  unit  for  environmental  analysis  may  sound 
rather  extreme  at  first;  the  evidence  provided  by 
the  pollen,  phytolith,  and  soil  analysis  should  be 
equated  with  the  evidence  provided  by  metal, 
glass,  or  ceramic  analysis.  Artifacts  found  in  the 
column  sample  may  be  recovered  at  no  risk  to 
the  environmental  analyses.  It  should  be  noted 
that  the  environmental  data  can  usually  provide 
details  on  micro-changes  within  excavated 
stratigraphic  layers  through  use  of  the  finer 
sampling  interval. 

An  error  in  recovering  and  storing  the  soil 
samples  was  discovered  after  analysis  of  soils 
from  boardinghouse  backlots  was  complete.  Soil 
samples  were  taken  in  the  field  and  placed  in 
air-tight  plastic  bags.  Samples  remained  in 
these  bags  for  many  months  before  analysis. 
This  error  came  about  because  soils  analysis  was 
a  late-comer  to  the  boardinghouse  research;  in 
the  case  of  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House, 
advance  planning  permitted  soil  samples  to  be 
air-dried  after  recovery,  per  instructions  from 
the  soils  laboratory.  Cornwall  (1958:  117)  warns 
that  "close  sealing  [of  soil  samples]  should  be 
avoided,  especially  of  moist  material  .  .  . 
polythenne  bags  are  ideal  once  the  sample  has 
been  dried."  He  further  notes  that  "unless  the 
samples  can  be  dealt  with  immediately, 
moisture  will  encourage  the  growth  of  algae  or 
moulds"  (Cornwall  1958:  117).  The  growth  of 
algae  and  molds  indicates  continued  biological 
action  in  the  sample  that  alters  the  levels  of 
organic  nutrients.  Since  each  sample  is  isolated 
within  its  own  micro-environment  and  contains 
an  unknown  amount  o(  moisture,  the  biological 
reactions  occur  differentially,  sample  by  sample, 
so  that  quantitative  results  are  skewed  and 
qualitative  comparisons  can  be  meaningless. 
Simply  drying  the  soil  samples  in  a  low- 
temperature  oven  and  then  resealing  them 
would  have  prevented  the  loss  of  valuable  soil 
data. 

We  know  now  that  this  type  of  error  could 
have  been  avoided  if  we  had  included  a 
professional  soil  scientist  or  archeological  soil 


expert  on  our  project  team,  but  this  was  one  of 
the  few  cases  in  which  we  sent  samples  out  to 
persons  otherwise  wholly  uninvolved  with  the 
project.  This  is  not  to  say  that  the  Soil  and  Plant 
Testing  Laboratory  was  at  fault — quite  the 
contrary.  They  were  in  fact  very  helpful  in 
isolating  our  possible  errors  and  in  the 
interpretation  of  results;  the  critical  error  was  in 
not  having  a  soil  scientist  create  and  perform  the 
sampling  strategy.  Unfortunately,  like  many 
other  archeologists,  we  naively  assumed  we 
could  stockpile  soil  samples  safely  in  plastic 
bags  indefinitely.  Historical  archeologists  have 
little  or  no  training  in  soil  science,  so  those  who 
determine  and  perform  soil  sampling  strategies 
are  destined  to  make  mistakes  that  a  trained 
pedologist  would  avoid.  As  Griffith  and  Mark 
(1979:  118)  note,  common  errors  by  archeologists 
include  rediscovering  basic  soil  principles  rather 
than  forming  theories,  misapplying  soil 
techniques,  and  misusing,  misinforming,  and 
misinterpreting  outside  consultants.  We  hope 
that  future  excavations  make  use  of  the  lessons 
we  learned  at  Lowell:  soil  experts  should  be 
called  in  during  the  early  stages  of  a  project  and 
soil  sampling  should  be  performed  in 
conjunction  with  pollen,  phytolith,  and 
macrobotanical  sampling  so  that  the  analyses 
can  complement  and  supplement  one  another. 
Further,  the  analyses  must  be  done  promptly 
after  sample  recovery  if  the  samples  cannot  be 
prepared  for  long-term  storage. 


Results 

Because  of  the  sampling  problems  discussed 
above,  interpretations  of  data  from  the  soil 
analysis  are  more  abbreviated  than  anticipated. 
Intriguing  results  were  nevertheless  evident. 
Levels  of  lead  (Pb),  iron  (Fe),  copper  (Cu), 
arsenic  (As),  and  cadmium  (Cd)  are  reported  in 
parts  per  million  (ppm)  and  appear  in  Tables  12- 
9  through  12-12,  grouped  by  provenance  and 
feature  type.  Total  phosphorus  content  is 
included  in  the  same  tables  but  appears  in 
qualitative  form. 

Lead  levels  were  very  high  in  the 
boardinghouse  backlot  soils.  Lead  is  toxic  to 
humans;  levels  above  300  ppm  total  lead  may  be 
harmful  to  children.  The  Suffolk  County, 
Massachusetts,  Cooperative  Extension  Service 
considers  lead  levels  between  10-30  ppm  to  be 
natural  background  levels.  They  warn  that  lead 
levels  in  soil  and  dust  that  exceed  500-1,000  ppm 
appear  to  increase  children's  blood  lead  above 
background  levels.  Levels  of  lead  from  homes  of 
lead-poisoned  children  in  Boston  average  1,800 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses  269 


ppm  and  range  from  200—4,500  ppm.  Lead  may 
work  its  way  into  the  soil  as  lead  paint  and  lead 
pipes  decay,  from  nearby  roads  (car  exhaust), 
and  from  residue  of  chemicals  used  in  spraying 
orchards.  Lead  levels  were  low  at  the 
boardinghouses  in  fill  and  yard  deposits  (Table 
12-9),  extraordinarily  high  in  drainage  features, 
especially  Features  36  and  37 A  (Table  12-10),  low 
in  possible  planting  holes  (except  Feature  27, 
which  was  very  high;  see  Table  12-11),  and  high 
in  some  levels  of  the  privies  (Table  12-12).  Nine 
out  of  19  samples  from  the  boardinghouse 
backlots  had  lead  levels  of  over  300  ppm,  six  of 
which  were  over  900  ppm.  In  comparison,  in  the 
Agents'  House  samples,  three  of  17  samples  had 
lead  levels  about  300  ppm,  the  highest  being  431 
ppm.  This  may  result  from  a  bias  in  the  samples, 
as  no  privies  or  drainage  features  were  found  at 
the  Agents'  House. 


Table  12-9. 
and  B  and  the 

Stratigraphic  levels  from 
i  ppm  of  selected  elements. 

Opera 

tions  A 

Context 
Operation  A 

4N/6W2 
2N/8W3 

Pb*     Fe 

20       266 
20       344 

Cu 

0.5 
0.7 

As 

0.0 
0.0 

Cd 

0.0 
0.0 

Total  P+ 

Low 
Med 

Operation  B 

25N/2W1 
23N/8W2 

46       239 
74         10 

1.4 

1.3 

0.0 
0.0 

0.0 
0.1 

Low 
Med 

"Lead  is  given  in  estimated  total  ppm. 

"'Total  phosphorus  is  given  in  relative  measure. 


Table  12-10.  Drainage  features  and  the  ppm  of  selected 
elements. 


Context 

Pb* 

Fe 

Cu 

As 

Cd 

Total  P* 

Feature  36 

1513 

11.4 

6.2 

0.0 

0.1 

Low 

Feature  37A 

1328 

68.0 

6.6 

0.0 

0.2 

Low 

Feature  44 

Level  B 

507 

20.5 

3.6 

0.0 

0.0 

Low 

Level  C 

584 

34.9 

5.8 

0.0 

0.0 

Low 

Base 

614 

7.6 

1.2 

0.0 

0.0 

Low 

"Lead  is  given  in  estimated  total  ppm. 

"■Total  phosphorus  is  given  in  relative  measure. 


We  feel  safe  in  eliminating  car  exhaust  as  a 
major  contributor  to  the  boardinghouse  backlot 
lead  contamination.  While  the  site  has 
operated  for  many  years  as  a  parking  lot,  thus 
possibly  exposing  it  to  high  levels  of  exhaust,  the 
blacktop  seems  to  have  shielded  the  site.  If  car 
exhaust  were  a  major  factor,  the  upper  fill  and 
yard    deposits    would    show    higher    lead 


concentrations;  there  would  not  be  differential 
accumulation  in  certain  features.  The 
concentration  of  lead  in  drainage  features 
indicates  that  lead  pipes  and  lead  paint  may  be 
the  most  likely  sources  of  the  lead 
contamination  in  the  boardinghouse  backlots. 


Table  12-11.    Possible 

planting  holes  and  the  ppm  of 

selected  elements 

Context 

Pb* 

Fe       Cu       As 

Cd     ' 

Total  Pi- 

Feature  27 

938 

141      10.1       0.0 

0.0 

Low 

Feature  65 

Level  A 

246 

193        0.4       0.0 

0.0 

Low 

Level  B 

20 

347        0.7       0.0 

0.0 

Med 

Level  C 

20 

277        0.6       0.0 

0.0 

Med 

Level  D 

20 

224        0.8       0.0 

0.0 

Med 

*Lead  is  given  in 

estimated  total  ppm. 

"*Total  phosphorus  is  given  in  relative  measure. 

Table  12-12.  Privies  and  the  ppm  of  selected  elements. 

Context 

Pb* 

Fe       Cu       As 

Cd 

Total  P+ 

Feature  45 

Chmbrpot 

1650 

44.5      7.6       0.0 

0.4 

Low 

Level  B 

955 

35.5      3.9       0.0 

0.0 

Low 

Level  C 

272 

5.5      0.7       0.0 

0.0 

High 

Feature  61 

Level  2 

1358 

4.2     10.1       0.3 

0.3 

High 

Bottom 

46 

372.0      3.1       0.0 

0.0 

High 

'Lead  is  given  in 

estimated  total  ppm. 

"^Total  phosphorus  is  given  in  relative  measure. 

The  relationship  between  iron  and  lead  is  very 
interesting.  In  possible  planting  holes,  fill,  and 
yard  deposits,  where  lead  was  low,  iron  was 
highest  (Tables  12-9,  12-11).  Where  lead  was 
high — in  privies  and  drainage  features — iron 
was  lowest  (Tables  12-10,  12-12).  It  is  unclear 
why  this  relationship  should  exist,  but  it  should 
be  noted  for  further  research.  Iron  has  little 
effect  on  human  health,  although  iron  deficiency 
in  plants  causes  reduced  growth.  Iron  is  a 
naturally  occurring  mineral,  and  its  presence  in 
higher  quantities  in  certain  contexts  may 
indicate  relatively  undisturbed  or  sterile  soils. 

Concentrations  of  copper  in  the  backlot  soils 
mirror  lead  levels;  this  suggests  that  they  share 
the  same  source.  It  is  impossible,  however,  to 
tell  if  the  source  was  lead  paint  as  opposed  to 
lead  pipes,  as  copper  is  a  common  component  of 
each.  Arsenic  is  a  toxin  to  both  plants  and 
humans;  it  is  included  with  cadmium,  copper, 


270   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


lead,  and  zinc  as  toxic  pollutants  subject  to 
regulation  under  the  Clean  Water  Act.  Lindsay 
(1979:  273)  notes  that  the  National  Academy  of 
Sciences  and  the  National  Academy  of 
Engineering  consider  levels  of  arsenic  greater 
than  10  ppm  to  be  toxic  to  plants.  Arsenic  is 
present  in  only  a  few  samples,  including  one 
privy  deposit  (see  Table  12-12).  Arsenic  is  a 
normal  component  of  soils  at  a  very  low 
background  level;  the  levels  found  in  the 
boardinghouse  backlots  are  within  this  range. 
Cadmium  is  rare  in  soils;  most  (ca.  90%)  have 
less  than  0.2  ppm.  High  levels  of  cadmium  are 
noted  in  two  privy  samples,  one  of  which  also 
showed  arsenic.  The  cadmium  levels  found  in 
the  boardinghouse  backlot  soils,  however,  are 
also  within  normal  background  ranges. 

Total  phosphorus  reported  includes  both  the 
organic  phosphorus  and  the  inorganic 
phosphates  present  in  archeological  deposits. 
The  redistribution  of  phosphate  in  archeological 
contexts  is  brought  about  by  movements  of 
animals  or  their  refuse,  concentration  of  human 
rubbish  and  excreta,  and  the  burial  of  corpses 
(Limbrey  1975:  72).  Griffith  and  Mark  (1979:  119) 
note  that  while  many  researchers  have  shown 
that  phosphorus  levels  are  increased  by  human 
activities,  few  have  applied  this  technique  as  a 
tool  for  understanding  either  human  activities  or 
site  development.  There  are  many  patterns 
indicated  in  the  total  phosphorus  content  of  the 
boardinghouse  soils.  Phosphorus  is  higher  in 
lower  levels  in  the  yard  and  fill  deposits  (cf .  Table 
12-9).  This  may  indicate  that  the  lower  levels 
were  living  surfaces  that  saw  the  inclusion  of 
animal  waste  or  human  rubbish,  while  the  upper 
levels  may  represent  more  sterile  overburden  or 
fill  added  during  the  destruction  and  reshaping 
of  the  boardinghouse  backlot.  Phosphorus 
levels  are  uniformly  low  in  the  drainage  features 
(Table  12-10)  and  mixed  in  possible  planting 
holes  (Table  12-11).  The  phosphorus  is  highest 
in  the  lowest  levels  of  the  privies,  indicating  the 
possibility  of  intact  latrine  deposits  in  both 


Features  45  and  61 .  It  is  interesting  to  note  the 
low  phosphorus  counts  at  the  level  the 
chamberpot  was  found  and  in  the  soil  from  the 
chamberpot.  This  indicates  that  the 
chamberpot  was  most  probably  part  of  a  fill 
episode  rather  than  deposited  when  the  privy 
was  in  use  as  a  latrine. 


Conclusions 

The  results  of  the  soils  analysis  of  the  Boott 
Mills  boardinghouse  backlots  provided 
significant  data  on  features,  especially  the 
privies,  as  well  as  information  on  site  deposition 
and  development.  The  high  lead  levels  in 
boardinghouse  backlots  soils  are  relevant  to 
health  issues  concerning  the  boarders  and  their 
children.  Given  the  high  number  of  children's 
toys,  such  as  marbles,  etc.,  found  in  the  backlot, 
it  is  probable  that  children  played  in  them, 
thereby  dramatically  increasing  their  intake  of 
lead.  The  significant  differences  in  lead  content 
between  the  boardinghouse  backlot  and  the 
agent's  house  indicates  a  difference  in  building 
materials  and  upkeep  that  reflects  social 
conditions  of  the  time,  the  presence  of  high 
phosphate  levels  in  the  lowest  levels  of  the 
privies  indicates  some  deposits  escaped 
mandated  cleaning  and  removal. 

Important  lessons  learned,  or  relearned,  by 
the  soil  analysis,  include  the  need  for  a  soil 
scientist  or  pedologist  to  be  included  from  the 
earliest  planning  stages  of  a  project  to  conduct 
sampling,  analysis,  and  interpretation,  and  the 
importance  of  soil  analysis  in  the  overall 
environmental  analysis  of  the  site.  A  new 
sampling  method  is  proposed  that  would 
facilitate  the  comparison  of  soil,  pollen, 
phytolith,  and  macrobotanical  data.  This 
sampling  strategy  is  important  because  it  allows 
for  development  of  new  relationships  and  a 
greater  understanding  of  the  variables  that 
comprise  the  soil  mosaic. 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    271 


Parasitological  Analyses  of  Latrine  Soils  from  the  Boott  Mills 
Boardinghouse  Site,  Lowell,  Massachusetts 

by  Karl  J.  Reinhard 


Introduction 

Biological  analysis  of  latrine  soils  is  becoming 
a  common  aspect  of  archeological  research  (e.g., 
Mrozowski  1983,  1984).  The  last  few  years  have 
seen  the  innovation  of  techniques  and  advances 
in  interpretation  with  respect  to  parasitological 
analysis  of  latrines  (Jones  1985;  Herrmann  1986, 
1987;  Reinhard,  Mrozowski,  and  Orloski  1986; 
Reinhard  et  al.  1988).  Of  specific  application  to 
archeological  remains,  Jones  1985  used  trichurid 
(whipworm)  egg  counts  as  a  means  of 
differentiating  soils  derived  from  fecal  deposits 
from  those  derived  from  trash  mounds 
contaminated  with  feces. 

Soil  samples  from  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse  site  were  submitted  for 
parasitological  analysis.  The  goals  of  this 
analysis  were  the  determination  of  the  nature  of 
the  deposits  (either  fecal,  fecal/trash,  or  trash) 
and  the  identification  of  parasite  species,  if 
possible.  Determination  of  the  nature  of  the 
deposit  is  based  on  the  criteria  established  by 
Jones  (1985). 


Materials  and  Methods 

Five  samples  were  submitted  for  analysis. 
Four  came  from  possible  latrine  deposits  (nos. 
53,  57,  69,  and  70).  The  fifth  was  recovered  from 
the  inside  of  a  chamber  pot  (Feature  45). 

The  soil  samples  were  processed  through 
several  parasitological  techniques  following 
Reinhard  et  al.  1988.  Extensive  pretesting  was 
designed  to  evaluate  which  technique  was  most 
effective  for  parasitological  analysis.  As  a 
preliminary  test,  samples  were  floated  for  5 
minutes  in  sodium  chloride.  The  samples  were 
first  screened  through  a  200-mi  mesh  screen.  In 
this  case  a  portion  of  each  sample  was  placed  in 
a  2-dram  shell  vial,  and  the  flotation  medium  of 
sodium  chloride  (specific  gravity  1.2)  was  added. 
A  microscope  cover  glass  was  placed  on  top  of 
the  vial  in  contact  with  the  top  of  the  flotation 
medium  and  left  for  5  minutes.  Then  the 
microscope  slide  was  examined  for  the  presence 
of  parasite  eggs. 

A  second  test  was  done  using  a  zinc  chloride 
flotation  medium  (specific  gravity  1.9).  In  this 
test,  a  screened  sample  of  soil  was  put  in  a  50-ml 
centrifuge  tube  and  centrifuged  for  30  min  at 
1900  rpm  in  a  standard  clinical  centrifuge.   After 


this  process,  the  supernatant  was  poured  off,  and 
microscopic  debris  was  concentrated  from  the 
solution  and  examined. 

As  a  final  test,  50  ml  of  screened  soil  were 
placed  in  a  70%  solution  of  hydrofluoric  acid  for 
24  hours.  The  resulting  sediments  were  then 
concentrated  by  centrifugation.  The  sediments 
were  floated  in  a  zinc  bromide  flotation  medium 
(specific  gravity  1.9).  The  supernatant 
containing  floating  microscopic  debris  was 
removed  and  concentrated  by  centrifugation. 
Then  the  debris  was  washed  in  water  and 
dehydrated  through  an  alcohol  series.  The 
resulting  microscopic  residue  was  subsampled 
for  microscopic  examination. 

A  second  stage  of  the  analysis  was  designed 
for  quantification.  Thirty  milliliters  of  soil  were 
taken  from  each  sample,  and  a  Lycopodium 
spore  tablet  containing  approximately  11,200 
spores  was  added.  By  comparing  the  number  of 
recovered  parasite  eggs  w'th  the  known  number 
of  spores,  the  number  of  parasite  eggs  per  gram 
of  soil  can  be  determined.  These  subsamples 
were  then  weighed,  screened,  and  treated  with 
hydrochloric  acid  to  break  up  carbonates.  After 
several  water  washes  to  remove  residual 
hydrochloric  acid,  the  samples  were  placed  in 
70%  hydrofluoric  acid  for  24  hours  to  dissolve 
silicates.  After  this  time,  the  samples  were 
concentrated  by  centrifugation  and  then  floated 
in  zinc  bromide  as  noted  above. 

A  second  process  was  attempted.  In  this  case, 
soil  samples  were  measured  out  and  rehydrated 
in  trisodium  phosphate.  They  were  then 
sedimented  by  gravity  in  acetic  formalin  alcohol. 
The  upper  layers  of  sediment  were  examined  for 
parasite  remains.  Thus,  the  quantification 
techniques  included  examination  both  of  floated 
and  sedimented  debris  as  suggested  by  several 
authors  (see  Reinhard  et  al.  1988  for  a  review  of 
processing  procedures). 

To  further  explore  the  origin  of  the  soils, 
sample  70  was  processed  palynologically,  and  a 
200-grain  pollen  count  was  made.  The  other 
samples  were  scanned  to  subjectively  evaluate 
their  similarity  in  pollen  spectra  to  sample  70. 


Results 

No  technique  resulted  in  the  recovery  of 
parasite  eggs  except  that  involving  both 
hydrofluoric  acid  treatment  and  zinc  bromide 


272    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


flotation.  This  resulted  in  the  recovery  of  four 
parasite  eggs. 

One,  recovered  from  sample  70,  is  a  trichurid 
egg  measuring  24  x  50  mi.  This  places  it  in  the 
size  range  of  Trichuris  trichiura  (the  human- 
specific  whipworm)  or  Trichuris  suis  (the  swine- 
specific  whipworm).  Repeated  examination  of 
the  soil  sample  did  not  reveal  any  more  eggs. 
The  ratio  of  spores  to  eggs  in  this  sample  was 
50:1,  which  indicates  a  presence  of  5  eggs  per 
gram  of  soil. 

Three  eggs  were  recovered  from  sample  53. 
The  Lycopodium  spore-to-egg  ratio  was  88:3, 
which  indicates  a  presence  of  15  eggs  per  gram 
of  soil.  One  egg  is  an  oxyurid  egg  measuring  71  x 
43  mi.  The  size  range  and  morphology  the  the 
eggs  are  consistent  with  that  of  Oxyuris  equi,  the 
pinworm  of  the  horse.  The  other  two  eggs  are 
consistent  morphologically  with  the  genus 
Capillaria.  They  measure  28  x  55  mi  and  18  x  35 
mi,  which  suggests  that  two  species  are 
represented  by  the  eggs.  Capillaria  has  many 
species  in  mammals  and  birds,  and  it  is 
impossible  to  identify  species  on  the  basis  of 
eggs.  The  small  size  of  one  of  the  eggs  is 
indicative  of  an  avian  or  rodent  origin.  Neither 
egg  resembles  the  two  capillarid  species 
sometimes  found  in  humans,  C.  hepatica  and  C. 
philippinensis.  Since  horses  are  not  parasitized 
by  a  capillarid  species,  the  eggs  in  sample  53  are 
derived  from  at  least  two,  and  possibly  three, 
animals.  As  noted  above  the  oxyurid  eggs 
implies  an  equine  origin. 

The  other  samples  contained  no  eggs  at  all. 

In  the  process  of  extracting  parasite  eggs,  no 
seeds  were  observed.  Seeds  are  usually  very 
common  in  latrine  deposits.  The  microscopic 
preparation  of  all  soils  show  that  the  majority  of 
organics  present  in  the  soil  are  charcoal 
fragments. 


were  not  from  a  latrine  deposit.  This  is 
supported  negatively  by  the  sparsity  of  seeds  in 
the  soil  samples  and  positively  by  the  presence 
of  abundant  charcoal.  The  charcoal  is  more 
commonly  associated  with  trash  deposits  or 
hearth  sweepings. 

A  large  amount  of  pollen  is  present  in  sample 
70.  The  vast  majority  of  the  pollen  recovered  is 
wind  pollinated.  Of  the  types  recovered,  only 
Trifolium-type,  Malvaceae,  High-Spine 
Asteracaea,  and  Fabaceae  are  insect  pollinated. 
This  accounts  for  only  5%  of  the  recovered 
pollen,  an  insect  pollinated  percentage  that  is 
normal  for  natural  pollen  rain.  Unidentifiable 
and  unknown  grains  make  up  10%  of  the 
spectrum.  The  remaining  85%  of  the  pollen 
spectrum  is  of  wind-pollinated  types.  This 
indicates  that  the  deposits  are  not  derived  from 
a  fecal  origin. 

An  interesting  aspect  of  this  sample  is  the 
large  amount  of  arboreal  pollen.  Pollen  from 
trees  makes  up  41.5%  of  the  total  pollen 
spectrum.  This  indicates  the  presence  of 
forested  areas  in  the  vicinity  of  the  site.  With 
regard  to  the  non-arboreal  pollen,  those  types 
indicative  of  ground  disturbances  (e.g.,  Cheno 
Am  and  Artemisia)  are  rare.  This  suggests  a 
stable  environment  in  the  area  of  the  site. 

Subjectively,  the  pollen  spectra  of  the  other 
samples  appear  similar  to  those  of  sample  70, 
with  the  exception  of  sample  53.  Sample  53 
appears  to  have  a  greater  representation  of  non- 
arboreal  taxa.  None,  however,  appear  to  have  a 
high  percentage  of  insect-pollinated  taxa  or 
economic  taxa  indicative  of  fecal  deposits.  It 
must  be  emphasized,  however,  that  this  is  a 
subjective  estimate  and  that  a  full  pollen  count 
may  reveal  differences  that  are  not  obvious  to 
superficial  examination  (see  Kelso  and  Fisher, 
this  chapter,  Part  I). 


Discussion 

Jones  (1985)  determined  that  egg  counts 
exceeding  20,000  eggs  per  gram  of  soil  lepg]  may 
be  considered  fecal  in  origin.  Those  containing 
2000-19,999  are  probably  fecal.  Egg  counts  of 
500-1,999  are  probably  rrom  mixed  fecal/trash 
deposits.  Egg  counts  of  between  200  and  500  are 
probably  not  indicative  of  latrine  deposits,  but 
rather  "part  of  the  urban  background  fauna" 
(Jones  1985:  112-113).  Egg  counts  less  that  200 
epg  are  not  significant. 

If  Jones'  study  of  British  soils  can  be  applied  to 
the  Lowell  site,  then  one  concludes  from  the 
study  that  the  soil  samples  submitted  for  study 


Conclusion 

The  soil  samples  do  not  contain  significant 
numbers  of  parasite  eggs,  as  would  be  expected 
in  fecal  soils.  Applying  Jones'  criteria  for  the 
identification  of  soils  of  fecal  origin,  one 
concludes  that  the  boardinghouse  site  soils  are 
not  from  fecal  deposits.  The  pollen  evidence 
supports  this  conclusion  in  the  low  amount  of 
insect-pollinated  and  economic  taxa.  These 
findings,  plus  the  presence  of  large  amounts  of 
charcoal,  suggest  that  that  the  Lowell  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouse  site  soils  are  from  non-fecal  trash 
deposits. 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    273 


Macrofossil  Analysis 


Introduction 


by  Stephen  A. 


Although  previous  analysis  of  plant 
macrofossils  from  the  Boott  Mills 
boardinghouses  and  the  Kirk  Street  Agents' 
House  emphasized  changing  plant  communities 
and  the  overall  evolution  of  the  urban 
landscape,  little  emphasis  was  placed  on  the 
examination  of  foodways.  The  former  were 
stressed  because  the  evidence  spoke  most 
directly  to  those  issues,  with  only  limited 
information  pertaining  to  the  study  of  foodways 
being  garnered  from  either  site.  The  reverse  is 
true  of  the  results  drawn  from  the  most  recent 
analysis  of  samples  collected  from  the  rear  yards 
of  Boott  boardinghouse  units  45  and  48. 
Although  the  macrofossil  sample  is  small,  in  part 
because  of  poor  preservation,  it  contains 
evidence  relating  to  foodways,  boardinghouse 
yard  plant  communities,  and  the  activities  of 
non-human  members  of  the  urban  biotic 
community,  rodents  in  particular.  Another 
characteristic  of  the  results  from  the 
boardinghouse  yards  that  differs  from  those 
obtained  for  the  Agents'  House  site  relates  to 
their  context.  Unlike  the  Agents'  House,  where 
all  samples  were  collected  from  stratigraphic 
levels,  the  majority  of  the  seeds  recovered  from 
the  boardinghouse  yards  are  from  discrete 
features  such  as  privies,  planting  holes,  and  pits 
associated  with  architectural  remains.  The 
association  of  specific  botanical  remains  with 
specific  features  in  some  instances  has  merited, 
in  some  instances,  conjecture  concerning 
possible  systemic  association.  Although 
speculations  of  this  kind  are  offered  cautiously, 
until  the  relationship  between  living  plant 
communities  and  their  death  assemblages  is 
better  understood,  they  can  not  be  discounted. 


Results 

The  results  of  the  botanical  analysis  from  units 
45  and  48  will  be  discussed  separately.  More 
samples  were  processed  from  number  48 
because  a  greater  number  of  samples  were 
collected  from  this  backlot.  This  imbalance  is 
offset  to  a  degree  by  the  results  of  earlier  work 
conducted  in  the  yard  of  unit  number  45 
(Mrozowski  1987c).  A  total  of  24  samples  were 
processed  at  the  University  of  Massachusetts  at 
Boston.    A  froth  flotation  machine  was  used  in 


Mrozowski 

the  processing.  All  samples  were  500  ml.  in 
volume;  50  poppy  seeds  were  added  to  each 
sample  in  order  to  have  some  gauge  of  recovery 
rate.  In  this  instance  recovery  rate  was 
comparable  to  that  calculated  for  samples  from 
the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House,  between  20-70%. 
In  a  number  of  cases  the  seeds  appear  to  be 
modern.  Only  samples  from  sealed  features 
appear  to  be  associated  with  the  boardinghouse 
occupation. 

In  addition  to  the  botanical  remains  recovered 
through  floatation  several  specimans  were 
collected  during  excavation.  In  every  instance 
the  specimens  were  either  large  fruit  pits  or  nut 
fragments.  Some  of  these  are  certainly  modern 
and  therefore  will  not  be  discussed.  There  were, 
however,  a  small  number  which  were  recovered 
from  sealed  contexts  and  appear  to  date  to  the 
latter  stages  of  the  boardinghouse  occupation. 
Only  the  occupation  related  specimens  appear 
in  Table  12-13. 


Operation  A:    Unit  #48 

Of  the  24  soil  samples  processed  from  the 
yards  of  the  boardinghouses,  18  were  collected 
from  Operation  A.  Macrofossils  were  discovered 
in  only  6  of  these  samples — in  soils  from  features 
25,  27,  33,  40,  and  49.  No  botanical  remains  were 
recovered  from  feature  45  (the  boardinghouse 
privy)  during  floatation  although  some  were 
found  during  excavation.  Botanical  remains 
were  recovered  during  excavation  in  Features  24, 
37, 43  and  44. 


Feature  24 

This  small  pit  in  the  rear  of  the  boardinghouse 
backlot  may  have  been  a  post  hole.  The  only 
botanical  remains  recovered  from  this  unit  were 
collected  during  excavation.  The  lone  specimen 
was  a  peach  pit.  It  was  among  several  that  were 
recovered  from  the  yard  of  the  boardinghouse. 


Feature  25 

This  feature  consisted  of  fill  in  a  portion  of  the 
cellar  of  the  boardinghouse  itself.  Samples 
collected  from  this  feature  contained  remains  of 


274   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Table    12-13.       Boott    Mills    Boardinghouse    plant 
macrofossil  analysis  results. 


Sample  # 
NF 
32 
24 
21 


NF 
40 

NF 
NF 
NF 

56 

NF 
70 

NF 

NF 


Provenience 
Feat.  24 
Feat.  25 
Feat.  25 
Feat.  27 


Feat.  37/ 
Level  B 
Feat.  40 


Feat.  43 

Feat.  44/ 
Level  B 
Feat.  45 
Level  B 

Feat.  49 


Feat.  61/ 
Level  1 
Level  2 


21N/8W 
Level  2 

23N/2W 
Level  1 


Mullag 

Chenopodium  album 

Polygonaceae 

Rubus 

Vitis  labrusca 

Vitis  sps. 

Gramineae 

Rumex  acetosella 

Leguminoseae 

Vaccinium  sps. 

Fragaria    virginiana 

Sambucus  canadensis 

Capsicum 

Solanum 

Prunus 

Prunus  persica 

Juglans  nigra 


Fam.  /Gen.  Species 
Prunus  persica 
Nut  fragments*' 
Vitis  labrusca 
Sambucus  canadensis 
Chenopodium  album 
Rubus  sps. 

Prunus  persica 
Vitis  sps. 
Polygonaceae  sps. 
Capsicum  /  Solanum 
Rubus  sps. 
Rumex  acetosella 
Fruit  pit  frags. 
(Prunus  sp.?) 


Nut  frags.* 

Nut  frags.* 
Juglans  nigra 
Polygonaceaea  sps. 
Mullago  sps. 
Gramineae  sps. 

Prunus  persica 
Rubus  sps. 

Fragaria    virginiana 
Vaccinium  sps. 
Polygonaceae  sps. 
Leguminoseae  sps. 

Prunus  persica 

Prunus  persica 

Carpetweed 

Lambsquarter 

Smartweed  family 

Blackberry  /  Raspberry 

Fox  grape 

Grape 

Grass 

Sheep  sorrel 

Pea  family 

Blueberry 

Strawberry 

Elderberry 

Pepper 

Nightshade 

Plum  family 

Peach 

"lack  Walnut 


# 

1 

13 

3 

2 

1 

1 

1 
4 
1 
1 
1 
1 


15 

10 
1 
1 
1 

1 

1 
5 
19 
6 
2 
1 


NF  =  Not  floated. 

*Oak. 

'Shows  evidence  of  rodent  gnawing. 


Fox  Grape  (Vitis  labrusca)  and  rodent-gnawed 
nut  fragments.  This  feature  also  contained  a 
major  proportion  of  the  rodent-gnawed  faunal 
material  from  the  site  as  a  whole.   The  presence 


of  the  bulkhead  entry  to  the  cellar  coupled  with 
rodent-gnawed  floral  and  faunal  materials 
suggests:  1)  that  the  cellars  were  used  as  food 
storage  areas  and  2)  that  stored  food  was  also 
being  eaten  by  rodents. 


Feature  27 

During  the  excavations,  feature  27  was 
tentatively  identified  as  a  planting  hole.  This  was 
a  logical  interpretation  given  the  general 
configuration  of  the  feature,  its  location  along 
the  back  wall  of  the  boardinghouse,  and  the 
unusual  discovery  of  a  nearly  intact  red 
earthenware  flowerpot  within  the  feature.  Soils 
from  both  the  feature  matrix  and  from  the 
flowerpot  were  examined  for  macrobotanical 
remains;  none  were  recovered  from  the  latter, 
however.  Two  separate  samples  from  the 
feature  matrix  did  contain  botanical  remains. 
Among  the  seeds  recovered  were  two  of 
elderberry  (Sambucus  canadensis),  suggesting 
that  the  planting  hole  once  held  an  elderberry 
bush.  Elderberry  is  a  shrub  which  stands  4-10  ft 
in  height  and  normally  favors  moist  soils  (Britton 
and  Brown  1898:  228).  Elderberry  is,  however,  a 
highly  adaptive  plant  which  studies  demonstrate 
can  thrive  in  urban  environments  where  soils  are 
often  low  in  nutrients,  poorly  drained,  and  high 
in  metals  such  as  lead  (Mrozowski  1987d:  67-72). 
Ethnoarcheological  research  in  Boston, 
Massachusetts,  revealed  that  in  the  case  of  at 
least  one  household,  an  elderberry  bush  thrived 
for  more  than  35  years  before  succumbing 
because  of  a  lack  of  sunlight  caused  by  the 
growth  of  an  apple  tree  (Mrozowski  1987d:  153- 
155).  Recently  completed  analysis  of  samples 
collected  from  the  planting  bed  in  which  the 
elderberry  bush  formerly  stood  found  that  seeds 
of  the  plant  were  still  present  in  the  soils 
although  the  tree  died  some  15  years  ago. 

The  planting  bed  soils  of  this  modern 
household  are  relatively  rich  in  nutrients 
because  of  long-term  composting.  These 
conditions  may  have  contributed  to  the 
preservation  of  the  elderberry  seeds,  although 
some  seeds,  chenopodiaceae,  for  example  are 
known  to  survive  in  the  ground  for  close  to  a 
century  and  possibly  longer  (Kaplan  and  Mania 
1977:  40-53).  Since  the  boardinghouse  deposits 
in  question  appear  to  date  to  the  latter  stages  of 
the  19th  century,  can  the  possibility  be 
entertained  that  the  botanical  remains  are 
evidence  that  an  elderberry  bush  formerly  stood 
in  Feature  27?  This  is  difficult  to  say  with  any 
clarity  because  pollen  analysis  (see  Kelso  this 
volume)  points  to  a  feature  matrix  characterized 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    275 


by  reverse  stratigraphy,  not  surprising  given  the 
general  nature  of  urban  deposits.  The  presence 
of  other  late  19th-century  artifacts,  buttons  in 
particular  (see  Ziesing  this  volume)  indicates 
that  we  are  clearly  dealing  with  redeposited  fill, 
comprised  of  soils  that  do  appear  to  have  come 
from  the  yard.  Therefore  while  it  is  possible  that 
the  presence  of  elderberry  seeds  signals  the 
former  use  of  Feature  27  as  a  planting  hole  for 
an  elderberry  bush,  it  is  equally  possible  that 
such  a  bush  could  have  stood  anywhere  in  the 
yard. 


Feature  49 

This  shallow  trench  and  soil  stain  contained  a 
small  sample  of  seeds  including  smartweed, 
grass,  and  carpetweed,  all  of  which  were  in  an 
excellent  state  of  preservation  indicating  they 
are  most  likely  modern  intrusions.  Of  course 
such  an  observation  is  made  in  full  awareness  of 
the  recent  nature  of  all  the  boardinghouse 
materials.  In  this  case  the  difference,  however, 
rests  with  the  state  of  preservation.  No  other 
sample  produced  seeds  that  looked  as  modern 
as  those  recovered  from  this  feature. 


Feature  37 

This  small  brick-lined  feature  appears  to  have 
been  a  drain  box.  A  well  preserved  peach  pit  was 
recovered  from  this  feature  during  excavation. 


Feature  40 

This  small  pit  feature  in  the  yard  produced  4 
grape  seeds  and  number  of  seeds  from  ruderals. 
There  are  questions  concerning  the  weed  seeds, 
however.  Some  appear  to  be  modern  in  origin 
and  may  have  been  deposited  at  the  time  the 
boardinghouses  were  demolished.  The  Vitis 
seeds  appear  to  have  been  deposited  at  an  early 
stage  in  the  life  of  the  yard  based  on  their 
condition. 


Feature  43 

This  feature  contained  8  badly  decomposed 
fragments  of  what  appears  to  be  a  cherry  pit. 
The  identification,  although  tentative,  is  based 
upon  the  texture  of  the  outer  shell  and  size. 


Feature  44 

This  trench  feature  contained  a  number  of  nut 
fragments  which  appear  to  be  either  elm  or  oak 
seeds. 


Feature  45 

One  of  the  more  interesting  discoveries  from  a 
methodological  point  of  view  were  the  nut 
fragments  recovered  from  the  boardinghouse 
privy  during  its  excavation.  What  is  interesting 
is  that  several  samples  were  processed  by 
floatation  and  nothing  was  recovered. 
Parasitological  analysis  of  samples  from  this 
feature  produced  evidence  for  horse  pinworm 
suggesting  the  feature  fill  contains  material  from 
off  the  site. 


Operation  B:    Unit    #45 

Only  three  contexts  were  sampled  from 
Operation  B.  These  were  Feature  61,  unit  45's 
privy,  Feature  65,  and  Feature  67.  No 
macrofossil  remains  were  recovered  from  the 
latter  two  features.  Feature  61,  however,  did 
contain  small  but  important  plant  remains  from 
its  second  level.  Level  1  of  the  feature  fill 
appears  to  be  the  residue  from  the  filling  and 
capping  of  the  privy  at  the  time  it  went  out  of 
use.  The  nature  of  the  sediments  making  up 
level  2  of  the  feature  remain  unclear  even  after 
analysis.  Two  samples  from  this  level  were 
processed  to  determine  the  presence  of  parasite 
ova  (see  Reinhard  this  volume).  Sample  #69 
produced  nothing  while  sample  #70  produced  a 
single  trichurid  egg.  Based  on  Jones'  (1985) 
suggestion  that  egg  counts  of  approximately 
20,000  per  gram  of  soil  should  be  expected  from 
samples  of  fecal  origin,  Reinhard  has  correctly 
concluded  that  the  soils  from  sample  #70  should 
not  be  consider  as  such.  The  presence  of  both 
pollen  (see  Reinhard  this  volume)  and  plant 
macrofossils  (see  Table  12-13)  from  the  same 
sample,  however,  suggests  a  small  percentage  of 
the  soils  may  be  fecal  in  origin.  While  little 
significance  can  be  attached  to  these  results  with 
respect  to  health  conditions  at  the 
boardinghouses,  the  presence  of  a  trichurid  egg 
does  lend  some  small  amount  of  support  for  the 
overall  picture  of  conditions  suggested  by  other 
data. 


Discussion 

As  has  been  the  case  throughout  our  research 
in  Lowell,  the  plant  macrofossil  samples  from 
the  rear  yards  of  the  boardinghouses  have 
proven  to  be  small  and  rather  poorly  preserved. 
Only  in  instances  when  conditions  were 
conducive  to  good  preservation  have  results 
been  promising.  The  overall  results  from  the 
Unit  #48,  the  tenement,    indicate  a  landscape 


276   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


characterized  by  ruderals;  not  an  unexpected 
discovery.  The  presence  of  an  elderberry  bush 
in  the  yard  is  possible,  although  the  evidence  is 
limited.  It  is  supported,  however,  by  the  pollen 
analysis  (Kelso  this  volume).  There  is  good 
correlation  between  pollen  and  macrofossil 
results  with  respect  to  the  potential  presence  of 
Vitis,  grapes  in  the  yard.  The  appearance  of 
pollen  from  what  could  be  Vitis  coupled  with  the 
presence  of  grape  seeds  in  feature  contexts 
raises  the  possibility  that  grapes  were  being 
grown  in  the  yard  of  the  tenement.  Another 
interesting  discovery  was  that  food  storage  in  the 
tenement  cellar  appears  to  have  encouraged 
rodent  activity. 

The  results  from  Unit  #45  are  also  of  limited 
interpretive  value  although  perhaps  more  so 
than  those  from  Unit  #48.  The  sample  from 
feature  61  contains  the  seeds  of  several  plants 
that  were  probably  consumed  by  residents  of  the 
boardinghouse.  The  presence  of  seeds  of 
strawberry,  blueberry,  and  blackberry  in  Feature 
61  and  grape,  peach  and  elderberry  remains 
from  other  contexts  from  both  units  are 
reminiscent  of  previous  results  which  indicated 
that  in  spite  of  their  lack  of  mention  in 
documentary  records  fresh  fruits  were  a  part  of 
the  boardinghouse  diet.  An  obvious  possibility  is 
that  they  were  used  as  pie  filling,  or  they  could 
have  been  eaten  plain,  or  used  in  preserves. 
Perhaps  their  lack  of  notoriety  is  the  result  of  use 
on  a  seasonal  basis. 

The  other  discovery  of  interest  is  the 
leguminoseae  seed  recovered  from  the  same 


sample  as  the  fruit  seeds  noted  above.  The  seed 
appears  to  be  a  green  pea  similar  to  those  used 
today  in  pea  soup.  Its  presence  is  far  from 
startling,  since  hearty  soups  were  regular  entries 
of  boardinghouse  menus. 

Information  relating  to  the  plant  communities 
present  in  the  yard  of  Unit  #45  can  only  be 
gleaned  from  previous  results,  which  indicate 
the  presence  of  nightshade  and  other  ruderals 
(Mrozowski  1987c:  150).  In  this  sense  the  rear 
yard  appears  to  be  similar  to  that  of  Unit  #48; 
this  is  based  solely  on  the  macrobotanical 
analysis,  however,  and,  as  other  results  indicate, 
differences  did  exist. 

Drawing  comparisons  between  the 
boardinghouse  and  tenement  is  difficult 
because  of  the  disparity  in  sample  size.  Taken 
together,  however,  several  conclusions  can  be 
drawn.  The  most  notable  is  the  presence  of  fresh 
fruits  noted  above.  It  is  interesting  to  speculate 
on  the  possiblity  that  grapes  and  elderberry  may 
have  been  grown  in  the  yard  of  the  tenement. 
Such  a  strategy  certainly  would  have  been  in 
keeping  with  the  economizing  behavior  that  has 
been  indicated  by  so  many  of  the  data  collected. 
It  also  suggests  that,  like  the  rear  yard  of  the 
Agents'  House,  the  boardinghouse  lots 
continued  to  be  utilized  for  utilitarian  purposes; 
a  pattern  more  consistent  with  preindustrial, 
urban  household  practices. 


Contextual  Archaeology  at  the  Boardinghouses    277 


Conclusions 


Each  analytical  approach  to  these  backlots 
makes  a  unique  contribution  to  our  knowledge 
of  lifeways  in  the  Boott  Mills  boardinghouses. 
Macrofossils  and  phytoliths  testify  to  the  wide 
variety  of  fruits  in  the  millworker's  diet,  but 
chemical  analysis  indicates  that  they  stood  in 
peril  of  lead  poisoning.  Parasite  data  register  the 
presence  of  domestic  animal  feces  on  the  site, 
while  pollen  site  formation  measures  record 
filling  pattens  and  idiosyncratic  acts  in  backlot 
features.  Macrofossils     and     parasites 

independently  confirm  the  osteological 
evidence  for  the  presence  of  rodents  in  the 
vicinity. 

Our  concerted  effort  has  been,  however,  to 
integrate  these  scientific/technical  studies  in  a 
genuine  cross-disciplinary  investigation  rather 
than  generating  another  example  of  the  clusters 
of  unconnected  multi-disciplinary  reports  that 
appear  as  appendices  under  the  "cross- 
disciplinary"  rubric  at  the  rear  of  archeological 
monographs.  This  involved  frequent 
communication,  sharing  both  of  data  and  ideas 
and  a  willingness  to  modify  or  expand  individual 
studies  to  test  postulates  suggested  by  other 
data  sources.  The  inviting  interpretations  that 
died  at  birth  because  of  this  communication  are 
too  numerous  to  mention.  That  in  itself  was 
beneficial.  Positive  results  were  also  achieved. 
This  is  most  evident  in  the  land-use  data 
provided  by  the  21N/8W  northwest  profile  and 
contemporaneous  deposits. 

Our  projected  palynological  ragweed  to  grass 
to  ragweed  record  of  land  use  was  confirmed  by 
the  pollen  spectra  of  this  profile,  but  must  be 
interpreted  differently  than  originally 
hypothesized.  The  deepest  wind-pollinated 
Compositae  pollen  peak  reflects  pre-Boott 
agricultural  weeds,  but  the  grass  pollen  was 
apparently  derived  from  the  lawn  of  Kirk  Boott' s 
mansion  rather  than  from  the  postulated 
pleasant,  grassy  boardinghouse  backlot.  The 
backlot  surface  during  the  early  and  mid-19th 
century  (the  mill  girl  and  family  eras)  appears  to 
have  supported  a  relatively  limited  groundcover 
of  a  few  weeds  with  some  grass.  The  weed 
populations  expanded  further  at  the  expense  of 
grass  during  the  late  19th  and  early  20th-century 
immigrant  male-dominated  occupation  interval 
as  trash  accumulated  in  what  symbolically 
oriented  archeologists  (Hodder  1986)  might 
perceive  as  a  reflection  of  worker  attitudes 
toward  both  the  corporation  and  its 
housekeeping  policies.  Pollen  concentration 
data  indicate  that  weeds  continued  to  dominate 


the  flora  of  the  early  20th-century  storehouse 
period  but  that  the  number  of  plants  actually 
growing  on  and  around  the  probably  work- 
packed  backlot  decreased  markedly. 

The  phytolith  data  are  differently  distributed 
through  the  profile  because  biological  silica  is 
not  so  readily  moved  by  groundwater  as  pollen 
(Rovner  1986:  23),  but  the  groundcover  sequence 
indicated  by  this  class  of  fossils  is  very  similar  to 
that  suggested  by  pollen.  A  majority  of 
phytoliths  attributable  to  economically 
important  or  lawn  grasses  (Festucoid)  in  the 
deepest  productive  sample  is  replaced  by  an 
equal  mix  of  these  lawn  types  and  weed  grasses 
(Chloridoid)  in  the  early  and  middle 
boardinghouse  occupation  deposits,  and  the 
sequence  is  capped  by  samples  dominated  by 
phytoliths  attributable  to  weedy  taxa. 

A  distribution  of  macrofossils  reflecting  such 
landscape  maintenance  is  also  evident.  Weed 
seeds  were  virtually  absent  from  the  general 
yard  sediments  of  the  main  occupation  period 
but  dominated  the  immediate  pre-dismantling 
deposits  of  the  drains  and  other  water  control 
features  examined  during  the  initial 
boardinghouse  investigation  (Mrozowski  and 
Kelso  1987:  149-150).  The  higher  phosphate 
concentrations  in  the  occupation  period  soils 
compared  to  the  storehouse-era  deposits 
suggest  at  least  some  organic  garbage  disposal 
in  the  backlot,  and  most  of  the  seeds  recovered 
from  the  backlot  proper  were  food  waste 
products.  These  had,  however,  been  placed  in 
features,  implying  acknowledgement  of  the 
corporation's  concern  for  appearances  (cf.  Bond, 
Chapter  3,  this  volume). 

Multiple  data  sources  were  also  applied  to  the 
question  of  corporation  compliance  with  the 
April  1890  Lowell  Board  of  Health  order  to 
remove  all  privies.  Documentary  sources 
suggest  that  the  privies  may  have  gone  out  of 
service  even  before  the  order  was  issued,  while 
the  material  culture  record  implies  that  they 
were  not  filled  until  post-1910  (Bond,  Ziesing, 
this  volume).  Macrofossil,  parasite,  soil 
chemistry,  and  pollen  data  from  feature  61  all 
indicate  that  this  privy,  at  least,  was  emptied  but 
not  thoroughly  cleaned  before  it  was  filled.  Site 
formation  data  in  the  privy  pollen  profile 
indicate  two  filling  episodes.  The  deeper  portion 
of  the  privy  fill,  where  no  artifacts  were 
recovered,  was  inserted  as  a  filling  event 
separate  from  the  post-1910  deposit  recorded  by 
archeology  alone.  The  remnant  vault  contents 
from  the  period  of  active  use  may  not  have  been 


278   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


covered  immediately  but  did  not  remain 
exposed  for  20  years.  Pollen  data  indicate  that 
the  filling  episode  dated  post-1910  probably 
records  the  dismantling  of  the  privy 
superstructure. 

The  Boott  Mills  boardinghouse  project 
demonstrates  that  a  cross-disciplinary  approach 
to  a  given  archeological  problem  serves  to 
bolster  the  confidence  both  of  the  analysts  and 
of  the  readers  in  the  ultimate  interpretation  of 
the  data.  Correlations  among  the  results  of 
archival  research,  excavators'  observations, 
material  culture  analysis,  and 
scientific/technical  studies  of  the  site  matrix  are 
remarkable.  They  permit  an  anthropological 
interpretation  of  living  conditions  in  the 
board inghouses  that  integrates  local,  culturally 
created  environment,  corporate  policy,  and 
occupant  practice  and  attitudes. 


Chapter  13 
DISCUSSION  AND  CONCLUSIONS 


by  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski  and  Mary  C.  Beaudry 


Throughout  the  course  of  our  work  in  Lowell, 
the  interdisciplinary  nature  of  the  research  has 
generated  data  pertaining  to  a  constellation  of 
historical  and  archeological  issues.  In  this  the 
third  and  final  report  planned  for  the  project  we 
have  sought  to  balance  interpretive  concerns 
with  concern  for  substance.  Therefore  much 
effort  has  been  expended  catering  to  detail, 
especially  in  the  analysis  of  material  culture  and 
environmental  data.  To  a  certain  degree  the 
results  of  this  work  can  stand  alone,  with  little 
need  for  further  elaboration.  The  interpretive 
potential  of  these  data  is  enormous,  but 
endeavoring  to  connect  the  various  lines  of 
evidence  to  construct  some  monolithic 
statement  would  be  both  cumbersome  and  ill- 
advised.  First  of  all,  we  have  come  to  appreciate 
the  complexity  of  the  subject  we  seek  to 
understand  and  the  peril  we  face  in  reducing  our 
attempts  at  explanation  and  interpretation  of  it 
to  any  limited  set  of  variables.  In  the  present 
monograph,  we  do  not  expect  to  exhaust  the 
interpretive  avenues  these  data  have  opened  for 
us.  Much  thought  and  consideration  remain  on 
the  horizon,  however.  Our  goals  remain 
interpretive  and  anthropological  with  the  proviso 
that  generalizations  are  best  grounded  in  the 
detailed  description  of  particular  cases  (cf. 
Hodder  1987a:  2;  see  Courbin  1988  for  an 
extended  discussion  of  the  need  for  more 
attention  to  data). 

Here  we  offer  commentary  and  observations 
on  our  work  in  light  of  how  it  pertains  to  a  variety 
of  issues  in  the  study  of  19th-century  industrial 
cities,  working  people,  and  material  culture  from 
an  archeological  point  of  view. 

In  spite  of  the  forethought  put  into  the 
boardinghouse  system,  the  results  of  our  study 
provide  testimony  to  the  endeavors  of  the 
Boott's  workers  to  retain  some  control  over  their 
lives.  It  is  this  evidence  of  boundaries  crossed, 
rules  broken,  and  authority  challenged  that 
brings  Lowell's  past  back  to  life  in  human  terms. 
The  actors  in  this  drama  are  visible;  some  we 
even  know  by  name  (see  Praetzellis  and 
Praetzellis  1989a,  1989b  for  examples  of  what 
they  term  'archaeological  biography'),  and  we 
know  the  conditions  in  which  they  lived.  It  is 
through  an  examination  of  the  conditions  that 
obtained  in  the  boardinghouses  and 
boardinghouse  yards  that   we  can  begin  to 


construct  a  clearer  image  of  how  life  was  lived 
within  the  boardinghouse  system.  Before 
moving  into  a  discussion  of  what  we  have 
learned  about  conditions  in  the  backlots  and 
how  these  changed  over  time,  we  offer  some 
observations  on  the  role  a  site  structural/site 
formation  process  approach  has  to  play  in 
historical  archeology. 


Conditions  in  the  Boardinghouses  and  Then- 
Yards 

Site  Formation  Processes  and  the  Nature  of  the 
Archeological    Record 

For  an  archeologist,  any  cultural 
interpretation,  however  elegant,  is  meaningless 
unless  it  is  based  on  data  collected  from 
controlled  archeological  contexts.  This  is  why  the 
study  of  archeological  formation  processes  has 
become  such  a  central  issue  in  archeology  (see, 
e.g.,  Schiffer  1988)  and  why  looking  at  individual 
cases  in  great  detail  is  so  important.  The 
contextual  analysis  of  the  yard  deposits  from  the 
boardinghouses  also  demonstrates  with  some 
clarity  how  rapidly-occurring  events  can  be 
influential  in  structuring  the  archeological 
record.  Kelso's  work  in  particular  provides  an 
elegant  illustration  of  how  palynology  can  serve 
as  a  sensitive  tool  for  constructing  the  natural 
and  cultural  transforms  discussed  by  Schiffer 
(1972, 1988).  Through  the  examination  and  study 
of  plant  pollen,  Kelso  and  Fisher  have  been  able 
to  chronicle  the  changes  in  flora  of  the 
boardinghouse  yards  and  of  Lowell  in  general. 
The  evidence  from  both  phytolith  and 
macrofossil  analysis  complements  the  pollen 
data  well  enough  to  foster  a  truly 
interdisciplinary  synthesis  concerning  the 
nature  of  the  plant  communities  in  the 
boardinghouse  backlots. 

On  complex  urban  sites  contextual  analysis  is 
often  a  prerequisite  for  any  more  ambitious 
social  examination.  At  both  the  boardinghouses 
and  the  agent's  house  it  has  proved  to  be  the  key 
to  understanding  the  close  ties  between 
archeological  formation  processes  and  human 
behavior.  This  is  especially  true  when  time  is 
added  to  the  equation  through  the  analysis  of 
material  culture.  It  provides  the  temporal 
dimension    so    vital    for    linking    individual 


279 


280    The  Board inghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


depositional  events  with  human  action.  In  the 
urban  context,  where  rapid  events  often  shape 
the  archeological  record,  the  cross-disciplinary 
approach  is  critical.  We  have  become 
increasingly  conscious  of  just  how  critical 
environmental  analyses  geared  toward  the 
understanding  of  formation  processes  are  to  our 
goals  of  delineating  and  understanding  cultural 
and  historical  processes,  be  it  inadvertent 
cultural  acts  leading  to  environmental  change  or 
degradation,  the  developmental  cycle  of 
households,  or  the  material  expression  of  widely- 
held  social  values  or  even  of  small-scale,  self- 
conscious,  individual  expression  of  group 
affiliation  it  terms  of  ethnicity,  subculture,  or 
class. 

Theorists  grappling  with  the  notion  of 
evolutionary  process  have  employed  the 
concept  of  punctuated  equilibrium  to  account 
for  the  fact  that  evolutionary  stability  is 
frequently  interrupted  by  events  that  can  set  a 
species  on  a  new  genetic  course.  In  other  words, 
species  undergo  periods  of  stability,  remaining 
relatively  unchanged  over  long  periods  of  time, 
then  suddenly  experience  a  mutational  spurt — a 
micro-  or  macro-mutation.  Micro-mutations 
interrupt  stasis  but  do  not  produce  new  species; 
macro-mutations  result  in  full-scale  evolutionary 
change  (Lewin  1980:  884;  Poirier  1987:  33).  The 
archeological  record  of  human  action — the 
systemic  context,  as  it  were — records  similar 
sorts  of  events,  not  necessarily  evolutionary  in 
character,  but  having  to  do  with  cultural  and 
social  stability  and  with  change  over  time.  We 
noted  in  our  conclusions  to  the  Kirk  Street 
Agents'  House  study  (Beaudry  and  Mrozowski 
1987b;  see  also  Fisher  and  Kelso  1987)  that  a 
detailed  contextual  approach  with  attention  to 
taphonomic  processes  (especially  of  pollen  and 
phytolith  corrosion  indices)  makes  it  possible  to 
link  both  major  and  minor  perturbations  in  the 
household  cycle  with  the  formation  of  the 
archeological  record. 

We  do  not  hesitate  to  proselytize  on  this 
subject.  Doing     archeology      involves 

understanding  the  archeological  record,  not 
mining  it  for  artifacts.  Historical  archeologists  at 
times  have  difficulty  addressing  through  their 
analyses  of  disparate  artifact  categories  the 
broad  social  and  anthropological  issues  in  which 
they  profess  interest  (cf.  Brown  1987);  this  is 
perhaps  because  they  are  all  too  often  in  far  too 
much  of  a  hurry  to  get  the  dirt  off  of  their 
material  in  order  to  study  it.  The  site  matrix 
comprises  soil  plus  artifacts,  and  it  is  often  the 
soil  that  contains  most  of  the  data — or  from 
which  the  preponderance  of  the  data  can  be 
extracted. 


Kelso  and  Fisher  especially  (see  Chapter  12) 
have  found  they  needed  to  develop  new 
methods  and  procedures  in  order  to  accomplish 
their  aims.  Use  of  pollen  and  phytolith  data 
beyond  environmental  reconstruction  to 
examine  formation  processes  in  detail  requires 
different  extraction  techniques  and  larger  grain 
counts  than  is  usual.  Kelso  and  Fisher  point  out 
that  pollen  from  historical  deposits  may  be  less 
well  preserved  than  that  from  ancient  soils  but  is 
there  nonetheless  (Kelso  and  Fisher,  Chapter  12; 
see  also  Kelso  and  Beaudry  n.d.).  An  extraction 
procedure  that  does  not  acetylize  the  sample 
and  counts  of  a  minimum  of  400  grains  per 
sample  are  necessary  for  good  palynological 
results  from  historical  sites.  Further, 
comparative  samples,  preferably  taken  from 
contiguous  column  profiles  at  2-cm  intervals, 
provide  the  best  means  of  integrating  data 
derived  from  soil  chemistry,  palynology, 
phytolith,  and  floated  macrofossil  remains. 

One  of  the  most  important  purposes  of  this 
form  of  analysis  is  to  unravel  the  complexities  of 
the  archeological  record  itself.  As  was  the  case 
at  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House,  the 
archeological  record  at  the  boardinghouses  has 
been  strongly  influenced  by  short-term  events. 
Feature  61  (the  privy  behind  unit  #45),  for 
example,  was  filled  rapidly  during  the  latter 
stages  of  the  19th  century.  Much  of  the 
contextual  record  speaks  to  the  events  that 
came  into  play  as  the  boardinghouse  system 
began  to  enter  its  twilight.  The  results  indicate 
that  although  refuse  was  disposed  of  in  the 
yards,  the  company's  wishes  that  the  lots  be  kept 
clean  were  generally  adhered  to  for  much  of  the 
19th  century.  Ruderals,  evidenced  by  both 
pollen  and  macrofossils,  appear  to  have  been 
restricted  to  the  borders  of  the  yards  or  perhaps 
sprang  up  in  small  cracks  between  wooden 
planks  thrown  down  to  provide  walkways  through 
what  were  at  times  muddy  backlots  (at  other 
times,  they  would  have  been  dry  and  dusty — and 
an  ersatz  paving  of  any  sort  would  have  also 
helped  to  keep  the  dust  down).  The  presence  of 
weeds  clearly  increased  during  the  waning  years 
of  the  19th  century.  Whether  this  was  the  result 
of  a  growing  ambivalence  on  the  part  of  the 
corporation  or  merely  the  end  of  its  involvement 
remains  unclear.  What  the  data  do  seem  to 
indicate  is  a  period  of  decay  towards  the  end  of 
the  19th  century. 

Weeds  were  not  the  only  plants  that  grew  in 
the  backlots,  however,  as  planting  holes,  ivy  and 
grape  pollen,  and  grape  seeds  attest.  It  is  not 
surprising  to  learn  that  ivy  was  planted  against 
the  back  walls  of  some  of  the  boardinghouses; 
we  have  photographic  evidence  of  this  (Figure 


Conclusions  281 


Figure  13-1.  Stercopticon  view,  ca.  1889,  showing  unidentified  workers  standing  outside 
Boott  housing  in  Amory  Street.  The  Boott  Mills  complex  is  to  the  right;  to  the  left,  the 
end  of  a  boardinghosue  block  can  be  seen.  The  narrow  wooden  structure  with  a  pitched 
roof  is  a  woodshed;  note  the  opening  or  gate  into  the  fenced  backlot  and  ivy  growing  up 
the  rear  wall  of  the  boardinghouse.  (Courtesy  of  the  University  of  Lowell  Special 
Collections  and  the  Lowell  Historical  Society.) 


282    The  Board inghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


13-1).  It  did  come  as  something  of  a  surprise  to 
consider  that  some  boardinghouse  residents 
might  have  had  grape  arbors.  But  this,  too,  is  not 
out  of  place;  it  would  be  far  more  surprising  to 
find  no  evidence  whatever  of  gardening  in  the 
backlots  (cf.  Sam  Bass  Warner's  To  Dwell  is  to 
Garden,  1987). 


Conditions  in  the  Yards 

Conditions  in  the  boardinghouse  yards  can  be 
inferred  from  refuse  disposal  patterns, 
palynological  evidence  and  the  results  of  both 
macrofossil  and  soil  analysis.  In  terms  of 
disposal  patterns,  much  of  the  faunal  material, 
for  example,  was  recovered  from  sealed 
contexts,  such  as  pits,  or  was  associated  with 
enclosed  spaces  such  as  cellars  or  crawlspaces 
beneath  ells.  Deposition  of  sheet  refuse  did  not 
occur  until  the  late  19th  century;  evidence  for 
this  comes  from  ceramics,  glass  bottle 
fragments,  and  clay  pipe  stem  fragments.  Of  35 
ceramic  sherds  with  maker's  marks,  20  were 
identifiable.  Of  these,  two  were  manufactured 
between  1843  and  1867;  all  the  rest  dated  to  after 
1870.  Over  700  machine-made  bottle  fragments 
were  recovered  from  two  Boott  privies  that  were 
excavated,  revealing  both  a  late  date  (ca.  1910) 
for  filling  privies  ordered  out  in  1890  as  well  as 
clandestine  disposal  of  alcoholic  beverage 
containers.  Of  the  marked  clay  pipes  from 
Scotland,  25%  (18)  are  marked  "Glasgow,"  and 
75%  are  marked  "Scotland,"  indicating  a  late 
date  for  much  of  the  material.  By  the  end  of  the 
19th  century,  despite  city-wide  trash  collection, 
the  boardinghouse  yards  were  still  used  for 
refuse  disposal. 

During  the  early  period  of  the  Boott's  history 
the  yards  were  well  maintained,  as  evidenced  by 
relatively  stable  grass  pollen  frequencies.  The 
decline  in  grass  pollen  frequencies  coincides 
with  an  increase  in  ragweed  pollen  as  well  as 
with  the  appearance  of  sheet  refuse.  This 
ground-cover  pattern  is  considerably  different 
than  that  reconstructed  for  the  rear  yard  of  the 
Kirk  Street  Agents'  House  (see  Beaudry  and 
Mrozowski  1987b).  The  rear  yard  of  the  agent's 
house  appears  to  have  served  utilitarian 
purposes — it  was  heavily  trafficked  and  rich  in 
trashy  deposits — while  the  front  and  side  yards 
had  an  ornamental  function  as  an  extension  of 
the  building's  facade.  In  the  rear  yard,  varying 
contributions  of  goosefoot  (Chenopodiaceae), 
ragweed  (Compositae),  and  Aster-type  (insect- 
pollinated  Compositae)  pollen  correlate  with 
stratigraphic  evidence  of  changing  human 
activities.  A  pattern  of  declining  ragweed-type 
weeds  and  increasing  grass  percentages  reflects 


progressive  soil  stabilization  in  what  had  been  an 
active  backlot.  This  pattern  is  the  reverse  of  that 
observed  at  the  boardinghouses,  where  initial 
stabilization  was  followed  by  a  yard  increasingly 
dominated  by  weeds  (Mrozowski  and  Kelso  1987; 
Kelso  1987a,  1989;  Kelso  and  Fisher,  this 
volume).  While  the  conditions  in  the 
boardinghouse  yards  began  changing  during 
the  third  quarter  of  the  19th  century,  when 
corporations  appear  to  have  focused  primary 
attention  on  the  most  public  aspects  of  their 
housing,  full-blown  deterioration  set  in  after  the 
Boott  sold  its  housing  to  a  Boston  slumlord  in  the 
1890s.  It  is  this  decline  that  the  archeological 
record  records  with  unmistakable  clarity 
(Mrozowski  et  al.  1989). 

Not  every  unsanitary  or  unhealthy  aspect  of 
the  boardinghouses  stemmed  from  corporate 
neglect,  however.  Remarkably  high  lead  counts 
in  the  soils  of  the  boardinghouse  backlots  are 
probably  a  by-product  of  the  corporation's 
annual  painting  and  whitewashing  activities.  Soil 
contamination  would  have  posed  a  health 
hazard  to  boardinghouse  residents  nearly  as 
serious  as  that  posed  by  the  contaminated  water 
they  drank  (Mrozowski  et  al.  1989).  Lead 
poisoning  can,  among  other  things,  cause 
psychological  disorders — especially  among 
children  (see,  e.g.,  Needleman  et  al.  1979:  689- 
696;  Yaffe  et  al.  1983:  237-245;  see  also  White 
1973).  It  has  been  assumed  for  some  time  that 
lead  poisoning  results  from  eating  vegetables 
grown  in  lead-contaminated  soils;  there  is  now 
evidence,  however,  that  links  it  more  directly  to 
the  soils  themselves.  Very  often  lead  enters  the 
body  when  people,  gardeners,  for  instance,  who 
work  in  lead-contaminated  soils  fail  to  wash  their 
hands  properly  before  eating  (Schmitt  et  al.  1979: 
1474-1478;  Yaffe  et  al.  1983:  237-245).  Lead  can 
also  enter  through  the  eyes,  however,  which 
means  wind-blown  soils  would  also  present  a 
hazard  (Mrozowski  1987b;  Mrozowski  et  al.  1989). 

Soils  analysis  conducted  at  the  Agents'  House 
site  revealed  that  the  backlot  soils  were  relatively 
low  in  lead  content  (Mrozowski  1987b)  In  all  17 
samples  tested,  figures  for  lead  content  ranged 
from  a  low  of  20  ppm  to  a  high  of  431  ppm.  Soil 
samples  recovered  from  modern  gardens  in 
Boston,  Massachusetts,  by  comparison,  ranged 
from  a  low  of  20  ppm  to  several  with  counts  of 
1250  to  2419  ppm — all  of  which  are  quite  high 
(Mrozowski  1987b:  251-266).  Fisher's  analysis  of 
soils  from  the  boardinghouse  backlots  found 
lead  counts  comparable  to  some  of  those  seen  in 
Boston.  These  figures  are  striking  considering 
that  the  boardinghouse  deposits  have  been 
sealed  and  therefore  unaffected  by  automobile 
exhaust  emissions  while  the  agent's  house  yard 


Conclusions  283 


has  been  open  to  the  air.  What  this  seems  to 
indicate  is  that  the  annual  whitewashing 
campaigns  touted  so  highly  by  the  corporations 
as  evidence  of  proper  upkeep  of  their  housing 
had  the  insidious  and  unexpected  side  effect  of 
contaminating  the  backlot  soils.  Hence  even  the 
good  intentions  of  corporations  striving  to 
maintain  appearances  through  yearly  coats  of 
paint  could  have  contributed  unknown  and 
unsuspected  threats  to  an  environment  already 
rife  with  hazards. 

As  large  a  role  as  the  corporation  played  in  the 
lives  of  its  workers,  there  were  other  forces  that 
were  equally  influential.  The  emergence  of 
middle-class  cultural  values  during  the  19th 
century,  evident  in  the  archeological  and 
documentary  record  of  the  Kirk  Street  Agents' 
House,  is  also  visible  in  the  material  culture  of 
the  boardinghouse  residents.  Through  an 
analysis  of  the  material  world  of  the  mill  workers 
it  is  possible  to  gain  detailed  insight  into  the 
processes  that  contribute  to  the  development  of 
cultural  values  and  how  material  culture  serves 
as  an  active  medium  of  cultural  expression. 


Material  Expressions  of  Culture 

If  there  is  a  common  theme  that  connects  the 
various  interpretations  drawn  from  the  analysis 
of  the  material  record  it  is  how  the  material 
world  is  employed  in  cultural  expression.  The 
relationship  of  behavior  to  the  material  world  is 
far  from  passive.  Cook's  fine  analysis  of  smoking 
equipment  and  leisure  behavior  demonstrates 
how  even  mass-produced  items  such  as  humble 
clay  pipes  can  be  actively  manipulated  as  a 
strategy  for  cultural  expression.  The  same  is 
true  of  Ziesing's  findings  concerning  personal 
items.  She  notes  that  most  of  the  items  of 
jewelry  recovered  from  the  boardinghouses  were 
inexpensive  imitations  of  costlier  items. 
Although  less  imbued  with  conscious 
connotations  of  class  than  short-stemmed  pipes, 
cheap  costume  jewelry  in  imitation  of  "the  real 
thing"  served  the  aspirations  of  those  who 
worked  in  the  factories.  Perhaps  it  is  ironic  that 
so  many  who  spent  hour  upon  hour  laboring  in 
the  mills  producing  fortunes  for  others  would 
leave  such  a  humble  legacy  of  buttons,  glass 
'gems'  and  liquor  bottles.  For  while  the 
archeological  and  documentary  record  provide 
testimony  to  the  power  of  corporate  paternalism 
and  the  boardinghouse  system,  those  same  data 
evoke  expression,  if  not  of  resistance,  of  personal 
aspirations  and  self-expression.  Despite  the  fact 
that  limited  economic  means  placed  genuine 
impediments  in  the  way  of  the  material  wants  of 
Lowell's   mill   workers,  evidence  of  adaptive 


behavior — as  Cook  notes  in  Chapter  11,  of  the 
creation  of  subculture — is  visible.  It  is  visible  in 
the  use  of  medicines  more  desirable  for  their 
alcohol  content  than  their  efficacy  in  curing 
illness.  It  is  also  expressed  in  the  use  of  white 
clay  pipes  as  expressions  of  class  affiliation  and 
even  of  class  pride. 

In  the  end  what  the  results  tell  us  is  that 
culture  is  fluid,  more  a  dialogue  than  a  static  set 
of  rules.  The  boardinghouse  system  was 
constructed  on  a  set  of  cultural  values.  Its 
founders  sought  to  secure  its  permanence  by 
giving  their  vision  expression  in  brick  and 
mortar.  The  overall  success  of  their  attempts  at 
social  control  is  undeniable,  but  the  material 
record  also  reveals  how  workers  found  avenues 
for  expression. 

The  management  policy  of  the  corporations 
involved  paternalism,  but  it  was  a  paternalism 
without  rights.  It  was  in  leisure  behavior  and  off- 
work  time,  as  well  as  personal  dress  and 
comportment,  that  individual  workers  expressed 
themselves  and  signalled  the  affiliations  of 
ethnicity,  subculture,  and  class. 

Quite  intriguing  to  consider  in  this  regard  is 
the  use  of  tea  wares  and  comparatively 
elaborate  table  settings  by  tenement  residents. 
This  contrasts  with  the  patterning  of  the 
boardinghouse  ceramic  assemblage  and  can  be 
linked  to  household  composition — corporate 
versus  nuclear  household — as  well  as  to  cultural 
values.  Recent  work  of  other  historical 
archeologists  provides  us  with  the  means  for 
understanding  the  nature  of  these  differences 
and  the  reasons  for  them.  Wall  (1987)  was  able 
to  demonstrate  through  the  analysis  of  a  series 
of  ceramic  assemblages  from  18th-  and  19th- 
century  New  York  City  that  such  tablewares 
closely  reflect  a  new  set  of  values  that  emerged 
as  urbanization  and  industrialization  took  place 
(see  also  Mrozowski  1988,  who  ties  the 
widespread  values  of  the  19th  century  to 
developments  in  18th-century  American  cities). 
Ceramic  assemblages  from  late  in  the  second 
quarter  of  the  19th  century  tend  to  reflect  a  set  of 
ideals  that  developed  more  or  less  as  a  response 
to  changing  social  conditions  brought  about  by 
industrialization  and  the  emergence  of  the 
middle  class.  Chief  among  these  values  was  the 
notion  of  separation  of  the  home  and  the 
workplace,  with  woman's  sphere  being  at  home 
and  proper  work  for  women  being  running  a 
household  (but  not  necessarily  physically 
engaging  in  housework). 

This  notion  of  striving  for  refinement  and 
middle  class  status  through  adoption  of  middle 
class  standards  for  polite  entertaining  and  social 
display  (cf.  Jean-Louis  Flandrin,   Distinction 


284    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


through  Taste,  1989),  especially  through  tea 
drinking,  is  of  interest  in  that  it  adds  a  dimension 
to  ceramic  analysis  beyond  economic 
considerations.  It  is  obvious  that  ceramics  were 
often  symbols  as  much  as  they  were  everyday 
objects;  historical  archeologists  are  increasingly 
willing  to  interpret  their  ceramic  assemblages  in 
light  of  the  multiple  functions  they  served  in 
order  to  place  their  use  in  its  proper  cultural 
context:  Burley  1989  and  Yentsch  n.d.a  are 
especially  fine  examples  of  such  analyses.  Such 
studies  bring  women  into  focus,  revealing  how, 
especially  in  19th-century  homes,  women 
influenced  the  nature  of  the  household.  An 
example  from  Fort  Independence  in  Boston, 
Massachusetts,  makes  this  clear.  Clements 
(1989)  found  that  critical  differences  occurred 
between  the  ceramic  and  glassware  not  so  much 
in  the  assemblages  of  officers  versus  enlisted 
men  but  between  married  and  bachelor  officers. 
Deposits  from  households  of  married  officers 
had  by  far  the  greater  proportion  of 
serving/entertaining  vessels  (e.g.,  tureens, 
platters,  tea  wares,  etc.).  Both  assemblages  had 
drinking  vessels — stemware  and  tumblers — but 
deposits  from  the  bachelors'  quarters  had 
significantly  more  vessels  related  to  alcohol 
consumption  than  to  tea  and  coffee  drinking  or 
even  to  food  consumption  (probably  because 
bachelor  officers  ate  in  the  mess  hall).  The 
presence  of  women  hence  had  an  unmistakable 
effect  on  the  archeological  record;  the  stabilizing 
influence  of  women  was  not  lost  on  the  U.S. 
Army,  which  encouraged  its  officers  to  marry. 
This  afforded  them  respectability  as  well  as 
stability,  something  the  military  valued  highly  in 
its  early  years  when  it  was  faced  with  public 
opposition  to  a  standing  army  and  fear — 
especially  in  major  urban  centers — of  the 
possible  ill  effects  of  bringing  large  numbers  of 
unattached,  transient  males  into  the  community. 
It  seems  likely  that  the  differences  between 
ceramic  assemblages  at  the  Boott 
boardinghouse  and  tenement  can  similarly  be 
attributed  to  the  differences  in  household 
makeup.  While  women  were  present  and 
perhaps  outnumbered  males  in  both 
households,  married  women  whose  families 
rented  Boott  tenements  could  aspire  to  stable 
family  life  and  could  put  into  practice  the  values 
linked  to  the  domestic  ideology  of  the  19th 
century.  Such  notions  of  domesticity  found 
material  expression  in  manifold  ways,  many  of 
which  are  preserved  or  represented  in  the 
archeological  record,  while  others  can  be 
interred  from  the  documentary  evidence. 


Boardinghouses  and      Domestic  Ideology 

As  Landon  points  out  in  Chapter  4,  the  new 
domestic  ideology,  even  though  it  may  initially 
have  been  an  outgrowth  in  response  to  just  such 
conditions  as  those  in  the  mill  towns,  had  an 
influence  on  boardinghouse  keeping.  Landon 
(Chapter  4)  and  Landon  and  Beaudry  (1988) 
explored  the  ways  in  which  domestic  ideology 
validated  and  legitimated  boardinghouse 
keeping  as  a  profession  for  women.  We  have 
also  noted  elsewhere  (Beaudry  and  Mrozowski 
1988)  that  ready  adoption  of  certain  elements  of 
new  technology  may  have  been  fostered  under 
the  boardinghouse  system,  suggesting  that  shifts 
in  domestic  technology  played  a  large  part  in 
changes  that  took  place  in  the  backlots  of  both 
the  boardinghouses  and  at  the  Kirk  Street 
Agents'  House — especially  after  ells  were  added 
to  these  structures.  The  concept  of  domestic 
technology,  drawn  from  Strasser's  use  of  the 
term  in  her  study  of  American  housework,  Never 
Done:  A  History  of  American  Housework  (1982), 
is  especially  useful  because  it  permits  a 
distinction  among  three  related  concepts: 
domesticity  or  domestic  ideology  as  a  widely- 
held  set  of  values  regarding  women's  roles  and 
the  separation  of  home  and  workplace;  domestic 
economy  as  a  set  of  principles  for  proper 
housekeeping;  and  domestic  technology  as  the 
material  expression  of  the  aforementioned 
principles  and  beliefs. 

It  is  possible  that  the  addition  of  ells  to  the 
rear  of  the  boardinghouse  units  was  part  of 
modernization  and  innovation  that 
characterized  the  new  domestic  technology. 
Hubka  (1984:  125)  points  out  that  the  working  ells 
of  rural  farm  houses 

were  the  pride  of  modern,  efficient  farmers  who 
made  their  ells  a  focal  point  for  agricultural  and 
domestic  improvement.  The  ell  was  a  place  of 
applied  technology  and  contained  the  latest  labor- 
saving  devices.... 

Such  devices  included  the  cookstove  as  well  as 
the  set  kettle  or  boiler.  The  ell  shown  in  Figure 
7-11,  a  Bay  State  Mills  boardinghouse  in 
Lawrence,  Massachusetts,  contains  several  of 
such  appliances,  these  chiefly  designed  for 
doing  laundry. 


Food  and  Health 

Food  and  the  behaviors  associated  with  its 
procurement,  consumption,  and  presentation 
offer  the  archeologist  with  a  wide  range  of 
analytical  and  interpretive  avenues.  At  the 
boardinghouses,  evidence  of  foodways  practices 
has  come  primarily  from  three  sources  of  data: 


Conclusions  285 


faunal,  plant  macrofossil,  and  ceramic  analysis. 
Each  of  the  three  sets  of  data  furnish 
information  on  different  dimensions  of  the 
foodways  system  at  the  boardinghouses.  The 
faunal  analysis,  for  example,  alerts  us  to  the 
important  role  meat  had  in  the  diets  of  the  mill 
workers.  Meats  like  beef,  pork  and  mutton  were 
the  preferred  choices,  in  contrast  to  fish  or  fowl, 
which  are  poorly  represented  in  the  faunal 
assemblage.  The  macrofossil  analysis  indicates 
that  fresh  fruits  were  available  in  the 
boardinghouses.  at  least  on  a  seasonal  basis. 
Perhaps  their  seasonal  availability  is  one  reason 
why  no  mention  of  such  fruits  is  made  in  the 
Lowell  dietaries  published  in  the  late  19th 
century.  It  may  also  be  that  fruits  were  viewed  as 
secondary  in  importance  to  meats  and  other 
foodstuffs  recorded  in  the  dietaries. 

A  further  outcome  of  the  faunal  analysis 
reveals  boardinghouse  keepers'  attempts  to 
economize  in  food  purchase.  This  practice 
accounts  not  only  for  the  character  of  the  faunal 
assemblage  and  the  types  of  meat  cuts  it 
represents,  but  also  for  the  nature  of  much  of  the 
rest  of  the  material  culture  recovered  from  the 
boardinghouse  backlots.  Ceramics,  personal 
items  such  as  jewelry  and  hair  combs,  clay  pipes, 
patent  medicines,  and  beverages  all  were 
purchased  with  an  eye  to  economy — in  some 
cases  the  economy  was  engendered  by  'the 
system'  under  which  boardinghouse  keepers 
could  profit  by  cutting  corners,  on  the  other 
hand,  for  workers  frugality  was  a  necessity.  They 
bought  what  they  could  afford,  and  personal 
choice  was  restricted  by  the  price  range  of  goods. 

The  ceramic  analysis  resulted  in  some  highly 
interesting  findings.  Dutton's  exhaustive 
analysis  using  a  variety  of  techniques  seems  to 
conclude  that  only  minor  differences  separate 
the  assemblages  of  the  boardinghouse  and  the 
tenement.  The  point  of  departure,  a  greater 
concern  for  higher  quality  tea  and  coffee  wares 
among  the  tenement's  inhabitants,  signals  just 
how  subtle  material  expressions  of  distinctions 
can  be.  Even  in  an  instance  such  as  this,  where 
the  separation  is  more  a  product  of 
demographic  makeup  or  household 
composition  than  it  is  of  class,  the  material 
record  has  proved  to  be  a  sensitive  indicator  of 
social  differences.  The  presence  of  tea  wares  is 
probably  in  large  measure  attributable  to  the 
fact  that  families  resided  in  the  tenements  (cf. 
Figures  13-2,  13-3),  while  the  boardinghouse  was 
home  for  single  folk.  At  the  same  time 
entertainment-related  ceramics  like  those 
recovered  from  the  tenement  are  indicative  of 
emerging  middle-class  values  whose  influence 
is  evident  in  other  categories  of  material  culture 


as  well.  Neverthe  less  we  can  also  see  friction  in 
the  area  of  class-based  values;  the  spread  of 
middle-class  mores  among  workers  at  times  met 
with  decided  resistance. 


Class-Based  Notions  of  Fitness  and   Well  Being 

Social  historian  Gareth  Stedman  Jones  (1977), 
in  discussing  studies  of  working-class  popular 
recreation  and  leisure,  notes  that  much  of  the 
information  about  such  behavior  comes  from 
the  writings  of  reformers  and  other  "purveyors  of 
minority  causes,  distasteful  not  only  to  workers 
but  to  the  bulk  of  the  middle  class"  (Jones  1977: 
165),  leaving  "our  knowledge  of  these  ideologies 
and  the  material  situations  which  they 
articulated. ..in. ..an  extremely  primitive  state" 
(Jones  1977:  163).  Research  into  non-work  time 
and  the  different  ways  workers  have  used  it  must 
first  of  all  take  into  consideration  the  primacy  of 
work:  "the  social  relations  within  which  it  is 
carried  on,  in  the  determination  of  class  position 
and  in  the  articulation  of  class  attitudes"  (Jones 
1977:  170).  Jones  points  out  that  worker  attitudes 
toward  leisure  pursuits  were  often  inconsistent, 
and  that  while  working  class  leisure  activities 
often  were  characterized  as  'traditional,' 
traditions  were  far  from  static.  Workers  could 
and  did  'invent'  new  traditions;  it  may  be  that  the 
content  of  popular  recreations  was  not  as 
significant  as  their  existence  in  the  first  place — 
that  the  form  was  fluid  because  workers  were 
willing  to  transform  their  leisure  so  long  as  they 
did  not  have  to  give  it  up. 

Sociologists  have  found  that  notions  of  fitness 
and  well  being  tend  to  be  class  based  and  linked 
to  moral  concerns  (Glassner  1988).  In  our  own 
society,  the  body  has  become  a  status  symbol; 
eating  properly  and  exercising  to  maintain  a 
slim  form  takes  time  and  money.  Middle  and 
upper  class  interviewees  condemn  people  who 
eat  at  fast  food  restaurants,  repeatedly  stating 
the  belief  that  if  only  poor  people  were  informed 
about  what  is  good  for  them,  they  would  change 
their  behavior;  they  also  use  highly  charged 
moralistic  terms  to  describe  eating  behaviors 
(e.g.,  "I  was  bad,"  "I  was  sinful.").  (Restaurants 
play  along  with  this,  giving  desserts  names  like 
"Chocolate  Sin,"  etc.]  In  many  ways  those  who 
keep  fit  see  themselves  as  moral  reformers, 
making  the  world  a  better  place  by  cutting  down 
on  their  cholesterol  consumption. 

Yet  working  class  people,  who  are  constantly 
preached  to  on  this  and  other  topics,  resist  what 
sociologist  Robert  Crawford  has  called  the 
"Horatio  Alger  myth  of  fitness" — the  version  of 
well  being  that  takes  time  and  money  and 
purposeful  effort — to  acquire.    Workers  tend  to 


286   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Figure  13-2.  An  unidentified  Polish  family  pose  on  the  stoop  of  their  Boott  tenement,  ca. 
1912.  (Reproduced  from  Kenngott  1912.) 


Conclusions  287 


IX 
o  fj 


3     ° 


'J 


c   'C 


u 

o 


3  x)  to 
r,    ^    c 

9   "3  UJ 

^  ~  S 

to  o  Z 

C      U    v*- 

•a  .2 


S3  J 

T5  3    £ 

O  O    <5 

a>  cut- 

xj  u   a> 

■3  «    -C 

c  >    *- 

3  o    ^ 


nj 


o   o   a 

g  ~<" 
•a  Cs  <y 

'53  o  "5 

CO  -C    3 

2  GU 

«     SP~ 
I-.      O     J 


g> 


288    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


define  well  being  as  the  freedom  to  do  what  they 
want:  to  be  able-bodied  and  fit  enough  to  stay 
awake  after  the  shift,  whether  to  have  a  beer  with 
the  fellows  or  to  do  nothing  at  all.  Working  class 
leisure  activity  is  thus  often  unstructured  and 
often  counterproductive  in  terms  of  actual 
physical  fitness  but  nevertheless  leads  to  a  sense 
of  personal  well  being.  Perceptions  of  health 
and  well  being  contribute  strongly  to  notions  of 
self-esteem;  people  who  believe  themselves  to 
be  in  good  physical  condition  experience  a  sense 
of  well  being  that  may  bear  little  relation  to  their 
actual  level  of  physical  fitness. 

If  19th-century  worker  leisure  behavior  and 
the  material  culture  associated  with  it  are  seen 
as  class  based,  it  is  likely  that  during  that 
century,  as  in  the  present,  attitudes  about  health 
and  well  being — and  their  material 
expressions — similarly  reflected  class 
distinctions.  Nineteenth-century  writers  were 
often  offended  by  what  seemed  to  them  to  be 
idle  loitering  on  the  part  of  working  class 
people — sitting  on  their  front  steps  in 
shirtsleeves,  smoking  clay  pipes  and  /or  drinking 
in  public,  etc.  (cf.  Cook  1989).  What  is  more, 
reformers  linked  such  public  behaviors  to  issues 
of  morality  and  preached  against  them. 
Knowing  this  and  knowing  that  the  moralistic 
aspect  of  concepts  of  fitness  is  still  with  us,  we 
may  be  able  to  circumvent  the  tendency  to 
represent  the  contradictions  generated  by  class- 
based  perceptions  health  and  well  being  in 
terms  of  a  present-day  "rational  and  moral" 
public  aesthetic  of  fitness. 


Nutrition  and  Food   Preferences 

An  example  can  be  drawn  from  the  study  of 
foodways  at  the  Lowell  boardinghouses. 
Landon's  documentary  research  and 
zooarcheological  analysis  revealed  that  workers 
living  in  corporation  housing  had  a  diet 
dominated  by  fatty  meats  and  foods  high  in 
starch  and  carbohydrates  (Landon  1987,  1989). 
With  the  benefit  of  hindsight  and  20th-century 
knowledge  of  food  chemistry  (not  to  mention 
20th-century  attitudes  toward  nutrition),  we 
could  make  a  case  for  Lowell's  workers  having  a 
poor  and  monotonous  diet.  That  is,  if  we 
considered  only  the  empirical  facts  we  have 
assembled,  we  might  think  ourselves  justified  in 
characterizing  boardinghouse  foodways  as 
inadequate  in  nutrients  and  lacking  in  variety. 

Nowhere  in  the  written  sources,  however,  is 
there  any  indication  that  this  diet  was 
considered  inadequate  or  boring  by  those  who 
consumed  it  (Landon  1987).  Rather,  it  was 
viewed  as  "substantial  and  wholesome. ..neatly 


served,  and  in  sufficient  abundance"  (Miles 
1846:  72).  The  key  seems  to  have  been  quantity: 
workers  were  more  worried  about  getting 
enough  food  than  they  were  with  variety  or  with 
actual  nutritional  content.  Variety  was  not  used 
in  the  modern  sense  of  different  cuisines  or 
cooking  styles;  rather,  variety  referred  to  having 
a  wide  selection  of  items  at  any  given  meal — 
potatoes,  turnips,  peas,  etc.,  all  of  which  may 
have  been  boiled,  as  well  as  meat  dishes, 
breadstuffs,  and  baked  goods  or  sweets.  That 
boiled  foods  often  predominated  in 
boardinghouse  cooking  is  suggested  by  an 
advice  column  published  in  the  July  7,  1889, 
Worcester  Sunday  Telegram  (p.  2)  by  "YOUR 
Friend  and  Well  Wisher" 

Before  engaging  board  make  a  cautious  inspection  of 
the  premises,  and  be  sure  to  sniff  the  odors  which 
prevail  in  the  front  hall  and  are  to  a  certain  extent 
an  index  of  the  character  of  the  house.  There  is  a 
certain  "boiled"  smell  which  is  frequently 
encountered  in  such  places,  and  against  which  I 
warn  you.  In  that  house  the  food  will  all  taste 
alike  and  remind  you  in  a  condensed  form  of  the 
smell  to  which  I  have  alluded. 

Domestic  reformer  Catherine  Beecher 
devoted  an  entire  chapter  of  her  treatise  The 
American  Woman's  Home  (Beecher  and  Stowe 
18691 )  to  the  subject  of  healthful  food,  another  to 
good  cooking.  If  we  interpret  Beecher's  targeted 
areas  of  reform  as  providing  inadvertent  clues  to 
usual  behavior  and  attitudes  (in  a  manner 
similar  to  the  way  court  records,  with  their 
unavoidable  focus  on  aberrant  behavior,  reveal 
the  limits  of  the  socially  acceptable),  we  begin  to 
see  that  food  in  the  boardinghouses  probably 
was  not  unlike  what  Yankee  mills  girls  had  eaten 
at  home  on  the  farm.  Beecher  (Beecher  and 
Stowe  1869:  127-128)  equated  overeating  with 
intemperance. 

It  is  a  much  safer  rule,  to  have  only  one  kind  of 
healthy  food,  for  each  meal,  than  the  too  abundant 
variety  which  is  often  met  at  the  tables  of  almost 
all  classes  in  this  country. 

It  seems  that  the  hearty  appetites  of  farmers  and 
laboring  people  were  shared  by  most  19th- 
century  diners.  It  further  seems  unlikely  that 
mill  workers  were  much  affected  by  attempts  at 
dietary  reform;  thirty  or  so  years  later,  turn-of- 
the-century  reformers  found  immigrant  mill 
households  as  well  as  boardinghouses  had  a  diet 
little  changed  from  that  described  for  early  19th- 
century  workers  (cf.  Atwater  1886;  Byington  1910). 
It  is  also  true  that  satisfaction  with  food  in  the 
boardinghouses   stemmed    in   large   measure 

Harriet  Beecher  Stowe  is  listed  as  co-author  but 
apparently  did  not  contribute  to  the  volume. 


Conclusions  289 


from  the  fact  that  the  food  was  indeed  perceived 
to  be  nutritious  and  healthful. 

Dietary  shifts  over  the  19th  century  stemmed 
more  from  technological  innovations  and  from 
the  side  effects  of  environmental  degradation 
than  from  attitudinal  change.  An  1833  account 
by  a  visitor  to  Lowell  noted  with  approbation  that 
boarders  were  obliged  to  eat  salmon  only  once  a 
week  (Josephson  1949:  68);  at  that  time,  salmon 
were  plentiful  in  the  Merrimack  River,  and  their 
abundance  meant  they  were  cheap  and  readily 
available  (Coburn  1920:  63).  By  1870,  however, 
fish  on  boardinghouse  menus  were  limited  to 
inexpensive  ocean  catches  such  as  cod  and 
haddock  (Atwater  1886;  Singer  1985:  112).  Not 
only  had  the  Merrimack  been  dammed  to 
provide  water  power  for  the  mills — making  it 
impossible  for  the  salmon  to  return  upriver  to 
spawn — the  river  was  polluted  by  the  wastes  of 
rapidly  expanding  industry  and  urban 
population. 

Boardinghouse  keepers,  on  the  other  hand, 
adopted  certain  elements  of  domestic  reform  (or 
at  least  domestic  science)  with  alacrity. 
Technological  innovations  in  food  preparation 
(e.g.,  cooking  stoves  and  ranges)  and  in  food 
storage — canning,  for  instance — were  readily 
accepted  (Landon  1987a,  1989;  Landon  and 
Beaudry  1988).  They  helped  the  keeper 
economize  and  avoid  waste.  Whether  they 
contributed  to  the  health  of  boardinghouse 
inmates  is  another  matter. 


The  Boardinghouse  as  Home 

Despite  improvements  in  domestic 
technology,  however,  the  impression  of 
conditions  in  the  boardinghouses  is  one  of 
overall  technological  backwardness. 
Innovations  were  seldom  introduced  by  the 
corporations,  and  labor-saving  devices  when 
present  were  purchased  or  rented  by  the  keeper. 
For  the  most  part,  sense  of  hominess  was 
created  by  incorporating  into  the  boardinghouse 
setting  a  few  carefully  chosen  icons  of  middle- 
class  domesticity  (Cohen  1986:  269-270).  Primary 
among  these  was  the  parlor  piano,  the  presence 
of  which  was  repeatedly  noted  with  approbation 
by  residents  and  visitors  alike.2  Lucy  Larcom,  in 
her  memoir,  "Among  Lowell  Mill-Girls:  A 
Reminiscence,"  (1881:  212;  reprinted  in  Bryant 
and  Rae  1950:  196-215),  seemed  to  find  it  odd 


2 

For  a  review  of  the  significance  of  the  parlor  in 

nineteenth-century  America,  see  McMurry  (1985:  261- 

280);  on  the  significance  of  parlor  organs  and  pianos,  see 

Ames  (1980). 


that  Charles  Dickens  made  special  note  of  the 
presence  of  pianos  in  some  of  the 
boardinghouses.  An  anonymous  author  noted  in 
an  1886  Boston  Sunday  Globe  article,  "Mill  Life: 
A  Tour  among  the  Spinners  and  Weavers.  How 
They  Work  and  How  They  Live...."  that  he  visited 
a  Lowell  boardinghouse  and  was  received  in  the 
parlor,  "which  was  a  handsomely-furnished 
apartment."  An  illustration  accompanying  the 
article  depicts  a  full-blown  Victorian  parlor, 
complete  with  carpet,  bordered  wallpaper, 
curtains,  framed  prints  on  the  walls,  upholstered 
chairs,  table  with  knick-knacks,  and,  featured 
prominently,  a  piano  (see  also  Center  for  History 
Now,  1985).  Parlors  afforded  space  in  which 
boarders  could  engage  in  vital  social  rituals, 
such  as  receiving  callers,  or,  as  Harriet  Robinson 
put  it  in  her  memoir  of  mill  life,  hold  "parlor 
meetings"  like  the  one  she  recalled  in  support  of 
Mrs.  Bloomer's  notions  of  dress  reform 
(Robinson  1898:  193,  reprinted  in  Bryant  and  Rae 
1950: 184-185). 

The  contemporary  emphasis  placed  upon 
living  spaces  and  on  specific  items  of  material 
culture  that  were  symbols  of  domestic  ideology 
helps  us  to  understand  how  workers  were  able  to 
mediate  the  contradictions  between  ideals  of 
home  and  the  reality  of  their  new  living  situation. 
It  highlights  the  facr  that  an  array  of  shared 
symbols  was  accessible  and  subject  to 
manipulation  by  corporations  and  the  keepers. 
In  effect,  the  monotonous  box-like 
boardinghouse  units  through  the  presence  of 
certain  potent  icons  could  be  transformed,  if  not 
into  the  reality  of  home  or  even  an  imitation  of  it, 
into  a  space  whose  elements  signified  the  ideals 
of  domestic  ideology.  The  icons  were 
metaphors,  parts  drawn  from  a  whole,  permitting 
the  mental  transference  from  true  home  to 
symbolic  home.3 

In  a  1973  study  Richard  Horwitz  explored  the 
cultural  symbolism  of  boardinghouses  among 
workers  through  an  analysis  of  primaiy  texts 
about  boardinghouse  life  and  about  Lowell  in 
general.  He  sought  to  delineate  symbolic 
dimensions  the  housing  had  for  workers  by 
studying  terms  and  their  referents  as  well  as  the 
modifiers  applied  to  terms  used  for 
boardinghouses.  His  effort  to  construct  a  folk 
taxonomy  for  the  Loweil  built  environment 

Thus  the  relationship  is  metonymical.  Metonymy  is  a 
form  of  description  that  uses  a  "word  for  a  certain  object 
or  idea  to  denote  another  object  or  idea,  the  latter  in 
some  manner  associated  with  the  former,  e.g., 
identifying  the  whole  by  use  of  a  label  for  one  of  its 
parts."  (Brown  1979:  257).  In  this  case,  artifacts,  like 
words,  signify  ideas  or  concepts  and  facilitate  the 
metaphorical  shift. 


290    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


resulted  in  fact  in  a  cognitive  map  of  the 
semantic  domain  workers  employed  in 
communicating  about  their  surroundings.4 
Horwitz  noted  that  although  workers  did  not  use 
the  term  home  with  any  regularity  to  denote  the 
boardinghouses,  they  nevertheless  did  so  more 
often  than  he  seemed  to  expect.  Our  own  study 
suggests  why  this  is  so,  and  Horwitz's  results 
serve  further  to  clarify  the  process  of  mediation 
through  metaphor  between  ideal  home  and 
corporate  housing. 

Horwitz's  study  focuses  on  architecture,  on  the 
built  environment.  We  argue  that  Horwitz  was 
mistaken  in  trying  to  connect  worker  response  to 
their  living  spaces  with  perceptions  of  the 
external  built  environment.  The  built 
environment  of  Lowell  was  part  of  the  corporate 
machine,  serving  the  aims  of  the  capitalists,  not 
those  of  the  workers  (see  Harvey  1976).  It  is 
unlikely  that  the  built  environment  of  Lowell 
played  a  part  in  workers'  concepts  of  home 
(except  in  a  contrastive  dimension).  As  studies 
like  those  of  Cohen  (cited  above)  have  shown, 
workers  tended  to  redefine  internal  spaces 
through  material  objects  and  did  not  define 
themselves  or  their  notions  of  home  on  the  basis 
of  external  architecture.  That  is,  they  took 
control  over  what  they  could — this  seldom 
included  much  or  any  of  the  built  environment 
of  industrial  cities  (see  also  Mrozowski  and 
Beaudry  n.d.). 

It  is  clear  that  the  built  environment  of  Lowell, 
especially  the  boardinghouses  and  their  yards, 
were  spaces  that  were  both  highly  controlled  and 
controlling.  If  one  views  access  as  a  defining 
quality  of  space  (see  Hillier  and  Hanson  1988),  it 
is  easy  to  see  that  access  was  severely  limited — 
the  boardinghouses  each  had  a  single  front  door 
and  usually  a  single  door  leading  into  the 
backlot.  Access  to  the  backlot  and  its  service 
facilities,  including  the  privy,  was  through  either 
the  kitchen  or  ell,  or  in  some  cases,  through  the 
keeper's  quarters.  The  backlots  were  completely 
enclosed  with  fencing,  and  there  was  likely  no 
more  than  a  single  door  leading  from  the 
woodshed  to  the  back  alley,  possibly  kept  locked. 
In  other  words,  access  was  so  controlled  that  a 
stranger  could  not  legitimately  penetrate  this 


The  classification  cannot  be  considered  a  true  folk 
taxonomy  because  the  use  of  historical  texts  as  eliciting 
contexts  does  not  insure  recovery  of  the  entire  range  of 
names  used  to  distinguish  items  within  a  class;  see 
Beaudry  (1980:  23-24).  But  because  the  terms  one  finds 
in  such  texts  are  likely  to  be  those  in  common  use  and 
hence  the  most  expressive,  it  is  usually  true  that  they 
were  the  most  culturally  significant  in  the 
contemporary  context;  cf.  Raven,  Berlin,  and  Breedlove 
(1971:  1210-14). 


space,  and  those  who  lived  in  it  had  very  few 
options  in  terms  of  how  they  used  it  or  moved 
around  in  it.  The  backlots  further  were  embued 
both  with  the  functionality  of  utilitarian  space 
and  with  the  liminal  quality  of  a  danger  zone 
because  of  the  potentially  polluting  material — 
human  and  other  waste — to  be  found  there.  As 
Bond's  discussion  of  company  correspondence 
reveals,  the  Boott's  concern  with  what  went  on  in 
these  spaces  often  focused  on  'matter  out  of 
place'  (Douglas  1973). 

The  sense  of  newness  and  difference 
experienced  by  female  mill  operatives  in  the 
early  decades  of  Lowell  was  not  enough  for 
some,  as  early  protest  tracts  reveal.  'Juliana' 
wrote  in  1845  that  "All  is  hurry,  bustle  and 
confusion  in  the  street,  in  the  mill,  and  in  the 
overflowing  boardinghouse  (FLRA  1845:  3).  She 
exclaimed  that  the  women  were  "Crowded  into  a 
small  room  which  contains  three  beds  and  six 
females....  They  are  confined  so  long  in  close, 
unhealthy  rooms  that  it  is  a  great  wonder  that 
they  possess  any  life  or  animation,  more  than 
the  machines  which  they  have  watched  so 
unceasingly!" 

Another  writer,  'Amelia,'  wrote  bitterly  of  the 
corporations'  control  over  workers'  lives  beyond 
the  mill 

her  footsteps  must  be  dogged  to  see  that  they  do  not 
stray  beyond  the  corporation  limits,  and  she  must, 
whether  she  will  or  no,  be  subjected  to  the  manifold 
inconveniences  of  a  large  crowded  boarding-house, 
where  too,  the  price  paid  for  her  accommodation  is 
so  utterly  insignificant,  that  it  will  not  ensure  to 
her  the  common  comforts  of  life  ;  she  is  obliged  to 
sleep  in  small  comfortless,  half  ventilated 
apartment  containing  some  half  a  dozen  occupants 
each  .  .  .  (FLRA  1845:  6). 

It  is  not  altogether  surprising  that  some  young 
women  found  it  offensive  to  be  forced  "to  board 
with  the  mixed  multitude  congregated  in  a  large 
boarding  house"  (FLRA  1845:  Extract  from 
Factory  Tracts  Number  2,  np),  for  their  farming 
background  notwithstanding,  they  were 
educated  and  literate  and  held  middle  class 
ideals.  Hence  a  woman  signing  herself  simply  as 
'An  Operative'  saw  fit  to  object  to  the  rule 
compelling  all  who  worked  for  the  companies  to 
board  in  company-run  houses  on  the  basis  that  it 
conflicted  with  "our  rights  as  rational  beings" 
(FLRA  1845:  ibid.).  She  claimed  to  find  it 
intolerable  to  be  shut  up  at  night  "six  in  a  room, 
14  by  16  feet  with  all  the  trunks,  and  boxes 
necessary  to  their  convenience"  both  because  it 
denied  freedom  of  choice  and  because  it  was 
unhealthy  (ibid.).  This  despite  the  fact  that 

Those  who  keep  the  boarding  houses  do  all  in  their 
power  in  most  cases  to  make  the  stay  of  the  girls 
pleasant,  and  much  credit  is  due  to  them.    But  the 


Conclusions  291 


means  are  inadequate  to  meet  the  wants  of  the 
operatives,  and  too  many  are  made  to  occupy  the 
same  sleeping  and  sitting  apartment. 

The  crowded  conditions  made  it  impossible  to 
obtain  privacy  for  study  or  other  intellectually 
improving  pastimes;  it  also  made  it  impossible  to 
maintain  standards  of  personal  cleanliness  and 
"frequent  bathing  so  necessary  to  health"  (ibid.). 
This  disgruntled  operative  noted  that  there  was 
not  ample  accommodation  for  each  girl  to  bathe 
once  a  day,  a  situation,  she  claimed,  that  led 
every  operative  living  in  such  circumstances  to 
"violate  the  physical  laws  of  God"  (ibid.). 

These  young  women,  with  their  concern  for 
personal  space  and  privacy,  for  cleanliness  and 
adequate  ventilation,  were  expressing  views 
shared  with  the  middle  and  upper  classes, 
especially  among  reform-minded  individuals. 
They  had  absorbed  much  of  the  ideology  of 
domestic  science  and  found  its  application  in 
the  boardinghouses  wanting.  In  their  protests, 
these  female  operatives  stressed  the  importance 
of  being  permitted  to  control  their  own  non-work 
time.  The  conditions  they  decried  were  to 
worsen  over  time;  by  the  latter  part  of  the  19th 
century,  many  boardinghouses  took  in  entire 
families  as  well  as  unrelated  individuals.  Single 
persons  continued  to  be  housed  dormitory  style, 
while  a  family  of  whatever  size  occupied  a  single 
large  room.  Evidence  suggests  that  while 
reformers  found  this  situation  shocking,  the 
families  involved  did  not  necessarily  consider 
their  circumstances  unusual  or  intolerable. 

Horwitz's  textual  analysis  reveals  that  workers 
did  not  perceive  the  built  environment  of  Lowell 
as  integral  to  their  mental  constructs  of  the 
boardinghouse  as  home.  Their  concerns  were 
centered  around  interior  spaces  and  the  ways  in 
which  such  spaces  matched  their  ideals  of  a 
place  to  call  home.  This  was  constituted  by  a 
mental  process  that  set  features  of  true  home  in 
opposition  to  features  of  corporate  housing.  The 
dialectical  process  reveals  the  most  important 
elements  of  the  concept  of  home:  permanence, 
comfort,  cleanliness,  order,  presence  of  kin,  etc. 
Horwitz  includes  ventilation,  freedom  from 
crowding,  and  rural  setting  as  additional 
components  of  the  definition  he  constructs.  As 
mentioned  above,  rural  setting  was  no  doubt  an 
element  used  to  contrast  Lowell  with  the  rural 
farm  setting  from  which  most  workers  came 
(hence  the  opposition  country /city  operates  on 
the  same  level  as  the  contrast  between 
crowded/isolated,  etc. — it  serves  to  highlight 
those  elements  of  the  ideal  of  home  that  survive 
in  the  context  of  boardinghouse  life  and  those 
that  do  not).  Further,  Horwitz's  scheme  and  the 
small  size  of  his  sample  do  not  permit  him  to 


evaluate  or  rank  elements  in  a  reliable  way;  he 
imputes  rather  than  delineates  stress  on  one 
element  over  another. 

It  is  telling  that,  apart  from  the  obvious 
shortcomings  of  the  boardinghouse  setting  that 
made  it  impossible  for  it  to  function  as  or  be 
perceived  of  as  true  home,  it  met  enough  of  the 
criteria  to  induce  among  workers  a  degree  of 
satisfaction  with  their  temporary  home. 

This  was  accomplished  in  large  measure 
through  the  adoption  of  fictive  kin  or  surrogate 
family  in  the  boardinghouse  setting  and,  most 
important,  through  common  acceptance  of  the 
symbolic  import  of  material  objects  that 
embodied  the  ideals  of  domestic  ideology. 
Hence  the  seeming  contradiction  between 
home  as  haven  and  the  center  of  family  life  and 
corporate  existence  in  a  boardinghouse  could  be 
mediated.  What  is  more,  the  boardinghouse 
keeper,  whose  work  making  a  living — sometimes 
a  profit — as  a  professional  housekeeper,  was 
protected  from  contamination  through 
association  with  the  orofit-oriented  male  sphere 
by  her  symbolic  role  as  surrogate  mother  and 
care-giver.  The  mediation  of  both  contradictions 
is  testimony  to  the  power  of  domestic  ideology 
and  its  penetration  into  19th-century  culture. 
Overcoming  the  contradiction  made  it  possible 
for  elements  of  domestic  ideology  that 
intersected  most  closely  with  the  aims  of 
capitalists  and  with  the  policy  of  corporate 
paternalism  to  find  form  and  expression  in  the 
boardinghouse  system  at  Lowell. 


'the  systematic  must  bow  to  the  empirical' 

We  have  set  ourselves  in  this  report  an 
enormous  and  possibly  impossible  task,  that  of 
blending  an  interpretive  approach,  normally 
applied  to  "symbolic"  aspects  of  culture,  with  the 
archeologist's  necessary  focus  on  things 
material  and  particular.  Geertz  (1980: 135)  points 
out  that  part  of  our  intellectual  legacy  from  the 
19th  century  is  a  notion  that  "'symbolic'  opposes 
to  'real'  as  fanciful  to  sober,  figurative  to  literal, 
obscure  to  plain,  aesthetic  to  practical,  mystical 
to  mundane,  and  decorative  to  substantial."  In 
this  work  we  have  attempted  to  attend  both  to 
the  materiality  of  the  data — their  substantive 
and  functional  roles — as  well  as  to  the 
ideological  roles.  Our  concern  for  the 
'situatedness'  of  the  data  prompts  us  to  focus  on 
context — archeological,  historical,  institutional, 
and  behavioral  context — but  we  have  attempted 
to  avoid  the  tendency  to  treat  meaning  and 
context  as  static,  suspended  in  time.  The 
archeological  record  encodes  time  and  encodes 
change  over  time;  hence  we  can  derive  from  it 


292    The  Board inghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 

evidence  of  historical  process  and  cultural 
change. 

To  do  so  with  any  degree  of  confidence 
requires  data;  as  Braudel  (1988:  28)  puts  it,  "it  is 
not  enough  to  have  a  correct  (or  at  least 
reasonable)  theoretical  perspective.  It  must  be 
put  to  the  test  with  the  facts...."  In  order  to  be 
able  to  test  our  interpretations  against  the  facts, 
we  have  had  to  eschew  paradigms  that  are 
'unified'  and  programmatic,  believing  that 
before  our  aims  can  be  met,  "the  systematic 
must  bow  to  the  empirical"  (Kriedte  ,  Nedick, 
and  Schlumbohn  1977,  quoted  in  Braudel  1988: 
28). 

Our  research  points  to  one  clear  fact:  people 
living  in  19th-  and  early  20th-century  Lowell 
operated  under  a  different  cultural  system  than 
our  own  (but  see  Leone  1989).  Rather  than 
tacitly  assume  that  their  history  is  our  history — 
any  more  than  their  lives  and  thoughts  were  the 
same  as  ours,  we  have  taken  the  position  that  we 
should  not  force  a  presentist  model  onto  the 
past.  The  archeology  in  fact  shows  that 
capitalism  and  what  has  been  termed  'the 
culture  of  capitalism'  has  changed  since  the  19th 
century.  What  is  more,  it  changed  over  the 
course  the  19th  century. 

Culture  is  not  monolithic,  nor  is  capitalism.  An 
approach  that  treats  either  as  such  tends  both  to 
ignore  historical  process  and  to  relegate  the  very 
people  whose  history  they  seek  to 
'reenfranchise'  to  the  status  of  victims.  Our  work 
in  Lowell  has  shown  that  though  the 
boardinghouse  system  was  ever-present  and  all- 
encompassing,  the  people  who  lived  and  worked 
under  it  were  active  participants  in  shaping  their 
own  lives,  thereby  creating  and  reinventing 
traditions  while  contributing  to  the  changing 
pattern  of  American  culture. 


REFERENCES 


Abercrombie,   Nicholas,   Stephan    Hill,   and   Brian   S. 
Turner 

1980  The  Dominant  Ideology  Thesis.  Allen  and 
Unwin,  London. 

Albert,  Lillian  Smith 

1941        A  Button  Collector's  Journal.    Hightstown,  NJ. 
Albert,  Lillian  Smith,  and  Jane  Ford  Adams 

1951        The     Button     Sampler.      M.    Barrows   and 
Company,  Inc.,  New  York. 
Alexander,  L.T. 

1986        Clay  Pipes  with  Irish  Affiliations.    Historic 
Clay  Tobacco  Pipe  Studies  3:  69-75. 
Allen,  David  Grayson 

1981  In  English  Ways:  The  Movement  of  Societies 
and  the  Transferal  of  English  Local  Law  and 
Custom  to  Massachusetts  Bay  in  the 
Seventeenth  Century.  University  of  North 
Carolina  Press,  Chapel  Hill. 

Althusser,  Louis 

1971        Ideology  and  Ideological  State  Apparatuses 

(Notes  towards  an  Investigation).    In  Lenin 

and  Philosophy  and  other  Essays,  ed.  by  Louis 

Althusser,  127-186.    Monthly  Review  Press, 

New  York. 
American  Clay  Pipe  Works 

1988        Catalog.    (Reprint  of  a  catalog  that  appeared 

between  1915  and  1920.)  American  Clay  Pipe 

Works,  Incorporated,  New  York. 
Ames,  Kenneth 

1980        Material       Culture       as       Nonverbal 

Communication:     A  Historical  Case  Study. 

Journal  of  American  Culture  3(4):  619-641. 
Anderson,  Michael 

1971        Family    Structure    in    Nineteenth    Century 

Lancashire.     Cambridge   University  Press, 

Cambridge. 
Anderson,  Texas  B.,  and  Roger  G.  Moore 

1988        Meaning  and   the  Built   Environment:      A 

Symbolic  Analysis  of  a  19th-century  Urban 

Site.    In  The  Recovery  of  Meaning:    Historical 

Archaeology  in  the  Eastern  United  States,  ed. 

by  Mark  P.  Leone  and  Parker  B.  Potter,  379- 

406.         Smithsonian     Institution     Press, 

Washington,  D.C. 
Andrews,  William  D.,  and  Deborah  C  Andrews 

1974        Technology     and     the     Housewife     in 

Nineteenth-century     America.     Women's 

Studies  2:  309-  328. 
Anonymous 

1835        Smoking.    [J.  D.]    New  England  Magazine  9: 

132-135. 
1842        The    Philosophy   of   Smoking.    Smoke — in 

Volumes;  A  Rhapsodical,  Erratic  Rigmarole. 

Bentley's  Miscellany    11:  65-71. 
1845        Factory  Life  as  it  is.    (1982  reprint.)     Female 

Labor  Reform  Association,  Lowell. 
1852        Pipe  Clay  and  Clay  Pipes.     Harper's    New 

Monthly  Magazine   4(23):  688-690. 

1867  Pipes  and  Tobacco.  St.  James'  Magazine  19: 
119-125. 

1868  Concerning  Cigars:  How  to  Select  Them.  With 
a  Word  About  Clays.  Stanley  Rivers  &  Co., 
London. 

1869  Tobacco  Pipes.  Scientific  American  20(10): 
146-147. 

1885  Wooden  Pipes.  [A.  J.  M.]  Notes  and  Queries  6 
S.  11:323. 


Anonymous,  cont'd. 

1886        Mill  Life.    Boston   Globe,  February  7,  1886. 

Scrapbook    in    the    University    of    Lowell 

Special  Collections,  Lowell,  MA. 
1888        Studies  of  Factory  Life  Among  the  Workers. 

Atlantic  Monthly  52(Sept.,  1888):  315. 
1897        Evolution  in  Smoking  Methods.     Harper's 

Weekly  41:  1163. 

1903  The  Making  of  the  Clay  Pipe.  (Apparently 
reprinted  from  the  New  York  Times.) 
Scientific  American  Supplement  56:  23138. 

1904  Curious  Pipes.   Canadian  Magazine  23:  93-94. 
1906        Cigarette  Smoking  Among  Englishwomen  No 

Uncommon    Practice.   New  York  Times,  25 

March  1906,  section  3,  p.  7. 
1909        Women  and  Pipes.     [C.  C.  B.]     Notes   and 

Queries  10  S.  12:378. 
1913        The  Clay  Pipes  of  Gentility.    [L.  L.  K.]  Notes 

and  Queries  11  S.  8:  257. 
1952        In  Praise  of  the  Common  Clay.    Chambers' 

Journal,  July,  1952:  393-394. 
1964        Tobacco    and    Its    Effects — A    Nineteenth 

Century   View.      Indiana    History    Bulletin 

41(1):  203-204. 
1988        A  Proposed  Classification  of  Plastic  Buttons. 

The  National  Button  Bulletin  47(1):  5-18. 
Asbury,  Herbert 

1947        The  Barbary  Coast:     An  Informal  History  of 

the  San  Francisco  Underworld.    Third  edition. 

Pocket  Books,  New  York. 
Associated  Tobacco  Pipe  Makers'  Society  of  Scotland  and 

Ireland 
1900        Price  List  as  agreed  upon  between  Employers 

and  Employees,  the  same  to  come  into  force 

from  August  20th,  1900.     Labour  Literature 

Society,  Glasgow. 
Atwater,  W.  O. 

1886        Food   Consumption:      Qualities,   Costs,   and 

Nutrients  of  Food  Materials.     Massachusetts 

Bureau  of  Statistics  of  Labor  Annual  Report 

17:  237-326. 
Austin,  William 

n..d         Regulations  of  the  Boarding  Houses  of  the 

Lawrence  Manufacturing  Company.  Museum 

of  American  Textile  History,  North  Andover, 

MA. 
Barber,  E.  A. 

1904        Marks  of  American   Potters,  Patterson   and 

White,    Philadelphia. 
Barthes,  Roland 

1957a      La  nouvelle  Citroen.    In  Mythologies,  ed.  by 

Roland  Barthes,  150-152.    Editions  du  Seuil, 

Paris. 
1957b      Le  mythe,  aujourd'hui.   In  Mythologies,  ed.  by 

Roland  Barthes,  191-247.    Editions  du  Seuil, 

Paris. 

1981  Le  grain  de  la  voix,  entretiens  1962-1980. 
Editions  du  Seuil,  Paris. 

Baugher-Perlin,  Sherene 

1978  The  Prall  Site:  A  Case  Study  in  Historical 
Archaeology.  Unpublished      Ph.D 

dissertation,  State  University  of  New  York, 
Stony  Brook,  New  York. 

1982  Analyzing  Glass  Bottles  for  Chronology, 
Function,  and  Trade  Networks.  In 
Archaeology  of  Urban  America:  The  Search 
for  Pattern  and  Process.,  ed.  by  Roy  S.  Dickens, 
259-290  Academic  Press,  New  York. 


293 


294    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Bazzaz,  F.  A. 

1974        Ecophysiology  of  Ambrosia  Artemisiifolia:   A 
Successional  Dominant.  Ecology  55:  112-119. 
Beaudry,  Mary  C. 

1980  "Or  What  Else  You  Please  to  Call  It":  Folk 
Semantic  Domains  in  Early  Virginia  Probate 
Inventories.  Ph.D.  diss.,  Brown  University, 
Providence,  RI.  University  Microfilms 
International,  Ann  Arbor. 

1984a  Archaeology  and  the  Historical  Household. 
Man  in  the  Northeast   28(1):  27-38. 

1984b  An  Archeological  Perspective  on  Social 
Inequality  in  17th-Century  Massachusetts. 
American  Archeologist  4(1):  55-60. 

1984c  Interpreting  the  Past:  Ceramics  and  the 
Historical  Archaeologist.  In  Unearthing 
New  England's  Past:  The  Ceramic  Evidence, 
ed.  by  Barbara  J.  Franco,  12-14.  Museum  of 
Our  National  Heritage,  Lexington,  MA. 

1986  The  Archaeology  of  Historical  Land  Use  in 
Massachusetts.  Historical  Archaeology 
20(2):  38^16. 

1987  Archeological  Testing  at  the  Proposed  Lowell 
Boarding  House  Park  Site.  In 
Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of  the  Boott 
Mills  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  Volume  I:  Life 
at  the  Boarding  Houses:  A  Preliminary 
Report,  ed.  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and  Stephen 
A.  Mrozowski,  69-114.  Cultural  Resources 
Management  Studies  18.  U.S.  Department  of 
the  Interior,  National  Park  Service,  North 
Atlantic  Regional  Office,  Boston. 

1988  (Editor)  Documentary  Archaeology  in  the 
New  World.  Cambridge  University  Press, 
Cambridge. 

1989  The  Lowell  Boott  Mills  Complex  and  Its 
Housing:  Material  Expressions  of  Corporate 
Ideology.  Historical  Archaeology  23(1):  19- 
32. 

Beaudry,  Mary  C,  and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski 

1987a  (Editors)  Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of 
the  Boott  Mills,  Lowell,  Massachusetts. 
Volume  I:  Life  at  the  Boarding  Houses:  A 
Preliminary  Report.  Cultural  Resources 
Management  Studies  18.  U.S.  Department  of 
the  Interior,  National  Park  Service,  North 
Atlantic  Regional  Office,  Boston. 

1987b  (Editors)  Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of 
the  Boott  Mills,  Lowell,  Massachusetts. 
Volume  II:  The  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House. 
Cultural  Resources  Management  Studies  19. 
U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior,  National 
Park  Service,  North  Atlantic  Regional 
Office,  Boston. 

1987c  Research  Design  for  the  Boott  Mills  Study.  In 
Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of  the  Boott 
Mills  Lowell,  Mas:achusetts.  Volume  I:  Life 
at  the  Boarding  Houses:  A  Preliminary 
Report,  ed.  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and  Stephen 
A.  Mrozowski,  5-8.  Cultural  Resources 
Management  Studies  18.  U.S.  Department  of 
the  Interior,  National  Park  Service,  North 
Atlantic  Regional  Office,  Boston. 

1987d  The  Archeological  Record  at  the  Kirk  Street 
Agents'  House,  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  In 
Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of  the  Boott 
Mills,  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  Volume  II: 
The  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House.  Cultural 
Resources  Management  Studies  19.  U.S. 
Department  of  the  Interior,  National  Park 
Service,  North  Atlantic  Regional  Office, 
Boston. 


Beaudry,  Mary  C,  and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski,  cont'd. 
1987e      Summary      and      Conclusions.  In 

Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of  the  Boott 
Mills,  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  Volume  II: 
The  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House,  ed.  by  Mary  C 
Beaudry  and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski,  143-152. 
Cultural  Resources  Management  Studies  19. 
U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior,  National 
Park  Service,  North  Atlantic  Regional 
Office,  Boston. 
1988  The  Archeology  of  Work  and  Home  Life  in 
Lowell,  Massachusetts:  An  Interdisciplinary 
Study  of  the  Boott  Mills  Cotton  Corporation. 
IA,  The  Journal  of  the  Society  for  Industrial 
Archeology  14(2):  1-22. 

Beecher,  Catherine  E. 

1841  A  Treatise  on  Domestic  Economy.  Source  Book 
Press,  Boston. 

Beecher,  Catherine  E.,  and  Harriet  Beecher  Stowe 

1869  The  American  Woman's  Home  or,  Principles 
of  Domestic  Science;  Being  a  Guide  to  the 
Formation  and  Mainentance  of  Economical, 
Healthful  Beautiful  and  Christian  Homes. 
1987  reprint  edition.  Stowe-Day  Foundation, 
Hartford,  CT. 

Behre,  K.  E. 

1983  The  Interpretation  of  Anthropogenic 
Indicators  in  Pollen  Diagrams.  Pollen  et 
Spores  23(2):  225-245. 

Bell,  Edward  L. 

1987a  A  Preliminary  Report  on  Health,  Hygiene, 
and  Sanitation  at  the  Boott  Mills  Boarding 
Houses:  An  Historical  and  Archeological 
Perspective.  In  Interdisciplinary 
Investigations  of  the  Boott  Mills,  Lowell, 
Massachusetts.  Volume  I:  Life  at  the 
Boarding  Houses:  A  Preliminary  Report,  ed. 
by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and  Stephen  A. 
Mrozowski,  55-66.  Cultural  Resources 
Management  Studies  18.  U.S.  Department  of 
the  Interior,  National  Park  Service,  North 
Atlantic  Regional  Office,  Boston. 
1987b  "So  Much  Like  Home":  The  Historical 
Context  of  the  Kirk  Street  Agent's  House.  In 
Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of  the  Boott 
Mills  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  Volume  II:  The 
Kirk  Street  Agents'  House,  ed.  by  Mary  C. 
Beaudry  and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski.,  5-27. 
Cultural  Resources  Management  Studies  19. 
U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior,  National 
Park  Service,  North  Atlantic  Regional 
Office,  Boston. 

Bennett,  Tony 

1986        Introduction:  Popular  Culture  and 'the  Turn  to 
Gramsci.'     In  Popular   Culture  and   Social 
Relations,  ed.  by  Tony  Bennett,  Colin  Mercer, 
and  Janet  Woolacott,  xi-xix.  Open  University 
Press,  Milton  Keynes. 

Bennett,  Tony,  Colin  Mercer,  and  Janet  Woolacott,  eds. 
1981        Culture,     Ideology,     and     Social     Process. 
Batsford  Academic  and  Educational,  Ltd., 
London. 
1986        Popular  Culture  and  Social  Relations.    Open 
University  Press,  Milton  Keynes. 

Benninghoff,  W.  S. 

1962  Calculation  of  Pollen  and  Spores  Density  in 
Sediments  by  Addition  of  Exotic  Pollen  in 
Known  Amounts.  Pollen  et  Spores  6(2):  332- 
333. 


References  295 


Biddle,  Martin 

1976        Towns.    In  The  Archaeology  of  Anglo-Saxon 

England,    ed.    by    David    Wilson,    99-150. 

Cambridge  University  Press,  Cambridge. 
Black,  C.  A.,  ed. 

1965        Methods  of  Soil  Analysis   Part  1:     Physical 

and    Mineralogical     Properties,    Including 

Statistics    of    Measurement    and    Sampling. 

American  Society  of  Agronomy,  Inc.,  Madison, 

WI. 
Boggs,  Carl 

1976  Cramsci's  Marxism.  Pluto  Press,  London. 
Bograd,  Mark 

1989  Whose  Life  is  it  Anyway?  Contextual 
Archaeology  and  the  Study  of  Status.  Paper 
presented  at  the  22nd  Annual  Meetings  of  the 
Society  for  Historical  Archaeology, 
Baltimore,  MD. 
Bond,  Kathleen  H. 

1986  Interviews  with  Blanche  P.  Graham.  Ms.  on 
file,  Department  of  Archaeology,  Boston 
University,  Boston. 

1987  A  Preliminary  Report  on  the  Demography  of 
the  Boott  Mills  Housing  Units  #33-^18,  1838- 
1942.  In  Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of 
the  Boott  Mills,  Lowell,  Massachusetts. 
Volume  I:  Life  in  the  Boarding  Houses:  A 
Preliminary  Report,  ed.  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry 
and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski,  35-55;  Appendix 
B.  Cultural  Resources  Management  Studies  18. 
U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior,  National 
Park  Service,  North  Atlantic  Regional 
Office,  Boston. 

1988  Alcohol  Use  in  the  Boott  Mills 
Boardinghouses:  Tension  Between  Workers 
and  Management,  A  Documentary  and 
Archaeological  Study.  M.A  thesis,  Boston 
University. 

1989  Company  Policy  and  Alcohol  Use  at  the  Boott 
Mills  Housing,  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  Paper 
presented  at  the  22nd  Annual  Meetings  of  the 
Society  for  Historical  Archaeology, 
Baltimore,  MD. 

Boott  Mills  Correspondence  Book 

1888-91        Manuscript  on   file,   University  of  Lowell 
Special  Collections,  Lowell,  MA. 

Boston  City  Directories 

Boston  City  Directories,  various  titles  and 
publishers,  on  file  at  the  Massachusetts  State 
Library  Special  Collections,  Boston. 

Bourdieu,  Pierre 

1977  The  Berber  House.  In  Rules  and  Meanings,  ed. 
by  Mary  Douglas,  98-110.  Penguin, 
Harmonds  worth. 

Braudel,  Fernand 

1981        The  Structures  of  Everyday  Life:    Civilization 

and     Capitalism,     15th-18th      Centuries. 

Harper  &  Row,  New  York. 
1988        The  Identity  of  France.     Volume  I:     History 

and    Environment.     (Translated  by  Sian  N. 

Reynolds.)  Harper  and  Row,  New  York. 
Braun,  E.  L. 

1950        Deciduous  Forests  of  Eastern  North  America. 

The  Blackstone  Co.,  Philadelphia. 
Britton,  Nathanial  Lord,  and  Addison  Lord 

1898        An  Illustrated  Flora  of  the  Northern   United 

Slates  and  Canada  from  Newfoundland  to  the 

Parallel     of    the     Southern     Boundary     of 

Virginia  and  from  Atlantic  Ocean    Westward 

to  the  102d  Meridian.    2nd  ed.    (1970  reprint.) 

Dover  Publications,  New  York. 


Broehl,  Wayne  G.,  Jr. 

1964        The  Molly  Maguires.     Harvard  University 
Press,  Cambridge,  MA. 
Brown,  Cecil  H. 

1979  A  Theory  of  Lexical  Change  (with  Examples 
from  Folk  Biology,  Human  Anatomical 
Partonomy  and  Other  Domains). 
Anthropological  Linguistics  21(6):  257. 

Brown,  D.  W. 

1984  Prospects  and  Limits  of  a  Phytolith  Key  for 
Grasses  in  the  Central  United  States.  Journal 
of  Archaeological  Science  11:  345-368. 

1986  Taxonomy  of  a  Midcontinent  Grasslands 
Phytolith  Key.  In  Plant  Opal  Phytolith 
Analysis  in  Archaeology  and  Paleoecology, 
ed.  by  Irwin  Rovner,  67-85.  Occasional  Papers 
No.  1  of  The  Phytolitharien.  North  Carolina 
State  University  Press,  Raleigh. 

Brown,  Fidelia  O. 

1976  Decline  and  Fall.  In  Cotton  was  King:  A 
History  of  Lowell,  Massachusetts,  ed.by 
Arthur  L.  Eno,  141-158.  The  New  Hampshire 
Publishing  Company,  Somersworth. 

Brown,  Marley  R.  Ill 

1987  Issues  of  Scale  Revisited.  Society  for 
Historical  Archaeology  Newsletter  20(1):  25- 
27. 

Bryant,  L.  S.,  and  J.  B.  Rae,  eds. 

1950  Lowell:  An  Early  American  Industrical 
Community.  Published  for  The  Technology 
Press,  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology, 
Cambridge,  MA,  by  the  Murray  Printing 
Company,  Wakefield,  MA. 
Buol,  S.  W.,  F.  D.  Hole,  and  R.  J.  McCracken 

1973        Soil   Genesis  and  Classification.     Iowa  State 
University  Press,  Ames. 
Burley,  David  V. 

1989  Function,  Meaning  and  Context:  Ambiguities 
in  Ceramic  Use  by  the  Hivernant  Metis  of  the 
Northwestern      Plains.  Historical 

Archaeology  23(1):  97-106. 
Busch,  Jane 

1987        Second  Time  Around:  A  Look  at  Bottle  Reuse. 
Historical  Archaeology  (21)1:  67-80. 
Butzer,  Karl  W. 

1971  Environment  and  Archaeology:  An  Ecological 
Approach  to  Prehistory.    Aldine,  Chicago. 

1980  Context  in  Archaeology:  An  Alternative 
Perspective.  Journal  of  Field  Archaeology 
7(4):  417-422 

1982        Archaeology  as  Human  Ecology.    Cambridge 

University  Press,  New  York. 
Byington,  Margaret  F. 

1910       Homestead:    The  Households  of  a  Mill  Town. 

(1974  reprint.)  University  of  Pittsburgh  Press, 

Pittsburgh. 
"Caius" 

1836        Smoke!     Tail's    Edinburgh   Magazine,  new 

series,  3:  383-387. 
Candee,  Richard  M. 

1982        New  Towns  of  the  Early  New  England  Textile 

Industry.      In   Perspectives    in     Vernacular 

Architecture,  ed.  by  Camille  Wells,  31-50. 

Vernacular  Architecture  Forum,  Annapolis, 

Maryland. 

1985  Architecture  and  Corporate  Planning  in  the 
Early  Waltham  System.  In  Essays  from  the 
Lowell  Conference  on  Industrial  History  1982 
and  1983,  ed.  by  Robert  Weible,  17-43. 
Museum  of  American  Textile  History,  North 
Andover,  MA. 


296    The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Calver,  William  Louis 

1950  Historical  Clay  Pipes.  In  History  Written 
with  Pick  and  Shovel,  ed.  by  William  Louis 
Calver  and  Reginald  Pelham  Bolton,  280-291. 
[Essay  originally  published  in  1931.]  New- 
York  Historical  Society,  New  York. 
Calver,  William  Lewis,  and  Reginald  Pelham  Bolton 

1950        History  Written  with  Pick  and  Shovel.    New- 
York  Historical  Society,  New  York. 
Center  for  History  Now 

1985        The    Boardinghouse    System    in    Lowell. 
Exhibits  Planning  Report.    Vol.  1.    Ms.  on  file 
with    the   National    Park   Service,    Lowell 
Industrial  Heritage  Park,  Lowell,  MA. 
Cheney, John 

1980  A  New  Method  for  Dating  Late  Nineteenth 
and  Early  Twentieth-Century  Bottle  Glass. 
Paper  presented  at  the  Annual  Meetings  of 
the  Council  for  Northeast  Historical 
Archaeology,  Albany,  NY. 

1982  Site  Evaluation  and  Analysis  of  the  Pearl 
Street  Dump  Site,  Gardner,  Massachusetts.. 
Institute  for  Conservation  Archaeology. 
Peabody  Museum,  Harvard 

University,Cambridge,  MA. 
Clancey,  Gregory  K. 

1987a  The  Boott  Mills  Boardinghouses  and  Adjacent 
Structures:  The  Evidence  of  Maps  and 
Photographs.  In       Interdisciplinary 

Investigations  of  the  Boott  Mills,  Lowell, 
Massachusetts.  Volume   I:      Life    in    the 

Boarding  Houses:  A  Preliminary  Report,  ed. 
by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and  Stephen  A. 
Mrozowski,  15-34.  Cultural  Resources 
Management  Studies  18.  U.  S.  Department  of 
the  Interior,  National  Park  Service,  North 
Atlantic  Regional  Office,  Boston. 

1987b  An  Architectural  Study  of  the  Kirk  Street 
Agents'  House.  In  Interdisciplinary 
Investigations  of  the  Boott  Mills  Lowell, 
Massachusetts.  Volume  II:  The  Kirk  Street 
Agents'  House,  ed.  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and 
Stephen  A.  Mrozowski.,  29-42.  Cultural 
Resources  Management  Studies  19.  U.S. 
Department  of  the  Interior,  National  Park 
Service,  North  Atlantic  Regional  Office, 
Boston. 
Clark,  B.  F. 

1864        Prohibition  of  the  Sale  of  Intoxicating  Liquor 
Impracticable:   The  Maine   Law  a  Failure:  A 
Stringent    License    Law    the    True    Policy. 
Lowell,  MA. 
Clark,  Grahame 

1969        Archaeology  and   Society.     Barnes  &  Noble, 
New  York. 
Clement,  Joyce 

1989  The  Matruation  of  the  American  Military:  A 
Case  Study  from  Fort  Independence,  Boston, 
1800-1820.  MA.  thesis,  Department  of 
Anthropology,  University  of  Massachusetts, 
Boston. 
Coburn,  Frederick  L. 

1920        History   of  Lowell   and  Its   People.     Vol.  1. 
Lewis  Historical  Publishing  Company,  New 
York. 
Coburn,  Silas  R. 

1922  History  of  Dracut  Massachusetts.  Courier 
Citizen,  Lowell. 

1913  Genealogy  of  the  Descendants  of  Edward 
Colburn  Coburn.  Privately  published,  Lowell, 
MA. 


Cohen,  Lizabeth  A. 

1986  Embellishing  a  Life  of  Labor:  An 
Interpretation  of  the  Material  Culture  of 
American  Working-Class  Homes,  1885-1915. 
In  Common  Places:  Readings  in  American 
Vernacular  Architecture,  ed.  by  Dell  Upton 
and  John  Michael  Vlach,  261-278.  University 
of  Georgia  Press,  Athens. 

Coleman,  J.  Walter 

1936        The  Molly  Maguire  Riots:    Industrial  Conflict 
in    the    Pennsylvania    Coal    Region.     (1969 
reprint.)  Arno  Press,  New  York. 

Coleman,  Richard  P. 

1961  The  Significance  of  Social  Stratification  in 
Selling.       In    Marketing:  A    Maturing 

Discipline,   ed.    by   M.    L.    Bell,    171-184. 
American  Marketing  Association,  Chicago. 

Collard,  E., 

1984  Nineteenth-Century  Pottery  and  Porcelain  in 
Canada.   McGill  University  Press,  Montreal. 

Cook,  Lauren  J. 

1988  Exploratory  Analysis  of  Selected  Clay 
Tobacco-Pipe  Data.  Manuscript  in  the 
possession  of  the  author. 

1989  Tobacco-Related  Material  from  the  Boott 
Mills  Boardinghouses,  Lowell, 
Massachusetts.  Paper  presented  at  the  22nd 
Annual  Meetings  of  the  Society  for  Historical 
Archaeology,  Baltimore,  MD. 

Cook,  S.  F.,  and  R.  F.  Heizer 

1965        Studies     on     the     Chemical     Analysis     of 
Archaeological       Sites.        University    of 
California  Publication  in  Anthropology,  Los 
Angeles. 
Coolidge,  John 

1942        Mill  and  Mansion:  A   Study  of  Architecture 
and     Society     in     Lowell,     Massachusetts. 
Macmillan  and  Company,  New  York. 
Cooper,  T.P. 

1908        The    Story    of    the    Clay    Tobacco    Pipe. 
Scientific  American  Supplement  1693:  381. 
Cornwall,  I.  W. 

1958        Soils  for  the  Archaeologist.    Phoenix,  London. 
Corson,  Richard 

1971        Fashions  in  Hair:     The  First  Five  Thousand 
Years.  Peter  Owen,  London. 
Courbin,  Paul 

1988        What    is    Archaeology?      An    Essay   on    the 
Nature      of      Archaeological      Research. 
(Translated  by  Paul  Bahn.)     University  of 
Chicago  Press,  Chicago, 
de  Courtais,  Georgine 

1973        Women's     Headdress     and    Hairstyles,     in 
England  from  AD  600  to  the  Present  Day.    BT 
Batsford,  Ltd.,  London. 
Couvares,  Francis  G. 

1984        The    Remaking    of   Pittsburgh:       Class    and 
Culture  in  an  Industrializing  City,  1877-1919. 
State  University  of  New  York  Press,  Albany. 
Cowley,  Charles 

1868        Illustrated    History    of    Lowell.        Lee     & 
Shepard,  Boston. 
Crosby,  Alfred  W.,  Jr. 

1976        Epidemic  and  Peace,  1918.    Greenwood  Press, 

Westport,  CT. 

Csiksentmihalyi,  Mihalyi,  and  Eugene  Rochberg-Halton 

1981        The  Meaning  of  Things:     Domestic  Symbols 

and  the  Self.     Cambridge  University  Press, 

Cambridge. 


References  297 


Cunnington,  C.  Willett,  Phillis  Cunnington,  and  Charles 
Beard 
1960        A  Dictionary  of  English  Costume.    Adam  and 
Charles  Black,  London. 
Cushing,  E.  J. 

1964        Redeposited  Pollen  in  Late  Wisconsin  Pollen 
Spectra    from     East-Central     Minnesota. 
American  journal  of  Science  262:  1075-1088. 
Cushion,  J.  P. 

1980        Handbook   of  Pottery   and   Porcelain   Marks. 
Faber  &  Faber,  London. 
Dalzell,  Robert  F.,  Jr. 

1987        Enterprising  Elite:    The  Boston  Associates  and 
the  World  They  Made..    Harvard   University 
Press,  Cambridge,  MA. 
Davidoff,  Leonore 

1979  The  Separation  of  Work  and  Home? 
Landladies  and  Lodgers  in  Nineteenth-  and 
Twentieth-Century  England.  In  Fit  Work  for 
Women,  ed.  by  Sandra  Burman,  64-97.  St. 
Martin's  Press,  New  York. 
Davis,  R.B. 

1967        Pollen  Studies  of  Near  Surface  Sediments  in 
Maine  Lakes.     In  Quaternary    Paleoecology, 
ed.  by  E.  J.  Cushing  and  H.  E.  Wright,  143-173. 
Yale  University  Press,  New  Haven. 
Davis,  Simon  J.  M. 

1987        The      Archaeology      of     Animals.       Yale 
University  Press,  New  Haven. 
Davison,  G. 

1983  The  City  as  a  Natural  System:  Theories  of 
Urban  Society  in  Early  Nineteenth  Century 
Britain.  In  The  Pursuit  of  Urban  History,  ed. 
by  D.  Fraser  and  A.  Sutcliffe,  349-370. 
Edward  Arnold,  London. 
Deagan,  Kathleen 

1982        Avenues  of  Inquiry  in  Historical  Archaeology. 
InAdvances    in    Archaeological   Method   and 
Theory  Volume  5,  ed.  by  Michael  R.  Schiffer, 
151-178.  Academic  Press,  New  York. 
DeCunzo,  Lu  Ann 

1982  Household,  Economics,  and  Ethnicity  in 
Paterson's  Dublin  1829-1915:  The  Van  Houten 
Street  Parking  Lot  Block.  Northeast 
Historical  Archaeology  11:  9-25. 
1987  Adapting  to  City  and  Factory:  Illustrations 
from  the  Industrialization  and  Urbanization 
of  Patterson,  New  Jersey.  In  Consumer  Choice 
in  Historical  Archaeology,  ed.  by  Suzanne  M. 
Spencer- Wood,  261-293.  Plenum  Press,  New 
York. 
Deetz,  James 

1974  A  Cognitive  Historical  Model  for  American 
Material  Culture:  1620-1835.  In 
Reconstructing  Complex  Societies:  An 
Archaeological  Colloquium,  ed.  by  Charlotte 
B  Moore,  21-24.  Supplement  to  the  Bulletin  of 
the  American  Schools  of  Oriental  Research 
No.  20. 
1977  In  Small  Things  Forgotten:  The  Archaeology 
of  Everyday  Life  in  Early  America.  Anchor 
Books,  New  York. 
Dennett,  John  Richard 

1965        The  South  As  It  Is:  1865-1866.    Viking  Press, 
New  York. 
Denning,  Michael 

1987  Mechanic  Accents:  Dime  Novels  and 
Working-Class  Culture  in  America.  Verso, 
London. 


DePaoli,  Neill,  and  Maxine  Farkas 

1982  Patterns  of  Settlement  and  Land  Use.  In 
Historical  and  Archaeological  Resources  of 
Southeast  Massachusetts,  33-127. 
Massachusetts  Historical  Commission, 
Boston. 

Dillow,  Gordon  L. 

1981        Thank  You  For  Not  Smoking:   The  Hundred- 
Year  War  Against  the  Cigarette.    American 
Heritage  32(2):  97-107. 
Dimbleby,  G.  W. 

1985        The    Palynology    of    Archaeological    Sites. 
Academic  Press,  New  York. 
Dincauze,  Dena  F. 

1987  Strategies  for  Paleoenvironmental 
Reconstruction  in  Archaeology.  In  Advances 
in  Archaeological  Method  and  Theory  11,  ed. 
by  Michael  R.  Schiffer,  255-235.  Academic 
Press,  Orlando. 
Douglas,  Ian 

1983  The  Urban  Environment.  Edward  Arnold, 
London. 

Douglas,  Mary 

1973        Natural  Symbols:    Explorations  in  Cosmology. 
Vintage  Books,  New  York. 
Douglas,  Mary,  and  Baron  Isherwood 

1979        The   World  of  Goods.     W.  W.  Norton,  New 
York. 
Doyle,  Arthur  Conan 

1963  The  Adventure  of  Charles  Augustus 
Milverton.  In  The  Return  of  Sherlock  Holmes, 
160-178.   Berkely  Medallion,  New  York. 

Dublin,  Thomas 

1979  Women  at  Work:  The  Transformation  of 
Work  and  Community  in  Lowell, 
Massachusetts,  1826-1860.  Columbia 
University  Press,  New  York. 

1981         (Editor)    From  Farm   to  Factory:     The  Mill 
Experience    and    Women's    Lives    in    New 
England,  1930-1860.     Columbia  University 
Press,  New  York. 
Dumbrell,  Roger 

1983  Understanding  Antique  Wine  Bottles. 
Antique  Collector's  Club,  Woodbridge, 
England. 

Dun,  R.  G.  &  Co. 

1891-2         Credit  records,  1891  and  1892.    Ms.  on  file, 

Baker     Library,      Harvard      University, 

Cambridge,  MA. 
Eidt,  Robert 

1984  Advances  in  Abandoned  Settlement  Analysis. 
University  of  Wisconsin,  Milwaukee. 

Elder,  Glen  R,  Jr. 

1978  Approaches  to  Social  Change  and  the 
Family.  In  Turning  Points:  Historical  and 
Sociological  Essays  on  the  Family,  ed.  by  John 
Demos  and  Sarane  Spence  Babcock,  1-38. 
University  of  Chicago  Press,  Chicago. 

Epstein,  Diana 

1968  Buttons.  Walker  and  Company,  New  York. 
Erdtman,  G. 

1969  Handbook  of  Palynology.  Hafner  Publishing 
Co.,  New  York. 

Evening  Citizen 

1888        Request  to  revoke  liquor  licenses  on  Paige 
Street.  April  7,  1888. 
Faegri,  K.,  and  J.  Iverson 

1964  Textbook  of  Pollen  Analysis.  Hafner 
Publishing  Co.,  New  York. 


298   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Faulkner,  Alaric,  Kim  Mark  Peters,  David  P.  Sell,  and 
Edwin  S.  Dethlefsen 

1978  Port  and  Market:    Archaeology  of  the  Central 

Waterfront,  Newburyport,  Massachusetts. 
Printed  for  the  National  Park  Service, 
Interagency  Archeological  Services-Atlanta 
by  Newburyport  Press,  Newburyport,  MA. 

Female  Labor  Reform  Association 

1845  Factory  Tracts  Numbers  1  and  2:  Factory  Life 
As  It  Is:  by  an  Operative.  1982  reprint 
edition.   Lowell  Publishing  Company,  Lowell. 

Fike,  Richard  E. 

1987  The  Bottle  Book:  A  Comprehensive  Guide  to 
Historic,  Embossed  Medicine  Bottles. 
Peregrine  Smith  Books,  Salt  Lake  City. 

Fischer,  Roger  A. 

1988  Tippecanoe  and  Trinkets  Too:  The  Material 
Culture  of  American  Presidential  Campaigns 
1828-1984.  University  of  Illinois  Press, 
Urbana. 

Fisher,  R.  F.,  M.  J.  Jenkins,  and  William  F.  Fisher 

1987  Fire  and  Prairie-Forest  Mosaic  of  Devils 
Tower  National  Monument.  American 
Midland  Naturalist  117(2):  250-257. 

Fisher,  R.  F.,  and  William  F.  Fisher 

1988  Capitol  Reef  Phytolith  Study.  Report  on  file, 
Forestry  Department,  Utah  State  University, 
Logan. 

Fisher,  William  F. 

1987a  Amanda  Fox  Lives.  Ms.  on  file,  Department  of 
Archaeology,  Boston  University,  Boston,  MA. 
1987b  Report  on  the  Analysis  of  Opal  Phytoliths 
from  Excavations  at  the  Kirk  Street  Agents' 
House,  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  In 
Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of  the  Boott 
Mills  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  Volume  II:  The 
Kirk  Street  Agents'  House,  ed.  by  Mary  C. 
Beaudry  and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski.,  122-127. 
Cultural  Resources  Management  Studies  19. 
National  Park  Service,  North  Atlantic 
Regional  Office,  Boston. 
Fisher,  William  F.,  and  Gerald  K.  Kelso 

1987  The  Use  of  Opal  Phytolith  Analysis  in  a 
Comprehensive  Environmental  Study:  An 
Example  from  19th-century  Lowell, 
Massachusetts.  Northeast  Historical 
Archaeology  16:  30-45. 
Foucault,  Michel 

1972        The    Archaeology    of    Knowledge    and    the 
Discourse  on  Language.  Pantheon,  New  York. 
1977        Discipline   and    Punish:      The    Birth   of   the 

Prison.  Vintage  Books,  New  York. 
1980        Power/ Knowledge:      Selected   Interviews   and 
Other  Writings,  1972-1977.    Pantheon  Books, 
New  York. 
Fowells,  H.  A. 

1965        The  Silvics  of  Fores.  Trees.    USDA  Handbooks 
271.         United     States     Department     of 
Agriculture,  Washington,  D.C 
Fox,  Anne  A. 

1984  A  Study  of  Five  Historic  Cemeteries  at  Choke 
Canyon  Resevoir,  Live  Oak  and  McMullen 
Counties,  Texas.  Center  for  Archaeological 
Research,  The  University  of  Texas  at  San 
Antonio  Choke  Canyon  Series  9.  San  Antonio. 
Fox,  George  Henry,  M.D. 

1931        Descendants  of  Thomas  Fox  of  Concord,  Mass. 
Ms.    on    file,    Pollard    Memorial    Library, 
Lowell,  MA. 
Fresco-Corbu,  Roger 

1964  The  Rise  and  Fall  of  the  Clay  Pipe.  Country 
Life  135(3507):  1286-1289. 


Fussell,  Paul 

1983        Class.    Ballantine,  New  York. 
Gallagher,  D.  B. 

1987       Tobacco  Pipemaking  in  Glasgow  1667-1967.  In 

The  Archaeology  of  the  Clay  Tobacco  Pipe.  X. 

Scotland,  ed.  by  Peter  Davey,  35-109.    British 

Archaeological  Reports   British  Series   178. 

Oxford. 
Gallagher,  D.  B.,  and  R.  Price 

1987        Thomas  Davidson  &  Co.,  Glasgow.    In  The 

Archaeology   of  the   Clay    Tobacco   Pipe.    X. 

Scotland,    ed.    by    Peter    Davey,    110-138. 

British    Archaeological    Reports    British 

Series  178.  Oxford. 
Garrow,  Patrick  H. 

1987  The  Use  of  Converging  lines  of  Evidence  for 
Determining  Socioeconomic  Status.  In 
Consumer  Choice  in  Historical  Archaeology, 
ed.  by  Suzanne  M.  Spencer-Wood,  217-231. 
Plenum  Press,  New  York. 

Gates,  William  C,  Jr.,  and  Dana  E.  Ormerod 

1982        The     East     Liverpool     Pottery     District: 
Identification  of  Manufacturers  and  Marks. 
Historical  Archaeology  16(1-2):  1-11. 
Geertz,  Clifford 

1973  The  Interpretation  of  Cultures.  Basic  Books, 
New  York. 

1980  Negara:  The  Theatre  Stale  in  Nineteenth- 
Century  Bali.  Princeton  University  Press, 
Princeton,  NJ. 

Geis,  J.  W. 

1973        Biogenic    Silica    in    Selected    Species    of 

Deciduous  Angiosperms.    Soil  Science  116(2): 

113-119. 
Geismar,  Joan  H. 

1982        The  Archaeology  of  Social  Disintergration  in 

Skunk  Hollow,   A   Nineteenth-Century  Rural 

Black    Community.     Academic  Press,  New 

York. 
Gifford,  Diane  P.,  and  Diana  C.  Crader 

1977  A  Computer  Coding  System  for 
Archaeological  Faunal  Remains.  American 
Antiquity  42(2):  225-238. 

Glasco,  Laurence 

1978  Migration  and  Adjustment  in  the  Nineteenth- 
Century  City:  Occupation,  Property,  and 
Household  Structure  of  Native-born  Whites, 
Buffalo,  New  York,  1855.  In  Family  and 
Population  in  Nineteenth-Century  America, 
ed.  by  Tamara  K.  Hareven  and  Maris  A. 
Vinovskis,  155-178.  Princeton  University 
Press,  Princeton. 

Glassie,  Henry 

1968  Pattern  in  the  Material  Folk  Culture  of  the 
Eastern  United  States.  University  of 
Pennsylvania  Press,  Philadelphia. 
1975  Folk  Housing  in  Middle  Virginia:  A 
Structural  Analysis  of  Historic  Artifacts. 
University  of  Tennessee  Press,  Knoxville. 
Glassner,  Barry 

1988  Bodies:  Why  We  Look  the  Way  We  Do  and 
How  We  Feel  About  It.  Pergamon  Press, 
Elmsford,  NY. 

Gloucester  and  Rockport  Directory 

1875        Sampson,  Davenport  &  Company,  Boston. 

State    Library    of    Massachusetts,    Special 

Collections,  Boston. 
Godbey,  Geoffrey 

1981  Leisure  in  Your  Life:  An  Exploration. 
Saunders  College  Publishing,  Philadelphia. 


References  299 


Godden,  G.  A. 

1964        Encyclopedia  of  British  Pottery  and  Porcelain 

Marks.  Bonanza  Books,  New  York. 
Goffman,  Erving 

1971        Relations  in  Public:  Microstudies  of  the  Public 

Order.  Harper  and  Row,  New  York. 
Gould,  Elizabeth  Porter 
1885-6         Smoking,  from  College-Girls'  Point  of  View. 

Education  6:  509-512. 
Greenland,  D.  J.,  and  M.  H.  B.  Hayes 

1981  The  Chemistry  of  Soil  Processes.  John  Wiley 
and  Sons,  New  York. 

Griffin,  Sara  Swan 

1913        Quaint    Bits    of    Lowell    History:       A    Few 
Interesting      Stories      of     Earlier      Days. 
Butterfield  Printing  Company,  Lowell,  MA. 
Griffith,  M.  A.,  and  F.  Mark 

1979        The  Use  of  Soil  Analysis  in  Archaeological 
Research.    Man  in  the  Northeast  15/16:  118- 
124. 
Gross,  Laurence  F. 

1988        Building  on  Success:  Lowell  Mill  Construction 
and  Its  Results.  IA  14(2):  23-34. 
Gross,  Laurence  F.,  and  Russell  A.  Wright 

1985  Historic  Structure  Report — History  Portion: 
Building  6:  The  Counting  House:  The  Adjacent 
Courtyard,  and  the  Facades  of  Building  1  and 
2,  Boott  Mill  Complex,  Lowell  National 
Historical  Park.  Lowell,  Massachusetts. 
Prepared  for  the  National  Park  Service, 
Denver  Center,  Denver,  CO. 
Gustafson,  Carl  E.,  and  Christopher  L.  Brown 

1979  A  Key  to  the  Postcranial  Skeletal  Remains  of 
Cattle/Bison,  Elk,  and  Horse.  Reports  of 
Investigations  57.  Laboratory  of 
Anthropology,  Washington  State  University, 
Pullman. 
Gutman,  Herbert  G 

1973        Work,  Culture,  and  Society  in  Industrializing 
America,  1815-1919.     American    Historical 
Review   78(3):  531-588. 
1976        Work,  Culture  and  Society  in  Industrializing 
America:     Essays  in  American   Working-Class 
and  Social  History.     Alfred  A.  Knopf,  New 
York. 
Haerrig,  Evelyn 

1983        Antique  Combs  and  Purses.    Gallery  Graphics 
Press,  Carmel,  CA. 
Hall,  A.  R.,  and  H.  K.  Kenward,  eds. 

1982  Environmental  Archaeology  in  the  Urban 
Context  .  Council  for  British  Archaeology 
Research  Reports  43.  Council  for  British 
Archaeology,  London. 

Handel,  S.  N. 

1976        Restricted  Pollen  Flow  of  Two  Woodland 
Herbs  Determined  by  Neutron  Activation 
Analysis.   Nature  260:  422-423. 
Hareven,  Tamara  K. 

1982        Family    Time    and    Industrial    Time:       The 
Relationship   Between   the   Family  and    Work 
in    a   New    England   Industrial   Community. 
Cambridge  University  Press,  New  York. 
Hareven,  Tamara  K.,  and  John  Modell 

1973        Urbanization  and  the  Malleable  Household: 
An  Examination  of  Boarding  and  Lodging  in 
American  Families,    journal  of  Marriage  and 
the  Family  35:  467-479. 
Hareven,  Tamara  K.,  and  Maris  A.  Vinovskis,  eds. 

1978  Family  and  Population  in  Nineteenth- 
Century  America.  Princeton  University  Press, 
Princeton,  NJ. 


Hargreaves,  Jennifer 

1989        The  Promise  and  Problems  of  Women's  Leisure 

and  Sport,  pp.  130-149  in  Chris  Rojek,  ed., 

Leisure  for   Leisure:   Critical   Essays.     New 

York:  Routledge. 
Harrington,  Faith 

1989        The  Emergent  Elite  in  Early  18th  Century 

Portsmouth:    The  Archaeology  of  the  Joseph 

Sherburne  Houselot.    Historical  Archaeology 

23(1):  2-18. 
Harrington,  J.C. 

1954        Dating  Stem  Fragments  of  Seventeenth  and 

Eighteenth   Century   Clay   Tobacco   Pipes. 

Quarterly  Bulletin,  Archaeological  Society  of 

Virginia  9(1):  not  paginated. 
Harvey,  David 

1976  Labor,  Capital,  and  Class  Struggle  around  the 
Built  Environment  in  Advanced  Capitalist 
Societies.    Politics  and  Society  6(3):  265-295. 

Hassan,  Fekri  A. 

1978  Sediments  in  Archaeology:  Methods  and 
Implications  for  Paleoenvironmental  and 
Cultural  Analysis.  Journal  of  Field 
Archaeology  5:    197-213. 

Havinga,  A.  J. 

1974  Problems  in  the  Interpretation  of  Pollen 
Diagrams  of  Mineral  Soils.  Geologie  en 
Mijnbouw  53:  449-453. 

1984  A  20  Year  Experimental  Investigation  into 
Differential  Corrosion  Susceptibility  of 
Pollen  and  Spores  of  Various  Types.  Pollen  el 
Spores  26(3-4):  541-558. 

Hawkes,  Terence 

1977  Structuralism  and  Semiotics.  University  of 
California  Press,  Berkeley. 

Hayden,  Dolores 

1981  The  Grand  Domestic  Revolution:  A  History  of 
Feminist  Designs  for  American  Homes, 
Neighborhoods,  and  Cities.  MIT  Press, 
Cambridge,  MA. 

Hebdige,  Dick 

1979  Subculture:  The  Meaning  of  Style.  Methuen, 
London. 

Heimann,  Robert  K. 

1960        Tobacco  and  Americans.    McGraw-Hill,  New 
York. 
Henn,  Roselle  E. 

1985  Reconstructing  the  Urban  Foodchain: 
Advances  and  Problems  in  Interpreting  Faunal 
Remains  Recovered  from  Household  Deposits. 
American  Archeology    5(3):  202-209. 

Henry,  Susan  L.,  and  Patrick  H.  Garrow 

1982a      The  Historic  Component.    In  City  of  Phoenix: 

Archaeology  of  the  Original  Townsite,  Blocks 

1  and  2,  ed.  by  J.  S.  Cable,  S.  L.  Henry,  and  D. 

E.  Doyel,  181-382.   Soil  Systems  Publications 

in  Archaeology  1.  Marietta,  GA. 
1982b      Appendix  H:  Ceramic  Type  Descriptions.   In 

City    of    Phoenix:  Archaeology    of    the 

Original  Townsite,  Blocks  1  and  2,  ed.  by  J.  S. 

Cable,  S.  L.  Henry,  and  D.  E.  Doyel,  465-462. 

Soil  Systems  Publications  in  Archaeology  1. 

Marietta,  GA. 
Herman,  Bernard  L. 

1984        Multiple  Materials,  Multiple  Meanings:    The 

Fortunes  of  Thomas  Mendenhall.    Winterthur 

Portfolio  19(1):  67-86. 
Herment,  Georges 

1954        The  Pipe.  Simon  and  Schuster,  New  York. 


300   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Herrmann,  B. 

1986  Parasitologische  Untersuchung 
mittelaltlicher  Koaken.  In  Mensch  und 
Umwelt  im  Mittelalter,  ed.  by  B.  Herrmann, 
??.    Stuttgart. 

1987  Parasitologisch-epidemiologisch 
Auswertungen    mittelalterliche    Kloaken. 
Zeitschrift   Archeologie   der   Mittelalter. 

Hershberg,  T.,  ed. 

1981  Philadelphia:  Work,  Space,  Family  and 
Group  Experience  in  the  19th  Century.  Oxford 
University  Press,  Oxford. 

Hillier,  Bill,  and  Julienne  Hanson 

1988  The  Social  Logic  of  Space.  Cambridge 
University  Press,  Cambridge. 

"Historicus" 

1924        Pipes  and  Politics.    The  Living  Age  323:  98- 
100. 
Hitchcock,  A.  S. 

1971        Manual  of  the  Grasses  of  the  United  States. 
Vols.  1  and  2.     2nd  ed.,  revised  by  Agnes 
Chase.  Dover,  New  York. 
Hodder,  Ian 

1982  (Editor)  Symbolic  and  Structural 
Archaeology.  Cambridge  University  Press, 
Cambridge 

1986        Reading    the   Past:      Current   Approaches   to 
Interpretation    in    Archaeology.     Cambridge 
University  Press,  Cambridge 
1987a      The  Contribution   of  the   Long  Term.      In 
Archaeology  as  Long-Term  History,  ed.  by  Ian 
Hodder,  1-8.    Cambridge  University  Press, 
Cambridge. 
1987b      The    Contextual    Analysis    of    Symbolic 
Meanings.    In  The  Archaeology  of  Contextual 
Meanings,    ed.    by    Ian    Hodder,    1-10. 
Cambridge  University  Press,  Cambridge. 
Hodder,  Ian,  and  Clive  Orton 

1979        Spatial  Analysis  in  Archaeology.     Cambridge 
University  Press,  Cambridge. 
Hodgkin,  J.  Elliot 

1909        Women  and  Pipes.   Notes  and  Queries  10  S.  12: 
378. 
Hohenberg,  P.  M.,  and  L.  H.  Lees 

1985        The    Making    of    Urban    Europe    1000-1950. 
Harvard    University    Press,    Cambridge, 
Massachusetts. 
Honerkamp,  Nicolas  and  R.  Bruce  Council 

1984        Individual  Versus  Corporate  Adaptations  in 
Urban  Contexts.     Tennessee   Anthropologist 
9(1):  22-31. 
Horwitz,  Richard  P. 

1973        Architecture  and  Culture:  The  Meaning  of  the 
Lowell  Boarding  House.    American  Quarterly 
25(1):  64-82. 
Hubka,  Thomas 

1984        Big   House,    Little   House,    Backhouse,    Barn: 
The    Connected    Farm     Buildings    of    New 
England.    University  Press  of  New  England, 
Hanover,  New  Hampshire. 
Hughes,  Elizabeth,  and  Marion  Lester 

1981        The    Big    Book    of    Buttons.        Boyertown 
Publishing  Company,  Boyertown,  PA. 
Huizinga,  Johan 

1970        Homo  ludens:    A  Study  of  the  Play  Element  in 
Culture.  J.  &  J.  Harper,  New  York. 
Hunting,  J.  D. 

1889-90       Women  and  Tobacco.   National  Review  4:  218- 
228. 


Jack,  R.  Ian 

1986        Clay  Tobacco  Pipes  Exported  From  Scotland  to 
Australia  in  the  Nineteenth  Century:    Some 
Preliminary   Observations.      Historic    Clay 
Tobacco  Pipe  Studies  3:  125-134. 
Jackson,  M.  L. 

1958        Soil  Chemical  Analysis.     Prentice- Hall,  Inc., 
Englewood  Cliffs,  NJ. 
Jacobs,  J.  L. 

1983        Analysis  of  a  Nineteeth-Century  Military 
Midden:     The  Butler's  Barracks  Example. 
Research     Bulletin    205.       Parks    Canada, 
Ottawa. 
Janssen,  C.  R. 

1973  Local  and  Regional  Pollen  Deposition.  In 
Quaternary  Plant  Ecology,  ed.  by  H.  B.  J. 
Birks  and  R.  G.  West,  31^12.  Blackwell 
Scientific,  London. 

Johnson,  Paul  E. 

1978.       A    Shopkeeper's    Millennium:    Society    and 

Revivals  in  Rochester,  New  York  1815-1837. 

Hill  and  Wang,  New  York. 
Jones,  A.  K.  G. 

1985  Trichurid  Ova  in  Archaeological  Deposits: 
Their  Value  as  Indicators  of  Ancient  Feces.  In 
Paleobiological  Investigations:  Research 
Design,  Methods  and  Data  Analysis,  ed.  by  R. 
J.  Fieller,  D.  D.  gilbertson,  and  N.  G.  A. 
Ralph.  BAR  International  Series  266. 
Heslington. 

Jones,  Gareth  Stedman 

1974  Working-Class  Culture  and  Working  Class 
Politics  in  London,  1870-1900;  Notes  on  the 
Remaking  of  a  Working  Class.  Journal  of 
Social  History  7:  460-508. 

1977        Class  Expression  versus  Social  Control?  A 
Critique   of   Recent    Trends   in    the   Social 
History  of  'Leisure'.     History    Workshop  4: 
162-170. 
Jones,  J.  B.,  and  E.  R.  Segnit 

1971        The  Nature  of  Opal  I.     Nomenclature  and 
Constituent  Phases.    Journal  of  the  Geological 
Society  of  Australia  118:  57-69. 
Jones,  Olive  R. 

1986  Cylindrical  English  Wine  &  Beer  Bottles: 
1735-1850.  National  Historic  Parks  and  Sites 
Branch,  Environment  Canada — Parks, 
Ottawa. 

Jones,  Olive,  and  Catherine  Sullivan 

1985        The   Parks    Canada    Glass    Glossary.     Parks 
Canada,  Ottawa. 
Jones,  R.  L.,  and  A.  H.  Beavers 

1964        Variation  of  Opal  Phytolith  Content  among 
Some  Great  Soil  Groups  in  Illinois.     Soil 
Science  Society  of  American  Proceedings  28(5): 
711-712. 
Jones,  W.  Unite 

1924        The  Button  Industry.     Pitman's     Common 
Commodities  and  Industries.  Sir  Isaac  Pitman 
and  Sons,  Ltd.,  London. 
Josephson,  Hannah 

1949        The  Golden    Threads:      New   England's   Mill 
Girls  and  Magnates.    Duell,  Sloan  and  Pearce, 
New  York. 
Kaplan,  L.,  and  S.  L.  Mania 

1977        Archaeological  Botany  of  the  Apple  Creek 
Site,  Illinois.    Journal  of  Seed  Technology  2: 
40-53. 
Kapp,  R.  O. 

1969        How  to  Know  Pollen  and  Spores.    William  C. 
Brown  Co.,  Dubuque,  LA 


References  301 


Kelso,  Gerald  K. 

1986a  Pollen  Analysis  at  the  Paul  Revere  House. 
Ms.  on  file,  Office  of  Public  Archaeology, 
Boston  University,  Boston,  Massachusetts. 

1986b  Exploratory  Pollen  Analysis  at  the  Sanborn 
Site.  In  Archaeological  Investigations  at  the 
Sanborn  Site,  Boston,  Massachusetts,"  ed.  by 
L.  Boros  and  S.  Mrozowski,  A1-A27.  Ms. 
report  on  file,  Public  Archaeology  Laboratory, 
Inc.,  Providence,  Rhode  Island. 

1987a  Palynological  Exploration  of  the  Boott  Mills 
Boardinghouses.  In  Interdisciplinary 
Investigations  of  the  Boott  Mills  Lowell, 
Massachusetts.  Volume  I:  Life  in  the 
Boarding  Houses:  A  Preliminary  Report,  ed. 
by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and  Stephen  A. 
Mrozowski.,  138-145.  Cultural  Resources 
Management  Studies  18.  U.  S.  Department  of 
the  Interior,  National  Park  Service,  North 
Atlantic  Regional  Office,  Boston. 

1987b  Fort  Necessity,  Pennsylvania,  Pollen  Core 
104,  Interim  Reports.  Ms.  on  file,  Science 
Division,  U.  S.  Department  of  the  Interior, 
National  Park  Service,  Mid-Atlantic 
Regional  Office,  Philadelphia. 

1989        Pollen     Analysis     at     the     Boott     Mills 
Boardinghouses,    Lowell,    Massachusetts. 
Paper  presented  at  the  22nd  Annual  Meetings 
of  the  Society  for  Historical  Archaeology. 
Kelso,  Gerald  K.,  and  Mary  C.  Beaudry 

n.d  Pollen  Analysis  and  Urban  Land  Use:    The 

Environs  of  Scottow's  Dock  in  17th,  18th,  and 
Early  19th  Century  Boston,  Massachusetts. 
Historical  Archaeology  24(1),  forthcoming. 
Kelso,  Gerald  K.,  and  Johanna  Schoss 

1983  Exploratory  Pollen  Analysis  of  the  Bostonian 
Hotel  Site  Sediments.  In  Archaeology  of  the 
Bostonian  Hotel  Site,  by  J.  W.  Bradley,  N. 
DePaoli,  N.  Seasholes,  P.  McDowell,  G.  K. 
Kelso,  and  J.  Schoss,  67-76.  Occasional 
Publications  in  Archaeology  and  History  2. 
Massachusetts  Historical  Commission, 
Boston. 
Kenngott,  George  F. 

1912        The   Record  of  a   City:   A   Social   Survey  of 
Lowell,     Massachusetts.      Macmillan    and 
Company,  New  York. 
Ketchum,  W.  C,  Jr. 

1983        Pottery  and  Porcelain.    Knopf,  New  York. 
Klein,  R.  L.,  and  J.  W.  Geis 

1978  Biogenic  Silica  in  the  Pinaceae.  Soil  Science 
126(3):  145-156. 

Krampen,  Martin 

1979  Survey  of  Current  Work  on  the  Semiology  of 
Objects.  In  A  Semiotic  Landscape:  Procedings 
of  the  First  Congress  of  the  International 
Association  for  Semiotic  Studies,  Milan,  June 
1974  I  Panorama  simioliaue:  Actes  du  premier 
congris  de  V Association  Internationale  de 
Slmiotiaue,  Milan,  juin  1974.  ed.  by  Seymour 
Chatman,  Umberto  Eco,  and  Jean-Marie 
Klinkenburg,  158-168  Mouton,  The  Hague. 

Lampard,  E.  E. 

1983        The  Nature  of  Urbanization.   In  The  Pursuit  of 
Urban    History,  ed.   by  D.   Fraser  and  A. 
Sutcliffe,  3-53.  Edward  Arnold,  London. 


Lampard,  E.  E.,  cont'd. 

1985  Mutations  of  Cities  in  the  Industrializing  Era: 
An  Ecological  Perspective  on  Urbanization  in 
the  United  States.  In  Essays  from  the  Lowell 
Conference  on  Industrial  History,  ed.  by 
Robert  Weible,  194-249.  Museum  of  American 
Textile  History,  North  Andover, 
Massachusetts. 

Landon,  David  B. 

1987  Foodways  in  the  Lowell  Boardinghouses:  The 
Historical  and  Zooarchaeological  Evidence. 
In  Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of  the 
Boott  Mills,  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  Volume 
I:  Life  at  the  Boardinghouses:  A  Preliminary 
Report,  ed.  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and  Stephen 
A.  Mrozowski,  115-137.  Cultural  Resources 
Management  Studies  18.  U.  S.  Department  of 
the  Interior,  National  Park  Service,  North 
Atlantic  Regional  Office,  Boston. 

1987b  Zooarcheological  Analysis  of  Faunal  Remains 
from  the  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House.  In 
Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of  the  Boott 
Mills,  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  Volume  II: 
The  Kirk  Street  Agents'  House,  ed.  by  Mary  C. 
Beaudry  and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski,  130-142. 
Cultural  Resources  Management  Studies  19. 
U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior,  National 
Park  Service,  North  Atlantic  Regional 
Office,  Boston. 

1989  Documentary  and  Zooarchaeological 
Evidence  for  Urban  Foodways  in  Lowell, 
Massachusetts.  Paper  presented  at  the  22nd 
Annual  Meetings  of  the  Society  for  Historical 
Archaeology,  Baltimore,  MD. 
Landon,  David  B.,  and  Mary  C.  Beaudry 

1988  Domestic  Ideology  and  the  Boardinghouse 
System  in  Lowell,  Massachusetts.  Paper 
presented  at  the  Dublin  Seminar  for  New 
England  Folklife,  Dublin,  NH. 

Lane,  Elliott  J. 

1901        How  to  Make  Money  in  a  Country  Hotel.    The 
Caterer  Publishing  Company,  New  York. 
Laslett,  Peter,  ed. 

1972        Household     and     Family     in     Past     Time. 
Cambridge  University  Press,  New  York. 
Lawrence,  Samuel 

1846        Regulations  for  the  Boarding  Houses  of  the 
Middlesex  Company.    University  of  Lowell 
Special  Collections,  Lowell,  MA. 
Leach,  Edmund 

1982        Social    Anthropology.      Oxford   University 
Press,  New  York. 
Leary,  T.  E. 

1979        Industrial    Archaeology    and    Industrial 
Ecology.    Radical  History  Review  21:  171-182. 
Lebo,  Susan  A. 

1988        An     Archaeological    and    Bioarchaeological 
Perspective:     The    Tucker     (41DT104)    and 
Sinclair    (41DT105)    Cemeteries    of    Delta 
County,  Texas.    Institute  of  Applied  Sciences, 
University  of  North  Texas,  Denton. 
LeeDecker,  Charles  H,  Terry  H.  Klein,  Cheryl  A.  Holt, 
and  Amy  Friedlander 
1987        Nineteenth-Century      Households     and 
Consumer     Behavior     in     Wilmington, 
Delaware.    In  Consumer  Choice  in  Historical 
Archaeology,  ed.  by  Suzanne  M.  Spencer- 
Wood,  233-259.  Plenum  Press,  New  York. 


302   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Lender,  Mark  Edward,  and  James  Kirby  Martin 

1987  Drinking  in  America.  The  Free  Press,  New 
York. 

Leone,  Mark  P. 

1977  The  New  Mormon  Temple  in  Washington, 
D.C.  In  Historical  Archaeology  and  the 
Importance  of  Material  Things,  ed.  by  Leland 
Ferguson,  43-61.  Special  Publication  1. 
Published  for  the  Society  for  Historical 
Archaeology  by  Braun-Brumfield,Inc,  Ann 
Arbor. 
1984  Interpreting  Ideology  in  Historical 
Archaeology:  Using  the  Rules  of  Perspective 
in  the  William  Paca  Garden  in  Annapolis, 
Maryland.  In  Ideology,  Power,  and 
Prehistory,  ed.  by  Daniel  Miller  and 
Christopher  Tilley,  25-35.  Cambridge 
University  Press,  Cambridge. 

1986  Symbolic,  Structural  and  Critical 
Archaeology.  In  American  Archaeology  Past 
and  Future:  A  Celebration  of  the  Society  for 
American  Archaeology  1935-1985,  ed.  by 
David  J.  Meltzer,  Don  D.  Fowler,  and  Jeremy 
Sabloff,  413-438.  Smithsonian  Institution 
Press,  Washington,  D.C. 

1987  Rule  by  Ostentation:  The  Relationship 
Between  Space  and  Sight  in  Eighteenth- 
Century  Landscape  Architecture  in  the 
Chesapeake  Region  of  Maryland.  In  Method 
and  Theory  for  Activity  Area  Research:  An 
Ethnoarchaeological  Approach,  ed.  by  Susan 
Kent,  604—633.  Columbia  University  Press, 
New  York. 

1988a  The  Relationship  Between  Archaeological 
Data  and  the  Documentary  Record:  18th 
Century  Gardens  in  Annapolis,  Maryland. 
Historical  Archaeology  22(1):  29-35. 

1988b  The  Georgian  Order  as  the  Order  of  Merchant 
Capitalism  in  Annapolis,  Maryland.  In  The 
Recovery      of      Meaning:  Historical 

Archaeology  in  the  Eastern  United  States,  ed. 
by  Mark  P.  Leone  and  Parker  B.  Potter,  Jr., 
235-261.  Smithsonian  Institution  Press, 
Washington,  D.C. 

1989        Issues  in  Historic  Landscapes  and  Gardens. 
Historical  Archaeology  23(1):  45-47. 
Leone,  Mark  P.,  and  Constance  A.  Crosby 

1987  Epilogue:  Middle-Range  Theory  in  Historical 
Archaeology.  In  Consumer  Choice  in 
Historical  Archaeology,  ed.  by  Suzanne  M. 
Spencer- Wood, .397-411.  Plenum  Press,  New 
York. 
Leone,  Mark  P.,  Elizabeth  Kryder-Reid,  Julie  H. 
Ernstein,  and  Paul  A.  Shackel 

1989        Power  Gardens  of  Annapolis.    Archaeology 
42(2):  35-39,  74-75. 
Leone,  Mark  P.,  and  Parker  B.  Potter,  Jr. 

1988a      Introduction:  Issues     in     Historical 

Archaeology.  In  The  Recovery  of  Meaning: 
Historical  Archaeology  in  the  Eastern  United 
States,  ed.  by  Mark  P.Leone  and  Parker  B. 
Potter,  Jr.,  1-22.  Smithsonian  Institution 
Press,  Washington,  D.C. 

1988b      (Editors)      The     Recovery     of     Meaning: 

Historical  Archaeology  in  the  Eastern  United 

States.       Smithsonian    Institution    Press, 

Washington,  D.C. 

Leone,  Mark  P.,  Parker  B.  Potter,  Jr.,  and  Paul  A.  Shackel 

1987  Toward  a  Critical  Archaeology.  Current 
Anthropology  28(3):  283-292. 


Levenstein,  Harvey 

1980  The  New  England  Kitchen  and  the  Origins  of 
Modern  American  Eating  Habits.  American 
Quarterly  32(4):  367-386. 

Levin,  Jed 

1989  Machinists,  Mill  Hands,  and  Magnates:  The 
Archaeology  of  Class  Development.  Paper 
presented  at  the  22nd  Annual  Meetings  of  the 
Society  for  Historical  Archaeology, 
Baltimore,  MD. 

Levine,  Harry  Gene 

1979  Colonial  and  Nineteenth  Century  Thoughts 
About  Liquor  as  a  Cause  of  Crime  and 
Accidents.  Paper  presented  at  the  Annual 
Meeting  of  the  Society  for  the  Study  of  Social 
Problems,  Chicago,  Illinois. 

Lewin,  Roger 

1980  Evolutionary  Theory  Under  Fire.  Science 
210(4472):  883-887. 

Lewis,  Rhoda  Owen 

1985  Phytolith  analysis  from  the  McKean  Site, 
Wyoming.  In  McKean/Middle  Plains 
Archaic:  Current  Research,  ed.  by  Marcel 
Kornfeld  and  Lawrence  C.  Todd,  45-50. 
Occasional  Papers  on  Wyoming  Archaeology 
4.  University  of  Wyoming,  Laramie. 
1987  Opal  Phytolith  Studies  from  the  Horner  Site, 
Wyoming.  In  The  Horner  Site:  The  Type  Site 
of  the  Cody  Cultural  Complex,  ed.  by  George 
C.  Frison  and  Lawrence  C.  Todd,  451-459. 
Academic  Press,  Orlando. 
Lief,  Alfred 

1965        A       Close-Up    of    Closures:       History    and 
Progress.     Glass  Container  Manufacturers 
Institute,  New  York. 
Limbrey,  Susan 

1975        Soil    Science   and   Archaeology.      Academic 
Press,  New  York. 
Lindsay,  W.  L. 

1979        Chemical  Equilibria  in  Soils.    John  Wiley  and 
Sons,  New  York. 
Little,  W.  L. 

1969        Staffordshire     Blue:  Underglaze     Blue 

Transfer-printed  Earthenware.    Crown  Books, 
New  York. 
Lofland,  Lyn  H. 

1973        A    World  of  Strangers:     Order  and  Action  in 
Public  Space.   Basic  Books,  New  York. 
Lofstrom,  E.,  J.  P.  Tordorff ,  and  Douglas  C.  George 

1982        A  Seriation  of  Historic  Earthenwares  in  the 
Midwest,     1780-1870.        The     Minnesota 
Archaeologist  41(1):  3-29. 
Loftus,  W.  R. 

1881         "The  Tobacconist."     A  Practical  Guide  to  the 
Retail  Tobacco  Trade  in  All  It's  Branches.    W. 
R.  Loftus,  London. 
Long,  William  W. 

n.d.         Account  Book.    Ms.  on  file,  Arents  Tobacco 
Collection,  New  York  Public  Library. 
Lorrain,  Dessamae 

1968        An    Archaeologist's   Guide    to   Nineteenth 
Century    American    Glass.        Historical 
Archaeology  2:  35-44. 
Lowell  City  Directory 

Lowell  City  Directories,  various  titles  and 
publishers  on  file  at  the  Pollard  Memorial 
Library,  Lowell,  Massachusetts. 
Lowell  City  Documents 

1890        City    Documents    of    the    City    of    Lowell. 

Lowell,  MA. 
1895        City    Documents    of    the    City    of    Lowell. 
Lowell,  MA. 


References  303 


Lowell  Morning  Mail 

1900        Obituary  of  Enoch  H.  Hutchins,  December  31, 
1900. 
Lowenthal,  David 

1985        The  Past  is  a  Foreign  Country.     Cambridge 
University  Press,  Cambridge. 
Lubar,  Steven  David 

1983  Corporate  and  Urban  Contexts  of  Textile 
Technology  in  Nineteenth  Century  Lowell, 
Massachusetts:  A  Study  of  the  Social  Nature 
of  Technological  Knowledge.  Ph.D  diss., 
University  of  Chicago. 
Luscomb,  Sally  C. 

1967        The    Collector's    Encyclopedia    of    Buttons. 
Bonanza  Books,  New  York. 
Lyman,  R.  Lee 

1977  Analysis  of  Historic  Faunal  Remains. 
Historical  Archaeology    11:  67-73. 

1987  On  Zooarchaeological  Measures  of 
Socioeconomic  Position  and  Cost-Efficient 
Meat  Purchases.  Historical  Archaeology 
21(1):  58-66. 

McDougall,  Duncan,  and  Company 

n.d.  Irish  Price  List..    Not  paginated.    (Reprinted 

in  Historic  Clay  Tobacco  Pipe  Studies  1:  45- 

46.) 
McGuire,  Randall  H. 

1988  Dialogues  with  the  Dead:  Ideology  and  the 
Cemetery.  In  The  Recovery  of  Meaning: 
Historical  Archaeology  in  the  Eastern  United 
States,  ed.  by  Mark  P.  Leone  and  Parker  B. 
Potter,  Jr.,  435-480.  Smithsonian  Institution 
Press,  Washington,  D.C. 

McKearin,  George  L,  and  Helen  McKearin 

1941  American  Glass.  Crown  Publishers,  New 
York. 

McMurry,  Sally 

1985  City  Parlor,  Country  Sitting  Room:  Rural 
Vernacular  Design  and  the  American  Parlor, 
1840-1900.  Winterthur  Portfolio  20(4):  261- 
280. 

MacPhail,  R. 

1981  Soil  and  Botanical  Studies  of  the  'Dark 
Earth.'  In  The  Environment  of  Man:  The  Iron 
Age  to  the  Anglo-Saxon  Period,  309-331. 
British  Archaeological  Reports  87.    Oxford. 

McReynolds,  Mary  Jane 

1981  Archeological  Investigations  at  the  Laredo 
Cemetery  Site  (41WB22),  Webb  County, 
Texas.  Reports  of  Investigations  1 1 .  Prewitt 
and  Associates,  Inc.  Consulting  Archeologists, 
Austin. 

Machen,  Arthur  [Leolinus  Siluriensis] 

1884  The  Anatomy  of  Tobacco  or  Smoking 
Methodised,  Divided,  and  Considered  After  a 
New  Fashion.  George  Redway,  London. 

Mahlstedt,  Thomas,  and  Douglas  C.  George 

1988  Boott  Cotton  Mills,  Lowell  National 
Historical  Park,  Lowell,  Massachusetts: 
Archeological  Data  Section  of  the  Historic 
Structures  Report.  Draft  report  submitted  to 
National  Park  Service,  Denver  Service 
Center,  Denver. 

Majewski,  Teresita,  and  Michael  J.  O'Brien 

1987  The  Use  and  Misuse  of  Nineteenth-Century 
English  and  American  Ceramics  in 
Archaeological  Analysis.  In  Advances  in 
Archaeological  Method  and  Theory  Volume 
11,  ed.  by  Michael  R.  Schiffer,  97-209. 
Academic  Press,  Orlando. 


Malone,  Dumas,  ed. 
1946        Dictionary  of  American  Biography.    Charles 

Scribner's  Sons,  New  York. 
Marcus,  Stephen 

1964        The  Other  Victorians:     A  Study  of  Sexuality 

and  Pornography  in  Mid-Nineteenth-Century 

England.  W.  W.  Norton,  New  York. 
Marston,  Sallie  A. 

1987        Contested  Territory:     An  Ethnic  Parade  as 

Symbolic  Resistance.    Paper  presented  at  the 

8th  Annual  Lowell  Conference  on  Industrial 

History,  Lowell,  MA. 
Massachusetts  Bureau  of  Statistics  of  Labor 

1871        Second   Annual   Report   of  the  Bureau  of 

Statistics   of   Labor.      Wright   and    Potter, 

Boston. 
1875        Sixth    Annual    Report    of    the    Bureau    of 

Statistics   of   Labor.      Wright    and    Potter, 

Boston. 
1882        Thirteenth  Annual  Report  of  the  Bureau  of 

Statistics  of  Labor.  Rand  and  Avery,  Boston. 
1884        Fifteenth  Annual  Report  of  the  Bureau  of 

Statistics   of   Labor.      Wright    and    Potter, 

Boston. 
1889        Twentieth  Annual  Report  of  the  Bureau  of 

Statistics   of   Labor.      Wright   and    Potter, 

Boston. 
Massachusetts  House  of  Representatives 

1845        Massachusetts    House    of    Representatives 

Docket  #50. 
Meacham,  Standish 

1977        A   Life  Apart:     The  English   Working  Class, 

1890-1914.       Harvard    University    Press, 

Cambridge,  MA. 
Mehringer,  P.  J.,  Jr. 

1967        Pollen  Analysis  of  the  Tule  Springs  Area, 

Nevada.    In  Pleistocene  Studies  in  Southern 

Nevada,  ed.  by  H.  M.  Wormington  and  D. 

Ellis,  120-200.    Anthropological    Papers  13. 

Nevada  State  Museum,  Carson  City. 
Mendelson,  Jack  H,  and  Nancy  K.  Mello 

1985  Alcohol:  Use  and  Abuse  in  America.  Little, 
Brown  and  Company,  Boston. 

Mercer,  Colin 

1986  Complicit  Pleasures.  In  Popular  Culture  and 
Social  Relations,  ed.  by  Tony  Bennett,  Colin 
Mercer,  and  Janet  Woolacott,  50-68.  Open 
University  Press,  Milton  Keynes. 

Middlesex  County  Deeds 

1868  Book  64.  Middlesex  Registry  of  Deeds,  North 
Middlesex  Courthouse,  Lowell,  MA. 

1869  Book  67.  Middlesex  Registry  of  Deeds,  North 
Middlesex  Courthouse,  Lowell,  MA. 

1870  Book  75.  Middlesex  Registry  of  Deeds,  North 
Middlesex  Courthouse,  Lowell,  MA. 

1899        Book  314.     Middlesex  Registry  of  Deeds, 
North  Middlesex  Courthouse,  Lowell,  MA. 
Middlesex  Probate 

1811  Probate  Docket  17070.  Probate  of  Amassa 
Peabody.  Middlesex  Registry  of  Probate, 
South  Middlesex  Courthouse,  Cambridge, 
MA. 

1825  Probate  Docket  17071.  Guardianship  of 
Amanda  Peabody.  Middlesex  Registry  of 
Probate,  South  Middlesex  Courthouse, 
Cambridge,  MA. 

1858  Probate  Docket  #34177.  Probate  of  Simeon  L. 
Hildreth.  Middlesex  Registry  Of  Probate, 
South  Middlesex  Courthouse,  Cambridge, 
MA. 


304   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Middlesex  Probate,  cont'd. 

1884  Probate  Docket  17916.  Probate  of  Amanda  M. 
Fox.  Middlesex  Registry  of  Probate,  South 
Middlesex  Courthouse,  Cambridge,  MA. 
1891  Probate  Docket  30206.  Probate  of  Helen 
Barker.  Middlesex  Registry  of  Probate,  South 
Middlesex  Courthouse,  Cambridge,  MA. 
Miles,  Henry  A. 

1846        Lowell  As  It  Was,  and  As  It  Is.    1972  reprint 
edition.  Arno  Press,  New  York. 
Miles,  S.  R.,  and  P.  C.  Singleton 

1975        Vegetative   History  of  Cinnabar  Park  in 
Medicine  Bow  National  Forest,  Wyoming. 
Soil  Science  Society  of  American  Proceedings 
39:  1204-1208. 
Miller,  Daniel 

1987        Material    Culture   and   Mass    Consumption. 
Basil  Blackwood,  Oxford. 
Miller,  George  L. 

1974        Tenant  Farmer's  Tableware:      Nineteenth- 
Century   Ceramics   from   Tabbs   Purchase. 
Maryland  Historical  Magazine  69:  197-210. 
1980        Classification  and  Economic  Scaling  of  19th 
Century  Ceramics.     Historical    Archaeology 
14:1-^0. 
1989        Revised  Index  Values  for  Economic  Scaling  of 
19th  Century  Ceramics.    Ms.  distributed  by 
author. 
Miller,  George  L.  and  Catherine  Sullivan 

1984        Machine-Made  Containers  and  the  End  of 
Production     for     Mouth-Blown     Bottles. 
Historical  Archaeology  18(2):  83-96. 
Miller,  J.  Jefferson,  and  Lyle,  M.  Stone 

1970  Eighteenth-Century  Ceramics  from  Fort 
Michilimackinac:  A  Study  in  Historical 
Archaeology.  Smithsonian  Studies  in  History 
and  Technology  4.  Smithsonian  Institution 
Press,  Washington,  D.C. 
Modell,  John,  and  Tamara  K.  Hareven 

1977  Urbanization  and  the  Malleable  Household: 
An  Examination  of  Boarding  and  Lodging  in 
American  Families.  In  Family  and  Kin  in 
Urban  Communities,  1700-1930,  ed.  by  Tamara 
K.  Hareven,  164-186.  New  Viewpoints,  New 
York. 
Montgomery,  David 

1980        To  Study  the  People:   The  American  Working 
Class.   Labor  History  21:  485-512. 
Montgomery  Ward  &  Co. 

1895  Catalog  and  Buyers'  Guide,  No.  57,  Spring  and 
Summer.  (1969  reprint.)  Dover  Publications, 
Inc.,  New  York. 
1922  Golden  Jubilee,  Catalogue  No.  97,  Fall  & 
Winter  1922-23.  (1969  reprint).  HC 
Publishers,  Inc.,  New  York 
Moran,  Geoffrey  P.,  Edward  F.  Zimmer,  and  Anne  E. 
Yentsch 

1982  Archeological  Investigations  at  the  Narbonne 
House,  Salem  Maritime  National  Historic 
Site,  Massachusetts.  Cultural  Resources 
Management  Study  6.  U.S.  Department  of  the 
Interior,  National  Park  Service,  North 
Atlantic  Regional  Office,  Boston. 

Moseley,  B.  D. 

1913        The  Clay  Pipes  of  Gentility.      Notes    and 
Queries  11  S.  VIII:  257. 
Mrozowski,  Stephen  A. 

1983  Examining  the  Urban  Environment  through 
the  Analysis  of  Floral  Remains.  The 
Newsletter  of  the  Conference  on  New  England 
Archaeology  3:  46-52. 


Mrozowski,  Stephen  A.,  cont'd. 

1984  Prospect  and  Perspective  on  an  Archaeology  of 
the  Household.  Man  in  the  Northeast  27:  31- 
49. 

1987a  An  Analysis  of  Soils  from  the  Kirk  Street 
Agents'  House.  In  Interdisciplinary 
Investigations  of  the  Boott  Mills  Lowell, 
Massachusetts  Volume  II:  The  Kirk  Street 
Agent's  House,  ed.  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry  and 
Stephen  A.  Mrozowski.,  116-118.  Cultural 
Resources  Management  Studies  19.  National 
Park  Service  North  Atlantic  Regional  Office, 
Boston. 

1987b  The  Ethnoarchaeology  of  Urban  Gardening. 
Ph.d.  diss.,  Department  of  Anthropology, 
Brown  University,  Providence,  RI. 

1988  For  Gentlemen  of  Capacity  and  Leisure:  The 
Archaeology  of  Colonial  Newspapers.  In 
Documentary  Archaeology  in  the  New  World, 
ed.  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry,  184-191.  Cambridge 
University  Press,  Cambridge. 

Mrozowski,  Stephen  A.,  and  Mary  C.  Beaudry 

1989  Archaeology  and  the  Landscape  of  Corporate 
Ideology.  In  Earth  Patterns:  Archaeology  of 
Early  American  and  Ancient  Gardens  and 
Landscapes,  ed.  by  William  M.  Kelso. 
University  Press  of  Virginia,  Charlottesville, 
forthcoming. 

Mrozowski,  S.  A.,  E.  L.  Bell,  M.  C.  Beaudry,  D.  B.  Landon, 
and  G.  K.  Kelso 
1989        Living  on  the  Boott:    Health  and  Well  Being 
in   a   Boardinghouse   Population.      World 
Archaeology  21(2);  298-319. 

Mrozowski,  S.  A.,  and  G.  K.  Kelso 

1987  Palynology  and  Archeobotany  of  the  Lowell 
Boardinghouse  Site.  In  Interdisciplinary 
Investigations  of  the  Boott  Mills,  Lowell, 
Massachusetts.  Volume  I:  Life  at  the 
Boardinghouses,  A  Preliminary  Report,  ed.  by 
Mary  C.  Beaudry  and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski, 
139-151.  Cultural  Resources  Management 
Studies  18.  U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior, 
National  Park  Service,  North  Atlantic 
Regional  Office,  Boston. 

Mulholland,  Susan 

1983  Extraction  of  Opal  Phytoliths  from  Sediment 
Samples.  The  Phytolitharien  Newsletter 
3(2):  4-6. 
1986  Classification  of  Grass  Silica  Phytoliths.  In 
Plant  Opal  Phytolith  Analysis  in 
Archaeology  and  Paleoecology,  ed.  by  Irwin 
Rovner,  41-51.  Occasional  Papers  No.  1  of  The 
Phytolitharien.  North  Carolina  State 
University,  Raleigh. 

Munsey,  Cecil 

1970  The  Illustrated  Guide  to  Collecting  Bottles. 
Hawthorn  Books,  Inc.,  New  York. 

Murrman,  R.  P.,  and  F.  R.  Koutz 

1972  Special  Report  No.  171.  U.  S.  Army  Cold 
Regions  Research  and  Engineering  Laboratory, 
Hanover. 

The  National  Society  of  Colonial  Dames  of  America 
1986  Footnotes  on  Footwear  (17th,  18th  and  19th 
Centuries).  Prepared  by  The  National 
Historical  Activities  Committee  of  The 
National  Society  of  Colonial  Dames  of 
America. 


References  305 


Needleman,  H.  L.,  C.  Gunnoe,  A.  Leviton,  R.  Reed,  H. 
Peresie,  C.  Maher,  and  P.  Barrett 

1979  Deficits  in  Psychologic  and  Classroom 
Performance  of  Children  with  Elevated 
Dentine  Lead  Levels.  The  New  England 
journal  of  Medicine  300(13):  689-696. 

Newcomb,  R.,  Jr. 

1947        Ceramic  Whitewares.    Pitman,  New  York. 
Noel  Hume,  Audrey 

1963        Clay  Tobacco  Pipe  Dating  in  the  Light  of 
Recent   Excavations.      Quarterly    Bulletin, 
Archeological  Society  of  Virginia   18(2):   22- 
25. 
Noel  Hume,  Ivor 

1969        A   Guide   to   Artifacts   of  Colonial   America. 
Alfred  A.  Knopf,  New  York. 
Office  of  Solid  Waste 

1980  Hazardous  Waste  Land  Treatment.  SW-874. 
Olsen,  Stanley  J. 

1963  Dating  Early  Plain  Buttons  by  Their  Form. 
American  Antiquity  28(4):  551-554. 

1964  Mammal  Remains  from  Archaeological  Sites. 
Papers  of  the  Peabody  Museum  of 
Archaeology  and  Ethnology  56(1).  Harvard 
University,  Cambridge,  MA. 

1968  Fish,  Amphibian  and  Reptile  Remains  from 
Archaeological  Sites.  Papers  of  the  Peabody 
Museum  of  Archaeology  and  Ethnology  56(2). 
Harvard  University,  Cambridge,  MA. 

Omwake,  H.  Geiger 

1965  Analysis  of  19th  Century  White  Kaolin  Pipe 
Fragments  From  the  Mero  Site,  Door  County, 
Wisconsin.  The  Wisconsin  Archaeologist,  n.s., 
46(2):  125-139. 

Orser,  Charles  E.,  Jr. 

1988  Toward  a  Theory  of  Power  for  Historical 
Archaeology:  Plantations  and  Space.  In  The 
Recovery      of      Meaning:  Historical 

Archaeology  in  the  Eastern  United  States,  ed. 
by  Mark  P.Leone  and  Parker  B.  Potter,  Jr., 
313-343.  Smithsonian  Institution  Press, 
Washington,  D.C. 

Oswald,  Adrian 

1951  English  Clay  Tobacco  Pipes.  The 
Archaeological  News  Letter    3(10):  153-159. 

Otto,  John  Solomon 

1984  Cannon's  Point  Plantation,  1794-1860:  Living 
Conditions  and  Status  Patterns  in  the  Old 
South.  Academic  Press,  Orlando. 

Page,  A.  L.,  ed. 

1982  Methods  of  Soil  Analysis  Part  2:  Chemical 
and  Microbiological  Properties.  2nd  edn.  Soil 
Science  Society  of  America,  Inc.,  and  the 
American  Society  of  Agronomy,  Inc.,  Madison, 
WI. 

Park,  Robert 

1969  The  City:  Suggestions  for  the  Investigations 
of  Human  Behavior  in  the  Urban 
Environment.  In  Classic  Essays  on  the  Culture 
of  Cities,  ed.  by  Richard  Sennett,  91-130. 
(Originally  published  1916.)  Prentice-Hall, 
Englewood  Cliffs,  NJ. 

Paynter,  Robert 

1982  Models  of  Spatial  Inequality.  Academic 
Press,  New  York. 

1988  Steps  to  an  Archaeology  of  Capitalism: 
Material  Change  and  Class  Analysis.  In  The 
Recovery      of      Meaning:  Historical 

Archaeology  in  the  Eastern  United  States,  ed. 
by  Mark  P.  Leone  and  Parker  B.  Potter,  Jr., 
407-433.  Smithsonian  Institution  Press, 
Washington,  D.C. 


Pearsall,  Deborah  M. 

1982  Phytolith  Analysi:  Applications  of  a  New 
Paleoethnobotanical  Technique  in 
Archaeology.  American  Anthropologist  84: 
862-871. 

Peel,  Mark 

1986  On  the  Margins:  Lodgers  and  Boarders  in 
Boston,  1860-1900.  Journal  of  American 
History  72(4):  813-834. 

People's  Document 

1860  A  Review  of  the  Report  of  the  Mayor  and 
Alderman  Upon  a  Petition  For  the 
Enforcement  of  the  Act  Relating  to  the  Illegal 
Sale  of  Intoxicating  Liquors.  Stone  &  Huse, 
Lowell,  MA. 
Peterson,  Arthur  G. 

1968        400  Trademarks  on   Glass   With   Alphabetical 
Index.  J0-D  Books,  Stamford,CT. 
Pfeiffer,  Michael  A. 

1978        The  Utility  of  Clay  Tobacco  Pipes  and  Stems 
as  a  Time  Marker  in  the  Pacific  Northwest. 
Paper    presented    at    the    31st    Northwest 
Anthropological  Conference,  Pullman,  WA. 
1982a      The      Clay      Pipes.  In      Kanaka 

Village/Vancouver  Barracks  1975,  113-127. 
Reports  in  Highway  Archaeology  7.  Office  of 
Public  Archaeology,  Institute  for 
Environmental  Studies,  University  of 
Washington,  Seattle. 
1982b  Request  for  Information.  Historic  Clay 
Tobacco  Pipe  Studies  2:  74. 
Pieper,  Joseph 

1952        Leisure,  the  Basis  of  Culture.    Pantheon,  New 
York. 
Piperno,  Dolores 

1984  A  Comparison  and  Differentiation  of 
Phytoliths  from  Maize  and  Wild  Grasses: 
Use  of  Morphological  Criteria.  American 
Antiquity  49(2):  3610383. 

1987  Phytolith  Analysis:  An  Archaeological  and 
Geological  Perspective.  Academic  Press, 
Orlando. 

1988  Phytolith  Analysis.  In  Morven  Interim 
Report  2,  ed.  by  Naomi  F.  Miller  and  Anne 
Yentsch,  50-55. 

Pittman,  William  E.,  and  George  L.  Miller 

1987        Laboratory  Manual.    Office  of  Archaeological 

Excavation,      Colonial      Williamsburg 

Foundation,  Williamsburg,  VA. 
Poirier,  Frank  E. 

1987  Understanding  Human  Evolution.  Prentice- 
Hall,  Englewood  Cliffs,  NJ. 

Pope,  Peter 

1988  Clay  Tobacco  Pipes  from  Ferryland: 
Archaeological  Analysis  and  Historical 
Interpretation.  Ms.  on  file,  Department  of 
History,  Memorial  University  of 
Newfoundland,  St.  Johns. 

Post,  Emily 

1940        The     Etiquette     of     Smoking.         Good 
Housekeeping   111  (September  1940):  37. 
Potter,  Parker  B.,  Jr. 

1989  Reconstructing  Local  History.  Paper 
presented  at  the  22nd  Annual  Meetings  of  the 
Society  for  Historical  Archaeology, 
Baltimore,  MD. 

Praetzellis,  Adrian,  Mary  Praetzellis 

1989a  Archaeological  Biography:  A  Method  for 
Interpreting  Women's  History.  Paper 
presented  at  the  22nd  Annual  Meetings  of  the 
Society  for  Historical  Archaeology. 


306   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Praetzellis,  Adrian,  Mary  Praetzellis,  cont'd. 

1989b  Carriage  Maker  to  Undertaker,  or,  The 
Redmonds  Clean  House:  Archaeology  of  an 
1870s  Family.  Report  prepared  for  California 
Days,  Inc.,  by  M.  &  A.  Praetzellis  Historical 
Archaeology/Local  History,  Santa  Rosa,  CA. 

Praetzellis,    Adrian,    Mary    Praetzellis,    and    Marley 
Brown  III 
1980        (Editors)    The    Archaeology   of   the    Golden 
Eagle  Site.    Anthropological  Studies  Center, 
Sonoma  State  University,  Rohnert  Park,  CA. 

1987  Artifacts  as  Symbols  of  Identity:  An  Example 
from  Sacramento's  Gold  Rush  Era  Chinese 
Community.  In  Living  in  Cities:  Current 
Research  in  Urban  Archaeology,  ed.  by 
Edward  Staski,  38—47.  Special  Publication 
Series  5.  Published  for  Society  for  Historical 
Archaeology  by  Braun-Brumfield,  Inc.,  Ann 
Arbor. 

1988  What  Happeneed  to  the  Silent  Majority? 
Research  Strategies  for  Studying  Dominant 
Group  Material  Culture  in  Late  Nineteenth- 
Century  California.  In  Documentary 
Archaeology  in  the  New  World,  ed.  by  Mary 
C.  Beaudry,  192-202.  Cambridge  University 
Press,  Cambridge. 

Prideaux,  W.  F. 

1913        The  Clay   Pipes  of  Gentility.      Notes    and 
Queries  11  S.  VIII:  256-257. 
Pritchett,  William,  and  Richard  Fisher 

1987  Properties  and  Management  of  Forest  Soils. 
John  Wiley  and  Sons,  New  York. 

Prown,  Jules  David 

1988  Mind  in  Matter:  An  Introduction  to  Material 
Culture  Theory  and  Method.  In  Material  Life 
in  America,  1600-1860,  ed.  by  Robert  Blair  St. 
George,  17-37.  Northeastern  University 
Press,  Boston. 

Rathje,  William  L. 

1971        The   Origin   and   Development  of  Classic 
Lowland   Maya    Civilization.      American 
Antiquity  36(3):  275-285. 
Raven,  Peter  H,  Brent  Berlin,  and  Dennis  E.  Breedlove 
1971        The  Origins  of  Taxonomy.   Science  174:  1210- 
1214. 
Reade,  Captain  Philip 

1892        Origins    and    Genealogy    of    the    Hildreth 
Family  of  Lowell,  Massachusetts.     Privately 
published. 
Reichel-Dolmatoff,    Gerardo,    and    Alicia    Reichel- 
Dolmatoff 
1961        The    People    of    Aritama:        The    Cultural 
Personality  of  a  Colombian  Mestizo  Village. 
The  University  of  Chicago  Press,  Chicago. 
Reid,  C.  S. 

1976        Clay  Pipes  in  the  Upper  Great  Lakes:    The 
Ermatinger     Assemblage.         Northeast 
Historical  Archaeology  5(1-2):   1-11. 
Reinhard,  K.  J.,  S.  A.  Mrozowski,  and  K.  A.  Orloski 

1986  Privies,  Pollen,  Parasites  and  Seeds:  A 
Biological  Nexus  in  Historical  Archaeology. 
MASCA  Journal  4:  31-36. 
Reinhard,  K.  J.,  U.  E.  Confalonieri,  B.  Herrmann,  L.  F. 
Ferreira,  and  A.  J.  G.  Araujo 
1988  Recovery  of  Parasite  Remains  from  Coprolites 
and  Latrines:  Aspects  of  Paleoparasitological 
Technique.  Homo  37: 217-239. 


Robbins,  John 

1979  Historic  Structure  Report,  Architectural 
Data,  Boott  Cotton  Mills  and  Massachusetts 
Cotton  Mills  Agents  Houses,  67  and  63  Kirk 
Street,  Lowell  National  Historical  Park, 
Lowell,  Middlesex  County,  Massachusetts. 
Draft  typescript.  U.  S.  Department  of  the 
Interior,  National  Park  Service,  Denver 
Service  Center,  Denver. 

Robinson,  Harriet  H. 

1898  Loom  and  Spindle:  Or  Life  Among  the  Early 
Mill  Girls.  (1976  reprint).  Press  Pacifica, 
Kailua,  HI. 

Rockman,  Diana,  Wendy  Harris,  and  Jed  Levin 

1983  The  Archaeological  Investigation  of  the  Telco 
Block,  South  Street  Historic  District,  New 
York,  New  York.  Soil  Systems,  Inc., 
Marrietta,  Georgia. 

Rojek,  Chris 

1989  Leisure  and  'The  Ruins  of  the  Bourgeois 
World.'  In  Leisure  for  Leisure:  Critical 
Essays,  ed.  by  Chris  Rojek,  92-112.  Routledge, 
New  York. 

Rose,  Jerome  C,  and  Lawrence  Gene  Santeford 

1985  Burial  Descriptions.  In  Gone  to  a  Better  Land: 
A  Biohistory  of  a  Rural  Black  Cemetery  in 
the  Post-Reconstruction  South,  ed.  by  Jerome 
C.  Rose,  38-129.  Arkansas  Archeological 
Survey  Research  Series  No.  25.    Fayetteville. 

Rosenzweig,  Roy 

1983  Eight  Hours  for  What  We  Will:  Workers  and 
Leisure  in  an  Industrial  City,  1870-1920. 
Cambridge  University  Press,  Cambridge. 

Rovner,  Irwin 

1983  Plant  Opal  Phytolith  Analysis:  Major 
Advances  in  Archaeobotanical  Research.  In 
Advances  in  Archaeological  Method  and 
Theory  Volume  6,  ed.  by  Michael  B.  Schiffer. 
Academic  Press,  New  York. 

1986  Downward  Percolation  of  Phytoliths  in 
Stable  Soils:  A  Non-Issue.  In  Plant  Opal 
Phytolith  Analysis  in  Archaeology  and 
Paleoecology,  ed.  by  Irwin  Rovner,  23-28. 
Occasional  Papers  No.  1  of  The 
Phytolitharien.  North  Carolina  State 
University,  Raleigh. 

Russell,  Howard  S. 

1976        A   Long,  Deep  Furrow:     Three  Centuries  of 
Farming  in  New  England.    University  Press  of 
New  England,  Hanover,  NH. 
Sabloff,  J.  A.,  and  William  L.  Rathje 

1975        The    Rise    of    a    Maya    Merchant    Class. 
Scientific  American   233:  72-82. 
St.  George,  Robert  Blair 

1979  The  Wrought  Covenant:  Source  Material  for 
the  Study  of  Craftsmen  and  Community  in 
Southeastern  New  England  1620-1700. 
Brockton  Art  Center-Fuller  Memorial, 
Brockton,  MA. 
"St.  Swithin" 

1909        Women  and  Pipes.    Notes  and  Queries  10  S. 
XII:  378. 
Samson,  O.  W. 

1960  The  Geography  of  Pipe  Smoking. 
Geographical  Magazine  33(4):  217-230. 


References  307 


Sanborn  Fire  Insurance  Maps 

1983        The      Sanborn      Fire      Insurance      Maps. 

Massachusetts,    Reel    23,    Lowell    (3769). 

(Microfilm  edition  cf:    Lowell  Massachusetts 

1892.  Sheet  11.  Sanborn  Perris  Map  Co.,  Ltd., 

New  York).    Chadwyck-Healey,  Teaneck,  NJ. 
Schiffer,  Michael  B. 

1972        Archaeological    Context    and    Systematic 

Context.   American  Antiquity  37:  156-165. 
1983        Toward    the    Identification    of    Formation 

Processes.   American  Antiquity  48(4):  675-706. 
1977        Toward  a  Unified  Science  of  the  Cultural 

Past.     In  Research    Strategies    in    Historical 

Archaeology,  ed.  by  Stanley   South,    13-40. 

Academic  Press,  New  York. 
1988        The   Structure   of   Archaeological   Theory. 

American  Antiquity  53(3):   461-485. 
Schiffer,  Michael  B.,  Theodore  E.  Downing  ,  and  Michael 

McCarthy 
1981        Waste       Not,       Want       Not:  An 

Ethnoarchaeological  Study  of  Reuse  in  Tuscon, 

Arizona.    In  Modern  Material  Culture:      The 

Archaeology  of  Us,  ed.  by  R.  A.Gould  and  M. 

B.  Schiffer,  67-85.     Academic  Press,  New 

York. 
Schmid,  Elisabeth 

1972        An    Atlas    of   Animal    Bones.       Elsevier 

Publishing  Co.,  Amsterdam. 
Schmidt,  Peter  R.,  and  Stephen  A.  Mrozowski 

1983        History,  Smugglers,  Change,  and  Shipwrecks. 

In  Shipwreck   Anthropology,  ed.  by  Richard 

A.  Gould,  143-171.  University  of  New  Mexico 

Press,  Albuquerque. 
Schmitt,  N.,  J.  J.  Philion,  A.  A.  Larson,  M.  Harnadek,  and 

A.  J.  Lynch 

1979  Surface  Soil  as  a  Potential  Source  of  Lead 
Exposure  for  Young  Children.  CMA  journal 
121:1474-1478. 

Schuyler,  Robert  L. 

1980  (Editor)  Archaeological  Perspectives  on 
Ethnicity  in  America:  Afro-American  and 
Asian  American  Culture  History.  Baywood 
Publishing  Company,  Farmingdale,  NY. 

1988        Archaeological  Remains,   Documents,  and 
Anthropology:     A  Call  for  a  New  Culture 
History.    Historical    Archaeology  22(1):  36- 
42. 
Schulz,  Peter  D.,  and  Sherri  M.  Gust 

1983  Faunal  Remains  and  Social  Status  in  19th 
Century  Sacramento.  Historical  Archaeology 
17(1):  44-53. 

Scott,  Douglas  D.,  and  Richard  A.  Fox,  Jr. 

1987  Archaeological  Insights  into  the  Custer 
Battle:  An  Assessment  of  the  1984  Field 
Season.  University  of  Oklahoma  Press, 
Norman. 

Scranton,  Phillip 

1984  Varieties  of  Paternalism:  Industrial 
Structures  and  the  Social  Relations  of 
Production  in  American  Textiles.  American 
Quarterly  36  (2):  235-257. 

Sears,  Roebuck  and  Co. 

1897        Consumers  Guide,  Catalogue  No.  104.    (1968 

reprint.)     Chelsea  House  Publishers,  New 

York. 
1936        Golden  fubilee  Catalog.    Sears,  Roebuck  and 

Co.,  Chicago. 
1908        The    Great   Price   Maker,   Catalog   No.    117. 

(1969  reprint.)    The  Gun  Digest  Company, 

Chicago. 


Sennett,  Richard 

1969  (Editor)  Classic  Essays  on  the  Culture  of 
Cities.    Prentice-Hall,  Englewood  Cliffs,  NJ. 

1978        The  Fall  of  Public  Man.    Vintage  Books,  New 
York. 
Shacklette,  Hansford,  and  J.  Boerngen 

1984  Element  Concentrations  in  Soils  and  Other 
Surficial  Materials  in  Coterminous  United 
States.  U.  S.  Geological  Survey  Professional 
Paper  1270.  U.  S.  Government  Printing  Office, 
Washington,  D.  C. 

Shackley,  Myra 

1975  Archaeological  Sediments:  A  Survey  of 
Analytical  Methods.  John  Wiley  and  Sons, 
New  York. 

Shanks,  Michael,  and  Christopher  Tilley 

1982  Ideology,  Symbolic  Power  and  Ritual 
Communication:  A  Reinterpretation  of 
Neolithic  Mortuary  Practices.  In  Symbolic 
and  Structural  Archaeology,  ed.  by  Ian 
Hodder,  129-154.  Cambridge  University 
Press,  Cambridge 

Shapiro,  Laura 

1986  Perfection  Salad:  Women  and  Cooking  at  the 
Turn  of  the  Century.  Farrar,  Strauss,  and 
Giroux,  New  York. 

Shattuck,  Lemuel  (and  others) 

1850  Report  of  the  Sanitary  Commission  of 
Massachusetts,  1850.  (1948  reprint.)  Harvard 
University  Press,  Cambridge,  MA. 

Shennan,  Stephen 

1982  Ideology,  Change,  and  the  European  Early 
Bronze  Age.  In  Symbolic  and  Structural 
Archaeology,  ed.  by  Ian  Hodder,  155-161. 
Cambridge  University  Press,  Cambridge 

Shephard,  Steven  Judd 

1987  Status  Variation  in  Antebellum  Alexandria: 
An  Archaeological  Study  of  Ceramic 
Tableware.  In  Consumer  Choice  in  Historical 
Archaeology,  ed.  by  Suzanne  M.  Spencer- 
Wood,  163-195.  Plenum  Press,  New  York. 

Sherman,  Milton  M. 

1970  All  About  Tobacco.  Sherman  National  Corp., 
New  York. 

Silver,  I.  A. 

1963  The  Ageing  of  Domestic  Animals.  In  Science 
in  Archaeology,  ed.  by  Don  Broth  well  and 
Eric  Higgs,  251-268.  Basic  Books,  New  York. 

Singer,  David 

1985  The  Use  of  Fish  Remains  as  a  Socio- Economic 
Measure:  An  Example  from  19th  Century  New 
England.  Historical  Archaeology  19(2):  1 10— 
113. 

Singer,  Michael  J.,  and  Donald  N.  Munns 

1987        Soils:     An  Introduction.     Macmillan,  New 
York. 
Sisson,  Septimus,  and  James  D.  Grossman 

1953        The    Anatomy    of    the    Domestic    Animals. 
(Revised  4th  Edition).    W.  B.  Saunders  Co., 
Philadelphia. 
Sklar,  Kathryn  Kish 

1973        Catherine    Beecher:    A    Study    in    American 
Domesticity.  W.  W.  Norton  Co.,  New  York. 
Soil  Survey  Staff 

1975        Soil      Taxonomy.       U.    S.    Department    of 
Ariculture  Handbook  436. 
Somerville   City   Directories 

Somerville  City  Directories,  various  titles 
and  publishers  on  file,  Special  Collections, 
State  Library  of  Massachusetts,  Boston. 


308   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


South,  Stanley 

1964        Analysis  of  the  Buttons  from  Brunswick  Town 
and  Fort  Fisher.    The  Florida  Anthropologist 
17(2):  113-133. 
1977        Method      and      Theory      in      Historical 
Archaeology.   Academic  Press,  New  York. 
Spencer-Wood,  Suzanne  M.,  ed. 

1987        Consumer  Choice   in  Historical  Archaeology. 
Plenum  Press,  New  York. 
Spencer-Wood,  Suzanne  M.,  and  Scott  D.  Heberling 

1987  Consumer  Choices  in  White  Ceramics:  A 
Comparison  of  Eleven  Early  Nineteenth- 
Century  Sites.  In  Consumer  Choice  in 
Historical  Archaeology,  ed.  by  Suzanne  M. 
Spencer-Wood,  55-84.  Plenum  Press,  New 
York. 
Sprague,  Roderick 

1989        Review     of     A     Study    of    Five    Historic 
Cemeteries   at   Choke  Canyon   Resevoir,   Live 
Oak  and  McMullen  Counties  by  Anne  A.  Fox. 
Historical  Archaeology  23(1):  131-133. 
Stage,  Sarah 

1979        Female  Complaints:     Lydia  Pinkham  and  the 
Business    of    Women's    Medicine..     W.  W. 
Norton  &  Company,  New  York. 
Starna,  W.  A.,  and  D.  A.  Kane,  Jr. 

1983        Phytoliths,  Archaeology,  and  Caveats:     A 
Case  Study  from  New  York  State.  Man  in  the 
Northeast  26:  21-32. 
Staski,  Edward,  ed. 

1987  Living  in  Cities:  Current  Research  in  Urban 
Archaeology.  Special  Publication  Series  5. 
Published  for  Society  for  Historical 
Archaeology  by  Braun-Brumfield,  Inc.,  Ann 
Arbor. 

Stein,  J.  K. 

1985  Interpreting  Sediments  in  Cultural  Settings. 
In  Archaeological  Sediments  in  Context,  ed. 
by  Julie  K.  Stein  and  W.  R.  Farrand.  Center 
for  the  Study  of  Early  Man,  Orono,  ME. 

Steinberg,  S. 

1981  The  Ethnic  Myth.   Beacon  Press,  Boston. 
Stivers,  Richard 

1976        A   Hair   of   the    Dog:      Irish    Drinking   and 
American    Stereotype.      The   Pennsylvania 
State  University  Press,  University  Park. 
Stone,  Garry  W. 

1988  Artifacts  are  Not  Enough.  In  Documentary 
Archaeology  in  the  New  World,  ed.  by  Mary 
C.  Beaudry,  68-77.  Cambridge  University 
Press,  Cambridge. 

Stone,  Lyle  M. 

1974  Fort  Michilimackinac  1715-1781:  An 
Archaeological  Perspective  on  the 
Revolutionary  Frontier.  Michigan  State 
University,  East  Lansing. 

Strasser,  Susan 

1982  Never  Done:  A  History  of  American 
Housework.   Pantheon  Books,  New  York. 

Sudbury,  Byron 

1979        Historic  Clay  Tobacco  Pipemakers  in   the 

United    States    of    America.        In     The 

Archaeology  of  the   Clay   Tobacco   Pipe.      II. 

America.,   ed.   by   Peter    Davey,    151-341. 

British     Archaeological     Reports     British 

Series  60.   Oxford. 
1980a      A  Preliminary  Report  on  the  R.  Bannerman 

Eagle  Tobacco  Pipe  Manufactory,   Rouse's 

Point,  New  York.    Historic  Clay  Tobacco  Pipe 

Studies  1:  3-22. 


Sudbury,  Byron,  cont'd. 

1980b      White  Clay  Pipes  from  the  Old  Connellsville 
Dump,  36  Fa  140.   Historic  Clay  Tobacco  Pipe 
Studies  1:  23-46. 
Sudbury,  Byron,  and  Michael  A.  Pfeiffer 

1983        Clay  Pipes  in  an  1875  Wm.  Demuth  &  Co. 
Catalogue.       Historic    Clay    Tobacco    Pipe 
Studies  2:  72-73. 
Sunday  Arena 

1893        French  &  Puffer  Advertizement,  February  12, 
1893.  Lowell,  MA. 
Swan,  June 

1982        Shoes.   Drama  Book  Publishers,  New  York. 
Taylor,  Charles 

1979        Interpretation  and  the  Sciences  of  Man.    In 
Interpretive     Social     Science,   ed.   by   Paul 
Rabinow     and     William     M.     Sullivan. 
University  of  California  Press,  Berkeley. 
Taylor,  Walter  W. 

1967        A   Study  of  Archeology.      Southern   Illinois 
Press,  Carbon  dale. 
Thompson,  E.  P. 

1963        The  Making  of  the   English    Working   Class. 

1966  edition.  Vintage,  New  York. 
1974        Patrician  Society,  Plebian  Culture.    Journal  of 
Social  History  7:  460-508. 

1978  Eighteenth-century  English  Society:  Class 
Struggle  Without  Class?  Social  History  3(2): 
133-165. 

Thome,  C.  J. 

1947        Handbook    of    Old    Pottery    and    Porcelain 
Marks.  Tudor,  New  York. 
Tolstoy,  Leo 

1891        The  Ethics  of  Wine-Drinking  and  Tobacco- 
Smoking.   Contemporary  Review  59:  170-187. 
Toulouse,  Julian  Harrison 

1969a      A  Primer  on  Mold  Seams:    Part  One.    The 

Western  Collector  7(11):  526-535. 
1969b      A  Primer  on  Mold  Seams:     Part  Two.    The 

Western  Collector  7(11):  579-587. 
1972        Bottle   Makers   and   Their   Marks.     Thomas 
Nelson,  Inc.,  New  York. 
Tschudy,  R.  H. 

1969        Relationship      of      Palynomorphs      to 
Sedimentation.    In  Aspects  of  Palynology,  ed. 
by  R.  S.  Tschudy  and  R.  S.  Scott,  79-96.  John 
Wiley  and  Sons,  New  York. 
Turner,  James  Ross 

1972       The    American     Prohibition    Movement. 
Unpublished  Ph.   D.   diss.,   University  of 
Wisconsin. 
Turner,  Victor 

1974        Dramas,   Fields,   and   Metaphors:      Symbolic 
Action  in  Human  Society.    Cornell  University 
Press,  Ithaca,  NY. 
Twiss,  P.  C,  E.  Suess,  and  R.  M.  Smith 

1969        Morphological    Classification    of    Grass 
Phytoliths.     Soil  Science  Society  of  America 
Proceedings  33(1):  109-115. 
Tyrrell,  Ian  R. 

1979  Sobering  Up:  From  Temperance  to  Prohibition 
in  Antebellum  America,  1800-1860. 
Greenwood  Press,  Westport,  CT. 

United  States  Federal  Census 

1880  Manuscript  Censuses.    University  of  Lowell 

Special  Collections,  Lowell,  MA. 
van  Zeist,  W. 

1967        Archaeology     and     Palynology     in     the 

Netherlands.      Review  of  Paleobotany  and 

Palynology  4:  45-65. 


References  309 


Vamum,  John  Marshall 

1907        The  Varnums  of  Dracut:  A  History.     David 
Qapp  &  Sons,  Boston. 
Veblen,  Thorstein 

1899        The  Theory  of  the  leisure  Class.    1979  edition. 
Penguin,  New  York. 
Verma,  S.  D.,  and  R.  H.  Rust 

1969  Observations  on  Opal  Phytoliths  in  a  Soil 
Biosequence  in  Southeastern  Minnesota.  Soil 
Science  Society  of  America  Proceedings  33(5): 
749-751. 

Von  Den  Driesch,  Angela 

1976  A  Guide  to  the  Measurement  of  Animal  Bones 
from  Archaeological  Sites.  Peabody  Museum 
Bulletin  1.  Peabody  Museum  of  Archaeology 
and  Ethnology,  Harvard  University, 
Cambridge,  MA. 

Vox  Populi 

1888        Request  to  revoke  Paige  Street  liquor  licenses 
1891        Obituary  of  Helen  Barker,  May  30,  1891. 

Walch,  K.  M.,  J.  R.  Rowley,  and  J.  J.  Norton 

1970  Displacement  of  Pollen  Grains  by 
Earthworms.   Pollen  el  Spores  12:  39-44. 

Walker,  Iain  C. 

1965  Some  Thoughts  on  the  Harrington  and  Binford 
Systems  for  Statistically  Dating  Clay  Pipes. 
Quarterly  Bulletin,  Archeological  Society  of 
Virginia  20(2):  60-64. 

1967  Statistical  Methods  for  Dating  Clay  Pipe 
Fragments.  Post-Medieval  Archaeology  1967: 
90-101. 

1977  Clay  Tobacco-Pipes,  with  Particular 
Reference  to  the  Bristol  Industry.  History  and 
Archaeology  (Parks  Canada,  Ottawa)  11A- 
D. 

1983  Nineteenth-Century  Clay  Tobacco  Pipes  in 
Canada.  In  The  Archaeology  of  the  Clay 
Tobacco  Pipe.  VIII:  America,  ed.  by  Peter 
Davey.  BAR  International  Series  175. 
Oxford. 
Wall,  Diana  diZerega 

1987  At  Home  in  New  York:  The  Redefinition  of 
Gender  among  the  Middle  Class  and  Elite, 
1783-1840.   Ph.D.  diss.,  New  York  University. 

1989        The  Ritualization  of  Family  Dinner  in  New 
York  City.    Paper  presented  at  the  First  Joint 
Archaeological  Congress,  Baltimore,  MD. 
Wallace,  Anthony  F.C. 

1972        Rockdale:       The    Growth    of   an    American 
Village  in   the  Early     Industrial  Revolution. 
W.  W.  Norton  and  Co.,  New  York. 
Warner,  Sam  Bass 

1962  Street  Car  Suburbs:  The  Process  of  Urban 
Growth  in  Boston.  Harvard  University 
PressCambridge,  MA. 

1987        To  Dwell  is  to  Garden:    A  History  of  Boston's 
Community       Gardens.         Northeastern 
University  Press,  Boston. 
Watkins,  Lura  Woodside 

1968  Early  New  England  Potters  and  Their  Wares. 
Archon  Books,  Hamden,  CT. 

Weber,  Carl 

1962        Weber's   Guide  to  Pipes  and  Pipe  Smoking. 

Cornerstone  Library,  New  York. 
1965        Carl   Weber's  The  Pleasures  of  Pipe  Smoking. 

Bantam  Books,  New  York. 
Weber,  Carmen  A. 

1989        Women  and  Their  Role  in  Eighteenth-Cantury 

Pleasure  Gardens  in  the  Mid-Atlantic  States. 

Paper     presented     at     the     First     Joint 

Archaeological  Congress,  Baltimore,  MD. 


Weinstock,  Lubin  and  Company 

1891        1891    Edition    of  the    Weinstock    Lubin    Co. 
Catalog.       (1975    reprint.)       Sacramento 
American       Revolution       Bicentennial 
Committee,  Sacramento. 
Wetherbee,  Jean 

1985        A  Second  Look  at  White  Ironstone.    Wallace- 
Homestead  Book  Company,  Lombard,  1L. 
Whitall,  Tatum  &  Co. 

1880  Whitall  Tatum  and  Co.1880  Flint  Glassware, 
Blue  Wares,  Perfume  and  Cologne  Bottles, 
Show  Bottles  and  Globes,  Green  Glassware, 
Stoppers,  Druggists'  Sundries.  (1971  reprint.) 
The  Pyne  Press,  Princeton,  NJ. 
White,  Anthony  G. 

1973        Lead  in  the  Urban  Environment:     A  Selected 
Bibliography .        Council     of    Planning 
Librarians,  Monticello,  IL. 
Whitehill,  Walter  Muir 

1968  Boston:  A  Topographical  History.  Second 
edition.  Belknap  Press  of  Harvard 
University  Press,  Cambridge,  MA. 

Wilcox,  R.  Turner 

1969  The  Dictionary  of  Costume.  Charles 
Scribner's  Sons,  New  York. 

Wilding,  L.  P.,  and  L.  R.  Drees 

1968  Biogenic  Opal  in  Soils  as  an  Index  of 
Vegetative  History  in  the  Prairie  Peninsula. 
In  The  Quaternary  of  Illinois,  ed.  by  R.  E. 
Bergstrom,  96-103.  University  of  Illinois 
College  of  Agriculture  Special  Publication  14. 
Urbana. 

Williams,  Raymond 

1977       Marxism  and  Literature.    Oxford  University 
Press,  Oxford. 
Williams,  Sarah  E. 

1980  The  Use  of  Beverage  Alcohol  as  Medicine. 
Journal  of  Studies  on  Alcohol  41(5):  543-566. 

Williams,  Susan 

1985  Savory  Suppers  &  Fashionable  Feasts: 
Dining  in  Victorian  America.  Pantheon 
Books,  New  York. 

Wilson,  Rex  L. 

1971        Clay     Tobacco    Pipes    from     Fort     Laramie 
National     Historic      Site      and      Related 
Locations.    U.  S.  Department  of  the  Interior, 
National  Park  Service,  Office  of  Archeology 
and  Historic  Preservation,  Washington,  DC. 

1981  Bottles  on  the  Western  Frontier.  University 
of  Arizona  Press,  Tucson. 

Wirth,  Louis 

1969  Urbanism  as  a  Way  of  Life.  In  Classic  Essays 
on  the  Culture  of  Cities,  ed.  by  Richard 
Sennett,  143-164.  (Originally  published 
1938.)   Prentice- Hall,  Englewood  Cliffs,  NJ. 

Witty,  J.  E.,  and  E.  G.  Knox 

1964  Grass  Opal  in  Some  Chestnut  and  Forested 
Soils  in  North  Central  Oregon.  Soil  Science 
Society  of  America  Proceedings  28:  685-688. 

Worthy  L. 

1982  Classification  and  Interpretation  of  Late- 
Nineteenth  and  Early-Twentieth-Century 
Ceramics.  In  Archaeology  of  Urban  American: 
A  Search  for  Pattern  and  Process,  ed.  by  Roy  S. 
Dickens,  329-360.  Academic  Press,  New  York. 

Wright,  Gwendolyn 

1981  Building  the  Dream:  A  Social  History  of 
Housing.  MIT  Press,  Cambridge,  MA. 


310   The  Boardinghouse  System  as  a  Way  of  Life 


Yaffe,  Y.,  C.  P.  Flessel,  J.  J.  Wesolowski,  A.  Del  Rosario, 
G.  N.  Guirquis,  V.  Marias,  T.  E.  Degarmo,  G. 
C.  Coleman,  J.  W.  Gramlich,  and  W.  R.  Kelly 
1983  Identification  of  Lead  Sources  in  California 
Children  Using  the  Stable  Isotope  Ratio 
Technique.  Archives  of  Environmental 
Health  38(4):  237-245. 

Yentsch,  Anne 

1975  Understanding  17th  and  18th  Century 
Colonial  Families:  An  Experiment  in 
Historical  Ethnography.  M.A.  thesis,  Brown 
University,  Providence, 
n.d.a  The  Use  of  Land  and  Space  on  Lot  83, 
Annapolis,  Maryland.  In  New  Perspectives  on 
Maryland  Archaeology,  ed.  by  R.  J.  Dent  and 

B.  J.    Little.      Special    Publication    of    the 
Maryland  Archaeology  Society,  forthcoming. 

n.d.b  The  Symbolic  Divisions  of  Pottery:  Sex- 
related  Attributes  of  English  and  Anglo- 
American  Household  Pots.  In  The 
Archaeology  of  Inequality,  ed.  by  Randall 
McGuire  and  Robert  Paynter.  Basil 
Blackwell,  Oxford,  forthcoming. 

1988a  Legends,  Houses,  Families,  and  Myths: 
Relationships  between  Material  Culture  and 
American  Ideology.  In  Documentary 
Archaeology  in  the  New  World,  ed.  by  Mary 

C.  Beaudry,  5-19.     Cambridge  University 
Press,  Cambridge. 

1988b  Farming,  Fishing,  Whaling,  Trading:  Land 
and  Sea  as  Resource  on  18th-Century  Cape 
Cod.  In  Documentary  Archaeology  in  the 
New  World,  ed.  by  Mary  C.  Beaudry,  5-19. 
Cambridge  University  Press,  Cambridge. 
1988c  Some  Opinions  on  the  Importance  of  Context. 
Paper  presented  at  the  22nd  Annual  Meetings 
of  the  Council  for  Northeast  Historical 
Archaeology,  Quebec. 
1989  The  Calvert  Orangery  in  Annapolis, 
Maryland:  A  Horticultural  Symbol  of  Power 
and  Prestige  in  an  Early  18th-Century 
Community.  In  Earth  Patterns:  Archaeology 
of  Early  American  and  Ancient  Gardens  and 
Landscapes,  ed.  by  William  M.  Kelso. 
University  Press  of  Virginia,  Charlottesville, 
forthcoming. 

Yentsch,  Anne  E.,  Naomi  Miller,  Barbara  Paca,  and 
Dolores  Piperno 
1987        Archaeologically     Defining     the     Earlier 
Garden  Landscapes  at  Morven:    Preliminary 
Results.     Northeast    Historical    Archaeology 
16:  1-29. 

Yeo,  Eileen,  and  Stephen  Yeo 

1981  Ways  of  Seeing:  Control  and  Leisure  versus 
Class  and  Struggle.  In  Popular  Culture  and 
Class  Conflict  1590-1914:  Explorations  in  the 
History  of  Labour  ari  Leisure,  ed.  by  Eileen 
Yeo  and  Stephen  Yeo,  128-154.  The  Harvester 
Press,  Brighton,  Sussex. 

"Your  Friend  and  Well- Wisher 

1889  Advice  to  Newly  weds.  Worcester  Sunday 
Telegram,  July  7,  1889:  2.  Worcester,  MA. 


REPORTS  OF  THE  DIVISION  OF  CULTURAL  RESOURCES 
North  Atlantic  Regional  Office,  National  Park  Service 

The  Division  produces  and  prints  reports  on  archeological ,  curatorial,  historical, 
and  historic  architectural  topics  that  identify,  evaluate,  document,  and  interpret 
cultural  resources  in  National  Park  Service  units  of  the  North  Atlantic  Region.  Some 
of  these  reports  are  of  general  interest  for  their  presentations  of  substantive, 
bibliographic,  technical,  or  methodological  information.  These  are  listed  below.  Those 
that  are  listed  with  an  NTIS  number  are  only  available  from  the  National  Technical 
Information  Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Road,  Springfield,  VA  22151.  Others  are  available 
from  the  Division  of  Cultural  Resources,  NARO,  National  Park  Service,  15  State  Street, 
Boston,  MA   02109.   Prices  are  listed. 

Cultural  Resources  Management  Studies 

No.  1   Archeological  Resource  Study,  Roger  Williams  National  Monument.    NTIS   PB81   185134 
Public  Archaeology  Laboratory,  Brown  University,  1979. 

No.  2  Archeological  Overview  and  Evaluation  at  Minute  Man  National      NTIS   PB81   185142 
Historical  Park.   Vernon  G.  Baker,  1980 

No.  3   Historic  Resources  Study,  Jamaica  Bay:   A  History.  NTIS   PB81   226649 

Gateway  National  Recreation  Area,  New  York-New  Jersey. 
Frederick  R.  Black,  1981. 

No.  4   Archeological  Site  Examination:   A  Case  Study  in  Urban  6.00 

Archeology.   Roger  Williams  National  Monument. 
Patricia  E.  Rubertone  and  Joan  Gallagher,  1981. 

No.  5   Archeological  Resource  Study,  Historical  Archeology  at  NTIS   PB83   186957 

Bunker  Hill  Monument.   Boston  National  Historical  Park. 
Thomas  Mahlstedt,  1981. 

No.  6  Archeological  Investigation  at  the  Narbonne  House.   Salem         7.00 
Maritime  National  Historic  Site.   Geoffrey  P.  Moran, 
Edward  F.  Zimmer,  Anne  E.  Yentsch,  1982. 

No.  7   Historic  Resource  Study,  A  History  of  Fort  Wadsworth,  4.00 

New  York  Harbor.   Frederick  R.  Black,  1983. 

No.  8   Chapters  in  the  Archeology  of  Cape  Cod,  I.   Results  of  the        NTIS   PB85   220101 
Cape  Cod  National  Seashore  Archeological  Survey,  1979-1981 
(2  volumes).   Francis  P.  McManamon,  editor,  1984. 

No.  9   The  National  Park  Service  in  the  Northeast:   A  Cultural  Resource   7.00 
Management  Bibliography.   Dwight  T.  Pitcaithley,  1984. 

No.  10  Celebrating  the  Immigrant:   An  Administrative  History  of  the      5.00 
Statue  of  Liberty  National  Monument,  1952-1982. 
Barbara  Blumberg,  1985 

No.  11  Hoosac  Docks:   Foreign  Trade  Terminal.   A  Case  of  the  4.00 

Expanding  Transportation  System  Late  in  the  Nineteenth 
Century.   Paul  0.  Weinbaum,  1985 

No.  12  The  1983  Excavations  at  19BN281:   Chapters  in  the  Archeology      5.00 
of  Cape  Cod,  II.   Christopher  L.  Borstel,  1985 

No.  13  Chapters  in  the  Archeology  of  Cape  Cod,  III:   The  Historic        5.00 
Period  and  Historic  Period  Archeology. 
Francis  P.  McManamon,  editor,  1985 

No.  14  Inventory  of  Structures:   Morristown  National  Historical  Park.     7.00 
David  Arbogast,  1985. 

No.  15  The  Scene  of  the  Battle:   Historic  Grounds  Report,  3.00 

Minute  Man  National  Historical  Park,  Joyce  L.  Malcolm,  1985 

No.  16   Chapters  in  the  Archeology  of  Cape  Cod,  IV 


No.  17   Chapters  in  the  Archeology  of  Cape  Cod,  V:   Indian  Neck  Ossuary    5.00 
Francis  P.  McManamon,  James  W.  Bradley,  and  Ann  L.  Magennis,  1986 

No.  18   Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of  the  Boott  Mills,  12.00 

Lowell,  Massachusetts.   Volume  I:   Life  at  the  Boarding  Houses 
Mary  C.  Beaudry  and  Stephen  Mrofcowski,  Editors.   1987 

No.  19   Interdisciplinary  Investigations  of  the  Boott  Mills  12.00 

Lowell,  Massachusetts.   Volume  II:   The  Kirk  Street  Agents1 
House. 

No.  20   Charlestown  Navy  Yard,  1890-1973.   Volume  I  and  II 
Frederick  R.  Black,  1988 

Archeological  Collections  Management  Project  Series 

No.   1  Archeological  Collections  Management  at  Salem  Maritime  National   4.00 
Historic  Site.   Alan  T.  Synenki  and  Sheila  Charles,  1983. 

No.   2  Archeological  Collections  Management  at  Morristown  National       3.00 
Historical  Park,  New  Jersey.   Alan  T.  Synenki  and 
Sheila  Charles,  1983. 

No.   3  Archeological  Collections  Management  of  the  Great  Island  3.00 

Tavern  Site.   Cape  Cod  National  Seashore,  Massachusetts. 
Alan  Synenki  and  Sheila  Charles,  1984. 

No.   4  Archeological  Collections  Management  at  Minute  Man  National 
Historical  Park,  Massachusetts.   Linda  A.  Towle  and 
Darcie  A.  MacMahon,  editors. 

Volume  1,  Introduction  and  Fiske  Hill  Area,  1987  4.00 

Volume  2,  Nelson  Road  Area,  1986  6.00 

Volume  3,  Virginia  Road  and  Wayside  Areas,  1986  7.00 

Volume  4,  North  Bridge  Area  and  Miscellaneous 
Collections,  1986  9.00 

No.   5   Archeological  Collections  Management  at  Saugus  Iron  Works 

National  Historic  Site,  Massachusetts,  Darcie  A.  MacMahon,  1988 


DATE  DUE 

1 

tyxux?vAuA^w3 

! 

ZL 

IXUXZUX 

uxzux 

" 

\y 

f 

DEMCO  38-297 

t> 


Interdisciplinary  investigation 
I  29.86:21/y.3 


3  E108  0^7^  0SB3 


*